Sneako's argument about Cuties being "realistic" holds no water. You know what else is realistic? Murders. Yet I dont think studios should be literally killing their actors when their character is supposed to die. Child abuse is also very realistic, yet I dont think that other actors (or really anybody) should be literally beating kids for the sake of a movie. Same thing with the sexualization of children. Yes its a very real thing that happens, but that doesnt give studios the right to sexualize their child actor.
@@Joromtohis agreement toward it is very backwards. he says it's not okay, but that he also believes if they didn't do it the movie wouldn't be impactful. so his argument that it's somewhat "ok" for the message of the movie is nonsensical and doesn't hold up
No, he wants to follow the example of his prophet, who married a 6 year old. He is only arguing for 17 because that is significantly easier to argue, and sets up a slippery slope to lower it even further.
Sneiko's point that it was legal to marry someone under 18 for thousands of years makes no sense. It was legal to own slaves or as Charlie said cannibalize in many great civilizations, and both became illegal for a reason. Sneiko is straight up cherrypicking
I would absolutely love to sit down and debate Sneako about trans rights, because from what I’ve gathered he’s very much against it. And the slur dropping is actually insane. That’s not “funny” those terms have been used to harm so many groups of people.
Holy shit Sneako contradicts himself so fucking much. He literally defeats his own argument of "You can't just believe in yourself that incest and pedophilia are wrong" when he was ranting about he believes in islamic values because he believes they are right within himself. I cant remember the verbatim its around the 2-3.5hour mark
@@EL_Fearnot really, charlies arguments here make sense, but it's difficult to understand what he even means sometimes because sneako interrupts him and tries to change his words to go with his narrative
2:28:53 - Sneako saying that two 16 year olds can legally consent to bedroom activities with each other but legally cannot consent to marry until 18 in the U.S. is actually not true. There are jurisdictions in which, with their parents' permission, they *can* get married. In some places, that is the ONLY situation in which the government permits someone to emancipate from their parents. So, not only is his information faulty, it really just negates his entire argument on the reasoning behind the morality of his position. Also, at 2:28:23 - Sneako says that Charlie's belief in 18 being the standard is based on the government setting that standard (i.e., it's the law). But he also says multiple times that it actually is 16 in most U.S. jurisdictions. So...which is it, buddy? You can't play both cards depending on when it is convenient. Is 18 a social convention (i.e., Hollywood pushing it, like he claims much earlier), or is it the law? In your own words buddy, we can't keep changing terms because they have meaning. If we don't abide by those meanings (not just when they are convenient), "society" will "crumble." Moron.
He has so much restraint not to go wildly off path. Sneako seems so weirdly hung up on "kids cutting their dicks off" and Charlie manages to stay on topic even though he's said being trans is ok and sneako says the opposite and just KEEPS bringing it up.
You got people going through puberty at the early ages of 8 for girls and 9 for boys. does that make them physically mature or does that mean that they are now an adult, what the fuck are these arguments?
No rational person argues this hard for blurring age of consent without being a creep. Listening yo sneako continue to be obsessed with that netflix movie and age of consent are just two massive red flags
what is the definition of maturity at that point? what is the basis of maturity? what is the criteria for maturity? mental maturity or physical maturity? how do you test for maturity? because sneako’s logic of consent is so stupid
@@titanicsix7 penguinz0 always wants to satisfy the public view, for example he would always try to be with the majority’s views, now his takes sucked because he said minors (he even said 9 year olds) could consent to PERMANENT gender changing surgery, which afterwards he said he was using metaphors but let’s be real, that was just damage control he really just realized majority of people dont think minors could really consent to both
Honestly, at about an hour in, i can see sneakos logic of "these things happen and should be made aware" because it should, but saying your favourite movie is Cuties and saying its worth it to make these child actresses victims for the sake of pushing your awareness is not right. I think a big contributor on making awareness are the true crime and documentaries, but the directors arent personally putting the kids through this. It already happened, and while the directors cant change the past, they can show the world the horrors of what happens
Sneako did face off against Sean Strickland in a “sparring” match. It wasn’t really that intense throughout, but within the last minute Sean Strickland did go pretty intense and Sneako was able to remain on his feet through that burst. Not saying anything about him, but he surprised Sean.
