I ditched Leica For Fujifilm.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 бер 2024
- I'm switching from the Leica M10-R to the Fujifilm GFX 50R for my professional work - and the reason is simple; I want the better image.
The following are not affiliate links
Save 10% with 107OPLQS on purchase of Viltrox 27mm f1.2:
shorturl.at/pAIR1
Viltrox 13mm f1.4
Fuji X-mount: amzn.to/3QvqEBZ
Nikon Z mount: amzn.to/3q6Fm7w
Sony E-Mount: amzn.to/3rM0lgr
Want premium audio for your next video project like the ones used in this video? Grab a free one month trial here - trackclub.com/referral-landin...
If you wish to support the channel, you can use my PayPal here:
www.paypal.me/DRosa177
INSTAGRAM: / deerosaphoto
Brevite Camera Jumper Backpack - brevite.co/Dee
The Moment gear I use:
iPhone 15 Cases - partner.shopmoment.com/c/3417...
My Video Camera (Fujifilm XH2s) - partner.shopmoment.com/c/3417...
My lens (35mm) - partner.shopmoment.com/c/3417...
My Mic (Deity D4) - partner.shopmoment.com/c/3417...
My B-Roll Lens (Moment 18mm) - partner.shopmoment.com/c/3417...
My favorite bag at the moment - partner.shopmoment.com/c/3417... - Наука та технологія
Shoutout to all the Leica fans who got upset at this video; heal from your hurt and drop your portfolio.
I love the Leica system. It’s just not built to do what I need. Get over it.
I also had a 'sold Leica' video and some of the pro Leica arguments or counter points went through some 🏅 level logic contortions. But...Leica does inspire a strong response no matter which side of the fence one stands on.
It is funny how brand loyal we can become when realistically we pay to play. Lol I now just try and find equipment I enjoy using. Doesn't really matter who's name is on it. My name is on the photo. Lol
😂
Dude don’t let the comments get you riled up. Just use what you want. At the end of the day it doesn’t matter who uses what.
@@forgottenamericana these comments don’t get me worked up; I don’t let people talk shit without me responding because:
1. It drives up engagement when people argue or troll in my comments.
2. It drives up engagement lol.
Your videos take me back to reality that all these lavish and equally outlandish prices these camera brands demand is absurd and ideally put us back into the same spot. They all do the same things. Whatever you shoot (Fujifilm, Canon, Leica, Nikon, etc), will produce you up to good results that YOU can achieve. These expensive cameras don't make or break your photography skills, YOU do.
Thank you man you save me (for the most part) from GAS mentality.
nah I don't believe that at all. this sounds like a "gear doesn't matter" argument, but just 10 minutes ago I was messing with my 10 year old micro four thirds and compared results with my new full frame (A7cii). even with the same settings and focal length, the newer camera did much better with lowlight/backlight and colors. the FF also did better in depth of field, but that's a function of the lens more than camera.
@@1970rsc yeah you’re right. gear doesn’t matter. when you think about what the old time great photographers went through during their era, im sure they were less concerned about their gear and focused more about how to achieve the picture through their skills.
@@1970rscgear matters in super niche situations but most photographers that I've seen do not fit those situations. And those that do do not go for Leica lmao.
I switched from Leica to Fuji around 10 years ago. I had bought a brand new M9, a s/h 28mm, s/h 50mm and a new 90mm.
The idea was to slim down on equipment by using just one camera plus three primes.
Took the M9 out of the box and started shooting some test shots.
The images were soft using all three lenses, and with some more testing I discovered that the rangefinder was off.
Brought the camera back to the shop and after testing they confirmed it and the camera had to be sent back to Germany.
In the meantime the loaned me an M8 (they hadn't got another M9) and a filter.
Long story short 3 months later the M9 hadn't arrived back and I was still using the crop sensor M8.
The store offered me a full refund on the body and with part of that I bought a Fuji x-pro and some lenses which was way better than the M8 IMO.
I kept the Leica lenses to use on the Fuji via adapter but in tests I found the Fuji lenses to be just as sharp, so I got rid of them. I swopped the 28mm for a s/h Fuji x-T1 which I still have and which has performed flawlessly over those last 10 years.
