Ranking EVERY Super Bowl Winner! (1966-2023)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
  • Ranking EVERY Super Bowl Winnner! (1966-2023)
    Check out our other channels:
    NFL Mundo / mundonfl
    NFL Brasil / nflbrasiloficial
    NFL UK / @nflukireland
    NFL Fantasy / nflfantasyfootball
    NFL Play Football / playfootball
    NFL Rush / nflrush
    NFL Films / nflfilms
    NFL Network / nflnetwork
    NFL / nfl
    #NFL #Football #AmericanFootball

КОМЕНТАРІ • 959

  • @king_supreme1102
    @king_supreme1102 7 місяців тому +415

    NFL Throwback is educating everybody on NFL history

    • @dancolonna6590
      @dancolonna6590 7 місяців тому +11

      Accept the Washington team

    • @raymondsmith2040
      @raymondsmith2040 7 місяців тому +14

      dancolonna6590 ikr they were called (and I often still call them) the REDSKINS!

    • @jaceking5938
      @jaceking5938 7 місяців тому +3

      ​@dancolonna6590 no one offered..

    • @kaisers.4988
      @kaisers.4988 7 місяців тому +5

      If they ever had a course about NFL history in High School or college I’d take it.

    • @mattwinston1745
      @mattwinston1745 7 місяців тому +6

      Best channel on UA-cam

  • @johnshields6852
    @johnshields6852 7 місяців тому +294

    Eli escaping the sack with guys holding onto his jersey, somehow escapes and gets the pass off with the Helmut catch at the end, are you fking kidding me.

  • @JaxsonCampbell-t5x
    @JaxsonCampbell-t5x 7 місяців тому +81

    I wish that madden had these historical teams would definitely make the game worth buying!

    • @JACQUEZJOHNSON23
      @JACQUEZJOHNSON23 7 місяців тому +3

      U know ea lazy

    • @M1lesJames
      @M1lesJames 7 місяців тому +3

      Back in the day they did. I ran the 89 49ers all the time

    • @devondawkins5492
      @devondawkins5492 5 місяців тому

      ​@@M1lesJamesthey just didn't have the rosters. They had correct #s but no names 😂

    • @jcoolguy1548
      @jcoolguy1548 2 місяці тому +1

      Fr. If 2K can do it, then Madden can do it. Put all-time teams too while they're at it.

    • @JaxsonCampbell-t5x
      @JaxsonCampbell-t5x 2 місяці тому

      @@jcoolguy1548 I agree with this completely even though my all time team is worse than most besides 3-4 cause I’m a Texans fan we have barely even been in this league but playing with prime Watson,Andre,dhop,Arian foster,jj watt,Kareem Jackson,Mario Williams,demeco Ryan’s,tyrann mathieu,Whitney mercilus and Jonathan Joseph sounds really fun

  • @greenbay3164
    @greenbay3164 7 місяців тому +26

    Find a Weakness for the 85 Bears you say?
    Dan Marino 😂

    • @DaDitka
      @DaDitka 7 місяців тому +2

      Absolutely. And the stubbornness of Buddy Ryan in the first half of that game really did them in. But I'll happily take 15-1 and a trophy!

    • @PEN-N-PAL
      @PEN-N-PAL 4 місяці тому +1

      @greenbay3164
      *Dude, it was one game with the Dolphins playing at home as though it was their Super Bowl to preserved the undefeated season and the Bears playing 3 quarters of the game with their back-up QB. Stop Sounding Stupid.*

    • @TitoJSmith
      @TitoJSmith 4 місяці тому

      Absolutely Correct Actually.​@@PEN-N-PAL

    • @SpiralSine6
      @SpiralSine6 2 місяці тому +1

      The weakness? A cheap shot from Green Bay that kept it to just one Super Bowl 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @ltod2
    @ltod2 7 місяців тому +121

    The 86 NY Giants should be top 10,that defense was dominant in playoffs cmon now

    • @jambler15
      @jambler15 7 місяців тому +8

      I'd put 86 Giants between #10-#15.
      Also 89 49ers should be top #5. Really #10 is too low.

    • @rpc717
      @rpc717 7 місяців тому +3

      Agreed. That was a stretch of three years of teams with legitimate claims of being the best ever.

  • @brianfarnell9833
    @brianfarnell9833 7 місяців тому +40

    1989 49ers should be higher than #10

    • @kenw2225
      @kenw2225 7 місяців тому +2

      Nfl hates the niners for being the greatest franchise in the nfl. They rig games for steelers , pats and now kc to try to bring them up to niners level

    • @gabrielmuniz64
      @gabrielmuniz64 7 місяців тому +1

      As cowboys fan, they are #1 imo

    • @legrandfromage6450
      @legrandfromage6450 7 місяців тому +2

      72 and 73 Dolphins are the only AFC teams that belongs in the top 10. Madden's Raiders are ranked about 20 spots too high. 78 Steelers are vastly overrated, as usual.

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому +1

      I would say no worse than fifth

    • @TitoJSmith
      @TitoJSmith 4 місяці тому

      ​@@gabrielmuniz64Wow, Niner fan here, thanks for that recognition despite the rivalry between both organizations!👍👊

  • @siriush100
    @siriush100 7 місяців тому +32

    The fact that the NFC won 13 straight Super Bowls from 1984 to 1996 is one of the most incredible stats in football history in my opinion.

    • @benferris149
      @benferris149 7 місяців тому +3

      It’s because there wasn’t a salary cap. The original NFL became the NFC and thus it had the biggest markets.

    • @yomamasofat77
      @yomamasofat77 7 місяців тому +5

      I remember when people were saying that they needed to stop having AFC vs NFC so the Super Bowl would be Cowboys vs 49ers lol

    • @happybeingmiserable4668
      @happybeingmiserable4668 7 місяців тому +1

      @@benferris149 the Steelers, Browns and Colts were NFL teams prior to the merger and switched to the AFC after...also the Pats and Chiefs constantly winning the AFC the past decade makes the salary cap argument moot.

    • @paquinraino8180
      @paquinraino8180 7 місяців тому

      @eingmiserable4668 He is talking about back then, not now. but at the beginning outside the Steelers and the Rams, most AFC teams couldn't win in the SuperBowl, that's why I always said that the Bills loosing 4 times in a row is more a reflection about the AFC than anything

    • @benferris149
      @benferris149 7 місяців тому

      @@happybeingmiserable4668 the modern Pats and Chiefs aren’t beneficiaries of a lack of a salary cap. And the Steelers, Browns, and Colts were all smaller market teams; their switch could’ve only added to the financial gap between the conferences (though of course the Steelers did have a lot of success before the AFC’s losing streak).

  • @Jeremy_theGent
    @Jeremy_theGent 7 місяців тому +150

    Uh uh. I know you're not putting the 07 Giants next to last, not with that defense.
    It doesn't matter though, you'd rather be the worst winning team than the best losing team.

    • @Jeremy_theGent
      @Jeremy_theGent 7 місяців тому +7

      @@theog2306 I'm okay with putting the 11 team at the bottom, honestly. They went all the way because the defense peaked at the right time and Eli played out of his mind.

    • @LiamDeege
      @LiamDeege 7 місяців тому +14

      The 11 Giants are the worst without a doubt.

