I will never forget how disappointed I was when Tommy Lee Jones won the Oscar over Leonardo...that was an amazing performance of him...you just knew that there was more to come
I was pulling for Ralph Fiennes and still believe he deserved it - that was a career-making performance. But in fairness, Best Supporting Actor in 1993 was just a hot box of talent. What an impossible decision; it was probably the toughest category in the entire awards presentation that year.
Number 1 is absolutely spot on, though I do disagree about Bardem, because even though Casey gave a great performance as well, he's so clearly lead. Glad he's got an Oscar too now.
He was brilliant full stop. Ralph should have won. One of the most terrifying performances that I have ever seen in any movie set in World War 2 period. He had to physically and mentally turn into Amon Goerth for this movie and he absolutley nailed it. Perfect performance it's beyond me on why he didn't win the Oscar for this incredible performance. Are the Academy blind or something.
Joel Grey and Al Pacino both deserved the Oscar, so it was hard. Leonard di Caprio should have gotten best supporting actor. The rest were good choices.
I commented up above that Pacino should have been in the Best Actor category anyway. Brando, while his presence dominated the movie, would send a Native American in his place no matter what category he was in - so I leave him out.
Pacino's in Godfather was one of the all time great performances (even better than Brando's). Who can forget his eyes and body language in the restaurant scene? But there is no way it was as a Supporting Actor - he got FAR more screen time than Brando plus the whole plot turned around his character arc.
Agreed. Both Pacino & Grey were incredible, and I also agree that Pacino really should have been nominated for lead actor instead of Brando, and won it!😊
The supporting actor/actress category is often used to compensate veteran actors who’ve been bypassed over the years. It’s never a clearcut win for best quality. It happens in the best actor/actress categories too, to a lesser extent. I mean, Meryl has given some iconic performances, but Margaret Thatcher? C’mon, that wasn’t one of them.
I agree with a few of your choices but Al Pacino shouldn't have been nominated for Supporting actor. He's in the movie twice as much as Brando. 1972 should've gone to Burt Reynolds for Deliverance. Tommy Lee Jones Oscar should've gone to Ralph Fiennes in Schindler's List. 1975 should've been Robert Shaw in Jaws. 1976 should've been Laurence Olivier in Marathon Man.
Edward Norton was a newcomer that time i believe is the only reason he lost... Same with DiCaprio he was so young so i doubt they will give it to him that age... Case Affleck was really really good in Jesse James, he carried mostly the load of that movie but i think he lost because of tougher overall movie competition against No Country and There will be blood, but hey Javier winning it if you ask me he deserve it too... honestly Its a tough call between Javier and Casey.. Javier role could be one of the most scariest psychopatic role ever in hollywood same as Hannibal. Its just so sad that Edward never win while Casey and Leo already have one each.
Oh was that category a tough one that year! A strong case could be made for Leo DiCaprio too, and I loved Pete Postlewaite's work in "In the Name of the Father." Tommy Lee damn near stole "The Fugitive" from Harrison Ford and we all know he got the Oscar because he was overdue. But there was only one performance that made me sit in my seat when the film was done. Through my tears I told my friend that I needed to see the cast for "Schindler's List" because I wanted to know that name of the "guy who played the Nazi commandant, he is an incredible actor!" I went to see Liam Neeson and Ben Kingsley and came out marveling at Ralph Fiennes. He really should have won the Oscar. It was astounding work, both in realizing his character and in bouncing off of Neeson.
It does seem like a lot of these were given to older long time film actors for sentimental reasons, and not so much for merit. I agree especially that Brad Dourif should have won.
Michael Shannon should have won over Marshala Ali for Nocturnal Animals. I just never really was moved or at least affected by Ali's performance. Shannon took a character with about 35 mins acreen time and made him fully realized.
I agree with most of these including Tom Sizemore in Saving Private Ryan. That is his best performance ever! It makes no sense that he did not get any recognition for any awards let alone an Oscar.
