You’re gonna forget sadly. If not you then the future generations definitely. Muslims can follow “ don’t forget nor forgive” quote but sikhs worry about others more than themselves sometimes.
@@JohnyWickerson the government wants to make us forget it so bad. whenever someone stands up to make new young sikhs realize what crimes have been done against them, he or she is labelled as a terrorist and anti national
@@JohnyWickerson why ? How only Muslims? Are you trying to imply that only Muslims have suffered through such genocides and only they can experience such immense pain? Are you trying to say Sikhs are selfish and only care about themselves? You are 100% incorrect. If you read Sikh history, many women and men sacrificed their family members and children under the rule of the Muslims because they didn't want to rule. Many sacrificed themselves. And yet you call us selfish?
@@JohnyWickersonI wonder about that. How greedy and power hungry those Muslims were, wanting to spread only their religion and wanting to end Sikhism. Jokes on them though, now there are around 30 million Sikhs. Their mission failed horribly.
no video on sikh genocide committed on much larger scale by pakistani muslims in 1947 ???? you were driven out of lahore and nankana sahib (your holiest shrine). scared to point that out ? never forget 1984 but always forget 47 ????????
I am a Canadian Sikh, I have had to live with the effects of 1984 on my health ever since a child, and all those I know had the same. We feel betrayed by india, and they do not care about us and label us terrorists and separatists when we did the most for them than any of other people..the shame...I cannot believe it, the anger we feel and the sadness. What do we even do? Khalistan is getting too political and we do not identify with violence, but freedom fighting and justice. We gave everyone their homes.. even the british... 20% of the British army in ww1 was Sikh...when will we get a home?
no video on sikh genocide committed on much larger scale by pakistani muslims in 1947 ???? you were driven out of lahore and nankana sahib (your holiest shrine). scared to point that out ?
@@sol90981 Yes, this is true , but these Rajputs helped train the Gurus army as a gratitude to Shri Guru Har Gobind ji who secured the release of 52 kings from the Mughal 's Gwalior fort. (Sikhs celebrate this day) I would say he is talking about helping the Sikhs who were trying to defend invasions from the Afghans.
@@kidkully No, the Rathore Rajputs did not teach Gatka to Sikhs, Guru Hargobind, the first Sikh guru to engage in warfare, is credited with establishing Gatka, a martial art form that originated in Punjab in the 15th century
@@kidkully The relationship between the Rajputs and Sikhs is complex. While the Rajputs were known for their martial traditions and warrior culture, the Sikhs developed their own distinct identity and military prowess over time, particularly during the 17th and 18th centuries
@@mrluciferlucerna According to the Sikhan di Bhagat Ratan Mala, written in the 17th century, Guru Hargobind, the sixth Sikh Guru, was taught Shastravidya (the science of weapons) by two Rajput Hindus named Rao Sigara and Rao Jaita. Guru Gobind Singh, the tenth and last Sikh Guru, was also taught Shastravidya by a Rajput Hindu named Rao Bajjar Singh Rathore, who was the great-grandson of Rao Mandan Ji Rathore. Later, Guru Gobind Singh’s children were taught by Rai Alam Singh Chauhan, who is still considered one of the finest generals to have ever led Sikhs. Rai Alam Singh also never converted to Sikhism and Banda Singh Bahadur arguably the fiercest Sikh Warrior ever was also born a Hindu Rajput from Manhas clan of present day Jammu
I feel very disturbed & bad for what evil cruelty happened with our Sikhs brothers & sisters in 84, and Punjabi Hindus too. Congress did something really evil cruel to the Sikhs, and to it's reaction, some "extremists" were borned, who then reciprocated that on some Punjabi Hindus. This political party Congress back then literally played dirty politics through, and to appease Sikhs, Sonia Gandhi made a Sikh PM, insulted our PM Shri Manmohan Singh, to show her power games. I hope with time, upcoming generations should remain away from hate Waheguruji Da Khalsa ❤❤ Waheguruji Di Fateh ❤❤ Jai Shree Ram
upcoming generations are very much in love with the hate whatever congress did blatantly back in the day, BJP is doing very efficiently today all political parties are Evil
You lie. If Congress was appeasing Sikhs then how Indira attacked Darbar Sahib? It is only anti Indira RSS and BJP propaganda. Read the book by LK Advani (his autobiography) He clearly wrote that they forced Indira to wipe out Sikhs. So honestly at that time no Hindu was in support of Sikhs except Late PM of India Sh. Chandershekhar. I was young lawyer of 30 yrs in 84 and remember he was only one voice to say, Indira did wrong. We Sikhs have not forgotten atrocities of Aurangzeb, Suba Sarhind for killing of younger sons of Guru Gobind Singh ji or Abdali for ghallughara and same way our generations will remember the genocide of Sikhs in 1984.