    • @KillenEMsoftly
      @KillenEMsoftly 7 місяців тому +13

      these are super bowl teams, nothing wrong with being last lol

    • @slaktheking69
      @slaktheking69 7 місяців тому +2

      lol not even a top 100 defense of all time 😂😂😂

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому

      @@LiamDeegeEither them or the 1970 Colts.
      Those are the two worst in my opinion.

  • @cbod14
    @cbod14 7 місяців тому +97

    The 86 Giants at 21? You could make an argument, & don't start Bears fans, that their postseason defensive stats were more impressive than the Bears of the previous season. They outscored San Francisco & Washington by a score of 66-3. I repeat 66-3. They shut down and blew out the 49ers and shut out The Redskins. Then then held John Elway to 20 points. I would say that is more impressive than beating Dieter Brock & Tony Eason.

    • @ariici
      @ariici 7 місяців тому +7

      taking a shit is more impressive than beating dieter brock and tony Eason

    • @j.a.greene3523
      @j.a.greene3523 7 місяців тому +10

      It was more that the Bears Defense was dominant all throughout that season. Minus the season opener and the famous MNF game, they only had one game where they gave up 20 or more points.

    • @joewagner3770
      @joewagner3770 7 місяців тому +20

      Bears gave up 10 total points in playoffs you gave up double that in one game- pipe down

    • @ariici
      @ariici 7 місяців тому +2

      @@joewagner3770 aww bears fan mad

    • @cbod14
      @cbod14 7 місяців тому +6

      @@joewagner3770 READ WHO THE COMPETITION WAS. The Bears saw Tony Eason. The Giants saw John Elway. Maybe you should pipe down. Funny The Bears never won squat again while The Giants won another Super Bowl. Pipe down indeed.

  • @CharlesAlexanderAllred
    @CharlesAlexanderAllred 7 місяців тому +12

    I don’t understand this ranking system, but enjoyed all the recapping nonetheless

  • @barbaracaroll
    @barbaracaroll 7 місяців тому +27

    In 2011 Eli Manning had one of the greatest seasons in NFL history in fact his single season playoff yards record still stands

    • @j.a.greene3523
      @j.a.greene3523 7 місяців тому +8

      The list is based on regular season performance too. They still have the worst record, and point differential, of any SB winning team.

    • @barbaracaroll
      @barbaracaroll 7 місяців тому +5

      Did you read my post it's factual so it's not up for your debate understand

    • @PassRoyalr
      @PassRoyalr 7 місяців тому +6

      yeah because he played 4 playoff games. Brady would have the record if he didn't have a bye

    • @barbaracaroll
      @barbaracaroll 7 місяців тому +5

      Brady played ,4 playoff games in 2020 season Stafford for 2021 season Mahomes for 2023 season why can't you accept fact

    • @joelskillz4875
      @joelskillz4875 7 місяців тому

      And still defeated TB12 in what is statistically the greatest season of his career in 2011-12
      @@j.a.greene3523

  • @tylerlarsen1842
    @tylerlarsen1842 7 місяців тому +7

    The 1989 49ers got severely disrespected here. They're a top 5 team all-time without a doubt, and I would rank them in my top 2. When the playoffs hit that season, it was as if that team ascended to heights beyond comprehension.

    • @DaDitka
      @DaDitka 7 місяців тому +1

      They had a MONSTER team that year. I can see why you say that.

  • @lzv6990
    @lzv6990 7 місяців тому +10

    I do love the fact the best teams are pretty much all pre-free agency and salary cap teams. Fans under the age of 40 have no idea how stacked teams were before player movement.

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому +3

      The mid 90’s Niners who won it all in 94, and had a 1995 team that had ten pro bowlers and seven all pros that could’ve repeated if Steve Young doesn’t get hurt were probably the last team of that generation.
      Seven players named first or second team all pro is a lot, and ten pro bowlers is uncommon too.

    • @johnphelan4215
      @johnphelan4215 2 місяці тому

      And fewer teams and smaller rosters. Hundreds of players now would not be in the league back then.

  • @j.a.greene3523
    @j.a.greene3523 7 місяців тому +8

    Having the 1989 49ers at #10 is criminal. They’re at least top 3, along with 72 Dolphins and 85 Bears.

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому +2

      I’d say the 1989 Niners, 1985 Bears, 1972 Dolphins, 1975 Steelers and 1991 Skins are the top five in whatever order you want.

    • @j.a.greene3523
      @j.a.greene3523 7 місяців тому +2

      @@fortynights1513
      1989 49ers are the most complete team, in my opinion. 1972 is the best season, of course, and 1985 Bears was the most entertaining.

    • @InYourHouse316
      @InYourHouse316 7 місяців тому

      Thank you for this comment! I was hoping others would see their idiocy of having them ranked at 10

    • @johnrocha3946
      @johnrocha3946 7 місяців тому

      Prime Montana and Rice

  • @giannisakoumpo
    @giannisakoumpo 7 місяців тому +43

    2021 rams at 52 is actually insane

    • @LiamDeege
      @LiamDeege 7 місяців тому +11

      They should be at least in the top 20 or 15.

    • @theogpill
      @theogpill 7 місяців тому +27

      they just disrespected basically the modern teams

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому

      A bit low perhaps

    • @anthropomorphicOrange
      @anthropomorphicOrange 7 місяців тому +12

      I disagree. You have to keep in mind that these are all Super Bowl winners on this list. The teams on this are all great. That Rams were good for that season, but below average when compared to all the Super Bowl winners in the history of the NFL.

    • @giannisakoumpo
      @giannisakoumpo 7 місяців тому +5

      @@anthropomorphicOrangewhat? That team was basically stacked as hell

  • @davidgilbert3821
    @davidgilbert3821 7 місяців тому +11

    1991 NFC championship game Lions vs Washington.

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому +2

      One of the most one sided games you’ll find that late into the playoffs.

    • @raymondsmith2040
      @raymondsmith2040 7 місяців тому +9

      1991 NFC championship game Lions vs *Redskins. Fixed it.

    • @mytee32
      @mytee32 7 місяців тому +1

      Crazy that Washington beat that same Lions team in week 1 45-0

    • @tomservo75
      @tomservo75 7 місяців тому

      @@raymondsmith2040 💯

  • @Rhymethyme33
    @Rhymethyme33 7 місяців тому +10

    I know that the 72 Dolphins went undefeated, but the 84 Niners and 85 Bears should be 1 and 2, and it's a toss up for who should be #1

    • @JosexNieves
      @JosexNieves 7 місяців тому +1

      Yeah bears are definitely that number 1 fosho

    • @j.a.191
      @j.a.191 7 місяців тому +2

      @@JosexNieves The '72 Dolphins had the most points and gave up the fewest points. They also had the most yards and gave up the fewest yards. They also won every game. What measure of greatness can there be that eclipses that?

