Is This The End Of Capitalism? | Answers With Joe
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 сер 2020
- It's a term you've probably heard a lot. Late Stage Capitalism. People use it to describe the absurdities and wild inequalities of the world today. But what is it exactly, and are we really living in it? And if so, what comes next?
Thanks to Felix from What About It for his German help. Check out his channel at: / zssolomon
Want to support the channel? Here's how:
Patreon: / answerswithjoe
Channel Memberships: / @joescott
T-Shirts & Merch: www.answerswithjoe.com/store
Join me on the Our Ludicrous Future Podcast:
/ @ourludicrousfuture
Interested in getting a Tesla? Use my referral link and get discounts and perks:
ts.la/joe74700
Follow me at all my places!
Instagram: / answerswithjoe
Snapchat: / answerswithjoe
Facebook: / answerswithjoe
Twitter: / answerswithjoe
LINKS LINKS LINKS:
www.ted.com/talks/steven_pink...
economics.mit.edu/files/1785
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cholera...
www.theatlantic.com/business/...
History of Consumerism • HISTORY OF IDEAS - Con...
Decline of Feudalism • The Decline of Feudali...
Decline of Feudalism ll • The Decline of Feudali...
Capitalism & Socialism • Capitalism and Sociali...
School of Life: • HISTORY OF IDEAS - Cap...
historicalbritain.org/tag/fra...
www.ed.gov/category/keyword/s...
www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank...
abcnews.go.com/US/10-american...
www.epi.org/publication/chart...
www.thebalance.com/trump-s-ta...
itep.org/60-fortune-500-compa...
publicintegrity.org/inequalit...
School of Life: How to fix capitalism: • How to Improve Capitalism - Наука та технологія
To fix this and many issues in modern life, is to remove money from politics. It should be illegal to give money or incentives to a politician. They are employed by the people.
laughing in clinton
* They *should* be employed by the people.
The problem is is all the politicians are only in this for their own gains not ours
2nd good sir and well said
I think is more easier to go over the speed of light than to do this
"Anyone who has ever struggled with poverty knows how extremely expensive it is to be poor."
--James Baldwin
Poverty is relative though. The poorest person in the US is still better off than poor people in Socialist countries. Been there myself so...
it's not though. one of the arguments made is that poor people are going to eat bad because they don't have the money to buy healthy foods therefore they will have higher medical expenses down the road. well a bag of apples and a glass of water are cheaper than a bag of cheetos and a mt. dew.
+++
@@mfntonberry It kind of is, but not for the reasons OP suspects. When you're poor the taxation that you're forced to pay out of your paycheck and on goods and services hurts you more than someone middle class or above. That extra few dollars you pay on groceries hurts you more if you have less dollars to spend overall, that extra few dollars could be the difference between another good meal or having to starve it out for a day or two.
Infinity Dragon And what socialist country would that be?
I can’t imagine a “good” system where a select group of people decide what “good things” are.
The Won Percent!
If youre afraid of the government, be even more weary of the ppl above the government
@@PhsychoSomatic But those people are the government. Not government itself.
@@Noxturno_ you contradicted your own statement. They are not officially the government. They are illegal entities assuming the role of government you could say. A distinction needs to be made when pointing fingers obviously
@@Noxturno_Most of those people are working, albeit indirectly, in the interest of people with more zeros in their bank accounts than your typical gas station attendant.
The problem with our current system is monopoly laws don't work and haven't in decades. Too many loop holes. When a company gets too big and anyone threatens them with monopoly suits, they just split the big company into two smaller companies still owned by the same corporate entity.
Not to mention intellectual property is also a monopoly.
Put simply every brand should be broken off and given a new board of directors (at least one director representing the workers)
as a socialist that's very true and socialism is the solution but democratic socialism is something amazing that not everyone realizes
also the companys have realised by working with their competetiors they can price gouge more people and make more money, a bigger pie for everyone... well not everety one but the corporations
It definitely feels like we're near the end stages in a game of Monopoly, where a couple players own all the prominent properties, while most of us own a place like Baltic Ave. & are just trying our best to make it around to collect that $200 before we inevitably go bankrupt.
At least in monopoly there is a sort of basic income
and you know how that ends - flipping the board in rage
It's especially hilarious because the game was originally invented as a teaching method for how capitalism, and the landlord property system in particular, eventually lead to poverty for everyone except a select few
Dustin lance black
Things were far worse in the late 1800s before regulations.
The word "sabotage" comes from "sabot", French for a wooden shoe/clog. The workers chucked their sabots into the factory machinery, an act of "sabotage".
We've all seen Star Trek VI, but thanks anyway.
@@casbyness I haven't, you inconsiderate, star trek loving, "death by teleportation disintegration", fanboy. : )
The French word for 'shoe' is 'chaussure.' Sabot is the French word for 'tub.'
@@WmSrite-pi8ck That may be true, but sabots were also a real thing. They were work shoes used in France, Italy, Belgium etc around the 16th-19th century. They're big and cheap wooden clogs for poor peasants and the story of them being the origin of the term 'sabotage' is generally agreed to have happened when workers used their sabots to damage railway equipment in the early 1900s.
@@casbyness The connection to sabots is clear, but not that the sabots were actually used for the sabotage, just that they were worn by the workers in question. (I'm not saying there aren't _some_ historians who believe the sabot-throwing story).
The key to changing our abusive system is, 1st make politicians retire at 65, stop all money in politics, and make a strictly enforced law that any outlet calling themselves news in any way cannot lie. The rest should fix itself.
Most intelligent comment
@@C3Think Thank you, we should do all we can to make that happen.
Politicians and judges.
Never be afraid to stand and fight to create change for the world you want to live in. Well made video, love the new perspective.
When your subject matter is so controversial that you have to spend the first 4 minutes apologizing.
@Kurt Barryman To be fair, the Bolshevik Revolution happened like over 100 years ago
That because capitalism is a religion to right wingers and religious types are very touchy about reality talk.
@@Vlasko60, and socialism isnt a religion based on everyone being equally poor?
@@archdukefranzferdinand567 he's talking about the riots
Only in the US...
I realize why people always leave it out, but it really helps to understand everything: Capitalism is an authoritarian economic system, while socialism is a democratic economic system. In Capitalism the rich own and control the workplace, while in Socialism the workers control the workplace. The "Communist" countries never succeed at becoming Socialist or Communist, but instead the leaders of the revolutions became a new oppressive ruling class.
Exactly. Socialism is democracy applied to the economy.
@James Smith Socialism literally the idea that workers should democratically control their workplaces, and has nothing to do with any government; in fact communism is the idea of a socialist economy without any form of traditional state, basically no government as you would probably understand it. I pretty sure you didn't try to argue against the actually ideas, because you got nothing.
Oh and the old "you just want free stuff"; I know you mad bro, because the system you want to defend is not a good one and people are waking up to that.
