@@seckinsahin For my usage 18-120 is perfectly fine for video but not still . I shot in A mode ,so ss can go very low and iso sometimes at 12800 and it looks fine to me. I only use it for my daughter performance where there is some light. However, the stabilization of body is not enough and I need post stabilization. Slow shutter speed is not good for that. The additional cropping makes framing harder too . So I switched to lumix s9 +70-300 because of that problem. I sold most of fuji gear but still keep 18-120 , hoping for the better stabilization in the newer body. I really like the weight, color and power zoom of 18-120 for video.
@@andr101 ohh thx, I'm one of those people now huh? Could still be both. Not willing to believe it's actually this stable after seeing all the shaky footage of other people with no zoom haha
Hi. Do you have any idea about the low light video shooting quality of the 18-120mm f4 lens?
@@seckinsahin For my usage 18-120 is perfectly fine for video but not still . I shot in A mode ,so ss can go very low and iso sometimes at 12800 and it looks fine to me. I only use it for my daughter performance where there is some light.
However, the stabilization of body is not enough and I need post stabilization. Slow shutter speed is not good for that. The additional cropping makes framing harder too . So I switched to lumix s9 +70-300 because of that problem.
I sold most of fuji gear but still keep 18-120 , hoping for the better stabilization in the newer body. I really like the weight, color and power zoom of 18-120 for video.
Thank you for uploading. I assume this is not handheld? Way to steady for this
the description says it's digitally stabilized in post
@@andr101 ohh thx, I'm one of those people now huh? Could still be both. Not willing to believe it's actually this stable after seeing all the shaky footage of other people with no zoom haha
It's handheld and post stabilized in Davinci. My hand wasn't so stable.