Ok, I have had a few questions for a that I can't get answered: First, how it adapted so quickly started spreading person to person ,now I'm convinced it was done in a lab. The second is, What other easily transmitted diseases, involes an "Asymmetric" Infections??? I know that Carriers infect others without ever becoming ill, but I also know it's a Life Long condition, and usually Bacterial, so 🤷♀️ Third, why did the cdc suddenly and quietly change the definition of a "VACCINE"????🙄😒 Regarding mrna crap, why was the public not told in the beginning that a "new technology" ,that scientists had been working on for "over a decade" ,could possibly be adapted for a "vaccine" very quickly, "scientists will be working diligently to determine if it can be done" If in fact it was actually true??????😡😡😡
There are actually indications on the genome of engineering. It was the insertion of the furin cleavage site that originally caught the eye of virologists. They were saying things like they see no way this exact insertion could happen in nature, but it would be easy to do in a lab. That sequence is described in a 2018 proposal from that Wuhan lab, its inserted in the place the proposal says the intend to put it. Additionally, when a virus is manipulated to make it easier to mix and match portions of other virus genomes it leaves tell-tale marks that are used by enzymes to slice and dice the genome. SARS-CoV-2 has these marks. They cut the genome into the number of pieces that they said they would in the aforementioned proposal. 55:16 Greg has it backwards, most of the public understands the virus was a from a lab. It's more people that have skin in the virology game that don't want to believe that a horrible accident of science killed millions of people and that their public health heroes lied to them.
What animal and from where? The reality is that various peer-reviewed papers have shown the Huanan Seafood Market origin theory is unsupported. Jesse Bloom actually found a negative correlation with susceptible animals and SARS-COV-2 genetic material. Michael Weissman has shown the early case data was biased towards the market area. Something George Gao acknowledged to the BBC last year. Ultimately, the nearest relatives to SARS-CoV-2 are found in Yunnan and Laos. That is ~1500km away from Wuhan. The most parsimonious explanation for why it broke out in Wuhan is WIV's sampling history for sarbecoviruses in those locations. They have refused to share their records with the NIH or WHO which is still calling for this data to be shared.
There is no evidence for a zoonotic origin of sars-cov-2. We might well find the animal reservoir, but there are many peculiar aspects to this disease beginning with the very unusual genetic mutation in the spike protein.
You don't think a 2018 proposal from that Chinese lab saying they were going to make this kind of virus is any kind of evidence? Where is your zoonotic evidence?
Ok, I have had a few questions for a that I can't get answered:
First, how it adapted so quickly started spreading person to person ,now I'm convinced it was done in a lab.
The second is, What other easily transmitted diseases, involes an "Asymmetric"
Infections???
I know that Carriers infect others without ever becoming ill, but I also know it's a Life Long condition, and usually Bacterial, so 🤷♀️
Third, why did the cdc suddenly and quietly change the definition of a "VACCINE"????🙄😒
Regarding mrna crap, why was the public not told in the beginning that a "new technology" ,that scientists had been working on for "over a decade" ,could possibly be adapted for a "vaccine" very quickly, "scientists will be working diligently to determine if it can be done" If in fact it was actually true??????😡😡😡
There are actually indications on the genome of engineering. It was the insertion of the furin cleavage site that originally caught the eye of virologists. They were saying things like they see no way this exact insertion could happen in nature, but it would be easy to do in a lab. That sequence is described in a 2018 proposal from that Wuhan lab, its inserted in the place the proposal says the intend to put it. Additionally, when a virus is manipulated to make it easier to mix and match portions of other virus genomes it leaves tell-tale marks that are used by enzymes to slice and dice the genome. SARS-CoV-2 has these marks. They cut the genome into the number of pieces that they said they would in the aforementioned proposal.
55:16 Greg has it backwards, most of the public understands the virus was a from a lab. It's more people that have skin in the virology game that don't want to believe that a horrible accident of science killed millions of people and that their public health heroes lied to them.
This is such a limited hangout 😂
Alina Chan is wrong at this point. No evidence backs her points about the origin. So far the zoonotic origin is valid.
What animal and from where? The reality is that various peer-reviewed papers have shown the Huanan Seafood Market origin theory is unsupported. Jesse Bloom actually found a negative correlation with susceptible animals and SARS-COV-2 genetic material. Michael Weissman has shown the early case data was biased towards the market area. Something George Gao acknowledged to the BBC last year.
Ultimately, the nearest relatives to SARS-CoV-2 are found in Yunnan and Laos. That is ~1500km away from Wuhan. The most parsimonious explanation for why it broke out in Wuhan is WIV's sampling history for sarbecoviruses in those locations. They have refused to share their records with the NIH or WHO which is still calling for this data to be shared.
There is no evidence for a zoonotic origin of sars-cov-2. We might well find the animal reservoir, but there are many peculiar aspects to this disease beginning with the very unusual genetic mutation in the spike protein.
You don't think a 2018 proposal from that Chinese lab saying they were going to make this kind of virus is any kind of evidence?
Where is your zoonotic evidence?