SCHOPENHAUER - Metaphysics, Love, and Sex

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лют 2025
  • HOW TO SUPPORT THE SHOW?
    ▶️ ON BUY ME A COFFEE: buymeacoffee.c...
    ▶️ ON PATREON: / thepreceptor
    ----------------------------------
    📏 Despised by his contemporaries, Arthur Schopenhauer offered us a vision of human nature both profound and haunting. To him, humanity is nothing more than an instrument of the world’s will, endlessly striving to perpetuate itself through time. Pessimistic, you say? Let’s delve into that…
    #philosophy #schopenhauer #love
    ----------------------------------
    👨🏻‍🏫 WHO IS "THE PRECEPTOR"?
    With a master's degree in philosophy, Charles Robin spent over a decade as a private tutor. In 2024, he launched the channel "The Preceptor" to share his passion for philosophy.
    ----------------------------------
    🎨 CREDITS:
    🎼 Outro music - Charles Robin / Vincent Lopez-Giraud - "Experience"

КОМЕНТАРІ • 156

  • @ThePreceptorPhilosophy
    @ThePreceptorPhilosophy  Місяць тому +13

    What about you? Do you agree with Schopenhauer? Share your thoughts in the comments!

    • @antoineleedolliole7549
      @antoineleedolliole7549 Місяць тому +1

      Not entirety. A circle represents infinite time like a figure 8.
      The astrological sun symbol/target symbol represents inner and outer..
      A lot of thing you say can't be grasped mentally are perfectly clear with not too much imagination.
      A big dot near a little dot represents what we consider creators and creations just fine in cases where one has been exposed to enough different types of information somehow.

    • @Arthur69Schopenhauer
      @Arthur69Schopenhauer 29 днів тому +5

      Of course. I’m the truth.

    • @ursulaschlapbach311
      @ursulaschlapbach311 27 днів тому +2

      I like Schopenhauer ❤

    • @isatousarr7044
      @isatousarr7044 23 дні тому +1

      While Schopenhauer’s perspective on love and sex is undeniably thought-provoking, I find it difficult to align entirely with his pessimistic outlook. Life is so much more than a blind, striving force of the Will. I believe in love, not as a mere biological mechanism, but as a profound and transformative connection that brings joy, meaning, and purpose to our lives.
      Love, for me, is a celebration of our humanity-an experience that transcends the purely physical or utilitarian. It is about companionship, shared dreams, and the beauty of vulnerability. While desire and attraction may have roots in nature’s drive for survival, they are also capable of evolving into something far more profound. Love is the spark that inspires art, compassion, and courage, helping us rise above life’s struggles rather than merely enduring them.
      Joy, too, is an essential part of the human experience. Schopenhauer might have focused on suffering and dissatisfaction, but I see life as a dance between challenges and triumphs. Joy can be found in the small, fleeting moments-a smile, a kind word, the warmth of the sun on your face. These are reminders that life, despite its imperfections, is a gift worth cherishing.
      While I respect Schopenhauer’s deep exploration of metaphysics and his attempt to uncover life’s hidden truths, I believe his view leaves out the richness of love and joy. These are not just escapes from suffering-they are integral to the human spirit, lifting us beyond survival to truly living.

  • @MlOWiLL641
    @MlOWiLL641 22 дні тому +21

    Well put. Nothing but illusions placed on us to convince us to keep playing the game.

    • @jim-se5xc
      @jim-se5xc 8 днів тому

      ua-cam.com/video/5BmwYxePiyo/v-deo.htmlsi=sqg_lmNSZU9mPZKv

  • @caffiend.
    @caffiend. Місяць тому +30

    Schopenhauer also said it this way about not having free will.
    "You can do what you will but you cannot will what you will".
    The will is a result of causes and conditions out of our control.

  • @alirk
    @alirk 29 днів тому +16

    Literally the best video I've watched for a long long time simple and elaborated

  • @touresalif1362
    @touresalif1362 Місяць тому +34

    I certainly agree with Cchopenhauer. I have always asked highly educated and intelligent people the question "What is the purpose of life" and none of them seem to know the answer.

    • @antoineleedolliole7549
      @antoineleedolliole7549 Місяць тому +10

      There is no one answer. Think bout it a little harder....
      What kind of life? A squirrel? A human?
      What gender is the creature? How does it feel?
      Nutshell answer is It's case by case.