Since then I've added the medium format Fuji 50r and some MF lenses.
Leica may have produced some classy film cameras down the years but I believe they lost that status when they moved to digital and compared to the likes of Fuji are way, way overpriced IMO.
Fuji made hasselblad lenses for their H system. They definitely aren’t lacking in creating great lenses
I still haven’t let go my GFX50SII because the color science is that DAMN GOOD!
love how you're brand agnostic and you choose the tools for the job. great video!
Much appreciated.
Really appreciate your honest views and how you keep it real. It really motivates me to get better at my skills than relying on gear. Thank you.
Glad you enjoyed.
Still on my Xpro-3, glad to see you’re back.
🥹
I did the opposite than what you did. I had the GFX100 and GFX100s and a bunch of GF glass.... I went to a M10R and later M11 and Leica glass. One thing that will hit you after a while is the bulkyness of the GFX system. The lenses are HUGE and heavier. The image quality is great, , but the kit is big. Good luck with your GFX system and use what you like. Great video!
I’m glad you’re love the trade off with the Leica system. It’s amazing.
The size and weight won’t bother me. It’s not that heavy lol. I was shooting with a 1DX and a Sigma 150-300 for a while. lol.
I’m glad you went on this journey and shared it with us, because your video where you were like, “I shoot sports with Leica because for a long time I kinda sucked at shooting Leica and I enjoyed the challenge” was such an eye opener for me. I have a lot of reverence for sports shooters and value your perspectives, because I shoot a lot of concerts and the demands are similar, but sports pay better than concerts, and it seems to me that photographers really have to pass a high threshold of results in imaging before sporting events will hire them. (With concerts, if you live in a small music market, you can shoot just by showing up with a camera). So seeing you, a professional sports photographer, admit that a camera demanded a lot of you and was a challenge to use made me feel 10000x better about the learning curve I always experience when trying new gear, a new video codec or workflow, or whatever. That vulnerability meant a lot to me and I’m glad you got what you needed out of the Leica system. It makes me feel like whenever I move into my next camera system and feel that “Am I good enough to deserve this piece of equipment?” self-doubt, I can know that professionals feel it too sometimes during a big change.
Totally nailed it. Feel the same way about Brand and Sensor "groupies". They spew lots of silly stuff on forums but they are last to post their own work.
Lmao this comment is valid
Ive been using the 100F for a yearish now, and for the 100F I exclusively use the AF bc I have the digital manual focusing. The lag for myself is just too annoying for me to use. I gave my partner my XT3 bc I cant fit it into my backpack for my walk to work and bought rhem a ttartisans lens bc they like to manual focus. My partners photos have real character. You can see the layers the are built from manual focusing and even if they miss a few focus, the ones they nailed are imo really amazing. Far more amazing than what AF can achieve. It really doesnt matter the pixels, the glass, or anything really. If you can think you can do it, you will do it. It takes time, effort and feeling lost sometimes but it doesnt have to be some $10000 camera with the biggest pixel count to ever exist. People conflate gear with skill and thats just not how it goes. Great video and great shots!
Thank you and great points made.
I really enjoyed your perspective. As a current Leica Q3 owner and have shot with many different camera brands, at the end of the day, it just comes down to our individual use cases. Our mileages do vary!
Mileage does vary. This doesn’t mean I won’t ever own a Leica again - but for my style and desire as of now it won’t be my primary camera for a while.
I have to agree with you on all fronts.
I purchased a used Fujifilm XPro-1 with a malfunctioning viewfinder for a crazy price here in Australia.
My brother-in-law, who's a professional photographer, keeps asking me if I'm using the XPro-1 for the family shots I share. He is always blown away with the results I get from this thing.
It's about learning how to use the camera, learn your style, learn about lighting, go out and shoot... This is what makes the camera shine in my opinion.
