The Genius of TENET (2020) Explained

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 лют 2021
  • Written and directed by Christopher Nolan and starring John David Washington, Robert Pattinson, Dimple Kapadia, Elizabeth Debicki and Sir Kenneth Branagh, Tenet follows a secret agent who learns to manipulate the flow of time to prevent an attack from the future that threatens to annihilate the present.
    If you enjoyed this, check out my Philosophy of movies - • Philosophy of movies
    #Tenet
    Memento - • How Memories Betray us...
    Predestination - • The Philosophy of PRED...
    Support the channel on Patreon - / filmcomicsexplained
    Hey there folks!! My name is Niyat and this channel was created to assist in answering all your questions about Films, Comics, Games and Popular culture in a fun and engaging way!
    All music is sourced from Epidemic Sound. To try a free 30 day trial of their music please head here - share.epidemicsound.com/v33gf
    ABOUT ME
    Disclaimer: I do not own rights to any of the source materials I used in this work, appealing to allowance made for "fair use" purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research, under Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976.
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @Nexus-6
    @Nexus-6 3 роки тому +2465

    'Inception sure was mind bending, and confusing."
    Tenet: "Hold my beer."

    • @OlCheekyBastard
      @OlCheekyBastard 3 роки тому +137

      You mean: beer my hold

    • @agentc7020
      @agentc7020 3 роки тому +100

      @@OlCheekyBastard dloh ym reeb :naem uoy

    • @krklee77
      @krklee77 3 роки тому +10

      @@OlCheekyBastard FAK U BEAT ME TO IT 🤣👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

    • @OlCheekyBastard
      @OlCheekyBastard 3 роки тому +58

      @@krklee77 no I didn't beat you. It hasn't happened yet.

    • @OlCheekyBastard
      @OlCheekyBastard 3 роки тому +6

      @@agentc7020 damn👍

  • @thenewadventuresofhenry6998
    @thenewadventuresofhenry6998 3 роки тому +1424

    I get the feeling Chris Nolan LOVES heist films but doesn't actually want to DO a heist film. So he makes it more interesting. We have to steal from a dream, we have to find a new planet, we have to get off the beach, we need to go back in time, we have to be Batman.

    • @lastofpaul
      @lastofpaul 2 роки тому +78

      Last line killed me

    • @jasonspades5628
      @jasonspades5628 2 роки тому +20

      That's a smart observation

    • @michaelotis223
      @michaelotis223 2 роки тому +63

      he sees the heist subgenre as a means to explore complex ideas and concepts

    • @maxh276
      @maxh276 2 роки тому +3

      Fr it's awesome

    • @advocatearpandeb8403
      @advocatearpandeb8403 2 роки тому +15

      which movie do you mean by "we have to get off the beach" ?

  • @sebswede9005
    @sebswede9005 3 роки тому +817

    "Do you understand now?"
    "Yesn't".

  • @AverageAlien
    @AverageAlien 3 роки тому +1113

    Nolan: Yes
    *How confusing do you want this movie to be?*

    • @funkymunky
      @funkymunky 2 роки тому +90

      There, did you what see I.

    • @nomanmcshmoo8640
      @nomanmcshmoo8640 2 роки тому +23

      Oh, Man! That was BRILLIANT!!!!

    • @Shah_creates
      @Shah_creates 2 роки тому +7

      @@funkymunky hahahaha!

    • @OmegaJuggalo
      @OmegaJuggalo 2 роки тому +8

      Retteb eht gnisufnoc erom eht

    • @mkloven101
      @mkloven101 Рік тому +6

      Wouldn’t it be
      Nolan: Yes
      Didn’t you like how confusing this movie was

  • @Deep13tom
    @Deep13tom 3 роки тому +593

    Neil was a Silent Guardian
    A watchful protector
    The Batman.

  • @grapeshot
    @grapeshot 3 роки тому +1699

    That backwards fight scene was quite impressive.

    • @handev2604
      @handev2604 3 роки тому +8

      Agreed

    • @BlackWing117
      @BlackWing117 3 роки тому +51

      I'm still not sure how they did it.

    • @user-zb8ss9xb1b
      @user-zb8ss9xb1b 3 роки тому +43

      With each version of the fighter improving his fighting as the time goes on, which is opposite to the other. (I'm not even sure I'm getting what I just said..)

    • @jondavid1256
      @jondavid1256 3 роки тому +16

      @@BlackWing117 they learned the choreo forward and backward

    • @renendell
      @renendell 2 роки тому +10

      I watched this having never heard of it and it was at that moment that I realized I was watching a Christopher Nolan film. It all just kind of clicked lol

  • @BrandonLM777
    @BrandonLM777 3 роки тому +1011

    Throughout the film all I could think is, how bad was the future, that they were willing to possibly destroy all of time to end it.

    • @HishamA.N_Comicbroe
      @HishamA.N_Comicbroe 3 роки тому +28

      True..

    • @agentc7020
      @agentc7020 3 роки тому +74

      That’ll be our species future but we most likely won’t have the turnstiles

    • @gutzz1519
      @gutzz1519 3 роки тому +15

      but it was impossible to regardless so i guess that's the upside

    • @2Goodest
      @2Goodest 3 роки тому +25

      The harsh part is because the protagonist wins that is the future.

    • @andreasmerkel5717
      @andreasmerkel5717 3 роки тому +46

      It seems to me that the future is the product of the present, in which people destroy the future of their children out of pure selfishness and greed.

