The only thing it proves is that Many Worlds apart of being Postmodernistic metaphysical nonsense and being unable to explain how branching occurs doesn't really get you rid of observers. Maybe it's gravity (as Sir Roger Penrose proposes) maybe it's Von Neumanns Counsciosness but something HAVE to collapse superpositions or you get Flat Earther nonsense!(world eternally frozen in superpositions)
Both questions I hoped would be asked-that I've never seen asked before-were asked. And, when one wasn't quite answered, it was followed up on. EXCELLENT work, great interview, and most of all, thank you for exploring this topic with the seriousness it deserves!!!
Pioneering physicist Sir James Jeans wrote: “The stream of knowledge is heading toward a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter, we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter. Get over it, and accept the inarguable conclusion. The universe is immaterial-mental and spiritual.”
@@chetanpatil1654 No, The Lasts words God spoke to my right ear from Heaven were " You are Princess Messenger of God." I spoke to a priest I never met. We spoke about a few things God said to my ear. We spoke about Jacob and Joseph and the well and Ladder. He said, he was a little jealous. When I was leaving Immediately got a text on my phone from Wells Farg to reset the security code for the account of Sarah Malachai. Whose name means Princess Messenger of God. I called the bank. They were stumped. God too has a sense of humor. I'm certainly proof of that. His first words to my right ear from Heaven was 8.4.2015. Beside a burning spider web that did not burn. I never saw anything like that. It was morning. I had read some of the newspaper, was drinking Chai tea and ready to do the crossword puzzle. I was astounded.
Any kind of measurement involves things that are part of the universe and these always interact, interfere with it or whatever, I don't think we have a super clear demonstration of how the consciousness determines the clump pattern instead of the interference pattern. But these experiments may potentially help us better understand consciousness or if we understood consciousness by other means we could better understand this experiment and ultimately more about quantum world.
Yes, this is the biggest mystery which understanding will bring a correct understanding of our World. This mystery is explained in my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"
Yes, it is a big mystery and has no current scientific explanation. If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend you my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
The observer gives the world the power to come into being, through the very act of giving meaning to that world; in brief, No consciousness; no communicating community to establish meaning? Then no world!" - Physicist John Wheeler
The Cosmos is the power to be. I use the term be rather than being because be represents a continuous tense. The observer measures a portion of the world and it is that instance of the world that they interact with.
"A delayed choice quantum eraser experiment, first performed by Yoon-Ho Kim, R. Yu, S.P. Kulik, Y.H. Shih and Marlan O. Scully, and reported in early 1999, is an elaboration on the quantum eraser experiment that incorporates concepts considered in Wheeler's delayed choice experiment. The experiment was designed to investigate peculiar consequences of the well-known double slit experiment in quantum mechanics as well as the consequences of quantum entanglement. The experiment supports the observer effect in quantum measurements. … "Further studies have shown that even observing the results after the experiment leads to collapsing the wave function and loading a back-history as shown by delayed choice quantum eraser." Basically, what causes the collapse is knowledge. And knowledge requires a knower. "The observer plays a key role in deciding the outcome of the quantum measurments - the answers, and the nature of reality, depend, in part on the questions asked."
That cause problems because then science cannot do experiments about the nature of reality without biasing their results. With retrocausality means the history of the Cosmos is being backfilled based on what happens in the future.
Knowledge doesnt cause the collapse the measurement, particle and wave interference causes decoherence or what you call "collapse". Dont fall into the pit of pseudoscience and new age spirituality.
The problem with his example of the planet not being a planet without an observer, but instead just a big bunch of atoms, starts to fall apart when you include tha fact that there will bo no wavefunction collapse without the observer. Without a collapse, the only thing that exists are particles existing as possibilities without being in a knowable location. The only thing that makes sense is that there is another level below the Quantum level that existed before the Big Bang and that whatever else may be true of that level, what must be true is it is fundamentally conscious in some incomprehensible way. Until we are willing to acknowledge that possibility, and start searching for it, nothing will ever make sense.
John Archibald Wheeler said: "It begins to look as if we ourselves, by a last minute decision, have an influence on what a photon will do when it has already accomplished most of its doing...we have to say that we ourselves have an undeniable part in shaping what we have always called the past. The past is not really the past until it has been registered. Or put it another way, the past has no meaning or existence unless it exists as a record in the present." A conscious choice affects the behavior of previously measured, but unobserved particles. Physicist Asher Peres, who elaborated the experimental results with his delayed choice for entanglement swapping, says: "If we attempt to attribute an objective meaning to the quantum state of a single system, curious paradoxes appear: quantum effects mimic not only instantaneous action-at-a-distance but also, as seen here, influence future actions on past events, even after these events have been irrevocably recorded." Our choice affects how the particle acted in the past. The factor of time has nothing to do with quantum mechanics. This was predicted by quantum mechanics and the exact same result is what we see when we put it to experimental test.
Are choice does not affect how particles behave. What is happening is we are a quantum object as well and are described by quantum physics. It is easier to describe humans as a classical object because we can ignore quantum effects in everyday cases. What is really happening is we get entangled with the particle when we measure it. Now we are sharing information with the particle. We were not entangled with the Cosmos throughout all of time so we had no effect on the earlier moments. The past was created by other particles acting as an observer.
When quantum events are observed it means that particular possiblities are observed and others ruled out by the observation. Every system that is observed is observed in a certain state, which means other states are ruled out by making the observation. I don't see the problem, or that it brings in anything woo woo. The thing is, when we try to understand, we end up committing ourselves to a theory
Is Aguirre leaving the door open to the possibility that our large, wet, warm squishy brains give rise to a consciousness that acts as the observer which collapses the wave functions that allows us to observe the macro world we know via our first experience? I'm aware of what a gross oversimplification this description is but this seems to be what he is suggesting. Is he saying there is a whirling, buzzing reality of the quantum scale realities which remain in a set of superpositions that we instantiate in terms of what we can understand or appreciate by the psychological act of personal observation via our senses? It seems that our human experiences may be as if we were on the froth of reality of which the fundamental realities are much more different and basic and exist at many layers "below." We are dealing the idea of the world rather than the ontological reality of the world.
Max Tegmark suggests that the impact of a single photon is sufficient to initiate "collapse of the wave function". A self aware "observer" is not necessary.
You may have already come across the three publications of Robert Lanza explaining the Physics and the logical mechanics OF HOW, and also explaining the WHY of their being something rather then nothing: the necessity of conscious observers inorder for EXISTENCE ???
The fact of an inner observer experiencing its sensation means experience orders motion. Motion may only be ordered from a fixed vantage point. You're it, a continuity of identity, where the fact of your continuity is the only thing which could bring order to experience. Run with that ball to get somewhere. Otherwise, be perplexed by one's own confusion of terms.
Life and the observer, through the act of observation, transforms the superposition of probabilities of all things into a definite concrete state. (Lanza’s Biocentric Universe) The entire Universe itself since the Big Bang was just a superposition until life emerged on Earth 3 billion years ago to observe it. But query. Is not “life and the observer” itself also a superposition of probability in a quantum state? So how did it come into existence in the first place? A story for another day. (just my thoughts)
A fundamental conclusion of the new physics also acknowledges that the observer creates the reality. AS observers, we are personally involved with the creation of our own reality. Physicists are being forced to admit that the universe is a "mental" construction. - R.C. Henry, Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Johns Hopkins University , “The Mental Universe” ; (Nature 436:29,2005)
Actually, the Universe existed long before us and will be here long after us. We are not creating anything! This is a big "Mystery" because current science is bound to incorrect fundamentals. If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend you my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
@@Orion15-b9j You actually missed the point that Anthony was trying to make at the end. How do you know that the universe existed the way it is before sentient life? The universe existed, for sure, but it might existed in superpositions, or in the form of particles. What we see and perceive as planets or matter could've taken form when the first sentient life started to exist, or , we might actually be the only ones peceiving it this way. And yea, we can aproximate how the universe looked billions of years ago, but, we might perceive it that way, because that its how we can perceive it, or we can just collapse the wave function and get that "image"....or...how do we know that there werent sentient beings on a random planet even then? There are too many unknowns...everything is possible, and tbh, right now, objectively.....everything points to a conscious observer having an effect.Secientist trying to twist this fact and run from this truth, will impair their own advancement in explaining things. The scientific comunity should not dismiss this just because they dont like it..that is a dogmatic and :"religious:" attitude.They should take this pathway and explore it as much as they can.Ofc, if it really proves to be wrong, then dismiss it, but as long as its as possible as the other pathways, right now, maybe even more possible, they should take it into account a bit more.
I feel there's a similar dichotomy between quantum and classical physics, as exists between the materialist view of consciousness and, well, lots of other theories. Where does the observer effect fit in with the materialist view of consciousness? It really seems like there are at least two view of consciousness that are very well served by science, yet seem incompatible.
"A delayed choice quantum eraser experiment, first performed by Yoon-Ho Kim, R. Yu, S.P. Kulik, Y.H. Shih and Marlan O. Scully, and reported in early 1999, is an elaboration on the quantum eraser experiment that incorporates concepts considered in Wheeler's delayed choice experiment. The experiment was designed to investigate peculiar consequences of the well-known double slit experiment in quantum mechanics as well as the consequences of quantum entanglement. The experiment supports the observer effect in quantum measurements.
Wow, it's so interesting, all these questions and thoughts about the nature of reality. Weird to think that when I'm dead, it will be as if nothing ever existed at all.
