Very good point......... This discovery can also question and dismantle the theory that only people of African origin or descent produce RH negative blood.
Thank you for sharing!!! I am half Moroccan and half african American, the real african American who been in U.S from 1600's or longer,when i did dna test yes of coarse i have sub Saharian african but also north african, Semitic from the Arabian peninsula, Spanish from spain, ahkanazi jew from Ukraine, Italy and etc. Outside of black on the african American side had British and ireland. Yea very mixed up!!! Would not change what i have, very interesting unique mix...
Now I understand why when the name Berbers was spoken, most couldn't distinguish the Moors from Africans or Arabs. A mixture of cultures does make a lot of sense. Now the mystery unfolds.
The Original Amazigh "Berbers" were not black , neither were the Ancient Egyptians . the oldest pre dynastic mummies are nick name ginger . The Tuareg had slaves called the Ikelan & later mixed with them . Blacks were brought to the Maghreb during the Arab slave trade . Berbers have a high percentage of Rh- blood , which did not come from sub Saharan "black" africans . Also 19% of sub Saharan africans DNA comes from an extinct species that's not present in Caucasian or asians .
@@mziwethumbotho3354 the "berbers" you find in west africa have never been considered as berber, they just adopted berber culture because they were invaded and occupied by north africa numerous times through many dynasties such as the almoravids, Saadis and Alaouites North African dynasties
@mohamedrh4093 that's what happened when you talk about African history when you are not African. You always assume, just let Africans talk about themselves as you we let you talk about your desert dwellers people
Great. May want to add a little correction, northern Nigerian not Eastern as eastern Nigerian are more sub-Saharan African. The Berber are closer to the Fula tribe in Northern Nigeria. Thanks a lot for the video ❤❤❤ love from nigeria
Doctor Allen H. Godbey and other researchers suggest that Judaism was present among the African tribes from which many slaves were taken to America. Godbey argues that because Jews were often persecuted, they were more likely to be captured and sold as slaves. Consequently, it's likely that many slaves brought to America had Jewish ancestry and retained some Jewish customs. This idea, supported by scholars like Maurice Delafosse, has been embraced by some educated Black Americans to assert that Judaism was a traditional religion among Africans brought to America as slaves.
Not seeing it. Most African Americans are from West Africa. Very far distance from Egypt. Where many dispersed Jews were sold into slavery and many sold themselves into slavery. This also led to a large Jewish population in Egypt and Libya later as is evident in modern history. The Bible says they were sold in Egypt not Africa. 10.2% of African Americans carried haplogroup L1b and 19.8% of African Americans carried haplogroup L2a. Stefflova et al. (2011) states: "Ancestry from Guinea Bissau-Mali-Senegal-Sierra Leone predominates in other United States African American populations compared to Philadelphia alone (43% vs. The team started by looking at the average genetic ancestry of the three largest groups in the United States: European Americans, African-Americans, and Latinos. Those categories are based on how 23andMe customers defined themselves. But as you might expect in a country where different groups of people have been meeting and mixing for hundreds of years, the genetic lines between the groups are quite blurred. "You see all of those different ancestries in each of these groups," Bryc explains. The average African-American genome, for example, is 73.2% African, 24% European, and 0.8% Native American, the team reports online today in The American Journal of Human Genetics. Latinos, meanwhile, carry an average of 18% Native American ancestry, 65.1% European ancestry (mostly from the Iberian Peninsula), and 6.2% African ancestry.
@@rickdavis2710 Sahelian Jews historically known as Jews of the Bilad al-Sudan (Judeo-Arabic: אַהַל יַהוּדּ בִּלַדּ אַל סוּדָּן, romanized: ʾahal yahūd bilad al-sūdān) describes West African Jewish communities connected to known Jewish communities who migrated to West Africa as merchants for trading opportunities
“Accurate information” is laughable, We do not descend from Arabs, we have existed in North Africa for 20,000+ years before Arab culture ever began in the Bronze Age. Both Linguistics and Genetics affirms this, as the most common paternal haplogroup of Arabs is J1 meanwhile the haplogroup of pure Berbers was always E1b1b1b. Pure Berbers were always 30-50% Iberomaurusian (Indigenous Moroccan Hunter Gatherer) and 50-70% West Eurasian. This distortion and erasure of our history is disgusting.