    • @anotherindividual5799
      @anotherindividual5799 29 днів тому +6

      Growth

    • @RemoTschopp
      @RemoTschopp 29 днів тому +10

      From unity/love we came to the test of duality.
      We must return to love/unity.
      This is the journey of the soul which we call life. The meaning is always within itself.

    • @LitCentralMillennialXLIII
      @LitCentralMillennialXLIII 29 днів тому +7

      No purpose, truly random and absurd.

    • @kimsuncha
      @kimsuncha 29 днів тому +2

      no mandatory purpose but treat others (all moving life beings) as yourself is our nature. we all live through others, you and I and someone else as one

  • @aleidacubides7751
    @aleidacubides7751 Місяць тому +10

    thanks from Bogotá-Colombia. let's enjoy the ride, it doesn't last long enough to feel it.

  • @konvikted_fellin8253
    @konvikted_fellin8253 28 днів тому +14

    See the thing is is there's a big difference between love and unconditional love they are not the same thing Love is egotistic unconditional love has no ego 0:12

    • @ankchak
      @ankchak 24 дні тому +1

      Jiddu Krishnamurti made this amply clear when he said :
      "The idea is not love. The idea, the word is not love. But only when you have seen the whole movement of desire, attachment, pleasure, then out of that depth of perception comes this strange flower with its extraordinary perfume. That is love."

    • @twatsfya906
      @twatsfya906 16 днів тому +1

      Bro ist gibt keine Bedingungslos Liebe. Deine Mutter liebt dich weil du ihr Kind bist 😊

    • @daraabdullah293
      @daraabdullah293 10 днів тому

      Unconditional love means your partner can do whatever they like to do even if they cheat you still love them. Wrong I don't do Unconditional love if my partner cheat or do something wrong I tell them to get out . And it's boring there's no challenges in Unconditional love .

  • @hardwiredtoself-destructio7614
    @hardwiredtoself-destructio7614 13 днів тому +4

    This world is a narcissistic prison.

  • @jameswaldon5837
    @jameswaldon5837 Місяць тому +7

    The analogy to Keyser Soze was brilliant. It brought clarity and ironically I recently watched that movie (Usual Suspects), so the concept of the shapeshifting deceiver and monster is spot on. Very interesting this will guy.

  • @joeblow9891
    @joeblow9891 Місяць тому +6

    Thank you Charles !
    I must have listened to all your French episodes, but I still really like this new English channel.
    Even if it can be hard to find a meaningful life, loving people make that life purposeful, to care, help and love others, not necessarily only those we deeply love.
    I enjoyed this episode on Schopenhauer, but I won't see life as he did, I don't think we should stop the endless reproducing and there's something beautiful at getting over suffering, when life gave you that opportunity(some suffers all their life and I have a lot of empathy for them) to enjoy life more than suffering from it. I don't have kids just because I didn't have the opportunity to unite with the right woman yet and I decide I wouldn't reproduce just to do it, it has to be with someone I truly love and that I think that even if we eventually break up, we would be able to stay united by friendship and being the parents of that/these kids. Too many made kids without taking the responsibilities that comes with it, so better not replicate the cycle if it's not to fully care and love those kids. Now, many makes kids just for the financial allocation that comes with multiple kids, I know many of those guys, who doesn't spend much time educating their kids, but they spend the allocation money, cause they made kid mostly for this reason.

  • @Pewsartems
    @Pewsartems 24 дні тому +3

    The first philosophy video I've watched this 2025. New subsctiber here, keep up the good work pal!
    Simple and elaborate ❤️

  • @The916Swa
    @The916Swa 27 днів тому +11

    life is empty and meaningless and it is empty and meaningless that it's empty and meaningless ❤

    • @virtueorvice
      @virtueorvice 20 днів тому +2

      That's true. And that's why we need to be practical and create meaning for ourselves and probably others

  • @principlesoflife172
    @principlesoflife172 17 днів тому +2

    Even I am having same feeling. We are programmed...few monks knew that and trying to escape from it

  • @3ns0mh3t
    @3ns0mh3t День тому

    Purpose of life is transcendence. Liberation ontology. Schopenhauer was close but he was no Adi Shankara

  • @abulles2941
    @abulles2941 Місяць тому +5

    Thank you, Charles ! I'll remenber Schopenhauer on Valentine's day and I'll be a little more... philosophical about it :))

  • @shucksful
    @shucksful 19 днів тому +2

    I feel very much like Schopenhauer, lately. 😊

  • @schneiderrameau264
    @schneiderrameau264 25 днів тому +1

    Charles you are a blessing. With you, philosophy more amazing.

