Best & Worst Heart Rate Monitors Review 2023: Find Your Fitness Tracker! 💪❤️ | Emma Mattison
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
- Welcome to your ultimate guide on heart rate monitors for 2023! 🎥✨ In this detailed review, I, Emma Mattison, delve into the best and worst of heart rate monitors, focusing on their accuracy in tracking heart rate, calorie burn, and heart rate variability. If you're seeking truthful, in-depth information on fitness trackers like Fitbit, Apple Watch, and more, this video is for you!
We'll explore the technology behind these gadgets, from PPG (photoplethysmography) to ECG/EKG (electrocardiogram) software, and discuss why wrist-based monitors might not be the top choice for your fitness journey. Discover why devices like the Polar, Garmin, and Power Labs might suit your needs better, especially if you're into functional fitness and health.
As a NASM-certified Personal Trainer, nutrition coach, and functional aging specialist, my mission is to provide mature adults with accurate, reliable fitness guidance. Don't compromise on your health goals; choose the right heart rate monitor today!
📌 Heart Rate Monitor Overview: 📌
💚PowrLabs Band: An affordable and reliable tracker for those seeking comprehensive data. Link: amzn.to/3FvxqAO
❤️ Polar H10 Band: Known for its accurate heart rate monitoring. Link: amzn.to/3FsXzjB
💛 Garmin HR Monitor Band: A solid choice for outdoor and sports enthusiasts and those who like Garmin products. Link: amzn.to/492RAjd
Review these options to determine which best suits your fitness journey.
🔗 Check out the recommended HRV App:
Elite HRV: elitehrv.com/app
To Further Commit to your Fitness Goals:
➡️ Access to FREE Cardio Heart Rate Zone Follow-Along eBook & Cardio Calculator (HRR Method): emmamattisonfi...
❤️ EKG Heart Rate Monitor: amzn.to/48axEKE
Ready to take control of your health journey? Schedule your 15-minute FREE consultation with me! Let's achieve those fitness goals together! 🌟
👉 15-minute free consultation: calendly.com/e...
👉 Emma’s Website: www.emmamattisonfitness.com
👉 Emma’s premade programs: emmamattisonfi...
If you enjoyed this review and found it helpful, please like, share, and subscribe for more content just like this! Also, if you decide to purchase through the links below, you'll be supporting my content at no extra cost to you (maybe even buy me a taco 🌮). Thank you, and here's to our health and fitness!
www.BuyMeACoff.... Thank you for the love! ❤️
*Disclaimer: Always get the approval of a doctor or licensed medical professional before embarking on an exercise and/or nutrition program.
*Disclosure: I only recommend products I would use myself and all opinions expressed here are our own. This post may contain affiliate links that at no additional cost to you, I may earn a small commission. Read full privacy policy here: www.emmamattis...
#HeartRateMonitor #FitnessTracker #EmmaMattison #fitnessproducts
Thank you all for watching! Please see this comment for helpful links and resources:
📌 Heart Rate Monitor Overview: 📌
💚PowrLabs Band: An affordable and reliable tracker for those seeking comprehensive data. Link: amzn.to/3FvxqAO
❤ Polar H10 Band: Known for its accurate heart rate monitoring. Link: amzn.to/3FsXzjB
💛 Garmin HR Monitor Band: A solid choice for outdoor and sports enthusiasts and those who like Garmin products. Link: amzn.to/492RAjd
Review these options to determine which best suits your fitness journey.
🔗 Check out the recommended HRV App:
Elite HRV: elitehrv.com/app
To Further Commit to your Fitness Goals:
➡ Access to FREE Cardio Heart Rate Zone Follow-Along eBook & Cardio Calculator (HRR Method): emmamattisonfitness.ac-page.com/Free-Cardio-Gifts
❤ EKG Heart Rate Monitor: amzn.to/48axEKE
Ready to take control of your health journey? Schedule your 15-minute FREE consultation with me! Let's achieve those fitness goals together! 🌟
👉 15-minute free consultation: calendly.com/emmamattison/15-min-free-consultation
👉 Emma’s Website: www.emmamattisonfitness.com
👉 Emma’s premade programs: emmamattisonfitness.thinkific.com
One of the best pieces of advice is the fob comes off of the band to turn it off. Looking at amazon reviews, there are a lot of people that don't know that fact. Also knowing they are all basically the same internals was good to know as well.
