Seminar | Gravity = Thermodynamics | Prof Erik Verlinde

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @jennycoffey1443
    @jennycoffey1443 Рік тому +2

    Fascinating man totally love what he does to my mind !! I am Verlinde hooked.

  • @cody1541
    @cody1541 6 місяців тому

    I ended up here because a thought kept me up at night. I explained my concept to ChatGPT and it told me I was developing an idea that posed gravity as an emergent force.
    I'm glad this is already being explored, because my curiosity was killing me. I didn't get any sleep

    • @YawnGod
      @YawnGod 5 місяців тому

      Pro-tip: Everything is emergent.
      It's a nifty system.

  • @bishwajitbhattacharjee-xm6xp

    Very good lecture. I first time come across space geometry dependent thermodynamics. Those glassy states and its micro structure are the responsible for inertia ? Is gravity dimensionfree ? In the emergent gravity has state of young and mature state to show EINSTEIN Eq. Valid. Vacuum themodynamics in MOND is not second order​ derivatives .
    Thank you this channel.

  • @aniksamiurrahman6365
    @aniksamiurrahman6365 2 роки тому

    Great initiative, IIT Gandhinagar. This type of highly theoretical research is barely present in the Indian Subcontinent.

    • @morgengabe1
      @morgengabe1 Рік тому

      It's barely present in europe abd the us too..,

  • @Achrononmaster
    @Achrononmaster 9 місяців тому

    @12:00 is there not a bootstrapping type of issue here? You can claim m = dS/dx but that does not mean entropy change *_is_* mass, it just means there is a relation near horizons. One might equally say masses are what define entropy (count the particles). After all, entropy really is the derived concept, not the fundamental. The equivalence principle seems more likely, imho, to be simple mass playing a dual role in physics. "Space tells matter how to move, matter tells space how to bend" --- is not just a whimsical Wheelerism, it is quite deep. What I would take from it is that mass _is_ spacetime topology. Then you only need axioms or conjecture (if they can be proven) about how topology alters curvature. But do we not have that already in basic holonomy concepts and the assumption spacetime is smooth asymptotically (so ≫ Planck lengths or so) far from a mass?

  • @lorenzo9934
    @lorenzo9934 2 роки тому

    I wonder if someone has tried to model something like a Warp Drive using his theory or at least something that has the same effect

  • @helicalactual
    @helicalactual 6 місяців тому

    entanglement is geometry is information is gravity is thermodynamics.

  • @JAYMOAP
    @JAYMOAP Рік тому

    Very nice presentation.

  • @solexxx8588
    @solexxx8588 2 роки тому +1

    I think the vacuum is the missing mass and energy in the universe. Calling it dark matter/energy does not seem to define it. Entropy sounds promising.

    • @JAYMOAP
      @JAYMOAP Рік тому

      It's confined momentum without conservation in matter states

    • @jobeyene3342
      @jobeyene3342 23 дні тому

      True !

  • @anywallsocket
    @anywallsocket Рік тому +1

    wtf is wrong w ur slides bro

  • @TheMemesofDestruction
    @TheMemesofDestruction 7 місяців тому

    Fascinating Stuff! Thank You! ^.^

  • @146maxpain
    @146maxpain 2 роки тому

    Fake physics. Erik should stay with "string theory". Thermodynamics is obviously not his craft.

    • @kiran0511
      @kiran0511 2 роки тому +2

      fake why ?

    • @fLaMePr0oF
      @fLaMePr0oF 2 роки тому

      What was your PhD?

    • @146maxpain
      @146maxpain Рік тому +1

      @championchap how can you say that. String theory is dead and everybody knows it. Please stop masking the failure of string theory.