@James Smith I know basically no one is actually educated on political philosophy, so I never shocked people have no concept of left vs. right political spectrum. To explain in the simplest turns the political spectrum is about hierarchies where to the left is fewer hierarchy while to right is more hierarchy. There are no political philosophies regarding the proper size of government, because that would retarded.
Capitalism as a system creates power hierarchies in economies, which literally is what leads to monopolies; it is not anything else. Citizens through organized political power can make demands of capitalists, but consumers on the other hand have no real power; voting with your wallet is just a bad joke.
@James Smith Wow, nothing is more convincing than a wall of demented ramblings.
The old "government = always bad" is only convincing to the smoothest of brains. Governments are tools and like a hammer are no more evil than the manner in which they are used. If you cannot imagine a well functioning government, that is a personal failing.
Worker cooperatives are a form of socialism and require no government intervention for their creation.
Democracy refers to the idea of everyone having a voice. A citizen has a voice, a socialist work in a socialist economy has a voice, while a consumer has none. Voting with ones wallet is action of pitiful being stripped of any voice, forced to beg for treats from their capitalist masters.
Again you have failed to argue against socialism, the concept of workers democratically controlling their workplaces.
@James Smith A strawman argument refers to when one creates a position and argues against their created position rather than any real position held. Or to connect the dots, you keep arguing against positions no one holds.
Again, you have nothing. You have failed to make an argument against socialism.
Hi from Germany! Love your channel Joe! Thank you for all the amazing work you and your team do. 🙏💜
-
- Thumbs -- Way -- U P to
Joe ' s " " U N S E E N " " team .
-
Thank you for this thoughtful and thought provoking video.
Yes, it is clear that society is changing so rapidly and in so many multiple dimensions that the existing paradigms and systems are ineffective.
I don’t know the best solution, but something that will combine the ideal intended outcomes of capitalism--that is, the creation of wealth and individual sovereignty--along with with the ideal intended outcomes of Marx and others--that is, that -“each gives according to his/her ability and each receives according to his/ her needs”, UBI at the very least, some equalization of economic class division or redistribution of wealth--seems to be in order.
The guiding principles of society can no longer be limited to valuing only the economic persona or economic usefulness of a human (or animal or any sentient being)--but must shift to the recognition and value of the fulfillment of life itself as the end goal--with all economic systems and structures subjugated to the fulfillment of this higher end goal. This is similar to Maslow’s hierarchical pyramid of Self-Actualization--in other words, the economic system must truly become the servant of life and society, and no longer the master.
We don't need a class of capitalist owners anymore than we need a hole in the head. UBI is a fraud as it is a proposal to save capitalism. Not enough work than a cut in hours with no cut in pay to spread the work around. None of theses utopia libertarian proposals have a snowballs chance in hell of success since they have no way of coming to fruition without the good graces of the ruling capitalist class. The capitalists classes need to be removed from power as they are both incompetent and destructive to the world system of production. We the working class organized into trade unions and with a political party of our own are the only ones capable of doing that. Trump and Yang Wang can't do it for us.
"Dogmatic refusal to change is a losing strategy".
Deep.
Facts. Just ask the Spartans lmao
A dangerously broad assertion, don't you think? I'll leave you to exercise your mind to think of ways such bits of bumper sticker wisdom taken as sage advice could have disastrous consequences.
@@lifeinsaltlakecity4001 perhaps, but also consider the following:
Change itself can be good or bad, there’s sometime no telling. However, if one is dogmatic about not wanting to, that leaves no room for options that could be beneficial.
@@Rairyuujin unless the change in question inherently represents a net loss for the person embracing said dogma. Therein lies a small measure of the dangers of the tyrannous state, that it purports to have the authority to deign to dictate to masses of disparate peoples with differing goals and subjective views what is best for them.
The state and its wise, fearless leaders and supporters are full of bumper sticker wisdom about how you and I ought to be living. A one-size-fits-all prescription for living, backed by the threat of death for non-compliance.
Historically, things end badly for those who dissent. And I dissent, sir.
Religion should take note... But it refuses to admit it is not perfect.
"we need to make a shift towards solutions and away from blind following of ideologies" - Joe Scott
this quote is golden, fr 💯
1000%
The thing is, he's wrong, no one was just blind and decided to follow, there were no other choices, capitalism in itself is designed to slowly strangle out the middle class
@@capo_di_capi Not unless you infer such intent, which is like inferring that "medicine is designed to harm people".
try that with science laws if you truly mean it, ... scientist dare to state something is impossible when they know only a little of what actually exist in the universe
sad to say, but, i personally don't believe there is enough "non-sheeple" to accomplish this,
yes, it's the best way, only thing stopping it is greed and that human trait will not shift,,,,,,
Great balance walking the line, I love the subject exploration here! I've often thought the same thing and this opened an avenue for appropriate discussion. Thanks Joe, as always!
This is such a complicated set of ideas, I've never felt comfortable trying to understand it. But on a gut level, very emotional, changing "Capitalisms scares the crap out of me. Change is not easy and it triggers some of us. Thanks for trying to break this down for our understanding.
The workings of the capitalist profit system are such that it leads to both war, fascism and revolution. Capitalism is based in the nation state and those nation states can't avoid going into Imperialist war.
Thanks for the hug joe. You know you miss human contact when hugging a phone gave you a fuzzy feeling
@T hddh That's not depressing, it don't matter when the last time he had a gf was. What is sad an depressing is trying to put someone who you don't know down, for no reason, making it even worse there talking about how there going threw a hard time with w/e there going threw an you feel the need to make them feel worse. So no I feel pitty an saddness for you an hope you can find peace within yourself to where you don't need to hurt others to make yourself feel better.
Bro, I hope your referring to the pandemic an jus have lack of human contact for that reason but don't listen to this other asshat. Hang in there. An keep your head up. Life can always get better.
Jonathan Van Duzee you sure that wasn’t just a bad earth/ground in your phone charger? Could have been a small electric shock :)
Yea
eh yeah. i got plants for company 🌱
"Work hours are down" -> except the chart shows everyone under 50 has only seen increasing work hours in their lifetime
Because a certain generation didn’t focus more on retirement than relying on ssi
@@NoddinOff. did you miss the under 50 part of that comment?
@@michaelo5665 do you know how much tax money is spent on social security? That has a large impact on how much taxes you pay. Regardless historical working hours are down.
@@NoddinOff. actually I do and it happens to pale in comparison to other parts of our budget but thanks for ignoring the meat of my comment in order to hold up yet another strawman.
@@NoddinOff. in fact in many states it is the government PERs system (a form of retirement) that's creating the biggest hurdles for battling the deficit.
