Irodov Problem 1.199 | Center of Mass Frame | Angular Momentum Conservation | Maximum Extension

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 65

  • @sairajat4824
    @sairajat4824 4 роки тому +5

    Sir its a blessing to study from you. Advanced questions don't seem tough anymore pls keep giving adv level questions for jee adv 2020

  • @sunritroykarmakar4406
    @sunritroykarmakar4406 4 роки тому +4

    this playlist was the best..cm frame concept cleared thanks to you sir

  • @ishaanagarwal5547
    @ishaanagarwal5547 4 роки тому +5

    Fabulous problem and solution💙COM frame analysis is too good.

  • @Tracks777
    @Tracks777 4 роки тому +4

    lovely stuff

  • @wdivyankop
    @wdivyankop 3 місяці тому

    best playlist on whole youtube for mee ........

  • @Trax2551
    @Trax2551 4 роки тому +5

    Hello sir .I am in class 12(2021batch) and want to start pathfinder now and I don't think I would be able to solve the entire book. So can you please suggest me which section( MCQ, build your understanding etc.)of pathfinder is important for jee advance.

    • @PhysicswithAkashGoyal
      @PhysicswithAkashGoyal  4 роки тому +3

      first finish your regular assignments, previous year questions, selected IRODOV problems and then if you have time and feel confident enough then only start Pathfinder and you can target doing MCQ of each chapter first.

    • @atikshagarwal5147
      @atikshagarwal5147 2 роки тому

      @@PhysicswithAkashGoyal Sir i have done jee relevant portion of irodov of whatever has been taught till now(in 11th)..I don't really have much time to solve another book so is doing pathfinder absolutely necessary or something? I go to Fiitjee and do 85%of their material.

  • @shivx3295
    @shivx3295 2 дні тому

    sir ji in com frame kinetic energy is 1/2(mu)vrel^2 but in reduce mass frame there is additional 1/2Mvcm^2 term

  • @rishabhsingh3670
    @rishabhsingh3670 2 роки тому

    Any method without using angular momentum??

  • @Dilip077
    @Dilip077 2 роки тому

    sir Why have you taken velocity along spring to be same for both blocks in the final state?

  • @Piyushthote0867
    @Piyushthote0867 7 місяців тому

    Why not -1/2 kx² as speing elongated

  • @binodininayak1876
    @binodininayak1876 4 роки тому +1

    Sir can we conserve angular momentum about a moving point?

    • @krishgarg2806
      @krishgarg2806 Рік тому

      if we are in its frame and we properly apply psuedo forces, then yes.

  • @harshitkashyap7531
    @harshitkashyap7531 3 роки тому

    Why gravitational potential does not came in account as disc move up with velocity v and reach some height h where its final velocity will become zero then there will be maximum extension

    • @PhysicswithAkashGoyal
      @PhysicswithAkashGoyal  3 роки тому +1

      Read carefully.
      In the first line it is given that system is on a smooth horizontal floor and all the motions are along the surface.

  • @vedbrahmbhattiit-j4497
    @vedbrahmbhattiit-j4497 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks sir awesome explanation 😀🔥👍🏻loved it 🙏

  • @Pratham._.Kamath
    @Pratham._.Kamath 4 роки тому +3

    Sir in the first method, why haven't you considered the gravitational potential energy of the particle of mass m at the instant when the spring achieves maximum elongation???Shouldn't the potential energy of the particle be included in the equation of conservation of energy?

    • @PhysicswithAkashGoyal
      @PhysicswithAkashGoyal  4 роки тому

      The system moves on a horizontal plane.
      And if you are talking about gravitational pe of the two point mass system in the question then it's very much negligible and should not be accounted if there is NO hint in the question

    • @Pratham._.Kamath
      @Pratham._.Kamath 4 роки тому

      @@PhysicswithAkashGoyal Got it. Thank you sir

    • @sanjaymehala1233
      @sanjaymehala1233 4 роки тому

      @@Pratham._.Kamath even if u take the difference will be zero irrespective of the size of the body

  • @raghuchireddy912
    @raghuchireddy912 4 роки тому +1

    Sir can u plz tell how will the approach change if they were connected with a string and we were asked to find tension in the string during their subsequent motion

    • @adityaswaroop7430
      @adityaswaroop7430 7 місяців тому

      in such cases, there has to be non-conservative force provided otherwise if we ignore the non-conservative force effect, then the final velocity would be v0 and T=mv^2/R..

