In-N-Out meal revealed Scott Peterson's guilt: Detective | Dan Abrams Live
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 чер 2024
- Jon Buehler, a former detective on the Scott Peterson case, and Lara Yeretsian, Peterson's former defense attorney, join NewsNation's "Dan Abrams Live" to discuss a judge's decision to allow new DNA testing on one of the 14 pieces of evidence in the case. The judge rejected most of the defense's requests, determining the analyses were unlikely to exonerate Peterson.
"Dan Abrams Live" brings a fresh, no-holds-barred approach to covering and analyzing the news. Weekdays at 9p/8C. #DanAbramsLive
NewsNation is your source for fact-based, unbiased news for all America.
More from NewsNation: www.newsnationnow.com/
Get our app: trib.al/TBXgYpp
Find us on cable: trib.al/YDOpGyG
How to watch on TV or streaming: trib.al/Vu0Ikij
Scott Peterson is GUILTY AS HELL. Stop it🙄
If that was true, the Court would not have ordered DNA testing last week
@@Solitude47152 lol......
@@Solitude47152 Yeah, he's still GUILTY AS HELL.
@@Solitude47152 why not? So, what are you going to say when they test the duct tape and it doesn't prove him innocent? Or worse, what if it proves him guilty? Then what?
Scott was convicted for being a lying cheating a hole of a husband. The Modesto PD sealed his fate the moment they allowed his mistress to hold a press conference further tainting a future jury. Which btw had never been done by law enforcement anywhere at the time or since then. There is no evidence that shows he's responsible. Do people realize that he was seen at the Berkeley Marina. Who dumps a body in broad daylight? If you saw the boat he launched you would understand right away how absurd the whole thing is. I'm open minded and if anyone has something of substance that can show he actually killed his wife please reply
Innocent people don't change their looks and attempt to flee the country.
Everything about this case gave away his guilt. This is a waste of taxpayer money
The taxpayers are not paying for the testing. The defense is.
@@Solitude47152 who do you think is picking up the tab for everything else?
Hint - *not the LAIP*
@@sophie8394 What costs ? Name them please.
@@Solitude47152 do you think the courthouse runs for free? Who do you think pays the employees? The judge? The attorneys?
@sophie8394 lol. Are these people for real? They, really expect people who know the facts of this case to do the mental gymnastics it takes to believe their ridiculous narrative.
What's even more ironic is they have so many of the younger people, who aren't old enough to remember this case, believing their BS.
It makes me sad for Lacis family to have to put up with this. Scott and his family are truly evil, soulless creatures. I can't even call them people.
This is just a waste of courts time
He told his mistress his wife was dead before she was
He called her from her search and said he was in Paris
No innocent man does that
True.only he and Casey Anthony had crazy ass excuses why they acted like assholes while someone in their care died and they had"nothing" to do with it! Well he is a terrible husband, well she is a terrible mother but...
Please spare the ppl
No , Laci was seen walking the dog. Dog was put away by people in the community with a muddy leash.
You’re probably right, but if new technology allows for a better analysis today than we had in the early 2000s then we should absolutely retest evidence, as long as it’s been preserved. This is why circumstantial evidence is secondary. The courts should always be focused on, and improving our ability, to acquire the facts.
The Innocent Project will set right a horrible wrong!
@@Solitude47152no one saw Laci.
What gave away Scott Peterson's guilt? Everything.
Very profound. Please elaborate more on how you arrived at your conclusion. Surely there must be some evidence you can point to that will support your position? Please. Any direct or circumstantial evidence that says Scott murdered his wife? I agree he's a lying scumbag but that doesn't make him guilty of murder
@vanessadebrino7231 the missing anchors, the bodies were found exactly where he went that day, he told his mistress his wife was dead, and he attempted to disguise himself and flee from justice... for starters.
