Here is the impression of the He 162 flown by Captain Eric Brown from "Wings of the Luftwaffe" ...the aircraft had excellent directional snaking characteristics making it a good gun platform. From this aspect it was the best jet fighter of it's time, and I was certainly in a position to judge, having flown every jet aircraft then in existence. A check on the rate of roll at 400 mph revealed the highest that I had ever experienced outside of the realm of hydraulically-powered ailerons, and the stick force demanded to produce these exhilarating gyrations was delightfully light. Leveling off at 12,000 feet I settled down to another spell of the pleasures of the phenomenal roll rate of this delightful little aeroplane ... I had never met better flying controls ... Even if somewhat underpowered it had a good performance - it could certainly have run rings around the contemporary Meteor. I was to fly the little aeroplane quite frequently.
I've read the above several times and all I can say is: Lucky, lucky bastard. A fascinating little aircraft. I suppose it's nippy handling with minimal control input is due to its very streamlined fuselage not at all draggy fuselage. A bit like the performance you might get if you took a sailplane, chopped of half it's wings and stuck a small turbojet on it. Bede BD5J inspiration?
Yes as a ten year old kid I built the Lindbergh 1/72nd. Scale kit HE 162 & wondered why would anyone build such a small low cost fighter and now I understand that...."when you ain't got nothing" u get creative 👍
For those interested the he 162 was able to get two kills both tempest Vs in May 1945 just before the war ended. One severe loss in action was when two he 162s were scrambled to intercept 8 tempest Vs strafing the airfield. The pilot in the he 162 tried to do an aggressive 360 turn and actually outturnwd the tempest but then the he 162 fell over lost power upside down and the pilot ejected himself at low altitude straight into the ground! Ouch!!!!
Got to study one close up back in the early ‘80s, I was serving in the R.A.F. and the base I was posted to had a small museum section, one of the exhibits was an He-162, I think it eventually ended up in the museum at Cosford.
I'm pretty sure that Salamander is now at Hendon, because it is the one missing it's ejector seat. I didn't nick it, did you? I was a 16 year old air cadet in 1984 and I remember looking at the cockpit instrumentation and thinking the gliders I'd just solo'ed had only slightly less instruments (fuel and engine data being the extra dials) The mad nazi plan was Hitler Youth could fly these planes. I think if I'd been a Nazi air cadet, and I've probably been up for it too! I loved the ATC and I particularly loved RAF St Athan Camp. Good food, good accommodation and flying and gliding until we were sick of it, and Tenby, The Welsh Ibiza down the road! I remember all the billet blocks had Welsh names too. And Nerys. A 16 yr old blonde pad brat with a lovely arse who I had a knee trembler with round the back of the NAAFI.
@@PORRRIDGE_GUN I worked part time on the Museum Flight back in the early eighties, I believe the collection was dispersed to other locations in the early nineties when they announced the closure of St Athan as an Air Force base, it was a unique collection, apart from the 162 they had a two seat Fw-190, a Japanese Ki-46 Dinah recce aircraft and WB188 the prototype Hunter that was later used to break the world air speed record.
I believe the slave labourer's building them used to piss in the glue pots which meant the glue never properly cured. Also the correct glue was unavailable as the Allies had bombed flat the only factory in Germany still producing it, Tego Film, made by Goldmann AG in 1943. The Heinkel had to use an inferior erzatz replacement. Ironically, the factory was target marked with flares dropped by De Haviland DH98 Mosquitos in one of the first Oboe-equipped blind bombing raids. The Mosquito was also built of plywood and glued together using Aerolite. a chemically similar glue.
As many have already said great video. IMO the only downer is the over powering music, which n places especially towards the end tended to drown out the commentary......
If you don't know about them, how can you say there are few of them. If you don't know about them, There could be hundreds. How would you know? Think about it.
Que tecnologia fantástica dos alemães isso a 80 anos atrás. Só perderam a guerra por falta de materiais belicos. Por que estavam 10 anos a frente dos aliados
Once upon a time (1991) I flew the He-162 Volksjaeger in LucasArts' "Secret Weapons of the Luftwaffe." As with previous LucasArts releases, "BattleHawks 1942" and "The Battle of Britain," the pixel-based aircraft and tracers left something to be desired. (The "IL-2 Sturmovik" series is many times better in detail and combat flight simulation, by comparison.) As the author has said, this aircraft was "too little, too late."
I had the Battlehawks and Battle of Britain games, and at the time the graphics were excellent. I never got the SWoL game because it was only issued on CD and I didn't have a CD-ROM at the time.
