5:17 I think you got dodge and burn mixed up. When you dodge, it leaves the area brighter as you are stopping the light from hitting the paper. When you burn, it darkens the image as you allow more light to hit the paper. It's the opposite of a negative where more light = brighter image.
photos on film I was scratching my heard that, was I doing it all wrong for 30 years! Weston was another photographer, thats like saying Picasso was another painter. We shot B&W because thats all we had and every sheet of film was precious. All in all a nice effort.
Google Minus but how many people of his generation would even know who to google? I think he did a nice job of introducing Adams to people who might never hear of him otherwise.
In a previous career as a commercial printer one of the jobs I has was printing the posters and books of Ansel Adams through Little Brown and Company, the publisher. There was a special high tack dense black and a grey (Ansel Adams Grey) that we used as well as other specialized materials to get the cleanest dot on a printing press. We were also using the highest dpi in the industry at the time for detail. First time through the press was the duotone pass. Let it dry then run it through again for a high gloss varnish. Let that dry. Then turn the sheet upside down and run it through the press one more time to "polish" the sheet - essential removing all of the spray powder used to keep the sheets from sticking together. Best job ever, but that was back in the late 80's. I found a picture of Ansel and Dave Gardner (Gardner Lithograph) on a press check in a drawer in the pressroom. Still got that today.
Fascinating. I recall reading about how deeply involved AA was in the printing of his work, (other than the darkroom work of course). I have a couple of the books and I have to say: you done good! 😂
As a film photographer (i know, I sound like an elitist douchebag) it just annoys me so much. I get that its for the aesthetic, but wouldnt a basic white borders look just as good? Maybe more minimalistic I guess. Other than that I thought this video was super interesting and i learned alot, so it doesnt really matter
Valerie Giacobbe haha they're definitely not accurate, just the template I already have set up from past vids. Gotta cut a few corners to get these out every week 😉
That was exceedingly well put. When you started by saying “I got interested in him several weeks ago…” I literally rolled my eyes, but luckily, age has taught me humility so I kept watching, and I’m glad I did.
My dad was a well-known commercial photographer for over 70 years and used view cameras (the ones with the bellows) almost exclusively. His largest was a monster 16x20 Deardorf with a 5" lens, used mostly for taking really high resolution photos and transparencies of very small objects, like diamonds and jewelry. It stood about 9' tall. He used all the tricks and techniques also used by Adams (and all commercial photographers of that era) and I used to watch him work in the darkroom all the time. To a small boy it all looked like magic. I'm glad to see you taking an interest in the old masters, like Adams. My dad met him once in the 1950s, but never talked much about the encounter.
Best part of this video, is talking about "Visualization". I learnt that, before i do a click, wait for a minute, think about the composition and tell a story. Every pic should be like a single frame from a movie, thanks for the teaching.
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
Loved it man.The trend photography and videography sometimes forget the rich concepts and masters of our arts, and going back to them always makes us "level up the game" (hate that expression, maybe "developing more our arts"?) and love it more. The majority of landscape photographers pratically have a base on the form of Adams and romantic painting like David Friedrich and his "Wanderer above the sea of fog", so they do, or try to do, take less photos, they observe and apreciate more before taking a photo, it's kind of a philosophy on how to apreciate, observe and truly see nature and express how our eyes, heart and mind had a emotional connection with the scene. A slow rythim and living a full experience and love for our home (Earth), our nature. In this liquid world, where everything is so fast, everything is always quickly changing, a slow pace maybe can be all we need to live well and be at peace, that's one of the lessons I get with Adams and other landscape photographers, but hey, I have always been a nature's lover and surfer since kid hahahah.