We Sikhs have fogotten Aurangzeb, Abdali or Suba Sirhind so far atrocities. Same way, We can not forget 84 genocide of Sikhs. I was not Indira or Congress alone. Read autobiography of L K Advani where he clearly wrote that they forced Indira to attack Darbar Sahib. RSS also played anti Sikh propaganda since 1947 and even before that. Why no Marhatta Brahmin was touched when your so called father of nation was murdered or no Tamil was touched when Rajiv Gandhi was blown to pieces. Because, killed and killers were both Hindus. (sorry to say so bluntly but it is hard truth) Indira was not a bigger leader than Mahtma Gandhi. Time will come.
Congress party did the massacre of Sikhs in India but irony is the same party won in Punjab and Delhi where Sikhs lives in big numbers numerous times post 1984 and even in 2024 they have won many seats . No one talks about Innocent Hindus butchered by Sikh terrorist just because of their religion. They had no hand in 1984 golden temple bloodshed or Delhi riots . Justice is pending for both Sikhs and Hindus. Hopefully Tytler one of the accused is in Jail with no let out under current government.
@@Arnold_Thelegend proof it. Congress leader are in jail or on bail. Which one in RSS or BJP were involved? Answer is zero. RSS only problem is they call Sikhs as part of Hindus which Sikh don’t like otherwise they have nothing against Sikhs . Stop spreading lies.
Lol same typical Congress blaming. Sikhs boycotted the elections while Hindus voted for congress. Also bjp where the ones protesting that they would smoke cigarettes around Amritsar when Sikhs banned them
Bjp, congress and rss were all involved in 1984 massacre, the reason why Congress won this time's election are because they are the lesser evil than aap and bjp currently. We have seen what aap has done to panjab in bhagwant Mann's time and what bjp has done to farmers, voting for Congress would be the least harmful for Panjab, if there were more competent people like Bhai Amritpal Singh and Bhai Sarabjeet Singh Congress wouldn't have gotten a single seat.
I'm non Indian, non Sikh, has hindu lineage but became a humanitarian religionist since late70-80s here in Cda, only read the Real Details about India's 1984 riots some 5-10 yrs ago after visiting few Gurduwaras in Mississauga/Brampton etc, then some UA-cam vlogs & google search etc. Now my believe is that I.Gandhi's Gov could've & should've tacled the Amristrar rebellious Sikhs incident much differently, Like sending in 95% non violent Sikh army specialist only with minimal guns etc & only to pecefully arrest the rebels, instead of all the tear gases, shootings, blood sheds etc actions happened inside this very Revered Holy Temple,... then I.Gandi would've been alive, there would've been No Riots, etc, etc. Just as there have been at least 2-3 Sikh PMs/ Janathypathy etc since 1984s time, And its time there ought to be less demands etc of separation. Not to forget the Sikh Religion primarily formed to repel the regular repeated attack & invasion attempts of Moguls etc Islamic forces, & that were successfully defended & most of Sikhs & Punjab stayed in tact compare to Bengal, Gujarat, Delhi, etc. If I'm not mistaken.
