So I’m trying to understand the rules running wide zone to the weak side. The combos don’t seem to follow regular covered/uncovered rules. How come a C and PSG are combo on a 1 tech? The 1 tech is backside of the PSG. Wouldn’t the PSG be in combo with the PST towards the 5 or 9 tech? This would break the rules of the wide zone scheme that I was taught. I could see maybe a solo call for the PST to solo the DE and maybe the PSG give the C a hand as the PSG moved directly up to the LB but not combo the 1 tech with him. I’m just looking for some clarification. Thank You.
It’s all predicated on what the combo calls are. Example if the guard is not out leveraged by the linebacker there is no reason for him to chase to the DE. If the linebacker. Out leverages the combo then the guard has to make the combo with the tackle.
@@Coachcodutti1 okay I didn’t even considered this. I was assuming it had something to do with the alignment of the 1 tech (whether he was playing more of a 2i or shading more towards a 0). I didn’t consider that this was based on the alignment of the LBer. Thank you for the response. Is there a system that you use to determine which LBer will be for which combo? It sounded like you determine which LBer was the furthest combo play side and counted your way back… is this something that your lineman do to determine which LBer is in their combo?
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Do you think the widezone concept can be taught to 2nd-3rd graders???
Great videos.
So I’m trying to understand the rules running wide zone to the weak side. The combos don’t seem to follow regular covered/uncovered rules. How come a C and PSG are combo on a 1 tech? The 1 tech is backside of the PSG. Wouldn’t the PSG be in combo with the PST towards the 5 or 9 tech? This would break the rules of the wide zone scheme that I was taught. I could see maybe a solo call for the PST to solo the DE and maybe the PSG give the C a hand as the PSG moved directly up to the LB but not combo the 1 tech with him. I’m just looking for some clarification. Thank You.
It’s all predicated on what the combo calls are. Example if the guard is not out leveraged by the linebacker there is no reason for him to chase to the DE.
If the linebacker. Out leverages the combo then the guard has to make the combo with the tackle.
@@Coachcodutti1 okay I didn’t even considered this. I was assuming it had something to do with the alignment of the 1 tech (whether he was playing more of a 2i or shading more towards a 0). I didn’t consider that this was based on the alignment of the LBer. Thank you for the response. Is there a system that you use to determine which LBer will be for which combo? It sounded like you determine which LBer was the furthest combo play side and counted your way back… is this something that your lineman do to determine which LBer is in their combo?