I don't know a lot about photographer that's why I didn't know of him but seeing his work right now it looks so amazing he definitely was a legend and a master of photography
Yooo Aidin, I really enjoyed this format! I Definitely learned some important photography history and the way you present it is just perfect, it keeps the attention so well!💪🏼💪🏼
Correction to time stamp 5:16 - 5:28: DODGE and BURN in printing a negative causes the opposite effect from exposing. Dodging reduces light on specific areas of the paper (though all those paper shapes at the end of a wire) so the paper will be bright / whiter. Burning (with the holes in stiff paper or cardboard) increases light at specific areas and causes darkening of the printed paper. Did this all this in my younger days, pain in the ars to get just right, using up loads of paper to get the final print just right. Also, IMHO, it is a lot easier to compose (visually) a photo with a larger camera under a drape than with a small one. It is so hard for me to see all the elements in a scene when one eye is glued to a view finder with light filling in the space on the sides or on the 3" back screen in the daylight. But at least I won't come hope with a backache after lugging tons of camera gear and tripod when using a smaller (FF or APS-C) camera.
Adams began using lighter cameras, the older he got. He used a Hasselblad and tested the early Hassie models for Victor Hasselblad. In the last year of his life he used a Leica, though not exclusively. His biography is great reading, and the PBS American Masters program on Adams is excellent. It’s very instructive to go see his work in an art museum and look at it firsthand.
I really enjoyed your video and found a great deal of admiration for the amount of effort you put into it. You grasped and presented the concept of his work at a higher than average level. You didn't just skimm the surface, you really went pretty deep! I studied the Zone System a few years ago and was taught that Ansel Adams developed his system to a degree that was very scientific. He used spot meters to read a subject scene and took many notes that he would later use in the lab. He purchased large lots of film and paper because he knew that when doing so the materials had been made with the same batches of chemicals. He made sure his materials came from the same batches. When manufacturers produced film or paper they eventually had to use new chemicals because they were spent... but even though they used the same formulas with the same measured ingredients, the final product varied in sensitivity always giving different results in the lab. So when he set up his cameras and evaluated a scene, he took his readings and already knew what the print would look like in his mind! He really had a true visualization of the scene. Using his Zone System he would know at the time of making the exposure that he would either have to contract or expand the zones in the image (according to whether he got high contrast or low contrast readings). He used the information from the readings and used it to process the film, as well as when developing the paper. He used Spectrometers to learn about the density of the batches of film he had to ensure that he would accurately get the desired results... every single time!!! When printing his images he often wouldn't just use the tools you mentioned... he would use his hands and fingers to dodge or burn parts of his prints. He would twist and gnarl his fingers to apply what he wanted to them. I don't know if it would be worth it for you to do a little more investigation into the process of using the Zone System and maybe making a video about it? Thanks for bringing back some good memories and sharing some very awesome knowledge
Thanks for making this video, Aidin. It is an entertaining and concise overview of Adams’ work and process. I discovered his images in 1979 on my first visit to Yosemite and have based my own professional photographic process on his teachings ever since. By chance, I was fortunate to visit his darkroom in Carmel - unfortunately, he wasn’t there at the time but it was an experience nevertheless. It’s great that you have shared this video with your younger audience. His books, ‘The Camera’, ‘The Negative’ and ‘The Print’ are still relevant today. In fact, I believe that Ansel Adams would have been a brilliant digital photographer and shown us how to get the most from a pixel ‘negative’.
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
I really enjoyed the concept of the video, the style of conveying information together with the slick animation and sound design was very satisfying. Thanks a lot for this great video!
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
Read his autobiography about a year ago He was very talented and complex beyond his landscape photography. I have a couple reproductions of his prints in my home office
Glad that you came across him and researched Ansel about the art of photography in the earlier years. He had inspired me in my early days of photography during the 70’s and enjoyed many of his books including, “The Negative” and “The Print”. He could only carry so many film holders with him on his trips (2 pieces of film per holder), so every image had to be composed, focussed and exposed correctly. Was lucky to see a show of his work in Toronto including his famous “Moonlight Hernandez” image which was simply stunning to see in person. He was a true master photographer and conservationist. Ansel was also a concert pianist and busted his nose during the devasting 1906 San Francisco earthquake. Great video!
