Why we still need courtroom sketch artists
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 чер 2024
- In an age where everyone's phone has a camera, why do we still rely on sketch artists to document trials?
Subscribe to our channel! goo.gl/0bsAjO
We sat down with Christine Cornell, a courtroom sketch artist who has been covering trials for over 40 years to talk about why even in an age where everybody's cellphones have cameras on them, we still often need artists to portray what happens in courtrooms.
She has covered the trials of Bill Cosby, Donald Trump, Martha Stewart, and Martin Shkreli, as well as people like the Boston Bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and El Chapo. She explains what it takes to be a courtroom sketch artist and how she think that compassion is one of the key traits artists must possess.
She also gives a demonstration of her technique by drawing a portrait of Dean.
Make sure to check out Christine's website for more examples of the many trials she's covered over her career www.christinecornell.com
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out www.vox.com
Check out our full video catalog: goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Twitter: goo.gl/XFrZ5H
Or on Facebook: goo.gl/U2g06o
You just asked an artist "can you draw me?" and used this video as an excuse. Don't try to bamboozle me, I see right through
Robin Bucur ladies and gentlemen, we got em
+1 for bamboozle
bruh
r/iamverysmart
@@Pixdoet not really stupido
That sudden shot at the snowboarder was unexpected
Wait what where
Mmy Mmy ”every dipshit w a snowboard...” comment at the start
T K ohhh okay XD
Aye, I was 1000 person who liked
Yeah that was not necessary.
i really like the use of color in her drawings
@@gabenakamura4769 why would they be?
@@gabenakamura4769 Colour theory is very important in art. Colours can really impact the piece's atmosphere so it's not about the fact there are colours or not, it's about what colours she chose that moment to respresent the court's emotion.
You know what I DONT like?
SNOWBOARDERS
Yeah, she uses it like no one else. I think she uses it to make things colorful, but I'm not sure, it's kinda deceiving.
@@mikulashomolka1800 theres colour in real life. What? Is that deceiving too? I don't understand how using colour makes it deceiving
*_i've been covering trials for the last uhhh thousand years_*
I believe her
"Which was 1973"
Probably she's a vampire 😂😂
she must be like 50 years old!
Lilliana O'Neal *sounds quite right*
All the dislikes are snowboarders
Droids Mustache and Minnesotans
Yessssir
Or Trump, for getting his skin colour wrong?
Yes,that was really unnecesary
Well, yeah hahah
title: why we need courtroom sketches
comments: why does vox hate snowboarders
me who hasn’t watched it yet: visible confusion
Same I'm not even halfway watching this
Lavi_ Bluez but its at the start
It's at 0:36
@@picklepie5127 totally missed that!
Literally me rn
Is it me or does she look like a courtroom drawing?
i love how artists look like their art it’s so interesting
Pablo Picasso?
Doylee 🤣🤣
bells OMG I THOUGHT I WAS THE ONLY ONE
@@skelebells but what about picasso? is his eye really in his forehead???
"Every dip**** on a snowboard has a camera attached to their head" -Vox the classy news source
Jesse Newman
1. This ain’t a news piece
2. Joke.
@@About37Hobos what
It's new and woke
He's a loser
Glip Klopsyiop y’all are so mad over the snowboard joke 😭😭
Wow. She captures faces so well. What a great lady.
Feminazis arrived
Graceful Stallion I don't see any? Did you reply to the wrong comment?
Nati Whatever is this sarcastic tone or you akchually silly?
Graceful Stallion What are you on about lol
Nati, Whatever
Wow she is really fast and great at capturing emotion/drawing.
But how she can catch up all the emotions and draw them and dont miss the new ones ?
Is she drawing them in the court room ?
And yet, an oversize bathroom tile masquerading as MA is worth 21 million dollars. How much did her work go for?
Courtroom artists have to be fast.
@@cyber_HAF that's why she has to pick out up 6 to or 7 drawings per proceeding. Drawing pivotal moments and repeated gestures (stuff that sticks). She studies anatomy consistently to make the structural leg work easier. That way she can focus more on the emotions. She's been doing this a while. I imagine she's figured out plenty shortcuts to create the scene on paper faster.
I've always been amazed by courtroom artists. Like how do they draw so detailed so fast?!
Right, and the subjects don't freeze in that position so they have to do it all from memory.
I will take camera picture and repaint it later, original picture can be deleted latter.
Its not detailed
@@y0n_8 still pretty detailed for a drawing that fast
Ahri gameplay
This profession never ceases to amaze me, drawing that fast, that accurate and that beautiful is just incredible.
