A New Satellite Is Preparing To Repair An Old Satellite

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лют 2020
  • Northrop Grumman's Mission Extension Vehicle is currently closing in on Intelsat 901 with a daring plan to provide it new propulsion and stabilization capability so that its communications gear can continue to provide service for years to come.
    The idea of repairing satellites in space is not a new one, but has largely been limited to Space Shuttle missions crewed by astronauts, making them only viable for things like the Hubble Space Telescope.
    But now a new class of robotic repair satellites are preparing to start giving old satellites a new lease of life at a fraction of the cost of a new spacecraft.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 803

  • @Awgolas
    @Awgolas 4 роки тому +17

    Scientist 1: "Well, there's no docking port, so it looks like IntelSat is totally f*cked. F*cked right in the thruster nozzle."
    Scientist 2: "...Okay I have an idea. It's gonna sound weird but just hear me out."

  • @thelonelyrogue3727
    @thelonelyrogue3727 4 роки тому +839

    Reality gets more Kerbal every day.

    • @amardeepsingh9031
      @amardeepsingh9031 4 роки тому +25

      Kerbel needs to become more kerbel now.

    • @anatollegros3454
      @anatollegros3454 4 роки тому +9

      I don't know why but this sentence made me incredibly happy, thanks!

    • @trr94001
      @trr94001 4 роки тому +14

      The Claw doesn’t care what it docks to.

    • @thelonelyrogue3727
      @thelonelyrogue3727 4 роки тому +8

      @Wroger Wroger yo what

    • @rapter229
      @rapter229 4 роки тому +11

      @@trr94001 THE CLAAAW

  • @craigmushens4789
    @craigmushens4789 4 роки тому +667

    MEV: “this is going to feel... weird”
    [sound of latex glove snapping]
    IntelSat: “WTF!”

    • @twistedyogert
      @twistedyogert 4 роки тому +44

      "Using your whole fist doc?

    • @bluemountain4181
      @bluemountain4181 4 роки тому +139

      MEV: "It's ok, getting an erection during this procedure is perfectly normal."
      Intelsat: "But I don't have an erection."
      MEV: "I do though."

    • @fire304
      @fire304 4 роки тому +4

      You win!

    • @WillArtie
      @WillArtie 4 роки тому +9

      HA! Nice.
      Reminds me, I should get my prostate checked...

    • @muzzdeni28
      @muzzdeni28 4 роки тому +15

      @@bluemountain4181 This channel is now not suitable for under 13's.

  • @chrisfromsouthaus2735
    @chrisfromsouthaus2735 4 роки тому +88

    4:00 And that kids, is where cubesats come from

  • @ChevronTango
    @ChevronTango 4 роки тому +307

    I was half expecting the refuelling sat to be a giant orange tank with a Clamp-O-Tron on it

    • @Fred_the_1996
      @Fred_the_1996 4 роки тому +5

      Me2

    • @otpyrcralphpierre1742
      @otpyrcralphpierre1742 4 роки тому +5

      ACME Space Clamp Company.

    • @blablablablablablblablabla
      @blablablablablablblablabla 4 роки тому +1

      the classic

    • @miscbits6399
      @miscbits6399 4 роки тому +4

      The thought of a BFR as a flying GEO fuel tank dispensing and refilling ME pods is attractive.
      A variant of ME pods could also be used to tow intact dead birds back down out of orbit at all levels too.

    • @johnmoruzzi7236
      @johnmoruzzi7236 4 роки тому +1

      Francis X. Clampazzo from Futurama... AKA "Clamps"

  • @bami2
    @bami2 4 роки тому +583

    So they didn't just rotate some landing legs in awkward orientation so they could grab the satellite?

    • @Lorem_the_Ipsum
      @Lorem_the_Ipsum 4 роки тому +56

      @@halvor9797 because it's the kerbal way.

    • @RobertoMattes
      @RobertoMattes 4 роки тому +15

      Landing legs? None of those satellites were designed to land anywhere...