Your video style is getting better and better with every video man! I am addicted! ❤ and this was the best video essay i have seen on Ansel Adams so far.
Seeing the enlarger made me miss my dark room class in college - also I think you mixed the dodging and burning effects in the video but great video anyways!
To truly understand and appreciate Ansel Adams photography, you need to see one of his prints in person. It's literally like seeing the Grand canyon all your life in books or on TV and then you see it in real life.
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
Thank you for such an inspiring video. I already loved Adams' work before, but this in-depth look has renewed my admiration for him. And for you as well, for bringing up such important issues.
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
Great video! Those photos of the waterfalls actually feature an extremely low horizon with the tops of the mountains just below the top of the frame. Same basic concept though and you're correct he uses extreme horizons to enhance his style!
Good video! A small point though. Adams is always credited with the creation of the zone system. A photographer called Fred Archer contributed a lot to it as well. Ansel Adams went out of his way to give Archer equal credit for the Zone System, he said. "I take this opportunity to restate that the Zone System is not an invention of mine; it is a codification of the principles of sensitometry, worked out by Fred Archer and myself at the Art Center School in Los Angeles, around 1939-40".
True, but the Zone System is glossed over here, and it's important to know how vital it was to Adams' getting the results on the negative that he desired. Also, Adams used filters to accentuate contrast.
@@JohnProthero I firmly believe in credit were credit is due, lots of people gloss over Fred's contribution. You say that Adams used filters. I'm 63, I started taking photographs when I was 16. Back then film was the only option, B&W was much cheaper than colour and was relatively easy to process at home. Back then all B&W photographers use filters to control contrast, it was one of the tools in your toolbox. Scanning the negatives then using Lightroom wasn't an option!
@@neilfulcher9298 Like you, Neil, I started in black and white, and used my late father's darkroom extensively. I used filters on my large format film camera to great effect.
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
You appear to be a younger man but the quality of your video seems to belie your apparent youth. I am an old lady and quite in awe of your production. I regret I won't be here long enough to see the amazing things you will accomplish in the future. You have a great life ahead.
I really appreciate this type of video. Instead of another tutorial video....this is more theory. I think this way of thinking can even be applied to other current creative avenues.
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
Thank you for making this, I think a lot of photographers don’t know that much about him. By far one of the most technically developed photographers imo he understood exposure extremely well and that photo of the full moon overlooking the village in new mexico(I think) he took that without a light meter bc he forgot his. He talks about it in his three books that he published. He calculated the exposure by estimating the luminance of the moon and the cloud coverage and all these other variables.
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
Great video. You've overlooked the contributions of Peter Henry Emerson in terms of the conception of photography as an art. His landscapes had people thinking that way in late 1800s.
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
Film used in camera is "negative" with means that source of light wil darken it. This dark area from film will allow less light to hit the paper so this area will be lighter In final photo. Using this little circle on a stick you showed will make photo even brighter becouse you block light that hits it (paper is white). Big cartboard with hole in it will darken the image in the spot you allow the light to hit the paper, so it is exacly oposite of what you said.
Well done! You made the essentials understandable and presented them in an entertaining, clear and friendly way. And you've sparked interest in finding out more about Ansel Adams and discovering your own ways of taking better pictures. Maybe some of the commentators are right and there are really a few mistakes in your video ... and if so ... who cares? (I did not) Ansel Adams and his art of photography were the focus of the video and not the presenter (like almost everywhere else on UA-cam). Such a short video presentation can only be a "teaser" to do your own research after watching it. And your video served this purpose very well. This comment comes from someone who, decades ago, developed even more interest in analog (there was no "digital"!) slide photography (no post-processing possible!) because his jaws fell on his chest when looking at Ansel Adams' photos in a large-format illustrated book ... ("book", that is something big and flat for reading and looking at, made of printed paper; it works without batteries ...) For me Ansel Adams' pictures didn't lead to "f64", but to "ISO64" ... I just say "Kodachrome" or "Fujichrome" ... those were magic words back then ... A very slightly underexposed landscape shot in the bluish light of the Scandinavian sun, back then on Kodachrome 64 with my beloved Olympus OM2 ... the slide projected onto a white wall as big as it gets - that just knocks you out! Without having seen Ansel Adams' work, I would never have taken such photos!