Khalistanis and Sikhs are different, Khalistanis are mostly in Trudeau and jagmeets Canada not India anymore. Even Hindus have been in Punjab for over 5000 years and various dynasties. Sikhi is an extension of Vedic philosophy from 5000 years in a 500 year reiteration. What happened in 84 was militants with weapons from Pak and China taking a holy place of worship hostage forcing the army action. Did congress and the gandhis mishandle, yes bjp says that loudest then anyone today.
Mughals were a mercenary force who were regularly employed by the Byzantine empire (Roman ) they hijacked Islam like Constantine hijacked Christianity and made laws to persecute non Christians or Christians who didn't follow their interpretations Guru Nanak knew this , hence was against forced conversions , circumcision, etc etc why ? Because non of these " requirements " are in the Quran ,, so he worked out the Mughals were fake Muslims ,,, because in his biography he Say's himself whoever is behaving like Muhammad is a true Muslim ,,, so obviously they were not behaving like they should of and he must of known the biography of Muhammad to make that statement and many Sikh people don't know this but Guru Nanak was unalived ,, by certain people who didn't like his interpretation of in my opinion the Quran itself ,,, he understood the Quran better than most Muslims ,,,
As Hindu From Maharashtra my heart goes down whenever I hear 1984, I know the pain cannot go by words but I Apologize to Everyone going through this pain if it makes any difference😔. But I would also pay my condolences to all Hindu Sikh Families in panjab Haryana Delhi Who lost their Loved ones in Panjab insurgency 🙏🙏🙏
Khalistanis and Sikhs are different, Khalistanis are mostly in Trudeau and jagmeets Canada not India anymore. Even Hindus have been in Punjab for over 5000 years and various dynasties. Sikhi is an extension of Vedic philosophy from 5000 years in a 500 year reiteration. What happened in 84 was militants with weapons from Pak and China taking a holy place of worship hostage forcing the army action. Did congress and the gandhis mishandle, yes bjp says that loudest then anyone today.
@@Supremeleaderkimjongun0 The mishandling of the rights of sikhs, and the Ideological war of forcing us into the hindu title is exactly why these "militants" picked up arms in the first place. They tried covering up the genocide as much as possible, but had to eventually accept history. ofc they would condemn it now.
So terrorists occupying and misusing the Golden Temple is not wrong, but the Indian army's entry into the temple in order to liberate it from the clutches of those terrorists in wrong.
Everything is 20/20 in hindsight. Like saying Bush/ America should not have invaded Iraq/ Afghanistan after 9/11 causing greatest human tragedy which is even continuing today. Indra did what should be done at that time.
So in 1984 they learned how bad hindus are and they got fruit of what they did with muslims of their towns villages of tehir own punjabi people in 1947...we will forgive but never forget
1984 was really sad but why did it happen? 1) score settling by local Congress people ( not RSS Hindus) and 2) some general mob anger.. because of assassination of the PM ( not Hindu PM but THE PM ) ,, why was Indiarji killed because she took a strong stand against the terrorist who had Hijacked the Golden Temple,, and before that all the Khalistani terror including bombing of Kanishka .... Majority of Hindus always respected Sikhs and always will because they are blood brothers ( remember SIkhs and Hindus both suffered during partition) But now days Hindus had enough of this hatred thrown by the Khalistanis
no video on sikh genocide committed on much larger scale by pakistani muslims in 1947 ???? you were driven out of lahore and nankana sahib (your holiest shrine). scared to point that out ?
