The use of the adjective "inglorious" to describe death is quite baffling. As if death should normally entail glory and purpose, yet in this particular instance it lacks "glory" and is also "immediate", as if the poet is making a rather desperate attempt to express his frustration with lives being lost and how immediate and unnecessary it is. I'm keen to know whether you think this could be the case or is it a bit too far-fatched?
The use of the adjective "inglorious" to describe death is quite baffling. As if death should normally entail glory and purpose, yet in this particular instance it lacks "glory" and is also "immediate", as if the poet is making a rather desperate attempt to express his frustration with lives being lost and how immediate and unnecessary it is. I'm keen to know whether you think this could be the case or is it a bit too far-fatched?
I do not think it is far-fetched, I like your idea