Astute, topical and challenging. And fun. Why I stay tuned. Stay the course bruv. Love your work 😁
The main issue people miss is under Feudalism a worker got to keep about 20% of what they produced. Imagine worker today getting paid 20% of what they produced for their company... ya most people would be making $3000 or more a week. Feudalism was better economically for workers.
I mean, individual mileage definitely varies. But yes, most agrarian workers a thousand years ago worked less than the average worker today.
UA-cam crashed as you said “you might even hear the word... sociali...” and it was really funny xD
haha.. and you hear the endless loop "..sociali... lie.. lie.. lie.. lie.. .. "
R/thathappend
Socialism crashed the inter tube
@@user98xp UA-cam cannot stand not being the kings and queens of old. All the politicians want to revive the medieval ages where the rich are rich and poor are kicked like dogs.
Great post. (Reimiel)
“...dogmatic refusal to change is a losing strategy, whether it’s in economics, or society, or nature for that matter.”
Bravo! 👏👏👏
That is the best thing I’ve heard in a long time.
Sunamer Z did you even watch the video? Taking someone’s quote out of context when he wasn’t suggesting anything within the realm of communism like that I doubt it. He was suggesting that we alter the structure of capitalism much the same way Theodore Roosevelt did by signing the “Square Deal” please just listen to others and know your own history first my friend, this was just an acknowledgement of the fact that capitalism has evolved and grown since the 1800s and we need to improve our system for the current age
Dogmatic refusal to change is a failing strategy - solid explanation for the ever increasing number of non religious people in the world.
@Sunamer ZSounds like someone is dogmatic.
It's not a binary...there are steps.
Runaway capitalism doesn't work, full blown communism doesn't work. Ideally, a capitalist society should provide and help create social programs to raise people up. With social programs, the people have more means to fuel the capitalist machine, society in balance.
Those who vilify all socialism often demonstrate a struggle with compassion and tend to be selfish, elitist, fear mongering capitalists; the corporate cabals and the people they pay and manipulate.
@Sunamer Z I'm really not sure where you were going with this statement. But it comes off as you comparing a need to fix the economy to Socialism which is in no way what was suggested. It was a really dumb thing to say.. especially with what's going on in the US atm. =/
Education isn't evil... neither is common sense.
@Sunamer Z What dogma do you think marxists have?
I just found you last week, and am totally addicted. I just wanted to say thank you, and also, I love your sense of humor. Sarcasm and dad jokes are the best! Whisper "socialism"... made me giggle out loud, so now I'm insane to those around me. Made it through about 20 or so episodes so far, and really looking forward to those I haven't seen yet. Great show, much appreciated!
By the way, a simple move toward fixing some of the problems in our system is simply to tax the wealthy fairly. We used to do that, but since we stopped, things have gotten crazy. I'd suggest we start there, and see what happens.
Cheers!
as a socialist, I didn't become one instantly but I became one because of what it could do for humanity and such. It values equality, better health even free health care, better services, etc. If you are curious to learn more I would ask you to look at the YTber second thought which makes amazing content on capitalism and how it affects our society and how socialism is our solution. Honestly, you don't have to be a socialist but if you do agree with the things that socialism is trying to achieve than we know things have to change.
@koiyujo1543 I like to refer to myself as a social capitalist. Something like a Social Democrat but I believe that capitalism is only a system that can work if it is, in fact, regulated by the government, which is then accountable to the people. I think calling assistant my betta social democracy is okay, but I think calling it a social capitalism is probably more accurate and less stigmatizing unfortunately, in this country we don't practice any of that, we practice government-supported capitalism in that they socialize their losses but they privatized their games, and the government that is meant to represent the people, ends up representing the best interest of the capitalist instead. We are obviously tilting heavily toward a failure in the system as a result of unfairly prioritizing the needs of Industry over the needs of those pain for all the industry, which is stupid and short-sighted way to look at an economic society, and oddly enough seems to be completely lost on all of the most wealthy people in the country which inherently belies the idea that it's a meritocracy. I don't have a problem with socialism, I know how to read, but it's been falsely created with Communism for so long that most people in this country don't have enough knowledge about it to recognize how it's being manipulated against them. Hell most of them don't even realize that we live in a social democracy already. My favorite is when people who work for the government yell about how they'll never let socialism into their country. SMH
Love your videos and your views are spot-on. Well done.
I just started a new job, because Corona cut my regular hours down to almost nothing. I have $62 in my bank account, and that has to last three weeks before my first paycheck. With my new job, essential work being the only thing hiring, I have no sort of medical insurance. My medication costs $113 generic. Also, my car insurance just came due, which I need to have for work, is $137. I haven't even put rent and utilities into this, nor food and basic living expense. Not sure if capitalism is dying, or if I am.
Lack of bottom level wages in last 40 years really hurting. And once self driving replaces commercial drivers. Better small scale robots cheaper. UBI going have to happen if they want keep capitalism, or people will get out the pick forks. yang was really best thing happen to Dems this election and party trying to ingore him.
@@Sinnehh I agree about Yang. I'm not at all happy with the current ballot we're seeing. Last term, I was hoping for Bernie. The lower class really needs more help, we can't keep America going at this rate.
Sounds like the system you live under is failing you... whatever that may be. But, considering you're living on the poverty line, have to pay $113 for generic meds, are worried about medical insurance, AND have stable access to internet, I'd say you're in the USA. Far be it from me that with all those things, it's so close to living under Fascism than Capitalism. Sorry for the struggles you must be having right now.
@@braegrimes8870 You're right, and thanks for your sympathy. The fact that so many more privileged people around me are toting this as the greatest nation in the world is a sheer embarrassment. Honestly, when I speak to people from other countries, I tend not to tell them that I'm from the U.S. I'm ashamed of my country, but have no idea how to change any of it. Which is insane, considering that democracy is what we pride ourselves in the most. I know that our nation is generally better off than many others, but it doesn't make my own everyday struggle any easier. In fact, it leaves me feeling inferior and guilty for not utilizing "the American dream."
@@MadamFoogie unfortunately thats an inbuilt element of the system. If youre not piloting your second yacht you feel guilt and like s failure. You need to free yourself mentally of those false beliefs. The working class is not a lower class. The working class are the honourable class. Their efforts keep society and economy afloat and alive. The parasitical classes of the uber wealthy are the true lower class. They are like pimps living off immoral earnings. My 2 cents
2:12 Sir I am uncomfortable already, having been virtually hugged by a man while pooping.
🤣🤣🤣🤣👍
I could have lived my whole life without knowing that
I was wiping. How do you think I feel? ;-)
Hey Joe, great video, your insight is always valuable. Thank you for bringing up yang's ubi. It needs to reach as many people as possible.
Very nicely articulated. Very insightful. Really great talk. Thanks!!
Wife walked in while I was hugging the monitor. She walked out before I could explain.
Ha ha haaaa!
But seriously, my condolences.
That must be tough
Missing element, Joe always adds some humor to lighten things up & I wish that could have become part of it, good one.