    • @JosexNieves
      @JosexNieves 7 місяців тому

      @@j.a.191 the who? No one remembers those bums

    • @FoxxyBrown1111
      @FoxxyBrown1111 7 місяців тому

      Just because you are 9 yo, watch football since maybe two years doesnt mean real people do not remember the 1991 Redskins. The 2nd best team in the SB era, behind the Bears only. @@JosexNieves

    • @JosexNieves
      @JosexNieves 7 місяців тому

      @@FoxxyBrown1111 who

  • @youknowihaduwuittoem
    @youknowihaduwuittoem 2 місяці тому +2

    Not saying Redskins in your own script is one thing, but censoring it in a historical clip of their own announcer is something else. Stop trying to erase the past.

  • @charlesbeshortt564
    @charlesbeshortt564 7 місяців тому +4

    2000 ravens at 34 is disrespectful

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому

      Given their offense I think it’s not too unfair.
      Part of why their defense is considered so amazing was because of what the offense gave them.

  • @nwilson5689
    @nwilson5689 7 місяців тому +24

    Love videos like these! 2013 Seahawks are one of the best I’ve ever seen.

    • @kevinuchiha6830
      @kevinuchiha6830 7 місяців тому +3

      They were good. However, the 2015 Panthers were tough. Too bad Newton was too scared of the Ball

    • @riquetc0060
      @riquetc0060 7 місяців тому +11

      ​@@kevinuchiha6830Why would you bring up a team that didn't even win the super bowl?

    • @kevinuchiha6830
      @kevinuchiha6830 7 місяців тому +5

      @@riquetc0060 good question. I'm not sure myself

    • @robertsprouse9282
      @robertsprouse9282 7 місяців тому

      @@kevinuchiha6830, not the ball.. twas those who could’ve mashed his..

  • @ethanjones2901
    @ethanjones2901 7 місяців тому +9

    As a Giants fan I have to agree with our 2011 team being the worst Super Bowl champions, our defense was terrible (although they did admittedly play much better in the postseason) and we had the worst rushing attack in the NFL. Eli and our receivers did a good deal of the heavy lifting that season and the team got hot at the right time, although we were certainly lucky we avoided having to go to the Super Dome and play the Saints (a team who’d demolished us in the regular season) in the NFCCG.
    The 2007 team being ranked second to last is a bit more contentious though. Yes, they were only 10-6, Eli’s quarterbacking was pretty hot and cold until the playoffs, and we frankly got a number of lucky bounces, but the team was also just very well-rounded. We had a great offensive line plus both a 1,000 yard receiver and running back, with a top five rushing attack to boot. The defense was ranked middle of the pack in terms of points per game and per drive, but we also had a terrific front seven which led the league in sacks including two double digit sackers (Tuck and Osi) plus the veteran Strahan. Plus, maybe some homerism but I just feel knocking off the only undefeated team in the 16 game era is a pretty big added boost.
    I personally would’ve put them over the 2012 Ravens, 1980 Raiders, 1970 Colts, 2015 Broncos, and 2001 Patriots, but again likely some homerism there.

    • @jackinwestchester4455
      @jackinwestchester4455 7 місяців тому

      A real "Giants fan" would never call the 2011 defense "terrible"

    • @ethanjones2901
      @ethanjones2901 7 місяців тому

      @@jackinwestchester4455 We were 25th in points allowed, 27th in yards allowed, 21st in defensive DVOA, *29th* in passing yards allowed (20th in NY/A), 19th in rushing yards allowed (23rd in Y/A), 25th in points per drive and 22nd in yards per drive.
      Yes they did have a great front seven and the defense as a whole played much better in the playoffs, but there’s not sugarcoating it: the Giants defense during the regular season *was fucking terrible.*

    • @ethanjones2901
      @ethanjones2901 7 місяців тому

      @@jackinwestchester4455 I would appreciate it if you didn’t question my loyalty lmao I’m a diehard fan of the G-Men, I’ll willingly admit that defense was hot garbage until the postseason

    • @DaDitka
      @DaDitka 7 місяців тому

      A fair assessment, based on my memory. I never got the feeling that the 2011 were a great team per se. But as someone else wrote, better to be the worst of the winners than the best of the losers.

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому

      The guy who doesn’t get mentioned enough in 2011 is Victor Cruz.
      There are very few players who have gotten 1,500 yards and a ring in the same season.

  • @XBC3-4GOTY
    @XBC3-4GOTY 7 місяців тому +11

    The 2010 Packers will always be a “Special Legendary Team” for Me

  • @charlesdunn442
    @charlesdunn442 7 місяців тому +5

    I was ready to be upset if the 91 Redskins didn’t make the top 10 but number 6 is cool with me. It’s the other NFC East teams that should have a beef. The 86 Giants are way too low and the 92 or 77 Cowboys could be moved up a few spots also.

    • @warc8us
      @warc8us 7 місяців тому +4

      the fact that none of the three super bowl winning 90s Cowboys teams made it into the Top 10 is crazy IMO. Back to back wins against two of the best teams never to win the Super Bowl in the Bills, plus having to contend with really good divisional opponents + having to beat extremely good Steve Young or Brett Favre led 49ers/Green Bay teams in the playoffs each season. Those were dominant teams

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому +2

      @@warc8usI think 93 was the best of those personally.

  • @nickm15
    @nickm15 7 місяців тому +18

    The Eli Manning Giants being the bottom 2 is just straight disrespectful

    • @BrickCity_101
      @BrickCity_101 7 місяців тому

      really Big Joy Kill

    • @geneseofootball1915
      @geneseofootball1915 6 місяців тому

      Considering the state of that franchise today, just be happy to have those championships!

  • @DylanMichno
    @DylanMichno 7 місяців тому +44

    The last place is probably 2019 patriots that game was garbage.

    • @kevinuchiha6830
      @kevinuchiha6830 7 місяців тому +5

      saints vs pats 2019 is the real sb fr

    • @T1_Productions
      @T1_Productions 7 місяців тому +1

      Same thing can be said about the Broncos and Seahawks Super Bowl

    • @ChiefBlue4298
      @ChiefBlue4298 7 місяців тому +5

      @@kevinuchiha6830Saints vs Chiefs*

    • @kevinuchiha6830
      @kevinuchiha6830 7 місяців тому +2

      @@ChiefBlue4298 lol

    • @riquetc0060
      @riquetc0060 7 місяців тому +9

      The quality of the game has nothing to do with how good the team was lmao

  • @sports3117
    @sports3117 7 місяців тому +27

    This past year was Kansas City’s toughest Super Bowl march after all the dropped passes and lack of discipline to close out the season, all thanks to Spags and the defense

    • @ChiefBlue4298
      @ChiefBlue4298 7 місяців тому +7

      One of the greatest defensive performances in playoff history

    • @ariici
      @ariici 7 місяців тому +6

      @@ChiefBlue4298 yea the 2013 seahawks were

    • @aquila519
      @aquila519 7 місяців тому +6

      Defense lowkey carried the Chiefs this season and post season. Very different to the other years where it was the Chiefs high powered offense that got them to stomp opponents but it was definitely different this year. Defense did one hell of a job this season but it's not being talked about enough

    • @ariici
      @ariici 7 місяців тому +3

      @@aquila519very true but that Sb was defense first half, offense second half both in OT

    • @ckendall67
      @ckendall67 7 місяців тому +3

      As a Giants fan, it all looked so familiar to me too; the Chiefs grinded through a tough regular season, were doubted & counted out, they eventually righted the ship in the playoffs, an outstanding defensive unit, were road 'underdogs' in the playoffs, got back to the Super Bowl against a familiar opponent, and won on their last drive of the game with a touchdown....and their MVP QB leading his team to another Lombardi Trophy. 🙂
      Sometimes, the best & most memorable Super Bowl-winning seasons are from the teams that had to grind their way through all season to get to the mountain top( or even get BACK there as well ). And the 2023 Chiefs just completed one of their very own. 🙂

  • @Aloharayray808
    @Aloharayray808 7 місяців тому +3

    53rd spot for the 2015 Broncos is criminal 😢
    Should’ve been at least in the top 40 or so
    We shall see where our other super bowls will be placed

  • @ClamsCasino1997
    @ClamsCasino1997 6 місяців тому +1

    Glad you guys put the the 1991 redskins in the top 10. They’re largely unrecognized as one of the greatest teams ever

  • @kevinburke6055
    @kevinburke6055 7 місяців тому +12

    And People say Eli is not a Hall of Famer. He literally took the 2 worst teams to a SB win.

