Thank you so much for taking the time to research! We all appreciate the effort your team puts into creating this invaluable collection of content. Since I'm a data nerd, I used SoothSki to calculate the middle of the camber arc for a few skis and compare it to their recommended mount points. This gives me a relative idea of how far each manufacturer intends for the boot to be positioned behind the camber's peak height. Of course, it's just one factor in how a ski feels, but thought you might find it interesting. Clearly the Sender's middle mount point line is unusually close to the camber mid-point, not just for a directional ski, but even compared to twin tips. It was the only ski I found with a rec mount point in front of the camber. Ski and position of rec mount relative to mid-camber point in cm Kendo 88 177 8.55 back Kore 93 177 6.95 back Blaze 94 179 6.45 back QST 92 176 5.3 back Brahma 88 177 4.7 back Rustler 9 174 4.45 back Enforcer 94 179 4.35 back ARV 94 178 4.25 back Serpo 92 180 3.85 back Playmaker 91 3.65 back Optic 96 177 3.3 back Chronic 94 178 2.7 back Bent 90 175 0.8 back Revolt 90 180 0.6 back Sender 94 178 0.3 forward!
FWIW I called Rossignol and they said the three lines printed on the 178 Sender 94Ti are "Progressive" at -4.5 back from true center, "Traditional" at -6.5 back and "Directional" at -8.5 back. They also said the middle of those three lines is the default for all-mountain, and recommend up to +5 from there for jib/park, which could put it forward of their printed "Progressive" line. That doesn't make sense to me given its directional nature, but that's what they said. The further back line was also described as for powder/freeride. These measurements are all different than the -7.1 for 172 (-7.3 for 178) you mentioned. I'm not sure what to make of this information. Thank you always for your time!
So I did a bit of measuring. In the 172, the -7.1 was taken from soothski.com as their setback measurement. In the 178 that I just measured, the progressive line is -5, the recommended is -7, and the traditional is -9. I'm not sure who's using these skis in jib/park as the tail is very flat. I'd keep it at recommended for general purpose use.
Sender 94ti and the Sender Free 110. Perfect resort pairing. Can’t speak highly enough of the 94ti. There is nothing it doesn’t do well. Feels to me like the energy of a Brahma wood core but way more easy going if you want to cruise. Smooth, supple and composed when the snow is less than ideal. Very different ski to the 104ti, much more energetic and ready for fun.
Thanks for your feedback. I’m wondering how this would compare to the Nordica Wild Belle or Santa Ana? I’m also looking at the Ripstick. I’m an advanced skier who loves all types of terrain but had knee surgery and a bad concussion so I’m looking for stability as well as performance. Thanks!
The Sender 94 Ti is an interesting ski as it has a pretty flat tail. The Santa Ana (97, specifically) has more tip and tail rocker, so it's easier to release from turns than the Rossignol. I feel the Wild Belle is a bit more front side oriented and may not be as good as the wider skis in adverse conditions and terrain. Ripstick is the lightest and easiest of this group with excellent energy and great rebound. They're not as stable as the Santa Ana, but are quite easy to drive. I do think the Santa Ana is a good choice here, with the 92 as more of a quick turner while the 97 has more tail rocker for more of a freeride feel.
Pretty darn similar. The Rossignol, at slower speeds and in more choppy conditions, feels more composed and stable due to the metal laminate underfoot. At higher speeds, the carbon of the Ripstick starts to take hold, providing excellent energy throughout. While the Sender is a fun and capable ski, it's not quite as poppy or snappy.
Hello! Thanks for the review! I demoed those skis and the k2 mindbender 96C at Jay Peak. Both 172. I liked them both but felt like the 94ti fared better on the hard packed snow and slightly less chatter on higher speeds. However I'm wondering how they compare to the k2 MB 89ti? I heard that those are pretty good for east coast skiing as well. Kind of hesitating between those 3. I'm ~5'8 (172cm) and 175 lbs, usually mostly on piste, advanced intermediate skier, not too aggressive but trying to get there. I'm starting to get into park as well, but I'll def spend most of my time on groomers. Would any one of those 3 skis be best, or do you recommend something else? And is around 172 a good length?
