Finding a CDF from a pdf

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лис 2015
  • How to find a cumulative distribution function from a probability density function, examples where there is only one function for the pdf and where there is more than one function of the pdf.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 127

  • @david0aloha
    @david0aloha 5 років тому +30

    I'm trying to brush up on my stats for a course on Bayesian Machine Learning, and this is the clearest example I found. I thought this is how the cumulative distribution function worked, but the other sources I encountered were less approachable for someone who hasn't taken stats in awhile. This used basic integral calculus and confirmed that my intuition was correct. Thanks!

    • @hk254lyt8
      @hk254lyt8 8 місяців тому

      Hey from the future 👋. How is your machine learning journey so far? 😅

    • @david0aloha
      @david0aloha 7 місяців тому

      ​@@hk254lyt8 Hey. It's good! I have been working as a data scientist for a year and a half, and have a modeling pipeline I built for personal projects.

  • @nathandowner6007
    @nathandowner6007 6 років тому +27

    Can't tell you how much I needed this. Many thanks from myself and my grade!

  • @alisatodorova
    @alisatodorova 2 роки тому +15

    This was so simple, concise and clear to understand! Thank you!!

  • @AjayKrews
    @AjayKrews 6 років тому +18

    Crisp, clear and very concise. Thanks mate!

  • @hockey12xtreme
    @hockey12xtreme 3 роки тому +3

    5 years later still helps me greatly thank you!!!

  • @thijinkhanlok2150
    @thijinkhanlok2150 2 роки тому

    Can't tell you how much this one has assisted me, thank you

  • @tuwilikashinana9168
    @tuwilikashinana9168 6 років тому +4

    I really have to watch this like more than 10 times because of the graph, it’s not clear 🙁. But this was all the eplanation I needed. Thank you.

  • @EmilyXieX
    @EmilyXieX 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you. This was a super, super clear explanation.

  • @Shiny_Services
    @Shiny_Services 3 роки тому

    Thank you, bless you Sir. no time wasted straight knowledge straight facts, you're a beast.

  • @rifimochahari770
    @rifimochahari770 Рік тому +1

    Thank you for explaining through these easy examples .

  • @iosifpuha6114
    @iosifpuha6114 10 місяців тому

    you're THE MAN, thanks so much, got theory of information exam in less than two days, you saved me

  • @abdul0500M
    @abdul0500M 7 років тому +20

    Great job explaining. Very clear and to the point. Thank you. The way you write the x tho really bothers me hahah

  • @linjinghe6544
    @linjinghe6544 10 місяців тому

    Thank you for your clear explanation. It's super helpful!

  • @chaewonkim9985
    @chaewonkim9985 6 років тому +2

    Thank you so much, you really saved my life on understanding the concept!

  • @emilieandersen-ranberg510
    @emilieandersen-ranberg510 2 роки тому +2

    I'd also like to thank you for very effective teaching in this video! It's great!
    Just one minor thing that I nevertheless think could increase its quality is if the writing could have been less hard to interpret :) It's a bit like Doctors handwriting ;). I know, there may be technical aspects at play, but still, it's just my well-meaning suggestion.

  • @kelvinmuli1107
    @kelvinmuli1107 6 років тому

    Thanks!! Keep posting more...I will tell my friends of your channel

  • @azadsadiqli
    @azadsadiqli 7 років тому +1

    Help me please, is there any difference between corresponding distribution function and cumulative distribution function?

  • @TheSwordman2
    @TheSwordman2 6 років тому

    Thanks mate.Keep up.You're the man.

  • @owonubijobsunday4764
    @owonubijobsunday4764 6 років тому

    Thanks very much.
    It saved the day.
    Sarcastic part was 8:20, the background looked like a truck was coming.

  • @ritupangogoi7140
    @ritupangogoi7140 3 роки тому

    Many many thanks to you bro .. I need the most... honestly

  • @keepbreathing2659
    @keepbreathing2659 3 місяці тому

    is it okay if we dont subtitute values and just get the function
    for example without substituting the value in second part function we get is 7+2x3/21

  • @danielaperez2842
    @danielaperez2842 4 роки тому

    You're incredible! Thanks you so much!

