Long range rocket artillery air defence system ke liye jese s400 or s300 jese defence system ki missile ko vested Kiya ja sakta he or sir china ki long range artillery indian air defence ke liye Kitna danger he or india ko china ki long range artillery ko counter karne ke liye kaya karna chahiye .
Bhai pls reply dena ek question h Is it possible to make u-boat carrier submarine Just like aircraft carrier I mean a submarine with U-boats where U-boats can do tasks (like destroying enemies ship etc) and coming back to submarine Just like aircraft doing its operation and coming back to aircraft carrier
Hey man. Big fan and long time subscriber. You should have mentioned the prices too my man. It would have opened up the bigger picture here. Though it would make India look almost foolish by going for the French Barracuda Class given the Price and the Huge parameter we have to cover in the Indian Ocean. But currently our country is Obsessed with France and I'm pretty sure that they'll go for the French.
I have a question. Why do we need Partners to make our own SSN? Because we already made our own SSBN which is more complex in making then SSN. SSN would be smaller or equal to Indian SSBNs also We already made Marine Nuclear Reactor for our SSBN so we do not have problems in nuclear Reactors for SSN. We can add Small VLS tubes in our SSN for Brahmos and nirbhay. So why aren't we taking the experience of Arihant class submarine to make our own SSN?
@@Shivam-kz2dg US have built there submarines to hunt other submarines, while Russians built submarines which are meant to hunt a task force. That's why missiles are important in Russian submarines.
@@AnIndianPatriot For India , hunting down / Stopping Chinese task force / Aircraft Fleet is the main requirement. Because we cannot and will not ever be able to gain Numerical advantage in terms of Battle Ships or Aircraft carriers . Hence The Russian Sub makes most sense for India. But given the Current love of Indian Government for France . I think we'll go for the French Option.
Since the Russsians and French subs are main contenders , Can you make a detailed analysis of both Russian Yasen class and Barracuda class submarines. Also a detailed analysis of Chinese SSNs.
The Russian Sub is a powerhouse, with 10 torpedo tubes and really important Vertical Launching Systems. Where as The French sub is almost half the displacement had the torpedo tubes and No Vertical Launching Systems. Indpite of all this the Russian Sub will only cost around 25% more than the French sub. But Seeing the current government and it's love for France. .. I'm sure India will select the French Option.
@@RohitRaj_0911 dude, French Barracuda class is the smallest nuclear SSN ever in existence, thus it is also one of the stealthiest sub ever made. It generates so little acoustic signature that it can be at a very short distance at a time but no one will be able to catch it. Remember how one small Swedish sub managed to take down an entire US carrier strike group. French Barracuda may not have any VLS tubes but that allows it to be this small and stealthy. You can call it the F22 of SSN. Though Americans will call the seawolf class as the F22. On the other hand, Russian Yasen M class subs( the newly launched Kazan M) are called missile carriers. They are actually built in that way only to be as devastating as possible. In that way they create a great deal of fear in its enemy's mind. Yasen class are kind of a mixed bag between SSN and SSBN, much like Russian SU34 fighter bomber. Maybe I'm just over imagining things but it certainly looks like it. Over-all the reason India is a bit biased on France because of its mastery in LUE(low Uranium enriched) neuclear reactor tech, or 9th generation nuclear reactor tech, which India wants to acquire from France. Certainly they won't give that on a platter, but they can surely help in some key areas in order to reduce the development time. India's quest is also making a SSN with VLS tubes, fitted with submarine launched Brahmos anti-ship missiles.
The six pack SSN's are absolutely essential for one each for Malacca, Sunda, Lombok and Sri Lanka straits. The remaining 3 should be deployed in the Arabian Sea and Red Sea straits.
Everything is important but our budget constraints and timeline is not allowing for aircraft carrier. All have their importance qualitatively and quantitatively.
Navy has finally understood the meaning of Gen had said Indian Navy needs submarines and they have to SSN and so have shelved the third Carrier, thanks.
India should go ahead with France only. Quickly order 4 more Scorpene class, which will take roughly 5 years. In those 5 years finalize the design of the SSN . Then start manufacturing using the same plant & trained manpower.
Iran military industry ka video dek kr wonder hota hai..ki is technically isolated country ne armed UAV with ATA missiles, cruise missile,guns,UGV..sb sector me weapons bna hi liye..chaahe morden standard ke na ho pr ek base to bna hi liye.. India rustum dron 10 saal se test kr rha..assault rifle tk import krna pd rha
www.forbes.com Web results Clone Wars: Why Iran Will Copy Captured US Global Hawk Drone see this they copy everything from outside. While we are designing indeginously. However you are correct in terms of importing guns.we should make our own gun industry with some good guns..so that we don't have to make them in future.