Edward Norton performance was beyond amazing! Robert Duvall was incredible...BUT the ONE that deserved it more than any other?? Haley Joel Osment as the little boy that “sees dead people” in the Sixth Sense! SERIOUSLY, how do you miss THAT one!?
Pacino was in the wrong category, he had way more screen time than Best Actor winner Brando did who has very little dialog in the film and is rarely seen moving about except most notably in his last scene in the garden with his grandson.
your list nullified itself when you dissed bardem in no country for old men...the greatest villain performance alongside ledger's joker and hopkins' hannibal lecter...agree with cruise- easily his best performance of all time in magnolia...
Haley Joel Osment should have won over Michael Caine. This was an exceptional year tho. Any one of the nominees would have been a deserving winner. Was very impressed with Michael Caine's speech.tho. A class act all the way.
Al Pacino shouldn't have been nominated for Best Supporting Actor for The Godfather. He's in the movie for 2 1/2 hrs & Marlon Brando is in it for 30+ minutes. Both should've been nominated for Best Actor. Burt Reynolds in Deliverance won should've won
Joel Grey should be #1 on this list, with all due respect to him. I mean, it's Al Pacino in "The Godfather." We really shouldn't need to expand on that.
Well, what SHOULD have happened was put Pacino in the Best Actor category. He should have won. I personally would keep Joel Grey as a win in the Supporting Category - but I am nuts about both Cabaret and The Godfather.
Everyone deserved to win over Michael Caine that year (even Jude Law). Out of all of them, Tom Cruise was probably most deserving, though Michael Clarke Duncan is a very close second.
I agree Ed Norton should have won for Primal Fear and Leonardo DiCaprio for WEGG. I couldn't believe my ears when they read CGjr name for Jerry MaQuire
i disagree with the fact that matt damon wasn't nominated for best supporting actor for ford v ferrari. he should've been nominated over tom hanks in my opinion. if he was nominated for best supporting actor for the golden globes, why wasn't he nominated for the oscars? i really don't understand.
These lists are no good as they only look at the other nominees. Supporting Actor 1987 should have gone to Will Patton for No Way Out. However he wasnt even nominated and anyone who has seen that movie knows he should have at the very least been nominated.
Joel Grey's performance in Cabaret were mostly music numbers...he hardly acted. However instead of best supporting, Pachino should have won best actor while Brando, who's appearance on screen was minimal, shoulda got BSA
Disagree. Comedic and musical wins should be fewer and far between, but Grey's brilliant, incredible, and scarily sinister performance deserved every plaudit and award he garnered.
You do realize that he was singing and dancing as a character... which requires acting. That's the trick of it - to combine all three of those talents into one memorable character.
I agree with several of your changes; however there are 5 more that I think need to be there... 1955 Sal Mineo should have won for Rebel Without A Cause instead of Jack Lemmon for Mister Roberts. James Mason was outstanding in 1966 for his role in Georgy Girl instead of Walter Matteau for the Fortune Cookie. In 1982, John Lithgow gave a great performance in The World According to Garp and should have at least shared or beaten Louis Gossett Jr for an Officer and a Gentleman. 1992 I would have like to seen Jaye Davidson win for the Crying Game over Gene Hackman for Unforgiven. and the last one in 2005 is a no brainer, even though I think the world of George Clooney as an actor, human, and great person, what Jake Gyllenhaal did in Brokeback Mountain was better than Syriana.
Gotta say, nothing against Louis Gossett, but John Lithgow was terrific in "Garp." Maybe the question there was which actor not only defined their character well but who also best supported the lead performance? What do you think?
All of this is subjective some performances such as Joaquin Phoenix in the Master a fantastic performance in a shit movie was far better than his win in the Joker
Because Fosse's direction was seen as more innovative and daring. Don't worry - Coppola got his Directing Oscar a couple of years later. He already had a screenwriting one.
Coppola should have won over Fosse,bar none! Who remembers Cabaret after 51 years, I don't! Saw it once, seen The GODFATHER at least 20 times! Best movie 🎥 Ever!