Aaaah......You bring back some fond memories for me. BOB and SWOTL were two of my favourite games to play, and they also had fantastic manuals, like small books. Graphics were par for the course at that time and very little in the way of visual scenery but they had great gameplay. I would frequently find myself flying the Me262 or the Gotha flying wing and yelling out “Gott Himmel, these Englanders fight like madmen!” The He162 must have been in the expansion pack that I didn’t have. Ah great times
Such a pretty plane and beautiful art work. Glad the Typhoon pilot survived. Pictures showing destroyed German aircraft poses the question, what happened to those incredible engines? How many were secreted away? I'd hate to think they went to scrap.
It was an aerodynamic masterpiece when the prototype did 562 mph it shocked luftwaffe officials and the second generation of 162's would have been dramatically better with swept wings and a v tail plus an engine (heinkel-hirth HS011) with 50% more power.
Well, since they actually managed to get some reliability out of the Jumo 004, i would say that the wings are the first to come of (well to be specific, they'll come of when you try an overenthusiastic roll maneuver ;D).
@@mandernachluca3774 looking at some of these aircraft on display now, some had quite a handful of flights which was to say some of the slave labor were being diligent with their job while others were purposely responsible for their crashes due to sabotage.
Actually, the Heinkel He-219 Uhu was first production aircraft to have ejection seats installed from it's introduction (from early1943 onwards) *and* used in combat. Going back even further still, we find the He-280 jet prototypes to be the very first pre-production aircraft made anywhere, of any quantity, to be fitted with an ejection seat. Cheers! PS: To the Video author: Cool video about an interesting airplane! :)
The Do335 never reached series production so the He162 was the first in service aircraft with an ejection seat. I can't remember exactly which one or ones (it should not be hard to look it up) but I do not think it was even the first development project to include an ejection seat. The Heinkel 219 Uhu springs to mind. Yee Haa
Also consider what would happen to the pilot if he ejected. Pop ... .and into the engine he goes. Sure, the explosive cartridge was supposed to thrust the pilot clear of the engine - but were there any lucky "volunteers" to test it in actual flight?
The He-162's cruising airspeed was 520 mph and a top speed of over 560 mph made the aircraft invulnerable to a rearward attack by any Allied fighters in service during WW2.
The Dornier Do335 had ejection seat..., was not built in the same numbers tho. I think Heinkel did have a headstart with 162 (Bfw did with the 109.., problably).
Cool! Thanks for this post . Did the German ever consider using hemp in the structures of their combat aircraft? I still dig the fact you could start a German turbojet with a pull cord like a lawn mower .
@@sandervanderkammen9230 None were electric start - they were all started with a petrol engine in the intake or compressed air. Electric starters weighed too much.
If you study the line-up of products that Heinkel offered, you have to wonder why they were overlooked. In most head-to-head matchups against Willy Messerschmidt, Heinkel was pushed out. Was it politics or simple performance. It's not perfectly clear; most competitors thought Messerschmidt had unfair advantages, yet he himself thought he'd been unappreciated. The Luftwaffe was a labyrinth of personalities, between Goering, Milch, Udet, etc.
And the UK used the cockpit and nose design of the He162 as a template for later development. (look at the nose of the Hawker Hunter and tell me they're not similar!)
Actually I wrote the comment attributed to my wife Ilse: The prizewinning novel "Das Fluessiges Land" by Raphaela Edelbauer (Klett Cotta) mentions the factory at Hinterbruehl. John Towler on his wife's computer.
I don't think the Germans were too late in introducing these jet fighters , even if they had used it earlier in the war , the Allied would have just improvised and copied them by introducing their own jet fighters, but imho this he 162 is not pretty to look at compared to me 262
The British test pilots comments make no sense at all if true. By saying this plane has the lightest most aerodynamically effective controls on any aircraft he has flown but it's difficult to handle is like saying this car has great power steering but it handles like a pice of crap. It sounds more like the designers made some technical breakthroughs with power assisted controls but the plane had major design flaws to me. Another WHAT IF the Germans did this video.
Some people would describe it as being to sensitive to control inputs. In that case you have at your command huge ranges of input that to a new pilot may be too much of a first powered aircraft. The tendency would be to over correct on adjustments to your flight attitudes which can result in exceeding the structural capabilities of the airframe. Nice way to say the dam thing falls apart in the air. Not a good . Hehehe. Would still love to fly one though.