I've never really been a big art person. But ever since I was a kid, I always thought courtroom sketches were cool for some strange reason. I've always wanted to see someone either open a museum for them or publish a coffee table book about them.
Ha never heard that term but I have seen the exact type of books you mean. I know what I want for Christmas now.
Coffee Table courtroom artwork. “Courtroom Art: In The Dock with the Rich and Famous”
World Press Cartoon
I think there is an exhibit about the history of courtroom sketches at the library of Congress. But they rotate those things out so it’s probably gone by now
Melissa0774-you don't have to be into art. when they don't allow cameras in the courtroom. these drawings very often become historical documents when cameras are not allowed in the courtroom. motion picture cameras with sound do not belong in a courtroom. its an invasion of civil privacy.
wtf did snowboarders do to you
everything.
He skies
Stole his boyfriend.
Probably sprayed him and got snow in his pockets so he’s butthurt haha
FEEBY QEEFU I see more skiers spraying people here in the east cost.
3:28 "Unfortunately for Christine, I'm from Minnesota, so I'm unable to express my emotions."
That sounds about right.
“I’m from Minnesota so I’m unable to express my emotions” TRUE
I know right?
Uh what
What's the deal in Minnesota? I'm not from the US, I'm curious. Thank you in advance.
Victoria Escobar where what people call “ Minnesota nice “ and because we’re too nice to say things to your face. (:
@@MissRoux People from Minnesota are kind of known for being very kind, but also very quiet and socially averse.
I'd never thought about it before, but sketches add a layer of distance between the public and the spectacle of justice. I think that's a good thing.
She makes the point that - when she's drawing - this person *must be* presumed innocent.
+Eltener123 the only way the justice system reaches you is through you either being directly involved or reading/watching the news. And I think a lot if the time media is the ones actually distancing us from the real substance of whats being covered, like the trial of OJ Simpson example.
LagiNaLangAko23 Now that's a compromise that I can understand. We need a more transparent court that reveals what happened after the verdict to avoid intervention on all side.
So would an embargo on footage until the verdict has been passed
+Eltener123 Individual trials and the justice system as a whole are two distinct entities. Yes, we shouldn't close our eyes to the justice system, but involving ourselves in the concerns of individual trials is making spectacle out of misfortune.
How about cameras are allowed but media broadcasts are not.
Blah I would prefer media broadcast especially inside a Supreme Court case that would be interesting to watch.
Andrew Taylor footage could be watched after the verdict is made. But you have to respect their privacy.
Blah But then the justices will know that people will see them and they’ll be thinking of what non controversial and easy cases to decide. So, it can make the courtroom even more boring.
Stefan Unson court isn’t about boredom lol
They could be bought
I want a portrait done by her... but I don't want to go to court
Its the only way. We should go to court together
I wish when i was in court i had her there...
@@kamortegagarcia3442 I mean go be a lawyer or something
@@user-fm4dd6sx3i nah im never stepping foot into another court room. Plus i cant be the center of the picture if im not the one getting a sentence
Got something against snow boards vox?
Its a joke cmon
@@TinTin-qz2dx yeah and he's also joking
r/wooosh
@@racingdriverwannabe2415 this isn't reddit.
ItzDeo 06 haha I did the funny reddit thing give me points
really nice drawings
Ryan Smith oh what the hell
greenelephant1231 that's cute
@@mariamtutuyan2370 ok lol
Ryaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan
You have a default name
I definitely prefer not allowing media into courts. I think the problem is that it can end up creating a narrative based more on happenstance reactions and emotional displays than actual court rulings. I mean the media is not unbiased and will latch onto a narrative that sells the most. Maybe that's deciding that someone is guilty, which can influence juries and even if they're found innocent it might influence public opinion. Especially if it's a high profile case where people might have politics or other personal issues mixed in. Imagine if Donald Trump faced another sexual harassment charge, Fox would absolutely do everything to make him innocent and the people charging him crazy or something. It would simply not be safe to challenge any high profile person because you would be sure that the media would absolutely chew you up and you'd probably end up receiving several threats. If we are to allow cameras it would definitely have to be professional photographers specializing in this field, just like court room artists who will only release one or two pictures. Not a portfolio from which the media can pick and choose whatever fits their narrative.
+Clarence Baluca Guns vs knives
hedgehog3180 very well said
Then how do we know what's happening in a courtroom?