This is a deeply flawed narrative that doesn't mesh with non-biblical evidence. A lot of harm has come from pretending Abram was a Semite, when his tribe were Indo-Europeans and the Semites a late arrival to the Mediterranean
@Alazar654 Hardly. Blue is still the color of God's favorite's eyes, and still shows up where you'd least expect if you'd bought into cult marxist lies, albe8t sometimes looking more deep purple due to DNA influences
everything in this video is straight inaccurate and wrong if not a deliberate lie: It purposely negates the existence of the majority berber group who are the Chleuh in Morocco and who speak/use tachelhit language/script. They're almost 30 millions, and instead focuses on a minority group the tuaregs "black berbers" who were this video's only subject do not even live in north africa but mostly in the Sahel (they don't use tifinagh but tamashaq). This is wrong as most berbers in north africa: Chleuh, Kabyle, Rif, Ghomara, Chawiya who are the majority are not black skinned at all and have always looked the way they do today.
@@mohamedrh4093 Ancient Egypt started with Black Africans, and not just with the 25th Dynasty as some Egyptologists, and history books would have us believe. But now look at Egypt today. Arab decendents have taken over Egypt civilization, erasing Black Acient Egypt. So the Berbers of Old, never was Ancient Blacks you state? But of a lighter shade still living in Northern Africa today? What happened to Ham's lineage who had named cities after their sons in that same area? Misraim was one of Ham's sons names meaning; EGYPT. Well I guess those citizens in Egypt was never Black Africans RIGHT?
“Accurate information” is laughable, We do not descend from Arabs, we have existed in North Africa for 20,000+ years before Arab culture ever began in the Bronze Age. Both Linguistics and Genetics affirms this, as the most common paternal haplogroup of Arabs is J1 meanwhile the haplogroup of pure Berbers was always E1b1b1b. Pure Berbers were always 30-50% Iberomaurusian (Indigenous Moroccan Hunter Gatherer) and 50-70% West Eurasian. This distortion and erasure of our history is disgusting.
So this story told about the Berbers in the beginning, and how race mixing came later from other semitic tribes does make sense. The Iberian Peninsula of Europe was Conquered by the Moors. The Moors was a mixture of Northern Africans, and Arabs in the beginning. When the Arab Conquest came afterwards, and they crossed the Gibraltar Straits into Europe and ruled for over 800 years. Blacks ruled Europe along with Arabs from 711AD to 1492. So Christopher Columbus watched as Free Black Africans ruled his Spaniard country.
@user-jt8vj1vm6y THIS UA-cam VIDEO TITLED; The Moors. Moors were people who lived in North Africa and this word is used generally by European sometimes to denote Muslims or Black people. However, once Iberia was captured from the Visigoths during the Middle Ages, they began to move more and more into modern-day Spain and Portugal.
@user-jt8vj1vm6y Berbers (Arabic: بربر) or the Berber peoples, also called by their endonym Amazigh (/æməˈzɪɡ/) or Imazighen (Berber languages: ⵉⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵏ, ⵎⵣⵗⵏ, romanized: Imaziɣen; singular: Amaziɣ, ⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖ, ⵎⵣⵗ; Arabic: أمازيغ), are a diverse grouping of distinct ethnic groups indigenous to North Africa who predate the arrival of Arabs in the Arab migrations to the Maghreb.[28][29][30][31] Their main connections are identified by their usage of Berber languages, most of them mutually unintelligible,[30][32] which are part of the Afroasiatic language family.
@user-jt8vj1vm6y Origins and history The Amazigh have inhabited North Africa since at least 5,000 BCE, and possibly even earlier. They are spread across the region, from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic coast, and from Egypt to the Canary Islands. The ancient populations of Numidian, Mauri, and Libu are generally considered to be the same as modern Berbers.
@user-jt8vj1vm6y What did ancient Numidians look like?  If what you're asking is “were the Numidian auxiliaries black?” then no, they weren't what most Americans would consider black. They probably looked a lot like modern Tunisians, Libyans, and Algerians - what most Americans would call “Middle Eastern” although they were not Middle Eastern but North African.
the berbers are the arabic denomination of a great native nations who inhabited north africa until now who called themselves AMAZIGH PEOPLE. yOUR video is an attempt to establish a foreign origins to the amazighs people who are the true natives of north africa. We the amazigh , we are neither from persia, nore from saudi arabia, nore from nigeria. Hyrodutus mentionned us and our name AMAZIGH centuries ago before the arabic chjronicles called us berbers which a temptation to take out our rooted denomination to dominate us more. your video is a bs far from the truth.