Divorce papers to follow....
I hope you said it was an experimental kind of virtual porn, easier to explain...
Somehow he made economics interesting. I can't believe I watched 23 minutes worth of content about capitalism, and stayed captivated. Bravo.
I completely agree! The time just flew by and I learned a lot.
Thank you, Joe!🙏
Excellent video! 😊💗
@@rachel_v_k is a great place7l to and a great 5most people people the of easy to tnow is to get athe and your able tto to be for the of of of of ofhave yearnext year nextel yearnext yearnext ALl7 I next the to thingy same the atime you nd lthis ittle bit think have been have have to b 6een have been 7 a am be not am am Inot I the first time for of and gooandand good get a d a get abyourforthe le to beget beyou tfact that fact that he and of the can can world the ththe e the is is is is is a new a the best to knowtheis to gis et best way to is ias buy the to gyou are that that et best way to is is the the is is is is is is not is the is is is for best the the the is is and is is is not of best of the tis he most you ais ris is e you are yis ou are ake sure make sure make sure s and and to to more than than get a get a get a to is iand eand ver s to a be able to get get is the to do do the do s is ois search a job are lyto to ou want and ooking for looking for w it is very and and and and he k to work with the usual usual business experience and experience with
Shout out to economics explained
Hooked
Economics is a very interesting and rich field. Heavily rooted in mathematics and philosophy. However modern economics is a pretty different animal than during the times of Smith and Marx.
good job choosing the active voice over the passive, and being a clear to the point communicator!
O
So glad I discovered you! Needed that hug today. Intelligent ideas with bits of humor. Thanks for your discussions. Look for you every day.
I'm currently recovering from emergency surgery, lying in bed and binge watching all of your videos. They are as soothing as my pain medication. They've kept my brain busy. Thank you😊
How ya feeling now?
@@hunterflowerson4460 well rip
@@swami7829 well rip rip
@@yooro3948 well rip rip rip
so, are you poor now? I've heard that going to the doctor in the u.s. bankrupts everyone because of capitalism
"How do you start a working-class revolution without a working class?"
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how the robot uprising started.
This is the plot of iRobot isn't it?
@Thomas Chrombly How is that a "maybe"? If everyone is unemployed, everyone will make $0. It's basically Communism
Nobody born as working class and no working class people want to remain as working class for entire life.
In his video on future robots. He did say that the origin of the term Robots came from the serfs that made up the working class during the industrial revolution...
@Thomas Chrombly Exactly, so robot communism would work
Thank you for this episode, Joe!!!
I’m sharing with others this excellent overview and analysis of capitalism !!!
This is really a more awkward conversation for the US. As a nation you've really gone hard on the capitalism. Most advanced economies are a lot more varied with a lot more centrally located services think universal education and health. I think the argument gets bogged down in it's either everything is market based or everything is centrally owned. That's despite the fact that there's a lot of room on the spectrum between these two extremes...
Market Socialism and Social Democracy have arisen out of pragmatic compromise between the interests of industry and the interests of the people. Now I dont think either of these systems are perfect, but they present how neolib capitalism as shown in the US and most of the Americas is a very inefficient system that will ultimately leave industry unhappy with its lack ability to adapt due to monopolies and a weak centeal government (weak regulation) and people unhappy due rising inequality and class conflict. With State Socialism (i.e. USSR before Gorbechov burned the system and Russia as a whole with it) there will be industry unhappy with slow progress due to extreme level of social support for people, and people frustrated with lack of industrial progress and a very rigid centralized system that cant adapt to their specific community and personal needs and desires. Allowing industry to progress and people to have more freedom for themselves and their community is why socialist states like China and Vietnam and Capitalist states like Japan and Sweden have more stability and economic progress than they otherwise would under extreme economic policies, imo. Then again Im just a dumb youtube commenter
Joe: Things can always be worse!
2020: I'm working on it!
Unoriginal
Alien invasion resulting in human enslavement finna happen next month
What could possibly go wrong in only 3 more months? /s
i love how careful people have to talk about capitalism. we’ve been so indoctrinated.
We have been indoctrinated... to believe there's a viable alternative to capitalism. There isn't. The only countries with successful 'socialist' or 'communist' systems (e.g. China, and some would say Sweden) are ones that learned (the hard way) to embrace capitalist principles. All wealth comes through capitalism. The best any other economic system can do is redistribute the wealth that capitalism created, which undermines the further creation of wealth.
@@RatZapTshirt nobody disagrees when people say they want democratic socialism their talking about giving workers more choices and redistribution of wealth to build safety nets not completely change the free Market just more restrictions
@@danielmoreno-gama5973 If that were actually the case I wouldn't have a problem. A 'free market with a social safety net' would be fine by me (preferably a UBI). But what we get instead as 'democratic socialism' is more and more of those "restrictions" you mention. They've been accumulating for over a century. The banking system has been nationalized, the currency demonetized, etc. We no longer HAVE a free market. That's the only reason we even NEED a safety net now. We're eating the goose that lays the golden eggs, which is the flaw of traditional socialism.
@@degamispoudegamis I really wish the US wouldn't do that, because It gives every socialist government in the world a scapegoat to blame for their own failures. Socialism is so shitty it can't function without a credible scapegoat.
@@degamispoudegamis Oh, so you know something I don't, but should? Please enlighten me, master.
Right now I'm thinking you probably have no argument but just wanted to have the last word anyway. Try again.
I am glad you spoke about this, I have had conversations about the next economic step in some places that really suprised me. People I have met, are more informed about the incoming issues than I expected.
I truly appreciate your even handed way of discourse. Thank you.
You know, all anyone ever wanted in life was an unfair advantage.
@Hooda the Antagonist. How will we achieve that if people shouting for equality, take people's jobs and lives because of there religion, race, and occupation.
@@drewtastic2a763 basically need one unifying goal to work towards that a majority of people want, can't move forwards if everyone is taking the off-ramp ideas
why dont you become a boss then?
@Hooda the Antagonist damn straight comrade
@@ivanliu2581 you understand for the VAST majority of Americans that's simply not feasible right? And to what end? When you become the boss you're just becoming what you hated, another labor exploiting member of the owner class
This has to be one of the best scripted and most meaningful essays on how we got to the current economic crisis and what we can realistically do about it, that I have seen anywhere. A daring topic selection, Joe. My compliments on choosing a very controversial subject which sorely needed to be addressed and would scare away most writers who frankly, lack the fortitude to explore and present it in a public forum. Like a fresco, you've captured your subject with a fidelity and truthfulness within the tight constraints of limited time. A marvelous and informative example of realized art.
Yes, this!
I think his way to approach the subject was the best I've seen.
The humility to put his opinion down so to care for the dogmatic viewer was a teaching of its own. I'll use it in future debates myself.