Shoot what inspires you, I say. I shot Leica M, Q, Q2 and Q2M for years, then decided to try "medium format" digital, first with the GFX system, then switching to Hassy X1D II. Fell in love with the Hassy, so I move to the X2D; that is by far my favorite camera to shoot for what I do. As for my EDC, it had been the OG Fuji X100 since I bought it new 13 years ago, but I switched to the X100 VI and absolutely love it, especially since it has IBIS (like my X2D) low light/night photography, as well as 4:3 and 5:4 aspect ratios (the two aspect ratios I shoot or crop to in my X2D. I love all my Leica glass, and I won't crap on the brand's gear, but for what I do, the Hassy X2D and X100 VI are my nirvana.
I find Leicas glass options definitely appealing, but they are extremely pricey for me. I just recently bought an M3 to use with a vintage Leica 50mm Summicron collapsible, but that’s because I enjoy the rangefinder experience so much. I’ve been shooting on 2 different ql17s for the last few years and enjoy that 50mm look so for me it made sense to get that M3.
In terms of my main photography though, I primarily use a Sony a7c and Pentax 67. Both of them have tons of great glass and a lot that can be had at a quite affordable price. If I sold all my Pentax gear and all my Sony gear I would just be able to afford a Leica digital body without a modern Leica lens. For me that trade off doesn’t seem worth it for what I can achieve with the gear I do have. Shooting leica has some unique benefits to the rangefinder experience and their glass but there’s significant downsides aside from cost and if those aren’t an issue to the photographer then I think it’s worth the trade off. I just ain’t one of them at the moment
You get tired hearing people complain about Leica prices. These cameras are made in a limited amount, in Germany by people with fair wages and decent living conditions and paid benefits and vacations top materials etc. It’s impossible to compare them with something built in factories in Asia.
Idc.
I’m not surprised
@@DeeRosahere again, not able to handle a different opinion. What clinical case.
@@seed157 how is this a different opinion? What a stretch. Explain that.
For me color science is what Lightroom is for 😊
Too funny that I see this video today. I’m contemplating pulling the trigger on the GFX 50 and using my Mamiya 645 glass on it simply because I’m craving that look! Perfect timing and thankful for hearing your heart on the subject.
Go for it!
Go for it. I have a GFX 50sII and have a complete set of Mamiya 645 glass. I use it with the Kipon focal reducer and the results are spectacular.
@@FirePhoenixAudiothank you! I’m looking forward to using the combo. I ended up ordering the GFX 50 sii
@@WayneMurphyjmkphotography Nice! Looks like someone else besides me will be rocking a Fuji GFX and M645 glass. Would also recommend the 65mm F1.4.
I almost made this move from fuji apsc line. In the end i ended up going with a nikon zf because i felt it made more sense for me, however, i would have loved to own a 50r
It’s nice to hear honest opinion towards Camera brands. Use the tool that makes you want to shoot more. The mitakon is a beast! Pentax 6x7 vibes🎉
Yup!
I have a Leica iiif and I would kill for an M4 but I am super happy with my Fujifilm X-Pro2. I like the range finder but the X-Pro2 gives me both. The reason I went was the control I got directly from the camera without the need for a computer. GFX looks like a very good system but way more than I want (cost) or need (quality). I am currently holding my breath for X-Pro4.
Same. Hoping the X-Pro 4 is great but I think I’ll be sticking to GFX for work and Leica for leisure on film for a long while.
I have the XP2 awesome camera but it wasn’t getting as much use as it deserves so I had the sensor modified to shoot IR now it’s getting plenty of use.
Welcome to the Fujifilm experience. I’ve been using Fujifilm for about 8 years and am very pleased with the results. I haven’t tried the GFX system. But I’ve been looking the GFX 50. BTW Fujifilm glass is pretty good too.
Fuji glass is great.
Love Leica cameras and lenses, but all the M series stuff did was bring pain to me and my wallet. Tried a few different bodies and maybe it was just luck of the draw, but ALL of them gave me issues with the VF. One would not stay in calibration, another suddenly had a broken roller that rolls when you turn the lens, etc. That and then how long the cameras are gone for fixing and maintenance...forcing you to slow down to take your photos has multiple meanings! Got tired of it and kept my APSC Leica and went the m43 route with a Lumix GX85. Honestly couldn't be happier. There's still a filmic look to the photos of the Lumix and TL2 that don't suffer from this current craze of how sharp a lens/sensor is. Glad to see you get the equipment that works for what you need and not being stuck in brand/sensor loyalty even though it doesn't benefit you.