The whole "Does someone become an adult at 18 or at physical maturity" argument was very frustrating to listen to from both sides, because it could've easily been resolved. A LEGAL adult is someone who is 18 or older. A BIOLOGICAL adult is someone who is past puberty. These are two definitions of adult that are equally correct in their own contexts. Charlie's "adult" is a legal adult, someone over 18. Sneako's "adult" is biological, someone past puberty. Neither of them are wrong with their own definitions within their contexts, but what they both failed to convey is that "adult" can have different meanings depending on the context.
True but their definitions also don't factor in mental maturity. Mental maturity is just as important as physical maturity. Sneako sitting there and saying it is completely ok for a 12 year old (who is physically mature) to marry an 18 year old is absolutely disgusting no matter what definition you use.
@@_Kriptik_oh I absolutely agree with you. Sorry if I came across as thinking that both sides are equally right or wrong with their core point of whether or not a minor should be able to marry, that wasn't my intention. Sneako's criteria for marriage based on the debate is: 1: Be physically mature And... thats about it. It seems like he only really values marriage for the sex. He doesn't seem to care if she is mentally mature, emotionally mature, or since he's religious he should also probably be interested in spiritual maturity in a potential mate but he never gave even a hint of that.
Sneako is correct by his adult definition but he's using that to justify fucking them which is not ok Charlie's "adult" is legal age to do adult things which is infinitely more accurate
i’m not too sure i get this whole “physically mature” statement being thrown around and using that as an excuse to justify underage marriage. almost all around the world 18 is considered and adult because of MENTAL MATURITY. Sure you can choose to marry a 14 year old because she physically looks 23… but you are marrying the mind of a child. i’m so confused
He mentions horror movies also being an unnerving thing to watch, but I feel a missed rebuttal is that horror movies don’t actually harm anyone. No matter the point/ concepts of the movie (good or bad), nobody is actually being tortured/ murdered/ etc. To defend the movies writing while the issue is with its production is, in my opinion, a big strawman just like when he responds to Charlie saying that yes they can use 18 year olds by saying that shows use 30+ year olds for teens and then romanticise/ over-mature that age range. It’s like saying “What do you mean, you don’t like ‘The wizard of Oz for poisoning several lead actors with metallic paints, using asbestos for props, and keeping the lead actress drugged/ starving for the entire production?! The story of a girl in a foreign land trying to find her way home really speaks to me, so I’m going to defend this movie ‘till I’m in the grave!”
I fully believe when you're 20 years old you're an adult it is 5 years before your prefrontal cortex is fully developed and when you're prefrontal cortex is developed witch is the part of your brain that has decision-making skills yes when you're 18 you're an adult but if an 18 year old and a 70 year old we're going out hell maybe even a 30 year old was going out with an 18 year old they would think it's icky and gross and that they were dating a child 20 to 21 is that sweet spot where most people would say that you're not dating a child anymore now teens will be teens that's why I'm saying they can go out with someone within a year as someone who's been assaulted by people that are older than me by 3 years older than me in my teens which is the Romeo and Juliet law in my state 12 months is a good ground
the Romeo and Juliet law only applies if the two individuals were already in a relationship back when they were minors and one became 18 before the other. (e.g: A couple starts dating at 16 and 14, time passes and it becomes 18 and 16. That would be protected because it was not a new thing. However, if they had only JUST started their relationship at 18 and 16, it would not be legal.)
I usually agree 100% with Charlie especially with the marriage part, but I do think it’s Ironic that he says a child can permanently alter their body with consent from their parents but can’t get married with all around consent.
he explained that he thought sneako was being hyperbolic - there is no country in the world where a child can get gender affirming surgery. transition for children is literally just changing names and wearing different clothes. it's fully reversible
@@wormsvvorth Absolutely. Coming from a ftm guy, it was therapy (originally for depression), changing clothes and hair, and I only got hormone therapy once I was a legal adult. Same with top surgery.
I do wanna say, Charlie said in a follow up video that he doesn't actually believe that, and thought Sneako would take it as a joke. I promise you, there is not a place in the damn world where a child under 18 can get any kind of sex change surgery. The ONLY thing that is available to minors when it comes to gender affirming care (and this isn't for everywhere, in the U.S it's mainly blue states) is taking testosterone or estrogen. And even then, that is FULLY reversible as if they go off of T or estrogen, their body will naturally return to the normal hormonal levels for whatever their body naturally produces.