Hi @ipstacks11 😊 Thank you so much for taking the time to share your thoughts! I'm thrilled to hear you found the information about the heart rate monitor's removable fob useful. It's indeed surprising how many people aren't aware of this feature, which can significantly extend the device's life by conserving power when not in use. Sharing insights like the similarities in internal components across brands aims to help everyone make more informed decisions. If there are any other aspects or products you're curious about, feel free to ask. Thank you for your support and viewership!
A very trurhful and instructive review. I wish you could do another one like this on *armband* heart rate monitors... Greetings and thank you
Hi Knut! Thank you so much for your support, and thank you for viewing! Thank you for the topic request 🤗 As more technology comes out, I'm happy to supply an in-depth analysis review on armband heart rate monitors. Thus far, I can share that armband heart rate monitors primarily utilize PPG technology and that because of the PPG usage, I will still rank them as inferior to ECK/EKG-based heart rate monitors. However, I can rank them superior to wrist-based PPG technology because of the reduced "movement artifacts" from being placed more securely on the upper arm instead of the highly mobile wrists. I hope this helps you decide which monitor would be right for you! Thank you again for the topic request, your viewership, and your support 🙌 Stay healthy, my friend!
Best video on the subject! 🙌
I came here because I have big issues with tracking the HR with fitbit. And it is quite uncomfortable to have anything on the wrist when training with kettlebells...
Will definitely try powrlabs, thanks for an advise!
Thank you for sharing this! You are not alone in having issues with the Fitbit (or wrist-based wearables) issues. I completely understand this challenge revolving around kettlebell training, too; major problem right there! You're so welcome for the advise 😊 I'll keep everyone on this video posted -- I have some exciting developments part of my graduate research paving the way to creating my own HR tracking app and more accurate wearable! Stay tuned for more, and once again, thank you for your support 😊 🙌
Thank you for this video it has helped me make an educational choice.
Glad it was helpful! Thank you for your support 😊
Thank you so much for this information!! This is so helpful!
You are so welcome!
Love you sense of humor. I'm brand new to running and don't have a lot of money. I decided that, one day, I'd like to run a marathon. I decided to start training with my heart rate in mind from the beginning but have had no idea what to get or there to start. I decided to go with your recommendation here after your video.
I do have a question though, without a smart watch or wrist-based fitness tracker is my only option to track my heart rate while running looking at my phone screen while running?
Hey there! First off, a big welcome to the running community, and thank you for the kind words about my sense of humor! 🏃♂️💨 It's awesome to hear you're setting your sights on a marathon and thinking about heart rate training from the get-go. You're on a great path!
Regarding your question about tracking heart rate without a smartwatch or wrist-based tracker: Yes, relying on a phone screen is one common method, but as you've pointed out, it's not the most convenient, especially mid-run. Some apps and accessories offer workarounds, like the Polar band, which can sync with devices like an Apple Watch. It's a bit of a roundabout solution but can bridge the gap for now.
I’m actually delving into this very issue as part of my graduate research and am in the early stages of developing a product aimed at making heart rate tracking more accessible and less cumbersome for runners like you - and also swimmers. This is a gap I've noticed in the fitness tech world, and I'm excited to be working on solutions.
Exciting news: I’ve recently qualified as a UA-cam Partner, which means I'll soon be offering membership perks! 🎉 Members will get exclusive insights into my product development journey, offer feedback, and even participate in the process. This could be a fantastic opportunity for you to stay at the forefront of fitness technology, especially as it pertains to running and heart rate monitoring.
So, stay tuned for the official launch of the membership tiers. It's going to be an exciting journey, and having direct input from engaged community members like you could really shape the future of fitness tech. Your involvement could make a real difference in creating products that meet our specific needs as runners.
In the meantime, keep up the fantastic work with your training; if you need any personalized guidance, I do offer that as well! Remember, every step is a step forward, and I'm here cheering you on all the way to your marathon finish line and beyond!
@@EmmaMattisonFitness Emma, how can I be a beta tester? I towed in college and in my 30s. Now 60 and did two Two ToughMudders and two half marathons in the last 18 months. Looking forward to hearing back from you. Blair
@@kblairmilliken6550 You would be an excellent beta tester! Please email me at contact@empower360.ai and I'll send you a survey and put you on the list 🙌 I appreciate your support!
I just bought a Waho chest strap after using Polar for years
Thanks for the review. I went ahead and bought one from Walmart since Amazon didn't carry them. Figured out that you need a good connection to the chest before the app can find it. It's actually pretty accurate
Hey! I'm glad I could help - I noticed you are correct, Amazon is currently out of stock for them. I'm glad you were able to find the band at Walmart! Thank you for your support 😊
With the polar H10 you can leave one of the contacts attached to keep it together and it will still turn off!
