LEICA Q2 Review by Ken Rockwell
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
- LEICA Q2 Review by Ken Rockwell
Full Review at www.kenrockwel...
Q2 Tutorial & Tips • LEICA Q2 Tutorial & Ti...
I got my Q2 at www.bhphotovid...
I'd also get it at www.adorama.co...
or at amzn.to/2U0yLbs
Suggested LEICA Strap: www.amazon.com...
Best 49mm UV Filter www.bhphotovid...
When you click on the links above to various merchants and make a purchase, this can result in me earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This video was lit by two made-in-Norway Luxli Cello lights and one Viola2 light, all set to 5,600K at 20% www.kenrockwel...
Moment Camera app at 5600K -0.4 stops
Stunningly spacious stereophonic sound recorded with two Senal SCM-660 microphones www.kenrockwel...
and Apogee Duet 2 Mic Preamp www.kenrockwel...
A35dB, AUDP -45 @ 2, MP 19r2
Ken Rockwell® is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.
Finally, a decent explanation of why I never sold any shots. Thank you.
Thanks!
I tried to get into photography several times but kept giving up when my results weren't what I was hoping for. I bought a Q2 so that the guilt from the price would force me to learn. I ended up loving this thing. I didn't realize that my problem was that the cameras I've purchased before were just a pain to use. It isn't fun using shifting through menus and sorting through all the BS. I'm nearly 2000 photos into the Q2 and I'm fully in. It's a joy to use and the results are unreal (now that I've learned what I'm doing ;) ).
Yes! That’s what I keep telling people: the less baloney between you and the picture, the better!
Q2 is the perfect beginners camera lol 😂
Man, I wanted the Q2, but I had about 3596 reasons for why I went with the X100v.
Thanks, Ken. Keep up the good work!
Obviously, for pictures, get the X100. To have a nice camera to show your friends, get the Leica.
Had both. The leica stayed due to better durability of the whole camera. It's not about showing your friends. With this camera noone ever asked me anything. You can stay perfectly undercover. This camera is understatement. That's what I like.
I own an iPhone 11 Pro Max and a Leica Q2. I can’t say I agree in any way with the comparison here. The iPhone’s colours are unreal and over saturated whereas the Leica’s colours are the best of any digital camera I’ve ever used. In my opinion, it has a similar rendition to that of medium format film like Portra 400. It also only blows highlights if you shoot in JPEG. DNG files have impressive abilities to recover the highlights.
I do like Canon colours a lot too, but there are some situations where Canons just don’t do well (neon lights for example). I have not found a single lighting situation where the Leica falls down.
But I suppose colours are just all down to taste.
Yes, this is art and color is 175% personal vision. We’re all trying to say different things with different colors. Thanks!
Hi Jamie, would you please let me know your JPEG settings (profile, saturation, etc.)? Cheers.
you must be new to Ken then...he is the master of saturated velvia like colors....
Rey Sotolongo he does max saturation on all his cameras.
As I said, I shot my LEICA Q2 in VIVID with HIGH saturation and HIGH sharpening and it’s still duller. Thanks!
Ferdinand Schnautzenhobel here, I'm writing to you from Wetzlar. We here at Leica are well aware that the colors suck. We would like to announce that we have addressed this issue and completely fixed it. Meet the Q2 monochrom. For a few hundred bucks more, you'll get a camera that will NEVER have you complaining about its color science. That's a Leica promise.
Superb! It was I who originally suggested the monochrom back around 2009 not for it’s color rendition, but for the obvious gain in light sensitivity and in resolution when one removes the Bayer filter. Now if we could just get you guys to make 0.91x finders again as in the mighty M3 www.kenrockwell.com/leica/m3.htm Thank you for all your work.
@@KenRockwellTV Hi Ken, Sorry, I have nothing to do with Leica, I was trying to be funny ...
Thanks Ken, this helped me pull the trigger on the X100V
Bingo! For the next few minutes (cyber Monday here in NYC) Adorama is having a one day sale on last years X100F for just $749 see www.adorama.com/IFJX100FS.html?kbid=21866
“Leicas aren’t so much about a great picture, they’re mostly about having a great lifestyle!”
Made me spit out my 20 dollar latte with that one!
He MUST be trolling
Not sure what "trolling" means, but I'm serious. LEICA today is a mens' fashion accessory, not really about taking pictures as much as looking cool to your friends.
Thanks, but sadly true.
@@KenRockwellTV And for just $5,000 - what a bargain!
@@rodsilva80 He's not trolling at all. jkb462 makes the point that the resulting image means nothing compared to having expensive photographic 'jewellery' to rest on the seat of your Bentley in Monte Carlo. If image quality and features are so flawed that a phone-camera is better, what's the point? It's a massively overpriced fidget-spinner for rich, impressionable fools who're easily parted with their money.
I started my photo passion with a Kodak Retina at age 14. It was manual, fstop, speed, and range-you had to do it all without a built in light meter. Since that time I’ve yearned for the same in a digital camera, and it’s been decades in the making. This camera seems to be the one I’ve been searching for. Having a durable and endearing camera today is a godsend. This camera is on order, but more importantly is that this will be something like the Retina, solid, exceptional and enduring.
So is the Fuji X100 series in case you don’t love your Q2. www.kenrockwell.com/fuji/x100v.htm
I used to read your reviews around 10 years ago - stumbled on your UA-cam channel and bam, your delivery and humour is very entertaining. I sold all my Nikon D700 gear around 6 years ago and 'think' this Q2 could be the camera for me. Expensive? Of course. But I'm worth it :)
You may be worth it, but know that LEICA is a lifestyle and affirmation. If you want great pictures, stick with Nikon. If you deserve nice things, consider this.