That was not an attack on golden Temple but on a terrorist hiding inside like a rat, and was not ready to come after multiple requests and warnings from govt so army had to go in
that terrorist surrendered a year before and was released because of no evidence against him...,no terrorist holds open conferences where anyone is welcome without frisking..,he was labeled terrorist by the sold out media of the government,if he was a rat he should have ran out at the first sound of tanks like many other people who left the grounds through secret ways and lived to tell the tale but he was a warrior who there to sacrifice himself for the honor of sikh faith..,Now obviously you are an ignorant idiot and stupid enough that you cant recognize the difference between modern and medieval combat.., now in modern times soldiers have to take cover and fire just like a shield and sword shield to protect sword to attack...,He was an honorable warrior who wouldnt come out hands up like a chicken instead he chose to die like a lion so as to uphold the image of khalsa panth
They could have arrested him peacefully But they attacked our akal takht sahib is that you call justice? If same thing happen to your ram mandir you will say same
@@Dhaliwalz69 he was not ready to get arrested he had picked up arms Against govt, how could one arrest him, A S atwal was shot dead for even discussing his arrest. And attack on ram mandir has already happened, Hindus are not terrorists like khalistani that they will hide in ram mandir with weapons inside our temple, we care for temples unlike bhindrawala
Samjhauta Express bombing, Ajmer Sharif bombing, we can also go on and on about the all sides. If you label a terrorist attack as done by Sikhs then also label the 1984 genocide against Sikhs as done by Hindus. Because if you use religion as the identity then you can’t pick and choose.
@@luisluis5306 Oh really and what about the blood on hand of those Sikhs ( not all ) who did terrorist activities before operation blue star, killing both innocent Hindus and SIkhs also
Have heard horrific tales of Bindrawala and the terrorists housed in the Golden temple ? How is it that this issue was not addressed ? They tarnished the sanctity of the Golden temple with their atrocious acts.
@@cg5611 what terrorists? So now everyone that carries a weapon is a terrorist? What about those selfish Hindus that killed thousands and thousands of innocent Sikh men, raped Sikh women, and snatched away Sikh children? Bhindrawale was not a terrorist. In fact, he was a hero for some Hindu girls, as he married them without asking for dowry. Do not blindly call Sikhs terrorists. They were not hiding in the temple, as they eventually walked out, leading to the shooting of Bhindrawale. Secondly, if there was no shooting happened by the Sikhs, then you cannot call them terrorist. Have some common sense.
no video on sikh genocide committed on much larger scale by pakistani muslims in 1947 ???? you were driven out of lahore and nankana sahib (your holiest shrine). scared to point that out ?
84 genocide is a painful truth Sikhs cannot forget or forgive
You’re gonna forget sadly. If not you then the future generations definitely. Muslims can follow “ don’t forget nor forgive” quote but sikhs worry about others more than themselves sometimes.
Ever wonder how the muslims ruled punjab for more a thousand years
@@JohnyWickerson the government wants to make us forget it so bad. whenever someone stands up to make new young sikhs realize what crimes have been done against them, he or she is labelled as a terrorist and anti national
@@JohnyWickerson why ? How only Muslims? Are you trying to imply that only Muslims have suffered through such genocides and only they can experience such immense pain? Are you trying to say Sikhs are selfish and only care about themselves? You are 100% incorrect. If you read Sikh history, many women and men sacrificed their family members and children under the rule of the Muslims because they didn't want to rule. Many sacrificed themselves. And yet you call us selfish?
@@JohnyWickersonI wonder about that. How greedy and power hungry those Muslims were, wanting to spread only their religion and wanting to end Sikhism. Jokes on them though, now there are around 30 million Sikhs. Their mission failed horribly.
Waheguru aap jee nu CHARDI KALA VICH RAKHE,
Proud to be an sikh❤❤
Proud to be sikh!
Thank God you are back to Sikhism.
I don’t understand India but everyone deserves respect if they’re good citizens
never forget 1984
no video on sikh genocide committed on much larger scale by pakistani muslims in 1947 ???? you were driven out of lahore and nankana sahib (your holiest shrine). scared to point that out ? never forget 1984 but always forget 47 ????????