Which Mitakon do you use? (Great video)
64/1.4
@@DeeRosa Thanks !
Beautiful images - there is a distinctive look. Love it!
Many thanks!
Sometimes gear ⚙️ isn’t the only thing, it’s the craft art we do 😅
Exactly.
I use a lot of Zeiss lenses on my GFX. I think you will get a lot of Leica qualities with that combo plus the added benefit of medium format look
Leica and Zeiss don’t use the same glass. I prefer the Zeiss look. Not looking for the Leica look.
@@splootan lmao bro you’re mad I don’t respond to you on IG.
The Leica look comes predominantly from the sensor or colour processing. I noticed then when I adapted a cheap old Nikon lens with a cheap adapter onto a SL2-S and the results were amazing. I did not expect that. The images had the Leica look and in most cases there would be no way to tell the difference. It shocked me but it was also revealing.
Great video. Like you I prefer to be brand agnostic simply because each offers distinct characteristics with similar technical capabilities. So I personally never see the benefits of 100% brand loyalty because our creative journeys could be far more fulfilling if we explored different aspects of photography. I personally shoot digital photos using my Fujifilm X-T5 and Leica MP-240 but love shooting 35mm film with my vintage Canon III and Leica M3. I also shoot 120 film using a Mamiya TLR. This collection took me a while to gather but at no point did I let brand be guiding force. I looked at what each piece could do and the kind of build quality and functionality I wanted and could afford with savings along the way.
Great input. Every camera is a piece of equipment. Not a personality trait.
how would you compare the image output of xt5 vs m240?
Easiest way to describe medium format look is longer lens, wider FOV. Not sure why more don’t sum it up this way.
Always like the content Dee 🙏
🤝🏽
'More compression' is cited here as an advantage of medium format but that is a myth.
Check out a video by magic wedding photographer titled 'Lens Compression: APS-C Mode vs Full Frame on Sony A7R V'
@@definingslawek4731 it’s not that it’s “more compression”. The lens is the focal length it says it is, as with APS-C being wider. What I said is true.
@@LIGHTHUNTER.D What do you mean by that? The lens being the focal length it says it is changes nothing besides depth of field, and with digital medium format lenses being slower than FF, there is NO change.
I mean, besides the fact that at f4 for example on the 50mm equiv medium format lens, the depth of field will be shallower than at f4 on the FF lens.
But you can just open up the aperture on the ff, and ff has more opportunity for shallow DoF anyway.
DoF is the only difference I can think of really. It works between aps c or smaller formats like phones and full frame. A phone has an f1.8 lens so it gets the same exposure as your full frame camera at f1.8, but given the same FOV it will have a much deeper depth of field simply because it's like a 1-10mm lens instead of like a 75 or whatever.
I know many others have said it already but I wanted to definitely state that your perspective and confidence at it is so inspiring. I shoot Sony but always loved the color and depth of Fuji. I thought about Leica at one point but decided to stick with Sony as that’s what I’m familiar with. Thanks for voicing this and not sticking in the Leica #1 just because of the brand echo chamber! 🙏
Appreciate it
My 50R is now my every day carry, even with the 55 1.7. The weight is just something I’m happy to deal with. I’m pleased Fujifilm didn’t release an X-Pro4 as it pushed me irreversibly into Fujifilm’s version of MF.
Same here!
I have a Pentax K1000 that my mother bought me back in 1987 or so. It’s built like a tank and still works totally fine including the light meter. I own 2 Leica film cameras and M3 and a new M-A, Leicas are smoother operating- esp the M-A, I use Zeiss glass- it is better than the Pentax glass but not gonna lie all things being equal I can produce identical or nearly identical results on all three cameras.
"its a skill and user issue, if you can't create good images with it. its not an issue of the camera."
well said sir, well said.