Donald Trump defended by the media!? Lol heck no! Nearly every news outlet is brutally leftist (except obviously Fox), he wouldn't get anywhere near of a fair trial if it was broadcast
P.S. Still a great point though; if you let too many people in on a proceeding your ruling gets skewed towards the opinions of the majority rather than from a true and honest trial
Imagine if Hillary Clinton sold our uranium to the Russians and got American soldiers killed through inaction, oh yeah, she did. CNN didn't say a word about any of it. You want to talk bias? You lose before we even start.
I want to know if she only does one drawing person? Does she sketch a lot of pencil drawings and then “paint” the more interesting ones? Does she start one and stop when something better starts happening? Does she do the full artwork in the room or complete them later? Who purchases the artwork? Do the artists fight for the best space? I HAVE SO MANY QUESTIONS!!!!!
probably sketches them as they happen but colors them later
@@kidthebilly7766 tht pretty much answers almost every questions u got @j bre
@@kidthebilly7766 i think they do as many as they see fit, were paid for, what they can physically complete in time etc. i don’t think they’re allowed to sketch inside the actual court, they take notes and have to complete the actual piece at home, because remember, the whole point is not be a distraction to the court. this way, she already knows what the big and important parts of the day were when she starts and no time goes to waste. they’re free lance artists more than anything, so they’re paid by whoever wants the art, usually it’ll be a news station when cameras are barred from the courtroom, though sometimes the lawyers, attorneys, clients etc. hire them. by the best space do you mean literally? physically they usually just sit wherever they can, but they usually change and adopt different angles in their art and they have the creative liberties to do that. best space as in best trials, i can’t say. i assume that yes everyone wants the best jobs but i don’t actually know how competitive it is and how much of a choice the artists actually have in the jobs they take. hope this helped!
Vox: "Every dips*** snowboarder has a camera on their head"
Me: *Immediately pauses video and checks the comments*
Same 🤣🤣
This lady is so talented and seems so sweet❤️
chance1201 yeah, but not talented enough to paint a canvas white and sell it for 21 million according to the guy that made this Vox video.
It would be cool if she could combine real life and creative imagery
+chance1201
Why is that female lawyer at 1:55 so fake tanned
I've met her, she is.
I was always wondered why we use drawings instead of cameras in this day and age. Thanks Vox!! 👍
Okay? So tell me what day we’re in and what age too.
So where do you work?
The supreme court.
Wow a supreme court justice!!! What an honor to meet you!
Nah i just doodle people with crayons.
Thats literally 10x better than a justice. You are my hero.
Leo it’s really not
TheBanjoShow yeah being a judge is way better. That pay check bigger
Depends which justice we're talking about. I mean, she's definitely better than Cavanaugh.
TheBanjoShow r/wooosh
Interesting simplification of creating art, but yeah, I prefer art over judging and sentencing people.
as an artist, she does her art so passionately. i love it.
If I ever went on trial and beat the case I want mine framed.
sumper man
So a picture of you being framed will be framed
ATOMIC SHARK exactly my friend
sumper man me too!
ATOMIC SHARK lol
When you'll go to the chair, I'll have yours framed.
I thought we needed them so we could make imagine what a courtroom graphic novel would look like get on it Stan lee
Misael Ramirez We do have Daredevil
imagine being the senior editor who heard/read the shot at snowboarders in the script and being like "no yeah that's good and adds to the video, let's keep that in"
I would raise their salary.
@@maxxvii2037 same here. That line was very funny😂
It was funny and ur just mad because u feel called out
GTA loading screens be like:
🤣🤣
True
While a photograph captures a scene with visual accuracy, a sketch captures a scene with contextually accurate in a way that a photograph cannot. This is more and more important as fewer and fewer reporters actually bother to show up when they cover events.
Except that conceptualize is exactly what you want to avoid, when documenting judicial proceedings.
@brett knoss
Precisely.
brett knoss exactly!
"Unfortunately for Christine, I'm from Minnesota, so I'm unable to express my emotions."
Nailed it.
I guess vox doesn’t like snowboarding 🏂
🤣
It’s funny cause they are all Snowflakes.
I know Christine. My brother used to do courtroom drawings in NY too. You've seen both of their drawings on the news.
That's awesome! What an awesome job
Having dips*it randomly thrown into a Vox video is just, weird.... One of the writers have an intense dislike for snow boarders?
He prolly forgot to do the pizza and ended up with his pole halfway up his ass before he did the commentary
Hellefleur they're all fokin Gapers
Lol the whole vid made me forget that
he's probably a skier
Yeah, not heard in one of those videos before... Weird...