@ thats done by britisher but indian army destroyed harminder sahib
@@TantuMantu-x9d How bout both? then what would you say?
Wow this is ross street in Vancouver BC
I am a Canadian Sikh, I have had to live with the effects of 1984 on my health ever since a child, and all those I know had the same. We feel betrayed by india, and they do not care about us and label us terrorists and separatists when we did the most for them than any of other people..the shame...I cannot believe it, the anger we feel and the sadness. What do we even do? Khalistan is getting too political and we do not identify with violence, but freedom fighting and justice. We gave everyone their homes.. even the british... 20% of the British army in ww1 was Sikh...when will we get a home?
Not by India bro...sikh people or you can say almost all Sanatan Dharma followers are betrayed by the Congress party.
@@devhimanshu8728 it’s like saying Aurangzeb was bad but Muslims are good
no video on sikh genocide committed on much larger scale by pakistani muslims in 1947 ???? you were driven out of lahore and nankana sahib (your holiest shrine). scared to point that out ?
@ Fear and Sikh cannot be in the same phraseology
Yes I remember 1984 Sikh Genocide for Indira Gandhi congress 😢
We hindus were no different from pandavs during draupati cheerharan we betrayed and ran like sheep when our frontier warrior brother needed us most
What are you talking about? Sikhs were taught gatka from Rathore Rajputs Hindus
@@sol90981 Yes, this is true , but these Rajputs helped train the Gurus army as a gratitude to Shri Guru Har Gobind ji who secured the release of 52 kings from the Mughal 's Gwalior fort. (Sikhs celebrate this day) I would say he is talking about helping the Sikhs who were trying to defend invasions from the Afghans.
@@kidkully No, the Rathore Rajputs did not teach Gatka to Sikhs, Guru Hargobind, the first Sikh guru to engage in warfare, is credited with establishing Gatka, a martial art form that originated in Punjab in the 15th century
@@kidkully The relationship between the Rajputs and Sikhs is complex. While the Rajputs were known for their martial traditions and warrior culture, the Sikhs developed their own distinct identity and military prowess over time, particularly during the 17th and 18th centuries
@@mrluciferlucerna According to the Sikhan di Bhagat Ratan Mala, written in the 17th century, Guru Hargobind, the sixth Sikh Guru, was taught Shastravidya (the science of weapons) by two Rajput Hindus named Rao Sigara and Rao Jaita. Guru Gobind Singh, the tenth and last Sikh Guru, was also taught Shastravidya by a Rajput Hindu named Rao Bajjar Singh Rathore, who was the great-grandson of Rao Mandan Ji Rathore. Later, Guru Gobind Singh’s children were taught by Rai Alam Singh Chauhan, who is still considered one of the finest generals to have ever led Sikhs. Rai Alam Singh also never converted to Sikhism and Banda Singh Bahadur arguably the fiercest Sikh Warrior ever was also born a Hindu Rajput from Manhas clan of present day Jammu
I feel very disturbed & bad for what evil cruelty happened with our Sikhs brothers & sisters in 84, and Punjabi Hindus too. Congress did something really evil cruel to the Sikhs, and to it's reaction, some "extremists" were borned, who then reciprocated that on some Punjabi Hindus. This political party Congress back then literally played dirty politics through, and to appease Sikhs, Sonia Gandhi made a Sikh PM, insulted our PM Shri Manmohan Singh, to show her power games. I hope with time, upcoming generations should remain away from hate
Waheguruji Da Khalsa ❤❤
Waheguruji Di Fateh ❤❤
Jai Shree Ram
upcoming generations are very much in love with the hate
whatever congress did blatantly back in the day, BJP is doing very efficiently today
all political parties are Evil
when indra ghandi son vebecame primeminister after her mothers assisnation. Tamils killed him. Not a single tamil was killed in india why?