Agree, got the Leica for the feeling, thinking process, and its size for travel
I’m more amazed how you can do sport photojournalism with Fuji AF, here I’m having hard time to capture my daughter running with xp2
I agree that the Leica camera itself doesn't necessarily bring anything unusual to the table. In fact they really make you feel like getting less while paying more is a feature. But Leica glass....that's the sauce that is what is Leica. I'll never sell my M and R lenses. They will forever live on adapted to my Sony Alphas and FX6.
Gotta be real, still struggling too making the transition from DSLR to mirrorless. I really like the shots per second ability of the mirrorless systems. But up until last year, I was still shooting sports photography (as a hobbyist) with a Canon EOS 5DS. Timing matters and understanding the environment matters more than the tools, no matter the brand.
Amen. I was still shooting a 1DX into 2023. Nothing wrong with DLSR and most of the colleagues in sports still prefer them.
Season of life/career/creativity is key. Great points in this video
Thank you 🙏
Hey Dee, big fan of your work. Was hoping to get your option as to whether the Fuji XT5 or Sony A7iv would be better for portrait photography.
I don’t have an opinion on the comparison. Both will work fine. Both will get the job done. Both won’t be so different that anyone be able to tell what camera you have or one another is better.
Go for what’s in your budget.
That Mitakon has a special look for sure. I almost moved over to the 50R just to use that combo.
It’s a dream and have a great look for environmental portraits.
@@DeeRosa Which Mitakon are you referring to? Thanks.
Sold my M system cams also for a GFX50R, def am not sad. Is the 50r perfect... nope, but def makes me happy to use. Slap some nice M mount lenses on there and its amazing. Also, you get that Xpan crop ratio built in!
It’s not perfect at all but it’s the best for what I need 🤷🏻♂️
Photography has been my life since I was a teen I’m lucky enough to work in newspapers I shoot every day for work or on personal projects I’ve shot and continue to shoot many brands and formats one thing I started doing just for channel content was to pick up old gear and try to make a nice shot or two sometimes it works sometimes not but I always enjoy the experience and that for me is what matters enjoying the experience no matter what you have in your hand….camera wise 😂
Back to the 50R!! I love mine but sometimes think of the 50S II for my preferred needs.
It’s all about the journey and fun. Like the look of the GFX, not had a play, but had a play with hassleblad.
I tape my cameras up so people can not see what I am using on the street, especially leica as the kit attracts to much attention.
Great video. Have fun. 🙂
I just got my buddy to switch from Fuji to Leica 😆😆. Thanks for sharing your experience. As long as you like the tool you use, thats all that matters 💯
Totally agree!
I had the GFX 50R and the GFX 100S, and the color science or the look coming from the 50R was better. Now I'm using a Leica SL, which I like even more. Hasselblad xd2 is also amazing, the colors are amazing.... But lacks in other departments, it's slow and etc.
Do you have any tests with the fujifilm in super low light/ how high can you push ISO before it becomes unusable? I love the medium format and am wondering if I can take it into a lowlight scenario. I shoot alot of candid club/nightlife and just night scapes. Most of which I do wide open on a 35mm 1.8 + ISO 3200 w/ my sony a7iv (fullframe mirrorless). I focus manually and have just started using glass that is .95. I think shooting medium format would be awesome but the ISO handling I've had with the Sony has been unmatched especially for my niche super lowlight interests. I do wanna dip into medium format though and would love to hear any insight.
I don’t have any tests like that and I won’t test that or do any tests - my videos are made with info and footage from actual use at jobs I’m hired for; I don’t worry about high iso because I don’t care about digital noise being in my shot. If it’s there, it’s there.
@@DeeRosa Yeah totally. I'm not asking for a video testing it out. Just curious if you have made personal observations while shooting. Its always cool to hear the use + limits of cameras from people who actively use them to create, not from dudes who do tech review channels and are obsessed with specs / cycle through gear every month.
It can handle 3200 well with little noise.
@@Grumpygrumpo thank you!
Spot on, agree with 100% with you on this video, exactly how I always felt about Leica and also thinking of investing in the GFX system. This video came in the right time!
Hope this helped!
Good honest video man. This is what we need on here. Well done!
Always!
Hello love video, can you tell how to get these colors you have from your leica i am strugglining a lot with it?
I edit my raw images and play with the colors.
