That means the timeless zone is the "outer darkness" mentioned in the bible. That's why God said "let there be light" before he made the moon and the sun.
Scary I had a dream a while back (I often rebuke demons in my dreams, this was not one of them but similar) It all happened very fast. I was walking towards an elevator. The door was open, I stepped in, turned around to push the button to go up to the next floor. But I accidentally pushed the button to go down. At the same instant, I realized I was already on the basement floor. Then the doors shut, and the elevator began to plummet .... I had this terrible sense of dread, I knew that I was heading to "outer darkness" and then I woke up Um .... Yeah. "Outer darkness" is not a place I want to go EVER
This "dent" he is talking about is accurate. The expansion of the universe is also accurate. The water thing is compete speculation. I believe the "expanse" was the dry land. Think he borrowed this from Kip Thorn. See warped side of the universe.
I am a Christian and a scientist honestly searching the Scriptures and the science for both YEC and OEC (not macroevolution - that is NOT science). This kind of biased speculation does not help toward that end. I appreciate his effort and sincerity and love of Christ as a brother in the faith; but I would hope when we talk science, it really is science. When the “highest heavens” and the “heavens” appear together, the former is the universe and the latter is the atmosphere on earth. So the “water” in Ps 148:4 are clouds on earth!
This is heartbreakingly stooped (sic). Yes, you can flash pix of Hawking and show us all your mad power point graphics skills like a boss, but science it's not, AT ALL!
How fitting it is that you begin your ignorant, mocking with a misspelling of the word that characterizes your statement: "stupid". Because your "analysis" is not accompanied by any corroborating scientifically vetted information it is merely your opinion, carries no weight of truth, and comes across as the meaningless babbling of uninformed, foolish, gibberish.
@@kirkhepburnmiddleagedwhiteguy And it's telling that you can't understand that the misspelling was quite deliberate. And your entire 2nd sentence (complete with bad grammar and poor punctuation) is an excellent description of the interpretations of the speaker.
Son, you misspelled stupid. A few physics classes (university level) would help you, but you have to learn the math (spelling and editing) as well. I made As in physics.
Oh, you noticed that. No flies on you, Mom. You sure are smart. You might look up "ad-homonym" and it's uses in distracting from the point. Perhaps, pray about. Well, have a life. I'll go ahead and edit for you. See if you can sop the dif. Toodls
This video was kind of fun though. The truth is that it is not worth an effort to try and explain science by using the Bible. The Bible is not a science book. The Bible is concerned with spiritual realities and was not written by or for scientists. I thought I was watching Christian comedy here but he is being serious?
That means the timeless zone is the "outer darkness" mentioned in the bible. That's why God said "let there be light" before he made the moon and the sun.
Scary
I had a dream a while back (I often rebuke demons in my dreams, this was not one of them but similar)
It all happened very fast. I was walking towards an elevator. The door was open, I stepped in, turned around to push the button to go up to the next floor. But I accidentally pushed the button to go down. At the same instant, I realized I was already on the basement floor. Then the doors shut, and the elevator began to plummet .... I had this terrible sense of dread, I knew that I was heading to "outer darkness" and then I woke up
Um .... Yeah. "Outer darkness" is not a place I want to go EVER
This "dent" he is talking about is accurate. The expansion of the universe is also accurate. The water thing is compete speculation. I believe the "expanse" was the dry land. Think he borrowed this from Kip Thorn. See warped side of the universe.
I came here interested to hear a rebuttal to this theory but all I read in the comments are snarky remarks with no science or theories offered.
I am a Christian and a scientist honestly searching the Scriptures and the science for both YEC and OEC (not macroevolution - that is NOT science). This kind of biased speculation does not help toward that end. I appreciate his effort and sincerity and love of Christ as a brother in the faith; but I would hope when we talk science, it really is science. When the “highest heavens” and the “heavens” appear together, the former is the universe and the latter is the atmosphere on earth. So the “water” in Ps 148:4 are clouds on earth!
This is heartbreakingly stooped (sic). Yes, you can flash pix of Hawking and show us all your mad power point graphics skills like a boss, but science it's not, AT ALL!
How fitting it is that you begin your ignorant, mocking with a misspelling of the word that characterizes your statement: "stupid".
Because your "analysis" is not accompanied by any corroborating scientifically vetted information it is merely your opinion, carries no weight of truth, and comes across as the meaningless babbling of uninformed, foolish, gibberish.
@@kirkhepburnmiddleagedwhiteguy And it's telling that you can't understand that the misspelling was quite deliberate.
And your entire 2nd sentence (complete with bad grammar and poor punctuation) is an excellent description of the interpretations of the speaker.
It is actually quite funny but I think this man has too much time on his hands.
Son, you misspelled stupid. A few physics classes (university level) would help you, but you have to learn the math (spelling and editing) as well. I made As in physics.
Oh, you noticed that. No flies on you, Mom. You sure are smart. You might look up "ad-homonym" and it's uses in distracting from the point. Perhaps, pray about. Well, have a life. I'll go ahead and edit for you. See if you can sop the dif. Toodls
I am a young Earth Christian, but this is just story telling, when we need honesty in the theories we present.
This video was kind of fun though. The truth is that it is not worth an effort to try and explain science by using the Bible. The Bible is not a science book. The Bible is concerned with spiritual realities and was not written by or for scientists. I thought I was watching Christian comedy here but he is being serious?
This is hard m m science
Oh, a profound speculation of his theory based upon Bible! Great!
“Peer reviewed solutions to Einstein’s equation” oh great.
@@danswy2114 You're thinking Einstein's work is unassailable?
How silly.