  • @gowronsonofmrel867
    @gowronsonofmrel867 3 роки тому +109

    To quote Enrico Fermi "Having listened to your lecture, I am still confused -- but on a higher level.”

  • @kevinwho.
    @kevinwho. 3 роки тому +894

    Of all the explanations of Tenet I’ve seen (and I’ve seen alot) this is the best one by far, awesome job

    • @filmcomicsexplained
      @filmcomicsexplained  3 роки тому +31

      Thanks buddy!

    • @bethepro
      @bethepro 3 роки тому +17

      Agree

    • @katnip7976
      @katnip7976 3 роки тому +1

      I don’t know. This one was ok, but I found the one by New Rockstars more fluid. I love FilmComicsExplained, just got a little busy with the timeline superimposed on the clips from the film.

    • @tylerdurden788
      @tylerdurden788 3 роки тому +5

      @@filmcomicsexplained I watched it 4 time's and I still couldn't explain it this well

    • @renearguello6950
      @renearguello6950 3 роки тому +1

      100% agree

  • @graciemarshall0
    @graciemarshall0 3 роки тому +370

    This was the first explanation of tenet that has fully made sense, I loved the whole diagram showing when they were going forward and backward in time!!!

  • @nerovanguard846
    @nerovanguard846 3 роки тому +886

    I have watched this movie 3 times now and everytime I do, I find something new. It's just absolutely awesome and I see it as a masterpiece

    • @danemania001
      @danemania001 3 роки тому +2

      @@npcimknot958 It was there because it always was

    • @kimjunguny
      @kimjunguny 3 роки тому +9

      nah, if its effect first then cause, then that means the effect of a bullet hole would be in that wall infinitely backwards into time. Or it just magically appeared whenever the fuck nolan wants it to.

    • @jsbrads1
      @jsbrads1 2 роки тому +4

      Yeah, I didn’t like the backwards bullets, backwards driving et al

    • @nhoxxikekute9x
      @nhoxxikekute9x 2 роки тому

      I watched it 6 times

    • @Telonious_Terp
      @Telonious_Terp 2 роки тому

      Same

  • @FrankFrankly711
    @FrankFrankly711 3 роки тому +266

    Tenet is pretty much a more complicated version of the Bill and Ted rule: "Hey Dude, lets make sure in the future we go back in time to help ourselves now!"

    • @Wanderer042
      @Wanderer042 3 роки тому +5

      I was thinking more Back to the Future on crack. There are so many time paradoxes and contradictions where it makes me wonder about the Infinite universe theory, where each choice creates a alternate timeline or universe where if you did not make a said decision and instead went with the opposite. Where Tenant keeps going in the past and create alternate universes to the point where I am amazed the timeline has not collapsed. Then again they Could've prevented Neil's death and went back to prevent the solider from ever killing him, but sill exist. Time Travel gets really headache inducing.

    • @whiskeywine
      @whiskeywine 3 роки тому +1

      Looks like garbage🤔

    • @FrankFrankly711
      @FrankFrankly711 3 роки тому +10

      @@Wanderer042 In my opinion, the film world doesn't exist in the alternate universes theory. People are either going forward or backward in the same timeline, and even if they think they are trying to go back and change things, it all ends up the same. "What's happened, happened." As Neil says. I think his younger self was told that his heroic sacrifice taking a bullet is what saves the world, so he is willing to meet his fate, and the other Tenet members aren't stopping him. To me, its one big infinite loop in the same timeline.

    • @mars_12345
      @mars_12345 3 роки тому

      ​@@Wanderer042 "where each choice creates a alternate timeline or universe where if you did not make a said decision and instead went with the opposite" that's assuming you actually have a choice. What if life, our "decisions", are prescribed? This way you always have the same, one universe and one timeline. Going back in time is more like rewinding the tape and playing it from a certain point. Now, given that You moving back in time is not the same You as before, meaning two of You coexist now, it was this way in the first place, before you stumbled upon going back in time. So it always plays the same way. Might ask "How it all started? It must have a starting point.", but what if it was always like that? If I recall correctly, Predestination has this concept, but it was also in Harry Potter. It seems that the loop has a starting point, so "who rescued first travellers?" comes to mind, but the solution would be that it was all set to be like that.
      Omg, being too verbose at this point. Hope it didn't get too vague :(

    • @chaikagaz
      @chaikagaz 3 роки тому

      It doesn't help cause who are you helping the you from 20 minutes ago or the you from 20 minutes ago in an alternate time-line or the demon from hell that looks like you etc.

  • @1101G12646
    @1101G12646 3 роки тому +94

    When Neil said at the end "this whole operation is a temporal pincer" - that should be the biggest give away about what's happening in the movie

    • @gidope4076
      @gidope4076 2 роки тому +2

      What’s that?

    • @duffalex24
      @duffalex24 2 роки тому +16

      @@gidope4076 to attack or corner from both sides, or the beginning and end

    • @saleimfinegan6622
      @saleimfinegan6622 2 роки тому +7

      I recommend the Netflix series dark

    • @burjalmadre
      @burjalmadre 2 роки тому

      @@saleimfinegan6622 oh that series is absolutely incredible isnt it?