The 89 will take what you felt in the 94 to the next level in terms of grip, edge control, and stability, but you will lose a bit of versatility. I do think that the 89 is still pretty darn good for eastern skiing, you may want more if it snows a lot, but that doesn't seem to be the majority of time spent. I'd say 172 is great!
Would you say the Blackops 98 compared to this, would offer a little more off-trail versatility, a tad more forgiveness, while not giving up much trail ability?
Would you say this ski is more for intermediate to advanced skiiers? Was thinking of getting it but am a newer skiied looking to upgrade from my demo setup. Hoping to ski 20+ days this year with trips out west.
I think it falls squarely in the advanced category, but with the ability to punch up or level down depending on your preference and level of aggression. Very versatile skis!
Hey SE, thanks for the informative review. How would you compare 2024 Rossignol Sender 94TI and 2024 VOLKL M6 MANTRA SKIS? I am 177cm tall and 75kg in weight, and I ski both on and off trials on the entire mountain at Whistler/Blackcomb. Looking to buy a new pair of all mountain skis, and I was recommended for a few skis: Rossignol Sender 94 Ti, Volkl M6 Mantra, Nordica Enforcer 94, Head Core 93, and Blizzard Rustler 10. Thanks in advanced for your recommendation.
The Mantra is very precise--more so than the others for sure. The Kore is almost as reactive, but it's not as powerful. The Sender is more accessible, as is the Kore. Enforcer is pretty heavy and demanding like the Mantra. The Rustler 10 is the most soft-snow oriented with the most rocker and widest width. If you're looking for a pure all-mountain Whistler ski, I think the Sender makes a lot of sense with the Kore right up there.
Hello SE! What do you think would be a better ski for an advanced east coast skier between the Sender 94 and the QST 92? I am around 70/30 on piste and like to make shorter, technical turns on skis that hold edge through east coast crud/ice usually staying on the sides of trails. I'm not one to usually bomb down the slopes, but I do occasionally like to let loose and once I'm warmed up I'll do some moguls/trees. I'm 5'11", 185 lbs, so would likely choose something in the 175-180cm range. Appreciate your thoughts, notes and videos!
While I'm impressed with the QST's ability to carve turns on the front side, it's still not quite there with the Sender's more directional shaping. The QST is more versatile, so that'd fit better with more of a 50/50 split. Since you're 70/30 and seem more technical, I'd lean to the Sender, but these are two great options in the high 170's in length.
Progressing West Coast Intermediate looking for advice. Currently on the Head V6 170length. I am starting to venture more off-piste and looking for a more all-mountain ski I can grow into that is also somewhat forgiving. Would the Sender be a good option or would it be too advanced?
I think if you're okay with the ski being on the advanced side of the spectrum, the Sender is a great choice, especially if you're looking to grow and progress. If you're stuck between size options, it's okay to go shorter.
hey - looking at these for my 1st set of skis... have been skiiing all my life and now its time to get a set of skis.. I am 175cm tall - the length choice is 164 or 178cm.. I think I would prefer the shorter.. What are your thoughts?
I've just skied on some hired 165cm Rossignol 94 Ti's and their performance was faultless. They did everything asked of them. I only got to ski them on piste though due to lack of new snow, so i've not tried them off piste. My go to all mountain ski would be a Kastle MX84, and these Rossignol's felt almost as good, and due to the extra width underfoot would likely outperform the Kastle's off piste. I'm a similar height to you and weigh 74kg and been skiing 39 years and am typically 70% piste / 30% off. If i were skiing more off piste i might lean towards the 178cm length, but on the basis of how well the 165cm served me on the piste i'd need convincing to go any longer. Value for money, the Rossignol's win hands down against the Kastle's, but i would like both!
Hi SE! Thanks for the video. Maybe my impression is wrong, but I have the impression that the manufacturers indication of the mid mount of the binding, is pretty in the front of the ski, especially if you compare it to other skis. Is this a correct impression, and what could be the reason for this ? Actually I am hesitating between the Sender TI, the Faction Dancer 2, the Black Crows Serpo and the Fischer Ranger. All mid-90's (most of the time I will be skiing on the groomers, with exits to off-piste) Thanks in advance for your reply.
Lots of factors go into the setting of the midsole mark, and the engineers pretty much get it right all the time. It all depends on the height of the camber, the middle of the sidecut, and how the ski is intended to perform. If you're on groomers most of the time, I like the Serpo a whole lot.