To think is an abstract construct from the mind of an intelligence. And intelligence ... has free will ... to make abstract & physical constructs. Man is the only known intelligence in the Universe ... who has free will ... and a body & mind ... to make abstract & physical constructs. Only an intelligence ... makes Laws ( of Nature) and things ( of the Universe) with clear purpose, properties, form, design & function. Anything ... that has clear purpose, form, design, function ... and ... obeys a set of Laws ... ORIGINATE ... from the MIND of an intelligence. The mind of an animal which has consciousness is only physical( brain). The mind of Man is physical (brain) & non-physical( soul). The mind of the intelligence ... that made the Universe & Man ... is Spirit & very much "Almighty."
@@abelincoln8885 i like how you present this profound but very simple truth... Atheists are living in denial, in spite of the evidence... But, one adjustment i'd like you to consider in ur submission is that the brain is not different from the sole. The brain is a part of the sole simce it is a part of the physiology of the body. The mind, however is an abstract concept to describe the instrument or function of the brain to process information for humans. The mind makes humans what it is. The mind is like a software on the brain to activate free will. I have authorities from God's word...
Why do people cling to the belief in a mind-independent reality? It is surely because if there is no such reality, then ultimately (as far as we can know) mind alone exists. And if mind is not a product of real matter, but rather is the creator of the illusion of material reality (which has, in fact, despite the materialists, been known to be the case, since the discovery of quantum mechanics in 1925), then a theistic view of our existence becomes the only rational alternative to solipsism." ～ Richard Conn Henry is an Academy Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Johns Hopkins University, author of one book and over 200 publications on the topics of astrophysics and various forms of astronomy.
Mind as far as we know, cant exist without the brain. So no that easily discounted your claims. Our experience is illusory, but still it is concrete at our scale. There is a reason we arent passing through walls etc etc. Physics still applies, biology, neurology too. Dont get ahead of yourself and start spreading new age spiritual pseudoscience.
Can gravity waves be detected from classic mechanics, such as people, down to quantum mechanics? Are gravity waves occuring when current measurements of quantum mechanics are made?
What are measurement devices doing that effects subatomic / quantum mechanics? Do the measurement devices send out a subatomic / quantum signal, or have parts that detect quantum signals? Could mass of measurement device send out gravity waves that effects subatomic / quantum mechanics? In which case are people constantly effecting quantum mechanics through gravity waves from their mass?
Many thousands of clever experiments have been performed in the last one hundred years and the conclusion is that - "Conscious knowledge of the observer is collapsing wave functions of particles" This is the great current mystery in science. If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend you my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
To qualify as an observer, a structure must first be able to sense and interpret(preserve/save) a change in that particular dimension (physical environment)...
Those “premonitions” are in fact an illusion, they just give you an hint about everything being written beforehand. How could some things be written and not all the others anyway?
Everybody is an observer. The quantum information is traveling in an instant regardless of distance - (entangled particles). The conscious knowledge is collapsing the wave functions of particles and for the current science, this is the great mystery of all time. If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend you my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
@@Orion15-b9j be for i rush to your book..i just wana ask few question if i may so Can a blind man/woman observes in the same way normal people do? What do you mean when you say everybody is an observer? What is there to be observed and whats not? Is there anything that can't be observed? Is science the real method of understanding of the mystery of life or is there something else? I'm not a scientist nor a religious person.
@@kamabanjo1118 Science is the way of understanding things as long as the things that we want to understand are in the scope of the scientific method. The scientific method is bound by our level of understanding and perceiving the world. For us to understand more than what our level allows us to, we must evolve. I see 3 or 4 pathways of evolution: 1- biological, 2-technological, 3-mental and 4-spiritual (some might put spiritual and mental in the same category, because for them consciousness encompansses both). Life forms initially start to evolve biological(actually, they allways kinda of continue to do so, but its much slower after a certain point in the evolution is reached). After that, they start to use the material world and everything that they can perceive in order to create technology.The respective specie will evolve technological to a point, when technology isnt enough anymore, because every way of using the material world that exists in that corner of the universe was used, and the planet was kinda destroyed...so the next step is evolving mentally. This means...that the entire race must come to the conclussion that greed causes hate which causes destruction....so political systems must be changed in order for the individuals of the specie to start and understand each other. After that point is achieved, the next step is evolving spiritually. Technological advancements like automation will start to create a self sustaining enviroment (if used wisely of course), so people wont bother with small tasks anymore, but work on knowing THE SELF more, and generally be more happy. If observers really have the ability of collapsing the wave function, then this really implies that our thoughts can shape the world in some form pr to some extent, because we are literally creating and perceive thoughts just like we perceive the world(and created it in some form), which means that a specie that has thoughts full of love,compassion and beatuy would affect the enviroment at the planetary scale or even more, who knows.Ofc, everything I say can be just stupid, but....we dont really know how observers work yet, and we didnt have a world like this yet. Frequencies and vibrations play a role in this whole story, that one is clear...so if we all vibrate the same and in a positive way, we might evolve? Who knows...but even if I am totally wrong about this....something of this kind would not be bad for the human specie in any way or form....so if I am wrong..everything applies until the mental level heh
@@kamabanjo1118 From 'Nothing" even "God" cannot build anything! The Universe is built on the base of opposing symmetry, (as + and - ) but even "God" is using space for this purpose. Unfortunately, fewer and fewer people are able to think or create something
This video got me thinking ... try to imagine all the particles that make up your body ... then imagine one of those particles could "see" the universe, the way you as a person can see it, but now at the scale of a sub-atomic particle. There's vast distances between an atom's nucleus and it's electrons ... just like there's vast distances between the Earth and other planets, the Sun and other stars etc. This whole thing about observers seems to be to be a matter of scale.
How can we understand the world of particles? the world of any existing organisms, the macro, micro world? the cosmic world, the infinite universe? We have to dive in, like we're doing in our milky way, we have to imagine ourselves as a particle, not with the influenced mind of a human, but through observing and understanding the constructive function of these particles world, then we can imitate, computerize, and use all informations, and maybe find out why the wave function collapses. If I can't imagine myself in your world, I will never really understand you.
@@jakecostanza802 ha ha ha you're kidding, but I mean, with the informations we've got, we can imagine a simulation; for example a ball, you are a ball in a dead-end street surrounded by high buildings, you want to get out, so you start bouncing until you reach a flat roof, and from there on you bounce your way to what your purpose was. It's just the ability to imagine yourself in anything you want to, and that way understand other worlds and existences.
An observer is one who observes thyself,surroundings, essence of HUMANITY kindness compassion and "EXISTENCE of thyself and " something beyond " and may understand mathematics and science interactions but keep them at bay by the way. Thanks for the topic.
Maybe transition from quantum mechanics to classic mechanics when there is enough gravity; and back to quantum mechanics when there is not enough gravity?
Physiology of the Spiritual (Quick Guide) -The pleasurable “chills” or “goosebumps” (aka frisson) experienced when listening to music, watching movies, viewing art, dancing etc. is a sensation that is sustainable for long periods and increases in intensity with dedication. It is the sensation needed to enter altered states of consciousness known as the Jhanas as well as to self-induce out of body experiences from a meditative state (visualization techniques are also required for OBEs). -If you pursue this sensation within yourself by attempting to feel it as much as possible (all day, every day if you are able), it builds in strength significantly over time to the point where it becomes a full body sensation with the pinnacle being at the crown of the skull. You must become your own experiment as each individual’s set of beliefs and emotional reactions are unique. -One fundamental key to the sensation is to achieve states of genuine, positive emotions such as love, gratitude, inspiration, courage, joy, unity etc. Therefore, anything that enables you to feel these emotions will work. Conversely, anything that prevents these, will prevent your sensation. Control of thought is the key. -It is important to take a non-judgmental perspective of all things, including yourself, in order to cultivate acceptance and love within yourself. Try to be honest with yourself at all times. Trust your feelings and intuitions. -Be patient and be understanding of yourself if you think you are struggling. This is a progression and it will take some time to strengthen, especially while first beginning to induce in meditation, as your brain reforms its pathways via neuroplasticity (weeks to many months depending on effort). Love yourself unconditionally for the greatest success. -Your sensation will inevitably grow in strength with persistence and you will begin to feel it more easily to a broader range of stimuli. You will eventually realize it is not the stimuli at all, but only your emotional state and control of your mind/thoughts that matter. -It is this same sensation that monks attempt to achieve during meditation and chanting. The chants or mantras are to create vibrations in the chest which can help stimulate the sensation as well as to keep one’s focus single pointed. -It is the same sensation that “spirit runners” or indigenous long-distance runners attempt to achieve. Also called “runner’s high” in the west. -The current scientific term for the sensation is “Frisson” and it remains relatively unexplained in the public sector being reduced simply to a release of endorphins. -Other names include: Chakra Energy, Kundalini, Prana, Mana, Qi, Chi, Holy Spirit, life force, vibration among others depending on your cultural lens. -In the CIA analysis of the Gateway Process for consciousness it is described as “a self-stimulation of the pleasure centers in the brain caused by the circulation of a ‘current’ along the sensory cortex.” www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001700210016-5.pdf -Remember this sensation is sustainable and will increase in intensity. Much love.