@@KenRockwellTV I hear you re Leica, but I truly like the idea of a full-frame fixed lens that has a Leica lens on it and is simple. I won't be buying Nikon again (having owned Nikon film cameras for 20 years before that D700 I had), maybe a mirrorless f/f Sony and a nice little Ricoh GR III. Heck, even a Fuji x100v or x-pro 3 would be nice, but because I prefer full-frame and Street photography is what I love most, it' seems it has to be the Leica Q2 for me (over an M10 plus lenses which would be super expensive and back to being big/weighty rather than small/light which is what I prefer more these days).
Ken “battery doors are for losers” Rockwell.
Amen, brother!
Ken Rockwell hahahahaha 👍
That made me chuckle too
I have a friend who posts Q2 photos and I always stop scrolling when I see them...even though the subject matter is nothing special, the image quality and character is unique and engaging in a way I can't explain, except that it reminds me of medium format.
Thanks!
Maybe he is just a good Photographer
It’s 2020, every camera review should include image comparison vs today’s smartphones, just like in this video. Thank you for including this. Every other reviewer fails to do this and they just kiss up to camera manufacturers and make excuses for flaws and shortcomings. I love your brutal honesty Ken, keep up the good work!
I’m so bad. Thanks!
Totally agree with you about cameras with too many functions/menus. I have a Fuji that I love but man it's sometimes too smart for its own good, or takes me 20min to remember all the settings each time I go on holiday. It's very complicated. I hope we see more cameras with dials where you can see exactly what you've set before even turning it on! Keep up the awesome vids!
Thanks!
As a Leica user devoid of snobbery (yes, we exist), I thoroughly enjoyed your delightfully snarky review. Very refreshing :-)
It’s not snobbery if it’s true. LEICAs are superior, a simple fact. Thanks!
@@KenRockwellTV Oh, stop it, lol. But I do like the simple operation and small size of my M. That's it in a nutshell. For me, the brand hoopla is the biggest downside.
That’s why I tape over the tell-tale red dot
DP Review gives it a "Gold" @ 84% -- I would have to agree, I love working with this camera, my D-850 stays at home and cries while I whore around all day and night with my Q2...
Thanks!
Your videos are improving exponentially ! - Plus your humor keeps things 'light' and very interesting (even when reading the tech specs)... Keep it up !📸
Thank you! I’m always learning.
“ Battery doors are for losers,” -Ken Rockwell Love this guys sense of humor; I hear he’s a pretty good photographer, too 👍
Thanks! Glad you get my point.
Thanks for this very thorough review. For those coming in now, they upgraded the firmware spring '22 in both the Q2 and Q2 Monochrom - they added 'highlight metering' which takes care of some of the blown out highlights, and while I don't really shoot much in JPG, they have improved the BW and colors you get out of camera, and they have improved its AF performance. I love mine and have very few gripes about it. The menu system and simple operations make this a no brainer. I like my Nikon Z system for other purposes, and I had to return the Fuji system as it was just too many options to deal with. Perfect for many people but I'm trying to reduce my decision making when I'm out enjoying photography.
Thanks, but my M3 www.kenrockwell.com/leica/m3.htm was perfect ever since introduction. So sad they too this long to get the Q2 sort of working. I’m not impressed when the users manual starts off with how to dispose of the product. My M3 manual needs no such words; M3s live forever like the work their masters create. Thanks!
@@KenRockwellTV Very pleased with my M6 original. Will last longer than I will, the digital most likely not....
If one camera attracted you because of its specs, another with better specs will do the same. And on and on like a dog chasing cars we go. The idea is to get the camera that summons the sorcerer within, a machine that inspires you, that motivates you to move and explore in places you haven’t before. And if this camera does that for you, then so be it.
Yes. Specs mean nothing. Thanks!
Because you are, despite your sarcasm, a Leica man, you can't quite hide your genuine enthusiasm for this camera. Not quite an M3, but hey ho.
All men appreciate LEICA. It’s only the small and shallow ones who deny it. Thanks!
Every shot is world class, love it 👏👏👏
At least for LEICA shooters. Thanks!
I finally pulled the trigger and shelled out for the Q2. Your review is so helpful and so funny! Thanks for the very useful technical review and the comedy/snark. I hope I can get past the lifestyle mystique and into the legendary Leica image look. Thanks, Ken!
Enjoy and thank you!
Just an amazing run thru of the Leica Q2 and it’s qualities and it’s weakness’. If you are thinking of purchasing the Q2, watch this video.
Thank you!
I bought the q2 to have a solid camera to take everywhere. And which is focused on quick taking photos. And which I can use everywhere due to its weather resistance. For me it's not a rich man's camera. It's the only camera on the market that fits my needs: relatively small, superb image quality, quick pic taking. Durability and weather resistance.
I think, Colors out of it in jpg look damn nice. Compared to my Sony cameras, photos out of the q2 always shine somehow. Though I like your review style, I had to comment something on this one. This is a niche camera and only fits a small group of people. You seem to be a happy iPhone shooter.
Thanks!
Superb review, thanks Ken!
Thank you!
I was surprised by several of your comments. Everyone reports that the autofocus is bad. I have a Q2 I am borrowing and the AF really is bad. And the White Balance is awful. I love your videos. very fast, very net. I also love that you talk about the the iPhone being great (nobody compares cameras to iPhones).