  • @vanthiya_thevan
    @vanthiya_thevan 6 років тому

    good explanation sir.u have done a great job.

  • @Cozyvlogsus
    @Cozyvlogsus 7 років тому

    Really helpful, thanks!

  • @MrJtsai1
    @MrJtsai1 7 років тому

    Awesome Vid! Much appreciated!

  • @davidgalati5112
    @davidgalati5112 3 роки тому

    Really helpful, thank you a lot!

  • @thilankadissanayake6297
    @thilankadissanayake6297 Рік тому

    Finally I found the best explanation video❤

  • @drfaridonamdjadi7516
    @drfaridonamdjadi7516 4 роки тому +1

    The variable under integration should be something different from x, say 1/4tdt. Very well explained

  • @reemj8382
    @reemj8382 5 років тому

    Great!!!!! Thank you so much for this

  • @ilkerkeklik6122
    @ilkerkeklik6122 8 місяців тому +1

    That was the first question of the midterm of the Modeling and Discrete Simulation course at Marmara University.

  • @davidbalakirev5963
    @davidbalakirev5963 3 роки тому

    Very nice! It really helped me.

  • @HunterD510
    @HunterD510 6 років тому

    Thanks, helped me a ton.

  • @jonathanlindberg1426
    @jonathanlindberg1426 Рік тому

    Incredibly, thank you so much!!

  • @dreambig1564
    @dreambig1564 4 роки тому +1

    greaaat explanation i finally could understand the concept thanks to ur video, please just consider improving the way u write, other than that, just continue adding some of these awesomeee videos. danke schÖn

  • @shhhhhh3945
    @shhhhhh3945 9 місяців тому +1

    Why does x stay the same instead of being multiplied with the xˆ2 inside the bracket and hence becoming xˆ3? Pleaseee anyone answerrrr

  • @DikasLittleWorld
    @DikasLittleWorld 7 років тому

    Thankyou !!!!! It is very helpful

  • @niharikadamani8980
    @niharikadamani8980 7 років тому +9

    Sir, when you are using "x" as a limit how can you integrate the PDF using "dx". Shouldn't you use a dummy variable?

    • @mr.anonymous2507
      @mr.anonymous2507 5 років тому +1

      X is a variable value between 1to3 for finding the probality at any point

    • @Lucas-ns9hd
      @Lucas-ns9hd 3 роки тому

      Yes. Bad form not to.

  • @ekaterinafeldman5394
    @ekaterinafeldman5394 3 роки тому

    Could you please explain why you have X^2 / 2? Is f(x) by definition x^2?

  • @zainsaeed147
    @zainsaeed147 3 роки тому

    why in 1st example the probability is 1 after 3 ..Reason ?? the graph is still touching zero as in case of x less than 1

  • @nimrakhalid7211
    @nimrakhalid7211 6 років тому +1

    if question is P(X+Y>3)..........what should i do?

  • @jacknewall7838
    @jacknewall7838 6 років тому

    Great video. Thanks :)

  • @AJ-et3vf
    @AJ-et3vf 2 роки тому

    great video, thank you!

  • @JamesMwas28
    @JamesMwas28 10 місяців тому +1

    well explained.Thankyou

  • @sinanustuner3974
    @sinanustuner3974 4 роки тому

    Why do you get a probability that is greater than 1? For instance with the second example f(x)= 2/7*(2^2) >1 ... surely it doesn't work?

  • @AmandeepSingh-ur2sn
    @AmandeepSingh-ur2sn 6 років тому +1

    Thnx for explaining...ND no problem with handwriting, Its better than mine

  • @peerapongwattanthaweesin8304

    Good work, my g.