Nope. Only an intelligence ... makes Laws ( of Nature) and things ( of the Universe) with clear purpose, properties, form, design & function. Man has known for thousands of years ... that the Universe & Life ... have an UNNATURAL or supernatural origin by an very very powerful intelligence. Religions are a natural phenomena and will always be observed because Man knows that only an intelligence makes Laws & things with purpose, design & function. Either all of the religions are wrong about the "supernatural" intelligence that made everything ... or ... there is one religion that is correct. The four major religions in the world today are: 1. Christianity ( a denomination of Judaism) 2. Islam ( pagan cult with corrupted teachings from Christianity) 3. Hinduism. 4. Atheism ( replaced "the gods" with theories/ideologies of "the man." Are all four of these religion wrong about the origin of the Universe & Life ... or is there one that has clearly identified the "Almighty" intelligence that made everything and clearly explains why? Is there one religion that that has greatly benefited the Human Race when its teachings & Laws are followed, ... and would result in complete chaos, disorder or the extinction of the Human Race if it never existed? There's a reason why the greatest & most influential Man in all of history ... is a Jew ... who said he is the promised Jewish Messiah and the Son of God ... sent by His Father ... to be a sin sacrifice to save the eternal Souls of anybody who believes ... from God's just nature to punish anybody who breaks THE LAW. Again. Only an intelligence .... makes LAW ... for an intelligence .. to think & behave in an "ideal" or good way ... and is enforced by the LAW maker otherwise there will be chaos, disorder and dire consequences. God created Man with a body & soul ... with free will and able to make abstract & physical constructs. Man was created perfect & was to live forever with God ... but only if he obeyed a simple Law. Man was warned by God that if he ate from the tree of knowledge he will die. The Universe we have today with the fixed Laws of Nature & increasing entropy ... began the moment Man( Adam & Eve) broke God's Law. God must enforce the Law and punish anybody who breaks his Laws( sin) but God Loves is sinful creation so much and doesn't want any to perish ... so he devised a means to save any who do break His Laws ... by simply believing in a Messiah(Savior) as a sin sacrifice. Only God could be a sin sacrifice that will satisfy a just God who must punish anybody who sins( breaks God's Laws). Everything makes sense ... when everything in the Universe ( matter/energy and Man) must obey a set of Laws ... that only come from an intelligence. Matter & energy must obey the Laws of Nature otherwise there will be chaos & disorder. Man must enforce the Laws he makes for Man ... otherwise there will be chaos & disorder. God must enforce the Laws he made for Man ... otherwise there will be chaos & disorder. Jesus name is Yeshua ... which means Salvation. For God so loved the world, that he sent his only begotten Son, so that they would not perish but have everlasting life. Again. Religions are a natural phenomena. Either all religions are wrong ... or ... there is only One that is obviously correct, and the Human Race would be screwed, without.
To observe for a human means to have a subjective experience. Observation is all about consciousness and has nothing to do with the world. We do not experience the world. We experience our experiences and where they exist is unknown.
This man is giving a nearly perfect description, in western science terms, of the essence of Vedanta. Distinguishing seer and seen becomes the sole purpose of human existence. Indeed, all existence. And Vedic seers projected a day when pure objectivity, now known as western science, and pure subjectivity, a state of yoga, become one.
No, even when the machine is on, but nobody looking into the screen to see the results, the particles are waves, until a conscious observer starts looking at the screen. If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend you my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
Interaction Theory: Those who cite the Interaction Theory to belittle the role of Consciousness forgot a basic foundation in the Double Slit Experiment. If the test particle passes thru the slit with interactor detector = then congratulations. They are correct. Interaction is the cause of the collapse of the wave function. But how about the other slit where there is no interactor detector? How can Zero Interaction have any meaning at all, and collapse the wave function, unless a Conscious Mind, reasoning out with logic, creates meaning, or imbues Zero Interaction with meaning, resulting to spooky collapse of the wave function despite Zero Interaction?
A simple view of quantum mechanics is to say that everything has an Uncertainty Principle. For microscopic objects this is a wavelike principle based upon the properties of the synthesis of an entity from a bundle of pilot waves. For macroscopic objects it is a particle-like principle based upon classical Brownian motion on the same scale. The boundary between the two scales is normally likely to be round about the Planck mass, except for the rare case of a chain reaction such as the detonation of nitrogen tri-iodide by an alpha particle. There will be a destruction of unitarity in the interaction between classical Brownian motion and the wave function. At the microscopic level, unitarity is destroyed by the triple nonlinear interaction between the wave function, the electromagnetic field and tachyonic Brownian motion. TBM is otherwise orthogonal to the wave function.
I cannot argue against your logical view. Everything is exactly as you are describing. My argument is only if there is a simple explanation of the mystery of particle superposition and the act of conscious observation. If there is an explanation, then this is changing everything and we have to re-consider how the Universe works. Right or wrong, I am trying to provide this explanation. I will be more than happy if somebody proves me wrong by facts, logic, and the Law of Physics, but I cannot agree with baseless rejection.
Is it the work of physicists to "prove what exists"? Existence is an ontological assertion. Is measurement an ontological interaction? Whether it's the human eye or a glass lens or a scale, does it matter what a thing is for the interaction to register? For a scale it doesn't matter if it's an elephant or a car for the measurement to be 5000 pounds. Similarly for an eye or a lens, it doesn't matter if it's a car or an elephant as long as it's in focus, it records or registers. For a "subatomic particle", whether it's an electron or muon or positron, the measurement is about the thing. It's not just registering position or velocity, it's telling you there is an "electron" there or the "electron" is moving. The interpretation of the measurement includes an ontological assumption about what you're measuring. Matter without space and time, extension and duration, is...what? A scale just tells you weight, it doesn't tell you what you're weighing. It's assumed you know what you're weighing. The apparati that measure the position and velocity of "subatomic particles" do they also tell you what the particles are? Or is that also assumed? What is velocity or position without the "thing that moves" or the "thing at rest"? Measurement is not a proof of existence is it?
Don't be so harsh to the scientists. They are confused and really have no answer to this mystery because they are restricted by the wrong fundamentals of the "Standard Model" If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
Science does not prove what exists they explain what exists. There is no way to prove wha exists or what is real on can only state what is not real or what does not exists. That is why what’s the origin of the Cosmos question cannot be answered.
It's not about observers. The observer could be a dead body. The effect comes when a measurement is instantly recorded on the holographic surface of the universe.
Those who cite the Interaction Theory to belittle the role of Consciousness forgot a basic foundation in the Double Slit Experiment. If the test particle passes thru the slit with interactor detector = then congratulations. They are correct. Interaction is the cause of the collapse of the wave function. But how about the other slit where there is no interactor detector? How can Zero Interaction have any meaning at all, and collapse the wave function, unless a Conscious Mind, reasoning out with logic, creates meaning, or imbues Zero Interaction with meaning, resulting to spooky collapse of the wave function despite Zero Interaction?
Does a creator God count as an Observer? Or do observers simply see the effects of the creator? Or can God be both creator and observer prior to humanities creation?
Cosmic Consciousness exists before humans existed . Consciousness that drives everything into place especially the evolution of plants and animals . A perfect example would be evolution of mimicry . A plant that looks like an animal or insect . An insect or animal that looks like a plant .. The consciousness~ soul is like water. The water in my dispenser (is like a soul) will eventually go back to the ocean (which is like the immortal Spirit). There is only one Collective consciousness (Collective Spirit) in the universe similar to only one Collective water in the vast ocean of space (or universe). Reference: Water has Memory by Jacques Benveniste and Luc Montagnier experiments.
Particles Superposition and the mystery of "Measurement" is the biggest mystery in science. It is explained in my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"
… or are there more observers after all? Suspense music comes in. Hearts start bumping. Expectant silence. Voice-off appears in a cheerful manner: “we can relax everyone, our religious beliefs have been confirmed, it's what we always thought it was. How reassuring can that be, being right all along? I think we did a great job. Round of applause to all of us”. The end… Or is it?
I have noticed that most of the thieves believe that they own what they have stolen! not only that: they use thievery as patching techniques and irrationality itself is what attracts them to each other, lucky.....
There is no objective world everything IS subjective. Quantum physics has been telling us that our world is not mechanical and non-physical for a hundred years now. Everything exists as computed probability until an observer observes it. Things you cannot directly observe like quantum particles don't exist as actual particles until information is available describing that particle through a measuring apparatus for a observer to observe.
Aatmiya DIVINITY HARE KRSNA Experiencing happiness observing this interview "What Are OBSERVERS? Observers are Consciousness able to Observing Objects of Experience and becoming AWARE there feel 😊-😂-❤-😮 Observer is a part *OF" Universe and therefore Observer is *IN* Universe.😅😅😅😅😅
@@dAvrilthebear Yea, and stop Russia for voting to sustain the Libia Operation which gave the UN green light, and help the people who were killed in the streets by Gaddafi forces, the same people who were very gratefull for UN intervention, and stop Sadam Hussein from making genocide after genocide.
The last minute of the video is a perfect example of how stupid this whole "observer" crap is. Yes, atoms and planets (and by extension, their quantum bits) are still there even if people aren't there to observe them.
How do you know that? Time traveler perhaps? That last minute was pure reality. The concept of planet is created by consciousness. That’s a fact. And all of the relations and functions and so forth also are born from consciousness. Do you think you have some sort of direct link to truth?
I agree. Other planets and moons in our solar system have craters that were created by impacts that happened long before animals existed on Earth. We can even see which impacts happened before others, based on overlapping craters. So things were definitely happening before we were here to think about them.
@@johnskujins8870 Ok but you’re by default denying the wave function collapse interpretation of quantum mechanics. Right? Because you can’t have it both ways. The observation of the craters technically collapses the probability function of the quantum system. That happens, not prior to observation. That is, according to the prevailing scientific paradigm. So which alternative theory of particle physics do you tend to favor and how does it deal with this issue?
Man has always known ... the origin of anything that has purpose, form, properties, design & FUNCTION, and Law. Everything in the Universe has clear purpose, form, design & FUNCTION and obey a set of Laws The "observer" is a natural phenomena ... because only an intelligence has free will ( mind) to think, believe, say, do ... or observe ... AND make abstract & physical FUNCTIONS with clear purpose, properties, form & design. Everything in the Universe ... is an abstract ( time, space, Laws) or physical (matter, energy) FUNCTION ... made by an "observer" ... for an "observer." An elemental particle only "appear" to be everywhere but it is not. All elemental particles are vibrating or moving at or near light speed over subatomic distances. Throw a vibrating ball ... and its path will be like a "wave function." But it is still just a ball. Nothing less, nothing more.
what can I say: they built a whole dome of one rotten grain "defective irrational logic". but lately they can build a whole dome of many stolen grains ! lucky apes, it is their own paradise. the apes found a treasure.