    • @jarediannudalo6074
      @jarediannudalo6074 4 роки тому +19

      only in Kerbal 😂

    • @scottmanley
      @scottmanley  4 роки тому +404

      I think it's telling how many of my audience members no longer get kerbal references.

    • @thelonelyrogue3727
      @thelonelyrogue3727 4 роки тому +150

      @@scottmanley telling you that we need more KSP videos!

  • @linuxophile
    @linuxophile 4 роки тому +185

    "inserting the probe into the thrust chamber" made me giggle.

    • @Allan_aka_RocKITEman
      @Allan_aka_RocKITEman 4 роки тому +10

      Rocket scientist pillow talk...😝😝😝

    • @guilemaigre14
      @guilemaigre14 4 роки тому +8

      I think it is a reference to doing anal. I mean, where else can you get any thrust ?

    • @Allan_aka_RocKITEman
      @Allan_aka_RocKITEman 4 роки тому +2

      @@guilemaigre14 >>> Just beware of _propellant residue._
      😝😝😝

    • @-CLASSIFIED-
      @-CLASSIFIED- 3 роки тому +1

      is this how cube-sats are made? xD

  • @unvergebeneid
    @unvergebeneid 4 роки тому +116

    "mated" seems like the right word given how you described that mating procedure... 😳

    • @G_to_the_off
      @G_to_the_off 4 роки тому +6

      Bow chicka wow wow.

    • @AdrianHepburn-vz9yr
      @AdrianHepburn-vz9yr 4 роки тому +1

      Satellite heavy metal.

    • @alt8791
      @alt8791 4 роки тому +1

      bruh

    • @noahway13
      @noahway13 4 роки тому

      That satellite is not 18 yet...

    • @unvergebeneid
      @unvergebeneid 4 роки тому +1

      @@noahway13 Neither is the refueling probe. Let young satellites make their experiences!

  • @lithostheory
    @lithostheory 4 роки тому +348

    3:45... I hope they discussed consent before probing.

    • @leobieker9631
      @leobieker9631 4 роки тому +22

      Lithostheory hahah I was just thinking it was a bit of a phallic docking procedure.

    • @EthnHDmlle
      @EthnHDmlle 4 роки тому +9

      Probe love is beautiful, ok!

    • @ZeroRyoko
      @ZeroRyoko 4 роки тому +24

      In Space no one can here you Squee like a piggy!

    • @apostle602gmail
      @apostle602gmail 4 роки тому +8

      kinky

    • @nodisalsi
      @nodisalsi 4 роки тому +12

      …making lots of little satellites? LOL

  • @oscarmendez590
    @oscarmendez590 4 роки тому +82

    Gives new meaning to the term "fly safe"

    • @AndrewBlucher
      @AndrewBlucher 4 роки тому +3

      Fly United?

    • @Tondadrd
      @Tondadrd 4 роки тому +7

      @@AndrewBlucher fly with protection or fly protrcted

  • @HPD1171
    @HPD1171 4 роки тому +174

    3:43 this is the kind of porn that bender from futurama watches

  • @lithostheory
    @lithostheory 4 роки тому +55

    3:43 The satellite equivalent of the kiss of life :^D

  • @theCodyReeder
    @theCodyReeder 4 роки тому +97

    Oh this is so exciting!

    • @MrNight-dg1ug
      @MrNight-dg1ug 4 роки тому +1

      Sure is, Cody!

    • @sandercohen5543
      @sandercohen5543 4 роки тому +3

      one can only hope the the probee was as excited about the prospect, as the prober... :@

    • @MrNight-dg1ug
      @MrNight-dg1ug 4 роки тому +3

      I just realized. Cody called robot space sex excited.

    • @gentlejake605
      @gentlejake605 3 роки тому

      Hi how r u

  • @elopeous3285
    @elopeous3285 4 роки тому +30

    I am happy we finally got the grabber unit from the techtree

    • @HPD1171
      @HPD1171 4 роки тому +1

      this is the advanced "presidential grabber" capable of grabbing any satellite by the thrust chamber.