In best actor they do this where the older guy wins over the younger guy for making up to ( pacino , denzel, leo ) in supporting mostly older actors for sentiment over the better actor. I wish they just got it right bc the making up to oscar screws the younger better guy & best supporting is just old hollywood body of work sentimental. Pacino , dicaprio are the most screwed actors ever. They should have at least 2 leads & 1 supporting ( even though al literally was the lead over brando in part 1 but its brando. ) the two im.shocked have no Oscar's male or female are ed norton & glenn close. Its sickening that jlaw, Paltrow & emma stone have lead Oscar's & glenn has zero. Julia Roberts is not oscar worthy either imo.
Well, it won Best Picture and best actress (and should have won best actor). The stage play only has the 3 main characters in it. All 3 are written beautifully.
Your assumption that the person responsible for this video is male and that only male viewers enjoy brutal warlike movies while women prefer quiet ones is really sexist....
@@josephkearny5874 Absolutely. Should have gotten honorary awards instead. And these sympathy awards are surprisingly discriminatory -- Burns and Ameche, but not Gloria Stuart!!
@@josephkearny5874 I know. But unlike Stuart and Kim Basinger who gave equally entertaining performances but no bravura tours-de-force, Bacall's performance was overrated.
@@GiovanniGGori I suppose but I liked Joe's performance in "Goodfellas" better. The Oscars don't like to give ties. It only happened once when Katharine Hepburn and Barbra Streisand won in 1968. If you want a tie, Gregory Peck and Peter O'Toole when they played in "To Kill a Mockingbird" and "Lawrence of Arabia". SPECTACULAR performances by both men!!!!!!
I agree with DiCaprio. I honestly think that was his best film.
IMO Michael Clarke Duncan should have won for The Green Mile instead of Michael Caine
I will never forget how disappointed I was when Tommy Lee Jones won the Oscar over Leonardo...that was an amazing performance of him...you just knew that there was more to come
I prefer Ralph Fiennes, but Leo gave a great performance too.
Stephanie Wiesmann Ralph Fiennes instead.
Pete Postlethwaite was amazing in In the name of the father too
It was a hell of a choice for the 1993 Oscars. That was a GREAT year for movie watching!!!!!!!
I was pulling for Ralph Fiennes and still believe he deserved it - that was a career-making performance. But in fairness, Best Supporting Actor in 1993 was just a hot box of talent. What an impossible decision; it was probably the toughest category in the entire awards presentation that year.
Your right on with your number 1, Edward Norton's performance was by far the more difficult role/character to play, and he did it to perfection.
Jake Gyllenhaal for Brokeback
Number 1 is absolutely spot on, though I do disagree about Bardem, because even though Casey gave a great performance as well, he's so clearly lead. Glad he's got an Oscar too now.
That was supposed to be Leo's first Oscar win.
Apparently it wasn't.
Ed Norton primal fear for sure.
I agree with a lot of these, especially the fact that Leo got robbed! He was amazing as Arnie Grape!
The Top 8 Oscar Mistakes between 1985 and 2007
In 1993 the best supporting actor Oscar clearly should have gone to Ralph feinnes absolutely without a doubt
Yes absolutely!
My man Ralph was robbed. No one seeing SL ever forgets that performance.
I agree he was scary amazing! I would of given it a time with him and leonardo though.
He was brilliant full stop. Ralph should have won. One of the most terrifying performances that I have ever seen in any movie set in World War 2 period. He had to physically and mentally turn into Amon Goerth for this movie and he absolutley nailed it. Perfect performance it's beyond me on why he didn't win the Oscar for this incredible performance. Are the Academy blind or something.
Couldn’t agree more
I'd say Ralph Fiennes over Tommy Lee Jones and Leonardo DiCaprio
Joel Grey and Al Pacino both deserved the Oscar, so it was hard. Leonard di Caprio should have gotten best supporting actor. The rest were good choices.
I commented up above that Pacino should have been in the Best Actor category anyway. Brando, while his presence dominated the movie, would send a Native American in his place no matter what category he was in - so I leave him out.
Pacino's in Godfather was one of the all time great performances (even better than Brando's). Who can forget his eyes and body language in the restaurant scene? But there is no way it was as a Supporting Actor - he got FAR more screen time than Brando plus the whole plot turned around his character arc.