Perhaps the entire universe existed as sort of a huge Copenhagen Shroedinger's Cat in a Box state of multipotential, until true sentience evolved. Then the entire past collapsed into this state. Which could mean that =we= are not necessarily a consciousness sufficient to be an observer. That could happen millions or billions of years from now, but to everything in the universe, there is one timeline that results in the evolution of a consciousness sufficient to collapse the wavefunction.
Hmmm.. EVERYTHING is possible. Questions, questions. How many sides to that coin are there? Why are we living THIS possibility? Are we living them all? LOL, Sometimes I want to trade places with me.
This is the single most divisive issue in physics if you ask me. The idea of the "observer" often get's misconstrued as a "conscious observer" which lets woowoo artists like Deepak Chopra fool masses of people into believing he is the arbiter of truth, when in reality he is selling BS so that he can adorn his glasses with diamonds. There is sooo much woowoo around this concept that it does a grave disservice to physics. This needs to get sorted out. Lawrence asked the right questions here: 1) are measurement tools observers? 2) How did the universe function before observers existed?. Unfortunately the interviewee here did not give a satisfactory response to these questions and instead continued the thread of mystery around this subject. Let's set the record straight here.. observation requires that the particles interact physically with a detector. Consciousness is not required for this interaction to take place. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD CAN WE PLEASE STOP DESCRIBING OBSERVERS AS CONSCIOUS AGENTS!?!?! Thanks for listening :)
The sentence of your post is very tricky. There are many "observers" who are just bystanders! This question is the most fundamental for the essence of most "spiritual teachings" which are distorted by many "spiritual experts" who need followers really! AWARENESS! That's why the ancient moto is always valid: "Know Thyself!" Nobody can do it without "conscious efforts" which require "work on oneself"!
My friend, I understand your frustration, but current science really doesn't understand this "Mystery" because they are using incorrect fundamentals. Calm down! The truth is that we are an active part of this world, but we are not creators. - If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend you my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
@@Orion15-b9j maybe you can give me the cliff notes regarding the observer problem. "Anyone who claims to understand quantum theory is either lying or crazy" Richard Feynman
@@brandonvalero7315 Richard Feynman is smart, but a corrupted-minded person and he is not an etalon for correctness. He is not the final limit of human intelligence! If he doesn't understand something He cannot order others to discover it!
Interaction Theory Those who cite the Interaction Theory to belittle the role of Consciousness forgot a basic foundation in the Double Slit Experiment. If the test particle passes thru the slit with interactor detector = then congratulations. They are correct. Interaction is the cause of the collapse of the wave function. But how about the other slit where there is no interactor detector? How can Zero Interaction have any meaning at all, and collapse the wave function, unless a Conscious Mind, reasoning out with logic, creates meaning, or imbues Zero Interaction with meaning, resulting to spooky collapse of the wave function despite Zero Interaction?
H’mmmmm!? When observing the tree! Where are you observing the tree? At what point do you observe the tree? How does the Quantum of The Tree disassemble...move through Time/Space and Reassemble “Perfectly” for it be to be Observed again as a Tree...The Tree? And is it the same tree that was over there and is supposedly here...in the Observers 11 Dimension reassembly observatory!?.... My point “When/Where does the Observer Observe The Tree!? We still then have some way to go, getting there in Our Comprehension Of Observer... Science 1 point- Universe 9 Points!?
I can add - if the observer creates reality, where the observer is situated, in reality, or in imagination? and is the observer also an imagination? - If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend you my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
je res mogoce,da molekole vplivajo na mozgane,da so bolj intiligentli?? jaz bi rekla tako..na to vpliva vesolje..njena energija, in ce se povezete s temi molekolami oziroma atomi,ste res bolj intiligentni..se pravi zaceti morate obcutiti vse to..
BTW gravity is a theory not a law . And I want to take this opportunity to give a shout out to my Book Club . Best fucking organization in the world . We got a King , and its free . #feedtheearth #SUPPLIES
We r still thinking anthrothropically... It makes sense....all of it exists with the beauty and ugli ess ormwhateber... Solar system exists... We just came up on a planet....all else moves as some....luck..unlucky....movin objcts with eyes formed here...somewhere else something else formd
@@TheFos88 well don't poop on the sun. There are 11 solar solar seasons and it take 11 day for the black hole in the center of the Milky Way to rotate once. I'm a Jewish sufi mystic. I was born March 11th in Bethlehem. 11.11.2015. Morning, Honolulu, on Nimitz hgwy. I woke up that morning and God spoke to my right ear from above. He said, you are Rain. I walked out to the balcony and stretched my arms to the sky and said, It's time for a rainbow. Immediately a double Rainbow appeared beside the building and reached out to the Pacific Ocean. A neighbor woman asked me how did you do that. I told her I am not a solo act. God is not a solo act. No one is a solo act. I was very astounded. P.S. I used to mock people who believed in God.
I have Absolute theory of everything which mightily explains each and everything as it! universe, science, philosophy, history, symbology, current situation, international politics, Future predictions, technological revolution, industrial revolution, Quantum computer, endof history and end of time that's why I thought to contact you aware everyone
*"I have Absolute theory of everything"* I may be pre-empting this, but does go something like "God did it"? In which case I've heard it from countless others before you.
@@johnyharris As everyone knows that Quantum physics firstly talks about Observer or Consciousness. Nothing can exist until it observes. What do think what is Consciousness?
Y so much separations in and of FEELINGS. -- Mindfulness . Seconds / Meditations . Breaths / Psychic Abilities . How connect ///// isn't observance the UNIFIED FIELD within these
He show up honestly he Not knows quanta mechanic though conscieness. First conscieness inferred reality are limited by brains funcions. Meanwhile reality are unpredicted left behind true phisc picuret it.
I would argue that a reality from consciousness could be derived from small brains if enough of them (say in a flock) report back enough environmental data, so the environment is the limit more than the brain functions. Our type of consciousness is tied to stepping out of context, which might not part of a brain function but starting from imitating birds flock in the head with sense data and having fingers to make it real, which is the going out of context part when combined with a group of people also trying to make this extended cultural consciousness like herds, packs and flocks do. What the humans groups are trying to embody is reflected in the architecture of what is built and tends to make for a simplified environment.
The environment you're conducting this interview on is so calm and full of life. Reminds me of the place i used to live in.
That's the Banff FQXi.
Probably at UCSC. Lovely up there...
The only thing it proves is that Many Worlds apart of being Postmodernistic metaphysical nonsense and being unable to explain how branching occurs doesn't really get you rid of observers.
Maybe it's gravity (as Sir Roger Penrose proposes) maybe it's Von Neumanns Counsciosness but something HAVE to collapse superpositions or you get Flat Earther nonsense!(world eternally frozen in superpositions)
Both questions I hoped would be asked-that I've never seen asked before-were asked. And, when one wasn't quite answered, it was followed up on. EXCELLENT work, great interview, and most of all, thank you for exploring this topic with the seriousness it deserves!!!
Pioneering physicist Sir James Jeans wrote: “The stream of knowledge is heading toward a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter, we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter. Get over it, and accept the inarguable conclusion. The universe is immaterial-mental and spiritual.”
Wow I love this
The Universe is not immaterial. The is matter and energy. Dongshen. Your hands are empty.
@@jacovawernett3077 who are u "God"?
The universe is not a though. The term universe means existence everywhere meaning it is the power of reality.
@@chetanpatil1654 No, The Lasts words God spoke to my right ear from Heaven were " You are Princess Messenger of God." I spoke to a priest I never met. We spoke about a few things God said to my ear. We spoke about Jacob and Joseph and the well and Ladder. He said, he was a little jealous. When I was leaving Immediately got a text on my phone from Wells Farg to reset the security code for the account of Sarah Malachai. Whose name means Princess Messenger of God. I called the bank. They were stumped. God too has a sense of humor. I'm certainly proof of that. His first words to my right ear from Heaven was 8.4.2015. Beside a burning spider web that did not burn. I never saw anything like that. It was morning. I had read some of the newspaper, was drinking Chai tea and ready to do the crossword puzzle. I was astounded.
Any kind of measurement involves things that are part of the universe and these always interact, interfere with it or whatever, I don't think we have a super clear demonstration of how the consciousness determines the clump pattern instead of the interference pattern. But these experiments may potentially help us better understand consciousness or if we understood consciousness by other means we could better understand this experiment and ultimately more about quantum world.
Yes, this is the biggest mystery which understanding will bring a correct understanding of our World. This mystery is explained in my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"
It seems almost as if there’s something going on that we have no idea about but which gives results that just look like what we see - but aren’t.
Yes, it is a big mystery and has no current scientific explanation. If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend you my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
@@Orion15-b9j Thanks
The observer gives the world the power to come into being, through the very act of giving meaning to that world; in brief, No consciousness; no communicating community to establish meaning? Then no world!" - Physicist John Wheeler
The Cosmos is the power to be. I use the term be rather than being because be represents a continuous tense. The observer measures a portion of the world and it is that instance of the world that they interact with.
Interesting what you said about "be". 🤔
the observer and the observed define each other, they coexist. ie "mutually dependent arising" / "dependent origination"
"A delayed choice quantum eraser experiment, first performed by Yoon-Ho Kim, R. Yu, S.P. Kulik, Y.H. Shih and Marlan O. Scully, and reported in early 1999, is an elaboration on the quantum eraser experiment that incorporates concepts considered in Wheeler's delayed choice experiment. The experiment was designed to investigate peculiar consequences of the well-known double slit experiment in quantum mechanics as well as the consequences of quantum entanglement.