Excellent video. Very informative and well explained.
Glad you enjoyed it! I sincerely appreciate your support! It would be awesome to get your feedback on the apps out there if you had the time to complete this survey! -- ujm7qa8preb.typeform.com/to/pOuEP7m0 (I'll also give exclusive access to my app if you're interested in being a beta tester when it's ready! Just let me know 😊 ) Thank you for being a viewer and supporter of my channel 🤗
I've had a Fitbit Charge 6 for 6 months now and the HR measurement is getting consistently more inconsistent to the point where it's basically useless. I spent several hours online looking for the kind of info in this video. Very well presented, concise and informative. When I do pull the trigger on a chest strap I will definitely contribute to your taco fund! Thank you for this.
Does Polar also track steps?
Thanks
This might be a dumb question but do you need to have your phone with you to record heart data?
No question is dumb! This is a popular question. In the past, it seems that the Polar H10 could store internal data, but based on my research, the help pages for that feature appear no longer relevant - making me suspect it is no longer a feature. However, certain Garmin monitors have internal memory so you don't technically need your phone with you to record heart data (support.garmin.com/en-US/?faq=BatdMMuLrk703sVqdI5069#:~:text=Select%20heart%20rate%20monitor%20(HRM,range%20of%20the%20HRM%20strap.). These devices can store workout data internally and sync it to your phone later. However, without a connected device nearby, you won't get real-time feedback during your workout. For real-time monitoring, you'll need to have your phone or another compatible device connected via Bluetooth or ANT+ during your exercise.
Additionally, smartwatches like the Apple Watch can record heart data independently without a phone. They have built-in sensors to track your heart rate and other metrics, providing real-time feedback directly on the watch. Syncing with your phone later allows for more detailed analysis. HOWEVER - as you know, based on my review, the Apple Watch and other wrist monitor's accuracy is questionable.
I'm currently working to develop an app (coming in the next ~20 weeks!) to solve these concerns, so stay tuned! I'll be gathering a list of anyone interested in beta-testing. Thank you so much for your question, and for your support! 🙌 😊
I would like to have some ALRET you hurt rate is over the set limited like 190 so please chill... What is the best option for me? I know there is not single device on chest brace so i need to wear extra watch on hand, but what kind? Which one is chipset and most good for power labs?
Great question. As of now, I have not found anything that can alert you for your specific zones. I have not yet tested it, but I have heard the app X-fitness notifies when you've reached 90% of TMHR. In my opinion, that feature is pointless other than expressly for high-intensity training. Good news -- I'm working to create a monitor and app that can do what you request because you're not alone! Stay tuned and be sure to subscribe for updates on this 😊 Also, for your other questions, it can be helpful to pair the chest monitor with an Apple watch -- there is a round-about option to do so with the polar band (and possibly Garmin). I hope this helps!
Solid vid
Hey Emma, but apple watch (series-7) has EKG, what do u think about it?
Hey Martynas! I had not heard of that feature, and took a bit to research it before responding. Thank you so much for sharing that it exists.
After conducting some research, I found that the main purpose of the feature is more-so to identify abnormal heart beat rhythms, and does not track real-time HR during workout. The actual recording of the heart rate takes 30 seconds, after which you'll receive a classification. The results can indicate a sinus rhythm, suggesting a uniform heart pattern, atrial fibrillation for irregular patterns, or other conditions like low or high heart rate. It's worth noting that the ECG app is not intended for use by people under 22 years old and cannot detect heart attacks, blood clots, strokes, or other heart-related conditions such as high blood pressure or high cholesterol.
The information recorded can be viewed and shared with your doctor through the Health app, providing a valuable tool for discussing your heart health. However, it's important to remember that while this technology is impressive, it's not a substitute for professional medical advice, especially if you're experiencing symptoms or have concerns about your heart health.
So, while the ECG feature is not designed for real-time BPM tracking during workouts, it offers significant benefits for detecting potential heart rate abnormalities, helping users stay informed about their heart health. Always consult with a healthcare professional for a comprehensive understanding of your heart condition.
Thank you so much for sharing this info with me so I could further research it! Also, thank you for your viewership!
@@EmmaMattisonFitness thanks for clarification 😊😊
It’s my pleasure, Martynas!
@@EmmaMattisonFitness Also Garmin just came out with an EKG feature on their wrist monitor. I wanted to get a wrist monitor so I would not have to use up my cell phone battery, since I live and hike in areas with no cell connection and the phone lasts only a few hours out on the trail. But if these wrist monitors are not accurate then it's not worth it to me. Wish I had a good way to track heart info while I'm hiking because I often get sudden weird heartbeats in the middle of a hike (when I'm slowing down vs going fast). Even 3 different stick-on monitors from a cardiologist are not helping me know what is happening. I'm sticking with just taking my own pulse like I've been doing for 30 years. Kinda frustrating!