You lie. If Congress was appeasing Sikhs then how Indira attacked Darbar Sahib? It is only anti Indira RSS and BJP propaganda. Read the book by LK Advani (his autobiography) He clearly wrote that they forced Indira to wipe out Sikhs. So honestly at that time no Hindu was in support of Sikhs except Late PM of India Sh. Chandershekhar. I was young lawyer of 30 yrs in 84 and remember he was only one voice to say, Indira did wrong. We Sikhs have not forgotten atrocities of Aurangzeb, Suba Sarhind for killing of younger sons of Guru Gobind Singh ji or Abdali for ghallughara and same way our generations will remember the genocide of Sikhs in 1984.
We Sikhs have fogotten Aurangzeb, Abdali or Suba Sirhind so far atrocities. Same way, We can not forget 84 genocide of Sikhs. I was not Indira or Congress alone. Read autobiography of L K Advani where he clearly wrote that they forced Indira to attack Darbar Sahib. RSS also played anti Sikh propaganda since 1947 and even before that. Why no Marhatta Brahmin was touched when your so called father of nation was murdered or no Tamil was touched when Rajiv Gandhi was blown to pieces. Because, killed and killers were both Hindus. (sorry to say so bluntly but it is hard truth) Indira was not a bigger leader than Mahtma Gandhi. Time will come.
Hindus included RSS followers are never told to hate SIkhs
Canada ❤ i you love in sikh❤❤
Congress party did the massacre of Sikhs in India but irony is the same party won in Punjab and Delhi where Sikhs lives in big numbers numerous times post 1984 and even in 2024 they have won many seats . No one talks about Innocent Hindus butchered by Sikh terrorist just because of their religion. They had no hand in 1984 golden temple bloodshed or Delhi riots . Justice is pending for both Sikhs and Hindus. Hopefully Tytler one of the accused is in Jail with no let out under current government.
Bjp and rss were also involved
@@Arnold_Thelegend proof it. Congress leader are in jail or on bail. Which one in RSS or BJP were involved? Answer is zero. RSS only problem is they call Sikhs as part of Hindus which Sikh don’t like otherwise they have nothing against Sikhs . Stop spreading lies.
Both your mother bharat mata (bjp) jsn sang and congress did genocide of Sikhs
Lol same typical Congress blaming. Sikhs boycotted the elections while Hindus voted for congress. Also bjp where the ones protesting that they would smoke cigarettes around Amritsar when Sikhs banned them
Bjp, congress and rss were all involved in 1984 massacre, the reason why Congress won this time's election are because they are the lesser evil than aap and bjp currently. We have seen what aap has done to panjab in bhagwant Mann's time and what bjp has done to farmers, voting for Congress would be the least harmful for Panjab, if there were more competent people like Bhai Amritpal Singh and Bhai Sarabjeet Singh Congress wouldn't have gotten a single seat.
I'm non Indian, non Sikh, has hindu lineage but became a humanitarian religionist since late70-80s here in Cda, only read the Real Details about India's 1984 riots some 5-10 yrs ago after visiting few Gurduwaras in Mississauga/Brampton etc, then some UA-cam vlogs & google search etc. Now my believe is that I.Gandhi's Gov could've & should've tacled the Amristrar rebellious Sikhs incident much differently,
Like sending in 95% non violent Sikh army specialist only with minimal guns etc & only to pecefully arrest the rebels, instead of all the tear gases, shootings, blood sheds etc actions happened inside this very Revered Holy Temple,... then I.Gandi would've been alive, there would've been No Riots, etc, etc.
Just as there have been at least 2-3 Sikh PMs/ Janathypathy etc since 1984s time, And its time there ought to be less demands etc of separation. Not to forget the Sikh Religion primarily formed to repel the regular repeated attack & invasion attempts of Moguls etc Islamic forces, & that were successfully defended & most of Sikhs & Punjab stayed in tact compare to Bengal, Gujarat, Delhi, etc. If I'm not mistaken.
