MASHALLAH you are showing the essence of Islam ,the existence of real God ALLAH tackling science with scientific knowledge beautifully MASHALLAH ALHAMDULLIAH for ISLAM
Thank you ustadh Nouman Ali Khan for referring to this amazing person in your lectures ❤️. It is very nice getting to know you ustadh Hamza may Allah brings me closer to him by your help
Assalamu Alaikum Shaykh Hamza! Masha'Allah, what a sound, sane, friendly, and beneficial talk. I'm looking forward to this new series and your approach to it.
Al hamdulilah, very well explained. This was so clear that any attempt to refute it would be foolish, calm, concise, direct and brief with proofs backed by science. Shukran my dear brother!!, I'm looking forward to your next video!!
You have a great approach, Hamza. I agree with you; this is a gift. Not only for us to convey the information to others but to challenge our own selves by contemplating the evidence for the existence of a god. After all, it must be that those who insist on evidence yet believe in a god are simply convinced that more evidence (yes evidence) exists for a god than for a lack of one. Great job.
Yeah, well, try to tell this "fairy tale" to the governments of Saudi Arabía, Yemen, Iran, Pakistan, Chechnya or any other government with muslim majority population and see how appreciative they will be of your message.
Killing people over cartoons is dangerously irrational. Any religion that denies freedom of speech is worth fighting against. Truth does not fear dissent.
try going to France and burning their flag or using the flag as toilet paper. Tell me how far your freedom of speech right 'they' will allow you to exercise.
@@kilianp123 not every Muslim will kill you for drawing cartoons but there is always one just as there could always be one hardcore patriotic dude ready to kill you for mocking his/her land. I'm not saying one is right over the other. Still I think you MISSED the point, death or no death, if you or France say freedom of speech is an absolute right but deny the right of mocking their/your flag is incoherent. If done so then you could face punishment.
@@freeyourmind7538 you do realise that the freedom of speech in France is not always comparable to other countries. I'm not sure what absolut freedom of speech even means. In a functioning state there are always limits to it. It would be helpful to this conversation to describe what you think freedom of speech is
I think that atheist are pointing out what isn't rational. Not just about your brand of religion, but all brands of religion. I call them brands for a reason. Why? because all claim to be the right brand, but without telling you why. Well the best they can do is say I'm true, you'll just have to believe me. Does a rational person accept that as rational with any other belief?
I think what you’re going to find in these videos is the “why” Islam is rational, and that it’s a fallacy of equivocation to say all religions claim to be true without providing evidence, that Islam is the exception. Hamza is giving a specifically Islamic response, not a general response for all religions. But don’t take my word for it, check out the videos as they come out and judge for yourself. :)
@@AhmedHassan-fh4ec I think that's what all religions claim. Isn't it? That was my point. Now Do rational people use one standard of belief? Do rational people make exceptions to that standard? Of course not that wouldn't be rational.
Not interested in an internet debate with a stranger but I would argue that Islam is different. It doesn’t require the belief in a complex trinity with acceptance of the son of the Creater as God to be saved. It’s much more nuanced, if you are willing to look at it. When you say it’s a brand of let’s say water like Fiji water we would say it is water itself. It’s what the native Americans call the Creater. It’s what the Hindus called their main God, it’s the common thread in basically every group of humans that has existed. It is who Jesus prayed to and Moses and countless others that are not mentioned by name in the Quran. What’s the reason for this common thread in (almost )every people from African tribes to the aborigines to the inca? I guess you would see evolution or some other advantage in natural selection. Perhaps. I am not convinced. Or what is the evolutionary advantage to guilt? Still trying to figure it out myself. In the end, honestly as I started with, not really interested in an internet argument but I hope we can both reflect and think on each other’s ideas. Peace.
Would you say that the studies that showed efficacy of the Pfizer or moderna vaccine based on a P value of 0.05 - signifying 2 standard deviations against the wild type covid - demonstrated that they are efficacious. And someone took the position that it is not the case. If the studies are repeated with a meta analysis and yet again show the same result, with the same p value, would you not feel the burden of proof is on the one who argues against its efficacy? Consider where you are in the grand scheme of peoples? Are you the outlier sitting 2,3,4 standard deviations from all humans in history or those who believe in a God. Honestly an agnostic view seems more reasonable to an outright atheistic view point to me.
@@KJ-rm3je If you're required to believe, shouldn't that belief be held to the same standards as your other beliefs. If not it is not rational. I also think that our natural wonderment is mistaken for a god. We all have that, it's called human nature. The difference is that some invent an explanation. This is evident by the countless number of gods that have been invented throughout recorded history. Only one of those inventions is your god.
I'm not Muslim but the existence of God is universal so good.
Mashallah! Bubbling crystal-clear pure water for a parched and impoverished landscape.
Thank you Umm Ibrahim!
Love this, Alhamdulillah, Subhanallah Masha Allah
MASHALLAH you are showing the essence of Islam ,the existence of real God ALLAH tackling science with scientific knowledge beautifully MASHALLAH
ALHAMDULLIAH for ISLAM
Thank you ustadh Nouman Ali Khan for referring to this amazing person in your lectures ❤️. It is very nice getting to know you ustadh Hamza may Allah brings me closer to him by your help
Assalamu Alaikum Shaykh Hamza! Masha'Allah, what a sound, sane, friendly, and beneficial talk. I'm looking forward to this new series and your approach to it.
wa alaykum as salam wa rahmatullah! Thank you for your encouragement.