It's amazing how all kinds of "documentaries" and "expert" commentary about the bombing of Germany as having done nothing strategically. Yet the Nazis devoted ALL kinds of energy into AA and fighter designs to deal with the threat. When they failed they lay prostrate and helpless to the ground onslaught that was the Allied victory. So it would be more than arguable to say that the Allied 24-hour bombing campaign was the first step towards total air superiority and the main step in crushing Nazi infrastructure.
@@tomryan914 Indeed, the MiG-15 was designed by Heinkel Gunter Seigfreid... And the efforts Messerschmitt's team brought over with Operation Paperclip and Operation Lusty is what made the F86 possible and formidable.
So joke at 2:40 showing a schollar glue bottle to fix certain issues at HE162 german jet planes but, the question is: the allies had at that war time a jet plane to counterpart these and other german geniouses enginnery machines, except of english Meteor, that their RAF command expressely prohibited their pilots to aproach to Me262 planes, the first operational jet fighter of all WWII ? And remembering that germans used Axial engines, not centrifugal ones...
Step away from the bong and try eating your meals instead of smoking them! Who had the first operational jet fighter during WWII? Hint: it wasn't the allies... Here is another one: the famous P51 wasn't the fastest piston driven aero plane during the Second World War. Hint: it was german piston driven aero plane
@@thedonofbgfmakoflatty172 And the German lost. The Luftwaffe was a spent force from early 1944 onwards. Logistics alone could not support the majority of units. Spares were not available in sufficient quantity and fuel, lubricants and pilots were in short supply.
![When The Luftwaffe Stuck Two Bombers Together | Heinkel He-111 Zwilling [Aircraft Overview #34]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/d1U0h_nAdIk/mqdefault.jpg)
Here is the impression of the He 162 flown by Captain Eric Brown from "Wings of the Luftwaffe"
...the aircraft had excellent directional snaking characteristics making it a good gun platform. From this aspect it was the best jet fighter of it's time, and I was certainly in a position to judge, having flown every jet aircraft then in existence. A check on the rate of roll at 400 mph revealed the highest that I had ever experienced outside of the realm of hydraulically-powered ailerons, and the stick force demanded to produce these exhilarating gyrations was delightfully light. Leveling off at 12,000 feet I settled down to another spell of the pleasures of the phenomenal roll rate of this delightful little aeroplane ... I had never met better flying controls ... Even if somewhat underpowered it had a good performance - it could certainly have run rings around the contemporary Meteor. I was to fly the little aeroplane quite frequently.
Imagine the effect this would have if it came out a few years earlier (after Stalingrad let's say)
@@arshdeepsinghmalhi4554 Nope.
I've read the above several times and all I can say is: Lucky, lucky bastard. A fascinating little aircraft. I suppose it's nippy handling with minimal control input is due to its very streamlined fuselage not at all draggy fuselage. A bit like the performance you might get if you took a sailplane, chopped of half it's wings and stuck a small turbojet on it. Bede BD5J inspiration?
Loved building this model as a kid. It just looks like a fighter.
Looks like a spaceship and I love it!
Yes as a ten year old kid I built the Lindbergh 1/72nd. Scale kit HE 162 & wondered why would anyone build such a small low cost fighter and now I understand that...."when you ain't got nothing" u get creative 👍
WE LOVE YOU HE 162!!!
For those interested the he 162 was able to get two kills both tempest Vs in May 1945 just before the war ended. One severe loss in action was when two he 162s were scrambled to intercept 8 tempest Vs strafing the airfield. The pilot in the he 162 tried to do an aggressive 360 turn and actually outturnwd the tempest but then the he 162 fell over lost power upside down and the pilot ejected himself at low altitude straight into the ground! Ouch!!!!
Forgotten...?!? By who...?!? Not by aviation aficionados...that's for sure...!!!
110%!
It's a testament to, not waste anything & use whatever you have to keep going....
My favorite 'axis' plane of all time. Such a unique design. Looks like a frog with a jetpack on it's back..
Probably, that's the reason why this plane other name was "Salamander", who knows...?!?
To me, it looks like a dolphin.
The sad thing is, that this german technological superiority was one of the major reasons for this war.
Same here I love the design.
Me 162 is nice. My favorite WWII
plane is the Me 262.
I allways loved this aircraft. Lets build a new flying one.
Even today it looks modern, and it went from drawing board to plane in 90 days i believe.
Got to study one close up back in the early ‘80s, I was serving in the R.A.F. and the base I was posted to had a small museum section, one of the exhibits was an He-162, I think it eventually ended up in the museum at Cosford.