Agreed. Both Pacino & Grey were incredible, and I also agree that Pacino really should have been nominated for lead actor instead of Brando, and won it!😊
#8, #5, and #4 are exactly right. #3 is a tossup. #9 is nuts. Anton Chigurh is one of the most mesmerizing characters ever.
most mesmerizing "one note" character...
Val Kilmer in Tombstone.
Thank you for the list! I hope this brings us all to re-watch some great performances! You had me at TomCruise, btw
I would've given the 1987 Oscar to R. Lee Ermey for Full Metal Jacket, but that's just me.
I dunno, I personally preferred Vincent D’Onfrio’s performance, but Ermey (RIP) was probably closer given he got the Golden Globe nomination.
Why he wasn't at least nominated Idk. That sounds like a major malfunction.
The supporting actor/actress category is often used to compensate veteran actors who’ve been bypassed over the years. It’s never a clearcut win for best quality. It happens in the best actor/actress categories too, to a lesser extent. I mean, Meryl has given some iconic performances, but Margaret Thatcher? C’mon, that wasn’t one of them.
Dave Glo Viola Davis should have won that year for The Help.
I didn't know they were competing against their own performances in previous years...
Christian Bale should have won for The Big Short, Thomas Haden Church for Sideways and William H. Macy for Fargo.
William H. Macy for "Fargo"! He was brilliant. 😊
I agree with a few of your choices but Al Pacino shouldn't have been nominated for Supporting actor. He's in the movie twice as much as Brando. 1972 should've gone to Burt Reynolds for Deliverance. Tommy Lee Jones Oscar should've gone to Ralph Fiennes in Schindler's List. 1975 should've been Robert Shaw in Jaws. 1976 should've been Laurence Olivier in Marathon Man.
"Tommy Lee Jones Oscar should've gone to Ralph Fiennes in Schindler's List" -- VERY TRUE.
The Oscars are only a popular award.
Edward Norton was a newcomer that time i believe is the only reason he lost... Same with DiCaprio he was so young so i doubt they will give it to him that age... Case Affleck was really really good in Jesse James, he carried mostly the load of that movie but i think he lost because of tougher overall movie competition against No Country and There will be blood, but hey Javier winning it if you ask me he deserve it too... honestly Its a tough call between Javier and Casey.. Javier role could be one of the most scariest psychopatic role ever in hollywood same as Hannibal. Its just so sad that Edward never win while Casey and Leo already have one each.
Yeah. Newcomers never win...
In 1993, Tommy Lee Jones shouldn't have won. It should've won either John Malkovich or Ralph Fiennes.
I couldn't agree more Ralph feinnes was absolutely astounding in Schindler's highway robbery
Oh was that category a tough one that year! A strong case could be made for Leo DiCaprio too, and I loved Pete Postlewaite's work in "In the Name of the Father." Tommy Lee damn near stole "The Fugitive" from Harrison Ford and we all know he got the Oscar because he was overdue.
But there was only one performance that made me sit in my seat when the film was done. Through my tears I told my friend that I needed to see the cast for "Schindler's List" because I wanted to know that name of the "guy who played the Nazi commandant, he is an incredible actor!" I went to see Liam Neeson and Ben Kingsley and came out marveling at Ralph Fiennes. He really should have won the Oscar. It was astounding work, both in realizing his character and in bouncing off of Neeson.
James Coburn shouldn’t have won in 1998, the man who should have won wasn’t even nominated and that was John Goodman for The Big Lebowski
The dude abides 👏
It does seem like a lot of these were given to older long time film actors for sentimental reasons, and not so much for merit. I agree especially that Brad Dourif should have won.
Brad Dourif was phenomenal in "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest".
in 1987 willem dafoe in platoon should have won instead of michael caine in hannah and her sisters
Michael Shannon should have won over Marshala Ali for Nocturnal Animals. I just never really was moved or at least affected by Ali's performance. Shannon took a character with about 35 mins acreen time and made him fully realized.
