Siskel and Ebert The Worst Movies
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 сер 2024
- PayPal - PayPal.Me/TMMMKMP
Around the beginning of the year I had done a compilation of various Worst Movie that #SiskelandEbert have reviewed over the years well in this 2 hour extravaganza we witness every year's worst films from 1980 to 1998, some years had three terrible films, some had just one. So sit back and witness the very worst movies ever!
Unfortunately not all reviews exist for some of them so I had to go to the "Worst of" episodes to get the missing ones.
#WorstFilms
I saw Patch Adams in the theater. One of the things I hated most about it, even as a 14-year-old, was that it was bad - not funny or interesting - and it was trying so desperately to be important and touching. It wouldn’t have been so bad if it didn’t take itself so seriously (which is really ironic considering what the story is about).
One of my favorite EBERT Reviews in print. This fan for over 4 decades would like to see much of Ebert and Siskel's movie reviews (and other miscellaneous articles) reprinted in several volumes pblished by the LIBRARY OF AMERICA. (And even Ebert broached the idea of this happening to Pauline Kael). One thing for sure: these nifty volumes would be much lighter and convenient than those annual reviewbooks (Ebert only) that were once put around Christmas time.
The good old days when the worst thing that Bill Cosby did was to star in Leonard, part 6
As far as WE knew, anyway.
😂
Bill Cosby was doing those terrible things in the eighties. Celebrities had more protection without social media exposure
He managed to ruin one of the best sitcoms in history. I don't think anyone wants to watch him play a gynecologist.
Oh except he was completely exonerated; that’s why he’s out of prison now
Roger's review of Leonard Part 6 gets funnier every time I see it. "How hilarious. How highly, highly humorous."
And it is as awful as they said it is. I saw it sometime last year, and I couldn't believe how bad it was. Even some of the stuff that gets bad laughs doesn't redeem it at all for me. I actually do think it's the worst movie I've ever seen.
It's great and Gene is cracking up when he says that.
Roger's review of 'North' was rather tame compared to his printed review!
"I hated this movie. Hated hated hated hated hated this movie. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant audience-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the audience by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it."
Stroker Ace was 10 years in development and Burt turned down Terms of Endearment for it! Bob Clark (director of Porky's 2) is responsible for both some of the best and the worst films of all time.
We "The People" watching these old reviews are the last ones that matter.
We miss you guys. We sure could use you...these days.
Then and Now: When discussing Amityville II, Siskel actually has to explain to the viewer what a "prequel" is. You can almost hear the quotation marks when he says it.
I looked forward to their worst of episodez. seemed more fun to watch than the best of.
Your 100% Correct!
It was fun to watch and see what they picked. Sometimes it would be a surprise and I'd have to think back to the original show and see they were saying it was bad and would reappear on the worst of the year show. Sometimes when an obvious choice didn't appear I'd figure they didn't have room for it or wasn't worth it to trash again.
Agreed. I love to hear the two of them trash a bad movie. Relatable and articulate. I also love listening to them disagree.
I agree.
Ishtar was an theatrical abortion. Probably one of the worst movies ever made.
Ishtar was f-ing awful because everything went wrong during the making of that movie. It could not have been good.
The adjectives "dumb" and "stupid" for the secret of my success had me rofl 🤣
8:25 jack lemmon is always like , look at me acting!
that's so true
but i liked him in glengarry glen ross he was perfect!
Thank you, he is so beloved I have sometimes questioned myself as to what I'm missing. First two movies I saw him in were The Odd Couple and The Fortune Cookie. He played such miserable characters I didn't watch any more of his films for years. Eventually, I saw The China Syndrome and he was miserable in that one too, but at least he had a good reason.
Absolute slander. Have you seen The Apartment? Jack Lemmon rocks.
@@HenryNooney there should have been a scene of him changing the sheets after his boss was done
What Gene says at 1:15:30 ish makes me glad he didn't live to see what dreck is getting put out these days.
This is a much skinnier Ebert than I’m used to seeing
The good old days when the most a celebrity could steal from you was five bucks for a shitty movie.
I do appreciate how much these guys enjoyed each other. They chuckled hard after each other's most savage digs. This is straight male love.
or simply a BROMANCE with some seemingly SIBLING RIVALRY involved.
I agree with Roger here. Six Weeks was just awful. Guh-ross. Loathed it when it first came out, haven't changed my mind yet. Don't appreciate cheap emotional manipulation.
I don't think Willow should be in this video they didn't hate it that much
I think Siskel hated it way more than Ebert. Roger gave it 2.5 stars, which is still a thumbs down, but could be a lot worse.