There is no one origin and there is no one ethnic group. I think you n very distant past this area was dominated by every kind of race and there was ethnic mixing which resulted in more than one ethnicity and origin that history was lost
The Narrator is completely wrong, BERBER ( Those who wore beards ) were Europeans barbarians, and barbarians were uncivilized, The Moors were Civilized, so the Moors couldn't have been barbarians, because the Moorish ( Moors ) Civilized Europe. The Original people that inhabited North Africa were Imazighens ( Amazigh ) and they were dark complexed , not of European stock. Barbarians =Berber = Barbar =Barbary =Barba all of the same nature.
“Accurate information” is laughable, We do not descend from Arabs, we have existed in North Africa for 20,000+ years before Arab culture ever began in the Bronze Age. Both Linguistics and Genetics affirms this, as the most common paternal haplogroup of Arabs is J1 meanwhile the haplogroup of pure Berbers was always E1b1b1b. Pure Berbers were always 30-50% Iberomaurusian (Indigenous Moroccan Hunter Gatherer) and 50-70% West Eurasian. This distortion and erasure of our history is disgusting.
@@GreaterAfghanistanMovementYou are highlighting your ignorance. It is clearly apparent that your knowledge of genetics is severely limited. Having a African haplogroup alone does not make one African anymore than the millions of African American males who carry european haplogroups makes them european.
Berbers also have a high ratio of RH negative blood. As do the Basque peoples.
Very good point......... This discovery can also question and dismantle the theory that only people of African origin or descent produce RH negative blood.
My family and ancestors have never bowed before the Arab or the European God and never will.
Thank you for sharing!!! I am half Moroccan and half african American, the real african American who been in U.S from 1600's or longer,when i did dna test yes of coarse i have sub Saharian african but also north african, Semitic from the Arabian peninsula, Spanish from spain, ahkanazi jew from Ukraine, Italy and etc. Outside of black on the african American side had British and ireland. Yea very mixed up!!! Would not change what i have, very interesting unique mix...
I love this channel, I’ve learned so much from here and kudos to all those who put in so much work to put this all together. Well done!
Now I understand why when the name Berbers was spoken, most couldn't distinguish the Moors from Africans or Arabs. A mixture of cultures does make a lot of sense. Now the mystery unfolds.
Blacks never ruled Europe.
Very good point and well explained.
@@johnnytorres398 And here it is over 35 years later, and my teachers would say, "You're To Detailed"!🤭🤭🤭🙄🙄👍
@@Cold913 You and I both!
Fantastic pictures. Who made them?
Il y a beaucoup trop de fausses informations, c'est grave
Could you please do Balkan people. I would be nice to hear about their origin.
The Original Amazigh
"Berbers" were not black , neither were the Ancient Egyptians . the oldest pre dynastic mummies are nick name ginger .
The Tuareg had slaves called the Ikelan & later mixed with them . Blacks were brought to the Maghreb during the Arab slave trade .
Berbers have a high percentage of Rh- blood , which did not come from sub Saharan "black" africans . Also 19% of sub Saharan africans DNA comes from an extinct species that's not present in Caucasian or asians .
Lies at it's best Berber are found in west and east Africa and they are not Caucasian
@@mziwethumbotho3354
Hahahahaha 😂😂😂 keep telling yourself that Kang !!!
@@mziwethumbotho3354 the "berbers" you find in west africa have never been considered as berber, they just adopted berber culture because they were invaded and occupied by north africa numerous times through many dynasties such as the almoravids, Saadis and Alaouites North African dynasties
@mohamedrh4093 that's what happened when you talk about African history when you are not African. You always assume, just let Africans talk about themselves as you we let you talk about your desert dwellers people
@@mziwethumbotho3354
The Sahara is one of the Biggest deserts in the world !
Black people originate south of it ! = Sub Saharan African .
Great. May want to add a little correction, northern Nigerian not Eastern as eastern Nigerian are more sub-Saharan African. The Berber are closer to the Fula tribe in Northern Nigeria. Thanks a lot for the video ❤❤❤ love from nigeria
Somali Language is also the Same Origin of Berber.
Doctor Allen H. Godbey and other researchers suggest that Judaism was present among the African tribes from which many slaves were taken to America. Godbey argues that because Jews were often persecuted, they were more likely to be captured and sold as slaves. Consequently, it's likely that many slaves brought to America had Jewish ancestry and retained some Jewish customs. This idea, supported by scholars like Maurice Delafosse, has been embraced by some educated Black Americans to assert that Judaism was a traditional religion among Africans brought to America as slaves.