St Athan?
@@PORRRIDGE_GUN Yes, the base had a small museum back in the seventies and eighties, it was an overspill for Hendon and Cosford.
I'm pretty sure that Salamander is now at Hendon, because it is the one missing it's ejector seat. I didn't nick it, did you?
I was a 16 year old air cadet in 1984 and I remember looking at the cockpit instrumentation and thinking the gliders I'd just solo'ed had only slightly less instruments (fuel and engine data being the extra dials)
The mad nazi plan was Hitler Youth could fly these planes. I think if I'd been a Nazi air cadet, and I've probably been up for it too!
I loved the ATC and I particularly loved RAF St Athan Camp. Good food, good accommodation and flying and gliding until we were sick of it, and Tenby, The Welsh Ibiza down the road! I remember all the billet blocks had Welsh names too. And Nerys. A 16 yr old blonde pad brat with a lovely arse who I had a knee trembler with round the back of the NAAFI.
@@PORRRIDGE_GUN I worked part time on the Museum Flight back in the early eighties, I believe the collection was dispersed to other locations in the early nineties when they announced the closure of St Athan as an Air Force base, it was a unique collection, apart from the 162 they had a two seat Fw-190, a Japanese Ki-46 Dinah recce aircraft and WB188 the prototype Hunter that was later used to break the world air speed record.
The lesson learned? Never use Elmer's glue on a jet.
I believe the slave labourer's building them used to piss in the glue pots which meant the glue never properly cured. Also the correct glue was unavailable as the Allies had bombed flat the only factory in Germany still producing it, Tego Film, made by Goldmann AG in 1943. The Heinkel had to use an inferior erzatz replacement. Ironically, the factory was target marked with flares dropped by De Haviland DH98 Mosquitos in one of the first Oboe-equipped blind bombing raids. The Mosquito was also built of plywood and glued together using Aerolite. a chemically similar glue.
As a kid in the 1960s I had plastic model of this plane. Loved it.
Lindbergh made a 1/72 model. Cost about 5 bucks in the late 70's.
Not forgotten. Never forgotten.
If the Henschel HeS 011 & HeS 012 engines hit mass production earlier, this aircraft could have become legendary.
I have a feeling Aeromodeller magazine published a piece about this plane complete with plan and elevation around 1947.
Amazing work on your videos man! Glad I found your channel, can't wait to see what the future holds!
As many have already said great video. IMO the only downer is the over powering music, which n places especially towards the end tended to drown out the commentary......
Forgotten? Nope not ever
Great video. One of the few german planes I actually didnt know about, so thank you for this video. Keep it up! :D
If you don't know about them, how can you say there are few of them. If you don't know about them, There could be hundreds. How would you know? Think about it.
Now it turns into a commercial jet aircraft like the Cirrus Vision, and Subsonex. All top mounted single tiny jet engine.
0:30 384th Bomber Group - Grafton Underwood "Keep the Show on the Road"
Que tecnologia fantástica dos alemães isso a 80 anos atrás.
Só perderam a guerra por falta de materiais belicos.
Por que estavam 10 anos a frente dos aliados
Once upon a time (1991) I flew the He-162 Volksjaeger in LucasArts' "Secret Weapons of the Luftwaffe." As with previous LucasArts releases, "BattleHawks 1942" and "The Battle of Britain," the pixel-based aircraft and tracers left something to be desired. (The "IL-2 Sturmovik" series is many times better in detail and combat flight simulation, by comparison.) As the author has said, this aircraft was "too little, too late."
I had the Battlehawks and Battle of Britain games, and at the time the graphics were excellent. I never got the SWoL game because it was only issued on CD and I didn't have a CD-ROM at the time.
Aaaah......You bring back some fond memories for me. BOB and SWOTL were two of my favourite games to play, and they also had fantastic manuals, like small books. Graphics were par for the course at that time and very little in the way of visual scenery but they had great gameplay. I would frequently find myself flying the Me262 or the Gotha flying wing and yelling out “Gott Himmel, these Englanders fight like madmen!”
The He162 must have been in the expansion pack that I didn’t have.
Ah great times
I knew about it. Thank your Gajin and WarThunder Dev team!
Incredible
I designed a 2m long flying model of the He-162. I have videos of it on my channel.
Such a pretty plane and beautiful art work. Glad the Typhoon pilot survived. Pictures showing destroyed German aircraft poses the question, what happened to those incredible engines? How many were secreted away? I'd hate to think they went to scrap.