Serpo has more energy and kick while the Sender is quieter and more smooth especially in adverse conditions and terrain. On-trail, I'd rather ski the Serpo due to that grip and pop, but off trail and in softer snow, I really like the flotation and predictability of the Rossignol.
The Ranger 92 Ti was more of a stiff and complete carver than the Sender 94 is. Both feature metal underfoot, but the carbon nose of the Ranger made it hook into the snow very effectively. The Sender, as a result of the Air Tip and the wider dimensions, does float quite a bit better, but on groomers, the Ranger is a very enticing ski.
The Maverick prefers a bit of speed to access the higher end performance ceiling. The Sender has a bigger range. I feel that the Maverick works great for expert skiers as a jumping off point, while the Sender starts at the advanced range and can cater to both intermediates and experts on either end.
I have the Elan Ripstick 96, I was recommending them to my buddy, but he got the Sender 94 ti instead. I’m curious if you guys could compare those two. I love the ripstick for the energetic turn response and lightweight, snappy feel. Also very floaty for a 96, I wish I had them mounted an inch or two back for a true narrow pow ski. The Sender 94 sounds more stable/stiff and much less floaty. Probably easier to carve Senders on groomers, but how do they compare in fresh snow and tight trees? Both seem like great options, but the ripsticks give so much freedom in trees and bumps, I’m wondering if the senders can whip around like that. Edit : Just saw the ripstick comparison. I like that you also described the ripstick as snappy. Even though the Sender is stiffer, which is often considered more suited to aggressive expert skiing, it seems like the sender was a better choice for my intermediate friend since the ripsticks seem to require a finer touch to make them behave and access the energy transfer in carves.
You're pretty darn close on your feedback. The Sender 94 has a much flatter tail and a more directional shape overall, making it more comfortable on groomed trails and in carved turns. The Ripstick is lighter and more agile, but lacks the stability of the Sender 94.
I'm hesitating between these Sender 94 Ti and the Blizzard Rustler 9, I'm skiing 70/30 (piste/off), I'm 6ft and 185 lbs, looking for a all around ski to take "everywhere" ! Which one would be best ? Thanks in advance !
The main difference here is the amount of playfulness you're getting. The Sender has less. It's got a flatter tail and a more directional nature to it so it likes to carve clean turns and rip down groomers and through crud with ease. The Rustler is more playful and better suited for softer snow, tighter spots, and with a more creative character. The more time you are spending on trail, the more you should lean to the Sender.
The Sender is a bit narrower and less floaty, but more direct and sturdy. The metal underfoot makes a big difference with the 94, and the flatter tail cuts through crud and chop with ease. For pure powder, dry snow, trees, and quick turns, the Sin 7 was tough to beat, but for groomers, cruising, and more aggressive skiing, the new Sender 94 is where it's at.
@@SkiEssentials Thanks for that synopsis. I have 4 sets of skis but for resort onpiste and some offpiste, I keep going back to my Sin 7 skis which are my favorites. So for new skis it's coming down to a toss up between the Sender 94Ti or BlackOps98 (which I did demo for 30 min).
@@jameshall9053 I ended up finding a used pair of Sender 94Ti's in Nov 2024. I've had about 13 days on them so far. They are good when I am aggressively carving on groomers and did well on some unintended mogul runs. But I still like my Sin 7's better when I'm a bit more slack on my technique (near the end of the day when I'm tired and not driving the skis but more surfy or sloppy) the 94Ti's almost want to catch or hook whereas the Sin 7s are playful. I plan to demo some BlackOps 98 to compare and see as I demo'd them once and found they felt like my Sin 7 skis but I only had them for an hour.
Demoed these in Vail - along with the Atomic Maverick 88s and the Blizzard Rustler 9s. Liked the Senders but with turns they were very tough on the knees/joints after only a half-day. That's the first ski that's ever done that with me. One interesting thing is that they take off like rockets out of nowhere. Learned later this could be when your weight is more in the backseat. I think overall it was a bit too much ski for me. The Maverick 88s were much more my style and more fun. Only drawback with those - they will throw you off over bumps or if your weight gets too far in the back.
The Maverick is stiff in the tail for sure. Perhaps you got a Sender with a bad tune? Sometimes that happens and does lead to a hooky feel, especially if tips or tails have not been de-tuned.