Not seeing it. Most African Americans are from West Africa. Very far distance from Egypt. Where many dispersed Jews were sold into slavery and many sold themselves into slavery. This also led to a large Jewish population in Egypt and Libya later as is evident in modern history. The Bible says they were sold in Egypt not Africa. 10.2% of African Americans carried haplogroup L1b and 19.8% of African Americans carried haplogroup L2a. Stefflova et al. (2011) states: "Ancestry from Guinea Bissau-Mali-Senegal-Sierra Leone predominates in other United States African American populations compared to Philadelphia alone (43% vs.
The team started by looking at the average genetic ancestry of the three largest groups in the United States: European Americans, African-Americans, and Latinos. Those categories are based on how 23andMe customers defined themselves. But as you might expect in a country where different groups of people have been meeting and mixing for hundreds of years, the genetic lines between the groups are quite blurred.
"You see all of those different ancestries in each of these groups," Bryc explains. The average African-American genome, for example, is 73.2% African, 24% European, and 0.8% Native American, the team reports online today in The American Journal of Human Genetics. Latinos, meanwhile, carry an average of 18% Native American ancestry, 65.1% European ancestry (mostly from the Iberian Peninsula), and 6.2% African ancestry.
@@rickdavis2710 Sahelian Jews historically known as Jews of the Bilad al-Sudan (Judeo-Arabic: אַהַל יַהוּדּ בִּלַדּ אַל סוּדָּן, romanized: ʾahal yahūd bilad al-sūdān) describes West African Jewish communities connected to known Jewish communities who migrated to West Africa as merchants for trading opportunities
I like this channel because of the accurate information as I fact check your research. Great job Sir
Wrong picture for the Sephardic Jews
“Accurate information” is laughable, We do not descend from Arabs, we have existed in North Africa for 20,000+ years before Arab culture ever began in the Bronze Age. Both Linguistics and Genetics affirms this, as the most common paternal haplogroup of Arabs is J1 meanwhile the haplogroup of pure Berbers was always E1b1b1b. Pure Berbers were always 30-50% Iberomaurusian (Indigenous Moroccan Hunter Gatherer) and 50-70% West Eurasian. This distortion and erasure of our history is disgusting.
We arent decendants of middle eastern people lol..😂 when white imazighen were in north africa arabs didnt even excist
Truth !!!
We are not berber But We Are Amazighan Peoples.
jus think of the Iber is used in it rather than the greek brand. Stay Amazigh'ng! :)
GLORY2JESUS blessings beautiful souls
Not true! The imazigen are the native! The Toeareg berbers mixt with other tribes and not native
This is a deeply flawed narrative that doesn't mesh with non-biblical evidence. A lot of harm has come from pretending Abram was a Semite, when his tribe were Indo-Europeans and the Semites a late arrival to the Mediterranean
Everybody wants to be the green ranger lol
@Alazar654 Hardly. Blue is still the color of God's favorite's eyes, and still shows up where you'd least expect if you'd bought into cult marxist lies, albe8t sometimes looking more deep purple due to DNA influences
Same meaning vs the word Amharic it is Free People.
everything in this video is straight inaccurate and wrong if not a deliberate lie: It purposely negates the existence of the majority berber group who are the Chleuh in Morocco and who speak/use tachelhit language/script. They're almost 30 millions, and instead focuses on a minority group the tuaregs "black berbers" who were this video's only subject do not even live in north africa but mostly in the Sahel (they don't use tifinagh but tamashaq). This is wrong as most berbers in north africa: Chleuh, Kabyle, Rif, Ghomara, Chawiya who are the majority are not black skinned at all and have always looked the way they do today.
@@mohamedrh4093 Ancient Egypt started with Black Africans, and not just with the 25th Dynasty as some Egyptologists, and history books would have us believe. But now look at Egypt today. Arab decendents have taken over Egypt civilization, erasing Black Acient Egypt. So the Berbers of Old, never was Ancient Blacks you state? But of a lighter shade still living in Northern Africa today? What happened to Ham's lineage who had named cities after their sons in that same area? Misraim was one of Ham's sons names meaning; EGYPT. Well I guess those citizens in Egypt was never Black Africans RIGHT?
“Accurate information” is laughable, We do not descend from Arabs, we have existed in North Africa for 20,000+ years before Arab culture ever began in the Bronze Age. Both Linguistics and Genetics affirms this, as the most common paternal haplogroup of Arabs is J1 meanwhile the haplogroup of pure Berbers was always E1b1b1b. Pure Berbers were always 30-50% Iberomaurusian (Indigenous Moroccan Hunter Gatherer) and 50-70% West Eurasian. This distortion and erasure of our history is disgusting.