    • @kubluu
      @kubluu 4 роки тому

      It was delayed for 60 years because we researched the full social technology tree instead. And now we have Woke Twitter.

    • @73_65
      @73_65 2 роки тому

      @@KuK137 Yes, because those who only feel and do not think for them selves are pro-science.

  • @dewiz9596
    @dewiz9596 4 роки тому +31

    This is seriously cool. I have, somewhere in my collection of Analog magazines, a story about an astronaut who had a short notice launch to go up and repair a satellite. One of the concerns raised in the story was about electrical potential that might have been built up in the satellite while it had been in orbit. I must dig out the story and re-read it. . . It goes back to about 1965. . .
    It had never occurred to me that the moon would have an effect on the position of the Geostationary Satellites. . . The implication is that there is no such thing as a permanent orbit for ANY satellite. . . Am I correct? The Moon is, indeed, a Harsh Mistress.

    • @jessegd6306
      @jessegd6306 4 роки тому +10

      Yeah, orbits are always shifting ever so slightly due to gravitational pulls from, well, everything. Hell even our moon's orbit is constantly changing by roughly an inch every year or so.
      Least that's what I think, I'm going off of possibly dated Highschool-level science at best.

    • @purplealice
      @purplealice 4 роки тому +1

      I had a subscription to Analog when I was in high school...

    • @jamesmnguyen
      @jamesmnguyen 4 роки тому +3

      @@jessegd6306 The main reason the Moon's orbit is changing is because it's slowing down the rotation of the Earth, and in order to conserve angular momentum, its orbit drifts outward. Way into the future a lunar month will be the same as an Earth day. (If the Sun doesn't go Red Giant first, or the Moon gets kicked out of Earth's orbit)

    • @Uglydollsrises23132
      @Uglydollsrises23132 4 роки тому

      Post the author and title when you find. Still buying and reading Analog whenever I can.

    • @dewiz9596
      @dewiz9596 4 роки тому +4

      Steven Harbauer ‘’Stuck”, by John Berryman, June 1964. Some ”misremembering” on my part. . .

  • @lbogaardt
    @lbogaardt 4 роки тому +131

    8:20 Can this also be used to de-orbit old satellites?

    • @ke6gwf
      @ke6gwf 4 роки тому +57

      Easily lol
      Someone has to pay for it though...

    • @michaelesposito2629
      @michaelesposito2629 4 роки тому +42

      Sure, but the value you get from saving a satellite, compared to the cost, pales in comparison to the little value you’d get from downing a satellite. As the person above said, someone’s gotta pay for it.

    • @idjles
      @idjles 4 роки тому +12

      Yes but you’d need huge amounts of fuel - maybe in decades when we get an asteroid in orbit to provide the fuel - but then you could refurbish them instead of trashing them.

    • @scottmanley
      @scottmanley  4 роки тому +51

      Yes, - see my ESTEC videos from last year

    • @gmanor20
      @gmanor20 4 роки тому +10

      Maybe in the future solar sail craft can lock onto and deorbit old satellites. It would solve the fuel problem.

  • @yrmoma
    @yrmoma 4 роки тому +77

    Reduce, reuse, and recycle.... in spaaaaaace

    • @pzoe3808
      @pzoe3808 4 роки тому +1

      That’s the way it was in the 50s now it’s throwaway and we buy new I prefer the 50s before plastic

  • @staggerwings
    @staggerwings 4 роки тому +8

    The MEV reminds me of those early animations of a retrovirus attaching itself to a cell wall.

  • @misium
    @misium 4 роки тому +59

    3:38" It will maneuver behind it, insert a probe into it and grab its thrust chamber".

  • @Allan_aka_RocKITEman
    @Allan_aka_RocKITEman 4 роки тому +3

    FWIW: That _nozzle docking_ thing reminded me that I had a medical appointment just a couple of days ago, and I got _the finger wave,_ if you take my meaning...😊

  • @sundayridetexas416
    @sundayridetexas416 4 роки тому +36

    When real life is just as cool as science fiction. Ty for the cool science video.