Love this video and was about to show to my middle school class, but I can't cause you said "hell" just once. So close to being perfect. Just something to consider for future videos.
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
You always had me convinced that Ansel shot all those on Kodak portra 400. Until the coffee kicked in and I remember that is a color film which I clearly don’t shoot enough from. Nice channel. I will give it a sub.
Love it man, great content! I especially needed to hear the part about visualization, spray and pray far too often. Heading out for a backpacking trip this weekend, so this video was perfect timing as well!
It’s easy to forget that with a view camera, Adams composed all his photos with the groundglass image upside-down and reversed left to right. Try that sometime!
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
Really really cool production on this video. The portra 400 border around bw photos bothered me a little ngl but literally everything else was sick. Keep it up man!
Hi Aidin nice video! Do you think you could make a behind the scenes of what your tutorials look like? like maybe what lights you use, where you put them, stuff like that
5:17 I think you got dodge and burn mixed up. When you dodge, it leaves the area brighter as you are stopping the light from hitting the paper. When you burn, it darkens the image as you allow more light to hit the paper. It's the opposite of a negative where more light = brighter image.
"How to make a "documentary" by only reading some Wikipedia pages"
Google Minus lol right
Yes, correct, Dodge lightens, Burn darkens when printing from a negative.
photos on film I was scratching my heard that, was I doing it all wrong for 30 years! Weston was another photographer, thats like saying Picasso was another painter. We shot B&W because thats all we had and every sheet of film was precious. All in all a nice effort.
Google Minus but how many people of his generation would even know who to google? I think he did a nice job of introducing Adams to people who might never hear of him otherwise.
In a previous career as a commercial printer one of the jobs I has was printing the posters and books of Ansel Adams through Little Brown and Company, the publisher. There was a special high tack dense black and a grey (Ansel Adams Grey) that we used as well as other specialized materials to get the cleanest dot on a printing press. We were also using the highest dpi in the industry at the time for detail. First time through the press was the duotone pass. Let it dry then run it through again for a high gloss varnish. Let that dry. Then turn the sheet upside down and run it through the press one more time to "polish" the sheet - essential removing all of the spray powder used to keep the sheets from sticking together. Best job ever, but that was back in the late 80's. I found a picture of Ansel and Dave Gardner (Gardner Lithograph) on a press check in a drawer in the pressroom. Still got that today.
love this comment. super interesting.
Fascinating. I recall reading about how deeply involved AA was in the printing of his work, (other than the darkroom work of course). I have a couple of the books and I have to say: you done good! 😂
I’m not sure Ansel used portra 400 like the film borders suggest, but I’m excited to watch the rest
Description ;)
Aidin Robbins 😂
As a film photographer (i know, I sound like an elitist douchebag) it just annoys me so much. I get that its for the aesthetic, but wouldnt a basic white borders look just as good? Maybe more minimalistic I guess. Other than that I thought this video was super interesting and i learned alot, so it doesnt really matter
FXpro97 I feel like for this video especially it doesn’t make sense because part of his legacy is his black and white, large format work
Valerie Giacobbe haha they're definitely not accurate, just the template I already have set up from past vids. Gotta cut a few corners to get these out every week 😉
That was exceedingly well put. When you started by saying “I got interested in him several weeks ago…” I literally rolled my eyes, but luckily, age has taught me humility so I kept watching, and I’m glad I did.
We all felt that. haha
My dad was a well-known commercial photographer for over 70 years and used view cameras (the ones with the bellows) almost exclusively. His largest was a monster 16x20 Deardorf with a 5" lens, used mostly for taking really high resolution photos and transparencies of very small objects, like diamonds and jewelry. It stood about 9' tall. He used all the tricks and techniques also used by Adams (and all commercial photographers of that era) and I used to watch him work in the darkroom all the time. To a small boy it all looked like magic. I'm glad to see you taking an interest in the old masters, like Adams. My dad met him once in the 1950s, but never talked much about the encounter.