William Swenson what’s bout how there’s socialism for the rich.. like the elites and the wealthy
omg this was so well written, hard agree.
well sed
European here - socialism not a swear word here! Thanks for your insightful video.
First they were called serfs.
Then they were called factory workers.
Today, we're entry-level employees
14:23 easy to avoid trees falling on our houses, we (my generation - millennials) don't really own any in the first place! Crisis averted /s
I agree. I am a baby boomer. I hear people bitch about millenials today, but they don't realize that millenials grew up watching both parent's and grandparent's working their ass's off to only have to keep working in their 70's and still not own any thing. So what do millenials have to look forward to?
@@davidgraylord5977 as a gen z’r I’m just awaiting the revolution at this point
Well I am a millennial and getting tired of this thing. yeah literally i wanna dropout and trade stocks and forex
@@davidgraylord5977 I was one of the lucky ones, I went into active military service at 18 (2006), saw bitcoin as a futures... and now im sitting on several hundred grand, with a military retirement. I dont need to work but im going to school fulltime for a masters degree in cybersec. I can buy a house outright in most states... but heck... i feel like the 1% of my generation.
I was a lucky one. Im gen z and i didnt go to college so i didnt get saddled with debt. Got a decent warehouse job and i bought my house last year at 23
As a German, your attempt on speaking German was very entertaining 😂👍🏼 btw love your videos ☺️
Same. "Klar, immer wieder gerne, lass krachen" also gave the rest to me xD
Für jemanden der beide Sprachen versteht war das echt lustig
I'm not great at German but I was able to gist out the convo even though I haven't touched it in like a year.
Is this what being bilingual feels like all the time?
@@Nevarek_ are you Not bilingual ?
LOL!🤣Es bringt mich zum Lachen, wenn meine amerikanischen Landsleute denken, dass sie wissen, was für den Rest der Welt am besten ist und was für dieses Land am besten ist. Ich denke, dieser Kerl ist ein Nächtriges.
If youre afraid of the government, be even more weary of the ppl above the government
Felix!! Awesome. Collab with two of my favourite. Only seeing this video now!
Hi from Ireland 🇮🇪
Canadian here... so... this is literally the first time it occurred to me that *some people* might conflate capitalism with democracy. I'm gobsmacked.
Yeah, whence on Earth came that idea?
Yeah. The red scare here brought TONS of propaganda with it. That is why people down here started mixing it up. Now, we have the"Tea" party. It was started and funded by the oil industry's (up until recently) biggest RepubliKKKan party donors. They were tricked into thinking that our government takes to much taxes from us citizens, which WOULD be true, if the government didn't spend more than half of all discretionary spending. Anyway, they wanted to pay less taxes and that made it easier for the tax cuts Trump and the Republikkkan party forced through. The tea party people may pay slightly less, but Trump's stupid tariffs are a tax.
Yeah calling something capitalist in the real world implies that its greedy, nihilistic and exploitative.
Its a slur where im from
@@PennyDreadful1
I'm curious, whence are you?
@@xCorvus7x Scandinavian.
“This country has socialism for the rich, and rugged individualism for the poor.”-Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr, 1968
52 years later, and we still haven't corrected this?
You can thank the government for that.
Change doesn't happen until it needs to happen. The riots occurring this year are clues to the government that _something_ needs to change so you can bet your ass that lobbyist are lining up to tell them what needs to change.
That's a problem as lobbyists are generally company representatives and don't have the interests of the average individual in mind. Unfortunately the cycle repeats itself until the culture that causes this changes. Any change to culture takes around 2 generations to change. You'll see noticeable change when millennial are in the position baby boomers are today.
Nor will we, there is no practical way given today's technologies.
The bottom 40% pay zero in taxes. The top 4% give (not taken)over 85% of charitable donations.
@@BassenGaming
No, it is the government's fault. They interefered in the market, making it possible for lobbyists to push for such policies. We need to do away with all our "socialist" policies.
Just discovered your channel tonight..love it!
3:58 3% raise in wages + 25% raise in rent DOES = Late stage capitalism
The Church: money bad
Peasants: ok, what should we do with it then?
The Church: Gimme
dragosus Are you busy sorting because there are many great ones? Our real danger is the 2020 scheme going into public schools to brainwash our children. We are getting too close to the end of the book of How Rome Fell. America has great potential to soar and great potential to collapse. Unions that helped in the past are hurting us now.
@@stevenrofe6195 I was making joke for the medieval part of the video, calm down
Antifa & BLM: money bad
Normies: ok, what should we do with it then?
Antifa & BLM: Gimmie Bail money.
Saying the Church says money bad is a misrepresentation of the Christian faith. The bible never says money is bad. Heck it even recommends strategies of how to manage it and invest it.
What the bible says is The "love of money" is bad, meaning Greed. This is because if you love money too much it becomes your God and then you loose sight of the more important things in life.
@@justk.d3706 I dunno, the Catholic church used to be pretty greedy, which was the point of the joke.
I love how you handle volatile subjects and still manage to add humour and objectivity. Bravo sir bravo
I'm about 5 videos in, what an interesting channel! Thank you my friend! ~T.
Such a great topic! Something that definitely needs discussed.. the longer we let it go.. the worst the problem gets.. and further from a viable solution. Would love to see the concept of Nesara and Gesara brought in to this discussion. 👍
Norway checking in here - Capitalism works fine, it just needs the correct amount of reigning in.
Make sure to keep money and politics separated - I think the US has failed there.
Also - probably fix your tax laws - my guess is that they are too complex and have too many holes in them. Keep it simple.
US tax laws are so complex our tax lawyers dont understand them.
If I recall correctly, Norway has a pretty hefty oil fund right? (Purely civil discussion).
Best comment I've seen so far!
I like you
@@haydenarchambault2927 Yes, they do. because they banked it.
Joe: Bring it in group hug.
Me: literally hugs my laptop.
Joe: Oh yeah that's good stuff
Me: steps away from laptop
Also super informative Joe thanks for another great vid keep it up!
Jo Dearwester I needed that hug today! :D
@@mebreevee1997 Hugs from. Yeah I needed it too. I have a "FREE HUGS" t-shirt but since there's a pandemic going on I'm not sure if I'll ever be able to wear that shirt again.
You now have covid.
Dan Cobb Oh thats sad
Shadow Prince Don’t give up hope.
You can always sharpie in “Free in spirit hugs.”
Thank you for helping me with my essay!
One thing I dislike is people treating the idea of ‘taking down capitalism/capitalistic democracy and rebuilding from the ground-up’ as an excuse to almost be complacent and not vote because ‘nothing will change’.
Even if you spoil your ballot, taking part in democracy in some way does help make small steps towards positive change. Because one day the glorious Revolution may come, but right now we still need to fight for the small victories.
“Can capitalism be reformed” is far less important than “will those who are currently on top give up some power to reform, or will they risk everything to maintain their current level of power?”