@@marksprinkle which anchors? You said anchors plural yes ? How many did he have and please tell me where you learned that information. Her body did not wash up exactly where he went. Lacy's and Conners washed up separately and about 1-2 miles from where Scott was actually fishing. His parents lived in San Diego and he was staying there because of the media circus that went from local to national to global in scope. His reason for dying his hair and changing his appearance was to try and avoid the constant scrutiny he was under from the 4th estate. Perfectly reasonable considering. That is all facts btw.
As for his mistress which lie would you recommend he should have used to create the impression that he wasn't married or expecting a child? Thanks for replying I appreciate you doing that. Most people wouldnt so all bs aside thanks.
@@vanessadebrino7231 you seem to know about this, so you should know about the missing anchors. It was all in the testimony during the trial.
Of course he killed her! You only need circumstantial evidence and there are pages of it on Scott. You obviously believe differently but don't fool yourself. Read the trial transcript. He died his hair, and his mom gave him lots of money in an envelope to go bye-bye, not to avoid the press. Seems like more than Scott's in denial here.
Scott Peterson and Casey Anthony, two of a kind. Evil and disgusting.
They deserve each other. Maybe she will attend his retrial and they can fall in love and marry when he is back in the can~!!
I don't believe that Casey Anthony purposely killed Kaylee. Scott Peterson, however, totally purposely killed Laci and Connor.
This slimy murderer should never see the light of day….RIP Laci and Conner
Guilty then, guilty now.
Move on.
Yep that plain & simple!
👏🏻
Scott Peterson is as innocent as OJ Simpson
The sad fact is, OJ walked because of his privilege!
😂true
@@Mgmb1123 That was the first time I realized that the rich and famous ca get away with anything.
And likely the FBI agent Gonzales who shot his wife in the chest four times.
😂
He traveled close to the Mexico border with thousands of dollars and dyed his hair.
Oh yeah! I forgot about that!
My favorite excuse for Scott fleeing was "he was avoiding the press"... all the way to Tijuana! 😂
He also ordered a friggin combo with a milkshake minutes after learning that his baby was dead. Real solid guy.
...and, a fake ID!
And for some odd reason walkie talkies and viagra 10k in cash, his brother’s id and a disguise kit. What a creep.
…as one does.
This woman is mind boggling ridiculous.
She is a real mess😅
Exactly! The detective facial reaction to her ridiculous theories…what a crazy lady, delusional..
She is stumbling too. They don’t have a leg to stand on.
Who?
Lawyers are known to have a high incidence of psychopathy. Number two on top ten list of psychopath occupations. No offense to any lawyers and judges who aren't psychopaths.
He sold her car before they even found the bodies in the bay 🤷...who does that during the search?
That blew me away. Wife goes missing…..where is she? OMG 😱. I think I’ll sell her car.
My elderly neighbor lost his wife to heart failure. Her name was on a license plate on her car. He never sold that car. Kept it maintained and often drove it as the years passed
Well, golly gee, we all react differently!!! Your pregnant wife is missing and you react by immediately getting a subscription to the Playboy channel!
And if that doesn't help you cope with the stress, you sell her car! Yep. Sure. 🤣
This creep of a man, was found guilty. He didn’t want the “Family Life”. All the known and proven evidence was beyond a reasonable doubt. I followed this tragedy from day one.
The Innocent Project will set right a horrible wrong!
@@michael-4k4000 Elvis is that you?😂
@@michael-4k4000Innocence Project CA which isn't affiliated with any of the REAL Innocence Projects.
He needs to be free. He is innocent
@@johngreystone ah satire
So let me get this straight ... the defense attorney would have us believe that the burglars masterminded putting Lacey in the bay where Scott fished - this means the burglars took the time to weigh down Lacey and get a boat and go out on the bay and take a chance no one would see them dump her body - all to frame Scott, the husband who was proved to have made several home-made anchors. Ya, don't think so. Scott is guilty, he is right where he belongs until the day he dies.