    • @cheezoncrack1
      @cheezoncrack1 2 роки тому +5

      …Neil is literally explaining whats happened by saying that

  • @guardian3383
    @guardian3383 3 роки тому +455

    Anytime a movie dives into time travel my brain immediately melts

    • @testaccount4191
      @testaccount4191 3 роки тому +14

      most of the time they do it it is horribly wrong anyway

    • @testaccount4191
      @testaccount4191 3 роки тому +17

      @@lazysnipe yeah, because if you think about it whatever outcome you go back in time to stop, occurs despite you going back in time to stop it otherwise the event which triggered you going back in time would not happen therefore guaranteeing it to happen. So therefore when confronted with this type of situation the best thing you can do is nothing as anything you do would lead to the same outcome otherwise the situation would not have happened. my brain hurts now

    • @lukakulukaku2348
      @lukakulukaku2348 3 роки тому +3

      @@testaccount4191 You my friend is the protagonist

    • @faruqfathin9491
      @faruqfathin9491 3 роки тому +2

      But this melt my brain on a whole other level

    • @Williamfuchs420
      @Williamfuchs420 3 роки тому +9

      @@testaccount4191 unless its a branching multiverse then anything you do in the past just results in a new alternate future

  • @prsnheretodo
    @prsnheretodo 3 роки тому +118

    13:57 We see Neil first in Mumbai.
    In Hindi, his name means “Blue”.
    That’s a hint from Nolan about his direction in Time.

    • @amareswarmishra6870
      @amareswarmishra6870 2 роки тому +4

      Brilliant 👏

    • @MegaCharns
      @MegaCharns 2 роки тому

      That doesn't really make sense though , everyone is still always moving forward through time!

    • @slyder35
      @slyder35 2 роки тому +3

      @@MegaCharns the more you think about the "Neil is Max" thing, the less sense it makes. I bet that was the original idea they had, but since it doesnt make much sense, they didnt go deep into it

  • @sphere7158
    @sphere7158 3 роки тому +340

    This movie is so bizarre, and that's what I like about this.

    • @shomikoto7558
      @shomikoto7558 3 роки тому +5

      That's Nolan for you.

    • @jothishprabu8
      @jothishprabu8 3 роки тому +3

      That's Why I hate it

    • @hughes4263
      @hughes4263 3 роки тому +1

      @@jothishprabu8 why?

    • @jothishprabu8
      @jothishprabu8 3 роки тому +1

      @@hughes4263 This movie is pathetic to its core imo. It's okay If you don't agree with me.

    • @hughes4263
      @hughes4263 3 роки тому +2

      @@jothishprabu8 I definitely see where you’re coming from screenplay wise, stories got a lot of plot holes and it seems like it’s confusing for the sake of being confusing however I still enjoyed it. I think pathetic is a strong word though, seeing as the music, acting, and cinematography is all top tier.

  • @kingssman2
    @kingssman2 3 роки тому +140

    I watched this film 4 or 5 times trying to wrap my head around time inversion. Just when I think there was a plot hole, the film has an explanation that covers it. Also I like the concept of living backwards in time rather than jumping backwards.

    • @MegaCharns
      @MegaCharns 2 роки тому +1

      The boat scene where the protagonist saves satori is a bit of a plot hole.. it works out but it is very bad lol

    • @godmode2461
      @godmode2461 2 роки тому +2

      @@MegaCharns can you explain how it is bad

    • @Massivehero1
      @Massivehero1 2 роки тому +4

      @@MegaCharns he could have let him die but he needed him alive to gain his trust and information before allowing him to die.

    • @cosmicvoidtree
      @cosmicvoidtree Рік тому +14

      The way I think of traditional time travel (off the top of my head movies like bttf, terminator, and some others) is that time is a river always flowing at a constant (relativity being ignored, sorry Einstein) speed. Time travel is hopping out of the river and getting in at a different point. Tenet’s time I imagine as a line, and your experience of it as a piece of string. When you invert, you stick a pin in time and wrap your string around it and let it go backwards.

    • @HILAL19564
      @HILAL19564 Рік тому +1

      @@cosmicvoidtree nice

  • @chrisb1772
    @chrisb1772 3 роки тому +175

    This is why I love this movie. It makes me think. I have watched it 3 times and have watched countless videos on the movie. I've dove into reading on entropy and time. Christopher nolan knows how to entertain and ask questions at the same time. My favorite director and in my opinion the greatest director of the modern day.

    • @snypestaylor
      @snypestaylor 3 роки тому +3

      NOLAN IS ALSO MY FAVE DIRECTOR ALL TIME. MOMENTO, INCEPTION, BATS.. HIS CATOLOUGE ROCKS!!

  • @maxman3318
    @maxman3318 3 роки тому +51

    People forget or don't know that Nolan wanted TENET to be a James Bond Science-Fiction movie with an original story. There is an organisation, a plot, a mistery, the characters are similar. He didn't wanted to make nothing other than a new cinematic experience from this movie based on his passion for time and science and on his job, film making. TENET is something else 👍

    • @jothishprabu8
      @jothishprabu8 3 роки тому

      I'd take quantum of solace over this piece of shit

    • @wills.e.e8014
      @wills.e.e8014 3 роки тому +1

      @@jothishprabu8 I'd take Casino Royal than *that* piece of shit movie you loved.