The Escaper 94 shared the same shape as the Sender 94, but the Sender has the Ti plate underfoot so it's a bit more burly than the older Escaper. But all Sender 94 Ti's are the same build and shape regardless of year.
Hi SE! thanks for all the super useful reviews :) Im hesitating between Sender 94 ti at 178 vs Stance 90 at 176... how these 2 compared? I like to ski aggressively and although I'm always looking for soft snow, I tend to be 60% on piste.. Looks like the Stance might be more stiff/powerful? thanks!
Overall they've got very similar feels with flatter tails and some metal in the build. Sender, being a bit wider and with a lighter build, will float better, but the Stance feels more planted on trail and in a carved turn. If you're on trail more often than not and put a premium on aggressive skiing, I do think the Stance has more to offer.
They share very similar shapes and profiles--you wont' find much more similar footprints of skis from different companies. The Sender has a more general appeal--easy to turn, fun to lean on, and incredibly versatile. Kore does the same thing, but it has a lot of carbon in it so it does feel and sound somewhat different. There's a bit more chatter to the Kore if you're not at a high edge angle on firm snow while the metal underfoot in the Sender keeps the ski more stable and smooth on firmer snow. Sender is also a bit floater--better tip shape and weight for staying above the snow.
Thank you so much for taking the time to research! We all appreciate the effort your team puts into creating this invaluable collection of content.
Since I'm a data nerd, I used SoothSki to calculate the middle of the camber arc for a few skis and compare it to their recommended mount points. This gives me a relative idea of how far each manufacturer intends for the boot to be positioned behind the camber's peak height. Of course, it's just one factor in how a ski feels, but thought you might find it interesting. Clearly the Sender's middle mount point line is unusually close to the camber mid-point, not just for a directional ski, but even compared to twin tips. It was the only ski I found with a rec mount point in front of the camber.
Ski and position of rec mount relative to mid-camber point in cm
Kendo 88 177 8.55 back
Kore 93 177 6.95 back
Blaze 94 179 6.45 back
QST 92 176 5.3 back
Brahma 88 177 4.7 back
Rustler 9 174 4.45 back
Enforcer 94 179 4.35 back
ARV 94 178 4.25 back
Serpo 92 180 3.85 back
Playmaker 91 3.65 back
Optic 96 177 3.3 back
Chronic 94 178 2.7 back
Bent 90 175 0.8 back
Revolt 90 180 0.6 back
Sender 94 178 0.3 forward!
FWIW I called Rossignol and they said the three lines printed on the 178 Sender 94Ti are "Progressive" at -4.5 back from true center, "Traditional" at -6.5 back and "Directional" at -8.5 back. They also said the middle of those three lines is the default for all-mountain, and recommend up to +5 from there for jib/park, which could put it forward of their printed "Progressive" line. That doesn't make sense to me given its directional nature, but that's what they said. The further back line was also described as for powder/freeride. These measurements are all different than the -7.1 for 172 (-7.3 for 178) you mentioned. I'm not sure what to make of this information. Thank you always for your time!
So I did a bit of measuring. In the 172, the -7.1 was taken from soothski.com as their setback measurement. In the 178 that I just measured, the progressive line is -5, the recommended is -7, and the traditional is -9. I'm not sure who's using these skis in jib/park as the tail is very flat. I'd keep it at recommended for general purpose use.
Sender 94ti and the Sender Free 110. Perfect resort pairing. Can’t speak highly enough of the 94ti. There is nothing it doesn’t do well. Feels to me like the energy of a Brahma wood core but way more easy going if you want to cruise. Smooth, supple and composed when the snow is less than ideal. Very different ski to the 104ti, much more energetic and ready for fun.
Our testers also found that to be true about the 94--very good grip and energy and very versatile!
Thanks for your feedback. I’m wondering how this would compare to the Nordica Wild Belle or Santa Ana? I’m also looking at the Ripstick. I’m an advanced skier who loves all types of terrain but had knee surgery and a bad concussion so I’m looking for stability as well as performance. Thanks!