For sure but I’d still like to see some data to confirm it if possible. Nothing like cold hard facts, unbiased and unassuming, especially when the killer is narcissistic enough to think it could exonerate them.
@@istrumguitarsthe cold hard facts are that the Medina's yard was searched on the 25th and there was no evidence of a break in.
No kicked in back door, no open shed, no tools on the lawn and no hand cart/dolly in the front yard.
The burglary happened on the 26th.
💯
@@sophie8394yep!
Good old circumstantial evidence miss defence lawyer..he should count himself lucky he got off the death penalty because that’s what he deserved. She should be embarrassed as a woman to be defending this asshole this many years later.
This is ridiculous! Scott stop traumatizing Lacy’s family…give them peace.
Traumatizing 😢
They'll never have peace.
P o s scott cares only about
Himself.
“He’s maintained his innocence…” of course he has, he’s a total narcissist.
Innocent people don’t flee. He was guilty 20 years ago and he is now.
He NEVER told his family he bought a boat and what happened to the home made anchor weights? Did the guys in the van steel those too? GUILTY
I think he was the one using the robberies as a scapegoat
Let Scott’s Sister in-law pay for the testing. She seems to think highly of him. Fun fact: Conner would be over 20 and an adult by now and would no longer be a financial burden on Scott. He should have let them live.
Wow, 20 years 😮
I don’t think it was the financial side to it more of not wanting to be tied down and help with raising their son instead of fishing on Christmas type sh!T
The Innocent Project will set right a horrible wrong!
@@michael-4k4000 Elvis is that you?🙃
@@rickreallylikedthevideobut7899
Naw. He's Abe Lincoln
He’s BORED and wants something to do! 🙄🤡 he’s a MURDERER!!! Not JUST a murderer, but a murderer of his OWN wife and baby!!
Who could eat after getting what should be the absolute worse news of your life?
This whole thing with Scott is a waste time. He should rot in prison
Oh please. 🙄 Laci’s body and child’s body were found in the very place that Scott went “fishing” on Christmas Eve.
Apparently the robbers decided to change their MO’s drastically and instead of robbing the house they took her and framed him for murder. It can happen to anyone./sarcasm 😅 he’s guilty and they’re wasting money.
That is untrue. Her body washed up four months after she went missing and it was found about 2 miles from the exact place Scott was fishing
@@vanessadebrino7231she was found in the body of water he fished in.duh
@@isabellavalencia8026 if you want to make that claim you can. You just can't say she washed up "the very place" he was fishing the day in question. Two miles is a pretty good clip from where he was though. But your assertion is technically correct
@@vanessadebrino7231 2 miles is nothing in a fast moving body of body and I made no such claim, you are confused that was the Op.
It's a no brainer, Scott Peterson is guilty. He's lucky he didn't get the death penalty.
He did get the death penalty. He was on death row for almost 20 years. But they commuted his sentence very, very recently. Last year, I think? Maybe 2 years ago. It was because a juror had shown bias and wasn't entirely truthful on their questionnaire. But if you mean had his death sentence actually carried out beforehand, California is not executing anyone right now. It may never happen again.
@@Punnoosia Peterson's death sentence was overturned due to an error made by the judge during jury selection.
It had nothing to do with a biased juror.
The verdict 20 years ago was the correct one then, and remains so now.
Waste of the court’s time and money
I’m sick of Peterson’s gaslighting. He’s guilty. Saying crime was happening in the area isn’t compelling evidence to get his original trial overturned. They said the same thing back then. They’re hoping people have no memory of it.
Scott is exactly where he needs to be, in prison! After all these years he has zero remorse! We are sick and tired of hearing all the whining. All the attorneys are doing is whine, whine, whine, for Scott. Waaahhhhh!
Scott is so guilty. I have no idea why this is back in court. Scott needs to rot in jail for the rest of his life
Well the Court understands that he maybe innocent 😇. That’s why new testing was ordered.