Best part of this video, is talking about "Visualization". I learnt that, before i do a click, wait for a minute, think about the composition and tell a story. Every pic should be like a single frame from a movie, thanks for the teaching.
Keep going Aidin, you’re an inspiration.
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
Loved it man.The trend photography and videography sometimes forget the rich concepts and masters of our arts, and going back to them always makes us "level up the game" (hate that expression, maybe "developing more our arts"?) and love it more. The majority of landscape photographers pratically have a base on the form of Adams and romantic painting like David Friedrich and his "Wanderer above the sea of fog", so they do, or try to do, take less photos, they observe and apreciate more before taking a photo, it's kind of a philosophy on how to apreciate, observe and truly see nature and express how our eyes, heart and mind had a emotional connection with the scene. A slow rythim and living a full experience and love for our home (Earth), our nature. In this liquid world, where everything is so fast, everything is always quickly changing, a slow pace maybe can be all we need to live well and be at peace, that's one of the lessons I get with Adams and other landscape photographers, but hey, I have always been a nature's lover and surfer since kid hahahah.
I don't know a lot about photographer that's why I didn't know of him but seeing his work right now it looks so amazing he definitely was a legend and a master of photography
Well you’re only a few weeks away from making a whole video about him if you follow this model
Yooo Aidin, I really enjoyed this format! I Definitely learned some important photography history and the way you present it is just perfect, it keeps the attention so well!💪🏼💪🏼
Correction to time stamp 5:16 - 5:28: DODGE and BURN in printing a negative causes the opposite effect from exposing. Dodging reduces light on specific areas of the paper (though all those paper shapes at the end of a wire) so the paper will be bright / whiter. Burning (with the holes in stiff paper or cardboard) increases light at specific areas and causes darkening of the printed paper. Did this all this in my younger days, pain in the ars to get just right, using up loads of paper to get the final print just right.
Also, IMHO, it is a lot easier to compose (visually) a photo with a larger camera under a drape than with a small one. It is so hard for me to see all the elements in a scene when one eye is glued to a view finder with light filling in the space on the sides or on the 3" back screen in the daylight. But at least I won't come hope with a backache after lugging tons of camera gear and tripod when using a smaller (FF or APS-C) camera.
Adams began using lighter cameras, the older he got. He used a Hasselblad and tested the early Hassie models for Victor Hasselblad. In the last year of his life he used a Leica, though not exclusively. His biography is great reading, and the PBS American Masters program on Adams is excellent. It’s very instructive to go see his work in an art museum and look at it firsthand.
I'm using lighter cameras the older I get, too. I hiked the John Muir Trail with a view camera once. I'm not doing that again.
Best ever clear, concise description of Ansel Adams and several of his techniques. Excellent!
I really enjoyed your video and found a great deal of admiration for the amount of effort you put into it. You grasped and presented the concept of his work at a higher than average level. You didn't just skimm the surface, you really went pretty deep!
I studied the Zone System a few years ago and was taught that Ansel Adams developed his system to a degree that was very scientific. He used spot meters to read a subject scene and took many notes that he would later use in the lab. He purchased large lots of film and paper because he knew that when doing so the materials had been made with the same batches of chemicals. He made sure his materials came from the same batches. When manufacturers produced film or paper they eventually had to use new chemicals because they were spent... but even though they used the same formulas with the same measured ingredients, the final product varied in sensitivity always giving different results in the lab. So when he set up his cameras and evaluated a scene, he took his readings and already knew what the print would look like in his mind!
He really had a true visualization of the scene.