Ps I’m 5’6” and 120-125 lbs - female :)
The Sender 94 Ti is an interesting ski as it has a pretty flat tail. The Santa Ana (97, specifically) has more tip and tail rocker, so it's easier to release from turns than the Rossignol. I feel the Wild Belle is a bit more front side oriented and may not be as good as the wider skis in adverse conditions and terrain. Ripstick is the lightest and easiest of this group with excellent energy and great rebound. They're not as stable as the Santa Ana, but are quite easy to drive. I do think the Santa Ana is a good choice here, with the 92 as more of a quick turner while the 97 has more tail rocker for more of a freeride feel.
How would you compare them to the Elan Ripstick 96?
Pretty darn similar. The Rossignol, at slower speeds and in more choppy conditions, feels more composed and stable due to the metal laminate underfoot. At higher speeds, the carbon of the Ripstick starts to take hold, providing excellent energy throughout. While the Sender is a fun and capable ski, it's not quite as poppy or snappy.
Hello!
Thanks for the review! I demoed those skis and the k2 mindbender 96C at Jay Peak. Both 172. I liked them both but felt like the 94ti fared better on the hard packed snow and slightly less chatter on higher speeds. However I'm wondering how they compare to the k2 MB 89ti? I heard that those are pretty good for east coast skiing as well. Kind of hesitating between those 3.
I'm ~5'8 (172cm) and 175 lbs, usually mostly on piste, advanced intermediate skier, not too aggressive but trying to get there. I'm starting to get into park as well, but I'll def spend most of my time on groomers. Would any one of those 3 skis be best, or do you recommend something else? And is around 172 a good length?
The 89 will take what you felt in the 94 to the next level in terms of grip, edge control, and stability, but you will lose a bit of versatility. I do think that the 89 is still pretty darn good for eastern skiing, you may want more if it snows a lot, but that doesn't seem to be the majority of time spent. I'd say 172 is great!
Would you say the Blackops 98 compared to this, would offer a little more off-trail versatility, a tad more forgiveness, while not giving up much trail ability?
This is accurate.
@@SkiEssentials Thanks for the reply!
Would you say this ski is more for intermediate to advanced skiiers? Was thinking of getting it but am a newer skiied looking to upgrade from my demo setup. Hoping to ski 20+ days this year with trips out west.
I think it falls squarely in the advanced category, but with the ability to punch up or level down depending on your preference and level of aggression. Very versatile skis!
How far are each of the three mount point lines back from true center? Which line did you test them on?
In the 172, the recommended line is -7.1 from true center. That's the one we tested them on.
Hey SE, thanks for the informative review. How would you compare 2024 Rossignol Sender 94TI and 2024 VOLKL M6 MANTRA SKIS? I am 177cm tall and 75kg in weight, and I ski both on and off trials on the entire mountain at Whistler/Blackcomb. Looking to buy a new pair of all mountain skis, and I was recommended for a few skis: Rossignol Sender 94 Ti, Volkl M6 Mantra, Nordica Enforcer 94, Head Core 93, and Blizzard Rustler 10. Thanks in advanced for your recommendation.
The Mantra is very precise--more so than the others for sure. The Kore is almost as reactive, but it's not as powerful. The Sender is more accessible, as is the Kore. Enforcer is pretty heavy and demanding like the Mantra. The Rustler 10 is the most soft-snow oriented with the most rocker and widest width. If you're looking for a pure all-mountain Whistler ski, I think the Sender makes a lot of sense with the Kore right up there.
Hello SE! What do you think would be a better ski for an advanced east coast skier between the Sender 94 and the QST 92? I am around 70/30 on piste and like to make shorter, technical turns on skis that hold edge through east coast crud/ice usually staying on the sides of trails. I'm not one to usually bomb down the slopes, but I do occasionally like to let loose and once I'm warmed up I'll do some moguls/trees. I'm 5'11", 185 lbs, so would likely choose something in the 175-180cm range. Appreciate your thoughts, notes and videos!
While I'm impressed with the QST's ability to carve turns on the front side, it's still not quite there with the Sender's more directional shaping. The QST is more versatile, so that'd fit better with more of a 50/50 split. Since you're 70/30 and seem more technical, I'd lean to the Sender, but these are two great options in the high 170's in length.
How about sender versus Declivity 92 ti ?
Progressing West Coast Intermediate looking for advice. Currently on the Head V6 170length. I am starting to venture more off-piste and looking for a more all-mountain ski I can grow into that is also somewhat forgiving. Would the Sender be a good option or would it be too advanced?