    • @jothishprabu8
      @jothishprabu8 3 роки тому +1

      @@wills.e.e8014 Everyone would do the same too

    • @wills.e.e8014
      @wills.e.e8014 3 роки тому +2

      @@jothishprabu8 I meant that I would take Casino Royale (and Tenet) over that POS movie Quantum of Solace.

    • @MarcraM82
      @MarcraM82 2 роки тому

      gosh, makes me think how much better films like from russia with love or goldfinger are than this mess of a film.

  • @gondwanaman9362
    @gondwanaman9362 3 роки тому +131

    What I love so much abour it is that there isn't a single scene that feels like fat. The pacing is one of the best I've seen in recent times, it always keeps you attentive. And thank God it didn't do any backstories and anything like that because it would have broken the flow of the movie.

    • @nidhi4079
      @nidhi4079 3 роки тому +18

      The story itself is a backstory

    • @gondwanaman9362
      @gondwanaman9362 3 роки тому

      @@nidhi4079 k

    • @jaybot22
      @jaybot22 2 роки тому +4

      You must have been lucky enough to have snoozed through Michael cain and yacht races

  • @thewiseotter3884
    @thewiseotter3884 2 роки тому +13

    I like how at exactly 11:06 the timeline starts inverting

  • @OziJo1
    @OziJo1 3 роки тому +272

    Excellent analysis. This movie was amazing and I can’t understand why it doesn’t get more love. It was by far the best movie of 2020 and should be considered for Best Picture noms, yet it has been dismissed for less original fare. I feel that as time has gone by and more people have seen it multiple times, it is becoming more appreciated. I hope Nolan keeps up his genius output despite the backlash to his insistence that this movie be released in the cinemas at the height of the pandemic. A mistake? Not for me us in Australia as we were able to go to the movies from August. I saw it 3 times in the cinema :)

    • @zackadams309
      @zackadams309 2 роки тому +7

      I’ve said to people that this movie will build a following and be considered a classic in time. I’m happy that I am how I am in how I watch movies. Whenever I go to the theatre or watch something I haven’t seen at home, my goal is never to scrutinize or dissect it or try to understand it on any deep level (though often our brains are trying to do much of that automatically) but to sit back and just experience the film.
      I can recall sitting in the theatre watching Tenet and somewhere around an hour or so in thinking to myself, “I have no idea what the hell I’m watching but I sure am loving it!”
      I enjoy having to stretch my brain and think. And while I didn’t fully grasp everything as I watched it, it didn’t bother me because I trust Nolan enough due to his past work that I know he will leave what I need there to put it all together, even if I need multiple viewings to do it

    • @kubolor1234
      @kubolor1234 Рік тому +1

      It’s too terse.

    • @NoWondersWhy
      @NoWondersWhy Рік тому +5

      It came out at the worst possible time. So ALOT of people didn’t see it

    • @climate-moneymakingcampaig305
      @climate-moneymakingcampaig305 Рік тому

      I believe u are exaggerating or better say, u want to fit in the exaggerating groups who carry the award/honor of understanding the concept of the movie

    • @sammeyphammey349
      @sammeyphammey349 Рік тому

      It came out when the world was falling apart

  • @aaks4785
    @aaks4785 3 роки тому +126

    For those wondering about Neil actually being Max from the future, here's what I believe is the most likely situation.Assuming Max is about 9-10 years old in Tenet, he would need to be around 22-23 years old(maybe even less if he proved himself to be exceptional in academics) for him to have obtained his Masters in Physics as he claims to have to the protagonist. While there is no definitive proof he is telling the truth that he has acquired a degree through conventional means, I am inclined to believe this simply because of the references he makes about "their suppression tactics" and "his drinking on the job" remark both of which were true but were not integral pieces of information for the job at hand but were said anyway for innocent banter between them, even before Neil revealed his true identity to the protagonist towards the end of the film, indicating a very different and jovial personality in contrast to the protagonist who believes lying is part of the job.
    This means that after he obtained his degree while still being trained by the Protagonist and Tenet he was inverted using a Turnstile and now would need to go back in time by 13-14 years( again could be less based on when he was qualified) in order to reach the point of the opera siege at Kiev as that is his endgame.
    Here comes the most crucial element of time travel in Tenet, even while you are inverted and time moves backwards around you, you still age normally. Meaning if you want to travel 14 years in the past you need to physically live in 14 years of backwards time to get to that point. So if you're 23 and travel back in time by 14 years you'll now be 37 but 14 years ago. Neil is a middle-aged man in this film so this very much holds true in terms of theory. Now as to actually living inverted for all these years, as depicted in the film you need to be constantly using inverted oxygen tanks or be living inside specialized containers and spending that kind of life for such a long time I can only imagine that as pure agony. Honestly the most brilliant character in the movie in my honest opinion.
    Thanks for listening to my TED talk .

    • @martyg8137
      @martyg8137 2 роки тому +13

      In order to avoid this discomfort, could a person move backward but occasionally revert, just as an example: move backward a week but then spend a day or 2 going forward as a sort of 'break'? Obviously this would make going back 14 years take a bit longer.

    • @miroslavumlauf9967
      @miroslavumlauf9967 Рік тому +3

      @@martyg8137 The thing is if you do the forward / backwards approach you don't go 14 years to the future. Instead you can hover in time, in theory with thousand of yourself in the same spacetime, which would take about 3 years to live in the one day there and back.