Who needs automatic focus? LEICA men know how focus. Thanks!
I love my Q. Hardly ever leave the house without it. I did not upgrade to the Q2 and do not need more than 24 MP. Sensor is better in low light. I like the colors, although the Fuji is for me still the best on skin color. Love your reviews, although you are color blind LOL
Thanks! I'm color-blind as my eyes have been seared shut by all the wild colors I've experienced in life.
@@KenRockwellTV It was meant with a twinkle in the eye. Keep on making honest and good videos. Thumbs up!
Have Q, go everywhere with it. Use cam phone emergency only.
I like this camera! No lenses to buy or carry around so in a way it’s worth it.
It’s a steal in the world of LEICA. Thanks!
LEICA cameras are Fashion Statement now, I'm not saying that it can't take great pictures, but 5000 dollars for a camera, I'm happy with my Fuji X100V.
The X100V has a built-in flash and takes better pictures. LEICA is about your image, other brands are actually about taking pictures. Thanks!
You are entitled to your opinion of course so do other people that have the same opinion for those that drive fast cars, fast women or smoke or anything else expensive. Everyone is entitled to spend their money how they please just like people who don't mind spending their earned money on Leica. Fashion statements ? more like a malady called The Great Green Giant.
@Spinach Not anyone, I bought mine for cash. wanted a Leica for 48 years since I started photography, but never could afford one until my retirement in 2019. I spend my hard earned cash on what I wanted and not what people like you dictate what I spend it on. Don't give a shit what others spend their money on, it's their choice which they are entitled to. Yes its jealousy when they are bothered what other people do with anything including their money. Incidentally I never smoked but calculated that I could have afforded a dozen Leicas if I wanted but one is more then enough.
Have you ever shot a single photo with a Leica or even held one? I don’t think so. Yet you condemn and thus show your ignorance. I’m glad you enjoy your excellent Fuji, but you know, you come across as suffering from a case of Leica envy.
Thanks Ken, always loved your written reviews and love you are doing video reviews. Thorough and straight to the point unlike the other hipster bearded guys who talk too much
Thanks! Nothing it the facts here. My written reviews will always be the gold standard, more complete, detailed and up to date than anything on YT. Thanks!
Shoot in RAW you will see much more resolution at higher ISO.
Thanks! Never knew that.
Reminds me I’d my old, trusty Hassy 500CM. Built like a tank with few knobs, dials & buttons!
God made HASSELBLAD so even LEICA owners would have something to dream about for Christmas.
@@KenRockwellTV 😂😂
It makes me a wee bit crazy when people bitch and moan about the price of the Leica Q2, so let’s put some perspective on that price. An equivalent resolution Canon R5 costs about $3900, body only and the roughly equivalent Canon 24mm F1.4 lens is $1550 making a total $5450. The same price point roughly applies to equivalent Sony A7R4 and lens and in both cases the Leica is far lighter and more discrete than those interchangeable lens cameras, albeit at the expense of that interchangeability.
The beauty of the Q2 is that you’re getting a $6000 Leica lens on a camera more powerful than the $7000 M10 for $5000. That’s a bargain no matter how you cut it even when compared to offerings from Canon, Nikon and Sony.
Q2 is a bargain. Thanks!
Decent review Ken . Your little digs about Leica photographers are funny.
And true! Thanks!
@@KenRockwellTV One thing Iv heard about this new lens is that while zoomed at 200 mm and minimal focus the actual focal length is only `140 mm Is that true ?
love how the battery loads in like a pistol magazine
EXACTLY!!!! Even easier and smoother than most gun mags. Thanks!
Same here, I don’t like the JPEG colors with any Leica, but you know Ken you can shoot DNGs with the Leica Q2; there’s a lot of videos out there that can teach you how if you don’t know.. From trying different brands I believe Leica has the most accurate colors. Yes we all like different colors but color accuracy is not about taste. Cheers.
I’m not going to expend creative effort to try to work around LEICAs crappy colors when I can shoot Nikon or Canon instead and get what I want so much more easily. Thanks for the suggestion!
Yes one should expect better JPEG colors from such an expensive camera and for someone shooting JPEG only, Leica is not a good choice but rather Fujifilm for its variety of in-camera profiles. For someone shooting RAW like most professional photographers, Leica’s colors are great (and accurate) SOOC with just a little tweak of expo/contrast/temperature (needed with any camera). “It’s a Leica, it’s not about pictures, it’s all about the image of the man making the picture”: I know it’s catchy/cool thing to say nowadays and there are indeed some collectors and/or just wealthy people who buy Leica products just for the look. I can also assure you there are many great/successful photographers that shoot with Leica cameras because they are great tools for photography and they unable, inspire to, assist the photographers to make/in making great images. I understand you’re trying to review as many cameras and lenses as possible and spending time to understand the true potential of a tool is not your priority but I feel this video is misinforming your many subscribers unless they’re here purely for entertainment. Cheers.
Hi Ken, great video. Thank you! I have the Fuji X100V and find the AF and the noise of the cropped sensor to be horrible. Would you consider this a big upgrade to that? I just want a good travel and everyday camera to document my family’s life
No, LEICA is for guys who want nice cameras. If you want great pictures, look at Canon or Nikon. For a small camera with a big sensor and big-boy tech quality, look at the EOS RP www.kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/rp.htm or Z5 www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/mirrorless/z5.htm
@@KenRockwellTV Wow, thanks for the recommendations on the Nikon and Canon models vs Leica. I might be getting pulled into the lifestyle thing- beautiful design and handling and simplicity of use from Leica, but I'm seriously reconsidering. All I want from pictures are good color and sharp detail. But then, something inconspicuous and easy to take with me (which might be lifestyle factors!). The Leica 47M pixels seem winning, though your review of Canon EOS RP is convincing. Have to go to my local camera store and see what's what, I guess!
