Warning/ headsup. Make sure your calculator is in Degree mode/ Deg mode so you can get the correct answer when it comes to arc tan/ tan-1(4/3) to ensure your calculator is set up right, if the answer was a 0.xyz (whatever xyz may be) then you are in the wrong mode. So far from my attempts Deg mode works in all quadrants.
Clearly explained base of Two-dimensional Fourier transform! Greatfull to see simply and direct path how to transforme Cartesian coordintes to Polar coordintes. Before I assume that the function F (x, y) obeys the Dirichlet conditions and the space of the primarly transformed Cartesian coordintes is two-dimensional like original space. Also given Polar coordintes is so good transform by You in circular symmetry where the element of area in the integration can be seen directly or from the Jacobean. We can add it to acknowledging to terms such as "green" and "sustainable" to find the azimuth we select and draw a line from the center of the circle until circle extrmity and measure the angle from the north in a clockwise direction. This is some kind of my idea how to impact Fourier transformation to find sun altitude by sun trajectory and impact of the solar radiation on urban enviroment such as water storage and waveing.
So sir, when we have plotted the Cartesian coordinates then we just simply have to draw a diagonal line from the coordinate towards 0 coordinate to form an angle? And the line is r and the angle is theta?
Let x and y be cartesian coordinates of plane while r and s are poolar coordinates. show that x= rcoss , y= rsins is a C^1 coordinate transformation for r
This is fantastic stuff. The other elephant in the room would be why anyone would use polar over Cartesian? What conditions would give one or the other priority when looking to solve a problem?
when i would want to solve equations involving fields(electric/ magnetic /gravitaional) which are usually radial, polar system would make things easier for me
Here are few playlist: Let me know if that helps. Thanks ua-cam.com/play/PLJ-ma5dJyAqqJlbFcF2eqINDAvKOvTDAe.html ua-cam.com/play/PLJ-ma5dJyAqpAbd-WWlrB1i57kSMnqElQ.html
that handwriting is fire
Wow, it was really easy. And I was worrying too much for nothing. Thank you very much, sir for explaining it in such an easy way.
Thanks. Here is a related Playlist: ua-cam.com/video/q2NHqoybxWw/v-deo.html
Learn and Share
@@MathematicsTutor Thank you again, sir.
It was really helpful sir! And I really like your handwriting :)
Thank you! This was really straightforward and easy to understand, and probably saved my grade haha.
Now I know this that my teachers in school can't teach, thank u so much❤️
yeah it has been great hope it will save me in the upcoming exams
Thanks and All the Best!
thank you Sir, very helpful
Thank you, sir. 😊
.
..
...
Very well explained! Thank You!
Nice sir you are really too good
Thank you
love this guy
Thank u so much i really like ur video
Helpful contet
Clear explanation ✌
Wow sir really amazingly u teach for us.
thanks ❤
Thanks for appreciation
Thank you sir this video so helpfully for me!
Sir You Are Legend ❤️
Great explanation. Thank you!
Hi
@@santoshmhatre2914hi
Best video and make more videos of coordinates geometry
Thanks
Warning/ headsup.
Make sure your calculator is in Degree mode/ Deg mode so you can get the correct answer when it comes to arc tan/ tan-1(4/3) to ensure your calculator is set up right, if the answer was a 0.xyz (whatever xyz may be) then you are in the wrong mode. So far from my attempts Deg mode works in all quadrants.
Thank you!! Very helpful for studying for finals!!
Thank you so much sir!
Thanks man
This was very helpful
Thank u
Love you sir from india❤❤
Very nice sir...
thank you so much. Bless you
Thanks. Here is related playlist: ua-cam.com/video/q2NHqoybxWw/v-deo.html
god bless you man
Thanks. Best Wishes for you and Your Family
Sir, I thank you a lot for your video coming to my search feed I understood it easily without confusion
Thanks sir ❣️❣️❣️
Thank you Sir
Thankyouu 🙏
Clearly explained base of Two-dimensional Fourier transform! Greatfull to see simply and direct path how to transforme Cartesian coordintes to Polar coordintes. Before I assume that the function F (x, y) obeys the Dirichlet conditions and the space of the primarly transformed Cartesian coordintes is two-dimensional like original space. Also given Polar coordintes is so good transform by You in circular symmetry where the element of area in the integration can be seen directly or from the Jacobean. We can add it to acknowledging to terms such as "green" and "sustainable" to find the azimuth we select and draw a line from the center of the circle until circle extrmity and measure the angle from the north in a clockwise direction. This is some kind of my idea how to impact Fourier transformation to find sun altitude by sun trajectory and impact of the solar radiation on urban enviroment such as water storage and waveing.
Thank you sir
Best explanation
Thanks for appreciation.
Here is a related video: ua-cam.com/video/q2NHqoybxWw/v-deo.html
greattttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
Should I have missed my physics lesson to watch this video I'd have had ZERO regrets.
Thank you anil, your hand writing is nice.
Which pen did you use ?
If i would be there
A tight hug will be thrown on you
Receive my blessings
So sir, when we have plotted the Cartesian coordinates then we just simply have to draw a diagonal line from the coordinate towards 0 coordinate to form an angle? And the line is r and the angle is theta?
Let x and y be cartesian coordinates of plane while r and s are poolar coordinates. show that x= rcoss , y= rsins is a C^1 coordinate transformation for r
r>0
This is fantastic stuff. The other elephant in the room would be why anyone would use polar over Cartesian? What conditions would give one or the other priority when looking to solve a problem?
when i would want to solve equations involving fields(electric/ magnetic /gravitaional) which are usually radial, polar system would make things easier for me
And when trying to rotate a point
I'm not sure if you mentioned it, but 3, 4, and 5 is an 30, 60, 90 triangles via Pythagorean.
3, 4, 5 will not form 30-60-90 degree triangle.
@@MathematicsTutor My bad, it is just a relationship of the sides and has nothing to do with the angles.
the video is very helpful but make another video on converting cartesian equation to polar form
Thanks for the suggestion. Will do so. Here is one: ua-cam.com/video/QbR7TGqXjeY/v-deo.html
Here are few playlist: Let me know if that helps. Thanks
ua-cam.com/play/PLJ-ma5dJyAqqJlbFcF2eqINDAvKOvTDAe.html
ua-cam.com/play/PLJ-ma5dJyAqpAbd-WWlrB1i57kSMnqElQ.html
Thankbypubso much. i was dying here a bit ago🥺🥺🥺
Sir what if the point is in second or fourth quadrant???
Good question. Here is a video that can help. ua-cam.com/video/q2NHqoybxWw/v-deo.html
Thanks
Why have you taken inverse of tan?
that’s how you get theta.
How to convert negative number... Plz give me video link sir
Here is a Playlist: ua-cam.com/video/q2NHqoybxWw/v-deo.html
Thanks
In which quadrant this point lie (2, 0, 4)
Give me the link that "explain the jacobian transfer from one coordinate to another coordinate'
have none. Thanks
شكرا طالبة سادس
what if the x is zero?
what
Playlist for more: ua-cam.com/video/q2NHqoybxWw/v-deo.html
What if x is 0 and what if y is 0
The worst explaintion I have ever heard.....
Thank you
Thanks
thank you sir
Thank you sir