The art is amazing.
But artists can bend the feelings to their opinion, a camera can catch the truth. Im not saying thats the case here but I can understand why they r being replaced. Time, money and ease.
I agree with you, but it is worth noting that cameras do not also tell the whole truth, how a photographer chooses to light and frame the shot, as well as what gear and settings are used, all effect the image.
The Comfy Geek Photographs can be manipulated just as easily. People are expressive and you just need pick a photo captured at a moment you feel portrays their character. I agree that the practice, while charming, seems out of date and impractical.
A camera catches the truth, but then the editor adds his perspective.
Cameras can lie too.
The Comfy Geek yeah but the problem with cameras is how people react to being broadcasted publicly. If witnesses are put on the stand but they know that they’re going to be televised, their testimony may sometimes not be as truthful or they might be worried about how they would appear on camera. There’s this podcast called Criminal that talks about these artists
I think we should have cameras I the Supreme Court, but I totally agree that they should be kept out of criminal trials
Pyrus No, because it’ll make them act like Congress. What’s the point if they do so?
There already are audio recordings of Supreme Court Hearings. You may want to look at www.oyez.org
*Why we still need courtroom sketch artists*
Because some law says you can't take pictures or video
No further explanation needed
@Tara S. Stories that expand on the context are actually really useful. Would you honestly have been satisfied if they just said "because it's the law"? Would you not have further questions about why there are laws for this at all?
You know I actually like the vox political videos but the hatred for them ruins it for me so these ones are nice and relaxing to watch
One reason there is so much hate for Vox: /watch?v=1X0lGFnCvQM&t=178s
There's a reason why they get here when they're trying to show their political movement.. just not to long ago they try to condoned Antifa.
Ph.D Dylan hey, sorry Im from the uk so I dont really know what antifa is but I thought it was interesting what they were saying about the medias portrayal of these more left wing protests
Samuel Ng but do they believe they are racially superior and want to cleanse their nation?
I don't like the political videos because that's not what I subscribed for. And 90% of the time they are very inaccurate and biased.
Nice drawing she did of you.
despite some of the dark subjects shes drawn, her art is incredible and could I say inspirational.
I agree. Cameras and videorecorders shouldn't be allowed. Media coverage of courtrooms makes it all very sensational and ruins the process.
Her art seems miles better and more practical than that other lady who paints white paintings
Yeaaaah.
Art is rarely about being practical, 'though.
Well the white painting was so impactfull and meaningfull that you brought it up under this video by yourself without it ever being named in the video. Why would you care about a white painting anyway. It´s just white. Nothing there... or maybe...?
Mr.Crazy so bringing up something ridiculous = impactfull (your spelling) and meaningfull? And that makes it exquisite, praiseworthy and worthwhile? Boy am I wrong about Hitler then, the guy comes up all the time in my history class.
Of course you had to bring up something you don't understand in a video about something completely different.
Having artists present in a courtroom is so much more than just capturing moments and making memories, it is about bringing culture in the room of justice, people who are full of empathy, are objective and willing to show others the world through their own eyes. Cameras are great but they are never really capturing the feeling as a sketch artist can. At least this is my opinion. :)
Still, a photo will always be less biased than a painting since it can only capture real images. Paintings are subject to the artist's point of view way more than photographs.
Gonzalo Bertrán Sitjar
I don't know if I can agree with your statement.
When and where a photograph is to be taken are also a very subjective acts. A photograph is also never an exact copy of reality; it's just a different attempt at approximating reality, like the work of an artist, and just because it looks more real, doesn't necessarily make it so. A photograph might contain more details of the objects in the frame, but might utterly fail to capture the atmosphere of human emotions in the room.
To quantify the "realitiness" of a painting and a photograph is not an easy task, and without having done that, I don't think one can claim that the one is more "real" (i.e. less biased) than the other.
But photographs can be still biased if they don't specifically show context. Artists can squish a scene to show moments that lead to the reasons the emotions are portrayed in a photo while photographs can not (in some circumstances of course).
Gonzalo Bertrán Sitjar
I would think courtroom transcripts are what we use for "less biased" recording of a court proceeding because they're the words used and nothing else. A photograph is the visuals and nothing else. Photos are still limited. Even video can't always accurately capture a moment. A sketch, however, is capable of catching visuals *and* emotion, and the emotion makes it more human imo because it captures what you would likely notice if you were there. Photos and videos capture everything regardless of how important it is, but sketches sort out the most important parts and draw attention to the things that matter most. How emotion is interpreted is up to the artist and that can be different person to person. I guess this could be biased? *But* she mentions towards the end of the video that there's more than one artist in the court room. Someone could look at all the sketches and draw their own less biased conclusions from there just like you would when researching a paper. You get multiple views (sketches) on the same subject (the people in the courtroom).