Tbf, Charlie has said that he's not a debater and prefers conversations, which is understandable. Conversations allow for better understanding as you talk to each other whereas a debate is simply a game of who can spit out the most points even if your position is something that no sane person would agree with. To Charlie's credit, Sneako sucks even worse at debates and the proof of that is here. Plus, arguing with brainrotted people like Sneako will have you become dumber as you continue to speak to them. So it's really no surprise Charlie wasn't doing well here. "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"
Sneako's point: someone changes their gender and no one bats an eye... But when a 25 year old man wants to marry a 12 year old, everybody loses their minds!
Or more like how can a child consent to life changing surgery when they not adults and don't have clear understanding of sexuality yet but they cannot marry , it is contradictory to believe a child can't consent to marriage at their age but they can consent to changing their gender for life .
@@Vincent-cm3mp I’m quite literally stating sneakos and Charlie’s standings were dumb children shouldn’t be able to consent to permanent gender changing surgery along with marrying a adult
I love Charlie, but he's talking out of both sides of his mouth on the transitioning child thing... He sorta doubled down and contradicted himself when Sneako asked him if he was a kid and Charlie said 'no because I'd be a child; I wouldn't understand.' (Or something to that effect.) If he's gonna be for it. Fine. Just be consistant in reasoning. I agree with him on everything else, though.
Almost everything sneako’s saying is wrong (or didn’t change anything) but the trans thing and the other way around for penguinz0. There does need to be a line and 18 is a good number and I don’t know if Charlie just doesn’t wanna get the hate but no someone under 18 should not cut off there d*ck, you shouldn’t really every but do whatever you want after your 18 if your not smart enough to not do it then then most likely nothings gonna change but you shouldn’t be able to make any permanent change like that as a kid just the same as a tattoo except obviously one is a lot bigger then the other. (No hate but for the idea sneako is pushing for and the trans thing and take with a grain of salt only 3 hours in)
charlie lowkey cringe this whole argument sneako clearly gets under his skin and is literally malding while sneako doesnt even give a fk what charlie thinks about him end of the day, im a fan of charlie but its just sad to see
Sneako's argument about Cuties being "realistic" holds no water. You know what else is realistic? Murders. Yet I dont think studios should be literally killing their actors when their character is supposed to die. Child abuse is also very realistic, yet I dont think that other actors (or really anybody) should be literally beating kids for the sake of a movie. Same thing with the sexualization of children. Yes its a very real thing that happens, but that doesnt give studios the right to sexualize their child actor.
Fact, Sneako's a fucking weirdo for that take ngl
and he doesnt agree with it ?
@@Joromtohis agreement toward it is very backwards. he says it's not okay, but that he also believes if they didn't do it the movie wouldn't be impactful. so his argument that it's somewhat "ok" for the message of the movie is nonsensical and doesn't hold up
bro acts like as if Cannibal Holocaust is a masterpiece.
Funny enough, I used to think when I was a kid that when characters in movies die, so do the actors LOL
i didn’t even know there was enough drama to make a 4 hour video
nah FR
Oh my god. Goober. You are my savior.
"We need to set terms" "A child is under 18"... "YOU NEVER DEFINED WHAT A CHILD IS!!!!!!"
The literal definition of a child is a young human being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority.
No, he wants to follow the example of his prophet, who married a 6 year old. He is only arguing for 17 because that is significantly easier to argue, and sets up a slippery slope to lower it even further.
@@boomer.beasley misinformation
Sneako really just sounds like he wants to marry a 17 year old
At least he doesn’t want kids switching their gender.
@@Allahuakbar2001do you actually think kids getting SA’d is better than them being trans 😭 go feel the sun on your skin you bridge troll
Idk maybe he’s just defending a friend again😂
@@Allahuakbar2001 you’re username explains you’re behavior perfectly 😂
@@Allahuakbar2001 ngl i FULLY agree wit u but sneako sneako is still a looser
Sneiko's point that it was legal to marry someone under 18 for thousands of years makes no sense. It was legal to own slaves or as Charlie said cannibalize in many great civilizations, and both became illegal for a reason. Sneiko is straight up cherrypicking
Batman V Superman has got nothing on this rivalry.
I would absolutely love to sit down and debate Sneako about trans rights, because from what I’ve gathered he’s very much against it. And the slur dropping is actually insane. That’s not “funny” those terms have been used to harm so many groups of people.