    • @backseateats9513
      @backseateats9513 24 дні тому

      I have a small penis 4 inches
      I thought it was a curse but
      It kept me from having sex and made me tough
      Men and women make fun of me

  • @fredy8904
    @fredy8904 Місяць тому +6

    This is a very interesting topic !!

  • @enneaf1676
    @enneaf1676 День тому +1

    Human love is hollow. You have to trust the object of your love in order to love it and after a lifetime of mind games and materialistic nonsense.....no thanks.

  • @kendrickjahn1261
    @kendrickjahn1261 8 днів тому

    Schopenhauer was a proto-naturalist, a precursor of Charles Darwin. He almost had it when he talked about animal survival.

  • @luisgama123
    @luisgama123 24 дні тому +1

    Great content, voice and intonation. Thanks. Subbed.

  • @mohammedomar1289
    @mohammedomar1289 26 днів тому +1

    I don't sub often to UA-cam channels, yours definitely left a good a imression!

  • @jonyfive9786
    @jonyfive9786 19 днів тому +1

    There is always opportunity to reach for a better feeling thought.
    All joy and suffering comes from within feelings and emotions are chemical reactions in the brain who should be responsible what goes on inside you 😮
    People are not disturbed by things but the
    views they take of them
    Imagine you never had a thought that was disturbing you would you be disturbed?
    It is attachment to your own thoughts that have now been clearly identified as conceptual fabrications that are the cause of your suffering.

  • @SLK-ep4fc
    @SLK-ep4fc Місяць тому +1

    Wondeing r how the will , spoken of here, reconciles with gurdjieff s ideas on the matter. Thank you for this great presentation 🎉

  • @fouzia.h3436
    @fouzia.h3436 28 днів тому +2

    Merci Charles Robin

  • @anodine_org
    @anodine_org Місяць тому +4

    Thank you very much. Very nice way to tell.

  • @johnroberts7980
    @johnroberts7980 26 днів тому +1

    Very interesting, I always think like this after growing traveling look at the vast amount of space etc thanks for sharing this

  • @evelynwhite2238
    @evelynwhite2238 15 днів тому +1

    Time is an illusion.

  • @ElianTruman
    @ElianTruman 13 днів тому

    THIS IS A GOOD SEGWAY FROM THE TOPIC OF EPHEMERAL PERCEPTION TO THE TOPIC OF PERSPECTIVE i.e... ETERNAL PERSPECTIVE. ONE THAT WILL SURELY BROADEN YOUR HORIZONS.

  • @bettyhaines2570
    @bettyhaines2570 26 днів тому +1

    Thank you 😊❤🙏💝

  • @danrk2536
    @danrk2536 8 днів тому

    New subscriber here too. Very interesting work!

  • @McD-j5r
    @McD-j5r 8 днів тому

    I can’t embark on two points of Schopenhauer: space and time. Obviously they do exist but humans are beyond it. Yes, humans can imagine things beyond it. But most of the people think like him.
    I don't identify with the beginning of life (proteins and evolution) either.
    Will to live and Will to Die - Freud.

  • @samlazar1053
    @samlazar1053 20 днів тому +1

    There is no free sex.
    Only a mad Person would come up with a concept free love

  • @SLK-ep4fc
    @SLK-ep4fc Місяць тому +2

    Great voice thank you. 🎉

  • @daathmann5814
    @daathmann5814 5 днів тому

    It's not dark or pessmistic. He is just sober.

  • @MoisesAlaniz-f7f
    @MoisesAlaniz-f7f 24 дні тому +1

    Thank you 😮

    • @backseateats9513
      @backseateats9513 24 дні тому

      I have a small penis 4 inches
      I thought it was a curse but
      It kept me from having sex and made me tough
      Men and women make fun of me

  • @RandolphOyiejoiOburu
    @RandolphOyiejoiOburu 10 днів тому

    Very interesting👌🏿

  • @Moises-fe8ww
    @Moises-fe8ww Місяць тому +2

    Bonjour Charles, celui-ci est mieux que l'anterieur cependant il y a encore quelque chose qui manque peut-être "the feeling", le effet que produit la compréhension et la sensibilité à cette compréhension et tres difficil à reproduire, maia bon ça commence à marcher!
    Excuses mon mauvais français, c'est l'espagnol ma langue matternelle

  • @BrianBadey
    @BrianBadey 8 днів тому

    But it feels so good!😅

  • @Foxie635
    @Foxie635 29 днів тому +1

    Correct, I agreed. No such things as free will!

