The Imperial Presidents: Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson (US History EOC Review - USHC 5.3)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 38

  • @iammrbeat
    @iammrbeat 7 років тому +10

    Definitely saving this one for my students this year

  • @sonidoo5908
    @sonidoo5908 4 роки тому +1

    Well now I will not feel guilty after skipping history classes, you summarised everything thnx!

  • @stupidfrog
    @stupidfrog 7 років тому +13

    I took AP Euro last year, and I'm going to be taking AP US this year, so I've been watching these videos. From what I've seen so far, American history seems FAR more fascinating than Euro haha

    • @tomrichey
      @tomrichey  7 років тому +12

      It really depends on the topic. Some things about Euro amaze me and some things about US History amaze me... but then, elements of both bore me just as much!

    • @martell203
      @martell203 7 років тому

      Tom Richey Bore you! I find it fascinating. And really wish I'd studied Political Science & History instead of Business Administration. Now that's some boring crap!

    • @HansWurst1569
      @HansWurst1569 7 років тому +3

      Are you kidding me? The US barely has a history compaired to europe. I have no clue how you can find european history boring eventhough things actually happend and developd here. You didn't really have any impact on the world untill the end of world war 1.

  • @darkhing3
    @darkhing3 7 років тому +1

    Another good video mr richey!

    • @tomrichey
      @tomrichey  7 років тому +1

      Thanks!

    • @DonnaSnyder
      @DonnaSnyder 4 роки тому

      But why are you holding on to that coffee cup.

  • @awura2493
    @awura2493 4 роки тому

    Great video!

  • @mahf99
    @mahf99 7 років тому

    Mr. Richey, do you plan on doing more AP U.S. Government videos in the future? Great lecture!

  • @douglassauvageau7262
    @douglassauvageau7262 2 роки тому +1

    WAIT! The blithe disregard of European Interests in Latin America during this period (despite the 'Monroe Doctrine') is a dis-service to comprehensive history.

    • @douglassauvageau7262
      @douglassauvageau7262 2 роки тому +1

      Trans-Pacific opportunities during this period placed the United States in the position of that puppy in legendary nursery-stories who saw his reflection in the waters below the bridge he was crossing. Carrying a bone in his mouth, he saw another dog carrying what might have been a more desirable bone. Abandoning the bone he was carrying, our erstwhile mutt attacked that reflection to not only lose the object of his ambition, but to also lose the bone he had originally.

    • @douglassauvageau7262
      @douglassauvageau7262 2 роки тому

      Our Philippines misadventure was an ill-begotten attempt to 'join-the-club' of Dutch, British, French, and other monied interests intent upon exploiting East Asian opportunities. Latin America was right there in our back yard.

  • @markobarisic5149
    @markobarisic5149 7 років тому

    Wasn't Suez canal built by the French?Correct me if I'm wrong but i think that the British staunchly opposed the project because it would threaten their trade influence.

    • @Magnus181
      @Magnus181 7 років тому

      They picked it up later

  • @jennifergammons8095
    @jennifergammons8095 2 місяці тому

    are you a pastor also, looks like you're in a church?

  • @Rikard_A
    @Rikard_A 7 років тому

    The européen countries should have shut down, the US hard, by blockading every US port, and had our own open policy in the US. Carving up the USA.

  • @redjirachi1
    @redjirachi1 5 років тому

    McKinley wasn't an imperial president?

  • @jorgemansilla7543
    @jorgemansilla7543 4 роки тому

    This wasn’t very helpful