Khalistanis and Sikhs are different, Khalistanis are mostly in Trudeau and jagmeets Canada not India anymore. Even Hindus have been in Punjab for over 5000 years and various dynasties. Sikhi is an extension of Vedic philosophy from 5000 years in a 500 year reiteration. What happened in 84 was militants with weapons from Pak and China taking a holy place of worship hostage forcing the army action. Did congress and the gandhis mishandle, yes bjp says that loudest then anyone today.
Mughals were a mercenary force who were regularly employed by the Byzantine empire (Roman ) they hijacked Islam like Constantine hijacked Christianity and made laws to persecute non Christians or Christians who didn't follow their interpretations
Guru Nanak knew this , hence was against forced conversions , circumcision, etc etc why ? Because non of these " requirements " are in the Quran ,, so he worked out the Mughals were fake Muslims ,,, because in his biography he Say's himself whoever is behaving like Muhammad is a true Muslim ,,, so obviously they were not behaving like they should of and he must of known the biography of Muhammad to make that statement and many Sikh people don't know this but Guru Nanak was unalived ,, by certain people who didn't like his interpretation of in my opinion the Quran itself ,,, he understood the Quran better than most Muslims ,,,
@nnes759 Agree with some and disagree with others.
So my comments not showing in response to some comments here
How old is this video ?
1986
As Hindu From Maharashtra my heart goes down whenever I hear 1984, I know the pain cannot go by words but I Apologize to Everyone going through this pain if it makes any difference😔. But I would also pay my condolences to all Hindu Sikh Families in panjab Haryana Delhi Who lost their Loved ones in Panjab insurgency 🙏🙏🙏
Khalistanis and Sikhs are different, Khalistanis are mostly in Trudeau and jagmeets Canada not India anymore. Even Hindus have been in Punjab for over 5000 years and various dynasties. Sikhi is an extension of Vedic philosophy from 5000 years in a 500 year reiteration. What happened in 84 was militants with weapons from Pak and China taking a holy place of worship hostage forcing the army action. Did congress and the gandhis mishandle, yes bjp says that loudest then anyone today.
@@Supremeleaderkimjongun0 The mishandling of the rights of sikhs, and the Ideological war of forcing us into the hindu title is exactly why these "militants" picked up arms in the first place. They tried covering up the genocide as much as possible, but had to eventually accept history. ofc they would condemn it now.
@@Supremeleaderkimjongun0 Sikhism has nothing to do with Veda. It's a separate identity.
So terrorists occupying and misusing the Golden Temple is not wrong, but the Indian army's entry into the temple in order to liberate it from the clutches of those terrorists in wrong.
know the history son. Read some books on the topic of the writers of that time, then debate.
❤❤
🙏🙏
And of course bhindrawala is not responsible at all.
@kuldeepsingh Yes he was very innocent saint. That's why some Sikhs worship him.
@ssimba2785 neah. He wasn't even a sikh. He was nowhere near the ideology of guru granth sahib.
Everything is 20/20 in hindsight. Like saying Bush/ America should not have invaded Iraq/ Afghanistan after 9/11 causing greatest human tragedy which is even continuing today. Indra did what should be done at that time.
So in 1984 they learned how bad hindus are and they got fruit of what they did with muslims of their towns villages of tehir own punjabi people in 1947...we will forgive but never forget
Sidhu moosewala 😢
1984 was really sad but why did it happen? 1) score settling by local Congress people ( not RSS Hindus) and 2) some general mob anger.. because of assassination of the PM ( not Hindu PM but THE PM ) ,, why was Indiarji killed because she took a strong stand against the terrorist who had Hijacked the Golden Temple,, and before that all the Khalistani terror including bombing of Kanishka .... Majority of Hindus always respected Sikhs and always will because they are blood brothers ( remember SIkhs and Hindus both suffered during partition) But now days Hindus had enough of this hatred thrown by the Khalistanis
no video on sikh genocide committed on much larger scale by pakistani muslims in 1947 ???? you were driven out of lahore and nankana sahib (your holiest shrine). scared to point that out ?