Notice how he also misgendered Ava Tyson in the debate. Not sure if that was intentional or not
Shut up bro
@@Brizzletherizzle your bummy bro
@@Brizzletherizzle erm okay? 😭😭
Lmao fr, though he’d probably switch up on you mid convo 😭
Holy shit Sneako contradicts himself so fucking much. He literally defeats his own argument of "You can't just believe in yourself that incest and pedophilia are wrong" when he was ranting about he believes in islamic values because he believes they are right within himself. I cant remember the verbatim its around the 2-3.5hour mark
Both Charlie and sneakonare dumb
@@EL_Fearnah just stinko the predator
@@KingOfGaymes both are
@@EL_Fearnot really, charlies arguments here make sense, but it's difficult to understand what he even means sometimes because sneako interrupts him and tries to change his words to go with his narrative
@toastinoss Charlie’s arguing the minors can consent to permanent gender changing surgery examples like testicles removed etc
2:28:53 - Sneako saying that two 16 year olds can legally consent to bedroom activities with each other but legally cannot consent to marry until 18 in the U.S. is actually not true. There are jurisdictions in which, with their parents' permission, they *can* get married. In some places, that is the ONLY situation in which the government permits someone to emancipate from their parents. So, not only is his information faulty, it really just negates his entire argument on the reasoning behind the morality of his position.
Also, at 2:28:23 - Sneako says that Charlie's belief in 18 being the standard is based on the government setting that standard (i.e., it's the law). But he also says multiple times that it actually is 16 in most U.S. jurisdictions. So...which is it, buddy? You can't play both cards depending on when it is convenient. Is 18 a social convention (i.e., Hollywood pushing it, like he claims much earlier), or is it the law?
In your own words buddy, we can't keep changing terms because they have meaning. If we don't abide by those meanings (not just when they are convenient), "society" will "crumble." Moron.
Charlie’s takes sucked as well
Charlie has the patience of a saint..good lord 🤣🤣
a 4 hour video on drama is crazy
I love these, one feedback id like to add is to add timestamps with the titles of the videos, other than that, nice comp
Sneako is a joke
He has so much restraint not to go wildly off path. Sneako seems so weirdly hung up on "kids cutting their dicks off" and Charlie manages to stay on topic even though he's said being trans is ok and sneako says the opposite and just KEEPS bringing it up.
You got people going through puberty at the early ages of 8 for girls and 9 for boys. does that make them physically mature or does that mean that they are now an adult, what the fuck are these arguments?
No rational person argues this hard for blurring age of consent without being a creep. Listening yo sneako continue to be obsessed with that netflix movie and age of consent are just two massive red flags
what is the definition of maturity at that point? what is the basis of maturity? what is the criteria for maturity? mental maturity or physical maturity? how do you test for maturity? because sneako’s logic of consent is so stupid
biology
I mean both takes sucked
@@EL_Fear how did Penguinz0 "takes" suck?
@@titanicsix7 penguinz0 always wants to satisfy the public view, for example he would always try to be with the majority’s views, now his takes sucked because he said minors (he even said 9 year olds) could consent to PERMANENT gender changing surgery, which afterwards he said he was using metaphors but let’s be real, that was just damage control he really just realized majority of people dont think minors could really consent to both
Thank you Mr.Goober ive been wanting to know
i love your videos so much i got high as fuck and told all my friends about you
Goober loves you back :D
The second he said “wokeness” he lost any validity he could’ve had 💀
Listening to sneako makes me feel dumber every second..
This dude is just the type of guy that wants to be rebel against everything
To get that rebel vibe even if it damns him and makes him look stupid
Honestly, at about an hour in, i can see sneakos logic of "these things happen and should be made aware" because it should, but saying your favourite movie is Cuties and saying its worth it to make these child actresses victims for the sake of pushing your awareness is not right. I think a big contributor on making awareness are the true crime and documentaries, but the directors arent personally putting the kids through this. It already happened, and while the directors cant change the past, they can show the world the horrors of what happens
Charlie was fully right on all topics but boy is he a TERRIBLE debater. This was an agonizing watch
No Charlie wasn’t same with sneako
Charlie in a house coat is such a 😩
This could stop the worldhunger thanks brother hahaha
Bro this boutta get me through an entire shift at work
Same
Thx goober for this
This is gonna be fire
Very good compilation
Sneako did face off against Sean Strickland in a “sparring” match. It wasn’t really that intense throughout, but within the last minute Sean Strickland did go pretty intense and Sneako was able to remain on his feet through that burst. Not saying anything about him, but he surprised Sean.