Just disconnect one side so it can stay with the strap. Then that eliminates current flow.
This is an excellent point, Charles, thank you! 🙏 😊
YOu are welcome @@EmmaMattisonFitness
Thank you for informing me about the battery. I was wondering why it was at 50% when I used it for only 3 months. 😅
It's my pleasure! Don't worry... it apparently is a very popular mistake! You're not alone 🙌 🤗 Thank you so much for watching and supporting the channel!
How about accurate step counters, know any?
That's an excellent question! I'll go through legitimate scientific research articles and make a video on this topic. Thank you for the question!
I'm disappointed that the wrist based ones are inaccurate.
I wanted to monitor my hr 24/7 and for that, a chest strap is less convenient.
Maybe for women, they'll soon incorporate on in a bras.
I would have liked to hear HOW much more accurate the chest straps are compared to wrist. Maybe it's negligible and it still tracks progeess dor hr recovery, etc
Thank you.
Hi @ybaggi! I entirely understand your disappointment. It's such a great idea, in theory, to have something you can always have on you that tracks everything you need for your health, including sleep habits. The problem is, just like a "general practitioner," the convenient catch-all devices lose when it comes to specialization. However, you're right on to think, "...but HOW inaccurate?" because, depending on your goals, it might not matter that much for you when it comes to accuracy! You, personally, may not be looking for a "specialist," but want the more comprehensive overview.
In that case, there is a lot of literature to browse when it comes to ecg versus optical (PPG), and even comparing the different PPG. Here is my summary: ECG is always more accurate regarding every stat you can track. However, upper-arm-based PPG are better than wrist-based. ECG will be much safer and more accurate when you are in a zone where you are really exerting yourself (high heart rate response.) One article comparing wrist-based to ECG chest monitors found a general discrepancy of about +/-15 bpm in subjects, however, this bpm discrepancy can vary greatly based on skin color, exertion level in exercise, and even how sweaty you get during exercise. Here's that article link: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29881626/
When it comes down to it, of course, you can still use wrist monitors or PPG rather, but I recommend opting for the upper arm PPG or even the inner ear (if you can find them to purchase!) over the wrist ones. If you must use the wrist-based, be cautious, knowing the possible errors with BPM and also the kcal burn if weight loss is a significant goal.
I hope this clarifies a bit, but I can say -- that ECG bra? I would buy that! Thank you so much for watching, and thank you for your insightful questions!
Great video.
QQ: What do you think of biometrrc scales (Renpho as an example)? They record body fat %, muscle mass., and so on.
Second question: Would you discourage to vivoaction 5 (does it work with light as well). I am a brown skinned person.
Great questions!
Q1: I have both Renpho and Withings. They both work! However, Renpho is a cheaper option. Neither is 100% accurate, but, similar to regular scales, as long as you know they are not 100% accurate and you are consistent with when and how you measure yourself, either are suitable for tracking trends. However, be consistent with which one you utilize to gather your data so you do not confuse yourself from data projected by one model to another. That's the short answer! I can definitely make a more in-depth video on BIA scales as well 😊
Q2: Vivoaction 5, according to my research, still uses PPG. Although some statements say it has high accuracy compared to ECG chest monitors, the same principle applies -- dark-skinned individuals should exercise caution when choosing to trust PPG devices 100%.
I am actually in the process of developing an app that will help inherently improve the accuracy of PPG monitor readings since they are such a widely utilized form of wearable. If you're interested in being a beta tester of the app, shoot me an email at contact@empower360.ai, and I'll put you on the list! Really excited about the project; it's in conjunction with my graduate research 😃
Thanks so much for watching and for your support!
@@EmmaMattisonFitness First, thank you for taking time answering.
Second, very interested in Beta testing, but my Garmin won't get here till 07/05. I'll out the email when I am equipped.
@@rfrancoi Hey! You're so welcome. Don't worry, I probably won't be ready to beta text the app for another few months, but it's good to get a list ready of all those interested! Thanks 😊🙌
how to know if my chest strap is ecg?
Hey there! Basically, anything that goes around your chest will be ecg, however, if you notice any light that is actually touching your skin (either green or red), odds are it utilizes PPG. I hope that helps! Otherwise, the operation manual will always state the technology, too, if you're in doubt.