    • @illuminate4622
      @illuminate4622 4 роки тому +1

      My thoughts exactly! Technology is getting really crazy...

    • @oisnowy5368
      @oisnowy5368 4 роки тому +1

      Only just as? :P

    • @73_65
      @73_65 2 роки тому

      @@oisnowy5368 Nah, its not even just as cool since we are still stuck on Earth for the most part, maybe if we can make access to orbit comparable to long distance flights now cost wise I might agree that real life is just as cool as science fiction.

  • @snipersquad100
    @snipersquad100 4 роки тому +253

    We be having baby-sats in 9 months.

    • @roadsweeper1
      @roadsweeper1 4 роки тому +26

      Is that how microsats are made? :)

    • @rimpri
      @rimpri 4 роки тому +17

      nope, wrong hole.

    • @alt8791
      @alt8791 4 роки тому +7

      Some new cubesats be on their way

    • @Allan_aka_RocKITEman
      @Allan_aka_RocKITEman 4 роки тому +1

      @@rimpri >>> That's what SHE said...😄

    • @deusexaethera
      @deusexaethera 4 роки тому +6

      No there won't, not based on where the MEV is sticking its probe.

  • @anim8torfiddler871
    @anim8torfiddler871 4 роки тому +4

    As an Animation producer and enthusiast, I would love to see production credits for those animated sequences. Thanks.

  • @JeffreyBue_imtxsmoke
    @JeffreyBue_imtxsmoke 4 роки тому +5

    This is so cool! I always felt there was a market for extending the life of GEO satellites. We are currently living in a great time for space exploration. Thank you for making these videos Scott. This channel has the most interesting and excellently delivered content for us space nerds.

  • @ulfjonsson1472
    @ulfjonsson1472 4 роки тому +50

    talking about Sat on sat action :P

    • @twistedyogert
      @twistedyogert 4 роки тому +3

      Kinky

    • @sandercohen5543
      @sandercohen5543 4 роки тому

      ”Här ser vi ett kärlekspar av högst sällsynt slag, utföra en parningsritual.”

  • @jackdeniston9326
    @jackdeniston9326 4 роки тому +6

    Mother of god this is total Thunderbird 3 action. It is so good to be alive today.

  • @Ribbonius
    @Ribbonius 4 роки тому +2

    That docking maneuver looks nasty

  • @ninjasiren
    @ninjasiren 4 роки тому +44

    Comments:
    80% - Satellite Rule 34
    15% - Earth is Kerbin
    5% - Actual curious people. (Deorbiting, recycling, stuff)

    • @kaelandin
      @kaelandin 4 роки тому

      John Daniel Esguerra
      Change that 60% to 80%

    • @SpicyTrifongo
      @SpicyTrifongo 4 роки тому

      /r/IAmVerySmart

    • @kaelandin
      @kaelandin 4 роки тому +1

      r/ihavereddit

    • @SpicyTrifongo
      @SpicyTrifongo 4 роки тому

      @@kaelandin how does one have a website?

  • @KarpKomet
    @KarpKomet 4 роки тому +24

    Sounds like Satellites are gonna have gas caps soon.

    • @goobot1
      @goobot1 3 роки тому

      Oil tankers in space

  • @thecrapadventuresofchesimo420
    @thecrapadventuresofchesimo420 4 роки тому +20

    For some reason, nearly every time you or anyone else covers one of these 'new' concepts I think to myself "finally! shouldn't we have already been doing that?"
    I guess the figuring out part has to wait until the need is no longer in the future (ie you will need this in your tenure as ceo, rather than the next guy will need this).
    Is that really pessimistic?

    • @gnaskar
      @gnaskar 4 роки тому +2

      The main thing is cost. Used to be that launches were so expensive that building a new satellite was cheaper than maintaining one on orbit, but now highend satellites are getting more expensive, low end ones (like the service sat) are getting cheaper, and launch costs have dived as companies scramble to match SpaceX's prices. So it suddenly became a worthwhile endeavor 5-6 years ago, and then it's taken a while to develop the systems.