    • @jaceking5938
      @jaceking5938 7 місяців тому +4

      If only every other borderline HOFer got to pick their 8 best games to rest their legacy on..

    • @FoxxyBrown1111
      @FoxxyBrown1111 7 місяців тому +1

      Because he isnt. Most ints among his fellow QBs when he was active, average efficiency stats, close playoff games in both lucky SB runs, just two good seasons, never scoring more than 21 points in a SB. Almost missing the playoffs in both SB years. The facts are there: Eli is no HoFer. Not even close. There are about 120 QBs more justifiable for the HoF than him.

    • @kevinburke6055
      @kevinburke6055 6 місяців тому

      @@FoxxyBrown1111 he’s getting in just take the L

  • @Bill_Woo
    @Bill_Woo 7 місяців тому +2

    Everybody thank NFL Throwback for putting that box in the upper left corner and keeping it up there, because some people like to do things excellently!

  • @alexH72471
    @alexH72471 7 місяців тому +5

    2015 Broncos are way too low. A top-5 all-time defense, two 1,000-yard receivers and Hall of Fame QB. They crushed every offense they faced that year.

    • @LiamDeege
      @LiamDeege 7 місяців тому +3

      Because their defense carried them mostly compared to the offense.

    • @ethanjones2901
      @ethanjones2901 7 місяців тому +3

      Nah I would agree with their ranking, the 2015 Broncos had an all time great defense but tbh they also did an insane amount of heavy lifting carrying an anemic offense quarterbacked by the corpse of Peyton. They did have two 1,000 yard receivers but outside of Sanders and Thomas their passing attack was generally pretty weak with Manning putting up terrible stats. Brock filled in admirably in his absence but he certainly didn’t put up any gaudy numbers. They also got a huge break by not having to play the Steelers with a healthy AB and banged up Ben.

    • @MichaelMurphy-kj3xf
      @MichaelMurphy-kj3xf 7 місяців тому +3

      2015 Broncos barely beat weaker Steelers and Patriot teams in the playoffs - at Mike High. Their rating here is accurate

    • @alexH72471
      @alexH72471 7 місяців тому +2

      @@MichaelMurphy-kj3xf The Patriots were actually favored in 2015. And you can say that about a lot of teams. 2016 Pats faced Osweiler Texans and Bell-less Steelers. 2020 Bucs got 7-win Washington, totally done Brees, Packers' backup o-line and Chiefs' third-string OTs.

    • @MichaelMurphy-kj3xf
      @MichaelMurphy-kj3xf 7 місяців тому

      ​@@alexH72471Not sure what your point is.
      The 2015 Patriots were not one of the stronger New England teams

  • @williamweiss6128
    @williamweiss6128 7 місяців тому +3

    Remember seeing a lot of these older games when I was a young fan.

  • @ryaneugenelawrencewalls1987
    @ryaneugenelawrencewalls1987 7 місяців тому +5

    Eli Manning to this day still owns the Patriots 2007 and 2011 1:10

  • @baltimoresportsnostalgia
    @baltimoresportsnostalgia 7 місяців тому +22

    Putting the 2012-2013 ravens at 56 is crazy. Flacco took down Luck, Manning, and Brady. That is actually a dumb take.

    • @frankgonzalez7432
      @frankgonzalez7432 7 місяців тому +4

      They had some luck getting into the playoffs. They even had to convert a 4th and 20+ against the Bolts to go to OT. Plus their defense suffered greatly after Ray Lewis went down with a near season ending injury…

    • @JoshuaGramm-ur9re
      @JoshuaGramm-ur9re 7 місяців тому +5

      The entire list is superbowl winners, they're all good teams.

    • @anthropomorphicOrange
      @anthropomorphicOrange 7 місяців тому +5

      @@JoshuaGramm-ur9re I totally agree. I don't think people are understanding the concept of this list. This list comparing great teams to other great teams. The worst team on this list is still a great team. That 2012-2013 Ravens was great, but not great compared to most of the other teams on this list.

    • @pp3k3jamail
      @pp3k3jamail 7 місяців тому

      They had a spectacular run in the playoffs that don't mean they were that good during the regular season. Most of these Super Bowl teams on this list was smash the 2012 Ravens.

  • @AmazingGuy13
    @AmazingGuy13 7 місяців тому +4

    86 Giants at 21 proves the person running this is a Giants hater.

  • @hateusernames2
    @hateusernames2 7 місяців тому +1

    all the Super Bowl Champions from the least remembered to the most memorable.. enjoying watching this. Also underdog champions to the dominant

  • @zachdamenti4387
    @zachdamenti4387 7 місяців тому +5

    Super Bowl LVIII is now the greatest national televised broadcast since the moon landing from over a half century ago!

  • @Nick-dg2rx
    @Nick-dg2rx 7 місяців тому +2

    Coming from a bears fan, for them to be the 2nd best Super Bowl on this list is well deserved.

    • @DaDitka
      @DaDitka 7 місяців тому

      Agreed. Those who bash this team because they "only" beat the Rams and the Patriots need to remember that bad teams don't make it deep into the playoffs. The Patriots and the Rams had quality teams (they ALWAYS do well in my Strat replays), and the Giants that year were no pushover, with the second best defense that year.
      And the Patriots beat the Dolphins on the road against a HoF quarterback.
      I'll take it!

    • @Nick-dg2rx
      @Nick-dg2rx 7 місяців тому +1

      @@DaDitka those who bash the team, never knew the glory of Walter Payton or the 85 bears defense. That defense today would destroy the other teams.

    • @DaDitka
      @DaDitka 7 місяців тому

      @Nick-dg2rx Absolutely. And saying this doesn't take away from the greatness of other teams like the 1986 Giants or the 1989 49ers. People news to calm down, I think (that goes for me too! Lol)

    • @Briguy75
      @Briguy75 2 місяці тому

      Bro, #1 in scoring defense, #2 in scoring offense. I think they should be # 1

  • @johnbrandt7850
    @johnbrandt7850 7 місяців тому +5

    You can't just go by regular season record which seems to be the biggest factor in these ratings.