Ek hum hai Hume submarine, aircraft carrier, transport aircraft, fighter aircraft tank sab kuch chahiye Dusra paxtan hai jo sare kam JF-17 lunder se hi kar leta hai Sasta ladaka tayara 😅😅😂😂 world best
It was informative to see the big list of nuclear attack submarines from USA, Russia, France, UK and china, unfortunately uptill now apart from Russia no other nation among that list had been willing to co-operate with us to develop our nuclear propulsion/nuclear technology for military purpose.
Why would they cooperate?? Why cant our scientists make those things?? Why should anybody give their inventions just for some money?? Now its time we invent those weapons without anyone's help
@@anuparnoacharya5779 yep, you are right and you have asked the right question "why would they co-operate, why can't we develop our own technology" in 1980's when we were searching for know-how to build "nuclear propulsion" we did get assistance from Soviet Union and later from Russia in the 90's and also Soviet Union/Russia provided us with nuclear attack submarines on lease in the form of chakra1/chakra-2/chakra-3 enabling Indians the experience in operating nuclear attack submarines. As far as western countries are concerned France and Germany have co-operated with us to build conventional submarines but have no known history of co-operating with India in nuclear propulsion technology or nuclear technology for military purpose.
I think India will have to face two issues that India's adversary has. #1 Quantity and #2 HighTech. China already is on the path to increase its quantity, the Tech they have may not be impressive now, but they are working Hard and Fast. So I think, it would be better if India can accommodate more weapons carrying to stay longer in battle and engage more opponent assets.
Great insight. India can partner with France for building 7 SSN but also lease min 2 Russian nuclear subs. This is a big submarine with vertical launch. Operating two different technologies/build will add to our know how & in future make us atma nirbhar. India should paralelly focus on nuclear engineers, doctors, legal experts, scientists, disaster management experts from now for future nuclear self sufficiency. As we are going to increase nuclear power generation, fuel defence, attack capabilities.
Naval group has a very poor record regarding its delayed work with Australian navy and even with Indian navy. So considering the time factor Russia and UK are more significant partners.
Adding a Aircraft carrier do not really make sense for us until we beef up subs and frigates. With 2 carriers we can cover Arabian Sea ... for Indian Ocean ... andaman Nicobar acts as our 3rd carrier which can contain or block the straight with subs and frigates .. obviously more is good but for the cost of 1 aircraft carrier can supplement 6 ssn or more ships ...
Jo bhi Karna hai jaldi karo (GOI). Decision making fast karo thodi. Neend se jaago. Already it will take a decade to make these sea monsters. China already has an edge over us. Finalise Barracuda class and make PPP of L&T and Mazgaon Dock Limited. And ask both of them to work together and cohesively on strict timelines. Jai hind.
@@walkingcorpse2392 congress aa gayi toh 10 years to kya kabhi submarine nehi baney nehi degi . Un bewafakoff ki wazah sey india ney 20 year tak ek bhi submarine baney ka order nehi diya.
India nuclear submarine leaser wepans operates under water pressure power generate to supply nuclear submarine lesar weapons I think different technology
India should get barracuda but increase number to 9 or 10. And the missile area should be geometrically modified for bigger missiles but less no. of bigger missiles and hence submarines count should be 9 or 10. Of course Indian missiles should be involved.
Whatever happened to the proposal of these SSNs being based on arihant's design with a more strengthened hull designed my Midhani group and a more powerful pressurised reactor by BARC ? This should be the cue to be followed.
मे कल गुगल मॅप यूज करके साऊथ चायना सी कों देख रहा था... चायना ने वहा पे आईसलँड पर बहुत सारे एअरबेस ऍक्टिव्ह किये हुवे है..मैने तीन एअरबेस देखे.... उन्ह एअरबेस पर आप गुगल मॅप से मिग 29 भी देख सकते हो.... और हमारे एअरफोर्स का एक भी ऍक्टिव्ह एअरबेस अंदमान अँड निकोबार आयलंड पर नहीं है... खाली रनवे बनाये हुवे है..एअरपोर्ट के लिए...