The fact he came home & ate pizza & drank milk supposedly waiting in casual clothes after a shower when they were supposed to be getting ready for dinner with her parents says it all. He knew she wasn’t coming back.
I would never trust someone who drinks milk with pizza
THIS comment is what I was looking for.
This is much more convincing than the prosecutors feelings about what Peterson ordered at In-N-Out
I’ve drank milk with lots of meals. Before 35 I was a runner, needed as much as I could. Also, some people grieve differently. My husbands an alcoholic and the stress has been unbelievable for me. I have days where I don’t eat to days where I eat the worst foods I do not normally consume but have extreme urges. I could see a person stress eat high grease and caloric food.
"Hey, your wife and kid are dead"
"Get me a Double, fries and shake"
That's not suspect at all...🙄
Nobody goes fishing in a December rain in the bay area in a little boat .
Also 90 miles from your house and on Christmas eve day and alone.
especially- since he first said he went golfing
And alone.
Uh yeah..... I live in the area and am very familiar with how long it takes to get from where he lived to where the marina is, the conditions of the marina, etc. The guy is so full of shit it's infuriating. It makes absolutely no sense that he would have gone fishing at that time, that he would continue to visit that area in the months after, etc. No one drives all the way from Modesto to Berkeley just to be there for such a short period of time, especially multiple times
@@bneal1954sf bay area freeways are no joke. Traffic backs up around Livermore. What person would leave their pregnant wife on Christmas. So many red flags
He lied soooo much about everything. It’s not hard to believe he’s lying about his innocence. He has 0 credibility.
How is this even getting to a court? Ridiculous
So there was a burglary and this is somehow exonerating evidence? Come on. What a joke.
This happened when I was about 15 years old and I remember listening to Scott talking on the phone with Amber talking about “I’m in Paris” 😂😂😂😂 he was at the FCUKIN VIGIL! 🤦🏻♀️
What a huge waste of time and money. He’s 100% guilty. Laci’s “missing watch?” It’s somewhere at the bottom of the Bay, where you dumped the body of your pregnant wife, Scotty. What a slime.
He pawned it for hair dye on the way to Mexico 🇲🇽
Why are these lawyers bothering with this monster? There are real innocent people in prison they could help.
This has always been a media shit show.
They are the reason he was convicted. Let the man get his day in court where the media shuts their fn mouth. I’m 100% alllll for him getting his chance to prove DNA evidence. The media told you he was guilty before any other evidence was found. I hate the media and this is what they want- slow news day?
The real Innocence Project has denied affiliation with the LA Innocence Project.
Understandable with this nonsense.
What a waste of resources..... He did it. And we all know this is a distraction.
The case was rock solid years ago.. still is. Such a waste of court resources to go through it all again.
I was not. The strongest evidence was his demeanor and his attitude? We all wanted him to be guilty. Retrial!
@@traceytrotter9934I think the strongest evidence was Laci and Connor's bodies washing up on shore right where Scott had been fishing the day Laci vanished. I think what emphasized his guilt was his lack of affect and his comments to his lover about spending his first Christmas alone... a comment he made a month prior to the disappearance.
I've never thought for even a second that the jury got it wrong. This man never even searched for his missing 8 month pregnant wife. He knew it wasn't worth his time because he knew she was dead.
Rock solid is a snapshot in time. The defense’s argument is that the science is better now, and we can get a clearer picture of the data that will verify fact from fiction in the case. I’ve always been pretty certain Peterson is guilty, but scientific data trumps circumstantial evidence any day for me.
@@traceytrotter9934 LOL! Good luck with that!!
@@tishwitchto be fair, they put in the media where Scott was last seen. If anyone else had taken her or killed her, it would’ve been smart for them to dump her there. They never should’ve released that info to the media. It’s supposed to be “guilty beyond a reasonable doubt”. I’m not sure they proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, there was quite a bit of reasonable doubt. Don’t get me wrong, he probably did it. But the law states you have to find they are guilty beyond reasonable doubt and I’m not sure they proved that.
