HOW to Get Better at Poker Using a Solver
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
- 🏫 Join the hundreds of happy poker players who have already embarked on a rigorous poker education with The Carrot Poker School: carrotcorner.c...
🎒 SAVE £100 when you combine theory and practice with the Back to School Bundle this September: carrotcorner.c...
📺 Subscribe to Carrot Corner to watch the trueEV series and 57 other educational videos for just £49.99: carrotcorner.c...
🎁 The Apprentice Bundle awaits at Carrot Corner: carrotcorner.c...
📧 Get Pete's Beginner Blueprint Video FREE by joining our email list: carrotcorner.c...
📜 Video Description 📜
Poker Solvers are a valuable tool for improving your understanding of the theory of poker. While we shouldn't seek to imitate GTO poker in all spots, we can use solvers to explore the 'whys' and 'hows' of the game. In this video I switch between analysing hands I played at 200NL Rush and Cash on GG Poker and PIO solver analysis, showing you how to use a solver correctly.
I always hear Russian cash :)
You would be totally fine playing at 200nl full ring. Get off gg though, its a rake trap.
So true
I can only play on ignition bovada :( High rake no rakeback
A soft pool though with some decent scope for high winrates.
I'd be interested in seeing how Pio changes the IP's betting on the flop when we nodelock for an OOP range check on the turn as you suggested would likely happen. I ran a sim the other day where I nodelocked a similar range check, and it changed a 75% bet into a 99% bet. I also think that nodelocking is a must in low stakes games because very few players are anywhere near optimal, and changing just one hand to being bet/called/folded either a little too often or not enough totally changes the sim.
I ran the 86s hand on wizard,villain prefer using big&OB sizing OTR,but K9s most likely choosing OB sizing,anyone knows why?
What hands will we triple barrel on the board with the A6 hand except value nuts and second nuts and top set (not sure here)? I heard those triple broadway boards are way underbluffed especially triple barrel bluffs and I pretty much think that's true.
It should be a mistake to call hands even as strong as top two pair in villains position. Not sure people do fold these though often enough but it makes sense to fold for me. We don't beat value hands and as I said it is underbluffed by most players...
Like my Comment if your on team
F Wizard - Team PIO
(And thanks Pete for the hint with the arrows and subtree)
What's up guys, Pete Clarke here
Why did pio solver cross the road?
To get to the other size
kinda weird that they come to different rake/100 for each stake on primedope since rush and cash rake is same for all stakes
Is the rake cap in bb the same or just the rake %?
Rakecap and % are the same
@@brenneisenchevy981Where did you get this info? As far as I know the rake cap at 2NL is ~10bb and at 200NL ~3bb.
'that victim mentality that's irritating to everyone around us'. Oh yeah, quite a few popular streamers out that think they run worse than anyone else in the world. It is rather sad.
You know what is irritating, complaining about other people being irritating.
Isn’t that what your doing?
@@iainclark6210SMASH
@@jeffshackleford3152 U know what is also irritating?? Complaining about complaining that other people are irritating. Now im officially ending cycle circle that i know that also.
@@iainclark6210 No complaints here, merely stating fact
You talk about Poker like a good theory coach, but also like someone who has never really crushed/beaten midstakes or anything beyond that. I do enjoy the vids though.
If you learned to play golf, you wouldn't need Rory McIlroy to teach you. You need somebody who is a decent player who knows what a good technical swing looks like, who can communicate with you in a style that works for you.
@@Bean-js9bcand in my case they need to be able to teach me how not to rage-throw the golf clubs all the time.
You assume that everyone knows how to use a solver..and you talk at lightning speed...its very hard to understand..
You can't use solver for LOW stakes, total waste of time and costs you money get real.
totally incorrect, using nodelocks on a solver to understand what different villain types do wrong to exploit maximally is a staple of crushing low stakes
@@zenpool5918 hi sorry new to poker. What does that mean?
@@zenpool5918 true that
@@zenpool5918 why explain
Wow that's superficial. You always can use a solver because you train yourself and see when people deviate. Can you make your statement more concrete, maybe?
Of course it is true that exploitative play makes you all the money against humans. Still, we should do our homework when we play against tougher opposition.