  • @dad102
    @dad102 25 днів тому

    This is very good.

  • @h.sapiens3404
    @h.sapiens3404 25 днів тому

    Amazing 😮

  • @mihaip90
    @mihaip90 24 дні тому

    Interesting concept

  • @walterhudson4253
    @walterhudson4253 25 днів тому

    I'll have to became catatonic to grasp the deeper meanings of conjectural reality.

  • @andreiprodigy
    @andreiprodigy 24 дні тому

    Thanks

  • @JEDJDE
    @JEDJDE 23 дні тому +1

    A bit better A.I. voice than the previous video, still improvements to be done.

    • @Romanovic-c5d
      @Romanovic-c5d 18 днів тому +1

      That is not A.I actually.

    • @JEDJDE
      @JEDJDE 18 днів тому

      @Romanovic-c5d Is it your voice ?

  • @keithleeuwen877
    @keithleeuwen877 17 днів тому

    What a genius !

  • @ribleshark2242
    @ribleshark2242 Місяць тому +3

    sheeesshh je vais peut être me le reécouté cette lucidité qui ferrait flanché n'importe quel humain.

  • @tanjeetstephens5730
    @tanjeetstephens5730 21 день тому

    Love is not a trap... stupidity is.

  • @rorrschach8339
    @rorrschach8339 18 днів тому +1

    Sounds like Schopenhaur had absolutely no control over his life and was trying to intellectualize it.

    • @ChrisDragotta
      @ChrisDragotta День тому

      That’s what happens when women aren’t interested. Happens to almost all men now.

  • @LePhilosef-1er
    @LePhilosef-1er Місяць тому +4

    King Arthur

  • @paulsowards8345
    @paulsowards8345 3 дні тому

    Read the modern spiritual classic, “I Am That”.

    • @ChrisDragotta
      @ChrisDragotta День тому

      You are not. What is “that” referring to? New age bs. What is this supposed to mean? Anything you want? Nothing? Please. Demand more.

    • @paulsowards8345
      @paulsowards8345 День тому

      @@ChrisDragotta the incomprehensible, thus ineffable. We only know ourselves by negation. Tell me, who is Chris Dragotta?

  • @isatousarr7044
    @isatousarr7044 23 дні тому +2

    Schopenhauer's philosophy presents a deeply introspective and, at times, provocative exploration of metaphysics, love, and sex, viewing them as interconnected elements within the human condition. His metaphysical framework, rooted in the "Will" as the fundamental force of existence, permeates his understanding of love and sexual attraction, casting them not as mere emotional or romantic endeavors but as manifestations of the Will to life.
    Schopenhauer's metaphysics positions the Will as an irrational, blind force driving all beings toward survival and reproduction. From this perspective, love is not a purely spiritual or selfless experience but an instrument of the Will, ensuring the continuation of life. Romantic attraction, in his view, often arises unconsciously as individuals seek partners whose genetic qualities complement their own, striving to produce the "ideal" offspring. This interpretation reduces love to a biological mechanism, emphasizing its role in fulfilling nature's reproductive imperative.
    Sex, too, is framed within this metaphysical context. Schopenhauer regarded sexual desire as a potent expression of the Will's drive. While he acknowledged its creative potential, he also viewed it with skepticism, considering it a source of suffering and conflict. The pursuit of sexual gratification, according to Schopenhauer, often leads to disillusionment, as the individual's yearning for transcendence or fulfillment clashes with the limitations of physical reality.
    Interestingly, Schopenhauer's perspective on love and sex also reflects his broader pessimism about life. He saw existence as characterized by endless striving and inevitable dissatisfaction, with love and sexual desire serving as microcosms of this universal struggle. For Schopenhauer, true liberation lay in renouncing the Will through asceticism, art, or philosophical contemplation, transcending the cycle of desire and suffering.
    While Schopenhauer's views may seem reductive or even cynical, they offer profound insights into the human experience. By analyzing love and sex through the lens of metaphysics, he challenges us to consider their deeper implications and their role in shaping our lives. His work invites us to question the nature of desire, the interplay between individual longing and universal forces, and the ways in which we seek meaning and connection in an often tumultuous world.
    Schopenhauer’s philosophy serves as a compelling starting point for exploring the complexities of human relationships, reminding us that beneath the surface of our emotions and attractions lie profound metaphysical currents shaping our existence.