  • @pranaytanniru7764
    @pranaytanniru7764 8 років тому

    awesome video bro thank yu verymuch

  • @thodasikho1242
    @thodasikho1242 2 роки тому

    You are totally amazing

  • @onabill155
    @onabill155 4 роки тому

    You are awesome man

  • @jrtthamasha7306
    @jrtthamasha7306 Рік тому

    Great Explanation😌

  • @thedailyshowwithcomicaldelo
    @thedailyshowwithcomicaldelo 9 місяців тому

    perfect..never found something simpler!

  • @oseidarren3686
    @oseidarren3686 2 роки тому

    great explanation

  • @Tsunade64
    @Tsunade64 7 років тому +2

    Awesome video my man! Just a quick question, at 5:00 why do you put 1, x>3 instead of 0, x>3? Doesn't it say 0 for all other values outside of the range of f(x)?

    • @marcbarry5861
      @marcbarry5861 7 років тому

      A CDF is the cumulative probability. So, the sum of the probabilities up to that point: P(X>3)=1. The graphs of the pdf and cdf are different. He did not graph the latter.

    • @mrcamilleri2934
      @mrcamilleri2934  7 років тому +1

      Yes, but this now a is a cumulative function, which is different to the probability density function. It means that the area under the curve will be 1 for any point where x>3, because we are counting all of the area up to that point.

    • @jaiso434
      @jaiso434 4 роки тому

      thank you for this.

  • @ayegbamartinadaji3322
    @ayegbamartinadaji3322 6 років тому

    you saved my life ...

  • @stevemwanza7521
    @stevemwanza7521 Рік тому

    Well explained 🙏

  • @jackc7475
    @jackc7475 2 роки тому

    very helpful, thank you

  • @salarhussain6189
    @salarhussain6189 3 роки тому

    bohat papi samjhaya re, love from Pakistan

  • @kidamongus7331
    @kidamongus7331 Рік тому

    why would you add area of A i. e. 1/3*1...??? There is an integration that will add the area already..

  • @ataarpac945
    @ataarpac945 4 роки тому

    wonderful thank you man

  • @caniko2
    @caniko2 7 років тому

    I understood everything, thank you! In part 2, F(x) is x/3 when 0

    • @mrcamilleri2934
      @mrcamilleri2934  7 років тому

      Because its continuous, it doesn't really make a difference because the probability of x=1 is 0

  • @saveUyghurs
    @saveUyghurs 7 років тому

    Excellent!

  • @dimitrykrot4341
    @dimitrykrot4341 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much

  • @hello-cw9cj
    @hello-cw9cj 10 місяців тому

    Really nice 👍

  • @baiqing
    @baiqing 3 роки тому +1

    Better than my lecture can I pay you the tuition instead

  • @PhilippeBalech
    @PhilippeBalech Рік тому

    Thanks man :)

  • @TheSwiftScript
    @TheSwiftScript 6 років тому

    Thank you!

  • @garyhe6267
    @garyhe6267 6 років тому

    Your voice sounds nice.

  • @thalassatrinculo
    @thalassatrinculo 5 років тому +2

    why is it 1 for x>3? shouldn't it be 0?

    • @nuraqilahsyahirah9798
      @nuraqilahsyahirah9798 5 років тому +1

      for the f(x) then , then yes x>3 is 0. but since its F(x) which is the CUMULATIVE distribution function, the value is for x>3 is 1 since the total area for overall is 1. the total area is 1 when the range is between 1-3. anything above 3, is considered more than 1.

  • @BetulGC
    @BetulGC 7 років тому

    Error in the final F(x)
    In the cdf while writing the function for 1

    • @BetulGC
      @BetulGC 7 років тому

      Ok, I see what is happening... duh! As the name suggests it is cumulative. Similarly p(x)=0 for x>2 but P(x)=1 for x>2! Got it. Thanks.

  • @thisiswhoiam7249
    @thisiswhoiam7249 10 місяців тому

    I have a question (in the 1st problem).
    I understand why the cdf becomes 0 when x < 1. But...
    The cdf is (x^2 - 1)/8 if 1 ≤ x < 3; and the cdf is 1 if x ≥ 3, aren't they?