    • @dsdy1205
      @dsdy1205 2 роки тому

      not really pessimistic, just realistic

  • @MrSlientdeath
    @MrSlientdeath 4 роки тому +5

    I think it would be cool to do the piggy back method for the hubble when its reaction wheels fail.

  • @RurouniKalain
    @RurouniKalain 4 роки тому

    I'm not sure how many of these you already knew about and what you read from news articles but the fact that you know your stuff here makes me impressed. Good stuff.

  • @Fantazzim
    @Fantazzim 4 роки тому +32

    I hope they find a way to service Hubble to keep it going for a while longer.

    • @nuthenry2
      @nuthenry2 4 роки тому +8

      Hubble have been service by astronauts, unfortunately Hubble internal components will required complete replacement

    • @jamesburleson1916
      @jamesburleson1916 4 роки тому +6

      I would bet that a well planned Dragon 2 mission could service Hubble, if they could figure out how to tether the two craft together. Dragon 2 has that lovely trunk that could hold the replacement parts, and I'm sure they could figure out a space suit with an umbilical for such missions.

    • @illuminate4622
      @illuminate4622 4 роки тому +4

      Get it to orbit the Moon.

    • @CarlosAM1
      @CarlosAM1 4 роки тому

      @@illuminate4622 good luck

    • @gqh007
      @gqh007 4 роки тому

      @@jamesburleson1916 kaching

  • @Daniel-ld7pz
    @Daniel-ld7pz 4 роки тому +25

    Could somethings like this happen to Hubble to repair the reaction wheels?

    • @scottmanley
      @scottmanley  4 роки тому +41

      It's being considered.
      Hubble does have anchor points for the Shuttle's manipulator arm.

    • @thePronto
      @thePronto 4 роки тому +6

      Prolly quicker than waiting for JWST...

    • @stevenf1678
      @stevenf1678 4 роки тому

      The hubble does have an anchor point but it doesn't have plug and unplug reaction wheels. Only the hands of an astronaut have the dexterity needed to replace the reaction wheels. It would be easier to simply deorbit the hubble and launch a new one with modules that could simply be unplugged and replaced with the robot arm.

    • @LoneStarr1979
      @LoneStarr1979 4 роки тому +9

      @@stevenf1678 I guess the idea is to permanently attach a service-probe with strong enough reaction wheels on board to hubble via the anchor points. The service-probe doing the orientation-keeping, hubble dooing the observing.

    • @73_65
      @73_65 2 роки тому

      @@thePronto JWST and Hubble have different roles, and while it likely would be faster to just attach new reaction wheels to Hubble that wouldnt work for computer problems as far as Im aware.

  • @aceathor
    @aceathor 4 роки тому +3

    This morning 02/07 at 6 am French time, I saw a line of at least 6 or 7 satelites very close together from each other heading south-east.

  • @LoneWolf0648
    @LoneWolf0648 4 роки тому +3

    this kind of stuff could take the Hubble, clamp a section on the back of it with new gyros, more sensors, and whatnot and keep that beast doing what it was built to do, combine that with the robotic arms and you could swap out internal parts like the shuttle used to do and install modern systems to give it more life.

    • @johnborden9208
      @johnborden9208 4 роки тому +2

      I doubt it could do something as complicated as swapping out internals (though I could be wrong), but at the very least we could boost Hubble's orbit so someday astronauts can service it again.

  • @rherman9085
    @rherman9085 4 роки тому

    As always, yu have great content, provide excellent details. Thanks!

  • @AR-jx6wr
    @AR-jx6wr 4 роки тому +4

    Damnit Jim! I’m a robot, not a doctor!

  • @protheu5
    @protheu5 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you for your content, Scott.

  • @twistedyogert
    @twistedyogert 4 роки тому +15

    3:19 I know this is supposed to be a serious video but I started snickering when I heard that for the first time.