Hi. Great video! This was exactly what I was looking for. I used your link to buy 2 (one for the wife - who also loves tacos), so you should have a whole taco coming from us!
Awesome! I appreciate you (and your wife's!) support 🤗 🙌 Thank you, and I graciously accept the whole taco 🌮 😃
Thanks for the informative video Emma.
Is it possible to wear a chest HR monitor like the Polar H10 for 24 hours to give me a approx. total day calorie burn?
Hi @Synpa-007 ! 😊 Thank you so much for your kind words and your question! Yes, it's entirely possible to wear devices like the Polar H10 chest HR monitor continuously for 24 hours to estimate your total daily calorie burn. I've recommended this approach to several clients for comprehensive monitoring. However, it's important to note that Polar considers their calorie calculation algorithm proprietary, meaning they don't disclose the specifics of how it works.
In my own research, prompted by observations that some clients' 24-hour readings seemed slightly elevated, I've been looking into the accuracy of these estimations. If you decide to go this route, please ensure that your profile settings on the device, especially your height and weight, are up to date for the most accurate readings. Remember, no tool can provide 100% accurate calorie burn figures, but they can offer valuable approximations.
Also, it's worth mentioning that the Polar system might calculate your total or "gross" calorie expenditure rather than the "net" calories burned. This distinction usually isn't a concern for 24-hour tracking, but it's good to keep in mind.
I hope this helps, and I'm here for any more questions you might have!
@@EmmaMattisonFitness Thank you for informative reply, much appreciated.
@@Snypa-007 It's my pleasure, as always!
What about heart monitors to monitor all day HR... so we see our low/high.?
Hey! Thank you for watching, and thank you for your question 😊 Basically, any monitor could be utilized for all-day HR monitoring, but accuracy depends on the factors I mentioned in the videos. Currently, the Apple Watch is used widely by my clients to collect HR and activity data across the day, as is Whoop and some other wristwatches from Garmin and Polar. However, as mentioned, accuracy is a factor that must be considered.
I am actually in the process of developing an app that will help inherently improve the accuracy of PPG monitor readings since they are such a widely utilized form of wearable. If you're interested in being a beta tester of the app, shoot me an email at contact@empower360.ai, and I'll put you on the list! Really excited about the project; it's in conjunction with my graduate research 😃
Thanks again for your question and viewership!
I bought a weighted vest for rucking. Can I wear the chest strap with it?
Yeah! I actually still wear my chest strap monitor while wearing my weighted vest. It should not be a problem, but just make sure it's tight enough (without being restrictive) before putting on the vest in case you end up getting some friction pushing your band down on your chest from the weighted vest.
Hey which one of these makes a noise or indicates when you’ve entered a higher zone or dropped into a lower zone? I’m
Hoping to find one where I don’t have to refer to my phone while exercising to know which zone I’m in.
Hey! Great question. To my knowledge, none of the bands have any actual sound or haptics (vibration) to help indicate a specific zone. However, the phone apps may make a noise. I know the Polar Beat app will scream at you and say, "You're burning fat!" very loudly or "You're training fitness" (only if you have the speech setting enabled). The Garmin app may also have this sort of feature, but I am not familiar enough with Garmin's platform. It is a much-needed feature, and I'll probably develop my own band and app to accommodate this need! As far as I know, the Apple watch (and more than likely also the Fitbit) will tell you when you need to move around more to get a movement goal, but that is based on step count rather than HR. Great question! I'll most likely be working to develop a better app with more recent calculations for part of my graduate work.
Hey thanks for the quick reply ! That’s great information. I’ve look everywhere and couldn’t find a definitive yes or no to their ability to do this or not. Is there an app you’d recommend that has alerts or at least vibrates to indicate the change in zones?
You're so welcome! You had a great question! At this point, my best recommendation is the Polar beat app, but nothing vibrates (yet) that I am aware of. However, I'll keep you in the loop when I create an app and product that does this! I find it imperative -- especially for swimmers.
Do you have to have your phone nearby during your workout for it to record?
I have the polar H10. You can start recording your workout on your phone and then move out of Bluetooth range and it will store data. Once it comes into Bluetooth range again the data is transferred to your phone
@@kipperdog7950 Thanks!
@kipperdog7950 answered this perfectly! Sorry for the late response, but yes, I've had the actual real-time HR graph look pretty spotty if the Bluetooth connection is not great, but the data does transfer.
Does Powrlabs monitor work with EliteHRV? It is not on the EliteHRV compatibility list.