    • @j.a.greene3523
      @j.a.greene3523 7 місяців тому +4

      You have to, or else it just goes on playoff performance, which makes it even harder to gauge.

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому

      It’s worth factoring in, but it shouldn’t be the only thing you look at.

    • @j.a.greene3523
      @j.a.greene3523 7 місяців тому

      @@fortynights1513
      Right, which is why you also look at playoff performance as well.

  • @natester2617
    @natester2617 7 місяців тому +31

    91 Skins would smoke 76 Raiders, other than that, good list

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому +3

      I’d argue both should be top ten probably.

    • @anthropomorphicOrange
      @anthropomorphicOrange 7 місяців тому +3

      Most of the people who are criticizing this guy's list are way off base. They're just picking teams that they liked when they were young. However, you I agree with. The Redskins ( they'll always be the Redskins to me. The Redskins or the Hogs. We didn't they change their name to the Hogs. The Hogs is a much better name than Commanders) that year was a dominant team, even among a long list of Super Bowl winners.

    • @pp3k3jamail
      @pp3k3jamail 7 місяців тому +2

      That's what I was saying I can't stand the Washington whatever their team want to be called, but I was like man the 1991 Redskins were blow out the 76 Raiders by like four touchdowns.
      Heck the 83 Raiders would smashed the 76 Raiders. The 83 Raiders is considered the best Raiders Super Bowl team out of the three.

    • @robertsprouse9282
      @robertsprouse9282 7 місяців тому +2

      ‘76 RAIDERS had a plus-111 point differential?
      That was one helck of a lucky 13-1-0 run, 16-1 after winning in the postseason by an average of two TDs per game..

    • @jaxonwoods8181
      @jaxonwoods8181 7 місяців тому +6

      The 1991 Redskins are one of the best teams ever assembled, not doubt. However, this is a foolish take. The 1976 Raiders lost only one game (NE) all year, avenged that loss in the playoffs, beat the crap out of the two-time defending champs in the AFCCG (PIT), and beat the crap out of the Vikings in the SB. At the very least, it'd be a close, tense, fun matchup between two all-time great teams.

  • @jakepena5730
    @jakepena5730 7 місяців тому +7

    crazy how that 2007 patriot team is more than likely number 1 if they win that Super Bowl but the Giants are in the 50s lol

    • @mramisuzuki6962
      @mramisuzuki6962 7 місяців тому

      The giants were a mediocre team that got hot, they’re not a 14-2 and completed the season with a SB. Understand the topic.

    • @jakepena5730
      @jakepena5730 7 місяців тому

      @@mramisuzuki6962 understand what im saying

  • @gorjaun
    @gorjaun 7 місяців тому +8

    these videos are the highlight of my week, always so enjoyable

  • @louz657
    @louz657 7 місяців тому +3

    VIDEO IDEA: RANKING EVERY SUPER BOWL LOSER/RUNNER UP

  • @trueempire8948
    @trueempire8948 7 місяців тому +1

    Giants fan Super Bowl 42 and 46 will always be my all time favorite Super Bowls. Both games was epic especially SB 42 when we defeated the goat Tom Brady and the then 18-0 Patriots was truly a special moment ill never forget.

  • @keanuuchiha1306
    @keanuuchiha1306 7 місяців тому +58

    Just disrespected tf outta the Giants

    • @j.a.greene3523
      @j.a.greene3523 7 місяців тому +15

      2011 is arguably the worst team to win a SB. The 2007 team is criminally underrated.

    • @leogiancola8925
      @leogiancola8925 7 місяців тому +4

      @@j.a.greene35232011 Is def the worst. 2007 is probably like 45th or something

    • @Phinal_Flash
      @Phinal_Flash 7 місяців тому +4

      They're the only 9 win team to win a Super Bowl. What did you expect?

    • @Phinal_Flash
      @Phinal_Flash 7 місяців тому +2

      ​​@@leogiancola8925I agree that the 2007 Giants are a little too low.

    • @j.a.greene3523
      @j.a.greene3523 7 місяців тому +2

      @@leogiancola8925
      2007 Giants got better as the season went on. People forget they gave up 70 points in their first two games…

  • @HVLLOWS1999
    @HVLLOWS1999 2 дні тому +1

    T10:
    10) 49ers 89/90
    09) Packers 66/67
    08) Steelers 75/76
    07) 49ers 94/95
    06) Redskins 91/92 Commanders*
    05) Raiders 76/77
    04) Steelers 78/79
    03) 49ers 84/85
    02) Bears 85/86
    01) Dolphins 72/73

    • @HVLLOWS1999
      @HVLLOWS1999 2 дні тому

      Wow three 49er & two Steeler apperences in the top 10. I love my Steelers! Plus no Cowboys, Patriots or Ravens in the top 10 a perfect list in my opinion!
      😭💀😏

  • @LiamDeege
    @LiamDeege 7 місяців тому +6

    I did not expect to see the 1972 Dolphins at number 1, I was expecting a Patriots team of some kind. This is coming from a Pittsburgh fan who hates New England greatly.

    • @kevinuchiha6830
      @kevinuchiha6830 7 місяців тому +5

      Can't even argue that

    • @LiamDeege
      @LiamDeege 7 місяців тому +3

      We meet again, but yeah, I agree.

    • @brandocalrissian3294
      @brandocalrissian3294 7 місяців тому +2

      How can you argue against a perfect team that scored the most and let up the least amount of points?

    • @kevinuchiha6830
      @kevinuchiha6830 7 місяців тому +2

      @@LiamDeege lol we'll always see each other

    • @LiamDeege
      @LiamDeege 7 місяців тому +1

      @@kevinuchiha6830 We certainly always will on stuff relating to the NFL I suppose.

  • @DylanMichno
    @DylanMichno 7 місяців тому +16

    Imagine being the Broncos against the 49ers in the blowout

    • @kevinuchiha6830
      @kevinuchiha6830 7 місяців тому +5

      ew broncos

    • @1990Thunderbolt
      @1990Thunderbolt 7 місяців тому +2

      @@kevinuchiha6830 the broncos did what the chiefs couldn't do = beat the packers in the super bowl!
      the chiefs did what the broncos couldn't do = beat the 49ers in the super bowl not once but twice!

  • @diegopons4622
    @diegopons4622 7 місяців тому +5

    I don't know how the hell the '89 49ers are barely tenth on this list. +100 point differential in three playoff games. That may be the craziest team stat I've ever heard of.

  • @T1MB05L1C3
    @T1MB05L1C3 7 місяців тому +1

    The Eagles winning with a backup QB was absolutely nuts

  • @JesseGMan7
    @JesseGMan7 4 місяці тому +1

    I love how if that Patriots team would’ve won that SB game in 08 they would be #1, but since the Giants won they’re last lmao.

  • @andrewthepenn
    @andrewthepenn 7 місяців тому +3

    As a Jet fan, I'll take #24

  • @gabebriggs6031
    @gabebriggs6031 7 місяців тому +3

    Wow that's disrespect ol giants who beat a 17 0 team and a 15 n 1 team unreal

    • @j.a.greene3523
      @j.a.greene3523 7 місяців тому +3

      Regular season, they were lucky enough to make the playoffs.