That was not an attack on golden Temple but on a terrorist hiding inside like a rat, and was not ready to come after multiple requests and warnings from govt so army had to go in
It wasnt necessary. They couldve got him another way.
that terrorist surrendered a year before and was released because of no evidence against him...,no terrorist holds open conferences where anyone is welcome without frisking..,he was labeled terrorist by the sold out media of the government,if he was a rat he should have ran out at the first sound of tanks like many other people who left the grounds through secret ways and lived to tell the tale but he was a warrior who there to sacrifice himself for the honor of sikh faith..,Now obviously you are an ignorant idiot and stupid enough that you cant recognize the difference between modern and medieval combat.., now in modern times soldiers have to take cover and fire just like a shield and sword shield to protect sword to attack...,He was an honorable warrior who wouldnt come out hands up like a chicken instead he chose to die like a lion so as to uphold the image of khalsa panth
They could have arrested him peacefully
But they attacked our akal takht sahib is that you call justice? If same thing happen to your ram mandir you will say same
@@Dhaliwalz69 ya the govt did it on purpose too..to show the sikhs.
@@Dhaliwalz69 he was not ready to get arrested he had picked up arms Against govt, how could one arrest him, A S atwal was shot dead for even discussing his arrest. And attack on ram mandir has already happened, Hindus are not terrorists like khalistani that they will hide in ram mandir with weapons inside our temple, we care for temples unlike bhindrawala
Punjab is not fit for sikhs their numbers are diminishing in punjab 200,000 youth leave punjab for canada alone
because Kstan is going to happen in Brampton
Brampton and Surrey will become Khalistan
@@Superman-fl5sz almost there inshallah nanak TAKBIR
Also air India kanishka flight was blasted by Sikh terror groups in 1985 above Ireland killing 300 plus innocents 😢
It's by radical indians to defame These khalastanis
That is what he started off the video with.
It was India that blew up the air India to frame Sikhs, diplomats were kicked out their closest friends canceled the flights last minute
Hindus did Gujrat genocide killed 10 thousand innocent people
Samjhauta Express bombing, Ajmer Sharif bombing, we can also go on and on about the all sides. If you label a terrorist attack as done by Sikhs then also label the 1984 genocide against Sikhs as done by Hindus. Because if you use religion as the identity then you can’t pick and choose.
🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️
Indias shame.
Congress's shame
@@jiti5034 Not only congress, all Indian parties, celebrities and Indian citizens have blood on their hands.
@@luisluis5306 Oh really and what about the blood on hand of those Sikhs ( not all ) who did terrorist activities before operation blue star, killing both innocent Hindus and SIkhs also
they are a majority now !!!
ye to galat hua tha
How would Canada feel if India starts supporting the french Canadians for their independence from Elglish speaking Canada
Have heard horrific tales of Bindrawala and the terrorists housed in the Golden temple ? How is it that this issue was not addressed ? They tarnished the sanctity of the Golden temple with their atrocious acts.
@@cg5611 what terrorists? So now everyone that carries a weapon is a terrorist? What about those selfish Hindus that killed thousands and thousands of innocent Sikh men, raped Sikh women, and snatched away Sikh children? Bhindrawale was not a terrorist. In fact, he was a hero for some Hindu girls, as he married them without asking for dowry. Do not blindly call Sikhs terrorists. They were not hiding in the temple, as they eventually walked out, leading to the shooting of Bhindrawale. Secondly, if there was no shooting happened by the Sikhs, then you cannot call them terrorist. Have some common sense.
Good documentry @bhaikhel
Fake
no video on sikh genocide committed on much larger scale by pakistani muslims in 1947 ???? you were driven out of lahore and nankana sahib (your holiest shrine). scared to point that out ?