Others who should've won are 1941-Sydney Greenstreet-The Maltes Falcon, 1943-Claude Rains-Casablanca, 1944-Edward G. Robinson-Double Indemnity, 1947-Richard Widmark-Kiss Of Death, 1949-Orson Welles-The Third Man, 1951-Robert Walker-Strangers On A Train, 1954-Humphrey Bogart-The Caine Mutiny, 1955-Jack Palance-Shane 1961-Jackie Gleason-The Hustler, 1962-Robert Mitchum-Cape Fear, 1964-Sterling Hayden-Dr Strangelove, 1967-Telly Savallas-The Dirty Dozen, 1969-Jack Nicholson-Easy Rider, 1970-Chief Dan George-Little Big Man, 1971-Andy Robinson-Dirty Harry, 1973-Jason Miller-The Exorcist, 1974-John Huston-Chinatown, 1980-Bill Murray-Caddyshack, 1981-Sean Penn-Fast Times At Ridgemont High, 1986-Dennis Hopoer-Blue Velvet, 1989-Jack Nicholson-Batman, 1993-Ralph Fiennes-Schindlers List, 1994-Samuel L Jackson, 1997-Russell Crowe-LA Confidential 1998-Tom Sizemore-Saving Private Ryan, 1999-Haley Joel Osment-The Sixth Sense, 2002-Robin Williams-Insomnia, etc.
Yes! Love out to my man Claude Raines, who was so good in "Casablanca"! I also to this day think Ralph Fiennes should have won for "Schindler's List."
Absolutely agree that Charles Coburn over Claude Rains was the #1 all time mistake in the Supporting Actor catagory
I agree with most of these including Tom Sizemore in Saving Private Ryan. That is his best performance ever! It makes no sense that he did not get any recognition for any awards let alone an Oscar.
DiCaprio not winning out for Gilbert Grape is criminal.
notice how all the "should have won's" are all for more memorable performances then the ones that won
Excellent.
Edward Norton performance was beyond amazing! Robert Duvall was incredible...BUT the ONE that deserved it more than any other?? Haley Joel Osment as the little boy that “sees dead people” in the Sixth Sense! SERIOUSLY, how do you miss THAT one!?
Agree with all 10!
If Leo would've won his Supporting Actor Oscar, Eddie Redmayne would be a two-time back-to-back Academy Award winner.
agree 2 shouldn't have won- but I would have given it to Branduer- Out of Africa/85 and WH Macy in Fargo/96
According to Robert Downey Jr in Tropic Thunder, DiCaprio could not have won, you know, because he went full.
Off topic a bit but who is singing this song? Is it Bob or a cover?
It is Bob
So agree about Samuel L. Jackson!
I quit watching the Oscars when Howard E. Rollins didn't win.
5 Best actors that I admire the most
Daniel day Louis
Mickey rourke
Robert De Niro
Ted Levine
Jack Nicholson
Mickey here s my 5 in no particular order.
Robert De Niro
Al Pacino
Tom Hanks
Leonardo Di Caprio
Daniel Day Lewis
My top 5
Tom Hanks
Al Pacino
Robert DeNiro
Christian Bale
Leonardo DiCaprio
Okay... congratulations?
Love ❤️ Casey
Tom Cruise? Nope, Haley Joel O for "I see dead people ".
Absolutely!!
Nope, Michael Clarke Duncan for the Green Mile
Haley Joel Osmend for The sixth sense.
leo di caprio 😁whats eating gilbert grape 1994😎
Al Pacino was robbed, but Joel Grey was no slouch either.
Pacino was in the wrong category, he had way more screen time than Best Actor winner Brando did who has very little dialog in the film and is rarely seen moving about except most notably in his last scene in the garden with his grandson.
Joel Grey was sinisterly superb and well-deserved every award, plaudit, and honor he garnered.
Totally agree with #1.
Its real close between the two at 9 and 10, but no arguments here...nice.