  • @XBC3-4GOTY
    @XBC3-4GOTY 7 місяців тому +3

    1996 Packers Should Be in the Top Five and Over the 1966 Packers

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому

      1966 Packers aren’t even the best season that Packers team played in my book (it won’t be on the list, but the 1962 team exists).

    • @XBC3-4GOTY
      @XBC3-4GOTY 7 місяців тому

      @@fortynights1513 this is best SuperBowl Winners and the 1962 Packers didn’t play in the SuperBowl Era

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому

      @@XBC3-4GOTYOf course, just saying 62 is better than 66 in my opinion

    • @broney24
      @broney24 7 місяців тому +1

      Agreed. The ESPN DVOA list had the 1996 Packers at #4

  • @termight2607
    @termight2607 7 місяців тому +8

    2020 buccaneers sooooooo underrated they had one of the most loaded teams we've ever seen and no off-season beat the mess out of mahomes with tyreek does no one remember...
    2019 Chiefs who they beat are ranked 20 spots ahead!!! Who made this list

    • @dudewtf1221
      @dudewtf1221 7 місяців тому +1

      i think it might be because the chiefs had 5 backups for their oline

    • @EricStuder89
      @EricStuder89 7 місяців тому +1

      Andy Reid vs Brady in the postseason: 0-4
      Mahomes vs Brady in the postseason: 0-2

  • @doomcos
    @doomcos 7 місяців тому +2

    2015 Broncos one of the greatest defenses ever and theyre 53? Come on

    • @LiamDeege
      @LiamDeege 7 місяців тому +1

      Because their offense wasn’t great.

    • @ethanjones2901
      @ethanjones2901 7 місяців тому +2

      There’s more than one side of the ball, the 2015 Broncos had a historically great defense but their offense was pretty anemic for most of the year, and at certain points just downright terrible. Peyton’s physical decline became a huge liability for the team and their offensive line was pretty middling too. They did have two 1,000 yard receivers but outside of them the pass catchers were pretty mediocre.

    • @lzv6990
      @lzv6990 7 місяців тому

      I’m a Broncos fan. The 2015 Broncos have the worst combination of QB/RB/OL of any Super Bowl winner ever.

  • @bonthecuber
    @bonthecuber 7 місяців тому +3

    Love seeing good rankings :)

  • @hiimemily
    @hiimemily 7 місяців тому +1

    How does it feel, New England? You lost to the two worst Super Bowl winners of all time.

  • @robwasilewski9273
    @robwasilewski9273 7 місяців тому +5

    01 Patriots should be in the top 10. With the offense they had and win the game. Defense definitely was the major part of team.

    • @j.a.greene3523
      @j.a.greene3523 7 місяців тому +2

      They weren’t impressive offensively.

  • @daniellacey6001
    @daniellacey6001 7 місяців тому +2

    OK so the real #1 is the 85' Bears because everyone knows the 72' Dolphins are the most overrated Super Bowl winning team in history and are not the greatest team ever. Not only did they play less games back then, but they also played the worst of the worst teams to get that undefeated regular season. 85' Bears should be number 1 easily. Whoever put this list together needs to lose their job.

  • @Father_Prime
    @Father_Prime 7 місяців тому +6

    2007 Giants beat the #1 seed Cowboys in Dallas, #2 seed Packers in -20 degree weather, then the **undefeated** 2007 Patriots in the Super Bowl. Steve Spagnuolo’s defense led the league with 53 sacks. Every other team in the 50-58 range would get absolutely smacked by them.

  • @chalkywhitelll8448
    @chalkywhitelll8448 7 місяців тому +8

    Giving Eli Manning the two worst winners ever is total disrespect by salty Pat fans

  • @MamesJatthew29
    @MamesJatthew29 7 місяців тому +1

    As a cowboys from the late 80’s on, the 91 Redskins and the 92 Cowboys should’ve been ranked a LOT higher. That Skins offense threw down some serious points and NOBODY wanted to play them at RFK. The 92 Cowboys are still the team with THE greatest depth of players, especially on D, in history, as well as the greatest offensive line ever. Oh, and Eli Manning, love him or hate him, and I hate the fucking Giants- was CLUTCH. Yea, he barely helped smuggle the giants into the 2007 postseason at 9-7, but he WON when it truly mattered and thanks to him (and Tyree)- prevented everyone from having to hear about “the perfect season” from every Pats fan. Lol.

  • @nellgwenn
    @nellgwenn 7 місяців тому +1

    I'd like to see a show about the un-modern, or should we say the ancient era of fooball.
    What made games or players great before the Super Bowl was a thing.

  • @mariosnum1fan
    @mariosnum1fan 7 місяців тому +1

    Thanks for the video! I’d argue giants should be higher. To take down elite teams during that time in those postseasons is not easy

  • @michael7054
    @michael7054 7 місяців тому +4

    Great video! I like how the first Chiefs Super Bowl is ranked higher than all the Patrick Mahomes ones 😂😂😂

    • @robertsprouse9282
      @robertsprouse9282 7 місяців тому +2

      In 1969-70= CHIEFS had EIGHT HALL GUYS!
      How many people heading there are on 2023-24 KC?

    • @michael7054
      @michael7054 7 місяців тому +2

      @robertsprouse9282 yeah all true

    • @patrickstovall2262
      @patrickstovall2262 7 місяців тому

      ​@@robertsprouse9282I know of at least 3-4 including mahomes and kelce, so shut it

    • @robertsprouse9282
      @robertsprouse9282 7 місяців тому

      @@patrickstovall2262 , anymore, besides Butker and Jones.. or Humphrey.. Thuney(??), RIGHT NOW, genius?
      Your Move.. Einstein.

  • @jorgesoto7640
    @jorgesoto7640 3 місяці тому

    35 for the 83 raiders is crazy , 2000 ravens???? At 34 WTF thats a top 10 team for sure

  • @superbowltournament1692
    @superbowltournament1692 7 місяців тому +3

    Just curious about rating these teams. The NFL 100 was done in 2019, so it was Super Bowl champions from 1966-2018 (New England's last Super Bowl title,) along with other teams in history, dating back to the 1920's. While you can insert KC, Tampa Bay, and LA Rams, how is it, whenever these ratings are done, teams flop around? Example: NFL 100, #3 team is 1978 Steelers. But on this list, they are #4. The 1984 49ers were #4, yet they are #3 on this list. The lowest rated Super Bowl champion was the 2012 Ravens in the NFL 100, but now it's the 2011 Giants. Any explanation @NFL Throwback ?

    • @j.a.greene3523
      @j.a.greene3523 7 місяців тому +1

      Opinions change.

    • @jaxonwoods8181
      @jaxonwoods8181 7 місяців тому

      Some changes are marginal and arguable. The gap between the 1978 Steelers and 1984 49ers is slim, so switching them around is no big deal. However, they completely got it right putting the 2012 Ravens ahead of the 2011 Giants. The Ravens were much better in the regular season, and both teams had nearly perfect SB runs.

  • @-PURPLE-HEAD
    @-PURPLE-HEAD 7 місяців тому +1

    Whoever made this list couldn’t have seen many of these teams first hand.

