Fritz Kreisler plays Niccolo Paganini - F. Kreisler Violin Concerto No 1, Op. 6 recorded in 1936
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 лют 2025
- Niccolo Paganini - Fritz Kreisler Violin Concerto No. 1, Op. 6, recorded in 1936.
Fritz Kreisler, violin and Philadelphia Orchestra, conductor Eugene Ormandy.
If you enjoyed this video, please give a Like 👍, Share, Comment and Subscribe!
Other Fritz Kreisler recordings:
Fritz Kreisler plays his famous "Liebesfreud" or "Love's Joy"
• Fritz Kreisler plays h...
Fritz Kreisler plays famous "Liebesleid" or "Love's Sorrow"
• Fritz Kreisler plays h...
Fritz Kreisler plays "Caprice Viennois"
• Fritz Kreisler plays C...
Greatest Violinists Playlist:
• Greatest Violinists
Friedrich "Fritz" Kreisler (February 2, 1875 - January 29, 1962) was an Austrian-born American violinist and composer. One of the most noted violin masters of his day, and regarded as one of the greatest violinists of all time, he was known for his sweet tone and expressive phrasing. Like many great violinists of his generation, he produced a characteristic sound which was immediately recognizable as his own. Although it derived in many respects from the Franco-Belgian school, his style is nonetheless reminiscent of the gemütlich (cozy) lifestyle of pre-war Vienna.
#violin
#learntoplayviolin
![The Best Paganini Cadenza - Philippe Hirschhorn [Live, 1967]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LUKxJlsKkkc/mqdefault.jpg)
While I personally would favor the original over this more romantic version of that incredible concerto, there's no denying Kreisler's incredible skills! What technique, what sound!!! His playing is so lush, warm, and so richly textured (and you can hear that even without taking into account the old recording). It's just such a joy to behold😍
Italians: moving in for the kill blood drama feuds... Austrians: lets have a coffee and something sweet... 😂😂😂
Best Guarneri sound.
He used the best one among his own 21 good violins
I thought Mr. Kreisler always played violin with his unique soft warm and sweet tone, however what really shocked me is the first few notes he played in this concerto is almost like pulling out a sward by knight! Incredible performance!
I adore kries!er he brings the beauty and sentimental element of the violin never mind the interpretation he desires he is so human in his playing ,rip maestro you are the best to me !
❤
Kreisler made his own arrangement...it's sounds like Disney arrangement
I love Kreisler AND Paganini! This is my favorite rendition of Paganini's first concerto.
This piece sounds like a modernization of the original, in order to put the piece more easy for every one. (even personnaly I love the original version).
It was done in the 30's , how would have Kreisler recreated it today ???
I agree
Astonishing sound in the cadenza
Amazing !
I have loved the 6 paganini's concerto for more than 40 years, but I didn't know that Kreisler created this arrengement, more precisely this interesting reperforming.
And with Kreisler, we are in some "good hands" !
😮,… the vibrato the flautato the precision with the pristine softness!
Pure Gold
Nice...first time I heard this...amazing vibrato.
Много ми харесва!!!
Es la exelencia suena diferente. creo porque es el más antiguo ,es único su violín. 🌹🏆
15.20 cómo empieza esta bella improvisación muy adelantada a la época y cierra con un cambio tonal genial gracias Kreisler
Magnificent!
Pure genius! Eric Shumsky
And what a beautiful sound... something none has surpassed nowadays. And Kreisler was an old respected man in 1936... At the end of his career.
Es. tal la perccion. Sin palabras. ❣️❣️❣️🇮🇷México. 💕💕💕💕💕🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶
Esa no es la bandera de México 😅
This sounds like what happens when they turn a book into a movie.
Fritz Kreisler plays Niccolo Paganini - F. Kreisler Violin Concerto No 1, Op. 6 recorded in 1936
🙏🏼 THANK YOU
If Paganini were Viennese this would be the style. "I'll have a little Swiss cream und Zucker in meinem Kaffee, bitte, and let's become ein bisschen gemütlich."
It is very different from the versions that I have listened.
That's because Kreisler made his own arrangement of the concerto.
No really ??? 😂😂😂
No es versión ,es como debe de ser ,la técnica ningún otro la tiene. 🌹
Ye
🇮🇷💕🙏 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ Gracias.
Da la impresión que la orquestacion no fuera en la misma línea qué el violin, conocemos la melodia del violin y con ella nos guiamos, pero el acompañamiento como que pierde el touche de Paganini el que debiera ser un poco más agresivo.