Martin landau should have won for tucker the man and his dream
I agree Michael Caine should not have won for The Cider House Rules but it should have went to Haley Joel Osment for The Sixth Sense
your list nullified itself when you dissed bardem in no country for old men...the greatest villain performance alongside ledger's joker and hopkins' hannibal lecter...agree with cruise- easily his best performance of all time in magnolia...
AGREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED!
Saying a list is "nullified" because you disagree with a single entry on it is nothing but arrogance.
Haley Joel Osment should have won over Michael Caine. This was an exceptional year tho. Any one of the nominees would have been a deserving winner. Was very impressed with Michael Caine's speech.tho. A class act all the way.
Al Pacino shouldn't have been nominated for Best Supporting Actor for The Godfather. He's in the movie for 2 1/2 hrs & Marlon Brando is in it for 30+ minutes. Both should've been nominated for Best Actor. Burt Reynolds in Deliverance won should've won
No Ed Harris should not have won over James Coburn. But Billy Bob Thornton definitely should have.
Thank you for the number 1. So true. He should have won for american history x too.
Joel Grey should be #1 on this list, with all due respect to him. I mean, it's Al Pacino in "The Godfather." We really shouldn't need to expand on that.
Well, what SHOULD have happened was put Pacino in the Best Actor category. He should have won. I personally would keep Joel Grey as a win in the Supporting Category - but I am nuts about both Cabaret and The Godfather.
I'll expand: Grey gave a better performance, and naming the actor/movie isn't an argument for anything.
Pizzi's Honor? Prizzi's!!
DiCaprio DiCaprio DiCaprio!!! Robbed!!!!
Leo was robbed robbed robbed!!
Haley Joe Osment, over Michael Caine.
That's a tough one, I say tie Haley Joel Osment and Michael Duncan
Everyone deserved to win over Michael Caine that year (even Jude Law). Out of all of them, Tom Cruise was probably most deserving, though Michael Clarke Duncan is a very close second.
What! You didn't saw Magnolia? Cruise gave a masterfull performance, the best of his carrer
I agree Ed Norton should have won for Primal Fear and Leonardo DiCaprio for WEGG. I couldn't believe my ears when they read CGjr name for Jerry MaQuire
i disagree with the fact that matt damon wasn't nominated for best supporting actor for ford v ferrari. he should've been nominated over tom hanks in my opinion. if he was nominated for best supporting actor for the golden globes, why wasn't he nominated for the oscars? i really don't understand.
The Golden Globes are handed out by the Hollywood Foreign Press. They are not necessarily also members of the Academy who vote for the Oscars.
These lists are no good as they only look at the other nominees. Supporting Actor 1987 should have gone to Will Patton for No Way Out. However he wasnt even nominated and anyone who has seen that movie knows he should have at the very least been nominated.
I love that movie! You're right, Patton was very good in that.
Joel Grey's performance in Cabaret were mostly music numbers...he hardly acted. However instead of best supporting, Pachino should have won best actor while Brando, who's appearance on screen was minimal, shoulda got BSA
Disagree. Comedic and musical wins should be fewer and far between, but Grey's brilliant, incredible, and scarily sinister performance deserved every plaudit and award he garnered.
@@BrendanClifford Who are you addressing? Just wondering b/c I certainly do not "think doing 'musical numbers' doesn't require acting".
You do realize that he was singing and dancing as a character... which requires acting. That's the trick of it - to combine all three of those talents into one memorable character.
TIL nobody can act while singing...
I agree with several of your changes; however there are 5 more that I think need to be there... 1955 Sal Mineo should have won for Rebel Without A Cause instead of Jack Lemmon for Mister Roberts. James Mason was outstanding in 1966 for his role in Georgy Girl instead of Walter Matteau for the Fortune Cookie. In 1982, John Lithgow gave a great performance in The World According to Garp and should have at least shared or beaten Louis Gossett Jr for an Officer and a Gentleman. 1992 I would have like to seen Jaye Davidson win for the Crying Game over Gene Hackman for Unforgiven. and the last one in 2005 is a no brainer, even though I think the world of George Clooney as an actor, human, and great person, what Jake Gyllenhaal did in Brokeback Mountain was better than Syriana.