Off topic, but hearing Charlie say "Pee yew, you stink." in 31:29 is hilarious to me and idk why
Both Charlie and Sneako are wrong in one aspect: Below 18 does not mean child. It goes infant, toddler, child, teen, adult. Below 18 means minor.
this is a banger
The whole "Does someone become an adult at 18 or at physical maturity" argument was very frustrating to listen to from both sides, because it could've easily been resolved. A LEGAL adult is someone who is 18 or older. A BIOLOGICAL adult is someone who is past puberty. These are two definitions of adult that are equally correct in their own contexts. Charlie's "adult" is a legal adult, someone over 18. Sneako's "adult" is biological, someone past puberty. Neither of them are wrong with their own definitions within their contexts, but what they both failed to convey is that "adult" can have different meanings depending on the context.
True but their definitions also don't factor in mental maturity. Mental maturity is just as important as physical maturity. Sneako sitting there and saying it is completely ok for a 12 year old (who is physically mature) to marry an 18 year old is absolutely disgusting no matter what definition you use.
@@_Kriptik_oh I absolutely agree with you. Sorry if I came across as thinking that both sides are equally right or wrong with their core point of whether or not a minor should be able to marry, that wasn't my intention. Sneako's criteria for marriage based on the debate is:
1: Be physically mature
And... thats about it. It seems like he only really values marriage for the sex. He doesn't seem to care if she is mentally mature, emotionally mature, or since he's religious he should also probably be interested in spiritual maturity in a potential mate but he never gave even a hint of that.
buddy my friend started her period when she was in middle school. I'm pretty sure her body isn't mature enough
Ok we all know 17 is the legal age relax bud 13 in Japan oh yeah
Sneako is correct by his adult definition but he's using that to justify fucking them which is not ok Charlie's "adult" is legal age to do adult things which is infinitely more accurate
12:09 the best opener
Did sneako completely forget that he was the one who said he wasn’t going to bother with terms like ephebophile?? That’s insanely frustrating 😂
14:00 The moment you’ve all been waiting for
It is scary how so many people lack this much self awareness. He has to be the most spineless "alpha male" on the entire internet
2:20:39 the moment moust critical lost the final battle to sneako
Timestamps with the video titles would be pog af.
14:00 the best line in history
i’m not too sure i get this whole “physically mature” statement being thrown around and using that as an excuse to justify underage marriage. almost all around the world 18 is considered and adult because of MENTAL MATURITY. Sure you can choose to marry a 14 year old because she physically looks 23… but you are marrying the mind of a child. i’m so confused
Oh wow, gonna listen to this dunrning the car ride
This Beef all got started because Sneako could not take a joke from Charlie when he made fun off his friends lmao! 😆
WOOO YEAH BABY
He mentions horror movies also being an unnerving thing to watch, but I feel a missed rebuttal is that horror movies don’t actually harm anyone. No matter the point/ concepts of the movie (good or bad), nobody is actually being tortured/ murdered/ etc.
To defend the movies writing while the issue is with its production is, in my opinion, a big strawman just like when he responds to Charlie saying that yes they can use 18 year olds by saying that shows use 30+ year olds for teens and then romanticise/ over-mature that age range.
It’s like saying “What do you mean, you don’t like ‘The wizard of Oz for poisoning several lead actors with metallic paints, using asbestos for props, and keeping the lead actress drugged/ starving for the entire production?! The story of a girl in a foreign land trying to find her way home really speaks to me, so I’m going to defend this movie ‘till I’m in the grave!”
I so badly wanna hear Charlie yell at this freak. He talks over him so much, it's annoying!
Adolph Extensions
Few month training you'll kick his ass Charlie
No way this is all sneako bro jesus
2:20:39 ngl i do not agree with charlie here. That is pretty dumb, you as a child is not developed enough to make that decision at all
Damn wtf, I am surprised he agrees with that madness
I fully believe when you're 20 years old you're an adult it is 5 years before your prefrontal cortex is fully developed and when you're prefrontal cortex is developed witch is the part of your brain that has decision-making skills yes when you're 18 you're an adult but if an 18 year old and a 70 year old we're going out hell maybe even a 30 year old was going out with an 18 year old they would think it's icky and gross and that they were dating a child 20 to 21 is that sweet spot where most people would say that you're not dating a child anymore now teens will be teens that's why I'm saying they can go out with someone within a year as someone who's been assaulted by people that are older than me by 3 years older than me in my teens which is the Romeo and Juliet law in my state 12 months is a good ground
the Romeo and Juliet law only applies if the two individuals were already in a relationship back when they were minors and one became 18 before the other.