    • @stevensteven3417
      @stevensteven3417 19 днів тому

      OK but why, why wants the force do this, or why is there a force at all. To be honest love doesn't make any sense and the good feeling as a form of reward makes also no sense, unless somebody or something wants us to reproduce (animals and humans)

  • @raphI_I
    @raphI_I Місяць тому +1

    Oui

  • @lydiadoumon6781
    @lydiadoumon6781 Місяць тому +1

    After listening to this illustration I have more questions than answers…
    Why do we want sex even after children came and gone?
    Thank you

    • @ribleshark2242
      @ribleshark2242 Місяць тому

      probably because you can still able to reproduce even if you already did child , because the brain is dumb and don't count how many you make.

    • @erikdekker1
      @erikdekker1 Місяць тому +2

      Higher change to keep our bloodline/linage intact.

    • @unknownx7252
      @unknownx7252 28 днів тому

      It is said that some men can impregnate women into old age. The drive to procreate is strong.

    • @BenSohlberg
      @BenSohlberg 28 днів тому +4

      because nature always want more children to feed her system.

    • @live_well79
      @live_well79 26 днів тому +1

      The same reason our reptile brain wants to over eat, crave power or harm others. It's something we need to overcome in order to advance spiritually. Imo 🤷‍♂️

  • @KaieteurClax
    @KaieteurClax 27 днів тому

    It seems like ur saying " everythg is every thing. " 😊

  • @sveltenormal9023
    @sveltenormal9023 Місяць тому +1

    Great.

  • @ahmedbamba9525
    @ahmedbamba9525 Місяць тому +2

    Your English rocks ❤

    • @joeblow9891
      @joeblow9891 Місяць тому

      It's not Charles who speaks, but it's an English translation(made by a human) of his own texts.

    • @ahmedbamba9525
      @ahmedbamba9525 Місяць тому +1

      @joeblow9891 OK I see now the voice is just amazing

    • @ahmedbamba9525
      @ahmedbamba9525 Місяць тому

      @joeblow9891 Thanks for letting me know

  • @rosemarietolentino3218
    @rosemarietolentino3218 16 днів тому +1

    If he was better looking he would be saying different things.

    • @ChrisDragotta
      @ChrisDragotta День тому

      Yup. But he expresses what most of us have to go through.

  • @walterhudson4253
    @walterhudson4253 25 днів тому +1

    It seems rl me that he describes gravity and its effects along with how it affects physical matter as will. He seems to think gravity is the creative force that holds it all together whether 🌎 earth and moon or sun and planets or the spirals around the core or ⚫ black hole in the center of said galaxy. It seems to me will is gravity and that in turn GOD that holds the perceptual as one unit with many constitutional constituents we perceive as reality.

  • @FoxKalashnikov
    @FoxKalashnikov Місяць тому +2

    Well it's very interesting that his viewpoints and perceptions seem to be proven right in some of the most grotesque and insane ways today.

  • @channel123xyz
    @channel123xyz Місяць тому +1

    16:39

  • @AlexCMoro81
    @AlexCMoro81 16 днів тому

    true

  • @Pirodax
    @Pirodax 25 днів тому

    I wished to hear your voce M.Présepteur

  • @Libegfrat1
    @Libegfrat1 Місяць тому +2

    🍿🍿🍿

  • @jrp3384
    @jrp3384 Місяць тому

    He’s inspired by stoicism

    • @Arthur69Schopenhauer
      @Arthur69Schopenhauer 29 днів тому

      Barely. Any western philosopher is a little. He knew they were whiny and soft though. But he appreciated their way of happiness, through peace of mind.

  • @dhanushdhanu-bc5tf
    @dhanushdhanu-bc5tf 26 днів тому

    It's really simple understandable my friend ?

  • @Mel-os3ld
    @Mel-os3ld 21 день тому

    Many happily married couples I know would disagree with u 🙏

  • @Eans_urban_jungle
    @Eans_urban_jungle День тому

    I know this is ai
    However this is
    Is isnt *you*
    So its just my imagination

  • @viti2803
    @viti2803 Місяць тому

    It lacks something in the voice. A grain or something.

  • @dododoreen1
    @dododoreen1 28 днів тому

    100%

  • @LaskaraQueen
    @LaskaraQueen 22 дні тому

    This is Rudimentary and oversimplified Generalities of instant noodle Google Philosophy, this is not ~Metaphysics~