Gotta say, nothing against Louis Gossett, but John Lithgow was terrific in "Garp." Maybe the question there was which actor not only defined their character well but who also best supported the lead performance? What do you think?
All of this is subjective some performances such as Joaquin Phoenix in the Master a fantastic performance in a shit movie was far better than his win in the Joker
On another Cabaret note: Why Bob Fosse has an Oscar instead of Coppola having one more Idk.
Cabaret should’ve won best picture. Not godfather
@@alpe1987 definitely not.
Because Fosse's direction was seen as more innovative and daring. Don't worry - Coppola got his Directing Oscar a couple of years later. He already had a screenwriting one.
Coppola should have won over Fosse,bar none! Who remembers Cabaret after 51 years, I don't! Saw it once, seen The GODFATHER at least 20 times! Best movie 🎥 Ever!
Why is another directors count relevant to who should have won a specific year?
Number one is SPOT ON! I mean seriously that performance was unbelievable
In best actor they do this where the older guy wins over the younger guy for making up to ( pacino , denzel, leo ) in supporting mostly older actors for sentiment over the better actor. I wish they just got it right bc the making up to oscar screws the younger better guy & best supporting is just old hollywood body of work sentimental. Pacino , dicaprio are the most screwed actors ever. They should have at least 2 leads & 1 supporting ( even though al literally was the lead over brando in part 1 but its brando. ) the two im.shocked have no Oscar's male or female are ed norton & glenn close. Its sickening that jlaw, Paltrow & emma stone have lead Oscar's & glenn has zero. Julia Roberts is not oscar worthy either imo.
You are spot on 🤗
Samuel L. Jackson should have won for Django Unchained!
Are you kidding?!
It should have been DiCaprio. But even Waltz was better than Jackson.
Michael Caine over Dennis Hopper, Willem Dafoe and Tom Berenger
WOW! George Burns over Brad Dourif?!?! That’s insane! The academy played the “sentimental favorite” card obviously 😮
Number 1 is spot on
The 1990 Oscar should have gone to Dan Aykroyd for Driving Miss Daisy over Denzel Washington.
NO
Well, it won Best Picture and best actress (and should have won best actor). The stage play only has the 3 main characters in it. All 3 are written beautifully.
Absolutely NOT. That was one of Akroyd's better performances but no way it beats Denzel in "Glory."
The nice thing is that we can agree to disagree. lol
@@bigjonstxnone of that has anything to do with whether he should have won against the other nominees in his category.
Ditto Ed Norton for Primal Fear.
Ed Norton!
You almost always favor portrayals in very brutal, warlike films. And disqualify winners in quiet films. This is an offensive male perspective.
Your assumption that the person responsible for this video is male and that only male viewers enjoy brutal warlike movies while women prefer quiet ones is really sexist....
You determined the gender of the person making this video...how?
George Burns over the cuukoos nest actor???!!! What a joke!!
Burns and Ameche were sentimental favorites for sure
@@josephkearny5874 Absolutely. Should have gotten honorary awards instead. And these sympathy awards are surprisingly discriminatory -- Burns and Ameche, but not Gloria Stuart!!
@@robsieger1886 Nor, famously Lauren Bacall
@@josephkearny5874 I know. But unlike Stuart and Kim Basinger who gave equally entertaining performances but no bravura tours-de-force, Bacall's performance was overrated.
Timothy Hutton over Joe Pesci could be?
No, Timothy was well deserving of his Oscar. Joe was better in "Goodfellas" even though he played a prick!😃
@@triciajohansen7124 They gave a good performance, after all! Maybe a Tie in 1980 could have been a solution😌😀
@@GiovanniGGori I suppose but I liked Joe's performance in "Goodfellas" better. The Oscars don't like to give ties. It only happened once when Katharine Hepburn and Barbra Streisand won in 1968. If you want a tie, Gregory Peck and Peter O'Toole when they played in "To Kill a Mockingbird" and "Lawrence of Arabia". SPECTACULAR performances by both men!!!!!!
Joel Grey deserved his oscar