K you know what to expect love you your honesty
Thanks, just being honest!
Why are you shooting JPG when you can shoot DNG?
Faster and looks better. All my life’s work fits on one HDD. I get more done faster and make more money doing it. Thanks! See also kenrockwell.com/tech/raw.htm
I own a Sony A7III, Sony Zeiss 55mm f1.8, Zeiss Loxia 35mm f2 and a Fujifilm X100F. I am a hobbyist, not a professional. I most shoot street photography, photojournalistic portraits and travel photography. I also take family pictures. I tend to use the Fuji X100F more than anything else (because of it’s convenient size and great looking JPEGS). But now, I’m wondering - should I trade all my gear in for a Leica Q2?
NO! LEICA is for adoration; not for taking pictures. The Fujifilm cameras work better and take better pictures. The LEICAs are just for bragging rights among your friends. Thanks!
Nice message. Did you get the Leica?
I own a nikon z6 with 35 and 85 z lenses and a Fujifilm x100v.
I won't sell my gear but love to get the Q2
The Fujifilm x100v is great but not better than my Nikon. The Fujifilm is nice but small
this is the most savage review ever.
Thanks! Just being honest.
Basic f/1.4 Leica lens - um, that's a Summilux which is one of the most beautiful, best engineered, and optically superior lenses on the planet. Might want to tone that down to the Cron line, bruv.
SUMMILUX is basic to LEICA, while the SUMMICRON reigns at the top. What’s the question? Thanks!
@@KenRockwellTV Lux = $$$, because of its build, fast apeture, and rendering. It has better coatings than the Cron and Rit lines. So .. no, its not basic. Its the luxury lens of the 3 unless you go Notilux.
@@KenRockwellTV Sure thing, Ken. I'll donate to your college fund for your 12 kids and white racist lifestyle.
Call me old.. but I remember when 1/2000 was an unbelievable figure and 1/20,000 is not enough? I suppose I could imagine a situation in which that would be needed... but it would exist in the imagination only, it seems to me... unless someone here can instruct.
I agree. No need for such foolish speeds. Better to have lower ISOs for ultra clean photos. Thanks!
I wish Leica will make a "Q" Camera with 60+ megapixels sensor, 9.5+ mill. dots EVF and Leica M mount !
LEICA answers and delivers prayers to the worthy. In jubilatae deum.
I am at a crossroads ... about sell a good amount of my camera kit for a .... Leica Q2! But, for the past year or so, I have been using Ricoh GR III - I do get some exceptional Black & White images. Decisions - Decisions!
If you have to splurge, it’s probably not for you. I prefer the X100F www.kenrockwell.com/fuji/x100f.htm and see www.kenrockwell.com/tech/comparisons/2020-06-leica-versus-iphone-versus-canon-versus-fuji.htm
Fantastic camera, if i ever get some disposable income, than i'll definetly replace my Beloved (but aging) Nikon Coolpix A with a REAL Leica (actually made by leica, i do not want a rebranded panasonic)
Thanks!
So Ken what I've deduced from this video is to properly shoot a Leica first you should hang it off you shoulder with it's fancy strap, then take out an Iphone and snap the picture! Just kidding! But I do agree these are great cameras, but really great accessories
Exactly. LEICA for the image, and iPhone for the picture. Thanks!
Very entertaining Ken - enjoyed that.
Thank you, Al
I am no longer a daily photographer and I find with modern cameras, I forget setting for features I rarely use. I wish I could afford something like this, but it is ok to dream.
Canon makes better cameras anyway. Thanks!
Very rich information about a legend .
Thank you!!!
I disagree with the comparison to an iPhone 11 Pro. You were shooting in Jpeg ( issue #1). The Leica takes a realistic photo of how the colors ACTUALLY appear to the human eye. The iPhone over saturates and darkens to make the photo more appealing. That’s doesn’t make the photos better. That makes them fake. Just my humble opinion.
I did enjoy your review but I disagree with the quality of the photos.
I was there. The scene looked as it does on the iPhone. Try it yourself. Thanks!
Phone... Too much fakery algorithm stuff.
Are you going to make a video about the desiderata Leica M11?
Of course. Need to get the time to get to it, and as always, the written review at KenRockwell.com (a.k.a. LeicaAuthority.com) will come out before and have much more detail (and be kept more up to date) than whatever I or anyone puts up at UA-cam. THANKS!!!!
@@KenRockwellTV Thanks very much! We all want to see a video from your iphone, better than any pro camera!
Awesome review!
Thanks!
Hi Ken, so many thanks for your always well explained direct to the point videos. I am thinking to buy one copy. Do you think the AF of the Q2 could a reliable camera for fast street shooting and by the other side, how is it's performance for night street photography also. So many thanks n God bless you. Regards, Ricardo.
iPhone is much faster. It’s what HCB would use. LEICA is about having a nice camera, not actually about taking pictures.
@@KenRockwellTV So many thanks for your comment.
One of the best cameras I've ever owned.
God bless and thanks!!!