Crisis in economic systems is hardly new, and capitalism in America survived serious threats during the guildes age and Great Depression through reform. These processes weren’t easy (many labor strikers were killed for their views), but the resulting compromises saved most of the system as-was. There is no particular reason to believe that we can’t reform the system today, the only question is political will.
Begs to question if reform is even needed, or if personal accountability for actions and decisions are taken into account. Capitalism requires that you be a contributor to the system, or you are a casualty of it. Does that make you a victim of the system or you choices? Much of what is put off on others is really a personal choice in how you conduct yourself, your business, and your overall life goals. If your content living in a shack, then so be it. I don’t understand why people settle for this, but then again you are free to be a ‘victim’ of yourself at anytime...
Long Wilderness Walks would you make the same argument about laborers during the Great Depression, or during the gilded age? Why or why not?
@@ForzaJersey eventually the deceptions of the elite will be exposed and they will be massacred. Numerous billionaires have already set up boltholes around the world in places like New Zealand and kept their private jets fully fueled and on standby.
@@ForzaJersey BLM and Antifa are simple misdirections created by the Powerful to distract common folk from the real problems. That's why nobody takes them seriously. They aren't *meant* to be serious threats.
@@longwildernesswalks - There are people who exist who are unable to account for their own actions. A LOT of people, in fact. Some are mentally incapacitated from birth or otherwise, some are physically incapacitated from birth or otherwise, some are just older people with dementia, parkinson's, alzheimer's, etc.
But also, who determines what contributes what to society? For instance, service work (retail, customer service, food service, etc.) is probably one of the most important contributing jobs, but it pays horribly. If you own a distributing warehouse for trading cards, something far less important, you probably make a crapton more than that. Poor examples on my part, maybe, but you could find hundreds more, including some voluntary work that contributes a ton, is considered necessary even, and doesn't pay a cent because it's not profitable.
Don't get me wrong, though. I'm with you on the idea that, for society to run, people need to contribute to it. And for people to contribute, they need an incentive. I'm just against the idea that _everyone_ is needed for this, that the best incentive is money, or that incentive for contribution = not being penalized for not contributing. Balance can be struck through incentive alone.
Joe, my 13 year old son turned me onto this video. I thank you for making it, and for putting it out there for all to watch. I wish every damn person in the country would watch this. You bring up good questions and good possible solutions - all with humor. WELL DONE. ✊🏾
You have a smart kid!
You give Joe a chocolate bar. He has a good head on his shoulders
Please have him also hear the other side.. Listen to Milton Friedman and Thomas Sowell. I would argue Capitalism actually works to empower society. As backwards as it can seem, "social good" is indeed the by-product of capitalism. Consumers "vote" every day with their money. We as society choose which services, goods, and companies deserve our almighty dollar. Do we want a greener future? Then we show it with our wallets, we buy EVs and punish companies making gas guzzlers. Can government help? Yes to a degree. But we have to be truly sure that the anecdote is not worse than the disease - as it so often is.
@@wilethecoyote If we lived in a pure capitalistic society, perhaps capitalism would actually empower society. But since we have welfare capitalism that save companies that wouldn't survive if it weren't for a bail out (or whatever). Hence, those companies are not the "social good" that results from capitalism.
@@ThroughMeToYouPuppetry I actually agree with you. The government and their perverse involvement within industry is almost always the one to blame. Not capitalism. My fear is for the viewers of this that use it to warm up to socialism. We cant have the government decide what "social good" is best for us. We must decide.
I still appreciate that you made thus video , given how uncomfortable it truly is to speak about publicly. Thank you !
Thanks for doing the video!
So here's my current experience: my company was purchased by another, from a complementary side of the industry. Not one employee has benefited, and many have lost their job or seen a large decrease in benefits. My company posted profitable year after profitable year since inception and was in no danger whatsoever. The only ones who benefited were those at the top, controlling it all. This merger/buyout does nothing good for the average citizen either. This is all too common, and just another example of what Joe is talking about.
Mark, this is your boss. You're fired and are now free to seek benefits elsewhere. Congratulations.
@W.A M.P See, Mark believes that risking capital (what employers do) and accepting compensation in exchange for time and labor (what employees do) are the same thing. More precisely, if he's not smart enough to take care of himself...he's probably not smart enough to care of me either. Which is why I fired him.
@W.A M.P First, I'm not sure why you think I feel entitled. I am asking only for job security, when I've spent years working for the company. I'm not asking for money to be dumped on me, and I don't think it is unreasonable to expect that the things I was told were part of my compensation package upon hire should remain as such.
My company was in no financial danger at all, as I stated they have been profitable since inception, nearly 40 years ago. The company had 13000 staff, and was purchased by a company with something very similar.
Several of the points you make sound like you're jaded from your bad experiences owning a business, and at the same time, you make the point that you were the only one to absorb any risk, as is how it works when you own a business. It is shortsighted to assume that I have no concept of what the day to day requirements are for running a business just because I don't run one of my own. I personally have never owned a business, though I helped my father run his for a few years. He has told me on many occasions that if he had it to do over again, he wouldn't. And he isn't the only one I've known to say that. But of course, I wasn't talking about a small business to begin with. I'm talking about a large, multi-national corporation that generated hundred of millions of dollars in annual revenue.
As Joe's point goes, capitalism in and of itself isn't the issue, but the extreme version we see today where all that matters seems to be maximizing profit at the expense of just about everything else is. Your comment about how employees aren't individually important just proves that point. Each of those people who lose their job have a life and possible a family that are relying on them. And replacing a salary isn't an easy task when every company wants to pay you the minimum they can get away with. One cannot equate a job at one company as the a job at another. Sure, if I lose my job I can probably find a job quickly, but it wouldn't be earning nearly what I make right now. You may not be negatively impacted by simply replacing them with another person, probably at a lower wage and maybe in another country - but people matter. Your attitude about them seems to suggest that you don't view employees as people, and THAT is the issue with late stage capitalism. You comment that "
for years, just to benefit one's enormous pile of stock shares provides nothing for anyone but oneself (already a multi-millionaire). How much is enough?
So you would rather the workers control it? sounds like communism to me
@@maryolee8303 Where did I say that?
Interesting fact, the word sabotage comes from the French word sabot, meaning clog/wooden shoe because workers would throw their clog in the machines to break it. This is probably also where the term clogged up machine comes from.
So they had enough money for foot ware to be expendable!!!!!
@@Diggnuts lots of trees around to make new shoes
This reminds me of Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country.
@@Diggnuts I don't think the workers cared.
That actually IS an interesting fact! Thank you!
Love the insights here. Ty!
Just here to say the group hug was adorable 😂💖 so happy I discovered this channel!
By the two most important indicators things are the best they've ever been: bowling averages are way up and minigolf scores are way down.
Excellent
Rufus would be proud.