So well put, looking forward to these rational arguments!
Amazing work and approach, Shaykh. May Allah swt elevate your rank and increase you in science and benefit for the Ummah. أمين يا رب
Thank you for your prayers! May Allah Most High bless you and increase you in every khayr.
Al hamdulilah, very well explained. This was so clear that any attempt to refute it would be foolish, calm, concise, direct and brief with proofs backed by science. Shukran my dear brother!!, I'm looking forward to your next video!!
You have a great approach, Hamza. I agree with you; this is a gift. Not only for us to convey the information to others but to challenge our own selves by contemplating the evidence for the existence of a god. After all, it must be that those who insist on evidence yet believe in a god are simply convinced that more evidence (yes evidence) exists for a god than for a lack of one. Great job.
MashAllah. A nice opening and rage setting. Looking forward to future videos.
Very clear mashaAllah, looking forward to seeing more of this work inshaAllah.
Really this is very good you can say program or try to explain this kind of people about from our side I like very much Jazakallah
Ma Sha Allah...
Where and what is your evidence?????
In the next video.
Are you on the Atheist's side or the Muslim side? Go hug an atheist??
The Prophet Muhammad (Allah bless him and give him peace) came to guide atheists to Islam, and that requires developing friendships with them.
☪️ancer
Plz listen to Harris sultan
Harris sultan is brick
@@DoItNowTimeFlies but right
Yeah, well, try to tell this "fairy tale" to the governments of Saudi Arabía, Yemen, Iran, Pakistan, Chechnya or any other government with muslim majority population and see how appreciative they will be of your message.
Have you checked out the other videos in the series. Specifically about the Contigency Argument?
Killing people over cartoons is dangerously irrational. Any religion that denies freedom of speech is worth fighting against. Truth does not fear dissent.
try going to France and burning their flag or using the flag as toilet paper. Tell me how far your freedom of speech right 'they' will allow you to exercise.
@@freeyourmind7538 you get killed for cartoons and you don't get killed for burning the flag in France. But please, enlighten us
@@kilianp123 not every Muslim will kill you for drawing cartoons but there is always one just as there could always be one hardcore patriotic dude ready to kill you for mocking his/her land.
I'm not saying one is right over the other.
Still I think you MISSED the point, death or no death, if you or France say freedom of speech is an absolute right but deny the right of mocking their/your flag is incoherent. If done so then you could face punishment.
@@freeyourmind7538 you do realise that the freedom of speech in France is not always comparable to other countries. I'm not sure what absolut freedom of speech even means. In a functioning state there are always limits to it.
It would be helpful to this conversation to describe what you think freedom of speech is
@@freeyourmind7538 and punishment by death and punishment by a fine are worlds apart in terms of morality
I think that atheist are pointing out what isn't rational. Not just about your brand of religion, but all brands of religion. I call them brands for a reason. Why? because all claim to be the right brand, but without telling you why. Well the best they can do is say I'm true, you'll just have to believe me. Does a rational person accept that as rational with any other belief?
I think what you’re going to find in these videos is the “why” Islam is rational, and that it’s a fallacy of equivocation to say all religions claim to be true without providing evidence, that Islam is the exception. Hamza is giving a specifically Islamic response, not a general response for all religions. But don’t take my word for it, check out the videos as they come out and judge for yourself. :)
@@AhmedHassan-fh4ec I think that's what all religions claim. Isn't it? That was my point. Now Do rational people use one standard of belief? Do rational people make exceptions to that standard? Of course not that wouldn't be rational.
Not interested in an internet debate with a stranger but I would argue that Islam is different. It doesn’t require the belief in a complex trinity with acceptance of the son of the Creater as God to be saved. It’s much more nuanced, if you are willing to look at it. When you say it’s a brand of let’s say water like Fiji water we would say it is water itself. It’s what the native Americans call the Creater. It’s what the Hindus called their main God, it’s the common thread in basically every group of humans that has existed. It is who Jesus prayed to and Moses and countless others that are not mentioned by name in the Quran. What’s the reason for this common thread in (almost )every people from African tribes to the aborigines to the inca? I guess you would see evolution or some other advantage in natural selection. Perhaps. I am not convinced. Or what is the evolutionary advantage to guilt? Still trying to figure it out myself. In the end, honestly as I started with, not really interested in an internet argument but I hope we can both reflect and think on each other’s ideas. Peace.
Would you say that the studies that showed efficacy of the Pfizer or moderna vaccine based on a P value of 0.05 - signifying 2 standard deviations against the wild type covid - demonstrated that they are efficacious. And someone took the position that it is not the case. If the studies are repeated with a meta analysis and yet again show the same result, with the same p value, would you not feel the burden of proof is on the one who argues against its efficacy? Consider where you are in the grand scheme of peoples? Are you the outlier sitting 2,3,4 standard deviations from all humans in history or those who believe in a God. Honestly an agnostic view seems more reasonable to an outright atheistic view point to me.
@@KJ-rm3je If you're required to believe, shouldn't that belief be held to the same standards as your other beliefs. If not it is not rational. I also think that our natural wonderment is mistaken for a god. We all have that, it's called human nature. The difference is that some invent an explanation. This is evident by the countless number of gods that have been invented throughout recorded history. Only one of those inventions is your god.