in autosamal recessive it cant be Bb ..like you said it works ..it dosent ..cuz if it was Bb the other 2 will be infected but that pedigree shows uninfected
AK LECTURES You mentioned that half-filled circle/square represents carrier and in your second assumption @8:47 in the 2nd and 3rd individuals you wrote a possibility for a carrier in their non-filled shape.
After the first iteration, it is established that grandfather 2 must be a non-carrier. So, the second set of assumptions starting at 9:10 should begin with this information.
Please also create a lecture series on BioInformatics.................your way of explaining things and quality of content is really awesome to say the least.........................GOD bless you!
You tell that it also could be in case of Bb...but if it contains Bb it produces bb which is affected(autosomal recessive} ..but in case of 1st generation there are no Affected children..so it could not be bb...
Hands down one of the best professors I have ever had! Thank you so much
you are part of my success. you are part of my lectures
Watching this in 2019 for my upcoming DAT.
I can't thank you enough..
Thank you so much my online prof!
watched other videos on this, you're the only one that has explained it properly. Thank you
Wow i never knew how to do this stuff until this video your explanations is seriously the holy grail
Just love your method of teaching and explaining things in such detail..thank you so much!
in autosamal recessive it cant be Bb ..like you said it works ..it dosent ..cuz if it was Bb the other 2 will be infected but that pedigree shows uninfected
Wow.. you are an awesome teacher! Thanks for posting this and all of your videos! You have explained genetics in a way that is easy to understand!
Damn you saved me! Well explained video that tells how to find whether a trait is dominant, recessive, autosomal or x linked...
absolutely amazing video
AK LECTURES You mentioned that half-filled circle/square represents carrier and in your second assumption @8:47 in the 2nd and 3rd individuals you wrote a possibility for a carrier in their non-filled shape.
Ahhh Fada!!!
U be odugu oh😀
Thanks sir🙌🏽🙌🏽
You have made me understood pedigree than my teacher did
Your videos are the best!
I cant thank you enough man. You made it very simple to understand. cheers.
Thanx aloot!!! You are really helping me out with Genetics ... :)
rahul meena awesome! :)
You are the best teacher!!
So great lectures, thank you so much
What a solid explanation! Well done! 👍🏻
After the first iteration, it is established that grandfather 2 must be a non-carrier. So, the second set of assumptions starting at 9:10 should begin with this information.
Thank you so much, great video
Please also create a lecture series on BioInformatics.................your way of explaining things and quality of content is really awesome to say the least.........................GOD bless you!
Hello
I am from 2030
Do you need to assume whether a pedigree shows a sex-linked / autosomal disease before you can assume whether that disease is recessive or dominant?
great help as always ... thank you so much!!
on min 11;29 how is that consistent with whats being presented on the pedigree,if any offspring was bb wouldnt they have the disease?iam confused!
that was exactly my thoughts in autosomal ressecive i think it is supposed to express the disease when is bb
ur a good man
Wowers this was great!
watching this in 2017 - thank you
thanks a lot , it was a real help!👌
did you go to college? or is this all self-taught information?
Your so good
Thank you.
You tell that it also could be in case of Bb...but if it contains Bb it produces bb which is affected(autosomal recessive} ..but in case of 1st generation there are no Affected children..so it could not be bb...
If Autosomal Recessive, wouldn't the F1 generation be carriers?
thanks sir
seriously why is the audio so low? Common for fuck sakes
❤👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
thank you sir