Chopin, since he was a child, never really put extreme effort into practising the piano, and he was never really drilled by anyone. He was exceptionally gifted with dexterity and body coordination (including fine motor skills of his hands) additionally to very high intelligence which gave him the ability to learn rapidly without trying too hard. He also was, to a certain degree, lazy by nature and a modest man with only little ego. So, he simply didn't care enough to become a pianist-god. If he had practised the piano 10h+ a day like Liszt did in his younger years, he would have been the Paganini of the piano. I do love Liszt too, as a musician, composer and teacher and even though we sadly have no recordings, he probably was a spectacular one-of-a-kind pianist. But Chopin was the much more naturally gifted musician of the two, Liszt knew that. If Chopin had lived at least as long as Beethoven... *sigh*
@Seleuce chopin chose 2 routes with his music and how to impress an audience when playing and that was with virtuosity and interpretation, with his hardest piece outside of a sonata or concerto being the allegro de concert that shows what chopin was truly capable off and it employs alot of liszts techniques with octaves and especially jumps of course chopin wrote alot of virtuosic pieces, but as his health got worse he probably would struggle doing that as much so that's probably why he chose interpretation because chopin knew that could equal virtuosity in his music and even he himself said that to interpret his nocturnes perfectly would be harder than his etudes, but who really knows at the end of the day but for sure these 2 composers would be better (mainly liszt) than the average concert pianist of today not entirely sure of chopin maybe just slightly
@@RhodesyYT You said in other words what I said in short: He simply had no interest in becoming a technical virtuoso, it wasn't his priority. From everything I know about his personality and talents I believe he could have if he had wanted to.
That's hard to believe, in light of the fact that Liszt (who was a year younger) outlived Chopin by 37 years: you surely meant it the other way around -- with Chopin being the one who influenced Liszt as a composer.
Thanks for watching! If you enjoyed this video and want more piano classical visuals, please like and subscribe for future updates.
Mozart and Beethoven next time like two enemy
I’m now a HUGE fan of these vids, hope this channel grows well! Btw u earned yourself a sub
Hi
Nice video!
What a fun channel! This deserves to be discovered more
It looks like the channel is growing fast!
Chopin probably could have played most of liszts music but that would have pushed his limits and he would find it 'vulgar' to do so
Chopin, since he was a child, never really put extreme effort into practising the piano, and he was never really drilled by anyone. He was exceptionally gifted with dexterity and body coordination (including fine motor skills of his hands) additionally to very high intelligence which gave him the ability to learn rapidly without trying too hard. He also was, to a certain degree, lazy by nature and a modest man with only little ego. So, he simply didn't care enough to become a pianist-god. If he had practised the piano 10h+ a day like Liszt did in his younger years, he would have been the Paganini of the piano.
I do love Liszt too, as a musician, composer and teacher and even though we sadly have no recordings, he probably was a spectacular one-of-a-kind pianist. But Chopin was the much more naturally gifted musician of the two, Liszt knew that. If Chopin had lived at least as long as Beethoven... *sigh*
@Seleuce chopin chose 2 routes with his music and how to impress an audience when playing and that was with virtuosity and interpretation, with his hardest piece outside of a sonata or concerto being the allegro de concert that shows what chopin was truly capable off and it employs alot of liszts techniques with octaves and especially jumps of course chopin wrote alot of virtuosic pieces, but as his health got worse he probably would struggle doing that as much so that's probably why he chose interpretation because chopin knew that could equal virtuosity in his music and even he himself said that to interpret his nocturnes perfectly would be harder than his etudes, but who really knows at the end of the day but for sure these 2 composers would be better (mainly liszt) than the average concert pianist of today not entirely sure of chopin maybe just slightly
@@RhodesyYT You said in other words what I said in short: He simply had no interest in becoming a technical virtuoso, it wasn't his priority. From everything I know about his personality and talents I believe he could have if he had wanted to.
곡 이름좀요 (전부다)
No
@@warrenhepburn9285 Racist ‼️‼️‼️
Heroic Polonaise and Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2
@@therealransu 인트로는 무슨곡인지 아세요?
@@하잉바잉 여전히 Liszt의 헝가리 랩소디 2번입니다.
Chopin sonatas are harder than hungarian Rhapsody 2
Isn't that like comparing apples and oranges?
like
To those who didnt know, Franz Liszt is the one who influenced Chopin.
And mozart’s rival was liszts’ teacher
I think they influenced each other😊
FYI, the duo influenced each other as they were great friends hanging out in Parisian salons. From Wikipedia on Frederic Chopin
That's hard to believe, in light of the fact that Liszt (who was a year younger) outlived Chopin by 37 years: you surely meant it the other way around -- with Chopin being the one who influenced Liszt as a composer.