Enjoyable video and you make some interesting points. it is so much money and you have got me thinking, is it worth it?
No. If you have to ask or it seems expensive to you, it most certainly is not worth it. This isn’t 1958; for the past couple of decades the LEICA is simply jewelry for men, an expensive bauble to consume idle cash.
I prefer Fuji because of usability and hand grip and viewfinder (oh god its awesome).... ///and colors, and presets, and video rec. and lenses... and (wow!) Fuji is lighter with a long focus optics. And yes, Olympus is lighter and more compact if you need just the 600mm lens or macro.
Thanks!
Hi. What about long exposure at high ISO? For $5000 it can’t do this - right? I’ve heard that Leica has put limitations on this camera. How do you get around this? What about the noise reduction that cannot be disabled - even in raw. Is that acceptable for a $5000 camera? I wanted to get one but these two issues are significant don’t you think ?
High ISOs are for when you can't make a long exposure because you're hand-holding. If you're on a tripod, use ISO 100 and done. Thanks!
There is a limit on the q2 on exposure time. I think it’s 120 or 240 seconds at iso 100. That is not long enough for a really long exposure at night especially if you’re into astrophotography for example... Even when you raise the iso to 6400, I think the camera gives you 4 seconds... something ridiculous. ua-cam.com/video/Apt1m8CoBV8/v-deo.html. Is this not a dealbreaker for a $5000 camera?
stefanmusic It brings the iso down the longer the exposure. 2 mins+ = 100 iso max, 1 min = 200 iso max, 30s = 400 iso, 15s=800 etc. So if you’re an astrophotographer, it’s not a good choice for you.
Thank you Jamie. That’s what I’ve been seeing around the web. They apparently put this in the camera to protect against sensor overheating. It’s unfortunate since the SL2 doesn’t have this limitation and has the same sensor.
Correct. Thanks!
Thanks for the review! As good as the Q2 looks and feels I ended up sticking to my X100V. I don't need 47MP, f2 is enough for me, Fuji handles low light better, the Q2 is too big, too heavy and too risky for street photography in some countries
Risky? LEICA owners always have people with them to handle that. Thanks!
Especially Russia, хаха
Russia, Costa Rica…
Thank you Ken for this great review and for the fun way you present it. I am struggeling a lot. 2 years ago I bought a Leica M10-P with the 35mm Summilux. I love it and after a heard day of work I can relax by going for a walk with the M or on my vacations shes a great companion. But I miss some things. For doing shootings sometimes I need AF. During my travelling I want to make videos. So I am thinking about selling the M and buying a Q2. What do you think about this idea? I also have the problem that I do not feel good to have such an expensive camera as the M. Ok the Q2 isnt cheap at all. But its nearly the half. Thanks :)
Use the iPhone for autofocus, and for video the iPhone is far superior. The answer is probably already with you. If price matters, then forget LEICA entirely and look to Canon or even Nikon. Thanks!
that sprinkler shot is really a great image!
That’s the advantage of always carrying the camera when you go for a walk! Thanks!
hello.. excellent video, I learned a lot with your advice.. one question.. I'm configuring the leica q2 camera for black and white photos.. and in JPG.. automatic iso and automatic speed, because when I take a photo, , do I see three? in different iso.?
See three what?
Awaiting some Olympus OMD EM1 reviews mate
Some fine day. Just gotta fond the time in between Canon Ninon Sony and Fuji.
Nice video Ken! What was the $150 dollar flash you used? I want one from my QP. :)
LEICA SF-24D www.kenrockwell.com/leica/sf-24d.htm
Hey Ken, after a long conversation with my common sense I bought the Q2… unboxing was exciting… it’s heavy and pretty. However before I could get totally carried away with German craftsmanship I took a peek into the viewfinder and to my horror saw a highly magnified hair or thread or stick embedded inside. Truthfully it looks like a tiny tree branch. B&H is taking it back as one would expect, but now I’m not so sure that I really want this camera and again wondering if the minimalist German esthetic is a myth.
If common sense matters, forget the LEICA. LEICA is all about life and who you are to your very core - it’s far more than a tool to make pictures. Like marriage, if you have to give it any thought at all, the answer is NO; LEICAs aren’t that good for making pictures. LEICAs are for lovers, not thinkers.
@@KenRockwellTV Thanks, Hmm, my interest in Lica was about simplicity, but not total paleo caveman simplicity. I can't relate to my joyless - overly complex Canon 6-R, so I though that the Lica would be a step back.
I own a Canon R6 but I’d love to rent a Q2 for a week!
Fun!
Nice objective review. However, I think that the ability to easily delete a picture, which I understand was cancelled in this version, is important. I doubt that there are many professional photographers who are completely satisfied with all of their pictures.
No, few pros are that good - but most pros don’t own LEICA. Everyone who owns LEICA is. That’s why they took off that button, it never was used by those who actually buy these cameras. Thanks!
I use a Leica Q2 for about 10 months now. Compare to my sony a7r3, here are my experience. Q2 is extremely intuitive to use, love the menu, how easy to operate with minimum number of bottoms and control. The lens is insanely sharp with beautiful bokeh. What I wish to have is a tilt screen. The camera metal body makes this thing much heavier than the size suggests, and it’s too big to fit in pocket. The color is subject to people, compare to Q, I suspect the chip is Japanese. Also it needs a fast card to give you decent speed. Personally I think Q1 is a better choice. However, no regret, this camera will probably outlast me.
Thanks! I just look at screen from an angle if I need it.