I'm starting to see some of these S&E movie review compilation YT sites that are centered on a theme for the sake of broadened interest, fan theme, etc. Love them all. This one, I noticed that the audio of some of the clips goes off stereo, like at the beginning.
Their review of ''She's out of control'' is epic.
Very few people on Earth had a greater influence on my values and my tastes than these two. They are missed
Thank you for this beauty!
They were wrong about the Three Amigos
I don’t understand why one scene is blacked out, but a different scene from the SAME isn’t, such as “Under The Cherry Moon”
I've wondered the same thing. It doesn't happen often, but I have seen that more than once.
Steve Buscemi made "Armageddon" tolerable.
Drop Dead Fred was some hot garbage.
I dated a girl years ago who told me this was her favorite movie of all time. Like, what?!? I’ve hated movies that others loved many many times, but this one truly confused me.
Jesus Christ Roger's line on "Target" is at best deceptive here if not outright stupid. The whole fucking point of the movie is that Hackman is NOT an ordinary guy at all.
I LOVED the Three Amigos. And it would be so much better if you insert chapters into the video.
Puzzling because ‘I Spit on Your Grave’ was made in 1978
It was their choice for the worst of 1979, there are times they have reviewed films before and/or after the release year
That would still be my vote for worst film ever released.
It was re-released in 1980 as " I Spit On Your Grave" after failing at the box office in 1978 as "Day of The Woman".
"Day of the Woman"? Did SNL come up with that!?
norman d. golden II would of been a great kid for home alone 3, had they made it around this time
Their biggest fail was not liking Silence of the Lambs, which in my view is a perfect movie. Ebert is the same guy who liked dreck like Last House on the Left and Henry, Portrait of a Serial Killer, two trash films.
Heaven's Gate is a misunderstood masterpiece, d'you hear? A MASTERPIECE!
The re-edited version released a few years ago is much better than the version they reviewed here, which was a mess.
Well, uh, that is what Cimino seems to be saying off camera in every shot of this film as every scene drags and drags and drags. It's been 44 years since that movie was released and sorry, I just don't appreciate it now as I didn't then. But I'm so glad you DID - because I'm glad that Cimino left this earth knowing people DID like his 3 hour and 40 minutes version. I just wish he didn't make the decision to pull the film and just let it fade out of theaters - because then we would be arguing about a movie instead of arguing about a NOTORIOUS movie that bombed.
@@user-uq6sz6po3d
A: I assume they reviewed the 1981 Director's Second Edit [149 min] (for nationwide release) since the Premiere Version [219 min] only was shown at the Cinema 1 in New York City, NY and Toronto, Canada
B: You still batching Heaven's Gate (1980) since it got resurrected by MGM/UA for Home Video release in for CED release, and received a preliminary critical re-evaulation by showing the Premiere Version on Z Channel in 1982?
Why don't cancerous film critics try "Inchon" (1981)?
Pros:
Less offensive than "The Green Berets" (1968) [according to Vincent Canby from The New York Times]
Ben Gazzara's voice sounds like Batman [funny he didn't win a Razzie, lol]
Jerry Goldsmith's Score [main reason why this film, obviously still has the remaining light of the film]
Cons:
The 105 min version omit David Janssen and Rex Reed from the 1982 Official Release from MGM/UA Entertainment Co.
The only Razzie Award winning film to have not ever received a Home Video (due to the fact that the film was produced by One-Way Productions = funded by Unification Church by Sun Myung Moon) to make matters more bitter? We currently have a TV recording of the film from a channel formerly called GoodLife TV Network which thankfully puts the scenes cut from the 1982 version back in again annoyingly mutes cussing, like 'Goddamn' and 'Shit' etc.
Long story, short: How many of you Eborsisks out there can name or know any film (outside of this interesting radioactive guilty pleasure), that have not received a Home Video release of any kind?
Good Luck 🙂
The idea of the DIRECTOR's CUT version of a DVD (or VHS) release began with this film. Michael Cimino would complain that his cinematic vision was tampered with by the studio and you're not getting the full picture, as it were.
@@TheJameslehrdon’t forget ridley scott who had to recut his directors cut
The three lowest layers of the worst actressing:
Tea Leoni
Melanie Griffith
every cnt out there now
Scarlett Johansson is a terrible actress who is actually successful.
Come on now some new blood has been good like Stone, Zendaya, and Pugh
i wuda paid twice as much to see mr payback only once. 😂 good one siskel
Highlander 2 was the worst movie of all time. Killed all the goodwill from the hardcore fans who loved the original.
On the other hand, it's a wonderful film for people who absolutely love sparks!
Highlander: There *should* only be one!
While a terrible sequel to Highlander. It had a cool Sci-Fi concept with the Shield and how can you not love Michael Ironside chewing up the scenery as a villain.
