God: The First Mover

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 тра 2024
  • A twist on the Kalam, the universe exists therefore someone created it.
    This clip is from Talk Heathen, Episode 08.19 for May 12, 2024 with Jamie The Blind Limey and Richard Gilliver!
    See the full episode: • Honor Your Parents, Ha...
    Call the show on Sundays 1:00pm-2:00pm CDT: 1-512-991-9242
    Don't like commercials? Become a patron & get ad-free episodes & more: / talkheathentome
    ► Find all of our links here: linktr.ee/atheistcommunityofa...
    The podcast may be found at:
    tiny.cc/podcastph
    Talk Heathen merch can be found at: tiny.cc/merchaca
    Note: We request pronouns as part of the call screening process on our shows, and we display the pronouns our callers provide. If you see a caller with no pronouns indicated, this is because they chose not to provide us with any, and we respect that decision.
    -------
    WHAT IS TALK HEATHEN?
    Talk Heathen is a weekly call-in television show in Austin, Texas geared toward long-form and on-going dialogue with theists & atheists about religion, theism, & secularism. Talk Heathen is produced by the Atheist Community of Austin.
    Talk Heathen is filmed in front of a live studio audience every week at the Freethought Library of the Atheist Community of Austin.
    The Atheist Community of Austin is organized as a nonprofit educational corporation to develop & support the atheist community, to provide opportunities for socializing & friendship, to promote secular viewpoints, to encourage positive atheist culture, to defend the first amendment principle of government-religion separation, to oppose discrimination against atheists & to work with other organizations in pursuit of common goals.
    We define atheism as the lack of belief in gods. This definition also encompasses what most people call agnosticism.
    NOTES
    The views and opinions expressed by hosts, guests, or callers are their own and not necessarily representative of the Atheist Community of Austin.
    / talkheathen is the official channel of Talk Heathen. "Talk Heathen" is a trademark of the ACA.
    Copyright © 2024 Atheist Community of Austin. All rights reserved.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 32

  • @hank_says_things
    @hank_says_things 14 днів тому +7

    "Everything needs a creator and everything that moves ultimately needs a first mover and a creator except for my guy. It's Logic™️ and not special pleading at all"

  • @BaronVonQuiply
    @BaronVonQuiply 14 днів тому +5

    Amazon should start a Moving company and call it *_Prime Movers_*

  • @NiltonVolpato
    @NiltonVolpato 12 днів тому +1

    The universe didn't have to have a beginning

  • @celiand2618
    @celiand2618 14 днів тому +2

    Have those theists never thought that the initiation of the first move, the prime mover event, could be the death of the god ?
    They should consider it. Seriously. Because that is such an evident idea that it was in the texts that influenced Genesis.

  • @pencilpauli9442
    @pencilpauli9442 14 днів тому +5

    Of course God was the first mover. Before Him, no one else had got up and danced (presumably to the music of the spheres)
    Maybe he danced rings around Saturn.
    Being the father, he was dad dancing, of course, moves as tired and hackneyed as the same old arguments dragged out of the past by apologists.

    • @BaronVonQuiply
      @BaronVonQuiply 14 днів тому +3

      _"Oh my mortals.... Yahweh is... is he doing The Robot?"_

  • @JohnSpencer90
    @JohnSpencer90 13 днів тому +1

    This caller posed a question, but his thoughts and conclusions were not well-structured.
    Even though we lack empirical evidence for events at the beginning of the universe (t=0), we can at least agree that something caused it to come into existence. Abstract concepts like these are often explored through philosophical arguments.
    If we accept that something caused the universe's existence, we're left with two possibilities: intentional or non-intentional causation. Christians attribute the cause to God, suggesting intentional design. However, making this claim is pre-mature, as the universe could have emerged from a non-intentional cause.

  • @capthavic
    @capthavic 13 днів тому

    Why is it so hard for people to say three simple words: "I dont know"

  • @jdtown6585
    @jdtown6585 14 днів тому +1

    At the end of the call it was clear the caller wasn't listening like he should, or he's so indoctrinated he can't fathom the thought his god may not exist.

