Using human operators is smart. How else can we get the training data we need? The only real problem I see is that the company will be subsidizing all the human operators. Whoever wins the robot market, however, will be sitting pretty. So It's probably worth the investment.
20,0000 for a robot that dances with you, is slow.Can a robot make a coffee. NO. Ix is a joke! Smoke and mirrors , wake up investors. Bullshit, show us a real video not some fake crap.
I really want to believe all this, but so far AI news seems to be just hype. Five robots in a factory is a free trial, not eager customers. Folks don't want hallucinating 6ft tall powerful robots in their houses. Safety is an incredibly hard problem to solve without reliability and predictability. LLMs work as emergent phenomena, and as such are inscrutable in terms of predicting outcomes. No one can reliably predict what an LLM will do.
Using human operators is smart. How else can we get the training data we need? The only real problem I see is that the company will be subsidizing all the human operators. Whoever wins the robot market, however, will be sitting pretty. So It's probably worth the investment.
betcha the dung beetle devs be shittin themselves over the quantum nav aplilcation test success, most exciting thing for nav since the sun
They should fight
@@MikeKalil in the desert under moonlight
Detroit become human 💀💀
20,0000 for a robot that dances with you, is slow.Can a robot make a coffee. NO. Ix is a joke! Smoke and mirrors , wake up investors. Bullshit, show us a real video not some fake crap.
I really want to believe all this, but so far AI news seems to be just hype. Five robots in a factory is a free trial, not eager customers. Folks don't want hallucinating 6ft tall powerful robots in their houses.
Safety is an incredibly hard problem to solve without reliability and predictability. LLMs work as emergent phenomena, and as such are inscrutable in terms of predicting outcomes.
No one can reliably predict what an LLM will do.