The experiment supports the observer effect in quantum measurements.
…
"Further studies have shown that even observing the results after the experiment leads to collapsing the wave function and loading a back-history as shown by delayed choice quantum eraser."
Basically, what causes the collapse is knowledge. And knowledge requires a knower.
"The observer plays a key role in deciding the outcome of the quantum measurments - the answers, and the nature of reality, depend, in part on the questions asked."
That cause problems because then science cannot do experiments about the nature of reality without biasing their results. With retrocausality means the history of the Cosmos is being backfilled based on what happens in the future.
Knowledge doesnt cause the collapse the measurement, particle and wave interference causes decoherence or what you call "collapse". Dont fall into the pit of pseudoscience and new age spirituality.
Fantastic. I think that’s as good as a layperson discussion of the QM observer as I’ve seen.
The problem with his example of the planet not being a planet without an observer, but instead just a big bunch of atoms, starts to fall apart when you include tha fact that there will bo no wavefunction collapse without the observer. Without a collapse, the only thing that exists are particles existing as possibilities without being in a knowable location.
The only thing that makes sense is that there is another level below the Quantum level that existed before the Big Bang and that whatever else may be true of that level, what must be true is it is fundamentally conscious in some incomprehensible way. Until we are willing to acknowledge that possibility, and start searching for it, nothing will ever make sense.
John Archibald Wheeler said: "It begins to look as if we ourselves, by a last minute decision, have an influence on what a photon will do when it has already accomplished most of its doing...we have to say that we ourselves have an undeniable part in shaping what we have always called the past. The past is not really the past until it has been registered. Or put it another way, the past has no meaning or existence unless it exists as a record in the present."
A conscious choice affects the behavior of previously measured, but unobserved particles.
Physicist Asher Peres, who elaborated the experimental results with his delayed choice for entanglement swapping, says:
"If we attempt to attribute an objective meaning to the quantum state of a single system, curious paradoxes appear: quantum effects mimic not only instantaneous action-at-a-distance but also, as seen here, influence future actions on past events, even after these events have been irrevocably recorded."
Our choice affects how the particle acted in the past. The factor of time has nothing to do with quantum mechanics. This was predicted by quantum mechanics and the exact same result is what we see when we put it to experimental test.
Are choice does not affect how particles behave. What is happening is we are a quantum object as well and are described by quantum physics. It is easier to describe humans as a classical object because we can ignore quantum effects in everyday cases.
What is really happening is we get entangled with the particle when we measure it. Now we are sharing information with the particle.
We were not entangled with the Cosmos throughout all of time so we had no effect on the earlier moments. The past was created by other particles acting as an observer.
When quantum events are observed it means that particular possiblities are observed and others ruled out by the observation. Every system that is observed is observed in a certain state, which means other states are ruled out by making the observation. I don't see the problem, or that it brings in anything woo woo. The thing is, when we try to understand, we end up committing ourselves to a theory
Is Aguirre leaving the door open to the possibility that our large, wet, warm squishy brains give rise to a consciousness that acts as the observer which collapses the wave functions that allows us to observe the macro world we know via our first experience? I'm aware of what a gross oversimplification this description is but this seems to be what he is suggesting. Is he saying there is a whirling, buzzing reality of the quantum scale realities which remain in a set of superpositions that we instantiate in terms of what we can understand or appreciate by the psychological act of personal observation via our senses? It seems that our human experiences may be as if we were on the froth of reality of which the fundamental realities are much more different and basic and exist at many layers "below." We are dealing the idea of the world rather than the ontological reality of the world.
Max Tegmark suggests that the impact of a single photon is sufficient to initiate "collapse of the wave function". A self aware "observer" is not necessary.
everything is nothing and nothing is everything till something puts a label on it then it becomes something!🤫
Excellent Robert ... learnt a lot from this one thanks...
You may have already come across the three publications of Robert Lanza explaining the Physics and the logical mechanics OF HOW, and also explaining the WHY of their being something rather then nothing: the necessity of conscious observers inorder for EXISTENCE ???
Excellent.... thanks 🙏
Wonderful and mind-boggling
The fact of an inner observer experiencing its sensation means experience orders motion. Motion may only be ordered from a fixed vantage point. You're it, a continuity of identity, where the fact of your continuity is the only thing which could bring order to experience. Run with that ball to get somewhere. Otherwise, be perplexed by one's own confusion of terms.
Life and the observer, through the act of observation, transforms the superposition of probabilities of all things into a definite concrete state. (Lanza’s Biocentric Universe)
The entire Universe itself since the Big Bang was just a superposition until life emerged on Earth 3 billion years ago to observe it.
But query. Is not “life and the observer” itself also a superposition of probability in a quantum state? So how did it come into existence in the first place?
A story for another day.
(just my thoughts)
Now I finally get why in Eastern philosophy the observer and the observed are one in the same
How could they know without millennia of human studying, right? Simply amazing. I think people in the west are a tad slow.
A fundamental conclusion of the new physics also acknowledges that the observer creates the reality. AS observers, we are personally involved with the creation of our own reality. Physicists are being forced to admit that the universe is a "mental" construction. - R.C. Henry, Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Johns Hopkins University , “The Mental Universe” ; (Nature 436:29,2005)
Observers do not create their own reality. Reality was already their observers are entangled with reality in a way that both influence each other.
Actually, the Universe existed long before us and will be here long after us. We are not creating anything! This is a big "Mystery" because current science is bound to incorrect fundamentals. If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend you my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
@@Orion15-b9j You actually missed the point that Anthony was trying to make at the end. How do you know that the universe existed the way it is before sentient life? The universe existed, for sure, but it might existed in superpositions, or in the form of particles. What we see and perceive as planets or matter could've taken form when the first sentient life started to exist, or , we might actually be the only ones peceiving it this way. And yea, we can aproximate how the universe looked billions of years ago, but, we might perceive it that way, because that its how we can perceive it, or we can just collapse the wave function and get that "image"....or...how do we know that there werent sentient beings on a random planet even then? There are too many unknowns...everything is possible, and tbh, right now, objectively.....everything points to a conscious observer having an effect.Secientist trying to twist this fact and run from this truth, will impair their own advancement in explaining things. The scientific comunity should not dismiss this just because they dont like it..that is a dogmatic and :"religious:" attitude.They should take this pathway and explore it as much as they can.Ofc, if it really proves to be wrong, then dismiss it, but as long as its as possible as the other pathways, right now, maybe even more possible, they should take it into account a bit more.
The existence of sentient observers appear to create a multi deminsional reality that wouldn't exist without them.
How so? Can you elaborate what you mean?
@@cyberiadiscordia389
Read "The Cosmic Landscape" by Leonard Susskind he does a great job of explaining such things.
energy interactions exchange information for observation?
I feel there's a similar dichotomy between quantum and classical physics, as exists between the materialist view of consciousness and, well, lots of other theories. Where does the observer effect fit in with the materialist view of consciousness? It really seems like there are at least two view of consciousness that are very well served by science, yet seem incompatible.
Does the balance of our ecosystem have an effect on the future as much as bringing into existence what we focus on and could it be a combination?
"A delayed choice quantum eraser experiment, first performed by Yoon-Ho Kim, R. Yu, S.P. Kulik, Y.H. Shih and Marlan O. Scully, and reported in early 1999, is an elaboration on the quantum eraser experiment that incorporates concepts considered in Wheeler's delayed choice experiment. The experiment was designed to investigate peculiar consequences of the well-known double slit experiment in quantum mechanics as well as the consequences of quantum entanglement.
The experiment supports the observer effect in quantum measurements.
Wow, it's so interesting, all these questions and thoughts about the nature of reality. Weird to think that when I'm dead, it will be as if nothing ever existed at all.
indeed , if all the point of views would disappear then is like reality never existed . IF ...
Happens every time we cycle into deep sleep.
That's the bible's viewpoint about death as well...
Dearh cancels one out of existence, period.
To think is an abstract construct from the mind of an intelligence.
And intelligence ... has free will ... to make abstract & physical constructs.
Man is the only known intelligence in the Universe ... who has free will ... and a body & mind ... to make abstract & physical constructs.
Only an intelligence ... makes Laws ( of Nature) and things ( of the Universe) with clear purpose, properties, form, design & function.
Anything ... that has clear purpose, form, design, function ... and ... obeys a set of Laws ... ORIGINATE ... from the MIND of an intelligence.
The mind of an animal which has consciousness is only physical( brain).
The mind of Man is physical (brain) & non-physical( soul).
The mind of the intelligence ... that made the Universe & Man ... is Spirit & very much "Almighty."
@@abelincoln8885 i like how you present this profound but very simple truth...
Atheists are living in denial, in spite of the evidence...
But, one adjustment i'd like you to consider in ur submission is that the brain is not different from the sole. The brain is a part of the sole simce it is a part of the physiology of the body. The mind, however is an abstract concept to describe the instrument or function of the brain to process information for humans.
The mind makes humans what it is. The mind is like a software on the brain to activate free will.
I have authorities from God's word...
Why do people cling to the belief in a mind-independent reality? It is surely because if there is no such reality, then ultimately (as far as we can know) mind alone exists. And if mind is not a product of real matter, but rather is the creator of the illusion of material reality (which has, in fact, despite the materialists, been known to be the case, since the discovery of quantum mechanics in 1925), then a theistic view of our existence becomes the only rational alternative to solipsism."
～ Richard Conn Henry is an Academy Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Johns Hopkins University, author of one book and over 200 publications on the topics of astrophysics and various forms of astronomy.