So no I gotta say it's not the worst movie of all time.
@@jokerz7936 I'm of the opinion that perhaps the screenplay was written as a sci-fi concept which didn't involve the Highlander characters, and then, after the producers purchased it, the characters were shoehorned in? I may be wrong, but I think that's why there's all this stuff about them being from another planet, and the shield, and Ramirez coming back to life, etc., that had audiences scratching their heads. (I remember thinking, when I went to the theater to see it [that's right, I actually saw this movie in a theater way back then when it was first out], "Whaaaa-? Now they're from another planet all of a sudden? When did this happen?") I think they didn't want to write a sequel which would've basically been a remake of the first one; they wanted their characters involved in a different kind of story, and maybe this was the best one they could find where their characters could be used. Something similar happened with the unmade Total Recall sequel, where they were going to adapt Philip K. Dick's "The Minority Report" -- imagine the Tom Cruise movie, but with the location changed to Mars, Ahhnold's Douglas Quaid character in the Chief John Anderton role and with psychic mutants in place of the precogs. That actually might've worked.
I think the producers of Highlander II thought this movie could work. They should've thought twice. The problem is that the original film's story already provided closure and any kind of continuation of it was illogical, no matter what they decided to do for a sequel.
I hate them both but I think I would rewatch the sequel if I had to pick
That's the Chicago theater on State St at the end. That was not the actual theater.
Roller skating in the 1890s west?
I liked Willow 😎
Rik Mayal was awesome in The Young Ones and Black Adder. Didn’t translate to US humor.
Hands up who likes me!.... 😐 😐 😐
They didn't hold back 😂
I think HEAVEN’S GATE is a flawed but beautiful movie. I saw it in the theater in a restored cut, and it knocked my socks off. Cimino was just ahead of his time.
H'sG gave rise to the DIRECTOR's CUT version of DVD (and VHS) releases. On the DVD commentary he'd probably be complaining about his artistic vision being interfered with.
"It's more mediocre, than it is terrible..." Wait, is he describing the movie, or EVERY Tim Allen performance?
I wish they could see the new DUNES
'Willow' isn't that bad of a movie.
I liked Target.
Was 98 siskel last year?
1999 was but up until February
@@themagnificentmrmcgee thank you. It was a very informative and entertaining video
The Amityville 2 - The Possession is a terrific horror movie.
It’s fun trash
Yeah it's a fun scary movie! (which is more than can be said for all the other Amityville movies, yeesh.)
39:05 lmao
1:37:59 The Greatest!
Dune was 1984 film was excellent. It was 2000 series that was trash. I haven't seen the 2021 movie & don't intend to.
That's a shame..it's rather incredible while being true to the novel..I can't wait for part 2..
Thank you for telling us
@@paulpreston5328part 2 was somehow even better 👌🏻
The 2021 version was critically acclaimed and even nominated at the Oscars for Best Picture, so you should in fact watch it if you liked the original.
dune 1984 was better but the whole dune universe is boring.
Why are you blurring out things that are on 10 places on UA-cam? Bad video. Very very bad video. Not worth watching.
I say it once, I say it for the millionth time, it’s because of copyright, the filmmakers/studios will literally flag up some clips/reviews because of the footage of their movies and UA-cam will block the video if there’s not some sort of blur which is irritating but as I keep mentioning time and time again it’s the only way to prevent it getting blocked
ads on this youtube is ridiculous
the worst movie in history would be deer hunter or anything produced by robert de niro movies such as bronx tale
Wtf are you talking about
Bizarro world comment.
@@johnclavis i was talking about the worst movies ever made?
i forgot to mention Grand torino /clint eastwood also Batman or darknight with heathe ledger as the joker and as much AS I LOVE my man Christian Bale a superb actor the movie LACKED substance NO ONE DIED IN THAT MOVIE!
@@Lewis5020 why ? it came up and i expanded upon that comment GROW UP
@@fredrezfield1629 No one died in The Dark Knight? What about Two-Face? How about all the people killed by the Joker?
Ebert’s 👍 for Cop an a Half should automatically invalidate all his prior thumbs down.
lies
Egotistical film critics..... They are absolutely no use to the world whatsoever. A bit like music critics really,
Everyone who watches movies and cares about them is a critic. Siskel & Ebert were no different other than they got paid for it. Lucky bastards.
@@user-uq6sz6po3d That's true in most cases, But you do get a real egotistical vibe off these guys. But, in the end it's all theatre. Exaggerated responses for entertainment purposes, Anyway, their both dead now so who cares,
If you don't care, why are you here?
@@user-uq6sz6po3d Why do you care so much about the fact that I don't care? 🤣
@@user-ew2ms9yr4lIt's good to care about things, I think.
These men are pawns.