    • @jaythekid4728
      @jaythekid4728 Рік тому +7

      On the tenet Reddit the theory has now changed that Neil is not Max simply because inverting back in time that long for one person or even a whole team simply wouldn’t work. Neil is just another Tenet agent likely recruited in the “Past” which is the Protagonists “future” As they are all stuck in a time loop now.

    • @AReallyLongAndUnremakableUser
      @AReallyLongAndUnremakableUser Рік тому +4

      I've just found out that the opera being played at the start of the film is called LULU, its a palindrome, and the second half is backwards.
      Also..
      The opening film company logos are blue and red.

    • @octoberboiy
      @octoberboiy Рік тому +1

      @@jaythekid4728 that sounds more likely

  • @hannobaalii_makendalii
    @hannobaalii_makendalii 2 роки тому +8

    A movie you have to see more than once. Kubrick would be proud.

  • @nickmattio3397
    @nickmattio3397 3 роки тому +22

    Robert Pattinson’s floating smiling maze head is so funny for some reason lol “Ifff Iii Couuulddd Turrrnnn Baaccckk Tiiimmeee!!!”-Cher

  • @AstonishingRed
    @AstonishingRed 3 роки тому +20

    This entire video perfectly sums up why I waited for the blu ray. I would of had to bring a notebook to the movie theater.

    • @RighteousBrother
      @RighteousBrother 3 роки тому +2

      Well, you see it on the big screen to REALLY immerse yourself in the experience, then you buy the blu ray, that's what I did!! 🤔

    • @Swimm12984
      @Swimm12984 3 роки тому +2

      Also, you'd need earplugs and subtitles at the theater anyway. I saw it in the theater and was filled with regret for having done so. With the Blu-ray, the audio is less abrasive and the speech is clearer. That was the most audibly harsh movie I have ever seen in a theater. Ever.

  • @kamidarko
    @kamidarko 3 роки тому +12

    I love those kinds of movies that bring me new methods of thinking and perspective without trying to tell me how to interpret it. Wild video man, thank you for uploading.

  • @yodaslovetoy
    @yodaslovetoy 3 роки тому +115

    People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually, from a nonlinear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey... stuff - some bloke with a blue box

    • @eialves6263
      @eialves6263 3 роки тому +7

      Allon-sy!

    • @redschafer7804
      @redschafer7804 3 роки тому +5

      lol thats exactly what i thought when viewing this film

    • @atharvadeshpande6907
      @atharvadeshpande6907 3 роки тому +3

      Neil and the Protagonist reminded me of River and the Doctor

    • @connorlee4820
      @connorlee4820 3 роки тому +1

      One might say it’s a Jeremy beremy

    • @janosd4nuke
      @janosd4nuke 3 роки тому

      Most people think time is like a river that flows swift and sure in one direction. But I have seen the face of time, and I can tell you, they are wrong. Time is an ocean in a storm. You may wonder who I am and why I say this. Sit down, and I'll tell you a tale like none you have ever heard.
      Sorry, I'm more of a Prince of Persia guy than Dr. Who, but was expecting and glad to see all you here. The River was strong in Neil for sure.

  • @seaweed8rain
    @seaweed8rain 3 роки тому +27

    hands down this is my favourite nolan film, i know its not perfect but the whole time inversion idea is executed perfectly for me

  • @abeeeshen3852
    @abeeeshen3852 2 роки тому +5

    When the soundtrack “Meeting Neil” is played when Neil arrives, it was said in an interview that the weird eerie sound of the music is actually a depiction of the protagonist having a feeling of already having met Neil.

  • @cant_nerf_this6732
    @cant_nerf_this6732 2 роки тому +6

    Christopher Nolan put a lot of thought into this. Well done. As a writer, I am jealous of the genius of this story.

  • @younggenos
    @younggenos 3 роки тому +40

    I just watched this yesterday and was just saying how I still don’t understand it, thanks for the video :)

    • @chaikagaz
      @chaikagaz 3 роки тому

      Now watch inception

  • @GF-wf8rt
    @GF-wf8rt 3 роки тому +98

    This movie was fantastic, I feel it would have gotten a way better rating if more people watched an explanation video

    • @Aceimus1066
      @Aceimus1066 3 роки тому +12

      Surely that's just poor filmmaking if you can't understand what's going on. I love ambiguity but this movie tries to confuse you

    • @jayvee4787
      @jayvee4787 3 роки тому +8

      If you need an explanation video for a movie.....
      The movie's shit.

    • @marcogianesello6083
      @marcogianesello6083 3 роки тому +9

      @@jayvee4787 no that means you're shit at watching it, which doesn't exclude the fact that the movie is also bad, buf if you were competent enough to give it a fair assessment you wouldn't need the explanation in the first place

    • @Evanderj
      @Evanderj 2 роки тому +7

      You can’t call theoretical physics or differential equations shit because you don’t understand it. It means your abstract comprehension does not meet the requisite. Tenet isn’t for those who want lowest common denominator Marvel movies.

    • @GF-wf8rt
      @GF-wf8rt 2 роки тому +2

      @@Evanderj 🤓

  • @hogquaffer4741
    @hogquaffer4741 3 роки тому +89

    Okay this seems really fucking cool and I'm disappointed in myself for believing the critics. Looks like he put a lot of thought into this, and it stands up to my hard sci-fi bullshit test. Watching it tonight.