Using his Zone System he would know at the time of making the exposure that he would either have to contract or expand the zones in the image (according to whether he got high contrast or low contrast readings). He used the information from the readings and used it to process the film, as well as when developing the paper. He used Spectrometers to learn about the density of the batches of film he had to ensure that he would accurately get the desired results... every single time!!!
When printing his images he often wouldn't just use the tools you mentioned... he would use his hands and fingers to dodge or burn parts of his prints. He would twist and gnarl his fingers to apply what he wanted to them.
I don't know if it would be worth it for you to do a little more investigation into the process of using the Zone System and maybe making a video about it?
Thanks for bringing back some good memories and sharing some very awesome knowledge
Thanks for making this video, Aidin. It is an entertaining and concise overview of Adams’ work and process. I discovered his images in 1979 on my first visit to Yosemite and have based my own professional photographic process on his teachings ever since. By chance, I was fortunate to visit his darkroom in Carmel - unfortunately, he wasn’t there at the time but it was an experience nevertheless.
It’s great that you have shared this video with your younger audience. His books, ‘The Camera’, ‘The Negative’ and ‘The Print’ are still relevant today. In fact, I believe that Ansel Adams would have been a brilliant digital photographer and shown us how to get the most from a pixel ‘negative’.
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
I really enjoyed the concept of the video, the style of conveying information together with the slick animation and sound design was very satisfying.
Thanks a lot for this great video!
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
3030: ”How Aidin Robbins changed the history of filmmaking”
Fantastic video. I've enjoyed Adams' work for a while but learned more from this video!
Read his autobiography about a year ago
He was very talented and complex beyond his landscape photography. I have a couple reproductions of his prints in my home office
Bro you bouta be the next one in the history of filmmaking I’ll see you there 👀
Glad that you came across him and researched Ansel about the art of photography in the earlier years.
He had inspired me in my early days of photography during the 70’s and enjoyed many of his books including, “The Negative” and “The Print”.
He could only carry so many film holders with him on his trips (2 pieces of film per holder), so every image had to be composed, focussed and exposed correctly.
Was lucky to see a show of his work in Toronto including his famous “Moonlight Hernandez” image which was simply stunning to
see in person.
He was a true master photographer and conservationist.
Ansel was also a concert pianist and busted his nose during the devasting 1906 San Francisco earthquake.
Great video!
Thank you for taking the time to make this video. Your presentation is second to none.
This was a beautiful essay on a wonderful photographer - man amazing video Aidin :)
Your video style is getting better and better with every video man! I am addicted! ❤ and this was the best video essay i have seen on Ansel Adams so far.
Seeing the enlarger made me miss my dark room class in college - also I think you mixed the dodging and burning effects in the video but great video anyways!
This is awesome, I had to watch this for my Art 111 class in college. Great job man.
Thank you for this awesome highlights of Ansel Adam's!
Wow Aidin! Excellent synopsis of Ansel Adam’s and his work!
this has been amazing clear-concise.really found the presentation fascinating
To truly understand and appreciate Ansel Adams photography, you need to see one of his prints in person. It's literally like seeing the Grand canyon all your life in books or on TV and then you see it in real life.
Thank you this whole edit was fun to watch!
I love the production quality of this video! and the story as well. You nailed it Aidin!!
Another enjoyable video Aidin. Really enjoyed it and learnt lots of new things. Again it left me feeling inspired to go out and make photos.
Thanks for sharing. Your observations about how Adams composed his shots was very helpful. Great video, sir
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
Thank you for such an inspiring video. I already loved Adams' work before, but this in-depth look has renewed my admiration for him. And for you as well, for bringing up such important issues.
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
Great video! Those photos of the waterfalls actually feature an extremely low horizon with the tops of the mountains just below the top of the frame. Same basic concept though and you're correct he uses extreme horizons to enhance his style!
Ansel Adams vision is still alive today. Now it's our job to protect it. Bravo Meistro.
Enjoyed this video so much. Very interesting topic and your video editing makes it so easy to watch
Great clip and very informative. Thanks for creating 🙏🏻
Good video! A small point though. Adams is always credited with the creation of the zone system. A photographer called Fred Archer contributed a lot to it as well.