Pues ese es el punto, y no no pierde la línea del violín, hay algo que se llama rearmonización y es algo MUY MUY común de hacer, si está bien hecha la rearmonización funciona muy bien como en este caso. Kreisler sólo quiso hacer este concierto en su propio lenguaje musical, y vaya que lo logró, sin perder la esencia del original paganini, una obra maestra.
The introduction could easily have been disney film music
😮 @5:15
Er hat gewiss ein außerordentliches Können, aber seit ich die Interpretation von P. Hirschhorn gehört habe, gefällt mir keine andere mehr🤔
🇮🇷 👋👋👋👋👋👋 👑 🙏🎶🎶
Забавная трактовка...насколько всё изменилось !!! Впечатление, что играет студент...оркестровка неузнаваемая. Можно представить, как исполнял это сам автор...так изменились вкусы и представления публики за более чем 100 лет...
I would say that modern players are absolutely unable to reach such beautiful sound and vibrato . That is a regression. And he doesn't play like a student. He is a great master.
Me las revueven las del telefon.
This is very interesting but the only thing I want to know is: why did he do this? Someone out there must know.
>> Why did he do this? Someone out there must know.
@violinhunter2
Presumably, the "he" of your question is Kreisler (not Ormandy).
But would you please be more specific -- what exactly do you mean by "do this"?
Yes, someone out there must know.
But first we need to be sure we know what you are asking.
Kreisler was a masterful composer besides being one of the world's greatest violinists. He did arrangements of several pieces like this for his own use. I doubt that Paganini would have been happy about Kreisler re-arranging his music, but you must admit it is a fascinating!
@@cletedavis5849 Well,... I know Kreisler wrote many salon pieces but he never wrote any industrial strength music - no symphonies, or tone poems, no operas, no piano sonatas or concertos or violin sonatas or concertos but he did write this thing. He must have spent many weeks reworking the harmonies and orchestration. Why didn't he just play (and record) the original? Why did he not "rework" Mendelssohn's or Beethoven's or Mozart's or Bach's or Brahms' stuff? I'm guessing that he must have proposed this "project" to someone before doing it and in the process had to explain or reveal his reason for doing it. Maybe he just did it because he could. In any case, I don't find it as much fascinating as humorous.
For a long time after Paganini dead, No one dared to play paganini music, and no one knew how to do it, then (and even today) paganini works are music that only paganini can understand, This ignoring the fact that paganini never published his violin concertos during is lifetime, in the lates 1920s Paganini caprices were very well know, But is violin concertos werent, I heard somewhere that kreiser did this to get paganini music fit more into the "popular" music standards, like a new way to introduce paganini to new audiences, if you look old recordings (1900s-1920s) you will find that paganini caprices were very popular (the caprice 13 for example), But his violin concerto 1 in the original key is impossible to find, ignoring yehudi menuhins recordings you will find people like Váša Příhoda having their own recordings of variations on paganini violin concerto 1 (sadly i only managed to find the first movement of it)-
Nunca había escuchado a Paganini solo 💕🇮🇷🙏🎶🎶🎶
Старая исполнительская ,,ШКОЛА" более достойна, благородная, жива, выразительная. Раньше преподаватель говорил ученику : ,,играй тут с выражением", а сегодня он говорит ученику : тут форте, а там ,,диминуэндо" -- и все в том же духе. Игра на скрипке претерпела безразличие к ,,постановке", даже бывает наоборот , прививают уродливые ,,постановки" в стиле ,,20 --го" века, далекого от классической естественной, пользующимися такими ,,СТОЛПАМИ", как ПАГАНИНИ, ХЕЙФЕЦ, КРЕЙСЛЕР, ВЕНЯВСКИЙ, ЭЛЬМАН и др., -- которые по качеству МУЗЫКАЛЬНОГО ИСПОЛНИТЕЛЬСТВА НА ГОЛОВУ ВЫШЕ, ЧЕМ СЕГОДНЯШНИЕ ,,СОЧИНИТЕЛИ ПОСТАНОВОК, УМНИКИ" То же касается и певцов, пианистов...
