Oh ok, you're one of my fans, thank you for spending your time to watch all my 10 matches, I hope you enjoed them 😊 (Judges were from different Europe countries)
Gran bella lista! Abbiamo lo stesso set-up di mostri ( eccetto secutor che non lo gioco)e son contento di poter verificare che esso può effettivamente funzionare! Gran bella lista!
the thing that really gets me thinking is that it's obvious that everyone is talking about the machine control player, he was the only player I had problems with in the 8 rounds. the most curious thing is that precisely because of the decision of an Italian judge, I lost a game against him even though I was right on the ruling. I also appealed to the head judge who also gave me a negative answer even though I was right on the ruling. in the end I won 2 to 1 even though I was right about the ruling. in practice I would have won 3-0 against him. I don't even know why everyone is talking about him. we wouldn't have reached the end of time if they hadn't given me a wrong ruling. I would have won 2-0 very quickly. at the end of the match the 2 judges came to apologize to me for having made the mistake with the ruling.
@ gb monster + test Tiger , summon darius from deck, active eff for summon gyzarus from grave, when gyza come to field active eff and declare The 2 targets, in chain book of moon for set the darius. in this mode gyza cant be negated because darius its not face up. so gyza resolve. judge and head judge say: if the monster come to the field its negated. obv its not negated bacause darius its not more face up
i actually heard the worst about this glad beast guy. he was allegedly stalling in each of his rounds and was all around what the yugioh community didnt need like ever. Wasnt there myself to verify though
the thing that really gets me thinking is that it's obvious that everyone is talking about the machine control player, he was the only player I had problems with in the 8 rounds. the most curious thing is that precisely because of the decision of an Italian judge, I lost a game against him even though I was right on the ruling. I also appealed to the head judge who also gave me a negative answer even though I was right on the ruling. in the end I won 2 to 1 even though I was right about the ruling. in practice I would have won 3-0 against him. I don't even know why everyone is talking about him. we wouldn't have reached the end of time if they hadn't given me a wrong ruling. I would have won 2-0 very quickly. at the end of the match the 2 judges came to apologize to me for having made the mistake with the ruling.
No brain/mindcon and he already maxed out all the other extra deck cards he could possibly summon so it's 3 "free" slots. If you play less than 15 you are giving information away for free to your oppornent.
His explanations on siding patterns are amazing thanks
Good job - congrats on the top! Nice video and interview.
Ty boss
Good questions asked in this interview. Especially about side pattern. Keep it up.
@@murkdd Thanks, appreciate it 🙏
Gladiator Beast best deck let’s go!
In this deck there's a lot of cards so much important
For me!
Grande Mozzo 🔥
i really liked his explanations / ratios, good profile
@@erkamyilmaz8938 Thanks 😊
Best staller I ever seen in my life..with 2 Italian judges above his head and they didn't even warned him
Thank you so much for our match, you played very well
See you 😊
@@ilmozzo1676 lol I'm not the player you faced I'm just a watcher of this idiotic game
@@ilmozzo1676I'm not the guy you faced,I'm just a watcher of all of them seeing this unfair Italian plays from you and from the judges
Oh ok, you're one of my fans, thank you for spending your time to watch all my 10 matches, I hope you enjoed them 😊
(Judges were from different Europe countries)
@@ilmozzo1676 don't be mad because you didn't deserve it my friend.ciao belle
Gran bella lista! Abbiamo lo stesso set-up di mostri ( eccetto secutor che non lo gioco)e son contento di poter verificare che esso può effettivamente funzionare! Gran bella lista!
Does anybody know if there are videos of his matches? I'd really like to see some gameplay
256 players?? damn!!! For context: That's more than several SJCs.
I saw some features and he played perfectly
dove possiamo vedere i feature match? :)
Li stanno caricando sul canale Konami un po' alla volta, i suoi ancora non ci sono
Però chi era in location li ha visti live
the thing that really gets me thinking is that it's obvious that everyone is talking about the machine control player, he was the only player I had problems with in the 8 rounds. the most curious thing is that precisely because of the decision of an Italian judge, I lost a game against him even though I was right on the ruling. I also appealed to the head judge who also gave me a negative answer even though I was right on the ruling. in the end I won 2 to 1 even though I was right about the ruling. in practice I would have won 3-0 against him. I don't even know why everyone is talking about him. we wouldn't have reached the end of time if they hadn't given me a wrong ruling. I would have won 2-0 very quickly. at the end of the match the 2 judges came to apologize to me for having made the mistake with the ruling.
Could you maybe let us know what the ruling was and what the judges said? 😀
@ gb monster + test Tiger , summon darius from deck, active eff for summon gyzarus from grave, when gyza come to field active eff and declare The 2 targets, in chain book of moon for set the darius. in this mode gyza cant be negated because darius its not face up. so gyza resolve.
judge and head judge say: if the monster come to the field its negated.
obv its not negated bacause darius its not more face up
@@ilmozzo1676 Yes, I have also looked it up now and gyzarus will resolve. Sad the judges didn't know this. Thanks for the explanation 😀
@@redgadgetyugioh 💙
Ma… top 4 è buono dici? ❤❤ Grande Mozzo Numero 1
Respect to a fellow pizon that knows why 3 book is broken
i actually heard the worst about this glad beast guy. he was allegedly stalling in each of his rounds and was all around what the yugioh community didnt need like ever. Wasnt there myself to verify though
the thing that really gets me thinking is that it's obvious that everyone is talking about the machine control player, he was the only player I had problems with in the 8 rounds. the most curious thing is that precisely because of the decision of an Italian judge, I lost a game against him even though I was right on the ruling. I also appealed to the head judge who also gave me a negative answer even though I was right on the ruling. in the end I won 2 to 1 even though I was right about the ruling. in practice I would have won 3-0 against him. I don't even know why everyone is talking about him. we wouldn't have reached the end of time if they hadn't given me a wrong ruling. I would have won 2-0 very quickly. at the end of the match the 2 judges came to apologize to me for having made the mistake with the ruling.
Trap dustshoot is a banned card, no? ^^
@@UlliBertholt In modern yes, in edison is limited
why play the BW synchros? cool deck man, no nonsense
Because my second fauvorite deck is BW 💙 and I topped in Berlino with BW
No brain/mindcon and he already maxed out all the other extra deck cards he could possibly summon so it's 3 "free" slots. If you play less than 15 you are giving information away for free to your oppornent.
@@ilmozzo1676 Awesome deck man, was curious about your thoughts on Airbellum and why you don't play it, appreciate it and congrats!
No proving ground?
He said in another video he plays too many monsters already
Bs that he got top 4 and walks away with a pod playmat
@@il_goose2371 prize pool was split among the top 7 😉
@@redgadgetyugiohthats great to hear lol
@@redgadgetyugioh wait, what about the 8th? lol
@@JohnsonBoss23 I guess didn't want to split. Not sure what he/she played 🤷♂️
@@redgadgetyugiohconferme