india already have made in india nuclear powered arihant class submarine.....2built complete....which one in india navy and one in sea trail ....2 under construction
I would suggest Govt. & Navy to go for the Barracuda design from France. 6 SSN + 6 SSK of same design possibly= 12 Subs hence there is a chance that France might offer us full TOT after this. The weight should be possibly more than 6500 tonnes. I would also suggest Government & Navy to procure 3 Additional Scorpene Submarines if possible for Short Term future, just incase, if P 75I, similar to P 75 deal takes time to get signed. For the next 6-7 years Navy should mainly focus on Submarines, Destroyers & Minesweepers in big money projects. 3rd Carrier can be the focus after 2027-28. For now, it's important to increase our underwater force by 2030 to counter the PLAN in the IOR. Our timeline should be this- 1. 6 SSN Approval & MOU signed with France for Barracuda Class- 2022 March along with deal for lease of 1 A 330 Class Refueller. (INDUCTION of 1st SSN- 2032-33, all to be inducted by 2038-39) 2. 2022 September- 3 Additional Scorpene Class. During similar time we can sign 36 Additional Rafale F4 & Lease of 5 Additional Refuellers as well. (First Sub to be inducted in 2025 with remaining in 2026 & 2027 respectively.) (Same timeline as the second batch of 36 Rafales) We can tell France that instead of procuring AS 365 Pather for 111 NUH deal, since we already have ALH Naval Dhruv ready now, we will go for lease of 5 Refuellers in it's place (later we can purchase them after the lease ends). 3. 2023 December-2024 March- 6 P 75I Subs deal (Based on Barracuda Class design or can be SMX 3.0) First Submarine to be inducted in 2029-30. All to be delivered by 2034. 4. 2025 March- Construction of 6 Indigenous Conventional Submarine (SSK) begins. (FIRST DIVE SCHEDULED FOR 2030-31 FOLLOWED BY INDUCTION IN 2033. ALL TO BE INDUCTED BY 2037-38.) If we do this then by 2040 we will have around 35 Submarines in our fleet which is sufficient to control the IOR & tackle 2 Chinese Carriers. We'll have- A. SSK (21)- 1. 6+3 Scorpene 2. 6 P 75I (Barracuda or SMX 3.0) 3. 6 Indigenous SSK B. SSN + SSBN (13) 1. 6 Indigenous SSN 2. 4 Arihant Class SSBN 3. 3 S5 Class SSBN
Very nice and informative video. I was about to write about Virginia and Astute class were SSNs and not SSKs, then I saw your comments. Your videos as usual, are well studied and full of information. Indian SSN will be indigenous design. Designing work already started in naval design bureau. It will be combination of eastern and western technology. French naval group would be consultant in designing critical parts. Barracuda has a low enriched uranium, nuclear power reactor. Thanx for information.
It is highly likely that India might opt to develop SSNs and SSKs based on barracuda submarines since the French have designed the base model in such a way.
I also much like you believe we are more inclined to go with a French design rather than US or UK or perhaps even Russian. But what creates na little doubt in my mind is that our SSN crews have been trained on the Akula class ships. Would that make us lean towards the Russian design eventually?
6 new ssn (6000 ton) + 4 ( arihant class ssbn converted to ssn) = 10 ssn (total) ... 13500 -14000 ton 5 ssbn ( 2x16 k5 -5000 km range + 3x12/14 k6 - 7500 km range) .... Chinese game over !!!
We need vertical launch system with heavy weights for feature warfare in other regions like south taiwan sea in such case USA OR RUSSIA submarine is best solutions
@@Aman1love no he's Not a joker Whole of Pakistan Is a Joke,With national occupation being begging,Headed by Great Katora khan Follower of Xi Kingpin and Main operator of worlds most advanced Fighter The great 10gen intergalactic spaceship jadded tarin atmi mulk wala junk fighter 17
We need to counter ship to ship, jet to jet and soldier to soldier with China and Pak combined....This needs to be on continues evolution. We need to also order few from other supporting countries...Japan lost 4 aircraft carriers in a space or 15 minutes during WWII...So we cannot rely on 1-2 Subs and assume that it will work for us...
According to Wikipedia, the Barracuda class submarine has only twenty racks for torpedoes and missiles, but none of the missiles are supersonic, let alone hypersonic. And they lacks in range too. It doesn't have vertical launching system for missiles either. Why should India buy so many submarines which cannot carry enough suitable weapons ?! 🤔
Chinese strategy on India succeeded fabulously thanks mainly to Congress party who played along their Communist Masters to the point that as of 2021 we stand naked and totally exposed. While China succeeded in tying Bharat down North (Land borders of North) all the While China was aiming for Down South ( Indian Ocean Region). As a result we invested heavily on Land Forces to stop attacks on our Northern Land Borders While China expanded its Navy to successfully block 🚫 Bharat down south in the Bay of Bengal, Indian Ocean & The Arabian Sea. Making a robust Navy is a very herculean task and takes huge timelines to fructify. Surface combatants for sea control and Sub surface platforms for sea denial together in adequate numbers are a strong deterrent. I pray my Bharat finds a strong enough stop gap to deny PLAN the pleasure it seeks. God Speed to our Defense Forces. Bharat Mata ki Jai.
@@shorts-term473 By changing with more power nuclear core reactors for greater speed,change of VLS tubes which will be able to fire Cruise Missiles as VLS in SSBN are larger.