  • @freesaxon6835
    @freesaxon6835 4 роки тому

    This channel certainly keeps *us* up to date as well

  • @shadowraith1
    @shadowraith1 4 роки тому +9

    Great idea, if it works. Hopefully goes well. Another sign that cooperation is key. Not only in space. Humanity needs to learn to cooperate in all disciplines. Or quite frankly were done.

  • @valoriel4464
    @valoriel4464 4 роки тому +1

    Fascinating, thx Scott

  • @PinataOblongata
    @PinataOblongata 4 роки тому +5

    Remember how those reaction wheels failed with internal arcing and pitting? How protected would those robotic arm joints have to be?

    • @stevenf1678
      @stevenf1678 4 роки тому +1

      It wouldn't take much. In this case the static charge is mostly from the ion engines on the tugboat satellite. the arm or hand in this case would be electrically isolated for the reset of the tugboat to minimize any charge on it. then each joint bearing would simply have a small conductive wire attached to both sides of the bearing. Remember the bearings on robotic arms do not coninousely rotate over 360 degrees. Instead they only joint bearing will only move back and forth with lesss than 300 degrees of motion.

  • @Wheelo40
    @Wheelo40 4 роки тому

    This is all so cool. Thanks for the great video!

  • @craigtate5930
    @craigtate5930 4 роки тому +1

    Very cool! Be even cooler if in the future they could recycle/reuse old satellites by just combining this part or that pod or module, like a set of lego blocks in the sky

  • @Bob43547
    @Bob43547 4 роки тому +1

    This is really cool. I've just started a masters degree in satellite engineering with a focus on formation flying and docking of satellites. My plans are to demonstrate a fully autonomous formation flight and dock on a 3DOF air bearing satellite simulator.

  • @gaalidas4836
    @gaalidas4836 4 роки тому +1

    I've often spoken to colleagues about this sort of orbital repair. Once to see I wasn't alone in that.

  • @hene193
    @hene193 4 роки тому +1

    I'd think the modular approach would be more popular in future. If the thrusters or gimbals fail then just send new propulsion module to replace it. It's easier to design the comms part to be more robust

  • @leojciaccioii
    @leojciaccioii 4 роки тому +2

    3:34
    Whoah! Uhhh huh huhh that satelite is gonna score beavis... science kicks ass

  • @tehbonehead
    @tehbonehead 4 роки тому +1

    Scott.. your description of the docking process was... vivid.
    You ever think about writing some of those torrid romance novels?

  • @kerbonaut2059
    @kerbonaut2059 4 роки тому +16

    Hoo yes! This is interesting!

  • @kenleach2516
    @kenleach2516 4 роки тому +1

    Nice update, enjoying it

  • @andrewreynolds9371
    @andrewreynolds9371 4 роки тому +1

    It's good to see that there are companies out there working on solutions to real world problems like this.

  • @jpsimas2
    @jpsimas2 4 роки тому +1

    I hope this leads to some sort of standardization on, for example, some kind of interface to be grabbed in this kind of mission or some standard refueling interface in the future

  • @CavstudWillie
    @CavstudWillie 4 роки тому +2

    Hey Scott! I love your videos. One question I had for my meteorology teacher in 5th grade was if there's no resistance in space, why doesn't a space craft that is burning propellant not constantly moving away from earth. Through KSP I learned that the answer is gravity. The question I have for you is it possible to use electromagnets to propel a craft, or use it to make small corrections. A very simplified explanation is a ball bearing held in place by springs surrounded by electro magnets. If you want to move in a direction, supply power to the corresponding magnet. What do you think?

    • @u1zha
      @u1zha 3 роки тому

      It would just displace the craft by a fraction of the spring's length. The center of mass of the entire system will stay on the same orbit as it was. Conservation of impulse and energy.

  • @squirrelgray945
    @squirrelgray945 4 роки тому

    Whoa congrats on the 1 mil subs :D

  • @herpsenderpsen
    @herpsenderpsen 4 роки тому +1

    perhaps this will open the way to small docking port standards for future satellite missions

  • @williambrightwell3351
    @williambrightwell3351 4 роки тому

    Everyone of your videos sir is amazing and interesting to watch. Thanks for the great content!