I think if you're okay with the ski being on the advanced side of the spectrum, the Sender is a great choice, especially if you're looking to grow and progress. If you're stuck between size options, it's okay to go shorter.
Would the Elan Ripstick 96 or Blizzard Rustler 9 be a better option for my level and also allow room to grow? I'm 6ft and 170lbs.@@SkiEssentials
hey - looking at these for my 1st set of skis... have been skiiing all my life and now its time to get a set of skis.. I am 175cm tall - the length choice is 164 or 178cm.. I think I would prefer the shorter.. What are your thoughts?
I've just skied on some hired 165cm Rossignol 94 Ti's and their performance was faultless. They did everything asked of them. I only got to ski them on piste though due to lack of new snow, so i've not tried them off piste. My go to all mountain ski would be a Kastle MX84, and these Rossignol's felt almost as good, and due to the extra width underfoot would likely outperform the Kastle's off piste.
I'm a similar height to you and weigh 74kg and been skiing 39 years and am typically 70% piste / 30% off. If i were skiing more off piste i might lean towards the 178cm length, but on the basis of how well the 165cm served me on the piste i'd need convincing to go any longer.
Value for money, the Rossignol's win hands down against the Kastle's, but i would like both!
thanks Tony, great to hear - I am toying between these and the Nordica Enforcers now... Fun decision to make 🙂@@tonyr7393
I don't think you need to go over head high on these skis--the 164 is likely the way to go.
There is a 172…
Hi SE! Thanks for the video. Maybe my impression is wrong, but I have the impression that the manufacturers indication of the mid mount of the binding, is pretty in the front of the ski, especially if you compare it to other skis. Is this a correct impression, and what could be the reason for this ?
Actually I am hesitating between the Sender TI, the Faction Dancer 2, the Black Crows Serpo and the Fischer Ranger.
All mid-90's (most of the time I will be skiing on the groomers, with exits to off-piste)
Thanks in advance for your reply.
Lots of factors go into the setting of the midsole mark, and the engineers pretty much get it right all the time. It all depends on the height of the camber, the middle of the sidecut, and how the ski is intended to perform. If you're on groomers most of the time, I like the Serpo a whole lot.
how would this compare to the Black Crows Serpo, Advanced skier 5'11" 210 lbs, mostly east coast and 3-4 trips out west
Serpo has more energy and kick while the Sender is quieter and more smooth especially in adverse conditions and terrain. On-trail, I'd rather ski the Serpo due to that grip and pop, but off trail and in softer snow, I really like the flotation and predictability of the Rossignol.
Hi!, how would you compare the sender 94ti to the ranger 92?. I'm skiing 70/30 (piste/off)thanks
The Ranger 92 Ti was more of a stiff and complete carver than the Sender 94 is. Both feature metal underfoot, but the carbon nose of the Ranger made it hook into the snow very effectively. The Sender, as a result of the Air Tip and the wider dimensions, does float quite a bit better, but on groomers, the Ranger is a very enticing ski.
Hi, is anyone able to comment on how these compare to Maverick 95? On paper they seem to have a very similar set of attributes.
The Maverick prefers a bit of speed to access the higher end performance ceiling. The Sender has a bigger range. I feel that the Maverick works great for expert skiers as a jumping off point, while the Sender starts at the advanced range and can cater to both intermediates and experts on either end.
I have the Elan Ripstick 96, I was recommending them to my buddy, but he got the Sender 94 ti instead. I’m curious if you guys could compare those two. I love the ripstick for the energetic turn response and lightweight, snappy feel. Also very floaty for a 96, I wish I had them mounted an inch or two back for a true narrow pow ski. The Sender 94 sounds more stable/stiff and much less floaty. Probably easier to carve Senders on groomers, but how do they compare in fresh snow and tight trees? Both seem like great options, but the ripsticks give so much freedom in trees and bumps, I’m wondering if the senders can whip around like that.
Edit : Just saw the ripstick comparison. I like that you also described the ripstick as snappy. Even though the Sender is stiffer, which is often considered more suited to aggressive expert skiing, it seems like the sender was a better choice for my intermediate friend since the ripsticks seem to require a finer touch to make them behave and access the energy transfer in carves.
