Bill would ban kids under 13 from using social media
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 кві 2023
- A bipartisan Senate bill proposed this week would ban children under the age of 13 from using social media. Nikole Killion has more on what the two senators who co-sponsored it hope it would accomplish.
#news #socialmedia #senate
"CBS Weekend News" and "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell" deliver the latest news and original reporting, and goes beyond the headlines with context and depth. Catch the "CBS Evening News" every weekday night at 6:30 p.m. ET on the CBS Television Network and at 10 p.m. ET on the CBS News app.
Subscribe to the "CBS Evening News" UA-cam channel: bit.ly/1S7Dhik
Watch full episodes of "CBS Evening News": cbsn.ws/23XekKA
Follow "CBS Evening News" on Instagram: bit.ly/1T8icTO
Like "CBS Evening News" on Facebook: on. 1KxYobb
Follow "CBS Evening News" on Twitter: bit.ly/1O3dTTe
Download the CBS News app: cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8
Try Paramount+ free: bit.ly/2OiW1kZ
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com
The way adults are behaving that it is no wonder the kids are sad. Tell kids that if they don't like the way adults behave then don't behave like them 😒
All they have to do is lie about there age like we did as kids 💀
Republicans who reject big government and nanny state while favoring parental rights should be against this.
When I was 13, my friend found a stash of Playboy and Penthouse magazines in the shed behind his neighbors house. Sex education has come a long way man.
This keeps stalking, predators and other bully down. When I was 13 no phones or electronics go out and okay and come inside when the light came on
This will be impossible to enforce. Kids are just going to lie about their ages
It is the parents/guardians that need to stop them from using the sites in the first place.
I say wait until they are 18. Also, Republicans asking for bigger government is kind of their thing.
You are completely clueless when it comes to the left vs right paradigm....... And what it means...
@@MrTubs911 you are just clueless or acting in bad faith. Either way 💩
@@MrTubs911 explain to me the paradigm. Explain the irony. Please.
@@brianb99 because you claimed republicans are big government this is absolutely not true the right is known specifically either loved or hated for it on the fact they want to decrease government regulations decrease size scope and powers of the government to turn them to the states as they should be and the left wishes to increase federal power provide special benefits like legal immunity for government employees in certain fields expanding size budget and scope of the government increasing regulations without allowing people to decide for themselves if its in their best interest they also greatly enjoy increasing the number of people reliant on government aid or federal funding as it means they have a permenant voter base where as republicans wish to reduce number of people reliant on government aid or help to increase individual independence via solutions such as helping to assist in education and rehabilitation providing temporary free housing as long as they are actively looking for a job or seeking treatment so they can be employed they also offer a variety of other things to help people better take care of themselves and to make sure in a emergency they can live a happy life
@Brian Burkett the difference between left and right is a scale of government influence on the public. The farther left you the bigger the government gets. Communism is the farthest to the left you can go. That is big government controlling all aspects of your life. The farther right you go. The government gets less influential in people's lives. And the farthest to the right is no government at all. Aka no rule of law. It's not irony... that paradigm scale has been in America politics since the founding.....
There is a reason why the left pushes for more taxation, and government aid. While the right doesn't want to push more bigger government spending plans....
The left is for bigger government control.
There is a reason why tesla left a blue states for a red state. Less taxes and government regulations!
The philosophy of the right is individual right. The philosophy of the left is the majority rules.
I'm not sure if this is a good idea to do this.
kids need to make their own choices. parents should give them options instead of social media.
It's about time
I agree with the new law kids that are under 13 or 16 should not be using social media.....
Cotton is pathetic 😒
???
Teacher here and I’m so glad. Should be more strict.
Teachers, youth shelter monitors, youth shelter volunteers, and police officers should be strict about not sexually touching other people's children.
I thought parents were supposed to be able to make decisions over what their children do? I guess the government decided they’re raising your kids too. 🙃
I guess you never heard of the concept of "Think of how dumb the average person is. Then consider that half of them are dumber than that." Being a parent doesn't magically make you all knowing and qualified.
It's a good question. I used to think we should all be anarchists but we need a form of social enforcement. A lot of people don't know much so I do think this is necessary. Social Media is like the whole world, I wouldn't want my kids or any kid watching everything possible without having the time to process it. Kids need a guide or else these kids can die pretty quickly to philosophies. Life is a gift we should treasure depending on how we view it, I'm Christian.
@@cartoonraccoon2078 Ahhh most parents are stupid so let’s let the government decide what to do with their children. Gotcha.
@@yourphantomsoul6642 I agree children need a guide, that guide however should not be a government body. Do you honestly think there is a benevolent reason behind why they want this? If you do you are insanely naïve.
I agree that children at that age shouldn't be on the internet
Naw they need to learn how to think for themselves so they become pro gun, pro gif nutjobs.
We should ban algorithms outright. They are bad for adults as much as for kids.
CBS Evening News - Your streaming audio volume is being recorded to low. Your saturation level has plenty of room. This is analyzed compared to most other UA-cam channels. You can even hear the analog elements hiss (white noise) in the low spots.
Here's a crazy thought, don't have children if you aren't going to try to be a responsible parent.
Unenforceable...good luck with that😂
@Bryce Theobald , thanks for confirming what a dysfunctional tool you are🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
houw about 15 and under 13is going to change nothing at all NOTHING
The government is overreaching.
LOL. Good luck with enforcing that law. 😂
Not enforceable. This would get thrown out in the courts.
@Bryce Theobald 😮👍👍
@Bryce Theobald 💯 👍👍
Parents are to blame for not seeing what their kids do
You have to be 18 and older
All parents should understand there are predators online .....