  • @Jbot123
    @Jbot123 4 роки тому

    That's really amazing. That should really help extend the life of a lot of sats and reduce the overall cost of space tech.

  • @Ottee2
    @Ottee2 4 роки тому

    Good to know. Thanks, Scott.

  • @AsbestosMuffins
    @AsbestosMuffins 4 роки тому +4

    it'd be cool if they took the lessons learned from this and service hubble before it crashes sometime in the next decade

  • @MARILYNANDERSON88
    @MARILYNANDERSON88 4 роки тому

    Exciting and fascinating presentation.Looking forward to more.

  • @flightmaster999
    @flightmaster999 4 роки тому

    This is some awesome new technology! The potential for such "satellite extenders/boosters" is huge given the amount of satellites up there and the ones that are still being put into orbit every year.
    The other cool consequence of repairing satellites in orbit and extending their life cycles is the reduction of "space junk" that comes from old satellites that have either collided or are slowly falling back to earth.

  • @francispicotte6174
    @francispicotte6174 4 роки тому

    Those are pretty cool missions. Would love to work on them!

  • @asgallant1219
    @asgallant1219 4 роки тому +2

    JWST has a short projected life in its primary mission due to the limited coolant supply on board. I wonder if we could fly a service satellite to refill/recharge the coolant to extend JWST's primary life? Given how long it has taken to build and test JWST, and how expensive it is, seems like extending its primary mission would be worth exploring. The same technique could possibly help with other space observatories that break down over time, like Kepler.

    • @hamzahkhan8952
      @hamzahkhan8952 5 місяців тому

      JWST is a lot harder to service, not just because of its location. its extremely sensitive (sensitive thermal protective system on one side, and mirrors on the other) and it would be very hard for a space craft to service it. also, idk how a spacecraft could manage to clamp on to it.
      Kepler would probably be easier tho.

  • @martijnjongepoerink3459
    @martijnjongepoerink3459 4 роки тому

    So, Yeah....., had some dirty thoughts at 3.50 or so, comment was made allready, no need to repeat.
    However...., is this the first (intented) tugboat in space? AWESOME!!!
    To all the engineers and techs involved in this, THANK YOU!!!
    We're getting closer to a ring around the Earth.

  • @Restilia_ch
    @Restilia_ch 4 роки тому +2

    Sounds like Space AAA is getting off the ground nicely.

  • @antiqueperfection
    @antiqueperfection 4 роки тому +9

    Anybody else hear 'Space Systems Yanny' at 5:40? 😎

  • @TechDragon1
    @TechDragon1 4 роки тому

    It really is incredible that this type of stuff is happening now. The future of space is bright indeed!

  • @HylanderSB
    @HylanderSB 4 роки тому +1

    I work across the hall from the NASA folks doing satellite servicing. They were formed from the remains of HST’s development branch after the last servicing mission rendered them moot. Cepi couldn’t let NASA’s servicing capability die even if the upper brass didn’t fully appreciate it.

  • @suffysdave
    @suffysdave 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks!

  • @markbrown4442
    @markbrown4442 4 роки тому +1

    That is so cool!!!! A great way of starting to reuse/recycle what would have been spacejunk

  • @dimmerdoon
    @dimmerdoon 4 роки тому +1

    Good to see these coming to life. I wounder if they will look into a special one just for the JWST as we know hubble had its troubles over the years

  • @dinoschachten
    @dinoschachten 4 роки тому

    Wooooow! That is sooo cool! Especially that the MEV can un-mate and go assist elsewhere! And obviously the overlord of servicing, the MRV! What a cool future-worthy solution!

  • @flamencoprof
    @flamencoprof 4 роки тому

    I was born in the early Fifties. I make a parallel to someone born fifty years prior, An old ex-horse and coach driver marvels at the Grand Prix cars of the Fifties.
    It is absolutely marvellous what is going on in these times.