    • @jacksonjones1141
      @jacksonjones1141 3 роки тому +8

      you won’t regret it, hope you liked it

    • @hogquaffer4741
      @hogquaffer4741 3 роки тому +16

      @@jacksonjones1141 It was really good aaaaaaaaaaaaa

    • @jacksonjones1141
      @jacksonjones1141 3 роки тому +4

      @@hogquaffer4741 let’s goooo now you’re addicted to tenet like me hahahah

    • @john-tobeymaguirecena
      @john-tobeymaguirecena 3 роки тому

      I’m a tenet Feen now

    • @interstaffing
      @interstaffing 3 роки тому +7

      The only critic you should ever listen to is yourself.

  • @dwaynehicks6838
    @dwaynehicks6838 2 роки тому +1

    Max is Neil just blew my mind , I've watched this twice and didn't pick that up , thanks it makes more sense now .

  • @uncleRand0
    @uncleRand0 3 роки тому +6

    One problem with the Neil is Max theory is that Niel would have had to spend at least 10 years in a shipping container (or other sealed room) going back in time. Talk about taking one for team!

    • @GaaraSama1983
      @GaaraSama1983 Рік тому

      That is the major reason why most people dismiss this theory. It's still possible but very unlikely.

    • @noseefood1943
      @noseefood1943 19 днів тому

      He could’ve put under an induced coma

  • @RazaMohiuddin
    @RazaMohiuddin 3 роки тому +14

    I thought Predestination messed with my mind. This messed with my mind even more.

  • @YourExWife
    @YourExWife 3 роки тому +5

    At 15:50, the question is asked how is Sator still alive to unfold his plan and to answer we need to get into philosophy. It's a fair bit simpler than that. It's possible because the one she killed is his future self. His present / past self is still alive just not on the boat. She even made the comment earlier that she saw "some other woman diving off the boat, and he'd vanished". That Sator was always the future one. The rest of the movie is past Sator moving (mostly) forward to become that future Sator. It's also possible that prior to killing him on the boat, there were 2 Sators running around for a while for an unknown amount of time leading up to that moment, since we don't know for sure at what point he stopped going in reverse to execute the plan on the city/algorithm.

  • @theNewCruelty
    @theNewCruelty 11 місяців тому +1

    Tenet is such a fun and intriguing film and this was such a fun and intriguing explanation. Thank you!

  • @coronado900
    @coronado900 3 роки тому +2

    You’ve outdone yourself again Niyat. Thank you for this.

  • @pheralphitness
    @pheralphitness 3 роки тому +8

    Sator wasn’t planning to detonate the algorithm; he was burying it under the hypocenter for the future partners to dig up and detonate in their time. Kat tells The Protagonist and Neil that they don’t understand because they believe he is burying it and waiting to send the email burst (or whatever communication). She tells them he is dying right now and he intends to kill himself and trigger the detonation from the future simultaneously. This would appear, in our eyes, as an instantaneous action. “Somewhere in the future a man in a crystalline tower flips a switch and simultaneously ends and begins humanity.” “We had our turn.” “Knowing this; do you still want to stop me?”
    A few other pieces are off in your explanation, but I only had a chance to respond to the beginning. I’ll listen again last week and finish my comment.

  • @thescarletcultist113
    @thescarletcultist113 3 роки тому +19

    This movie was so surreal

  • @SackAntil
    @SackAntil 3 роки тому +2

    Bro i have seen many videos related to TENET
    But you the only one who described neil's timeline 100% correct bro👌🏻

  • @41Vega
    @41Vega 6 місяців тому +1

    I always walk out of Nolan movies saying “well now I’ve never seen that before”…glad to be alive during these movies.

  • @slyder35
    @slyder35 2 роки тому +8

    I love how casually you explain that Neil is Max. "After getting his masters in physics, he then is inverted (for about 25 years) to go back and safe the protagonist at the opera house."
    How long Neil must have been inverted for that to make sense is a huge thing that you just breeze by

    • @slyder35
      @slyder35 Рік тому +4

      @@NoOne-wn9ju I bet they intended Neil to be Max, but since it doesnt really make sense they didnt bother getting deep into it. But the hints are there

    • @wiinterflowers4277
      @wiinterflowers4277 10 місяців тому

      @@slyder35 The last shot perfectly spells it out. That's show don't tell done right!

    • @slyder35
      @slyder35 10 місяців тому +1

      @@wiinterflowers4277 I agree, thats what they intend it to mean, but it doesnt really make sense if you think about it for two
      minutes

    • @wiinterflowers4277
      @wiinterflowers4277 10 місяців тому

      @@slyder35 It's something that's left up to the audience's imagination. That's why I like Tenet and Inception so much. Because we the audience are left to piece together what happens after even after the story ends. Nolan definitely has the show don't tell method down pat in his NON Batman films.

    • @slyder35
      @slyder35 10 місяців тому +1

      @@wiinterflowers4277 in inception it's a simple question of is this reality or not, and therefore it works. what I'm saying (again), is that when left to our "imagination", this thing in tenet doesnt quite work

  • @mess00747
    @mess00747 3 роки тому +6

    I finally get the damn thing, been bugging me since. I got every other Nolan flick at once but this one just flew over me. Thank You ❤️

  • @areyoufriendly
    @areyoufriendly 3 місяці тому

    This was excellent. It compelled me to create a folder labeled ‘ Explained’s ‘ because, let me tell you, this is among the best out there.