  • @notsuspiciousthejudgmental2423
    @notsuspiciousthejudgmental2423 7 місяців тому +3

    For everyone confused by the rankings, I'm pretty sure they're going by point differential as their stat for comparison
    Or maybe not, this list doesn't make a whole lot of sense in its construction

  • @joelskillz4875
    @joelskillz4875 7 місяців тому +2

    How could you rank the Giants as #58 and #57 when we beat the 18-0 Patriots??

  • @justintime2031
    @justintime2031 7 місяців тому +3

    The list is backwards and upside down.thanks

    • @griffinconaway732
      @griffinconaway732 7 місяців тому

      Its your bedtime, child

    • @justintime2031
      @justintime2031 7 місяців тому

      @@griffinconaway732 I'm older than you and have watched more football than you've ever seen son.been around since superbowl 7 boy.these are wrong af

  • @jasonthompson8147
    @jasonthompson8147 7 місяців тому +1

    The giants that beat the bills in the Super Bowl was the worst team to win a Super Bowl. Would say the Super Bowl 3 jets are up there also.

    • @johnphelan4215
      @johnphelan4215 2 місяці тому

      Except that those 1990 Giants beat one of the greatest teams ever the week before in the threepeat-seeking Niners, followed by a totally revolutionary offense that no one had seen before and no one else had stopped. It's best TEAM, not best collection of players. In terms of elite talent, the Giants had maybe the best set of linebackers ever (or at least since Lambert/Ham/Russell), Bavaro was a beast at TE and Ottis Anderson is severely underrated due to playing for bad teams in St Louis most of his career. Still, compared to Montana/Rice/Lott etc. and Kelly/Thomas/Reed/Smith, etc. it isn't really close in terms of talent. A couple of guys named Parcells and Belichick evened things up though.

  • @lzv6990
    @lzv6990 7 місяців тому +3

    The 1992 Cowboys are much better than the 1999 Rams. The Cowboys were a much more physical team, particularly with their O Line. Their defensive line was so deep he backups could have started for 20 of the other teams. They played much better competition in the playoffs than the Rams and dominated them. (actually they won every postseason game by double digits in 92/93/95). The 92 Cowboys is one of of the youngest Super Bowl teams ever.

  • @410phee4
    @410phee4 2 місяці тому +1

    2012 Ravens??? Beat prime Brady and #1 offense Manning?? Ray Lewis Ed Reed? Trippin trippin

  • @BigJay-02
    @BigJay-02 7 місяців тому +8

    21 rams at 52 is crazy

    • @giannisakoumpo
      @giannisakoumpo 7 місяців тому +4

      Fr that team had it all, so many good players on both sides

    • @LiamDeege
      @LiamDeege 7 місяців тому +6

      That should be at least top 15. That Super Bowl was great throughout.

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому +1

      In the middle I’d say.

    • @PassRoyalr
      @PassRoyalr 7 місяців тому

      @@LiamDeege They are not even close to top 15 lmao. They should have lost to the bucs or 49ers in the playoffs and didn't win a single game in december

    • @LiamDeege
      @LiamDeege 7 місяців тому

      @@PassRoyalr Bucs just didn't play as good of a game as the Rams and the 49ers let that NFC Championship slip away. It was also a great story because Matthew Stafford finally won a Super Bowl at that point, he really deserved it in my opinion. Super Bowl 56 was one of the best Super Bowls as of recently in my opinion which is why I argue this.

  • @Minivanmusician
    @Minivanmusician 7 місяців тому

    The backup QB's and statistical balance on both sides of the ball really show that it's more culture and coaching than anything.

  • @Anon-zl4ne
    @Anon-zl4ne 7 місяців тому +6

    None of these teams would beat the 1989 49ers. They belong at #1.

    • @JosexNieves
      @JosexNieves 7 місяців тому +2

      The 86 bears would kill them

  • @2003jsciarrino
    @2003jsciarrino 7 місяців тому +1

    I love how they can't say Redskins surprised they didn't black out the logo too

  • @fintheguy
    @fintheguy 7 місяців тому +3

    Let's not kid ourselves: If the worst team in the NFL today played the 1972 Dolphins they would put up 100 on them.

    • @lzv6990
      @lzv6990 7 місяців тому +1

      Then the best team of all-time is the last championship team when civilization ends. What’s the point of making rankings then if it’s always the modern team?

    • @nellgwenn
      @nellgwenn 7 місяців тому +1

      It depends on the rules you employ.
      If you take the best teams of today and get them in your DeLorean to go back in time, todays teams would get smashed to smithereens by yesterday's defenses.

    • @fintheguy
      @fintheguy 7 місяців тому

      @@nellgwenn Not at all - in the slightest. Lineman back then were 240-260 at best and today are 300+ easily.
      Your average wide receiver today would look like an olympic track star out there.
      If you transported Mean Joe Greene to today's sports science he would probably be like 310lbs. and a completely different human. Same if Aaron Donald was born in the 1960s.
      You can appreciate the past teams but the fact the 1972 Dolphins are considered the best of all time is just silly. Not even close.

    • @nellgwenn
      @nellgwenn 7 місяців тому +1

      @@fintheguy Jack Lambert was skinny and short And fearsome. Lawrence Taylor broke Theismann's leg, Jack Tatum paralyzed Daryl Stingley, Mel Blunt was responsible for a rule change. None of these guys were fat. And there's many more.

    • @fintheguy
      @fintheguy 7 місяців тому

      @@nellgwenn They all are slower, smaller and weaker than the modern day. C'mon the 2-15 Panthers would run up the score on them 70-0.
      I know my old school football. I have nothing but respect for them in THEIR ERA but we need to stop acting like it's the same level anymore.
      This is why Jim Brown is so amazing. He would be the best RB in the NFL today, and he was in the 1950s.

  • @rileyjackfansmithandjones8238
    @rileyjackfansmithandjones8238 5 місяців тому +1

    Loving Any Super Bowl where Tom Brady Lose

  • @luboss822
    @luboss822 7 місяців тому +7

    1972 Dolphins GOAT!

    • @kenjansson6932
      @kenjansson6932 7 місяців тому +5

      The 2007 Giants are happy to say, "You're welcome."

    • @ckendall67
      @ckendall67 7 місяців тому

      @@kenjansson6932 Yep! 😁

    • @ckendall67
      @ckendall67 7 місяців тому +1

      The '72 Dolphins will always be at the top of this list & rightfully so. Only way they can ever be topped is if a team goes 20-0( 17-0 regular season, win all 3 games in the playoffs & the Super Bowl ).

  • @arnoldgarzajr1164
    @arnoldgarzajr1164 7 місяців тому +1

    As a Cowboys fan that 1992 team that beat the Bills 52-17 is my favorite squad in the storied 58 super bowls.I can't wait for the 2024 NFL season to start later on this year in September.Hopefully no Chiefs in Super Bowl 59 and i think thats how it is going to go.That 1972 Miami Dolphins team that went 14-0 in the regular and 3-0 in the playoffs including that 14-7 win over the Redskins in Super Bowl 7 would be my pick too.An NFL team will have to go 17-0 in the regular season and beating e everybody in the playoffs and win the Super Bowl is extremely hard to do now a days.A very good list i enjoyed this video 🏈 👍

  • @tiddiesattic
    @tiddiesattic 7 місяців тому

    1992-1993 Cowboys are way too low.. that team was an absolute juggernaut

  • @ronaldschoolcraft8654
    @ronaldschoolcraft8654 7 місяців тому +4

    Santonio Holmes did not have his right toe down in the 2008 game. The Cardinals got robbed by the NFL.