Sadly, it appears not 😞 I'm currently working to develop an app (coming in the next ~20 weeks!) to solve this, so stay tuned! I'll be gathering a list of anyone interested in beta-testing. Thanks so much for watching, commenting, and your support! 🤗 💕
@@EmmaMattisonFitness EliteHRV told me that the device needs to send them the "RAW" data. Maybe you can pull some strings with Powrlab
@@persistentone3448 Thanks! I'll look into it as well; could be something useful for the app I'm creating for HRV! 😃
Can I use my Powerbeats pros with my iPhone simultaneously while using the polar H10?
Hi Erik! Yes, you should have no problem doing that. I constantly pair my AirPods with my phone as my Polar is connected. There also is a setting in the Polar Beat app where you can enable the connection of multiple BLE devices (for tracking other metrics such as cadence or power). Still, it won't be necessary to allow you to pair headphones! Thank you so much for watching and thank you for your question 😊
@@EmmaMattisonFitnessthank you!! The Powr Labs price is very appealing but some reviews are so so. Do you still love yours??
Great question! I'll be filming an update for 2024 (hopefully soon). The biggest issue I've recognized amongst my clients (and myself) with the chest strap monitors is the battery issues, which can cause connectivity annoyances and disturbances. As of now, that issue persists for all the chest monitors. Because of these issues, I am working to develop my own wearable soon, and eventually an app as well, so stay tuned for that! But I can say that PowrLabs has the same problems with connection disturbances that I find Polar has, so I still think it's worth the price!
@@EmmaMattisonFitness whaaaa, thanks Emma!!
Never 1 problem with my polar h10 chest strap
That's great! I just have clients experience some connection issues; I still recommend Polar 😊
I’ve read countless articles that the Fitbit inspire 3 is most accurate and tempted to get one
Hey Brandon! Thanks for the comment! Could you please share at least 3-5 peer-reviewed scientific journal articles (no blog article) with these findings indicating the Fitbit inspire 3 is the most accurate? That would be contradictory to the research I have found, so it would be good for me to read. Are you implying that the literature suggests that of the available Fitbit models, the Inspire 3 is the most accurate? Or rather that the Fitbit Inspire 3 is superior to EKG monitors such as the Polar H10? Please share research regardless, as it only adds to the knowledge base for my community! Thank you!
@@EmmaMattisonFitness well it’s not exactly within those parameters but here is what has me curious and ironically after I wrote this I found the Apple Watch SE 2 was for bang for the buck a better choice 😂😭. I watched 3 solid watch reviews and one is an actual data scientist who compared the aspire 3 with 48 other smart watches and fitness trackers. He wore a polar heart rate monitor while wearing the watches. I also read 6 other online blog reviews that pointed the aspire 3 to be most accurate for sleep and cycling heart rate. Peer ti peer stuff not a ton.
Hey Brandon! Thank you for your detailed reply. It's always beneficial to understand the process of one's information acquisition. I can say to take with a grain of salt the "case studies" performed by an individual on themselves or any one person (even if they are scientists!). If one were to wear a Polar H10 and an Apple watch (or Fitbit) simultaneously to see if the numbers were the same, they may be synchronous for that one individual, but not all others. For example, individuals with darker skin (more melanin) or with green-color tattoo ink on their skin beneath any green-light based PPG will have faulty readings from the PPG software. Furthermore, the variability of sweatiness (or lack thereof) of an individual's skin may cause differential readings between the EKG technology versus the PPG. Lastly, some technology has an "interference effect" where the technology will actually skew the readings of the other (which is why ANT is starting to become preferred over Bluetooth), so it makes it questionable to have a research study wear two devices if the study has not explicitly clarified the lack of an interference. It's tricky to navigate the reviews and literature out there and try to weed out what claims have valid, scientific support, versus claims that may lead one astray. I hope that helps in determining validity of claims! My favorite resource is PubMed (alongside the online library of my academic institution) because many articles on PubMed are free to the public (not all articles, however). In my opinion, all scientific research articles should be free to the public... Thank you so much for your comment and the stimulating discussion!
@@EmmaMattisonFitness yup and if you need relationship or dating advice I am you’re huckleberry 😂. The majority of my following is on tiktok and my podcast. Nice chatting ⭐️
And the chip set off those watch is not fast enought.
Another valid point! For a side-by-side comparison of Fitbit versus the Apple Watch, Apple's custom S-series chips outperformed Fitbit's.