    • @adityaswaroop7430
      @adityaswaroop7430 7 місяців тому

      just a centrifugal force equation.

  • @mohityadav8512shree
    @mohityadav8512shree 4 роки тому +1

    sir plz upload questions realted to thermodynamics

  • @sanjaymehala1233
    @sanjaymehala1233 4 роки тому

    aakash ji why cant we solve it via reduced mass method
    because we do not know the final relative velocity ?
    please help!!

  • @vedbrahmbhattiit-j4497
    @vedbrahmbhattiit-j4497 3 роки тому

    Sir plz explain why did u add Kcm in kinetic energy term ? We will only use Kwrt Cm only 🙏😀plz clear my doubt sir🙂🙏

  • @chiragmaheshwari9769
    @chiragmaheshwari9769 4 роки тому +1

    Sir, in first question "kx" will always be acting perpendicular to disc .. so work done by force to change v° will be zero.. so v° should not change?
    (ie v2=v° always)

    • @chiragmaheshwari9769
      @chiragmaheshwari9769 4 роки тому

      ?

    • @PhysicswithAkashGoyal
      @PhysicswithAkashGoyal  4 роки тому

      Spring is initially perpendicular to velocity Not after that... I have explained this in the solution...

    • @shashikantmaurya1038
      @shashikantmaurya1038 4 роки тому

      @@chiragmaheshwari9769 brother its perpendicular intially and for max elongation it again has to get perpendicular

  • @sarjeraopatil8088
    @sarjeraopatil8088 4 роки тому

    Sir why can't we use reduced mass directly here??

    • @PhysicswithAkashGoyal
      @PhysicswithAkashGoyal  4 роки тому +5

      Normally to find Maximum extension we equate spring energy at maximum extension with 1/2 * (mu) (Vrel)^2. this will give correct result only if velocities are along the line joining the particles. and at the time of maximum extension Vrel becomes zero.
      But here Vrel is not zero..... component of relative velocity is zero along line joining the particles but not zero perpendicular to it.

  • @musicloverr547
    @musicloverr547 3 роки тому

    Best analysis from com.. 😍

  • @dakshjain4727
    @dakshjain4727 3 роки тому

    sir i have a doubt that spring force is always perpendicular to velocity so why is velocity changing?

  • @pm7870
    @pm7870 4 роки тому

    Very helpful thanks

  • @neerujat1978
    @neerujat1978 4 роки тому

    Thank you very much sir

  • @heramb575
    @heramb575 4 роки тому +1

    Sir can u provide a proof for writing kinetic energy in COM frame as K_com+K_reduced mass

  • @alphaiitd1
    @alphaiitd1 2 роки тому

    Thanks sir

  • @shivanayudu5715
    @shivanayudu5715 3 роки тому

    thank you sir

  • @domgesh392
    @domgesh392 4 роки тому

    Sir laws of motion also plzzz

  • @Prashant-fh6px
    @Prashant-fh6px 4 роки тому

    Loved it

  • @Prashant-fh6px
    @Prashant-fh6px 4 роки тому

    COM is love ❤ now 😋

  • @hitarthvachhani2483
    @hitarthvachhani2483 Рік тому

    very low volume!

  • @neerajkumarshaw1019
    @neerajkumarshaw1019 4 роки тому

    Sir q no. 1.267 🙏🙏

  • @aryansudan2239
    @aryansudan2239 3 роки тому

    revised

  • @man_united-z1h
    @man_united-z1h 3 роки тому +1

    Solution quality is soooo good and audio quality is soooo bad 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @PhysicswithAkashGoyal
      @PhysicswithAkashGoyal  3 роки тому +2

      Balancing Act 😂.
      I am thinking to re upload these videos having sound issues ☺️

    • @wdivyankop
      @wdivyankop 3 місяці тому

      @@PhysicswithAkashGoyal koi nahi sir..... your doing very nice job thore se earphones to ham le hi skte hain......

  • @brocklesner2457
    @brocklesner2457 4 роки тому +1

    Very low voice.

  • @Tracks777
    @Tracks777 4 роки тому +6

    amazing stuff