Редакция вмешивается в тексты комментарий, переворачивая ,,С НОГ НА ГОЛОВУ". В предыдущем комментарии сказано, что при. ,,СТАРОЙ" ,,КЛАССИЧЕСКОЙ" ШКОЛЕ ИГРЫ с точки зрения МУЗЫКИ исполнительство стояло НА ГОЛОВУ ВЫШЕ СОВРЕМЕННОЙ (20 --21 --х века). Этому есть объяснение. Не потому, что ,,ПЕРЕВЕЛИСЬ" ТАЛАНТЫ, -- а сама общественно политическая, культурная, ОБСТАНОВКА. НАДО ЧЕСТНО ПРИЗНАВАТЬ, А НЕ ,,РЕВНОСТНО". ОБЩЕСТВЕННО -- ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ СИТУАЦИЯ ИГРАЕТ НЕМАЛОВАЖНУЮ РОЛЬ. С появлением СССР, государства с программой всенародного образования, доступности культурных мировых достижений самому ,,простому" человеку, независимо от его происхождения. Культурные ценности государство стремилось дать всем, не глядя на материальное состояние, -- происходила ИСТИННО ДЕМОКРАТИЗАЦИЯ КУЛЬТУРЫ. ЭТО ЗАМЕТНО И В КОМПОЗИТОРСКОМ ТВОРЧЕСТВЕ : ПРЕЛОМЛЕНИЕ ,,ВКУСОВ" И В ЖИВОПИСИ И ТЕАТРАЛЬНОМ ИСКУССТВАХ, И МУЗЫКАЛЬНОМ : ПИКАССО, ПРОКОФЬЕВ, ШОСТАКОВИЧ, ПОЯВЛЕНИЕ КИНО. ФРИЦ КРЕЙСЛЕР, ПАГАНИНИ, ЯША ХЕЙФЕЦ, ЛИСТ, РАХМАНИНОВ, КАРУЗО, ШАЛЯПИН И Т.Д. -- ПОСЛЕДНИЕ. ,,ИЗ МОГИКАН". ПЕРВАЯ МИРОВАЯ ВОЙНА, РЕВОЛЮЦИОННЫЙ ПЕРЕВОРОТ В РОССИИ -- ПЕРЕВЕРНУЛИ СТРАНИЦУ И В ОТНОШЕНИИ КУЛЬТУРНЫХ ЦЕННОСТЕЙ. В ИСПОЛНИТЕЛЬСКОМ ИСКУССТВЕ СТРЕМЛЕНИЕ БЫЛО ОХВАТИТЬ БОЛЬШИЕ МАССЫ ,-- НЕ ДО ,,ТОНКОСТЕЙ" БЫЛО,. ,,ПРОСТОТА" В ИСПОЛНИТЕЛЬСКОЙ ,,ШКОЛЫ " ПОНИМАЛАСЬ ПРЕВРАТНО, ИСКАЖЕННО, -- НЕКОГДА БЫЛО заострять внимание на ,,мелочи", -- да и кадры преподавателей снижались по качеству, вплодь до ,,САМОДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ". ИСКУССТВО ШАЛЯПИНА ИЛИ РАХМАНИНОВА , ПАГАНИНИ НИКОГО НЕ ИНТЕРЕСОВАЛО, -- ВСЕ ОБЬЯСНЯЛОСЬ ,,ОСОБЫМ" ДАРОМ ,,СВЕРХУ", -- ЧТО НЕ ОБСУЖДАЛОСЬ... ОБЩАЯ КУЛЬТУРНАЯ ОБСТАНОВКА СНИЖАЛАСЬ , -- НА ПОВЕРХНОСТЬ ВЫХОДИЛИ УЧЕНЫЕ В РАЗНОЙ ОЬЛАСТИ , ДО ЯДЕРНОЙ ФИЗИКИ, ВОЕННОЙ ТЕХНИКИ, ОСВОЕНИЕ КОСМОСА. В ЭТИХ ЗАДАЧАХ , ПРОБЛЕМАХ. МЕСТО ДЛЯ КУЛЬТУРЫ ВСЕ БОЛЬШЕ ТОНУЛО ВНИЗ. ФАКТ НЕОСПОРИМЫЙ.
Since some time, they lost the courage to create beauty.
Interesting. While it is totally awesome to hear Kreisler's wonderful, unique sound, I have to say, I just hate this "arrangement"-- this downright corruption-- of this piece. It is dreadful. Just completely tacky. And unnecessary. The original is fine and doesn't need fixing.
I'd prefer listening to James Brown sing Mozart. What's the point of this?
Hilariously awful. Ranks with Greig’s two piano versions of the Mozart sonatas