(e.g: A couple starts dating at 16 and 14, time passes and it becomes 18 and 16. That would be protected because it was not a new thing. However, if they had only JUST started their relationship at 18 and 16, it would not be legal.)
If morality wasn’t subject to change over time, Islam wouldn’t even exist bc God would have gotten it right with the Old Testament
why does charlie blink so much?
These videos remind me of CodyKo sooo much
I usually agree 100% with Charlie especially with the marriage part, but I do think it’s Ironic that he says a child can permanently alter their body with consent from their parents but can’t get married with all around consent.
he explained that he thought sneako was being hyperbolic - there is no country in the world where a child can get gender affirming surgery. transition for children is literally just changing names and wearing different clothes. it's fully reversible
@@wormsvvorth Absolutely. Coming from a ftm guy, it was therapy (originally for depression), changing clothes and hair, and I only got hormone therapy once I was a legal adult. Same with top surgery.
@@wormsvvorthbe honest no fucking Charlie didn’t he didn’t think that
I do wanna say, Charlie said in a follow up video that he doesn't actually believe that, and thought Sneako would take it as a joke. I promise you, there is not a place in the damn world where a child under 18 can get any kind of sex change surgery. The ONLY thing that is available to minors when it comes to gender affirming care (and this isn't for everywhere, in the U.S it's mainly blue states) is taking testosterone or estrogen. And even then, that is FULLY reversible as if they go off of T or estrogen, their body will naturally return to the normal hormonal levels for whatever their body naturally produces.
@ he’s lying, he fucked up and tried to damage control
"Clickbaited by the poster". Hold up.
You should've included Sneako's responses IMO. I understand they're on Rumble but still, they shouldn't be hard to find.
honestly charlie was not looking good in that long debate
how do?
so?*
Tbf, Charlie has said that he's not a debater and prefers conversations, which is understandable. Conversations allow for better understanding as you talk to each other whereas a debate is simply a game of who can spit out the most points even if your position is something that no sane person would agree with. To Charlie's credit, Sneako sucks even worse at debates and the proof of that is here.
Plus, arguing with brainrotted people like Sneako will have you become dumber as you continue to speak to them. So it's really no surprise Charlie wasn't doing well here.
"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"
Sneako's point: someone changes their gender and no one bats an eye...
But when a 25 year old man wants to marry a 12 year old, everybody loses their minds!
Charlie’s was also dumb
Or more like how can a child consent to life changing surgery when they not adults and don't have clear understanding of sexuality yet but they cannot marry , it is contradictory to believe a child can't consent to marriage at their age but they can consent to changing their gender for life .
Who even are you bro? You're just straight a hater charlie is literally just having common sense@@EL_Fear
@@Vincent-cm3mp I’m quite literally stating sneakos and Charlie’s standings were dumb children shouldn’t be able to consent to permanent gender changing surgery along with marrying a adult
brother am i bored to listen to sneako, he sounds like a flat earth conspiracy theorist
He’s acting like a women trying to force the truth and trying to raise his voice higher then penguinz and he swears he’s a man😂
2:53:18 "I have heard so many words from you" yes its called a conversation
I love Charlie, but he's talking out of both sides of his mouth on the transitioning child thing... He sorta doubled down and contradicted himself when Sneako asked him if he was a kid and Charlie said 'no because I'd be a child; I wouldn't understand.' (Or something to that effect.) If he's gonna be for it. Fine. Just be consistant in reasoning. I agree with him on everything else, though.
Almost everything sneako’s saying is wrong (or didn’t change anything) but the trans thing and the other way around for penguinz0. There does need to be a line and 18 is a good number and I don’t know if Charlie just doesn’t wanna get the hate but no someone under 18 should not cut off there d*ck, you shouldn’t really every but do whatever you want after your 18 if your not smart enough to not do it then then most likely nothings gonna change but you shouldn’t be able to make any permanent change like that as a kid just the same as a tattoo except obviously one is a lot bigger then the other. (No hate but for the idea sneako is pushing for and the trans thing and take with a grain of salt only 3 hours in)
Crit failed the arguements.
I may or may not be the first person to comment on this video.
Wow.
Is sneako transphobic? 😭
charlie lowkey cringe this whole argument sneako clearly gets under his skin and is literally malding while sneako doesnt even give a fk what charlie thinks about him end of the day, im a fan of charlie but its just sad to see
Bro can't tell the difference between a kid and an adult. Scary... Hide yo kids
2:28:58 "what the fuck... no."