France has already given offer to manufacture Berkuda class submarines in India. Why this offer is accepted and to start work at earliest. In this will also get SSN technology transfer for future.
Indian government will take at least 5yrs. In taking decisions about SSN.and ater that it will take 40yrs in induction. In this way Indian Nevy will remain at backfoot in this naval Platform.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arihant-class_submarine .........india already have nuclear powered arihant class submarine.....there are 6 country which are capable to built nuclear powered submarine.....if you dont trust me check the link
@DAD OF ATANK-ISTAN *_When i told you, it's impossible🤔🤔 read my comment carefully, the truth is that we are lacking in submarine flite, we should have at least 30 SSK, 20 SSBN, 15 SSN in our submarine flite_*
LHD LPD bahut jaruri hai india ke liye aksr news ne aata hai.. warships ko bheja jara hai.. dejaster relief, citizens evacuation, oxygen supply ke liye, medical ke liye... Warships us kaam ke liye to nahi hai..
I always had have a question in my mind that how Russia manages to be a military superpower even now, it's economy Is smaller than India their defense budget is lesser than India (this means lesser money to procure arms etc.) I understand that they innovate their own stuff, but innovation isn't enough, u need money to produce it, so how come Russia operates such new gen planes, submarines etc. That too in large numbers, where is India lacking?
Correction: Virginia class and Astute class are SSN and mistakenly written SSK in description.
Long range rocket artillery air defence system ke liye jese s400 or s300 jese defence system ki missile ko vested Kiya ja sakta he or sir china ki long range artillery indian air defence ke liye Kitna danger he or india ko china ki long range artillery ko counter karne ke liye kaya karna chahiye .
Bhai pls reply dena ek question h
Is it possible to make u-boat carrier submarine
Just like aircraft carrier
I mean a submarine with U-boats where U-boats can do tasks (like destroying enemies ship etc) and coming back to submarine
Just like aircraft doing its operation and coming back to aircraft carrier
Hey man. Big fan and long time subscriber.
You should have mentioned the prices too my man. It would have opened up the bigger picture here. Though it would make India look almost foolish by going for the French Barracuda Class given the Price and the Huge parameter we have to cover in the Indian Ocean.
But currently our country is Obsessed with France and I'm pretty sure that they'll go for the French.
I have a question. Why do we need Partners to make our own SSN? Because we already made our own SSBN which is more complex in making then SSN. SSN would be smaller or equal to Indian SSBNs also We already made Marine Nuclear Reactor for our SSBN so we do not have problems in nuclear Reactors for SSN. We can add Small VLS tubes in our SSN for Brahmos and nirbhay. So why aren't we taking the experience of Arihant class submarine to make our own SSN?
where is the end bckground music sourced from?
Navy needs to get the attention it deserves.
❤❤❤
Congratulations for your new website Bro.
Respect from all DM members.
25 dislikes- Chinese and chote chinese(Pak)🤣🤣🤣
The Russian sub is a powerhouse. God damn it's impressive AF
Their obsession with missiles😓😓😓
@@Shivam-kz2dg US have built there submarines to hunt other submarines, while Russians built submarines which are meant to hunt a task force. That's why missiles are important in Russian submarines.
Typhoon Class Is Thick 😂
@@AnIndianPatriot For India , hunting down / Stopping Chinese task force / Aircraft Fleet is the main requirement. Because we cannot and will not ever be able to gain Numerical advantage in terms of Battle Ships or Aircraft carriers . Hence The Russian Sub makes most sense for India. But given the Current love of Indian Government for France . I think we'll go for the French Option.
@@reticent- 😂
Since the Russsians and French subs are main contenders , Can you make a detailed analysis of both Russian Yasen class and Barracuda class submarines. Also a detailed analysis of Chinese SSNs.
The video should be done
Yes I suppprt Ravi teja’s request to make detailed video on Russian and French subs being main contenders.
The Russian Sub is a powerhouse, with 10 torpedo tubes and really important Vertical Launching Systems. Where as The French sub is almost half the displacement had the torpedo tubes and No Vertical Launching Systems. Indpite of all this the Russian Sub will only cost around 25% more than the French sub. But Seeing the current government and it's love for France. .. I'm sure India will select the French Option.
Both are in a different weight class.
@@RohitRaj_0911 dude, French Barracuda class is the smallest nuclear SSN ever in existence, thus it is also one of the stealthiest sub ever made. It generates so little acoustic signature that it can be at a very short distance at a time but no one will be able to catch it. Remember how one small Swedish sub managed to take down an entire US carrier strike group. French Barracuda may not have any VLS tubes but that allows it to be this small and stealthy. You can call it the F22 of SSN. Though Americans will call the seawolf class as the F22.