  • @shaygranger4866
    @shaygranger4866 2 роки тому +2

    This guy is good. I'm almost there, with the understanding of this film, finally!

  • @Azgara7h
    @Azgara7h 3 роки тому +3

    Sator DOES NOT go back on his deal with the future and trigger the algorithm himself. The purpose of the battle in Stask-12 was to bury the algorithm so deep that only the future could get it back out. When Sator kills himself, that releases a message for the future to find saying WHERE to go find the algorithm. If Sator has been successful in burying it, the multi-universe theory would allow for both the past to exist where Tenet failed the mission, AND for the past to cease to exist because the future would erase its existence. TENET’s objective was to convince Sator’s team AND the future that they were successful in obtaining the algorithm, and then find an empty shaft. This would allow Tenet to re-hide the pieces of the algorithm with the future at a complete loss about how to recover them again.

  • @theheeze
    @theheeze 3 роки тому +7

    Wow this is the best breakdown of this movie so far

  • @nickbyrd1027
    @nickbyrd1027 2 роки тому +2

    Such a great video! I'm really glad to see the general consensus of this movie shifting from "convoluted mess" to "complex proposition to think about the world differently"

  • @mattparks8434
    @mattparks8434 3 роки тому

    Your visual for Neil's storyline was exactly what I needed. Great video, thank you.

  • @TheBiggestAlEver
    @TheBiggestAlEver 2 роки тому +3

    This explanation is BONKERS for being so good!!!
    Great job man! I’ve seen this movie like 20 and a half times and this is still tying up some loose ends I’ve had in my understanding of it!
    Thanks a trillion!!!✊🏾🦉💯

  • @shainewhite2781
    @shainewhite2781 3 роки тому +10

    This movie is impressive! I liked how they filmed everything backwards. I told my family this is how time travel is supposed to be. Done in a realistic way.

    • @handev2604
      @handev2604 3 роки тому +1

      Yep

    • @lenifoster5360
      @lenifoster5360 3 роки тому +1

      Imo, it is the most fitting and realistic example of time travel I’ve seen in any film. ⚡️⚡️⚡️

  • @jameseglavin4
    @jameseglavin4 3 роки тому +2

    Probably the best breakdown I’ve seen, and I watched a ton of them after thoroughly enjoying Tenet. Kudos!

  • @xBloodXGusherx
    @xBloodXGusherx 3 роки тому

    FilmComicsExplained is probably the only guy suited to breakdown this movie.
    Such a great channel. Thank you much!

  • @spacegandalf2367
    @spacegandalf2367 3 роки тому +12

    ...adding new meaning the the phrase 'why are you hitting yourself?'
    Lol Thank you

  • @stevendunn2501
    @stevendunn2501 3 роки тому +49

    Other than being able to get "Neil" from the reversed spelling of "Maximilien", there's no evidence to confirm that Neil and Maximilien are the same person.

    • @lukekingsland5851
      @lukekingsland5851 3 роки тому +12

      And it also only works if you don't spell it "Maximilian", which is the correct spelling.

    • @KC_Smooth
      @KC_Smooth 3 роки тому +7

      @@npcimknot958 That could be nothing but a coincidence. It’s still nothing but a theory regardless of how likely/unlikely it is.

    • @aidanbalac
      @aidanbalac 3 роки тому +8

      This would also imply that Neil spent the majority of his life inverted which would be kinda dumb

    • @funbigly
      @funbigly 2 роки тому +2

      Once upon a time, people would stroke their beards, ponder the good book, and envisage meanings. Now they stroke their beards, ponder a Nolan movie, and envisage meanings. Same shit, different day.

    • @BRNRDNCK
      @BRNRDNCK 2 роки тому +7

      Then why did Nolan have Pattinson speak in an accent he doesn’t have and die his hair the same color as Kat’s and the same color as Max? Maximilien is the correct spelling outside the United States.
      You should also watch the closing scene and listen closely to Neil’s final monologue. Keep in mind that by the time of that scene, Neil is actually dead (unless he’s Max). His closing lines seem to be about Tenet stopping the future threat, but they’re also about _himself_ as a child walking out of school, right after his mother Kat was going to be assassinated. That is the huge reveal people miss.

  • @HIMMBelljuvo
    @HIMMBelljuvo 3 роки тому +2

    VERY underrated movie. No lie

  • @joris_db
    @joris_db 3 роки тому +9

    I was hoping that you'd make a video about this. This movie is awesome 😍

  • @Sainte305
    @Sainte305 Рік тому +5

    I love science and films that use real science to entertain use. While I think Nolan makes some exquisitely complex and tightly crafted films, I don't they're that complicated. I can't wait for Oppenheimer, reading up on the film I'm excited to see how they recreated the atomic blast with practical effects and diving into the effects breakdown of it. Oppenheimer is going to be epic with Cillian Murphy in the lead role, such an underrated actor.

  • @maxpowers6033
    @maxpowers6033 3 роки тому +4

    I looked at time travel in this movie as like moving around and seeing the world and environment on rewind. Best explanation video on UA-cam thank you!

  • @sammeyphammey349
    @sammeyphammey349 Рік тому

    I must say, out of all the videos on this movie, yours is probably the one I thought was most explanatory. Thanks mate

  • @shivanaga
    @shivanaga 3 роки тому +1

    Hands down the best explanation I've seen for TENET.