Mind as far as we know, cant exist without the brain. So no that easily discounted your claims. Our experience is illusory, but still it is concrete at our scale. There is a reason we arent passing through walls etc etc. Physics still applies, biology, neurology too. Dont get ahead of yourself and start spreading new age spiritual pseudoscience.
@@albert6157 new age? Listen here pal! I'm gonna poop on the floor and poop on the roof, I'm gonna poop till I can't poop no more!
Can gravity waves be detected from classic mechanics, such as people, down to quantum mechanics? Are gravity waves occuring when current measurements of quantum mechanics are made?
What are measurement devices doing that effects subatomic / quantum mechanics? Do the measurement devices send out a subatomic / quantum signal, or have parts that detect quantum signals? Could mass of measurement device send out gravity waves that effects subatomic / quantum mechanics? In which case are people constantly effecting quantum mechanics through gravity waves from their mass?
Many thousands of clever experiments have been performed in the last one hundred years and the conclusion is that - "Conscious knowledge of the observer is collapsing wave functions of particles" This is the great current mystery in science. If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend you my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
To qualify as an observer, a structure must first be able to sense and interpret(preserve/save) a change in that particular dimension (physical environment)...
How do you explain premonitions that come true if we create what we focus on? Is it a combination or is what we focus on a type of premonition
Those “premonitions” are in fact an illusion, they just give you an hint about everything being written beforehand. How could some things be written and not all the others anyway?
Observation, in my opinion, is not necessarily linear. One observer may observe events in the past or in the future.
What's the process of,When observer becomes observant and how is the information transform from one to the next and how long it takes?
Everybody is an observer. The quantum information is traveling in an instant regardless of distance - (entangled particles). The conscious knowledge is collapsing the wave functions of particles and for the current science, this is the great mystery of all time. If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend you my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
@@Orion15-b9j be for i rush to your book..i just wana ask few question if i may so
Can a blind man/woman observes in the same way normal people do?
What do you mean when you say everybody is an observer?
What is there to be observed and whats not?
Is there anything that can't be observed?
Is science the real method of understanding of the mystery of life or is there something else?
I'm not a scientist nor a religious person.
@@kamabanjo1118 Science is the way of understanding things as long as the things that we want to understand are in the scope of the scientific method. The scientific method is bound by our level of understanding and perceiving the world. For us to understand more than what our level allows us to, we must evolve. I see 3 or 4 pathways of evolution: 1- biological, 2-technological, 3-mental and 4-spiritual (some might put spiritual and mental in the same category, because for them consciousness encompansses both). Life forms initially start to evolve biological(actually, they allways kinda of continue to do so, but its much slower after a certain point in the evolution is reached). After that, they start to use the material world and everything that they can perceive in order to create technology.The respective specie will evolve technological to a point, when technology isnt enough anymore, because every way of using the material world that exists in that corner of the universe was used, and the planet was kinda destroyed...so the next step is evolving mentally. This means...that the entire race must come to the conclussion that greed causes hate which causes destruction....so political systems must be changed in order for the individuals of the specie to start and understand each other. After that point is achieved, the next step is evolving spiritually. Technological advancements like automation will start to create a self sustaining enviroment (if used wisely of course), so people wont bother with small tasks anymore, but work on knowing THE SELF more, and generally be more happy. If observers really have the ability of collapsing the wave function, then this really implies that our thoughts can shape the world in some form pr to some extent, because we are literally creating and perceive thoughts just like we perceive the world(and created it in some form), which means that a specie that has thoughts full of love,compassion and beatuy would affect the enviroment at the planetary scale or even more, who knows.Ofc, everything I say can be just stupid, but....we dont really know how observers work yet, and we didnt have a world like this yet. Frequencies and vibrations play a role in this whole story, that one is clear...so if we all vibrate the same and in a positive way, we might evolve? Who knows...but even if I am totally wrong about this....something of this kind would not be bad for the human specie in any way or form....so if I am wrong..everything applies until the mental level heh
Do humans have the ability to think,imagine or create anything out of nothing?
@@kamabanjo1118 From 'Nothing" even "God" cannot build anything! The Universe is built on the base of opposing symmetry, (as + and - ) but even "God" is using space for this purpose. Unfortunately, fewer and fewer people are able to think or create something
There seems to be something that eliminates the duality between observer and object. Is that reality?
This video got me thinking ... try to imagine all the particles that make up your body ... then imagine one of those particles could "see" the universe, the way you as a person can see it, but now at the scale of a sub-atomic particle. There's vast distances between an atom's nucleus and it's electrons ... just like there's vast distances between the Earth and other planets, the Sun and other stars etc. This whole thing about observers seems to be to be a matter of scale.
How can we understand the world of particles? the world of any existing organisms, the macro, micro world? the cosmic world, the infinite universe?
We have to dive in, like we're doing in our milky way, we have to imagine ourselves as a particle, not with the influenced mind of a human, but through observing and understanding the constructive function of these particles world, then we can imitate, computerize, and use all informations, and maybe find out why the wave function collapses.
If I can't imagine myself in your world, I will never really understand you.
I tend to pretend I'm a particle a lot. It's great.
@@jakecostanza802 ha ha ha you're kidding, but I mean, with the informations we've got, we can imagine a simulation; for example a ball, you are a ball in a dead-end street surrounded by high buildings, you want to get out, so you start bouncing until you reach a flat roof, and from there on you bounce your way to what your purpose was.
It's just the ability to imagine yourself in anything you want to, and that way understand other worlds and existences.
Is quantum mechanics affected by gravity, such as when measured by machine / device?
An observer is one who observes thyself,surroundings, essence of HUMANITY kindness compassion and "EXISTENCE of thyself and " something beyond " and may understand mathematics and science interactions but keep them at bay by the way. Thanks for the topic.
Maybe transition from quantum mechanics to classic mechanics when there is enough gravity; and back to quantum mechanics when there is not enough gravity?
How could gravity, time and quantum system interact?
Physiology of the Spiritual (Quick Guide)
-The pleasurable “chills” or “goosebumps” (aka frisson) experienced when listening to music, watching movies, viewing art, dancing etc. is a sensation that is sustainable for long periods and increases in intensity with dedication. It is the sensation needed to enter altered states of consciousness known as the Jhanas as well as to self-induce out of body experiences from a meditative state (visualization techniques are also required for OBEs).
-If you pursue this sensation within yourself by attempting to feel it as much as possible (all day, every day if you are able), it builds in strength significantly over time to the point where it becomes a full body sensation with the pinnacle being at the crown of the skull. You must become your own experiment as each individual’s set of beliefs and emotional reactions are unique.
-One fundamental key to the sensation is to achieve states of genuine, positive emotions such as love, gratitude, inspiration, courage, joy, unity etc. Therefore, anything that enables you to feel these emotions will work. Conversely, anything that prevents these, will prevent your sensation. Control of thought is the key.
-It is important to take a non-judgmental perspective of all things, including yourself, in order to cultivate acceptance and love within yourself. Try to be honest with yourself at all times. Trust your feelings and intuitions.
-Be patient and be understanding of yourself if you think you are struggling. This is a progression and it will take some time to strengthen, especially while first beginning to induce in meditation, as your brain reforms its pathways via neuroplasticity (weeks to many months depending on effort). Love yourself unconditionally for the greatest success.
-Your sensation will inevitably grow in strength with persistence and you will begin to feel it more easily to a broader range of stimuli. You will eventually realize it is not the stimuli at all, but only your emotional state and control of your mind/thoughts that matter.
-It is this same sensation that monks attempt to achieve during meditation and chanting. The chants or mantras are to create vibrations in the chest which can help stimulate the sensation as well as to keep one’s focus single pointed.
-It is the same sensation that “spirit runners” or indigenous long-distance runners attempt to achieve. Also called “runner’s high” in the west.
-The current scientific term for the sensation is “Frisson” and it remains relatively unexplained in the public sector being reduced simply to a release of endorphins.
-Other names include: Chakra Energy, Kundalini, Prana, Mana, Qi, Chi, Holy Spirit, life force, vibration among others depending on your cultural lens.
-In the CIA analysis of the Gateway Process for consciousness it is described as “a self-stimulation of the pleasure centers in the brain caused by the circulation of a ‘current’ along the sensory cortex.” www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001700210016-5.pdf
-Remember this sensation is sustainable and will increase in intensity. Much love.
So we’ll written. Grateful for this crystallized depth & reminder.
Nope.
Only an intelligence ... makes Laws ( of Nature) and things ( of the Universe) with clear purpose, properties, form, design & function.
Man has known for thousands of years ... that the Universe & Life ... have an UNNATURAL or supernatural origin by an very very powerful intelligence.
Religions are a natural phenomena and will always be observed because Man knows that only an intelligence makes Laws & things with purpose, design & function.
Either all of the religions are wrong about the "supernatural" intelligence that made everything ... or ... there is one religion that is correct.
The four major religions in the world today are:
1. Christianity ( a denomination of Judaism)
2. Islam ( pagan cult with corrupted teachings from Christianity)
3. Hinduism.
4. Atheism ( replaced "the gods" with theories/ideologies of "the man."
Are all four of these religion wrong about the origin of the Universe & Life ... or is there one that has clearly identified the "Almighty" intelligence that made everything and clearly explains why?
Is there one religion that that has greatly benefited the Human Race when its teachings & Laws are followed, ... and would result in complete chaos, disorder or the extinction of the Human Race if it never existed?
There's a reason why the greatest & most influential Man in all of history ... is a Jew ... who said he is the promised Jewish Messiah and the Son of God ... sent by His Father ... to be a sin sacrifice to save the eternal Souls of anybody who believes ... from God's just nature to punish anybody who breaks THE LAW.