I just want one to see if I have a heart issue
Hey, Taylor! I strongly recommend if you have any concerns of heart issues to see a medical professional. These sort of wearables are not designed to be medical grade, and even in the cases where a true EKG/ECG could be measured, the data needs to be accurately interpreted by a medical professional (i.e., identifying abnormal sinus rhythm)! I hope all is well with you and your heart ❤
@EmmaMattisonFitness yeah, although he's a great doctor, he listed to a lot, but I really would like to speed along the testing and figuring out stuff, make his job a lot easier
Bardzo śmieszne intro hehe
Dziękuję! Cieszę się, że ci się podobało 😊
I bought this lady half a taco!
Hey, thanks!! 🌮
You saved me from waiting my cash
Fantastic!!! 💵 😃 I love reading that!! 🙌
Recommends leaving some of the best trackers out there lol nope!!
Hey David! I definitely still recommend Polar and Garmin products; this video shares an alternative monitor, as well as my feedback from clients and other user experiences. Thanks for watching!
@@EmmaMattisonFitness I just went out and bought the Garmin Epix gen2 pro 51mm because everyone says "it's the very best" okay I get it, It is pretty to look at it tracks runs and walks and w/e else under the sun. The problem I have with all these watches is the fact none of them are right calorie tracking is light years off, heart rate is iffy at best unless you connect a chest strap to them and last the recovery metrics are super far off most go off sleep and other metrics, but Garmin's sleep Tracker has never gotten mine right yet not even close it will tell me something like you had long enough but not good enough to reduce stress or you didn't get enough restful sleep, so if this is off then all my other training tips are going to be off also and this isn't just Garmin but at the very least Apple gets is right at about 6 out of 10 times and it is close to how I am feeling where I don't know what Garmon is talking about, I am sorry lol late night rant I just came in off a 10 mile walk and my Garmin has rebooted again 3/4 of the way through do you know of a work around or a fix? Even though I am critical of these watches I still love them all....AWU g1 Garmin Forerunner 965 Apple watch series 8 Garmin Epix gen2 pro 51mm and polar h10 chest strap I probably look ridiculous walking down the road with a watch on each wrist and a chest strap.... just to walk lol. It's kind of what I am into now though!! oh the videos are great by the way!
@@davidbraswell1481 Thanks for sharing your detailed experience with your fitness watches. It sounds like you've really immersed yourself in exploring their capabilities!
You're right to point out the issues with calorie tracking and recovery metrics. These errors are often due to the apps themselves, which use proprietary calculations to estimate calorie burn. An additional complication is that many apps don’t clarify whether the calories displayed are "gross" or "net." This lack of transparency can certainly affect the accuracy and usefulness of the data provided.
To tackle these problems (and others), I’m actually in the process of developing my own fitness and metric tracking app. My goal is to offer a tool that provides accurate and reliable data, moving away from the quick, often misleading solutions currently available. It's a big undertaking, but I’m excited to keep you updated as it progresses!
Regarding the potential interference from wearing multiple devices at once: BLE devices can indeed experience significant interference when used together, which could exacerbate the inaccuracies. It might be beneficial to stick to one high-quality monitor at a time to minimize this issue.
I appreciate your enthusiasm and the love for your gadgets-it’s clear you have a passion for this! Keep an eye out for updates on the app, and thanks again for your great feedback and support.
@@EmmaMattisonFitness Awesome I can't wait and yes, I do really love my Gadgets!!!
Heart rate has no bearing on calorie burn. As you get fitter your heart rate will become lower yet despite a lower heart for the same intesity and power output you will be burning the same amount of calories despite a lower heart rate
Thank you for sharing your perspective! It's a common misconception that heart rate and calorie burn are not correlated, but let's delve into the science behind it to clarify. Research in exercise physiology shows that while heart rate is indeed an individual metric and can vary widely among people, it does serve as an indirect marker of metabolic activity for the majority.
As you correctly noted, a more conditioned athlete might have a lower heart rate at a given intensity compared to someone less fit. This phenomenon is due to improvements in the cardiovascular system's efficiency through training. However, the energy expenditure (or calorie burn) for an activity is more directly related to the intensity and duration of the exercise rather than heart rate alone.
Studies have found that heart rate can be a useful tool in estimating calorie burn when considered alongside other factors such as age, weight, and fitness level. The American College of Sports Medicine provides formulas that use heart rate to estimate energy expenditure, acknowledging its role in the process.
Moreover, the concept you mentioned about maintaining the same calorie burn with a lower heart rate at the same intensity over time highlights the principle of exercise economy. As one's fitness improves, their body becomes more efficient at producing work, which might lead to a perception of discrepancy between heart rate and calorie burn. However, this efficiency doesn't necessarily mean that the actual calorie expenditure at a given intensity changes significantly; it means the body is using energy sources more effectively.