Scott just so happened to buy a boat that no one knew about, made cement anchors and went to the very marina days later where he dumped her body.
Grant money that could be given towards an innocent person. What a shame.
Watching that Defense Attorney attempt to paint Scott innocent, made me seriously want to VOMIT!!🤮
He IS GUILTY & is exactly where he belongs…!
what convinced me of his guilt was....selling the house before she was found and the biggie was.......him trying to take off to mexico....why would he flee. thx
Selling her car right away too and telling his mistress she was already dead,
All wrong, Scott Peterson is from San Diego, where his family lives to this day. He drove to San Diego to escape the non stop press and harassment in Modesto.
He didn’t sell the house and he wasn’t trying to take off to Mexico.
How is it that people STILL don’t understand these things?
@brennanhuff2960 lol. If you think that lady on this video doesn't sound bonkers, that explains sooo much.
@@ReneeFabulous-wt9ty Did I say anything about her?
She sounds idiotic with those ludicrous claims.
She Absolutely Does,Its totally Ludacris
@@kimcircagirl474 IKR! I'm suffering from second-hand embarrassment for her.
Please use your grant money to help an innocent person. He is not innocent.
Sorry, but nothing the lady said was very convincing to me.
If you hear her talk, she doesn't even sound confident in what she's saying. She's talking out her a$$
He was tried, found guilty convicted and no way should he get out-EVER
People need to stop glamorizing these monsters just because they’re handsome. Watts, Peterson and others are monsters
Seriously, I feel like everyone and their mom is taking the contrarian approach these days. Case in point: Kohlberger.
@@TheBishop12 i agree :(
Say it Again !
@@kimcircagirl474 monsters!
This poor woman. What year did they do her frontal lobotomy?
😂👏😂👏😂
It could have been a series of “shock therapy treatments”.
The anchor, the boat, the “fishing,” the bodies, the conversation with Amber, all add up to his guilt. He is a narcissist and will maintain his innocence bc that’s what they do. He makes me sick
Lol, this man is a man maintaining his innocence. Don't they all.
He was found guilty because he was, and he should never be let outside to do it again
What a waste of time and money.
Why in the hell is the innocents project destroying its reputation backing this psycho?
It's not THE Innocence Project, it's The Los Angeles Innocence Project.... different entity and I'm sure The Innocence Project is tired of the misunderstanding impacting work on real cases deserving of their focus.
They aren't. This is being done by The Los Angeles Innocence Project which is not the same organization although it sounds like an affiliate. I'm sure THE Innocence Project is frustrated by this as much as we are.
Darn good QUESTION....WHY?????
Ohhhhhh different org.????
Even when the accused is guilty, cops still withhold evidence from the defense and plant evidence and make up fake evidence in order to get their target off the streets. They just want to make LE squirm.
The defense attorney doesn’t believes what she is saying herself
burglary across the street lead to a methodical disappearance of Lacy?🤔
SERIOUSLY?
( how stupid do they think we are?🤦♂️)
Sadly, The Innocent Project is really that STUPID to be supporting Scott Peterson. 😢
Oh stop it. Burrglars!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Burglars know that Scott fished at the spot where Lacy was dumped........Please!
Scott did it and he knows it.
He plead Not Guilty, only a biased jury made a finding of guilt. However The Court just found DNA evidence testing is necessary.
@@Solitude47152 yeah, and I can't wait for it to come back with Scott's DNA on it.
Lot's of exonerating evidence????
Did the burglar go fishing in San Francisco bay ???
Really, Lara? Scott Peterson has continually said he’s innocent therefore he is? So ridiculous! She’s delusional.
Why didnt they argue this at his trial?? He sank himself....burglars don't grab pregnant women and murder her throwing her where her husband is "fishing".....good lord!
I thought they did argue this at trial, but that the jury didn’t believe they were related. Now the defense wants to test that evidence in hope it will exonerate him. I’ll bet it doesn’t.