On the other hand, Russian Yasen M class subs( the newly launched Kazan M) are called missile carriers. They are actually built in that way only to be as devastating as possible. In that way they create a great deal of fear in its enemy's mind. Yasen class are kind of a mixed bag between SSN and SSBN, much like Russian SU34 fighter bomber. Maybe I'm just over imagining things but it certainly looks like it.
Over-all the reason India is a bit biased on France because of its mastery in LUE(low Uranium enriched) neuclear reactor tech, or 9th generation nuclear reactor tech, which India wants to acquire from France. Certainly they won't give that on a platter, but they can surely help in some key areas in order to reduce the development time. India's quest is also making a SSN with VLS tubes, fitted with submarine launched Brahmos anti-ship missiles.
The six pack SSN's are absolutely essential for one each for Malacca, Sunda, Lombok and Sri Lanka straits. The remaining 3 should be deployed in the Arabian Sea and Red Sea straits.
6 SSNs usually means 3 in active patrol, while the other 3 are in maintenance...
I have always thought that navy should go for sub, destroyers, frigets and corvettes instead of aircraft carrier.
Everything is important but our budget constraints and timeline is not allowing for aircraft carrier. All have their importance qualitatively and quantitatively.
I agree. Those combatant ships are more important. But an aircraft carrier is mostly just for power projection.
The only time I've seen Astute class in action was in the series "The last ship" and it was the most feared threat to the lead ship.
Navy has finally understood the meaning of Gen had said Indian Navy needs submarines and they have to SSN and so have shelved the third Carrier, thanks.
India should go ahead with France only. Quickly order 4 more Scorpene class, which will take roughly 5 years. In those 5 years finalize the design of the SSN . Then start manufacturing using the same plant & trained manpower.
Iran military industry ka video dek kr wonder hota hai..ki is technically isolated country ne armed UAV with ATA missiles, cruise missile,guns,UGV..sb sector me weapons bna hi liye..chaahe morden standard ke na ho pr ek base to bna hi liye..
India rustum dron 10 saal se test kr rha..assault rifle tk import krna pd rha
Are unhone
USA ke drones ko copy karke banaya
Unke paas aur koi chara nahi tha
@@human3213 ua-cam.com/video/YgqdfaEMHqo/v-deo.html
Itna kaam to india bhi jodtod kr skta hai..
www.forbes.com
Web results
Clone Wars: Why Iran Will Copy Captured US Global Hawk Drone see this they copy everything from outside. While we are designing indeginously. However you are correct in terms of importing guns.we should make our own gun industry with some good guns..so that we don't have to make them in future.
Morning upload? Cool.
Ek hum hai Hume submarine, aircraft carrier, transport aircraft, fighter aircraft tank sab kuch chahiye
Dusra paxtan hai jo sare kam JF-17 lunder se hi kar leta hai
Sasta ladaka tayara 😅😅😂😂 world best
Are bhai Pakistan se compare mt kiya kro.... We are catching up with china Aur present aur future mai Wo he Hmara sabse bda enemy Rehne wala hai
@@Amishshrivastava3229
Bat to apki sahi hai bhai,
Par in sale bhikhariyo ko time time par inki aokat yad dilana bhi jarruri hai
@@UnknownGunman10 😂😂
It was informative to see the big list of nuclear attack submarines from USA, Russia, France, UK and china, unfortunately uptill now apart from Russia no other nation among that list had been willing to co-operate with us to develop our nuclear propulsion/nuclear technology for military purpose.
Why would they cooperate?? Why cant our scientists make those things?? Why should anybody give their inventions just for some money?? Now its time we invent those weapons without anyone's help
@@anuparnoacharya5779 yep, you are right and you have asked the right question "why would they co-operate, why can't we develop our own technology" in 1980's when we were searching for know-how to build "nuclear propulsion" we did get assistance from Soviet Union and later from Russia in the 90's and also Soviet Union/Russia provided us with nuclear attack submarines on lease in the form of chakra1/chakra-2/chakra-3 enabling Indians the experience in operating nuclear attack submarines.
As far as western countries are concerned France and Germany have co-operated with us to build conventional submarines but have no known history of co-operating with India in nuclear propulsion technology or nuclear technology for military purpose.
we want 12 SSNs 12 SSBNs 24 conventional subs 5 aircraft carriers 20 destroyers 50+ frigates/corvettes
Bhai Why am i getting notifications to your videos 2Days later,Yet i daily check so that i can watch your videos as quickly as i can
TYPHOON CLASS SUBMARINE k upar ek video. Please !!!!
I think India will have to face two issues that India's adversary has.
#1 Quantity and #2 HighTech. China already is on the path to increase its quantity, the Tech they have may not be impressive now, but they are working Hard and Fast.
