Lomo 92 | Portrait test, push 2 stops, trying Lomo's newest film stock
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 лип 2024
- I tested the new Lomography film with the very same model who showcased on the packaging box!! Thank to Rafeal @2071photo again for having me join this fun shoot.
00:00 Intro, about this film
01:12 Portrait test shoot
06:24 Push 2 stops
08:39 Outro
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Film Photography Gear I use:
🖨️ Film Scanner: amzn.to/3Nbh84H
☀️ Light Meter: amzn.to/3Cc6zrS
⚡️ Flash Light Trigger: amzn.to/3C8pKmi
🧪 Home Film Processing Kit: ebay.us/fzJuc1
👁️🗨️ Black and White Film Developing Kit: amzn.to/42lQVof
📚 Photo Books I collect: amzn.to/43tvYIF
🎒 Everything in my Kit: kit.co/sam_zhang
Affiliate links: Some of the links above are affiliate links. If you choose to purchase after clicking a link, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you :) Thank you for your support!!
Follow me on Instagram: @itscapturedbysam
Another great video, And by tbe way your pictures are BRILLIANT Sam...love them !
Great Video!! Love the fisheye photos the most :)
Looks so different, right?! I love it~
I love the shots you got! I shot this pushed 1 stop and I loved the results. I agree when shooting this film I think you have to go a specific vibe for sure✨
I guess push one stop will make this more contrasty and more grainy, definitely a vibe!!
@@itscapturedbysam Yes it had a bit more contrast. I'm also gonna test just shooting at box speed. Liked this film more than I thought I would!
Great pictures like always but I really liked the fish eye lens pictures so much. The model was so good too! Great video.
She's great!! I'd love to work with here again in the future~
How cool is that? Way cool, that's how cool.
Excited to try this stuff, it's a fun flavor.
A film travel though time~ funnnnn
Definitely gonna be shooting it at least 200 moving forward but 100 ain’t bad at all 😎🤘🏽 what a fun video!
oh yeah, I'd at least overexpose it one stop if not two, the pastel undertone is very nice~
awesome video!!
Thank you ☺️
I'm glad it wasn't just me that struggled to get it loaded in the camera! It took my quite a few goes before I got it to properly engage with the take up spool on my AE-1P!
Calling in 2023, lol. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
Thank you for watching ☺️
Fun video. The results from that film are really interesting. Lomo definitely delivers when you want to try something unconventional. And as for accidentally over exposure I once shot a roll of Fuji Superia 400 at ISO 50 because I forgot to change the setting after a roll of Ilford Pan F. I was shocked that even with cheap drug store film I still got some salvageable images.
The latitude is insane with films, not just the latitude, sometimes when overexposed, the slight color shift can be really fun as well~
15:44 this shot is so good !
Thank you ☺️
I bought a 90s camera right as I got my Lomo92 delivery! Can't wait to shoot it, and seeing how every other LOMO film has a 100-400 rating I wouldn't worry about overexposing any film really, it has the latitude to take it and honestly think it looks great at 100.
Wow you are going all the way back to the 90s then!! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
5:52 - Milo!
Pulling to 100 isn’t the worst idea with some of these experimental films. Pure overexposure doesn’t seem to work as well with the lower dynamic range. The results were better than expected though. Just my two cents, the best of the new emulsions are Orwo NC 400 and 500.
I’ve heard this film actually look a lot like the NC400? I never tried it, but I’m interested~
Seems kinda accurate. Most of my photos taken in the 90s had this cooler cast to them.
They nailed the old photo look!!
I like the 2 stops overexposed roll even more. Nonetheless, the model of the first roll fits perfectly to the new Lomo film. 🎉
If I shoot this film more in the future, I'd overexpose it at lease one stop! The pastel tone look pretty nice~
I’m going to shoot a roll of this tomorrow! I just hope it’s not like Metropolis because I seriously do not care for that film stock.
I am the monster. I rather call people. Glad people getting awarded for their hard work.
Me sitting here, thinking it's going to be about how the model forgot to bring a tripod... Great vid Sam!
LoL, I'm in the process of getting a proper tripod, "SAM GOT A TRIPOD" video in coming~
HYPERS in the chat!!!@@itscapturedbysam
The color is appealing @ ISO 100. I can't explain why, though . .
at 100 it have more pastel tone, and the color over all look even more vintage I guess?
2 stops over looks better to me, and more vintage (if that’s a thing🤷🏻♂️). The shot at 18:02 is very nice, definitely my kind of thing.
looks like overexposure is the way to gooooo~
Being you use a fisheye lense do you think a full frame fisheye will still have the fisheye look om my aps-c 1.5 camera?
It will get crop in, so the fish eye effect will not be as obvious I guess~
Looks like you all had a lot of fun on the portrait roll! What is that ginormous Canon SLR that you are using???
that's the Canon 1V, it the first film camera I bought when I started this channel~
@@itscapturedbysam-- Awesome! I have an A2E, and I thought that that was large for an SLR!!!
Veey fun video!
I akways ger useful information from your video's. I really appreciate you ❤️
Have you shot Metropolis yet?
Thank you!! No I haven’t, maybe I’ll try it sometime~
@@itscapturedbysam I will order next week and keep you posted on what I experience with it.
I'm excited to see how it works in my Pentax 6x7 and Minolta X700; a little inspiration from you with the choice in Minolta 😊
Shooting this film with point a shoot camera of the90th will be difficult. Most of them adjust the speed by DX coding. You need DX stickers to say your camera hat it should expose. Who prefers a warmer look should take a Kodak Gold. Yout overexpose 2 stops. it would be intresting how Lompchrome color 92 reacts on 1 stop overexposed.
These new Lomography films are so interesting. I've used Metropolois and I have their purple one sitting in my fridge but I'd love to get my hands on the '92.
The purple one looks sooooo fun though~
Maybe it was an ISO 400 film... back in 1992.
LoL I like how I alway say “yeah I like 400 speed film~” then shoot it at 100 😂
Wait... so he shot this with an entirely different film stock, but they used the images and lowered the contrast to print it as a "showcase" how one of their new filmstocks would look like? Interesting.
Sorry I don’t quite understand what you mean~ do you mind elaborate?
@@itscapturedbysam Your friend shot these images of that model with a different film stock than Lomo 92. Then Lomography approached him or he approached them and Lomography chose to put his images on their Lomo 92 film stock box and altered these images (made them less contrasty and shifted the colors a bit) to make them look more like what Lomo 92 would look like, instead of handing the film stock out to a photographer who would shoot portraits with the actual Lomo 92 film stock.
So they advertise their film stock with images made with a different film stock. Which is kinda weird because it would be the same as to hand over images shot with Fuji C160 and send them to Kodak so they can advertise their Portra 400. Or Ford saying "Look at our new Ford Bronco" but the ad shows a Dodge Ram with a huge cardboard box on top with "Ford Bronco" written on it.
You get my point?
@@Project_2501 Now I understand what you mean. From my understanding, the film stock they shot a year ago was the 92 test stock, it's the same film before mess production. I don't know the exact detail, but I don't think they would advertise it with photos that was shot on different film.
It was lomo 92 test film that I shot, it didn’t have the name yet I was just told it was a 400 iso c41 film.
I’m pretty sure this film is expired… so shooting it at 100 probably gave you a more normal color tone vs at 40
😂 treat it as 20 year’s expired hint the name 92~ lol
😻 Promo-SM