Again. Only an intelligence .... makes LAW ... for an intelligence .. to think & behave in an "ideal" or good way ... and is enforced by the LAW maker otherwise there will be chaos, disorder and dire consequences.
God created Man with a body & soul ... with free will and able to make abstract & physical constructs.
Man was created perfect & was to live forever with God ... but only if he obeyed a simple Law. Man was warned by God that if he ate from the tree of knowledge he will die.
The Universe we have today with the fixed Laws of Nature & increasing entropy ... began the moment Man( Adam & Eve) broke God's Law.
God must enforce the Law and punish anybody who breaks his Laws( sin) but God Loves is sinful creation so much and doesn't want any to perish ... so he devised a means to save any who do break His Laws ... by simply believing in a Messiah(Savior) as a sin sacrifice. Only God could be a sin sacrifice that will satisfy a just God who must punish anybody who sins( breaks God's Laws).
Everything makes sense ... when everything in the Universe ( matter/energy and Man) must obey a set of Laws ... that only come from an intelligence.
Matter & energy must obey the Laws of Nature otherwise there will be chaos & disorder.
Man must enforce the Laws he makes for Man ... otherwise there will be chaos & disorder.
God must enforce the Laws he made for Man ... otherwise there will be chaos & disorder.
Jesus name is Yeshua ... which means Salvation.
For God so loved the world, that he sent his only begotten Son, so that they would not perish but have everlasting life.
Again. Religions are a natural phenomena. Either all religions are wrong ... or ... there is only One that is obviously correct, and the Human Race would be screwed, without.
What if all observations are self observations and global with a capital g?
To observe for a human means to have a subjective experience. Observation is all about consciousness and has nothing to do with the world. We do not experience the world. We experience our experiences and where they exist is unknown.
The true multiverse, the multi-observer-verse.
agree
This man is giving a nearly perfect description, in western science terms, of the essence of Vedanta. Distinguishing seer and seen becomes the sole purpose of human existence. Indeed, all existence. And Vedic seers projected a day when pure objectivity, now known as western science, and pure subjectivity, a state of yoga, become one.
Projected? Do you mean our lifes are already written?
Yep. And Heidegger hit upon this in Being & Time as well.
So is the interaction with the machine that affect the object not the observer
No, even when the machine is on, but nobody looking into the screen to see the results, the particles are waves, until a conscious observer starts looking at the screen. If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend you my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
Interaction Theory:
Those who cite the Interaction Theory to belittle the role of Consciousness forgot a basic foundation in the Double Slit Experiment. If the test particle passes thru the slit with interactor detector = then congratulations. They are correct. Interaction is the cause of the collapse of the wave function. But how about the other slit where there is no interactor detector? How can Zero Interaction have any meaning at all, and collapse the wave function, unless a Conscious Mind, reasoning out with logic, creates meaning, or imbues Zero Interaction with meaning, resulting to spooky collapse of the wave function despite Zero Interaction?
A simple view of quantum mechanics is to say that everything has an Uncertainty Principle. For microscopic objects this is a wavelike principle based upon the properties of the synthesis of an entity from a bundle of pilot waves. For macroscopic objects it is a particle-like principle based upon classical Brownian motion on the same scale. The boundary between the two scales is normally likely to be round about the Planck mass, except for the rare case of a chain reaction such as the detonation of nitrogen tri-iodide by an alpha particle.
There will be a destruction of unitarity in the interaction between classical Brownian motion and the wave function. At the microscopic level, unitarity is destroyed by the triple nonlinear interaction between the wave function, the electromagnetic field and tachyonic Brownian motion. TBM is otherwise orthogonal to the wave function.
It's all being imagined its a dream world.
Who's dream?
@@johnyharris yo mama
The conciousness it appears in Is the underlying reality and cannot be objectified- you
I'm glad that the word “you” means so much.
I cannot argue against your logical view. Everything is exactly as you are describing. My argument is only if there is a simple explanation of the mystery of particle superposition and the act of conscious observation. If there is an explanation, then this is changing everything and we have to re-consider how the Universe works. Right or wrong, I am trying to provide this explanation. I will be more than happy if somebody proves me wrong by facts, logic, and the Law of Physics, but I cannot agree with baseless rejection.
I'll pretend to agree with you, then.
Wow. Its STEREO!
The age old Zen question: if a tree falls, but no one heard or saw it falling, did it really fall?
@@marionow6227 if you have ears to hear, you’ll hear the tree fall. If you have eyes, you’ll see the tree fall.
Not a single mention of double split experiment.
Is it the work of physicists to "prove what exists"?
Existence is an ontological assertion. Is measurement an ontological interaction? Whether it's the human eye or a glass lens or a scale, does it matter what a thing is for the interaction to register?
For a scale it doesn't matter if it's an elephant or a car for the measurement to be 5000 pounds. Similarly for an eye or a lens, it doesn't matter if it's a car or an elephant as long as it's in focus, it records or registers.
For a "subatomic particle", whether it's an electron or muon or positron, the measurement is about the thing. It's not just registering position or velocity, it's telling you there is an "electron" there or the "electron" is moving. The interpretation of the measurement includes an ontological assumption about what you're measuring. Matter without space and time, extension and duration, is...what?
A scale just tells you weight, it doesn't tell you what you're weighing. It's assumed you know what you're weighing. The apparati that measure the position and velocity of "subatomic particles" do they also tell you what the particles are? Or is that also assumed?
What is velocity or position without the "thing that moves" or the "thing at rest"? Measurement is not a proof of existence is it?
Don't be so harsh to the scientists. They are confused and really have no answer to this mystery because they are restricted by the wrong fundamentals of the "Standard Model" If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
Science does not prove what exists they explain what exists. There is no way to prove wha exists or what is real on can only state what is not real or what does not exists. That is why what’s the origin of the Cosmos question cannot be answered.
It's not about observers. The observer could be a dead body. The effect comes when a measurement is instantly recorded on the holographic surface of the universe.
Those who cite the Interaction Theory to belittle the role of Consciousness forgot a basic foundation in the Double Slit Experiment. If the test particle passes thru the slit with interactor detector = then congratulations. They are correct. Interaction is the cause of the collapse of the wave function. But how about the other slit where there is no interactor detector? How can Zero Interaction have any meaning at all, and collapse the wave function, unless a Conscious Mind, reasoning out with logic, creates meaning, or imbues Zero Interaction with meaning, resulting to spooky collapse of the wave function despite Zero Interaction?
Can gravity be an observer of quantum system?
Quantum world + Observer = Classical world
Quantum waves/particles + interactions and interference = Classical world
Does a creator God count as an Observer? Or do observers simply see the effects of the creator? Or can God be both creator and observer prior to humanities creation?
The observer is also a quantum system and what is taking place are two quantum systems interacting
Cosmic Consciousness exists before humans existed .
Consciousness that drives everything into place especially the evolution of plants and animals .
A perfect example would be evolution of mimicry .
A plant that looks like an animal or insect .
An insect or animal that looks like a plant ..
The consciousness~ soul is like water. The water in my dispenser (is like a soul) will eventually go back to the ocean (which is like the immortal Spirit). There is only one Collective consciousness (Collective Spirit) in the universe similar to only one Collective water in the vast ocean of space (or universe).
Reference:
Water has Memory by Jacques Benveniste and Luc Montagnier experiments.
@@dongshengdi773 pseudoscience in a nutshell
Like a helpless victim being battened upon by some vampire, if sense data is energy driven. To see it is to drink its blood.
@@albert6157 my eyes....creATE...REALITY!!!!!
@@albert6157 eyeball power is amazing. Eyeballs make existence real. Eyeballs can collapse a function from unreality to reality.
Biological entities only.. LIFE inherits (disociates Bernardo Kastrup)Conciousness to observe itself
Particles Superposition and the mystery of "Measurement" is the biggest mystery in science. It is explained in my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"
We need Bernardo Kastrup on this channel !!
If there is a god, it could be the ultimate Observer???
… or are there more observers after all? Suspense music comes in. Hearts start bumping. Expectant silence. Voice-off appears in a cheerful manner: “we can relax everyone, our religious beliefs have been confirmed, it's what we always thought it was. How reassuring can that be, being right all along? I think we did a great job. Round of applause to all of us”. The end… Or is it?
observation of information?
I have noticed that most of the thieves believe that they own what they have stolen! not only that: they use thievery as patching techniques and irrationality itself is what attracts them to each other, lucky.....
Powers
There is no objective world everything IS subjective. Quantum physics has been telling us that our world is not mechanical and non-physical for a hundred years now. Everything exists as computed probability until an observer observes it. Things you cannot directly observe like quantum particles don't exist as actual particles until information is available describing that particle through a measuring apparatus for a observer to observe.
Aatmiya DIVINITY
HARE KRSNA
Experiencing happiness observing this interview "What Are OBSERVERS?
Observers are Consciousness able to Observing Objects of Experience and becoming AWARE there feel 😊-😂-❤-😮
Observer is a part *OF" Universe and therefore Observer is *IN* Universe.😅😅😅😅😅
a better question is why are you in the middle of the woods? how did you get there?
This is so fascinating. Makes me wish I had quantum powers to help Ukraine.
Wish I had quantum powers to help Iraq in 2003, Serbia in 1999, Libia in 2011, and the rest of them...
@@dAvrilthebear but you did help Iraq in 1980?
@@dAvrilthebear Yea, and stop Russia for voting to sustain the Libia Operation which gave the UN green light, and help the people who were killed in the streets by Gaddafi forces, the same people who were very gratefull for UN intervention, and stop Sadam Hussein from making genocide after genocide.
The last minute of the video is a perfect example of how stupid this whole "observer" crap is. Yes, atoms and planets (and by extension, their quantum bits) are still there even if people aren't there to observe them.