Quick Fix especially when the artist is this good.
"Unfortunately for Christina, I'm from Minnesota, sooo, I'm unable to express my emotions."
HAHAHAHAHAHA RELATABLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
In that case, I'm guessing that your: "HAHAHAHAHAHA" was done with a straight face like this :-|
@sbtopjosh bwahahahaha I can't contain my laughter and emotion!!! OMG hahahahahhahhaha!!!! :-|
I feel like these courtroom sketches have become something cultural in a way. Seeing an art piece that was created in real time of historic events is beautiful
Eh, we probably should still have some kind of recordings if for nothing else than archival purposes. Perhaps there would be rules as to how that footage can be used or accessed, but everything the government does needs a large amount of oversight accessible by us, the citizens of said government.
metaleggman18 That's what a stenographer is for.
The US Supreme Court uses audio recordings.
metaleggman18 live stream from a single camera, which includes the witness stand and judge.
We are the citizens of our nation, not the government. There is or at least was a vast difference. Getting a bit fuzzy though.
+Keith Robinson The government is composed of (some of the) citizens of our nation, though... and nothing stopping any of the others from deciding to run in an election to make changes to something they feel isn't right atm.
They didn’t explain why courtrooms still need these artists but only explained why they are allowed instead.I think the artworks are useless for legal purposes because they are too subjective, as she commented. Photographs would do a much better work.Her talent is truly admirable, though.
Hernán Vulliez these aren't for legal purposes though
Photographs and video aren't unbiased representation either. Picking which photos to use and which clips to show can change the impression you get as much as a drawing can. At least with a drawing you know it's an artist's impression.
Sketches are for the media, not for the court's use.
The only thing I learned from this video is that Vox has some beef against snowboarders.
"Omg,,,,, she is left handed"
Any left hander out there.
Btw, her drawings are awesome and she deserves a lot.
Ever Dyne EXACTLY.
Anyone else think she made Donald Trump look better in the drawing?
no, he used to look like that years ago
Zen Chan yea but he looks less like an orange
Jessica Badenhorst its less that he looks "better" but more that the artistic style was more realistic than the classic courtroom sketch. Hell, even compared to her other sketches he looks more like himself.
Zen Chan Yes he was once human coloured. But that's not why he looks better..... he's drawn more realistically than is typical for the art style.
Jessica Badenhorst He looked like that at about age 45, It's realistic.
She’s so good at her job. It’s not just drawing people. She’s capturing people’s soul, too.
But why does he look guilty as sin in the final sketch, tho? He's not even on trial! 😂
As an artist who struggles to draw still life or objects (not moving), I can't imagine what it's like to remember an emotion and draw it the next second.
"Unfortunately for Christine I'm from Minnesota so I'm unable to express my emotions"
😂😂
I could be a sketch artist if Kermit the frog was standing trial.
I like how she makes everyone look 100 time more attractive then they are in real life
Courtroom sketches feel so personal and intimate, like you capture the drama or embarrassing angst of the proceedings better than even a camera could. Almost like you're there. Love seeing the defendant look so guilty and busted.
"Every dipshit on a snowboard has a gopro"😂😂😂
I would argue that the courts themselves should be monitored by camera and tape recording, and should be released to the public (after the trial is done), because victims that couldn't make it to see how it worked or so that witnesses can't know what happened in courts if their buddy went in with a camera and filmed what the other witness said.
Although its probably fun to make these drawings and they're good it just seems outdated rather than practical.
John Alexander yes, in Singapore court proceedings are recorded by the state. Media coverage within is not allowed.
John Alexander rude
I was about to say the same exact thing. Keep the media out but use video recordings as documentation to be released afterward.
Yang Guan Tang Singapore, the freest country in the world, with absolutley no history of civil liberties violations.
Best comment thank you
My mother works as an artist I have to admit that even though I grew up surrounded by my mom's canvases and met a lot of different artists , the only type of art that I've always found fascinating and interesting was courtroom sketches.
If we were to switch to photography, I would say hire professionals who are instructed to capture neutral images
Nice portrait. She could do a solo museum exhibit - artistry, history, and a profession living in technological world
What was with that random dig at snowboarders? LOL Came outta left field.