In conclusion, while heart rate is just one of many tools to gauge exercise intensity and energy expenditure, it is not accurate to say it has "no bearing" on calorie burn. The relationship is complex and influenced by several factors, including individual fitness levels and exercise efficiency. It's crucial to consider the broader context of exercise physiology to understand these dynamics fully. I hope this helps clarify; it is indeed a complex topic. Thank you for your comment!
@EmmaMattisonFitness I have all the data from years of cycling using power meter which is far more accurate on calorie burn . Heart rate is only estimated calorie burn . My fitness level the now isn't that great at the moment as its not that great the heart rate is a lot higher than in peak fitness so here a 3 I hour sessions on the bike heart rate 148 power 208 calories 839 end of season last year heart rate 132 power 198 calories 829. Peak fitness last year heart rate 127 power 199 calories 856. Thus is all genuine data from myself the figure with the lowest heart rate burned the most calories. 1 watt is 1 watt regardless of heart rate. All the heart rate is showing how hard the body is internally working. To produce 1 watt still the same amount of calories to produce. If someone runs for 1 hour when not very fit they will have a high heart rate as they get fitter the blood stroke volume of the heart increases resulting in a lower heart rate. So now when they cover the same distance at the same weight they will still gave burned approximately the same amount of calories despite their heart rate being possibly 20 to 30 beats lower. Yes as heart rate increases you burn more calories but so does an increase in fitness level increase calorie burn .
@@wrightwoodwork Thank you for continuing the conversation and sharing your personal data to illustrate your point. It’s clear you’ve put a lot of thought and analysis into understanding your own fitness and energy expenditure, especially through cycling. You’re absolutely right in highlighting the importance of using a power meter for a more accurate measure of calorie burn during cycling activities. Power meters measure the actual work done, which is a direct indicator of energy expenditure, independent of the individual's heart rate variability.
To clarify, my video does not suggest that heart rate is the only, or even the most accurate, way to estimate calorie burn. Indeed, heart rate-based estimates of calorie burn are just that-estimates. They can be influenced by a myriad of factors including but not limited to fitness level, hydration status, temperature, and even the time of day. In the video, I briefly touch upon the advantage of using chest strap heart rate monitors, especially when paired with apps that calculate calorie burn. The reason for this recommendation stems from the generally higher accuracy of chest straps in capturing heart rate data compared to wrist-based monitors. This accuracy is crucial because the algorithms that estimate calorie burn rely heavily on precise heart rate measurements. Your observation that "1 watt is 1 watt regardless of heart rate" is spot on when discussing mechanical energy output and its direct relationship with calorie expenditure.
Heart rate, however, provides a useful estimation for many people who might not have access to advanced tools like power meters. It's especially relevant for activities where power meters are not applicable or available, such as running, swimming, or general fitness classes. The heart rate gives a ballpark figure of how hard the body is working, which, when combined with other personal data (like weight and age), can estimate calorie burn.
Your data beautifully illustrates how individual fitness levels can affect heart rate responses to exercise. As fitness improves, the heart becomes more efficient, thus pumping more blood per beat and often resulting in a lower heart rate for the same power output or speed, as you’ve noticed. This efficiency, however, doesn’t necessarily translate to a significantly higher or lower calorie burn for the reasons you’ve outlined-the work (or watts) produced is what primarily dictates energy expenditure.
Regarding the point about running and fitness levels affecting heart rate and calorie burn, you're correct in saying that as someone becomes fitter, their body becomes more efficient, leading to a lower heart rate at the same pace. However, the calorie burn for covering the same distance at the same speed would indeed be roughly the same, regardless of heart rate, because the primary determinant of energy expenditure in this scenario is the work done to cover the distance, not the heart rate.
It's crucial to recognize that different metrics (heart rate, power output, speed) serve different purposes and can be more or less useful depending on the context of the exercise and what equipment is available to the exerciser. The goal of my video was to share styles of recommended heart rate monitors for individuals choosing to use such wearables; while heart rate can be an indicator, it’s part of a bigger picture that includes many other factors.
Thank you for engaging in this detailed discussion. Sharing your experiences and data adds valuable depth to the conversation - highlighting the nuanced relationship between heart rate, fitness levels, and calorie expenditure. Thanks again!
Applewatch is trash 🗑. I cringe everytime i see people wearing them. They're inaccurate and ugly
Thank you 🙏 I always try to be accommodating when people have the Apple watch -- there are "tricks" one can do in hopes of making them more accurate than they are. Still, in general, it's a challenge for me to navigate when I have clients who fully trust their Apple watches and Fitbit. Wrist-based devices are just not as accurate!