Hotttt takes! I've shot them all and I love my Leica's and I love film, but I get it. I have other cameras and I appreciate that you appreciate it all but made the choice that works for you. I was super close to grabbing that GFX 50R too. Beautiful camera. Have fun. Make great work.
This is practically how I always feel when I think of my switch from Sony back to Nikon and Fuji. Sony is popular, I didn't exactly enjoy shooting it after I picked up a Z6II. Didn't like the build quality or the digital hotshoe Sony was using so bailed. Fast forward a handful of years and Sony is gone and Nikon and Fuji are back in a big way and I even invested in a GFX100S. It's money, but I'm a happier shooter for it.
I appreciate this rant and I agree with you so many people are hilarious with their brand alliances speaking of someone with a GFX 50 R I like it, M1 M previous Q2 owner and a Sony a seven CR Owner, as well as a Fujifilm X pro three Owner all of these cameras offer their own inspirations and their own form of beauty and aesthetics in the images they produceand then comes down to your eye your passion, your inspiration, your artistry, ensure your technical skill in your technique
Nice truth bomb video 👍. I shoot all kinds of different cameras, and it all depends on what your goal is image-wise. I like the camera that gives me the shortest, simplest way to get there. For portraits, that's a GFX 50R, for exactly the reasons you mentioned. But when I shoot dance, as soon as it becomes dynamic, i simply have to switch to an R5 because the AF gets in the way (and I can't reliably focus manually with that 50R viewfinder: kudos to you 👍). Have shot both subjects on a Leica M before, and it definitely can be done. But it has limitations. Tell you what though: if I grab a camera to take with me on holiday, it's an M. I love small and simple.
Same move for me! For action it’s one camera. For doc and portrait it’s the GFX. For travel it’s my Olympus Pen FT or Leica. They’re all just hunks of metal that do different things.
@@DeeRosa Exactly 🙂.
I wish the gfx50r had a hybrid optical viewfinder like my Xpro3 , not the biggest fan of EVF
breath of fresh air in the UA-cam photography space. Glad to hear someone always keeping it real
Appreciate that.
Honestly, I think for most of the famous photographers who used Leica rangefinders long ago, if you gave them the preference on what to use today, they would go for a more practical camera than the M6 or whatever Leica. It's whatever gets the job done and in those days they didn't have many options. Like I bet the pros of old missed a lot more shots because of the challenges that old cameras gave them, even though they were very good at using them, than they would today.
I appreciate your GenX level of self confidence. Also agree with your assessment and take.
I’m not Gen X so I have no idea what that means.
Oh I know. Just saying that you have self-confidence like they do. @@DeeRosa
@@71co0k ah gotcha 🫡
Nothing about medium format affects compression. Compression is a matter of distance from the camera, not of format...
Yeah sorry bucko I misspoke and cut out a part where I talked about the compression of longer focal lengths with a wider FOV on larger formats. Hope this helps you.
In my opinion, at some point when you work hard and get exceptionally good at what you do you can shoot with everything. At this stage of your career gear not only should be able to keep up with you but also bring you joy. I use my Sony' A7R5 x2 for assignements and M11-P just for fun. I love working with sony because it's reliable and doing my personal projects on Leica because i love the process of ragefinder. There's no good or bad answear, Fujifilm makes great cameras so I wouldn't listen to those comments.
Exactly. There is no good or bad and I like every brand. I use a lot of cameras if they fit my work flow. It’s about the work not the brand.
My main camera is a Leica MD262 which I like-a very much. Shoots like film whilst a digital camera. I shoot film with a Nikon F2. One day I prefer the images from film on the other day it`s digital. How`s that for a shoot out...!
Valid point Dee, ya gotta do what ya gotta do.
That’s all it is.
I agree with the hot boy wearing the Miami FC jersey. Ya you don't need the M10R. GFX for your work makes all the sense.
Thanks for understanding - now can you source me a Yashica Mat 124 G?
@@DeeRosa TBH probably could I'll hyu
Gfx color depth is *chefs kiss*
Giving renewed meaning to “Texas Leica”. Keep doing what you do!
That's the plan!
always love your videos deeee!
You're the best!