Ansel Adams went out of his way to give Archer equal credit for the Zone System, he said. "I take this opportunity to restate that the Zone System is not an invention of mine; it is a codification of the principles of sensitometry, worked out by Fred Archer and myself at the Art Center School in Los Angeles, around 1939-40".
True, but the Zone System is glossed over here, and it's important to know how vital it was to Adams' getting the results on the negative that he desired. Also, Adams used filters to accentuate contrast.
@@JohnProthero I firmly believe in credit were credit is due, lots of people gloss over Fred's contribution. You say that Adams used filters. I'm 63, I started taking photographs when I was 16. Back then film was the only option, B&W was much cheaper than colour and was relatively easy to process at home. Back then all B&W photographers use filters to control contrast, it was one of the tools in your toolbox. Scanning the negatives then using Lightroom wasn't an option!
@@neilfulcher9298 Like you, Neil, I started in black and white, and used my late father's darkroom extensively. I used filters on my large format film camera to great effect.
Great job Aiden, so enjoyed your documentary about Ansel Adams 👍
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
Nice! Ansel Adam is one of the many people who inspired me to do photography! I love his work!
Excellent job Aiden. Thank you.
You appear to be a younger man but the quality of your video seems to belie your apparent youth. I am an old lady and quite in awe of your production. I regret I won't be here long enough to see the amazing things you will accomplish in the future. You have a great life ahead.
Extremely informative and enjoyable! Thank you!
I really appreciate this type of video. Instead of another tutorial video....this is more theory. I think this way of thinking can even be applied to other current creative avenues.
Excellent video - thank you for the high quality content!
Loved this kind of video!!! Good Job ;)
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
This was terrific! I wanted a swift backgrounder on Mr Adams. You nailed it. Many thanks,
Great video! I’m intrigued to study him and his work more. Thanks Aidin!
Thanks for sharing your learning and analysis through his work. Open up a bunch horizons for me! Thanks mate and keep up with the videos.
This was really insightful and helpful!
Most informative and thought provoking.....thank you
Great Aidin! Thank you very much! All the content, the infos, scenes, your editing!! Really great!!
Thanks man!
Thank you for making this, I think a lot of photographers don’t know that much about him. By far one of the most technically developed photographers imo he understood exposure extremely well and that photo of the full moon overlooking the village in new mexico(I think) he took that without a light meter bc he forgot his.
He talks about it in his three books that he published. He calculated the exposure by estimating the luminance of the moon and the cloud coverage and all these other variables.
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
He had a light meter with him in the car, but he couldn't find it in the rush.
Love how much effort you put into editing this one
Great video. You've overlooked the contributions of Peter Henry Emerson in terms of the conception of photography as an art. His landscapes had people thinking that way in late 1800s.
Thanks for sharing this much of knowledge with us🙌
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
Film used in camera is "negative" with means that source of light wil darken it. This dark area from film will allow less light to hit the paper so this area will be lighter In final photo. Using this little circle on a stick you showed will make photo even brighter becouse you block light that hits it (paper is white). Big cartboard with hole in it will darken the image in the spot you allow the light to hit the paper, so it is exacly oposite of what you said.
Yuppp realized in the edit I had that one reversed haha. wouldn't say I'm a darkroom expert 😉
@@AidinRobbins Nah it is tricky I know. And it is a tiny detail, but you are doing a great job and I'm looking forward to see more!
Great summary and nicely done. Thank you.
Hey Aidin, You are so Inspiring 🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻
Thank You from India 🇮🇳 🙏🏻
Well done! You made the essentials understandable and presented them in an entertaining, clear and friendly way.
And you've sparked interest in finding out more about Ansel Adams and discovering your own ways of taking better pictures.
Maybe some of the commentators are right and there are really a few mistakes in your video ... and if so ... who cares? (I did not)
Ansel Adams and his art of photography were the focus of the video and not the presenter (like almost everywhere else on UA-cam).