I actually remember this from the first time around. There had been a burglary nearby and the defense wanted to use that to get him off, despite the fact that there was no evidence they were related and a half ton of evidence that he had done it.
I fast forwarded this woman on the panel 🤨🤦🏾♀️. Ma'am, wake up and smell the coffee ☕️...YOU sound hypnotized 🙃🤦🏾♀️
Even someone who eats their feeling couldn't take a bite after being told your wife and child were found murdered
Yes. I agree that people react differently. However, there are limits to that argument. Some people cry, don't cry, freeze up, deny, scream, argue---that's true. But they don't order hamburgers or spray Silly String or any of stupid arguments made by slimy defense lawyers.
Yessss! Absolutely Correct
They found her hair in his pliers where he made the anchors. Yeah, it didnt have a root ball ,but they can still match the hairs. Circumstantial evidence is evidence. Dude is guilty.
One little piece of evidence on a piece of tape on Lacy’s pants will never override all the other damning facts in this case. PLEASE PUT IT TO REST. If Calif would have done its job and followed thru with the death penalty he was given to begin with then we wouldn’t be wasting time and money on this evil monster. This woman only wants her 15 mins of infamy
WOWI!! She doesn’t even blink!!
lol 🫣😆
Maintaining one's innocence is not evidence.
The Lara woman needs her law license pulled.
What's hilarious is that Scott's SIL is going to law school, just to help in Scott's release. She's obsessed.
License pulled? For what? 😂
She’s so full of it. I guarantee she’s making up the claim that she’s seen parents who just lost a child, in complete shock and laughing and telling jokes. She took the lie too far. And the idea that the “real” killer put Laci’s and the baby in the bay in order to frame Scott is absolutely absurd. The “real” killer had gotten away with it. Everyone was looking at Scott thinking he did it, including the police. There’s no freaking way someone who’s getting away with murder is going to risk it all and actually move the body to the site he knows cops are focused on, just to make the guy he’s framing look even guiltier. No freaking way!
No that's true because it's not exactly an original observation, it's more common than you think because that's their specific coping mechanism. People have different ways of dealing with tragedy. You haven't been around long enough if you think everyone reacts only by balling their eyes out.
Yeah,.. best be careful talking about demeanor of parents who've suffered such tragedy .
e.g. sandy hooks school parents
Exactly. If the real killers were trying to frame Scott they would put the body where it could be easily found on the beach, not try to weigh body down and thrown into the ocean🙄
@@el80ne You haven’t been around long enough if you read what I said and interpreted it as me saying that everyone reacts the same. I am saying that SHE was making it up that she’s seen it. She didn’t say “Oh I saw this one dad who looked like he hadn’t even heard the news but the next day he looked like he’d been run over by a truck”. She said that she’d seen multiple parents sitting there laughing and cracking jokes. The only time a reaction like that would be common is if you’re dealing with a parent who lost their child to a terminal illness and they knew it was coming. But for a parent to get news that their child has died suddenly, it’s rare that someone would be sitting there acting like they were at a comedy club. It’s the exaggeration of how extreme it was and how she is claiming to have seen it more than once that tells me she’s making it up to sell her argument. I didn’t say it never happens. I’m saying I don’t believe she has witnessed it as many times as she claims.
@@trickortrump3292 🎯
This is a waste of everyone's time and money. The man is a monster. He's not getting out.
Sure...... Burglars grabbed her because she was a witness, killed her, dismembered her, then drove her body 90 miles away to drop it in the ocean, and it happened to be the same exact spot Scott Peterson went to go fishing all by himself in the same exact day. Then, they cam back and burglarized the same home some more while TV crews were outside. 😂
Meanwhile, Scott is back with his new woman, telling her about their future plans and what life will be without Laci being alive, BEFORE reporting her missing.