    • @thetruefirelord2248
      @thetruefirelord2248 13 днів тому

      I think the opposite happened. I think I was confronted and genuinely listened to what they were say, (and more importantly) understood what they were saying.
      I think that freaked him out so he hung up

  • @graemerose1616
    @graemerose1616 14 днів тому

    If using the Jewish / Christian bible as a date / time scale and God being theignition, then factr in Shaman burials that predate that creation and homoerectus entering into what is now Russua. Then reconsider.

  • @thetruefirelord2248
    @thetruefirelord2248 13 днів тому

    I wish thry asked him how he knows his god wasn’t a 'demon' pretending to be a false god

  • @leongkhengneoh6581
    @leongkhengneoh6581 14 днів тому

    My god is the real god but other people gods are demons argument never failed

  • @dimitrioskalfakis
    @dimitrioskalfakis 14 днів тому +2

    leave cosmology to astrophysicists or become one and ask questions with a different framework other than bronze age goat herders.

  • @Phylaetra
    @Phylaetra 14 днів тому

    The unmoved mover - isn't that Aisling Bea? She says she won't even go see sad movies in case she is moved. She wanted to do her set sitting down, but then it couldn't legally be called 'standup' - heyooo!
    More seriously - why does there need to be an 'unmoved mover'? If there is one, why can't there be two? Or any finite number? If there were (at least) one, how do you know it still exists? How do you know it is a being of the type you call a 'god'? How do you know what other properties it had, or has (if it still exists)?
    'Unmoved mover' doesn't actually give you _anything_. And that's even _assuming_ that it exists in the first place, since it very well might _not_.

  • @thetruefirelord2248
    @thetruefirelord2248 13 днів тому

    Every theist believes they are correct. And every theist believe that theist from other religious are wrong.

  • @Ghalaghor_McAllistor
    @Ghalaghor_McAllistor 14 днів тому +4

    If a creation requires a creator, movement a mover, then what created the creator? Something can't come from nothing, except god because a universe could never have always existed. Just look at the trees!

    • @brucebaker810
      @brucebaker810 14 днів тому +4

      Creator implies a Creatorer.
      Creatorer implies Creatorest.

    • @Boneworm852
      @Boneworm852 14 днів тому

      ​@@brucebaker810Creat're'll'd've

    • @Finckelstein
      @Finckelstein 14 днів тому +3

      Here's where they inject their special pleading. "God always existed outside of time and space! Because I said so!"

  • @Byorin
    @Byorin 14 днів тому

    Matt sounds really different here.
    Not sure if it’s my audio or he’s learning a new accent.

    • @CycocelVocalist
      @CycocelVocalist 14 днів тому +1

      can't tell if satire or genuine lol

    • @Byorin
      @Byorin 14 днів тому

      @@CycocelVocalisthaha, im just messing with them. Am actually a big fan of the hosts 😂

  • @SecondaryHomunculus
    @SecondaryHomunculus 14 днів тому +2

    I am an unmoved listener, Ulrich. Do better.

  • @ObservantHistorian
    @ObservantHistorian 13 днів тому

    Again with this word "god." Given the thousands of mutually-incompatible gods proposed over human history, the word has no meaning. It's whatever a believer wants to say it is, and few of them agree with each in all particulars, even if of the same congregation of the same sect of the same religion. The onus should ALWAYS be placed on the apologist to persuade the hundreds of millions of religious people who don't agree with them, before trying to convince the atheist to agree with their personal delusions.

  • @ericcraig3875
    @ericcraig3875 14 днів тому +1

    UA-cam Atheists still don't know what "Big Bangs" are.

    • @exceptionallyaverage3075
      @exceptionallyaverage3075 13 днів тому

      How do you know? Did you ask all of them?

    • @ojrmk1
      @ojrmk1 10 днів тому

      Something something your mum last night something something.

  • @richardbennett9700
    @richardbennett9700 13 днів тому

    The negation of the kalam is physics. Physics doesn't require magic or magical thinking. The kalam does require magic or magical thinking. Physics is real. Magic isn't real.