Party on, dude.
As an American, it's embarrassing that you have to handle my fellow citizens with kid gloves when it comes to stating facts about capitalism.
Right? It's like free speech is good until they say something you don't agree with.
@@thomaswenzel1393 "I'm all for free speech
*BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUT"*
Agreed. There is SO MUCH personal sensitivity around these issues, especially for Americans over 40. Yet, those of us who watched all the factory jobs "disappear" in the eighties and nineties ought to be able to handle the truth. And anyone who refuses to see the end of the Industrial Revolution for what IT IS, needs to go read a book.
@@delirium1643 free speech means that you should get a platform, not that people have to agree with you...
Are "socialists" getting banned or arrested for their views?
Aldous Huxley how could they, they run just about all forms of media and universities at this point.
The fact that we have Amazon Walmart, means our ant-monopoly is not working, it's way to easy for companies to stop any competitive.
You are absolutely right about us having good times now vs other times. I' vs argued is this for years.
"Monarchies were replaced by Monopolies." Wait are you still talking about the late 1800s or are you talking about now? Asking for a friend.
yes
Jeff Bezos wants your location
He's talking about the early 20th century. He even went out of his way to show the disparity difference between J.P. Morgan and Jeff Bezos. We broke those monopolies up. We still do have the issue today, but it's not like it was.
@@carlonryan180 ever heard of the coca-cola beverage company?
the amazon group? nestle food group?
the list goes on and on
@@ollythainrap They're nothing on Standard Oil or the monopolies of those days, or even a little bit later. United Fruit literally took over a whole country.
Honestly people from the USA are WAY to touchy about this subject. To any reasonable person with any economical knowledge it should be obvious that western Europe ALSO has capitalism. They just put more limits on it, and it works out fine. In fact, it probably works better than what they have in the USA.
But noooo, you criticize the specific USA brand of capitalism and they bring out the pitchforks...
Let's compare levels of poverty, education and social mobility and see which approach fares better.
@@MrGonzonator thats an excellent idea. Compare those factors in the Netherlands or Germany to the USA and you come to the conclusion that people in the Netherlands or Germany have it better in all of those statistics.
@@mistrants2745 it _is_ an excellent basis for comparison :)
If you count, or read a graph.
(ref OP for lack of education in the US)
I agree. Americans have been propagandised for the past century to be afraid of cooperation. They are taught to fear socialism because the well being of people is in conflict with the greed of corporations. When your country's government is clearly wholly owned by corporations, when an HMOs profits are more important than your life, when dropping bombs and putting people in prison is profitable, your in denial about how great your system is
@@MrGonzonator That comparison wont do any good to the states. just put US to shame. specially when you factor things like paid maternity leave, paid vacations, healthcare, and so forth
I think corporations need to be cut. There is no reason why the government should take more money from the bottom who barely have enough to survive, than the rich who ride unlimited tax-offs and face no consequences for their blatantly exploitative behaviors
One lesser but also important point: inheritance means that people with no real reason to be wealthy and powerful are regularly becoming wealthy and powerful, and are thereby able to exploit the systems that all such elites are allowed. This leads to the leadership being mostly funded and staffed by people unqualified to do so.
I therefore postulate that if we change the inheritance laws to allow less continuation of unreasonable levels of monetary wealth (say, make it so you can't have significantly more money handed to you from a dead relative than could fund the rest of your singular, individual life), there is one less loop in the overarching cycle of outrageous highs for a handful of people leading to devastating lows for basically everyone in this economic system. That means less suffering on the bottom line, and probably for everyone since humans usually need something to work toward in order to be happy. Without addressing inheritance, all of this is just going to start over again in a generation or so, barring complete economic revolution. I don't think we should want that.
"Dogmatic refusal to change is a losing strategy." Agreed!
we christians have been doing for over 3000 years. were still here and stronger then ever
@@originsdecoded3508 Riggght.. because Christianity today is just like it was then... Right?
@@corymills9171 political and living circumstances have changed. I know what your trying to get at. But
Our faith in one true god has never changed.
starting with the jews, to the catholics, to the christians. theirs but one true God and that is eternal truth never unchanging in our faith and doctrine. so yeah........
his name is Jehova.
@@originsdecoded3508 There hasn't been a true dogmatic refusal to change. in fact, Christianity has branched into many denominations.
Unless you are already doing the right thing... haha
All jibber jabber aside, I just love this video for bringing up the importance of adaptation to circumstances.
Clinging to specific "isms" is never going to work beyond a few generations. Every few generations, humanity needs to update itself on a range of parameters.
and you cant MAKE that happen with violent revolution or abolishing the notion of property. theres adapting, and then theres "the great leap forward."
@@cwg9238 modern socialists, who for example want worker cooperatives, are not state socialists (but want the worker to own the means of production).
As long as they don't use the state to force it, but build these companies themselves as an alternative, I don't see how "socialism" and capitalism are not compatible.
State socialism (authoritarianism) and capitalism are enemies.
Modern socialists and capitalists are not
@@aldoushuxley5953 "As long as they don't use the state to force it, but build these companies themselves"
well, fair enough. most of the rhetoric i hear is about SEIZING the means of production. what entitles one to just walk into a business and demand some ownership of it? you cant even force me to hire you in the first place.
telling people to establish their own means is offensive somehow.
@@cwg9238 Yes, those people are stupid. State socialism/stalinism/maoism is one of the most evil ideologies to ever exist.
The problem with -isms is however, that people use them to mean different things.
Many marxists of today use my definition of a "libertarian" marxism to "fix" issues they see with modern capitalism.
They don't like stalinism either.
(I am not a marxist, but just had a discussion with someone, who considers themselves a libertarian marxist, and I was confused at first too)
I think you did a good job of parsing a topic with a lot of opinions. The Ancient economy was really quite a bit more like ours than people realize when it came to a few major powers enabling certainly the people of the Mediterranean basin and really from Britain to China to focus on their competitive advantages instead of the kind of subsistence living that we associate with the Dark and Middle Ages. The main difference was that social status brought access to resources rather than resources bringing access to social status. The "Late Stage Capitalism" of the Roman Republic was the corruption of the Senate and the rise of populist politics. The bottom line is, that A) the people in your society who have a monopoly on violence, also dictate your economic system. and B) Any system of political-economy is only as good as its ability to root out and prevent corruption. All of these systems are based on stability and confidence in fair play. When enough people are willing to risk ruin or death because they have no confidence in fair play, you have your pitchforks and new folks establish a monopoly on violence and a new social contract.
Great video! Thank you!
Watches "Is This The End Of Capitalism?" gets an ad for eToro :D
Yeah, the title was a question, not an answer, please note the question mark.
eToro adds are so cancerous I sold communism to a few people by saying under communism eToro wont exist.