    • @robertsprouse9282
      @robertsprouse9282 7 місяців тому

      I thought it was his left foot.. but.. you’re right, HE WAS NOT IN.
      Having said that, it was only a second down play..
      So, there was no guarantee that PITT would not get SIX, not with a running in his prime scrambling ROETHLISBERGER…at qb..
      nope..

  • @NigelIncubatorJones
    @NigelIncubatorJones 7 місяців тому +1

    Nice to see some love for the '72 Dolphins. But the '73 Dolphins were a lot more dominant in the playoffs, and should probably be much higher on your list. They scored on their first drive in all three games, and none of them were even close. Super Bowl 8 was effectively over after their second drive put them up 14-0.

    • @legrandfromage6450
      @legrandfromage6450 7 місяців тому +1

      Great team with the 2 1000-yard running backs. Totally dominant.

  • @Fireyninjadog
    @Fireyninjadog 7 місяців тому +4

    I'll put the 2023 chiefs at 56 out of 58. There, i said it. Hate on me. I do not care

    • @mikegonzalez503
      @mikegonzalez503 7 місяців тому +1

      I'm sure they will shed a tear on this take when they collect their rings.

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому

      In your opinion why 56th?
      And where would you put the 1988 49ers?

    • @Fireyninjadog
      @Fireyninjadog 7 місяців тому

      ​@fortynights1513 i think only the 2011 giants and 2007 giants were worse than the 2023 chiefs. KC's defense was improved, but even so, not a lot of takeaways. The offense struggled. Kelce had an off year by his godly standards, same with mahomes. The other wideouts were useless as hell, and they played in a terrible division. Other than miami, they had to squeak by in the postseason. Also, the 88 niners weren't that bad. Sure, 10-6 isn't dominant, but they played in a tough division, a beat out the rams and saints for the nfc west crown. They lost a lot of close games and only suffered 2 blowouts all year long, 2 coming in a meaningless week 16 game. They had great talent. I'd put them around 50. While it's the weakest niners team to win a super bowl, they're still not bad

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому

      @@FireyninjadogHow about the 1970 Colts?

    • @Fireyninjadog
      @Fireyninjadog 7 місяців тому

      Oh yeah, thanks for the reminder?bi guess the 2023 chiefs belong at 55. The 1970 colts are definitely 56, with how they played, and the teams they played​@fortynights1513

  • @UncleClaudeSportsandThangs
    @UncleClaudeSportsandThangs 7 місяців тому +2

    The 1975 Steelers should be at least 5th

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому +3

      They should be the best Steelers team here at the bare minimum

    • @johnphelan4215
      @johnphelan4215 2 місяці тому

      @@fortynights1513 Pretty tough to choose between the Bradshaw/Harris/Steel Curtain championship teams, other than maybe saying the '79 team that beat the Rams was the least scary.

  • @claudecrump5518
    @claudecrump5518 7 місяців тому +4

    Stop with nonsense and just say Redskins lol
    Don't mute it because a small group of people are fragile.
    90% of Native Americans were fine with the name.

    • @MichaelMurphy-kj3xf
      @MichaelMurphy-kj3xf 7 місяців тому

      It's a stupid name and if you can't see that then it speaks volumes about you

  • @lastsinnersa8002
    @lastsinnersa8002 7 місяців тому +4

    The fact the 1970 Baltimore Colts team isn't last is mystifying. Superbowl 5 was an utter mess of a game and the players feel it was a token ring, forever haunted by losing Superbowl 3 to the Jets. Ranking teams by their regular season...are you kidding? Geez, by that metric the 2007 Patriots would be #1, we know how much you want to. These lists usually rock it but this one is a farce.

    • @rpc717
      @rpc717 7 місяців тому +1

      It's a list of best teams, not best games. That's how you rate teams, based on their whole season.

    • @legrandfromage6450
      @legrandfromage6450 7 місяців тому

      That Colt team was good. Players and fans at that super bowl against Dallas later said that that was the hardest-hitting game they'd ever been in/seen. That was the reason for a lot of the turnovers.
      Both teams were regarded as "losers", so they played their guts out in that game.

  • @Cripkeeper0
    @Cripkeeper0 5 місяців тому

    Peytons big regression happened at the end of the year the year prior. Look at his per game stats in 2014, I wanna say it was around 4-5 games left when you all of a sudden saw this huge drop off from peyton in production and arm strength.

  • @jacksoneide9850
    @jacksoneide9850 7 місяців тому +5

    2010 Packers are way too low

  • @surferguy1974
    @surferguy1974 6 місяців тому

    The '22 Chiefs were the best team in franchise history. I'm a 49ers fan and even I can tell you that..

  • @jameslightsey1761
    @jameslightsey1761 7 місяців тому +5

    The 2017 Eagles should have been ranked higher especially since they never won a Superbowl for them to win it the way they did, was nothing short of amazing. And I guess ranking the 2023 Chiefs y'all really felt some way about them winning. Especially with them showing Taylor Swift lol

    • @Kuzzy95
      @Kuzzy95 7 місяців тому +2

      came here to say this, eagles should have been, at a minimum, in the top 50%, putting them at 28 is nonsense that team was special

    • @123shoshan
      @123shoshan 7 місяців тому

      Roster was garbage agholor and Jeffries their top 1 and 2 receivers and foles their qb

  • @VonAllenSports
    @VonAllenSports 6 місяців тому

    Okay, so Gil Brandt basically did this list. Got it.

  • @sethmaki1333
    @sethmaki1333 7 місяців тому

    That 69 Vikings squad that the Chiefs beat in January 1970 was one of the strongest teams ever. #1 offense and #1 defense. The Chiefs got lucky to run into that buzzsaw on their worst day.

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому

      If Tarkenton was on the 69 team they might’ve won, and been even more dominant.

  • @tyreepowell8367
    @tyreepowell8367 7 місяців тому +6

    Tom Brady Is My All Time Favorite Quarterback Who Won 7 Super Bowl Rings💍💍💍💍💍💍💍And 5 Super Bowl MVPS As The Greatest Player Of All Time🐐🏉🏈Love Him Or Hate Him

  • @briangreenberg6021
    @briangreenberg6021 7 місяців тому +2

    Those 2007 and 2011 Giant teams weren’t even good.

  • @marioaustin9312
    @marioaustin9312 7 місяців тому +3

    This list really proves defense 🏆 wins championships

    • @lzv6990
      @lzv6990 7 місяців тому

      Or it did at least.

  • @macdriverr6728
    @macdriverr6728 7 місяців тому +2

    Really don’t know how you have the 96 Packers out of the top 10.

    • @jaxonwoods8181
      @jaxonwoods8181 7 місяців тому +1

      Only take I pretty much agree with. #1 offense AND #1 defense. Deserves to be higher than #12.

    • @fortynights1513
      @fortynights1513 7 місяців тому

      @@jaxonwoods8181Let alone the only time that’s been done post salary cap.