Xt4 - dedicated iso dial, dedicated exposure compensation dial.
But no bloodline. Thanks!
@@KenRockwellTV I agrre pedigree is a factor. Would you suggest q2 or Lieca cl with 18mm or 28mm prime. I currently own xt-4 and previously I was a Nikon shooter. I need imterchangeable lenses and cant afford m10.
If “can’t afford” is in your vocabulary, then don’t waste any time with LEICA. All depends what you want to shoot. Go Canon first, maybe Nikon.
@@KenRockwellTV I guess Leica will disagree with you on this. If they did not care about affordability, why have they brought c-lux, d-lux and v-lux in the market. I am not saying these are good cameras, but Leica is listening to ppl like us than just reviewers like You.
They brought those out for poor people lacking brains. Most if not all of those lesser leicas are simply Panasonic cameras with a LEICA logo for double the price . Look it up. Thanks!
35 sec .... "Leicas are not so much about a great picture, they're mostly about having a great lifestyle" ......lol
Truth! Thanks!
“iPhone takes better pictures?” I trust you were being sarcastic :).
iPhones do take much better pictures. Here's proof www.kenrockwell.com/tech/comparisons/2020-06-leica-versus-iphone-versus-canon-versus-fuji.htm and that was vs the old iPhone 11 Pro Max. See what I shot on iPhone 14 here www.kenrockwell.com/apple/iphone-14-pro-max.htm#sampleimages Unless you have an MFA from Yale, LEICAs are simply jewelry for men. Thanks!
IMMORTAL INSTRUMENT
THE LEICA MAN
MASTER OF LIGHT
Ken Rockwell our Lord and Savior
Thank you - but I’m not the Lord.
A review about taking photos with the said camera. Not information from the marketing department.
Thanks for noticing!
“Ultra low price” Ken, you’re in fantasy land.
Ultra low price compared to a real (M) LEICA. LEICAs are for the immortals www.kenrockwell.com/leica/leica-man.htm ; they are not consumer products. Thanks!
What I utterly fail to understand is the hype about resolution (detail capture) that one hears about the Q2 because of the 47 Mp, like it were some kind of world record. Simple math shows that that is about 54 Kp per square mm on the sensor. A more down-to-earth sensor like the APS-C on the Fuji X100V (26 Mp) (to which the Q2 is often compared) has about 71 Kp per sq mm. That's about 31% more detail on the X100V sensor. In addition, the 35 mm vs 28 mm effective focal length means that, at any given distance, the Q2 captures (if I get the math right) an area about twice as large as the X100V. Resolution? Detail? It's ok to argue about a possibly lower noise on the Q2 because of less crammed pixels, but certainly not more detail!
It is a LEICA. Its superior optics and bloodline create better pictures far beyond mere mathematics. Danke!
Good things come to those who wait. And save. But Fuji is coming out with a near 60 meg sensor near the end of the year. And Fuji is king of the jpegs, which will probably top 20 megs. And it will be metal, and not 5 grand. And you can bet they'll have a spectacular lens to go with that sensor.
Thanks!
I heard from other reviewers that the Q1 has better ISO performance than Q2. You gave a raving review for the Nikon Z50. If you had only one camera to take, would you take the Q2 or the Z50?
Z50 takes much better pictures, by far. Q2 is jewelry; Z50 is for taking pictures. Thanks!
@@KenRockwellTV Ok you made up my mind. I'll go ahead and buy the Z50
just don't forget you need some lens for z50 lol
@ 0:35 "Leica's 're not so much about a great pictures, they're mostly about having a great lifestyle..."
Exactly. Thanks!
You should always shoot in RAW with a Leica. The colors will be extraordinarily.
Everything about LEICA transcends.
Hi Ken, great review for a great camera. On my Q2 for JPEG size file I have three options, Large, Medium and Small. I thought you stated that is one size....!
One compression ratio. Three pixel sizes. Thanks!
It's all about... well, paying that kind of money to look cooler, I put a Russian turret viewfinder on my Fuji XM-1, (which really works) and picked up a used Hassy 120mm f4 Makro to adapt to it, I think I look pretty cool. (Yeah, a lens hood would make it much cooler) and I paid less than 500. for all three. Which I printed on my tie that I wear when I walk around with this. I didn't mention that my monopod doubles as a satellite launcher and morse code decoder....
Thanks!
Thanks for the review. I enjoyed it and I'm convinced that this camera isn't for me. I guess I'm not a 'Lecia Immortal'. I regularly shoot with a Sony RX1RII. The images that this camera delivers is amazing, especially for its age and small size. It's also great in low light, not as good as my A7III but acceptable. I recently acquired the Sigma FP to shoot in low light (it has great high low light performance better than the A7III in my experience) and with interchangeable lenses. The colors that come out of Sigma and Summilux 50/1.4 still isn't better than the RX1RII. It would be great to see you reviewing that older camera.
Thanks!
And the RX1R had even better colors and low light abilities, yes slow AF, I know but IQ in stills are still competitive with an Fujifilm x100v
What are your thoughts on the Leica Q2 MonoChrom?
Like all LEICA, it is for the people who deserve it. LEICA doesn’t exist in a vacuum; it existed for those whose work is at a level which demands it. Does yours? Thanks!
@@KenRockwellTV Thanks for your response. No, but I have cash and I want it. Lol.
Great video ken !!!