Good video. background music was a bit loud.
It was an aerodynamic masterpiece when the prototype did 562 mph it shocked luftwaffe officials and the second generation of 162's would have been dramatically better with swept wings and a v tail plus an engine (heinkel-hirth HS011) with 50% more power.
Reminds me abit of the A-10
cool stuff
What happens first. Does your engine burn out or do your wings fall off?
Also, IIRC the Dornier Pfiel had the first ejection seats.
Nice video!
Well, since they actually managed to get some reliability out of the Jumo 004, i would say that the wings are the first to come of (well to be specific, they'll come of when you try an overenthusiastic roll maneuver ;D).
@@mandernachluca3774 looking at some of these aircraft on display now, some had quite a handful of flights which was to say some of the slave labor were being diligent with their job while others were purposely responsible for their crashes due to sabotage.
Yes the Do335 had the first fitted ejection seats - but the OP says the first ejection seats in combat. That might be right.
Actually, the Heinkel He-219 Uhu was first production aircraft to have ejection seats installed from it's introduction (from early1943 onwards) *and* used in combat.
Going back even further still, we find the He-280 jet prototypes to be the very first pre-production aircraft made anywhere, of any quantity, to be fitted with an ejection seat. Cheers!
PS: To the Video author: Cool video about an interesting airplane! :)
The Do335 never reached series production so the He162 was the first in service aircraft with an ejection seat. I can't remember exactly which one or ones (it should not be hard to look it up) but I do not think it was even the first development project to include an ejection seat. The Heinkel 219 Uhu springs to mind. Yee Haa
The Heinkel 219 Uhu night fighter had an ejection seat before the Salamander.
True !
Designed and built in less than 60 days ... try doing these days.... no way !
Give that task to Burt Ratain. He'll do it. By the time the DARPA project officer shows up, he'll have a flying prototype in the air.
Maybe we should have contracted Heinkel instead of Lockheed to tackle the Joint Strike Fighter Project... 60 days Vs. 10 years!
Maybe your right !
@@njsullyalex2744 without bucaneered german jet-technology there would be no Lockheed Martin.
@@hajoos.8360 That's a good point, all modern jet engines are based on the Jumo/BMW axial flow design!
Seems in air to air combat, rearward visibility was important. But with the engine placed where it was, that would be a problem. Check six!
Also consider what would happen to the pilot if he ejected. Pop ... .and into the engine he goes. Sure, the explosive cartridge was supposed to thrust the pilot clear of the engine - but were there any lucky "volunteers" to test it in actual flight?
The He-162's cruising airspeed was 520 mph and a top speed of over 560 mph made the aircraft invulnerable to a rearward attack by any Allied fighters in service during WW2.
Yes there was actually! Luckily pilots did eject and survived the ordeal.
Just ran across your channel and subscribed! Lots of good stuff!
The Dornier Do335 had ejection seat..., was not built in the same numbers tho.
I think Heinkel did have a headstart with 162 (Bfw did with the 109.., problably).
My favorite jet of WW2
Cool! Thanks for this post . Did the German ever consider using hemp in the structures of their combat aircraft? I still dig the fact you could start a German turbojet with a pull cord like a lawn mower .
Right On Brother! ua-cam.com/video/HJm_z_OhL4Y/v-deo.html
German jet engines had electric start, the pull start was just a auxcillery back up feature.
@@sandervanderkammen9230 None were electric start - they were all started with a petrol engine in the intake or compressed air. Electric starters weighed too much.
Push start!...Pull start!...Kick start!. (abbreviated racist joke)
I sure I read some where that for a short while after the war the French used some of them as a stop gap .
If you study the line-up of products that Heinkel offered, you have to wonder why they were overlooked. In most head-to-head matchups against Willy Messerschmidt, Heinkel was pushed out. Was it politics or simple performance. It's not perfectly clear; most competitors thought Messerschmidt had unfair advantages, yet he himself thought he'd been unappreciated. The Luftwaffe was a labyrinth of personalities, between Goering, Milch, Udet, etc.
Seems like it has similarities with the A10 Warthog. I wonder it there is any connection between the two designs?
Biber0315 simple answer, no.
Maybe German engineers in America? Idk
Post war American aircraft design was heavily influenced amd dominated by both Operations Lusty and Paper Clip.
Maybe because it was captured?
German glue technology was put back, because their best glue factory was destroyed in a bombing raid. The factory wasn't even the intended target.
Was not the He219 owl the first operational plane with ejections seats?