So I think, it would be better if India can accommodate more weapons carrying to stay longer in battle and engage more opponent assets.
Virginia class SSN at 7:31
Thanks.
First time we got the govt who gives full permission to our armed forces to retaliate...🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳Jai Hind 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Kannadiga?
K5 with mirv technology is needed
India Should Go All Alone...
No Need to Invest Our Billions of Dollars in Foreign Countries.....
Navies of Neighbouring countries to Indian Navy : Vhaa Bhaiya full Nuclear baaji 🐶
India:tu bhi chala lena bad me
Bhai P75 A Jo indigenous ssn class h kya isse ye alag project hai
It would be best to go with Russia for subs and US for aircraft carriers.
Great insight. India can partner with France for building 7 SSN but also lease min 2 Russian nuclear subs. This is a big submarine with vertical launch. Operating two different technologies/build will add to our know how & in future make us atma nirbhar. India should paralelly focus on nuclear engineers, doctors, legal experts, scientists, disaster management experts from now for future nuclear self sufficiency. As we are going to increase nuclear power generation, fuel defence, attack capabilities.
The website looks very professional 👌, good job.
Nice job
You deserve million subscriber
Hope you will achive soon
0:34 Face revel of DEFENCE MATRIX is finally there😘😘😘😅😅😅
We need to be completely navy focused nation then we are currently , the *majority* of the world trade happens through the sea .
Naval group has a very poor record regarding its delayed work with Australian navy and even with Indian navy. So considering the time factor Russia and UK are more significant partners.
Collaboration with DCNS will overrun the project cost like in Australian Navy case
Adding a Aircraft carrier do not really make sense for us until we beef up subs and frigates. With 2 carriers we can cover Arabian Sea ... for Indian Ocean ... andaman Nicobar acts as our 3rd carrier which can contain or block the straight with subs and frigates .. obviously more is good but for the cost of 1 aircraft carrier can supplement 6 ssn or more ships ...
Jo bhi Karna hai jaldi karo (GOI). Decision making fast karo thodi. Neend se jaago. Already it will take a decade to make these sea monsters. China already has an edge over us. Finalise Barracuda class and make PPP of L&T and Mazgaon Dock Limited. And ask both of them to work together and cohesively on strict timelines. Jai hind.
Bhai bechain mat ho congress aane ka wait kar !!
@@walkingcorpse2392 Congress? Hahaha
@@Argdut1106 aae gi bhai wait kar
@@walkingcorpse2392 congress aa gayi toh 10 years to kya kabhi submarine nehi baney nehi degi . Un bewafakoff ki wazah sey india ney 20 year tak ek bhi submarine baney ka order nehi diya.
We must have a long term and short term plan to mitigate our deficiency.
Sir Franchisee ssn ka full explanation video plz
We have to choose both FRANCE AND RUSSIA parallely to increase number as well as dependency of of single side .......atleast 6- 6 to counter china
India nuclear submarine leaser wepans operates under water pressure power generate to supply nuclear submarine lesar weapons I think different technology
DM bhai aapke khyal se bhaa ko kiski jyada zaroorat hai?ssn/ssbn
100 k soonnnnnnnnnnnn
India should get barracuda but increase number to 9 or 10. And the missile area should be geometrically modified for bigger missiles but less no. of bigger missiles and hence submarines count should be 9 or 10. Of course Indian missiles should be involved.
We must jointly produce with dependable partner and organization is a priority keeping in mind our requirement.
france has shown there warmth to india in recent events . in UN in Covid in Rafael in everything . they should be our new defense partners .
Whatever happened to the proposal of these SSNs being based on arihant's design with a more strengthened hull designed my Midhani group and a more powerful pressurised reactor by BARC ? This should be the cue to be followed.
Indian navi ko chois achhi hai
मे कल गुगल मॅप यूज करके साऊथ चायना सी कों देख रहा था... चायना ने वहा पे आईसलँड पर बहुत सारे एअरबेस ऍक्टिव्ह किये हुवे है..मैने तीन एअरबेस देखे.... उन्ह एअरबेस पर आप गुगल मॅप से मिग 29 भी देख सकते हो.... और हमारे एअरफोर्स का एक भी ऍक्टिव्ह एअरबेस अंदमान अँड निकोबार आयलंड पर नहीं है... खाली रनवे बनाये हुवे है..एअरपोर्ट के लिए...
india already have made in india nuclear powered arihant class submarine.....2built complete....which one in india navy and one in sea trail ....2 under construction
I would suggest Govt. & Navy to go for the Barracuda design from France. 6 SSN + 6 SSK of same design possibly= 12 Subs hence there is a chance that France might offer us full TOT after this. The weight should be possibly more than 6500 tonnes.