So this story told about the Berbers in the beginning, and how race mixing came later from other semitic tribes does make sense. The Iberian Peninsula of Europe was Conquered by the Moors. The Moors was a mixture of Northern Africans, and Arabs in the beginning. When the Arab Conquest came afterwards, and they crossed the Gibraltar Straits into Europe and ruled for over 800 years. Blacks ruled Europe along with Arabs from 711AD to 1492. So Christopher Columbus watched as Free Black Africans ruled his Spaniard country.
Blacks never ruled Europe.
.
@user-jt8vj1vm6y THIS UA-cam VIDEO TITLED; The Moors. Moors were people who lived in North Africa and this word is used generally by European sometimes to denote Muslims or Black people. However, once Iberia was captured from the Visigoths during the Middle Ages, they began to move more and more into modern-day Spain and Portugal.
@user-jt8vj1vm6y Berbers (Arabic: بربر) or the Berber peoples, also called by their endonym Amazigh (/æməˈzɪɡ/) or Imazighen (Berber languages: ⵉⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵏ, ⵎⵣⵗⵏ, romanized: Imaziɣen; singular: Amaziɣ, ⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖ, ⵎⵣⵗ; Arabic: أمازيغ), are a diverse grouping of distinct ethnic groups indigenous to North Africa who predate the arrival of Arabs in the Arab migrations to the Maghreb.[28][29][30][31] Their main connections are identified by their usage of Berber languages, most of them mutually unintelligible,[30][32] which are part of the Afroasiatic language family.
@user-jt8vj1vm6y Origins and history
The Amazigh have inhabited North Africa since at least 5,000 BCE, and possibly even earlier. They are spread across the region, from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic coast, and from Egypt to the Canary Islands. The ancient populations of Numidian, Mauri, and Libu are generally considered to be the same as modern Berbers.
@user-jt8vj1vm6y What did ancient Numidians look like?

If what you're asking is “were the Numidian auxiliaries black?” then no, they weren't what most Americans would consider black. They probably looked a lot like modern Tunisians, Libyans, and Algerians - what most Americans would call “Middle Eastern” although they were not Middle Eastern but North African.
the berbers are the arabic denomination of a great native nations who inhabited north africa until now who called themselves AMAZIGH PEOPLE. yOUR video is an attempt to establish a foreign origins to the amazighs people who are the true natives of north africa. We the amazigh , we are neither from persia, nore from saudi arabia, nore from nigeria. Hyrodutus mentionned us and our name AMAZIGH centuries ago before the arabic chjronicles called us berbers which a temptation to take out our rooted denomination to dominate us more. your video is a bs far from the truth.
There is no one origin and there is no one ethnic group. I think you n very distant past this area was dominated by every kind of race and there was ethnic mixing which resulted in more than one ethnicity and origin that history was lost
The Narrator is completely wrong, BERBER ( Those who wore beards ) were Europeans barbarians, and barbarians were uncivilized, The Moors were Civilized, so the Moors couldn't have been barbarians, because the Moorish ( Moors ) Civilized Europe. The Original people that inhabited North Africa were Imazighens ( Amazigh ) and they were dark complexed , not of European stock.
Barbarians =Berber = Barbar =Barbary =Barba all of the same nature.
“Accurate information” is laughable, We do not descend from Arabs, we have existed in North Africa for 20,000+ years before Arab culture ever began in the Bronze Age. Both Linguistics and Genetics affirms this, as the most common paternal haplogroup of Arabs is J1 meanwhile the haplogroup of pure Berbers was always E1b1b1b. Pure Berbers were always 30-50% Iberomaurusian (Indigenous Moroccan Hunter Gatherer) and 50-70% West Eurasian. This distortion and erasure of our history is disgusting.
Seriously, White Africa!?🤔🙄😒
These guys are invaders
Then why do they have African haplogroups?
@@GreaterAfghanistanMovement Not all of them do though.
@@Alazar654 80% of them do.
@@GreaterAfghanistanMovement Exactly why I said, not all of them.
@@GreaterAfghanistanMovementYou are highlighting your ignorance.
It is clearly apparent that your knowledge of genetics is severely limited.
Having a African haplogroup alone does not make one African anymore than the millions of African American males who carry european haplogroups makes them european.