    • @mrcamilleri2934
      @mrcamilleri2934  9 місяців тому

      I think you’re referring to the inequality signs relating to 3. When x is 3, F(x) = 1 either way. Whether you say F(x) = 1 when x ≥ 3 or F(x) = (x^2 - 1)/8 when 1≤ x ≤ 3. Substitute 3 into this and you still get 1. So doesn’t matter whether you include 3 in the second or last statement.
      This is because the probability of an exact number = 0. So the inclusive inequality signs are pretty much irrelevant.

  • @triple_x_r_tard
    @triple_x_r_tard 3 роки тому

    thanks chief

  • @Zahidalizahidi
    @Zahidalizahidi 5 років тому

    welldone man

  • @r.f2173
    @r.f2173 Рік тому +1

    thanks man

  • @memememe5465
    @memememe5465 2 роки тому

    How we get 7??

  • @samtheham1280
    @samtheham1280 5 місяців тому

    I love you thank you

  • @SomethingGamecatAdjacent
    @SomethingGamecatAdjacent 3 роки тому

    thank you!!

  • @ericaikens5970
    @ericaikens5970 3 роки тому

    Hate to be nitpicky, but why do you draw your x's like that...

  • @giorgion.6652
    @giorgion.6652 6 років тому

    Thanks sir.

  • @muraciaHQ
    @muraciaHQ 4 роки тому

    Thank you :)

  • @MrTomro
    @MrTomro 4 роки тому

    Thanks a lot

  • @keepbreathing2659
    @keepbreathing2659 3 місяці тому

    the second part answer should have been
    7x+2x3 /21
    no?

  • @Anjali-uz5ty
    @Anjali-uz5ty 5 років тому +1

    Thanx sir

  • @komalkhetlani3416
    @komalkhetlani3416 7 років тому

    Thanks :)

  • @jaiso434
    @jaiso434 4 роки тому

    thank you.

  • @echessbee
    @echessbee 6 років тому

    Brilliant

  • @figarofreeman1385
    @figarofreeman1385 4 роки тому

    thank you bruv

  • @abdullahzeb1727
    @abdullahzeb1727 5 років тому

    Keep it up

  • @benfu4364
    @benfu4364 7 років тому

    the video gives useful information, thank you very much
    better handwriting next time XD

  • @Anna-hn8nr
    @Anna-hn8nr 6 років тому +2

    why is the probability 1 at x > 3

    • @mrcamilleri2934
      @mrcamilleri2934  6 років тому +6

      It's because we are looking at a cumulative function. The limits of the pdf is between 1 and 3, so anything before 1 the probability is 0. Anything above 3 the probability is 1, because the cumulative function encompasses everything up to the number inputted, if you choose a number 3 or greater, it will have given the area of the entire function, which is 1.
      Hope that helps.

  • @bubbletea8793
    @bubbletea8793 Рік тому

    ty :D

  • @ashenafizenebe6135
    @ashenafizenebe6135 3 роки тому

    tnx sir

  • @vrujahisuware1466
    @vrujahisuware1466 3 роки тому

    how to find cdf from pmf

  • @thomasmcgurk3235
    @thomasmcgurk3235 5 років тому

    thankyou

  • @existentialrap521
    @existentialrap521 Рік тому

    thats wassup dawg on god

  • @celine.semaan
    @celine.semaan 3 роки тому

    you sound like you could be a harry potter character

  • @yoyo3djoyentertainment202
    @yoyo3djoyentertainment202 5 років тому

    hye sir

  • @fatawuabdul-razak8503
    @fatawuabdul-razak8503 4 роки тому

    convenient

  • @kieran1990able
    @kieran1990able 8 років тому

    Sorry i didn't understand the drawing. :(

  • @vedantpatil3535
    @vedantpatil3535 3 роки тому

    I didn't understand anything 😭😭😭

  • @judyithanderson3613
    @judyithanderson3613 7 років тому

    this is unclear put the camera closer to the paper next time I cannot see anything