  • @Alex-yk6he
    @Alex-yk6he 4 роки тому

    Congratulations on a million subscribers!!!

  • @KerbalRocketry
    @KerbalRocketry 4 роки тому +3

    This should be happening sometimes tommorow/this evening (depending on timezones). will happen during the night (so that ground based sensors can keep an eye on things) over Hawaii.

    • @thePronto
      @thePronto 4 роки тому

      Nothing better than doing this on a Saturday night in Hawai'i. Especially after a few Kona Longboards...

    • @KerbalRocketry
      @KerbalRocketry 4 роки тому

      @@thePronto it's a hard job but somebodies got to do... (i will never not be jealous of the people who operate telescopes in Hawaii)

  • @KermitFrazierdotcom
    @KermitFrazierdotcom 4 роки тому

    I like the Pod Idea, cuz you can place them as self docking auxiliary propulsion units on several units. Of course, that's what you're talking about.

  • @spoons27
    @spoons27 4 роки тому +1

    Fascinating truly amazing

  • @nightrous3026
    @nightrous3026 4 роки тому

    Congrats on a million subs!

  • @beefcakes0623
    @beefcakes0623 4 роки тому +6

    I've never been so early but I'm just as happy when I watch these videos

  • @KalRandom
    @KalRandom 4 роки тому +1

    About frigin time they do this.

  • @getahanddown
    @getahanddown 4 роки тому +2

    Hi Scott, off topic but I've been wanting to ask, do you recon we could extend the Voyager missions by lanching coms relay satellite/s? It wouldn't need to be fancy, just radio relay.
    Thanks for the videos!

    • @KOZMOuvBORG
      @KOZMOuvBORG 4 роки тому +1

      It's the power supply that failing, not the radio. In the decade it would take to catch up, the replacement would be dead too.
      Send out a TAU instead, the baseline that would provide would improve Astrometery

  • @jmd1743
    @jmd1743 4 роки тому +2

    We need something like this for the Webb.

  • @skuzlebut82
    @skuzlebut82 4 роки тому +1

    You forgot SolarMax was grabbed and fixed by a shuttle mission, also. Featured in The Dream is Alive.

  • @James_Knapp
    @James_Knapp 4 роки тому

    1 Million subscribers, congratulations.

  • @08VaNupe
    @08VaNupe 3 роки тому

    Glad I was a part of this

  • @danielhall5364
    @danielhall5364 4 роки тому +1

    It would be great if a similar MEV could be used to keep Hubble functioning longer

  • @lucywucyyy
    @lucywucyyy 4 роки тому

    extreemely cool, i hope in the future satelites are designed with standerdized grapple points and refuling probes

  • @Mycobob
    @Mycobob 4 роки тому

    I love this kind of stuff! This is the coolest stuff in space now

  • @colinmerritt7645
    @colinmerritt7645 4 роки тому +1

    When two satellites love each other very much....

  • @philipmumford7871
    @philipmumford7871 4 роки тому

    This is so cool. Wouldn't you have loved to be a software or hardware engineer on this project!

  • @matrick1356
    @matrick1356 4 роки тому +1

    I bet the arms are from Canada
    and congrats on 1m! woo!!

  • @fnamelname9077
    @fnamelname9077 4 роки тому

    Now *that's* a docking operation.

  • @TiberiusMaximus
    @TiberiusMaximus 4 роки тому +1

    what a great idea, did a Proctologist come up with the docking maneuver Scott?

  • @TRIP5_GAMING
    @TRIP5_GAMING 4 роки тому

    absolutely brilliant! ...

  • @b1laxson
    @b1laxson 4 роки тому

    Gotta catch 'em all!

  • @Spedley_2142
    @Spedley_2142 4 роки тому

    That is actually seriously cool.

  • @spaceman9599
    @spaceman9599 4 роки тому

    Finally, recycling in space :) This has always been one of my favourite 'what if' space systems engineering/business cases. Cool to see it taking off finally!