@philajfran except there is unless you think human civilisation exists to cause humans suffering. The problem is when the free market interacts with unfree markets like China's. It forces us to compete with government industries that can drop their prices to below break-even for a decade to run us into the ground and then price gouge our entire economy.
@@DSiren Yes, but it is amazing how quickly supply chains can be altered, given the will and leadership to do so. We now are the world's largest manufacturer of ventilators; even Ford is making them!!
really ? that's funny. Try AVG ad block a free chrome plug in.
I didn’t know I needed a hug, but thank you ❤️
Same. Thanks, Joe. ❤️
Time to hug you and then sneak a Dill pickle with googly eyes on it into your pocket...
That was my first UA-cam hug ever.
@@georhayy and it felt like my first hug ever
Hugs should be the new world’s currency.
I work 7 days a week in a factory. Yes this is late stage. Here in America we''ve been fighting for the 5 day 40 hour work week since the 1800's. The only reason police forces started was to keep workers in line.
This was terrifying to me. He compared our current situation to the state of the working class of the industrial revolution. There is no comparison. Look how good we have it now! We have a 40 hr work week with required overtime pay. We have child labor laws, OSHA, unemployment benefits, and a massive social safety net. Most jobs include health benefits, paid vacation time, HR departments, maternity and paternity leave, unions, education reimbursements, etc.
And look at the lifestyle of the average American family, it is beyond the wildest dreams of the working class from 100 years ago! Any poor person from all of human history would immediately trade places with a poor person today.
The idea that any kind of socialist reform is going to make life better in this country is nonsense. And that social credit score idea?! That is so freaking scary I can’t even imagine what that could lead to. What trustworthy group of people is going to run it? Is there anyone who trusts politicians and their bureaucratic underlings? Well who else would run that mess? You want a DMV worker to decide whether or not you’ve met your quota of good deeds and get your check this month? Yikes.
This world is full of potential evil dictators that would love for us to tie ourselves down to such a system so they can step in and put a boot on our collective necks. No thank you.
THIS is everything in a nutshell:
"a shift towards solutions and away from ideologies..."
But ideologies are literally just the philosophical frameworks for devising solutions.
Neoliberalism is an ideology too.
Joe: remember guys, living room rules in the comments
Me: *gets out a coaster*
*Take your shows off, stay a while*
I put wheels on my coaster, so I can roll it to any where on my desk without lifting it. A roller coaster, if you will.
...and a pint of cheap whiskey to go with my Natty Light.
@@charleslindeman2169 Dude, well played. Love it
we were in the living room, and one of my now ex-friends told me to get out of his house after I started questioning his "everyone in the US is racist and all problems are caused by racism" narrative a year or so ago
So much of this video makes so much sense!!
"The before time" sounds so post apocalyptic, love it!
You asked what I thought...
I think you just summarized my last 20 years of thinking in a 25 minute video.
Very thought provoking!
Sure... But having being born and raised in Socialism, I rather experience the Evils of Capitalism.
I encourage everyone who hate Capitalism to go live in Socialism for a while. Say, a couple of years.
@@joshanonline You know, it's not a binary choice.
There exist many middl ground options, Mixed Economies.
I favour Market Socialism, with regulated forms of capitalism (in a social democracy framework to prevent abuse of workers) allowed only in industries for luxury goods (and I do mean LUXURY, not just "stuff you don't technically need to survive")
@@mduckernz those are my exact thoughts on the subject.
@@mduckernz That system you claim doesn't work actuallydescribes many countries around the world, to one degree or another.
...but we get told by big business that we have too much regulation.
I wonder why...?
Excellent
Thank you for addressing this issue in such a sober and non-dogmatic way. One of the best videos on the topic I’ve seen.
I'm surprised that some one would talk about an economic system but say so little.
"Capitalism" failed in 2008 but there was enough money to temporarily "save" it, whereas "communism" failed in 1989 because there was no money to "save" it. All "quotations" intentional. What is need is that Maslow's basic needs in his pyramid be a human right - there needs to be a recognition of the concept of "common good". I really enjoyed this video. Well done Joe.
Nice work. Thanks Joe
I believe this video is extremely important and people must watch it with an open mind
Couldn't agree more, friend. I've been trying to nudge people-in my life and even here online-toward examining this system of ours. The problem isn't that capitalism doesn't work. Look no further than most other developed countries where they have universal healthcare, paid leave/vacation, and all the rest. The biggest problem with capitalism in general is that it incentivizes greed.
I don't know where we are going. But we are certainly going there.
Can we make the changes needed in time is the question.
@@thomasridley8675 It's a good question. The question, even. It doesn't seem to be a concern among the highest ranks of either dominant political party though-perhaps because so many are millionaires. It's not unrelated, that's for sure.
Anyway,
I do think we'll pull through, probably by the skin of our teeth. I am an optimist (as often as possible!), so it's kind of just a hunch. But there are some reasons to be hopeful. Like the overwhelming number of young people who know what the problem is & want to change it.
Sorry if that's a bit much, I tend to rant. 😅
@@irighterotica
I have too agree. We have too many stuck in the past.
And it wasn't too much. ✌️
I like freedom of speech. It protects everyone. And that includes everyone you disagree with.
That’s how it should be.
Until big brother thinks you are a threat.Then national security will have to come first
Andersen Zheng and that has some merits to it too. Winston Churchill was an authoritarian mfer but he helped get the rest of the world through ww2, he was kicked out of parliament for obvious reasons during peacetime. Sometimes taking away freedoms offers more safety than the amount of free will lost. You have to strike a good balance, and the ability to adapt to new situations
Communism creates freedom of speach. Thats cause under a classless and stateless society, there are by defenition nobody on the top preventing you from speaking out
@@andersenzheng Not just big brother #cancelculture
@@haider9874 show me an example of that? Never happens that way
Things have certainly shifted between 2020-2023, hasn't it?
Surprising how one Theodore Roosevelt fixed so many things - the economy, capitalism, the ecology.
Every country needs a Ted Roosevelt soon.
Before getting laid off from 'the dark times' I was in the best paid hourly position at my work. TIL I made less than $4 in 1970's money, that's both depressing and enlightening for why I can't afford much.
i just did the math, and i make essentially the same. FML.
What does TIL mean?
Evan Wilkinson what’s the math for it
Kj16V Today I Learned
@@Kj16V TIL = today I learned
"Mentions social credit systems"
Winnie the Pooh likes what he hears.
@Orrin The problem is, a system like this can be exploited way too easy.
@Orrin The problem is, a system like this can be exploited way too easy.
scar0815 Unless we have the kindness police, making sure you stay honest and kind
@@scar0815, and ours isnt being completely abused?
@Orrin Its a tyrannical concept.
The board game Monopoly is a standby rainy day activity. Towards the end when only two players are left its boring for the others who went bust. Then suddenly one player owns the whole board and all the players go out to play in the sun.
Excellent video!