Such a short video presentation can only be a "teaser" to do your own research after watching it. And your video served this purpose very well.
This comment comes from someone who, decades ago, developed even more interest in analog (there was no "digital"!) slide photography (no post-processing possible!) because his jaws fell on his chest when looking at Ansel Adams' photos in a large-format illustrated book ... ("book", that is something big and flat for reading and looking at, made of printed paper; it works without batteries ...)
For me Ansel Adams' pictures didn't lead to "f64", but to "ISO64" ... I just say "Kodachrome" or "Fujichrome" ... those were magic words back then ...
A very slightly underexposed landscape shot in the bluish light of the Scandinavian sun, back then on Kodachrome 64 with my beloved Olympus OM2 ... the slide projected onto a white wall as big as it gets - that just knocks you out! Without having seen Ansel Adams' work, I would never have taken such photos!
Love this video and was about to show to my middle school class, but I can't cause you said "hell" just once. So close to being perfect. Just something to consider for future videos.
There is so much I love about this ❤️
I Sense more Style Breakdowns coming up real soon.
Also I'm ashamed for not knowing he who really was, well Thanks for the kewl insight brother :”))
LOVED your video Aidin. Keep up the amazing work. 😀
Love the mood lighting of the talking head shot portions! You should do more videos like this! Great video.
Aidin Robbins is for sure underrated
The best one aidin ❤️❤️
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
Love Ansel Adams! This was a great video! Had no idea on some of the stuff!
Aidin is amazing
You always had me convinced that Ansel shot all those on Kodak portra 400. Until the coffee kicked in and I remember that is a color film which I clearly don’t shoot enough from. Nice channel. I will give it a sub.
love this video and also how you brought the conversation aspect into this
Nice video! I had a darkroom in the past and used Ansel Adams zone system for exposing photopaper.
that slow blur effect on the old photo was incredible!
Awesome job. I liked how you changed your studio to match the theme of the video.
Love it man, great content! I especially needed to hear the part about visualization, spray and pray far too often. Heading out for a backpacking trip this weekend, so this video was perfect timing as well!
Love your thumbnails, and the Parallax effect on Ansel’s photos! You should make videos on both!
Photography is a trade it's the Creator that puts the art into the trade that makes it unique
It’s easy to forget that with a view camera, Adams composed all his photos with the groundglass image upside-down and reversed left to right. Try that sometime!
Love your videos ever since I can remember! Are you gonna do an updated what's I'm my camera bag?
I love this! I’ve loved photography for years but never knew it’s history, thank you for this
Fantastic as always Aidin! Super cool to see the crazy amounts of work and thought that go into a photo like that. 😀
Loved This Video❤️❤️
Thanks for Making this video❤️❤️
😊 I enjoyed your take, nice work
Great edit! Informative and well-paced.
ay i do professional film and i make really good youtube videos, if you have time could you check out my most recent video and give me some feedback? :)
Dilly VFX no thanks but wish you the best of luck.
Dope video man! I had a calendar with his work several years ago which was part of my inspiration for getting into photography!
Really really cool production on this video. The portra 400 border around bw photos bothered me a little ngl but literally everything else was sick. Keep it up man!
Loved this video Aidin. Heard a lot about Ansel always but glad you came up and described WHY he is such a big name. Even more respect for him now.
Glad you learned something!
Good work, as always. Keep 'em coming.
one of your best videos, bro.
Good job and nicely explained
Hi Aidin nice video! Do you think you could make a behind the scenes of what your tutorials look like? like maybe what lights you use, where you put them, stuff like that
Love this Aidin. Great video man!
Absolutely brilliant video, from start to finish 👏 👌
Many thanks!
Very good video. I appreciate what you have done .
Awesome video love Ansel Adams he’s a big inspiration of mine
Thanks! Informative and made me think. Which is good!
Definitely learned something new today🙌
You expose paper under the enlarger and develop with chemistry. Nice to see Ansel remembered.