This video could have been an email, “You cannot buy a bad camera in 2024. Shoot what works for you.”
Taking the piss out of Brand A over Brand B is a weak move for “engagement”. It demeans an otherwise happy little channel I thought I found.
Hey man I really dgaf but I hope you get what you need to get out of your hissy fit.
@@DeeRosalol the guy just gave an honest opinion and you call it a "hissyfit" grow up 👆 ur having hissyfits anyone gives a criticism
i love how you explain not a lot of people arent going to notice the look and feel of leica, and then explain you switched because of the look and feel of fuji...which a lot of people arent going to notice.
Did I say I switched for others or for me? I’ll wait for the correct answer.
key difference is you're a working photographer with actual experience and a lot of other camera channels are just salesmen for whatever company invites them/flies them out to their new camera launch trips
this isn't in reference to leica vs fujifilm btw, just that i'm always going to watch a channel like yours over the vast majority of others that are out there currently doing brick wall lens distortion/sharpness "tests" and pointless autofocus tests in perfect conditions like you mentioned
I appreciate that perspective of me
Ever think about the SL series. It has become my favorite without the Leica ecosystem.
I have but if I’m gonna have an SLR I’d prefer a medium format.
Honest question: You mention those who deliberately choose a system that helps them slow down, by demanding a bit different workflow approach - and you dismiss their reason and claim user error.
Is there a possibility that you were a bit too quick when jumping to that conclusion? Or do you really mean that choosing a tool that slows your process down to gain a more deliberate way of shooting is a useless argument?
I am not in the slow down camp myself, but I don’t quite see how such a broad generalisation is warranted.
@geiranders70 You misunderstood my statement and I’m not sure why; I am not against the slow down crew but I don’t subscribe that you have to get a certain camera or only ONE brand in order to accomplish that. It can be done with any camera system. It’s a choice. It doesn’t have to be a Leica. It can be a DSLR, it came be a Fuji.
I did not dismiss that notion at all and was very clear that the user error was on those who choose not to slow down not those who don’t “buy the right camera”.
You can slow down even with the fastest Sony. If you WANT :)
Fujifilm Pro Tip: turn on clarity (+ or - doesnt matter) ;-)
Listen again; he is right. Your "speed" is generally a function of you; not necessarily the car. IOW - a fast car can be driven slowly. It's a fuction of the pressure on the pedal.
sucks fuji quit making this cam. I would love it if they made a new version of it.
Great Video Dee, you do an excellent job.
Thank you.
You should start a podcast, bro! Unless you already have one and I'm just out of touch with that info lol
this
Maybe one day but I don’t make time for YT so I don’t know if I’d make time for that 😅
i love how you dont sugarcoat shit. Its always good to be blunt and not try to cater to the normies. im glad i follow you, your videos are always interesting.
i also laughed when youre talking serious for ten minutes straight and all of a sudden you say "megapickles" hahaha
Thank you 🤝🏽
I do like Fujifilm.
Yeah. Same.
Beautiful shots duder 🫡
i wish there was medium format x100 style point and shoot
Same.
99% of people don't get that the camera is the tool that meets your workflow in order to achieve your results. Period.
My workflow is similar to yours, so I totally get your point and agree with you that people who are complaining about a brand can't use their tools.
The same goes for a music producer, a videographer or any industry, not only creatives.
FUjifilm for the WIN (at least for my workflow :) )
Another great video, my friend.
Great comment. 100% the truth.
Hey, we all want new things. Enjoy your new camera !!
PREACH BROTHER!!!!!! well put Dee, when I hear other photographers talk about "slowing down" it cracks me up. Great video thanks for always keeping it real! ✊✊
Just slow down where you are - you don’t have to wait for a certain camera for that.
I thought you already shot with Fujis? I only bought a fuji because of your videos!!
Leica has been my full time stills camera for professional work for the last 3 years except for with sports.
Fujifilm US sends me gear to review and I’ll use it on assignments from time. I am now fully using Fujifilm for all professional work for the first time since 2018.
Glad your so skillful mate !
I try
Back again with another banger! 🔥🔥🔥
Best reason: You can sell one Leica and buy lots of Fuji stuff! LOL! Looking forward to the images! Have a great day Dee!