Its not a "people" thing... Any conscious life form works... (Aliens, etc)
How do you know that? Time traveler perhaps?
That last minute was pure reality. The concept of planet is created by consciousness. That’s a fact. And all of the relations and functions and so forth also are born from consciousness.
Do you think you have some sort of direct link to truth?
I agree. Other planets and moons in our solar system have craters that were created by impacts that happened long before animals existed on Earth. We can even see which impacts happened before others, based on overlapping craters. So things were definitely happening before we were here to think about them.
@@johnskujins8870
Ok but you’re by default denying the wave function collapse interpretation of quantum mechanics. Right?
Because you can’t have it both ways. The observation of the craters technically collapses the probability function of the quantum system. That happens, not prior to observation. That is, according to the prevailing scientific paradigm.
So which alternative theory of particle physics do you tend to favor and how does it deal with this issue?
Man has always known ... the origin of anything that has purpose, form, properties, design & FUNCTION, and Law.
Everything in the Universe has clear purpose, form, design & FUNCTION and obey a set of Laws
The "observer" is a natural phenomena ... because only an intelligence has free will ( mind) to think, believe, say, do ... or observe ... AND make abstract & physical FUNCTIONS with clear purpose, properties, form & design.
Everything in the Universe ... is an abstract ( time, space, Laws) or physical (matter, energy) FUNCTION ... made by an "observer" ... for an "observer."
An elemental particle only "appear" to be everywhere but it is not. All elemental particles are vibrating or moving at or near light speed over subatomic distances.
Throw a vibrating ball ... and its path will be like a "wave function." But it is still just a ball. Nothing less, nothing more.
Observers of exactly what?
what can I say: they built a whole dome of one rotten grain "defective irrational logic". but lately they can build a whole dome of many stolen grains !
lucky apes, it is their own paradise. the apes found a treasure.
Thank you for being so bright, the cosmos needs you.
Perhaps the entire universe existed as sort of a huge Copenhagen Shroedinger's Cat in a Box state of multipotential, until true sentience evolved. Then the entire past collapsed into this state.
Which could mean that =we= are not necessarily a consciousness sufficient to be an observer. That could happen millions or billions of years from now, but to everything in the universe, there is one timeline that results in the evolution of a consciousness sufficient to collapse the wavefunction.
👀plane+time...planet.
Hmmm.. EVERYTHING is possible. Questions, questions.
How many sides to that coin are there?
Why are we living THIS possibility?
Are we living them all?
LOL, Sometimes I want to trade places with me.
❤🙏☯️
This is the single most divisive issue in physics if you ask me. The idea of the "observer" often get's misconstrued as a "conscious observer" which lets woowoo artists like Deepak Chopra fool masses of people into believing he is the arbiter of truth, when in reality he is selling BS so that he can adorn his glasses with diamonds. There is sooo much woowoo around this concept that it does a grave disservice to physics. This needs to get sorted out.
Lawrence asked the right questions here: 1) are measurement tools observers? 2) How did the universe function before observers existed?. Unfortunately the interviewee here did not give a satisfactory response to these questions and instead continued the thread of mystery around this subject. Let's set the record straight here.. observation requires that the particles interact physically with a detector. Consciousness is not required for this interaction to take place. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD CAN WE PLEASE STOP DESCRIBING OBSERVERS AS CONSCIOUS AGENTS!?!?!
Thanks for listening :)
The sentence of your post is very tricky. There are many "observers" who are just bystanders! This question is the most fundamental for the essence of most "spiritual teachings" which are distorted by many "spiritual experts" who need followers really! AWARENESS! That's why the ancient moto is always valid: "Know Thyself!" Nobody can do it without "conscious efforts" which require "work on oneself"!
My friend, I understand your frustration, but current science really doesn't understand this "Mystery" because they are using incorrect fundamentals. Calm down! The truth is that we are an active part of this world, but we are not creators. - If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend you my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
@@Orion15-b9j maybe you can give me the cliff notes regarding the observer problem.
"Anyone who claims to understand quantum theory is either lying or crazy"
Richard Feynman
@@brandonvalero7315 Richard Feynman is smart, but a corrupted-minded person and he is not an etalon for correctness. He is not the final limit of human intelligence! If he doesn't understand something He cannot order others to discover it!
Interaction Theory
Those who cite the Interaction Theory to belittle the role of Consciousness forgot a basic foundation in the Double Slit Experiment. If the test particle passes thru the slit with interactor detector = then congratulations. They are correct. Interaction is the cause of the collapse of the wave function. But how about the other slit where there is no interactor detector? How can Zero Interaction have any meaning at all, and collapse the wave function, unless a Conscious Mind, reasoning out with logic, creates meaning, or imbues Zero Interaction with meaning, resulting to spooky collapse of the wave function despite Zero Interaction?
Whos watching the watch makers.
perhaps we don't know, mind boggling.. might be easy, only thing we don't got it..or nature don't reveal his secrets easy
Whoops... the theory leads to a “singular” em pass.. the “wave particle duality” explains that we’re missing something. It’s as simple as that.
I like when things are “as simple as that”, it makes it easier for us to understand.
everything! unbelievable! say thanks to the revelation of the sky !
HOORAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
H’mmmmm!? When observing the tree! Where are you observing the tree? At what point do you observe the tree? How does the Quantum of The Tree disassemble...move through Time/Space and Reassemble “Perfectly” for it be to be Observed again as a Tree...The Tree? And is it the same tree that was over there and is supposedly here...in the Observers 11 Dimension reassembly observatory!?.... My point “When/Where does the Observer Observe The Tree!? We still then have some way to go, getting there in Our Comprehension Of Observer... Science 1 point- Universe 9 Points!?
I can add - if the observer creates reality, where the observer is situated, in reality, or in imagination? and is the observer also an imagination? - If you are really interested to find the answer to this mystery, I will recommend you my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" where this mystery is explained in easy and plain language.
God is the observer with His spirit in superposition in all of us.
So without perception, there is nothing...
No, observers in quantum physics, are just another word for meaurements, particle interactions (or wave interferrence) and noise.
Just be honest and say: I DONT KNOW, instead of doing a song and dance.
je res mogoce,da molekole vplivajo na mozgane,da so bolj intiligentli?? jaz bi rekla tako..na to vpliva vesolje..njena energija, in ce se povezete s temi molekolami oziroma atomi,ste res bolj intiligentni..se pravi zaceti morate obcutiti vse to..
BTW gravity is a theory not a law .
And I want to take this opportunity to give a shout out to my Book Club .
Best fucking organization in the world .
We got a King , and its free .
#feedtheearth #SUPPLIES
We all observed in way or another 😅😅😅😅
We r still thinking anthrothropically...
It makes sense....all of it exists with the beauty and ugli ess ormwhateber...
Solar system exists...
We just came up on a planet....all else moves as some....luck..unlucky....movin objcts with eyes formed here...somewhere else something else formd
I'm an observer and Messenger from God aka Gott. Entanglement. To see Robert on another string of time. I see
Atoms Adam.
Sol Invictus. I'm gonna poop on the floor and poop on the roof, I'm gonna poop till I can't poop no more
@@TheFos88 well don't poop on the sun. There are 11 solar solar seasons and it take 11 day for the black hole in the center of the Milky Way to rotate once. I'm a Jewish sufi mystic. I was born March 11th in Bethlehem. 11.11.2015. Morning, Honolulu, on Nimitz hgwy. I woke up that morning and God spoke to my right ear from above. He said, you are Rain. I walked out to the balcony and stretched my arms to the sky and said, It's time for a rainbow. Immediately a double Rainbow appeared beside the building and reached out to the Pacific Ocean. A neighbor woman asked me how did you do that. I told her I am not a solo act. God is not a solo act. No one is a solo act. I was very astounded. P.S. I used to mock people who believed in God.
I have Absolute theory of everything which mightily explains each and everything as it! universe, science, philosophy, history, symbology, current situation, international politics, Future predictions, technological revolution, industrial revolution, Quantum computer, endof history and end of time that's why I thought to contact you aware everyone
*"I have Absolute theory of everything"*
I may be pre-empting this, but does go something like "God did it"? In which case I've heard it from countless others before you.
@@johnyharris
As everyone knows that Quantum physics firstly talks about Observer or Consciousness. Nothing can exist until it observes.
What do think what is Consciousness?
@@solophysics4359 I don't know. So is this just another God of the gaps argument? Science hasn't explained something yet therefore God?
its called bias
This video is a classic example of what happens when bad philosophy corrupts physics.
Y so much separations in and of FEELINGS. -- Mindfulness . Seconds / Meditations . Breaths / Psychic Abilities . How connect ///// isn't observance the UNIFIED FIELD within these
Ya know God can become evil and cruel, when you piss him off, wonder why so many people simp for G?
Ain't called the wrath of God for no fucking reason...
If a tree falls in the forest, and nobody is…..
Entanglement == Collapse. So incredibly naïve to think our awareness makes Pluto cohere.
He show up honestly he Not knows quanta mechanic though conscieness. First conscieness inferred reality are limited by brains funcions. Meanwhile reality are unpredicted left behind true phisc picuret it.
I would argue that a reality from consciousness could be derived from small brains if enough of them (say in a flock) report back enough environmental data, so the environment is the limit more than the brain functions. Our type of consciousness is tied to stepping out of context, which might not part of a brain function but starting from imitating birds flock in the head with sense data and having fingers to make it real, which is the going out of context part when combined with a group of people also trying to make this extended cultural consciousness like herds, packs and flocks do. What the humans groups are trying to embody is reflected in the architecture of what is built and tends to make for a simplified environment.
This observer thing is very nonsense