Right??? What a bunch of bullshit. His former defense lawyer is just as terrible as she was 20yrs ago bc she has nothing to truly demonstrate Scott’s innocence.
Scott has been convicted because he is guilty!
Scott killed Lacy.
How is it been ?
HUH??😮@@Fat12219
Scott is aging like a fine wine in a cool dark cellar. Keep him there.
"Scott maintains his innocence". 🤣 Like over 90% of those incarcerated. Except upon that guilty verdict the presumption of innocence disappears.
Well said.
As far as the burglary, it’s not like the robbers killed anyone in those houses. This is beyond ridiculous
Why even keep this man alive and stop wasting tax payers money on this person life.
He was found guilty because he is!
This guy is guilty as sin. I followed this case and read every book on it. His own sister said he was guilty! There was SO MUCH evidence pointing to his guilt! What a waste of time and money.
The burglary thing was looked into, that was the FIRST thing that was looked at. And why did she just happen to be found where Scott goes fishing? And why was Lacy's dna found on a tarp and ropes in the boat? Why did the Petersen house smell like bleach and one set of clothes in the washer? Why did Scott dye his hair and try to flee to Mexico? What a joke.
Yeah, he had bleached blonde hair. I wonder if he is in the Illuminati, and that is how he got Mark Geragos and all these weird people trying to free him. Maybe it was a ritual killing.
Scott Peterson's original lawyer asked about this at his original trial. He was told that the burglary occurred two days after Lacey went missing. All of Scott's appeals after that centered on this burglary which was repeatedly denied by judges. All they were asking for was Discovery and so is the Innocence program. What is the big secret about this burglary or home invasion and why is it such a secret. Also he was heading north to his parents house not South to Mexico take a look at the map. Also you talked about a lot of evidence there was no evidence only a prosecutor's Theory. California is number two in the country for exonerated convicts. If there's a chance that this is relevant it should be looked into. I do not know whether Peterson is guilty or not because I was not there. But I believe everyone is entitled to a fair trial and proper discovery. Prosecutorial misconduct is the biggest reason for exonerations. And they have qualified immunity so we can't touch them when we catch them.
I have done the same as you and have read everything in this case A-Z. However I'm on the other side of it and believe he is innocent. The people interviewed for the burglary were never cleared and that's the extent of it. Law Enforcement announced to the public where Scott was on the day of Lacy's disappearance. Her and the baby both washed up on shore four months later. They were separated a good distance from each other and about 2 miles from where Scott was fishing. Not very close at all and in an area with easy access. If you were responsible and paying attention to the case you would not only have the perfect scapegoat but also the perfect location to frame Scott. I never heard of Lacy's DNA found on tbe tarp or ropes so let me know where you learned that. I know they found a hair consistent with one of Lacy's. One person claimed they smelled bleach at the Peterson house and that was Al Brochini who was discredited during the trial. And Scott was in San Diego where his parents lived. He dyed his hair to avoid the paparazzi and news outlets who were constantly following him. There is actually no evidence whatsoever that ties Scott to Lacy's murder. Zero. And the circumstantial evidence is weak. Scott was a lying cheating scumbag its true but let's not forget he had become the most hated man in America before Lacy's body ever surfaced. That was because of the media. To give you just one example of how insane this thing was the Modesto police department held a press conference telling the press they were going to update them on the case. So every media outlet both local, national, and I internationally shows up at the scheduled time for the scoop. What happens next ? Amber Frey waltzes to the podium and delivers a scathing statement announcing to the whole world, literally, that she is Scott's mistress and that she was lied to and for good measure offers thoughts and prayers for the missing wife of the man she's banging. NEVER in the history of Law Enforcement/ True Crime has that ever happened nor has it ever happened since. That one, very crucial and unprofessional moment in the case completely obliterated any chance Scott could ever have a fair trial. From that moment his fate was sealed. Remember Lacy's family was supportive of Scott and staunchly defending him. After the Amber press conference they quickly withdrew that support.