Toda raba!
after creating so much cintent, you are likely to contradict yourself.
yz pooh-poohed clear image zoom on Sony, A7 series, liked A99 electronic tele converter, now Q2 crop modes. he 2013 Sony A7II had this....beats post-processing crops - see framing at time of capture, the look. Has superb sweep pnorama - perfect stitching in landsxape and portrait - beats iphone, no bugs like contemporaneous Nikon software. also Superior Auto & Intellegent Auto - fast compensation of complex omiplex lighting - back-lighting,side-lighting. Q3 has phase-detect AF, sadly missing on the Q2.
LEICA is a special case; it comes directly from the gods above rather than Man. Thanks !
No distortion of the lens... So that's different to Q or QP?
Older Q and QP cameras I believe used the same lens. No difference - but I haven’t bothered actually testing the obsolete cameras to be sure. In-camera processing could be different; with LEICA we don’t trifle with yesterday’s news. Thanks!
Older Q and QP cameras I believe used the same lens - but I haven’t tested the obsolete cameras to be sure. In-camera processing could be different; again I haven’t tried the old models. Thanks!
@@KenRockwellTV I can tell you with Q I'm getting bang on shots day after day, rarely miss a shot. I don't get good results with verticals especially near the edges, it's why I asked the question. Qtography is a joy + efficient, high keeper rate, stealthy. I wouldn't mind a Fuji 35 mm as a second camera.
so if I understand correctly it takes worse pictures than an iphone? Thanks, I saved myself the expense. With your smiles you have painted this camera as trash. You have a lot of experience and I assume you have no malice against Leicas, even if you initially state that you don't like them. I do not know, but there is something that does not convince me
LEICAs are for guys who want nice cameras. iPhones and Canons and Nikons are for people who want to make great pictures. LEICAs are more jewelry for men.
Look at the pictures, and this was against the ancient iPhone 11. iPhone 14 now has more resolution than the Q2. www.kenrockwell.com/tech/comparisons/2020-06-leica-versus-iphone-versus-canon-versus-fuji.htm
@@KenRockwellTV so having an iphone that has a 1/1.3 inch sensor compared to a Full frame, I already have everything. We can throw away all the cameras in the world. Even if they were slightly better than the iPhone 13pro, nothing will justify buying any camera now or in the future. Ah, I forgot, the iphone 14 has bigger lenses. More light will enter. And they will be better than all the goals on earth. So I suppose that from tomorrow you will close your blog and your website and you will only deal with mobile phones. Wow!!! At Leica they are amateurs and they don't know it
Superb.
Thank you!!!
It _guess_ it's an _okay_ camera. For a digital.
I was lucky enough to have lived near a professional photo lab where I could get a roll of any film in any format developed for $5, pushed or pulled for free up to three stops- and I took full advantage. But for some unfathomable reason, I decided to learn on, then _exclusively_ use a crunchy $39 Russian knockoff of a Barnack Leica called a "Zorkee" (ew) with its included collapsible 50mm for many years. I don't know man, my excuse is that every teenager is at least a little bit of a psychopath. This lasted for several years until the film lab closed down forever after repeated smash-and-grab robberies. This isn't a Portra-colored 90s' story by the way, this was like 2015. I was still in high school.
That time was good. Its dim uncoupled viewfinder meant my naive beginner mind could not be led astray from the righteous path by the temptations of bokeh-lust. Its clunky but clearly marked controls taught me to predict action and think about changing light. The low but non-zero cost of bulletproof consumer-grade films forced me to consider each shot somewhat, taught me to meter with my head, and rewarded me with beautiful colors that actual geniuses perfected over multiple generations. I was lucky enough not to know what the word "highlights" even _meant_ until my local film lab got robbed out of business. The ability to shoot endlessly with digital never even appealed to me. Who cares about being able to take a million pictures for free, when that only means worrying about bulk, batteries, noise, crushed shadows, ugly blown highlights- a million times?
After getting kicked out of the 35mm Garden of Eden overnight, I decided it was probably a good time to learn about this newfangled "digital photography" thing- and my god it was horrible. I'm not old enough to remember what happened back in the day, but from bits and pieces of information I could gather, I arrived at the conclusion that some unrecorded global catastrophe must have happened around the year 2001, possibly related to Dick Cheney and an insurance scam on some office buildings. I don't know, maybe you can verify that one for me, Ken. Anyway, I claim that this mysterious cataclysmic event for some reason caused literally every camera manufacturer (except like Leica and Zeiss) to forget what _usable cameras_ were supposed to be like, and made them churn out endless streams of *laggy plastic gameboy readymade e-waste with zero dynamic range* onto the market until... present day actually, in so many ways. For a period of about 10 years, every single compact camera was garbage and the entire concept of "reasonably small wide angle prime for ANY system, under $2000" straight up did not exist- and nobody seemed to have even noticed during that time. People talk about a coming "digital dark age," but I think I saw one happen already.
The fact that my sand-filled pocket-tractor of a rangefinder, an actual hunk of SHIT that would have been considered *already outdated* and an *objectively awful* machine on the very day it was _assembled by literal orphans using stolen tools-_ would actually end up _sheltering_ me from the wasteland of the digital market, is a bit worrying to say the least. I was lucky enough not to know what the word "highlights" even _meant_ until my local film lab got robbed out of business. The ability to shoot endlessly with digital never even appealed to me. Who cares about being able to take a million billion pictures for free, when that only means worrying about bulk, batteries, noise, crushed shadows, ugly blown highlights- a million billion times?