You're pretty darn close on your feedback. The Sender 94 has a much flatter tail and a more directional shape overall, making it more comfortable on groomed trails and in carved turns. The Ripstick is lighter and more agile, but lacks the stability of the Sender 94.
Rossi Superior over elans
I'm hesitating between these Sender 94 Ti and the Blizzard Rustler 9, I'm skiing 70/30 (piste/off), I'm 6ft and 185 lbs, looking for a all around ski to take "everywhere" ! Which one would be best ? Thanks in advance !
The main difference here is the amount of playfulness you're getting. The Sender has less. It's got a flatter tail and a more directional nature to it so it likes to carve clean turns and rip down groomers and through crud with ease. The Rustler is more playful and better suited for softer snow, tighter spots, and with a more creative character. The more time you are spending on trail, the more you should lean to the Sender.
@@SkiEssentials Thanks a lot for your answer, you're the best guys !
How would you compare these with the old Rossignol Sin 7?
The Sender is a bit narrower and less floaty, but more direct and sturdy. The metal underfoot makes a big difference with the 94, and the flatter tail cuts through crud and chop with ease. For pure powder, dry snow, trees, and quick turns, the Sin 7 was tough to beat, but for groomers, cruising, and more aggressive skiing, the new Sender 94 is where it's at.
@@SkiEssentials Thanks for that synopsis. I have 4 sets of skis but for resort onpiste and some offpiste, I keep going back to my Sin 7 skis which are my favorites. So for new skis it's coming down to a toss up between the Sender 94Ti or BlackOps98 (which I did demo for 30 min).
I am also trying to find a replacement for my very worn sin 7 skis. What did you end up going with?
@@jameshall9053 I ended up finding a used pair of Sender 94Ti's in Nov 2024. I've had about 13 days on them so far. They are good when I am aggressively carving on groomers and did well on some unintended mogul runs. But I still like my Sin 7's better when I'm a bit more slack on my technique (near the end of the day when I'm tired and not driving the skis but more surfy or sloppy) the 94Ti's almost want to catch or hook whereas the Sin 7s are playful. I plan to demo some BlackOps 98 to compare and see as I demo'd them once and found they felt like my Sin 7 skis but I only had them for an hour.
Demoed these in Vail - along with the Atomic Maverick 88s and the Blizzard Rustler 9s. Liked the Senders but with turns they were very tough on the knees/joints after only a half-day. That's the first ski that's ever done that with me. One interesting thing is that they take off like rockets out of nowhere. Learned later this could be when your weight is more in the backseat. I think overall it was a bit too much ski for me. The Maverick 88s were much more my style and more fun. Only drawback with those - they will throw you off over bumps or if your weight gets too far in the back.
The Maverick is stiff in the tail for sure. Perhaps you got a Sender with a bad tune? Sometimes that happens and does lead to a hooky feel, especially if tips or tails have not been de-tuned.
So all versions(2022,23 etc) are all Almost the same
The Escaper 94 shared the same shape as the Sender 94, but the Sender has the Ti plate underfoot so it's a bit more burly than the older Escaper. But all Sender 94 Ti's are the same build and shape regardless of year.
@@SkiEssentials thank you so much
Hi SE! thanks for all the super useful reviews :) Im hesitating between Sender 94 ti at 178 vs Stance 90 at 176... how these 2 compared? I like to ski aggressively and although I'm always looking for soft snow, I tend to be 60% on piste.. Looks like the Stance might be more stiff/powerful? thanks!
Overall they've got very similar feels with flatter tails and some metal in the build. Sender, being a bit wider and with a lighter build, will float better, but the Stance feels more planted on trail and in a carved turn. If you're on trail more often than not and put a premium on aggressive skiing, I do think the Stance has more to offer.
You're the best guys, thanks! Went for that stance🎉 , but still watching your comparisons daily 😂❤
This Sender 94 Vs the Kore 93?
They share very similar shapes and profiles--you wont' find much more similar footprints of skis from different companies. The Sender has a more general appeal--easy to turn, fun to lean on, and incredibly versatile. Kore does the same thing, but it has a lot of carbon in it so it does feel and sound somewhat different. There's a bit more chatter to the Kore if you're not at a high edge angle on firm snow while the metal underfoot in the Sender keeps the ski more stable and smooth on firmer snow. Sender is also a bit floater--better tip shape and weight for staying above the snow.
First