Is one of the 7 Military Classics a fake?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 10

  • @ME-hm7zm
    @ME-hm7zm 2 роки тому +1

    Hm, pretty sure that 7 Classics compilation was one of my textbooks in college; now I want to see if I still have it so I can check the dialogue one out with this in mind.

  • @世鹏江
    @世鹏江 2 роки тому +5

    李卫公问对(唐太宗和李靖)这个我中学的时候古文考试还节选了其中一个章节出题,它里边有这个奇正的思想。中国的部分兵书它有很多神秘化的地方,有很抽象的描述,比如李卫公问对和太公兵法,但是又有另一些兵书,就非常朴实,比如武经总要和戚继光的绩效新书,这到底一类真一类假还是仅仅是风格不同确实很难分辨。而且中国还存在文人假托古人的名字写书。

    • @blackcatpack
      @blackcatpack 10 місяців тому +1

      孙子兵法是对军事是政治的延续这一真理的证明,绩效新书是从0教你当将军。这两本是最好的兵书。

  • @josuesepulveda6850
    @josuesepulveda6850 Рік тому

    Great clip.

  • @mrspeigle1
    @mrspeigle1 2 роки тому +4

    Omg read that book back in highschool 😳

    • @thescholar-general5975
      @thescholar-general5975  2 роки тому +3

      I wish that I got to read military classics in high school!

    • @mrspeigle1
      @mrspeigle1 2 роки тому +1

      @@thescholar-general5975 it was one I picked up at the book store, was familiar with the art of war and was intrigued, found it on the shelf and it came home with me.

  • @speedgears1236
    @speedgears1236 2 роки тому +1

    Hello
    Just saw you on Mathew Jensen. I love history so I subscribed

    • @thescholar-general5975
      @thescholar-general5975  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks for checking things out! My specialization is Chinese and Inner Asian history but I branch out to some other topics sometimes as well.

  • @elshebactm6769
    @elshebactm6769 2 роки тому +1

    🤠👍🏿