I would also suggest Government & Navy to procure 3 Additional Scorpene Submarines if possible for Short Term future, just incase, if P 75I, similar to P 75 deal takes time to get signed.
For the next 6-7 years Navy should mainly focus on Submarines, Destroyers & Minesweepers in big money projects.
3rd Carrier can be the focus after 2027-28. For now, it's important to increase our underwater force by 2030 to counter the PLAN in the IOR.
Our timeline should be this-
1. 6 SSN Approval & MOU signed with France for Barracuda Class- 2022 March along with deal for lease of 1 A 330 Class Refueller. (INDUCTION of 1st SSN- 2032-33, all to be inducted by 2038-39)
2. 2022 September- 3 Additional Scorpene Class. During similar time we can sign 36 Additional Rafale F4 & Lease of 5 Additional Refuellers as well. (First Sub to be inducted in 2025 with remaining in 2026 & 2027 respectively.) (Same timeline as the second batch of 36 Rafales)
We can tell France that instead of procuring AS 365 Pather for 111 NUH deal, since we already have ALH Naval Dhruv ready now, we will go for lease of 5 Refuellers in it's place (later we can purchase them after the lease ends).
3. 2023 December-2024 March- 6 P 75I Subs deal (Based on Barracuda Class design or can be SMX 3.0) First Submarine to be inducted in 2029-30. All to be delivered by 2034.
4. 2025 March- Construction of 6 Indigenous Conventional Submarine (SSK) begins. (FIRST DIVE SCHEDULED FOR 2030-31 FOLLOWED BY INDUCTION IN 2033. ALL TO BE INDUCTED BY 2037-38.)
If we do this then by 2040 we will have around 35 Submarines in our fleet which is sufficient to control the IOR & tackle 2 Chinese Carriers. We'll have-
A. SSK (21)-
1. 6+3 Scorpene
2. 6 P 75I (Barracuda or SMX 3.0)
3. 6 Indigenous SSK
B. SSN + SSBN (13)
1. 6 Indigenous SSN
2. 4 Arihant Class SSBN
3. 3 S5 Class SSBN
What about Yasin class is india purchasing this class there were talks about this
we should rather consider russian option as we can use indegeneous platforms from it and it is massive so it would have more impact
Very nice and informative video. I was about to write about Virginia and Astute class were SSNs and not SSKs, then I saw your comments. Your videos as usual, are well studied and full of information. Indian SSN will be indigenous design. Designing work already started in naval design bureau. It will be combination of eastern and western technology. French naval group would be consultant in designing critical parts. Barracuda has a low enriched uranium, nuclear power reactor. Thanx for information.
10 SSN ke jarurat hai Indian ⚓ Navy ko
Tuje kisne bataya 😑
It is highly likely that India might opt to develop SSNs and SSKs based on barracuda submarines since the French have designed the base model in such a way.
In future nuclear submarines are the major requirements for india as china is also increasing its nuclear submarine fleet.
bro what about arihant class I do know they are ssbn nuclear subs are they not
Good morning bro and thank you for your complete information about snn 🙏
I also much like you believe we are more inclined to go with a French design rather than US or UK or perhaps even Russian. But what creates na little doubt in my mind is that our SSN crews have been trained on the Akula class ships. Would that make us lean towards the Russian design eventually?
New look of your vedio is cazy.😍
Jai Hind 🇮🇳🇮🇳
6 new ssn (6000 ton) + 4 ( arihant class ssbn converted to ssn) = 10 ssn (total) ... 13500 -14000 ton 5 ssbn ( 2x16 k5 -5000 km range + 3x12/14 k6 - 7500 km range) .... Chinese game over !!!
We need vertical launch system with heavy weights for feature warfare in other regions like south taiwan sea in such case USA OR RUSSIA submarine is best solutions
Jai Hind.
My Junk fighter 17 is better than any submarine😁
You are just a joker
@@Aman1love no he's Not a joker
Whole of Pakistan Is a Joke,With national occupation being begging,Headed by Great Katora khan Follower of Xi Kingpin and Main operator of worlds most advanced Fighter The great 10gen intergalactic spaceship jadded tarin atmi mulk wala junk fighter 17
We need to counter ship to ship, jet to jet and soldier to soldier with China and Pak combined....This needs to be on continues evolution. We need to also order few from other supporting countries...Japan lost 4 aircraft carriers in a space or 15 minutes during WWII...So we cannot rely on 1-2 Subs and assume that it will work for us...
According to Wikipedia, the Barracuda class submarine has only twenty racks for torpedoes and missiles, but none of the missiles are supersonic, let alone hypersonic. And they lacks in range too. It doesn't have vertical launching system for missiles either.