This just shows women can’t take a joke💀
Good luck
@Anna I’m Not a Banana Ron desantis 2024
I don't think any government bureaucrat should have the right to tell people what they can or can't do. It is up to the parents to monitor their kids.
I think you destroyed your own argument halfway through making it. It is clear that leaving it up to 'the wisdom of parents' hasn't been working for the last couple of centuries. We had to convince people to wear seatbelts too, for their own good.
@@cartoonraccoon2078 By your logic should we also ban alcohol, cigarettes, fast food joints, and anything else which might possible be dangerous? You want a nanny state to coddle the population by taking away all freedom? I couldn’t agree more that social media has wrecked havoc on the country and the world, not just for children, but especially the adults. But you cannot force people to change. They must adopt it on their own for their own good. They say the only time a drug addict quits is when he wants to.
I'm curious to see how they try to control that. It's not going to work and what level of social media.. Would it be app to app to all cause there are kid/teen apps for them only.
18 AND OVER.
This is getting out of hand..The govt shouldn't even have a say
My kids don't want it or need it..
They are far too switched on and active in life to even give social media a thought..
So who is going to post
Should be under 18 be banned from using social media!
Can't be stopped kids are smarter than you think..
Great idea but I see problems with enforcement.
It's the parents job to control what their children watch and do not the goverment.
Its too complex of an issue for big government to regulate. There's good content for minors that they should have open access to.
On social media? There isn’t anything good for anybody on Twitter et. al. UA-cam is tricky though since it is social media but it is also the most comprehensive repository of user videos.
Well I have to say on that there is a lot of good stuff on for instance when I was like 12 to 9:00 you know I was watching how to do woodwork and I was learning physical traits I wanted to know how to weld I wanted to know how to do plumbing hell I still use it today and I'm almost 20 I feel like we've got to be careful and not give the government too much power that should be up to the parent not the the government should not be raising our children@@UnchainedEruption
I agree
If the social media companies have all these tools to protect kids, why is social media effing up our kids?
It should be under 18
Kids are not our problem we are not responsible for stranger’s kids
Good
Do kids not have parents?
The way I see this is it shouldn't be allowed because it's taken away the freedoms of children or just in general people and I think it's stupid I feel like that should be up to the parents to do that job not a government or an agency I feel like we're giving the government too much power if parents don't want their kids watching something and how hard is it to check their phone to take hell I'm a brother and I asked my little sisters to my stepmother check the phones need more power to the parents not
muahahaha. multimedia was a mistake, we need to go back to all text social networking
You know what a huge market that is, the Republicans will not let that happen?
Yes. This law will help kids. I used FB but I don't trust it for kid use. Part of this is the parent's responsibility.
Good idea. This is the minimum.
Im not a fan of banning things because the parents dont know how to watch thrir damn kids.
Social media companies need to be held accountable. There products are addictive and kids should not be on them. There needs to be a robust age verification system.
Robust as in every user has to provide every online company personal information proving how old they are?
It’s as always Fake news about phony banking state of bondage. It’s all drivel not in billion years is fake government serving anyone but gigantic wealth. Government for human hood vote accountability and love died in Germany 1945 bondage restored.
Then don't let YOUR kids on social media!
What do you want artificial intelligence and retinal scans for everybody, that sounds like something the Republicans are pushing, kind of like a self-fulfilled Destiny for their Christian right?
The parents are responsible. It’s not the government’s business to ask for I.D. of everybody who visits a site. That sounds authoritarian like China. Way easier to have parents just do their job and maybe not buy their kid a phone until they’re old enough, and maybe check in once in a while to see what they think about things. Provide perspective.
I vote for making social media completely illegal and prosecute the creators for all the damages. They’ve done to society.
But then y'all are gonna start whining about "we don't have technology anymore, how do we even manage?"
I would be behind that depending on the definition of “social media.” I don’t think any public online forum or message board is bad, just the ones interested in psychologically manipulating people by algorithms designed to addict and selling user data to marketers. But all that is vague and I lack confidence in legislators, who may be well-meaning, to be able to delineate what kind of a site is okay vs what isn’t. It’s too easy for that to just become blanket censorship if too broad, or easily circumvented if too narrow.
Banning all forms of social media violates the first amendment. Big tech should be regulated instead.
Don’t whine and do something else productive.
UA-cam also counts as social media, making you a hypocrite.
We have gone far enough that we can’t turn back to good luck wishing for that
Technology is super important nowdays
It is not social media sites that are at fault it is the parents fault for allowing their children to use them.
Unenforceable
How the duck do you regulate social media?
It already is it’s not very hard to bypass.
tbh im so sick of seeing these 9 year olds post cringe gacha life stuff on yt shorts.. but leave it to the parents to decide weather they want their kids to have it or not
Why not use algorithms solely for factual, educational content? For example, one time, the kid searched for how an engine from a Mustang or Charger or whatever favorite. And Why not force the companies to make parental control apps more user-friendly and with better options and descriptions of what the kids are watching?
Because there is no way a millionaire can become a billionaire that way.
Who’s going to decide what is “educational” content? We’ve reached a point in society where certain school districts cannot even tell if “slavery has its upsides” belongs in a curriculum on the Civil War era or whether books about girls becoming boys and vice versa have a place in elementary school. This is the post-truth era where the (ex)POTUS can just blatantly lie very obvious and easily disproven lies about a stolen election, and somehow half the country still believes him. So if nobody in the country can even agree on the objective truth anymore, how do you expect a government entity to remain unbiased in filtering out lies and bias? They might view their partisan politics as “educational fact” while censoring actual facts that contradict their ideology.
Just under 13 Bs . Under 18 .They all should be baned after hours and early morning only use during weekends
Why, that’s just stupid bro
vpn
FR
Children under 18 can’t have cyber accounts, but yet they do.
Thanks God❤