@@6barry66finally someone with some sense who actually has taken the time to look into this case. Scott for me is on my Mount Rushmore of Wrongfully convicted. People that should never have been charged let alone convicted. The DA and Modesto police really screwed the pooch on this one. People forget the prosecution came out swinging claiming Scott was lying when he stated that the morning he went fishing Lacy was watching Martha Stewart and the episode was on lemon pies. And according to them Lacy was dead at that time and that was the incorrect episode. The defense not only proved he was telling the truth but showed the episode and the part where Martha Stewart was making the lemon pies to the jury. That one accusation quickly dispelled by the defense should have given the jury reasonable doubt
Read books. Media.
Did you sit everyday at the trial to hear or see the evidence?
Is your guilty verdict achieved by actual factual evidence or is it swayed by means of the media attention and hypocritical statements?
Just another Chris Watts. Wanted to be free so he could ride off into the sunset with Amber Fry.
What a waste of tax payers money! He was guilty then and he’s still guilty!
What pants? Only her torso washed up! Scott is guilty, this is SO absurd!
So why did scott tell amber that his wife was dead much before she went missing.
The sister in law is wacko,! She married into a horrible family and now has to face this!
Guilty guilty guilty
Scott Peterson wants a retrial to establish a reasonable doubt. Clever, but he lost.
The innocence project is really hurting their credibility with this one. What an embarrassment. The public is incredibly knowledgeable on this case and know deeply of his guilt. Where is their funding coming from?
Unfortunately, there are too many people in this world who are too easily persuaded. It's a sad commentary on our educational system. They don't teach research and critical thinking skills until college. They need to start teaching these subjects in 5th grade, so those who quit high school at least have a better foundation to move forward. It is so easy to get some people to donate. They probably got a lot of money over all these years, to donate to The Innocence Project. Essentially, they purchased The Innocence Project, which means The Innocence Project prostitutes its services. This is very damaging to their stance of honor.
It's a different innocence project. A BS version.
The money is probably coming from his parents.
I'm sorry - but no thinking person would give this foolish appeal credence in court.
The fact that this guy thinks he deserves a retro tells you what a narcissistic sociopath he is. Shame on the attorneys that think this is worthy of their time. I have lost any respect for what they do.
Who is this woman ??And how does she live with herself?😮😮
Defense attorney sounds like a tabloid reporter 😂😂
If Scott is innocent
I’m the Pope
He never once looked or acted broken hearted….just arrogant and emotion less.
Women who are pregnant or have recently given birth have a 35% increased chance of being murdered by their partner or spouse. I mean who else would have motive? You can tell even the attorney knows he’s guilty. She’s a terrible liar.
No one from Modesto would drive all the way to Berkeley to go fishing.. there are 100's of miles of rivers between Modesto and the SF bay. Not to mention Lacey just happened to wash up there. 0% chance he is innocent
Scott murdered his wife and baby. He told his girlfriend his wife was dead.
He said “this will be my first Christmas….”.
What a waste of donor $$$. Scott is so guilty
The fact that Scott claimed to go fishing, on Christmas eve in bad weather, hours away from home and then the bodies were found there is not coincidental. He didnt have the right type of boat or fishing equipment.
This defense lawyer trying to say she was kidnapped and dumped in the bay by robbers doesnt make sense. They were not criminal masterminds and they would have had to keep her body hidden for long enough for Scott's fish tale to come out and for them to take the body, weigh it down and get it out into the bay. Did they have access to a boat?? I doubt it.
That alone is enough to convince anyone. And then there all the other evidence that is just icing on the guilty cake.
so well said Icing on the guilty cake!
It was unbelievable that LE released his alibi to the entire world 🌎. They lack credibility
@Solitude47152 you think it's believable for them to take her dead body in the hopes that they would find out where her husband had been that day? If they wanted to frame Scott, they'd have put her body in the Petersons back yard. Not keep it til they found out where Scott was. That's just ridiculous.