Thank you!
Rock it and have fun buddy
If your technique is good, 35mm will often surpass Medium format! A pro friend one day shot a few frames with his Leica-M and the 135mm Elmarit with goggles. A few days later, I was shown the prints! Stunning detail and tones! You want a larger format, great! It's a great big Fuji camera, it's not really same size as even 645! I don't actually care!
Two things: a Leica M-A with 135mm & Goggles is bigger than my current GFX setup.
Second thing is for someone who don’t actually care - it sounds like you really care in the whole comment. If your professional friend actually exists I’m sure he’d agree with me, a professional, that choosing a camera for a certain type of work is never an issue except to fan boys who have to defend their favorite brand.
If it ain’t matter - you wouldn’t have made this argument that doesn’t even translate and makes it seem like you watched the video angrily.
I think it just comes down to what you prefer to use and whatever inspires you to go make photos. If you want an M6 and that makes you excited to shoot, then I say spend your money and get an M6. Same goes for a Hassy, F3, AE1. Not only is it that though but is it a tool than can get the job done?
There are plenty of folks doing commercial work with brands like Oakley, GUESS, Dior etc etc that still use 5diii's (which I love), and more creative work where people are shooting on $100 polaroid cameras in that same space. The endless talk about gear is so silly.. just use what you want.
I was in Rome for a few days... All I saw were Nikons and Canons. Few Sony and very little to non fujifilms. One leica.
Well said
Great post ✌🏽
Thanks for listening
Well said.
Thanks.
I’m not brand loyal at all instead I had to force myself to settle down a bit….so now just Fuji and Nikon. I’ve had quite a few leicas but I never really thought much about their image quality…..that’s why it was easy to let it go.
That’s what I gotta do.
Always been a fan of your videos. Fuchi at that jersey. 😂
Lmao 😂 just a futbol fan is all 😂
He said I do this for real I’m really like that😂!🔥
😅
👍 good choice.
Thanks 👍
Lemme scoop that summi on my way through Texas
It sold 🥺
Medium format and zeiss glass will beat full frame every day. Even in the film days this was true
Man, you really should watch the DPReview video on debunking the "medium format look"
The video where all they proved is if you match equivalencies on all fronts you can get a similar image? I’ve seen it. That same video also shows that micro 4/3 and APSC is the same as full frame and there’s no benefit tho? Does it not?
They didn’t debunk the medium format look however. You get more compression at a wider field of view and it’s fine. It doesn’t mean FF sucks. But DP review did a horrible job with that video to appease FF shooters and it was a hack job. Everyone knows you have a wider FOV in larger formats. It’s been that way since wet plate 16x20 to 8x10, 4x5, 6x9 etc. to say something that’s always been true is now a lie because people are upset about a truth is irresponsible.
Duh? APS-C and mft really give you the same look as FF if you keep focal length and aperture equivalent. 50mm f/2 on FF really does look like 25mm f/0.95 on mft, I've checked personally.
Moreover, it is not really fair to use film MF as an argument, because the difference in size between digital MF and FF is even less than between APS-C and FF. 6x9 is in another universe compared to 33x44.
Also, MF lenses are usually way darker than FF, so you won't get any benefit resolution- or depth of field- wise compared to Sony a7RV, for example (btw Sony is shit).
So man, grab any 50mm f/1.4 and compare it to, let's say, GFX 63mm f/2.8. FF 50mm would give you shallower depth of field.
@@mvks1mally I know it does I made a whole as video about it lmao.
You don’t understand that what I’m talking about has nothing to do with the BS that DP review was talking about. They made a click bait video. Again, what I said wasn’t wrong and it was true.
If I can get a 35mm FOV with 50mm compression on MF and that same lens won’t give you that on FF.
So my 65mm 1.4 would need a 50mm 1.0 on FF to match… do you own a 50mm 1.0 to match that? If so - great! But I don’t care because the look I want is easily obtainable on MF.
Yall aren’t saying I’m wrong because you have fact - yall are saying I’m wrong because it offends someone’s opinion of FF. Which idgaf about.
Preach!