Why should India buy so many submarines which cannot carry enough suitable weapons ?! 🤔
We are late
We should have taken this decision 10 years ago
First with 9 others
Jai hind🇮🇳🇮🇳👍🏻
Jai HIND
I already started following your web page
Chinese strategy on India succeeded fabulously thanks mainly to Congress party who played along their Communist Masters to the point that as of 2021 we stand naked and totally exposed.
While China succeeded in tying Bharat down North (Land borders of North) all the While China was aiming for Down South ( Indian Ocean Region). As a result we invested heavily on Land Forces to stop attacks on our Northern Land Borders While China expanded its Navy to successfully block 🚫 Bharat down south in the Bay of Bengal, Indian Ocean & The Arabian Sea.
Making a robust Navy is a very herculean task and takes huge timelines to fructify. Surface combatants for sea control and Sub surface platforms for sea denial together in adequate numbers are a strong deterrent. I pray my Bharat finds a strong enough stop gap to deny PLAN the pleasure it seeks.
God Speed to our Defense Forces.
Bharat Mata ki Jai.
Can you make a video about Gotland class submarine? It's a very good diesel sub.
Sir please make a video on comparison of tejas mk 2 and J 10 c
I would like to have an nuke attack sub based on INS arihant
Bhai Arihant is SSBN . Ballistic missile carrying sub. It's role is different and designed to serve a different purpose.
How can a ssbn be changed to a ssn🙄🙄🙄
@@shorts-term473 By changing with more power nuclear core reactors for greater speed,change of VLS tubes which will be able to fire Cruise Missiles as VLS in SSBN are larger.
Arighat is bigger
India should make its nuclear submarine comfortable for its sailors
Jai hind🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Sir web site to bhot mast banayi ha ap na
Partnership with France(NATO country) makes most sense. It can share intelligence with MH60R and P8i without restrictions.
Sir please make a video on latest Russian Belgorod class submarine
Please make a special video on barakuda class nuclear attack submarine
Why navy chief all of a sudden asking for submarines. They used to give press conferences asking for $ 10bn aircraft carrier.
French technology in submarine not fully matured.
I think India should opt Russia and also approch UK for submarine,to have good deal with Russia.
Website mast hai
Please make a detailed analysis about our nuclear strategy.
What about borie A class submarine ?
JAI HIND
France has already given offer to manufacture Berkuda class submarines in India. Why this offer is accepted and to start work at earliest. In this will also get SSN technology transfer for future.
Jai hind 🙏🙏🙏
Nice info..
Indian government will take at least 5yrs. In taking decisions about SSN.and ater that it will take 40yrs in induction. In this way Indian Nevy will remain at backfoot in this naval Platform.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arihant-class_submarine .........india already have nuclear powered arihant class submarine.....there are 6 country which are capable to built nuclear powered submarine.....if you dont trust me check the link
I think India need.....10 nuclear power attack submarines and 10 ballistic missile submarines......
Sir will present day aircraft carriers will replaced by submarine aircraft carriers?
What will these Toys do when the Enemy Uses an Invisible Weapon
7:29 bhai Russian Yasen class se kam nhi 100 tonne zyada displacement hai.
Nope, that 8,700 ton displacement was submerged, and in Yasen class it's 13,800 ton, 8600 ton is actually surfaced.
Can kalvari be changed into a nuclear sub in the future ??
*_Not Good idea in prospective of Economic beside we need SSK too_*
@@navneetkumarbhaskar618 yeah. But What if changed it with a mini reactor?
Yes possible
@DAD OF ATANK-ISTAN mujhe bhi yhi lagta hai
@DAD OF ATANK-ISTAN *_When i told you, it's impossible🤔🤔 read my comment carefully, the truth is that we are lacking in submarine flite, we should have at least 30 SSK, 20 SSBN, 15 SSN in our submarine flite_*
LHD LPD bahut jaruri hai india ke liye aksr news ne aata hai.. warships ko bheja jara hai.. dejaster relief, citizens evacuation, oxygen supply ke liye, medical ke liye...
Warships us kaam ke liye to nahi hai..
Brother aj ki video submarine pe thi ye LPD LHD Kaha se a Gaya
Why not India give orders for new SSN for 3 different firms for providing 6 new SSN within limited time...
Sir can we make ssbk???
The Block 5 Virginia class submarine can carry 40 tomahawk missile
Even after operating Subs for long and also after building a ssbn indigenously, still aren't we capable of designing a SSK
I always had have a question in my mind that how Russia manages to be a military superpower even now, it's economy Is smaller than India their defense budget is lesser than India (this means lesser money to procure arms etc.) I understand that they innovate their own stuff, but innovation isn't enough, u need money to produce it, so how come Russia operates such new gen planes, submarines etc. That too in large numbers, where is India lacking?
Most of the defence budget money goes to salaries.
Konsa mic use karte ho