David Boucard Lol, I thought the same thing.
She seems like such a wholesome lady!
I love how well she articulates her interpretation of the importance of her job
No artists, artists have biases, camera's do not. Should we live stream all trials? Probably not. However, we absolutely should record, archive, and publically release video (maybe after a year?) of all trials. This information is critical for maintaining justice and eliminating judicial biases in court. We have far too many innocent people rotting in prison due to unfair trials.
lol after a year? if the video got tempered and even the person who witness the court might not neccessary remember the exact detail
Photos can be biased too. Photos can be modified, and doctored with misleading captions. They can also show irrelevant scenes and leave crucial details out.
no live streams, there is no use for live footage from a court this is not a reality show. Cams with photographers? the klicking and rushing from one side of the room to the other side of the room makes to much noise, distraction, for my opinion.
T1Oracle-with respect.what about when there are wrongful arrests and non guilty persons?. motion picture cameras with sound do not belong. its an invasion of civil privacy.-
T1Oracle 💯💯💯 Not all court activity is recorded audibly neither and it should be.
Do any other artists see something so good it makes them mad? Well that's me right now. Time to get the sketchbook out💪💪
@idantfearbro Mad? Inspired?
@@dreadhead5719 Mad? Inspired?
@@cosmicforce5348 Mad? Inspired?
@@mrkrabslove Mad? Inspired?
@@kentrostomy6088 Mad? Inspired?
Her drawings are incredible! She captures each person's likeness so well. She's very well spoken, too. Great video!
What an excellent artist! This lady's art proves that the pastel stroke is much more expressive than the flattened blankness of a camera image.
This woman is an absolute Jewel I loved her and the video he's truly lucky to get that picture of him drawn by her it was fantastic much respect 💯
this never really answered why we still need them
Because we can't take pictures so the event haas to be drawn, that's what the whole video said.
Whoa VOX why you coming at snowboarders like that⁉️
Yah yah yahhhhh
Also, you can capture the expression and feelings throughout the whole trial rather than a second photograph or a minute of video.
Nice vid, and all. But how is this explaining the "Why"?
SCT Guer[H]onnet' She states that the camera can be unforgiving, which is detrimental to the defendant, who's supposed to be innocent until proven guilty.
In my view the reasons are not justified.. we don't need them and their case for "Why" has more to do with preference than anything, she prefers sketches because they have a more human feel.. That may be true but hardly qualifies as a "need".
Well there is a why. It's because cameras aren't allowed inside
kekagiso Exactly what I was thinking
SCT Guer[H]onnet' well at the beginning of the video "federal rule of criminal prodecdings" number what ever they said bans camera because they don't want exposure to the case...
Let's not "draw" the wrong conclusions from this.
Videos like this are what brought me to UA-cam in the first place
Her art is amazing! I absolutely love the use of colours
She seems so kind and nice
She reminds me of my art teacher. I would love to have this job. I hope it still exists by the time I can.
The same could be said of so many jobs, these days!
Her sketches capture emotions better than a camera.
Keep artists in courtrooms! Such an interesting profession
Wow...This lady seem so compassionate and her drawings are super fantastic👌
There could be 4 or 5 cameras stationed in the courtroom that would point at the witness stand, the jury box, the defence, the accused, the judge, and the floor where lawyers pace.
Ok but her artwork is actually BEAUTIFUL
I like her vibe She seems really intelligent, clear headed and sharp, like she lives in the moment
"And every dipshit with a snowboard has a GoPro"
Best line in the video.
Cuz its true.
I know Christine for many years. She is tops. Also a great gal...And I believe she was a young artist when Ida Libby Dengrove (the lady who wrote the book on courtroom artists) was still at work.
She’s so talented. As an art student i am inspired to look into this field of art. I really need to pick up pastels again lol
Her drawings capture emotions and the view of the court room much better than Cameras
I need a sketch of Mark Zucc in the Congressional Hearing
I don’t care that it wasn’t a court trial
I was surprised by the jab at snowboarders but appreciated it
Everybody ends up in court.
It’s really amazing. - Christine Cornell
She reminds me of this show on TV, they would read a children's book and an illustrator would draw while you listened to the story. It was pretty great really.
everyone talking about the attack on smowboarders
me confused about the slight at people in Minnesota
Can somebody make a movie about her, starring her? She's so lovely
I love courtroom drawings, they’re just so cool and when I get old enough I want to go and draw a trial.
I love Vox. Since discovering it on UA-cam I am never bored.