I was technically spared from all of that digital camera nonsense because I soon met an fool on Facebook Marketplace who sold me his M240 for $2000. I showed up believing it was stolen, but this _nerd_ had actually held onto every last scrap of packaging and paperwork related to the camera like an actual insane person. I asked him why he was selling it, half expecting a badly-constructed lie about , but the idiot had been using it for _video_ with _adapted Canon DSLR lenses_ and was dissatisfied by the clunkiness of the setup and resulting video- which he played for me on an iPad, unsolicited. I asked no further questions and completed the purchase hoping I wasn't having some fever dream.
It wasn't a dream. I'm using the thing with a $50 lens I ordered from Ukraine and a Voigtlander, and I am enjoying the decadent luxury of a combined VF/RF. And my god, what a disappointing camera it still is. It's nice certainly, but not like "retailed for the price of a decent used car at the time" nice. For all that money, it was still fatter and heavier than a svelte film M, and I still had to worry about silly digital things like sensor dust, long exposure noise, dynamic range, and batteries. No matter how long the battery life is, the simple fact of having a "timer" over my head when the camera is "switched on" (still a blasphemous concept to me) affects how I approach photography, and I don't like it. Not to say that I would never think about latitude when using negative film, but it was usually more of a "brief consideration" and not "disappointment and bargaining" as is typically the case with digital.
For some reason Portra costs like $40 per roll nowadays, and only people who bought Bitcoin in 2011 can afford film now... so I guess all I can do is eventually cough up for an M11.
...and still have to live with a silly battery time limit. 😭
Stay spry and un-probed, Mr. Rockwell.
I’ve gotten my film at B&H and Adorama since the 1970s! Always been much less expensive there; NEVER buy at a local store. www.bhphotovideo.com/c/buy/Roll-Film/ci/2545/N/4294548524/BI/287/KBID/1037
Get a Fuji X100 V for a fraction of the cost, a cheaper, lighter, more practical, more elegant camera, I get amazing pictures out of my Fuji. In today's technology, all cameras are good. Incredible pictures have absolutely nothing to do with the camera.
Exactly. The LEICA is a plaything for the well off, nothing more.
First review I've seen on the q2 that exposes its warts. I'm convinced: it's not worth $5600
If you have to ask, no, of course it's not worth it. LEICA is jewelry for men, the price always exceeds a LEICA's function. Thanks!
What do you mean by Leica isn’t about the picture but the lifestyle? I prefer my Q2 and M10 OOC pictures over any other brand except Nikon. If you were a salesman trying to sell me a 5k camera just for “ the lifestyle”, then I’m not sure I would buy it. I think that 28mm on the q2 is the best out there.
As we agree, Nikon takes better pictures. I’m not a salesman. LEICA is for playboys, like a Porsche. It’s not a camera for taking pictures anymore than a Porsche turbo is about taking kids to school or getting groceries.
Ken Rockwell yes Ken, but later on in the video you mention that the Q2 doesn’t need a delete button since all pictures taken with it are perfect unlike Canon and Sony, etc. it seems you’re contradicting yourself a little.
I’m kidding. Geesh, don’t take me so seriously. Did you know the internet says that my computer’s photo trash can empties straight to National Geographic? Thanks!
LEICA is about a comfortable and enjoyable lifestyle, first and foremost.
Love your video, so far I only can afford this Leica via a Video perhaps... My question I always asked but never got an answer--what is the macro ratio? 4:1 as most pseudo macro lenses or a real 1:1???
Look at the watch picture and do the math yourself: that’s as close as it gets. Looks like about 1:3 or so, certainly not 1:1. Thanks!
Thank you for your reply, 1:3 is certainly more a advertising gimmick than a useful macro.--Still, better than nothing.
Cheers and keep up the good work
Martin
Nice to finally put a voice to the words. Cheers!
Thanks!
All the Sony GM and Most of the G's have aperture rings
Excellent.
Can you help us with D Lux 7 review pls? Thanks
D LUX isn't real LEICA, is it? I wish I had the time, but with so many lesser brands putting out "cameras" today I have to limit myself to the Barnack-Format (24x36) cameras. I need to get to the M10P next. THANKS!
It’s about having a great lifestyle, bro wtf are you talking about. Leicas are not for rich ppl. It’s for true Photographers that want a more perfect camera.
Thanks!
Mikey Estrada , yeah, Leica is great! You might take a bunch of pictures before you notice your lens cap is on...
At $5k, I am contemplating on this Q2 or the X1D
Easy: if you want a premium camera, LEICA is superb. If you want great photos, stick with Nikon or Canon. I’ll admit I’ve never bothered with the Hasselblad digital because I prefer my German Zeiss lenses on my 500 series system. Thanks!
Don’t forget the great Fuji GFX 50R, just $3,500 now. www.kenrockwell.com/fuji/gfx-50r.htm
Comared to iPhone 11 ? What are you talking about Sir. iPhone sensor and saturated images are so ugly. Why do you like high saturation photos ? You dont take advantage of a Leica properly.
Yeah, I am not worthy. No living artist is worthy of the LEICA, only the masters past.
Ken Rockwell your so full of bullshit, so arrogant, but I guess you fool some people
Why is it grown men go weak at the knees at the mention of Leica... Partly, I think, because everyone know that they cost so much, and are slightly quirky (read flawed). I actually thought that a lot of those pictures were really good, the detail is stunning. That will be the lens then. Sony sensor? And how are they with firmware updates? Olympus make the most attractive cameras, what a pity they never stuffed a full frame sensor in them. If you've got the money, you'd buy one.
Thanks!