I believe you are correct
And the UK used the cockpit and nose design of the He162 as a template for later development. (look at the nose of the Hawker Hunter and tell me they're not similar!)
So this is the first aircraft that had an ejection seat? It should have been the last. You eject and get sucked right into the jet engine!
Not to get sucked into the engine this aircraft got the ejection seat.
So what is the point ?
Actually it was the he 219 to be the first with an ejection seat in combat
Built a jet with wood and glue... wow they were REALLY short on supplies
Actually I wrote the comment attributed to my wife Ilse: The prizewinning novel "Das Fluessiges Land" by Raphaela Edelbauer (Klett Cotta) mentions the factory at Hinterbruehl. John Towler on his wife's computer.
Salemander is wrong name. He 162 "Spatz"
I don't think the Germans were too late in introducing these jet fighters , even if they had used it earlier in the war , the Allied would have just improvised and copied them by introducing their own jet fighters, but imho this he 162 is not pretty to look at compared to me 262
The allied approach to this problem would be to ship ten times as much war material over the Atlantic and sacrifice ten times as many US sons !
The British test pilots comments make no sense at all if true. By saying this plane has the lightest most aerodynamically effective controls on any aircraft he has flown but it's difficult to handle is like saying this car has great power steering but it handles like a pice of crap. It sounds more like the designers made some technical breakthroughs with power assisted controls but the plane had major design flaws to me. Another WHAT IF the Germans did this video.
Some people would describe it as being to sensitive to control inputs. In that case you have at your command huge ranges of input that to a new pilot may be too much of a first powered aircraft. The tendency would be to over correct on adjustments to your flight attitudes which can result in exceeding the structural capabilities of the airframe. Nice way to say the dam thing falls apart in the air. Not a good . Hehehe. Would still love to fly one though.
Read Eric Brown's book on flying captured German aircraft to get more than a sound bite.
Great vid!
music becomes too loud towards the end, drowns the voice
best,not forgotten,never!!
slave labor pissed in the glue!
What would you had done against those rogue-invaders?
Forgotten? Not by aviation buffs.
Fastest jet in IL-2 1946 sim.
in il-2 1964 the fastest jet is the me-163 not the he 162
@@flak8842 The Me-163 is NOT a jet, but a ROCKET powered fighter!
I always thought that the claimed kill was never confirmed.
Look a bit like A10 warthog
This is not a forgotten aircraft......
It's amazing how all kinds of "documentaries" and "expert" commentary about the bombing of Germany as having done nothing strategically. Yet the Nazis devoted ALL kinds of energy into AA and fighter designs to deal with the threat. When they failed they lay prostrate and helpless to the ground onslaught that was the Allied victory. So it would be more than arguable to say that the Allied 24-hour bombing campaign was the first step towards total air superiority and the main step in crushing Nazi infrastructure.
This Design is not even close to the best German jet fighters in the late War, so it would be replaced very soon if possible.
Indeed, German second generation jet aircraft designs like the MiG 15 and F-86 were vastly superior.
@@sandervanderkammen9230 "Dah" and "You Betcha!"
@@tomryan914 Indeed, the MiG-15 was designed by Heinkel Gunter Seigfreid...
And the efforts Messerschmitt's team brought over with Operation Paperclip and Operation Lusty is what made the F86 possible and formidable.
0:00 my computer fans when i run minecraft rtx
Wartime history forgotten aircraft he162. War thunder players. Umm excuse us but we remember it and like our little salamander
I would like to hear this comment in german language. Thanks.
So joke at 2:40 showing a schollar glue bottle to fix certain issues at HE162 german jet planes but, the question is: the allies had at that war time a jet plane to counterpart these and other german geniouses enginnery machines, except of english Meteor, that their RAF command expressely prohibited their pilots to aproach to Me262 planes, the first operational jet fighter of all WWII ? And remembering that germans used Axial engines, not centrifugal ones...
Step away from the bong and try eating your meals instead of smoking them!
Who had the first operational jet fighter during WWII?
Hint: it wasn't the allies...
Here is another one: the famous P51 wasn't the fastest piston driven aero plane during the Second World War.
Hint: it was german piston driven aero plane
@@thedonofbgfmakoflatty172 And the German lost. The Luftwaffe was a spent force from early 1944 onwards. Logistics alone could not support the majority of units. Spares were not available in sufficient quantity and fuel, lubricants and pilots were in short supply.
Heinkel had a jet in 1941, luckily the nazis ignored him.
Great invention, until the ejection seat invented & pilot sucked straight into the turbine