  • @assasin19991999
    @assasin19991999 3 роки тому +5

    THIS IS MY FAVORITE MOVIE OF ALL
    Never seen a smarter, entertaining and rewarding movie in my life, and I am a movie junkie.

  • @mikeoppart
    @mikeoppart 3 роки тому +4

    I must've watched like 9 videos on this movie to help me fully understand it. This one was the best one.

  • @Naeem_El
    @Naeem_El 3 роки тому +2

    Bro thank you so much for doing this movie so I can get a clear understanding. Keep up the great work 👍👍

  • @Fuyoualliamjacpac
    @Fuyoualliamjacpac Рік тому

    I went through numerous 30 min videos on the same subject that really just retell the events of the movie and dont conclude anything more than what I did on the first viewing and yours is the first that is different and shorter than most. Thank you for actually making an EXPLANATION video on this complicated movie.

  • @Thetopnoobpro
    @Thetopnoobpro 3 роки тому +7

    (The main point starts at Paragraph 3)
    I love how you took notice to things about Tenet that inspires it and tries to make us think about the world in a new way, and you thought about Tenet in a new way. I love how tenet reflects off of the world in a great way because it is both certain and uncertain at the same time, a paradox.
    The protagonist does not know as much as everyone else, he basically represents the audience trying to figure out more. Which is one reflection. People in the world do not know much about certain things that could be going on in the world at the very moment.
    And to explain what I mean that things can be certain and uncertain at the same time is the timeline off screen. At the end of the day max being Niel is just a theory, it’s not confirmed, it’s possible and not possible at the same time. The main point is tho that HOW the events of the protagonist creating the tenet organization, his friendship with Niel, and what happened in the future is all up to interpretation. However it is certain that that did indeed happen. It is certain that the protagonist did find tenet, he did have a friendship with Niel and that the world did end up falling apart and needing to turn back. It’s just the specifics are uncertain, but the outlines are certain, just like how things in the real world work. The outlines of how the world’s geography changed over time for example is probably certain because we know that the worlds geography just could not be the same for millions of years. The specifics however are uncertain or only theoretical because we were not there at the time to observe the world change but it is certain the world changed so it is certain that the specifics did happen but we are uncertain as to how.
    Paradox. Kinda... unless I’m just getting a bit ahead of myself :/
    Great video non the less, very informative.

  • @remuslazar2033
    @remuslazar2033 3 роки тому +12

    This was the only movie I saw in 2020 in a cinema

    • @lenifoster5360
      @lenifoster5360 3 роки тому +1

      Me too. Bizarre and appropriately fitting at the same time. ⚡️⚡️⚡️

    • @RighteousBrother
      @RighteousBrother 3 роки тому +2

      I was lucky enough to see Tenet and an Imax screening of Inception roundabout the same time!

  • @Messines17
    @Messines17 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent video, really enjoyed your analysis and explanation

  • @stuartshearer1412
    @stuartshearer1412 2 роки тому

    Excellent work. Thank you, Nihat. 👏👏👏👏

  • @stevespag9144
    @stevespag9144 3 роки тому +5

    Excellent video. The Neil reveal about him being Kat's son makes a lot of sense and it's something I hadn't considered!

  • @DXHero0X
    @DXHero0X 2 роки тому +4

    I know some people think the character aspects of this movie is not the strongest and i some what agree but the fact this is the only movie that makes time reversal understandable makes this movie remarkable!

  • @blackthorne-rose
    @blackthorne-rose 2 роки тому +1

    Every time I come in to look at your work Danny I'm just so impressed and amazed and enlightened and inspired by the love of cinema that you share with so much thoughtfulness and depth of realization. Love it.

  • @Thimble-berry
    @Thimble-berry 3 роки тому +1

    This sailed so far over my head, but I was riveted. Very enjoyable video.

  • @LordCoeCoe
    @LordCoeCoe 3 роки тому +32

    tbh the ending battle was really impressive to be honest.

    • @dragonmares59110
      @dragonmares59110 3 роки тому +5

      I felt the complete opposite, the ending battle was the weakest part of the movie by far in my opinion.

    • @Kiss_My_Aspergers
      @Kiss_My_Aspergers 3 роки тому +3

      Your repetitive sentence is kind of repetitive. 😉

    • @lokipks01
      @lokipks01 3 роки тому

      Maybe because it was really the beginning battle?

    • @SPFLDAngler
      @SPFLDAngler 3 роки тому +2

      To be honest to be honest.

    • @agentc7020
      @agentc7020 3 роки тому

      @@dragonmares59110 It was such a cool concept, sure we didn’t see people bleed to death like in other war movies but it was a fucking amazing concept that ended with Neils death, a very good scene for me.

  • @Disciple7218
    @Disciple7218 3 роки тому +9

    This movie, just like all of Christopher Nolan’s films is amazing. Christopher Nolan is definitely in the top ten directors of all time

  • @corey0tucker0ct
    @corey0tucker0ct 2 роки тому +1

    FCE could quite possibly be the most underrated YT ever. I mean this is concise beyond perfection. I still have no idea what is going on in this movie, much like memento, but my god what a way to walk through this one.

  • @rogerchavez2531
    @rogerchavez2531 Рік тому

    Best explanation yet. Seen it 4 times and this is really gonna help next time I pit it on. Thanks. Also hate that UA-cam unsubscribes me from channels, good thing I found this one again

  • @xsthetic7239
    @xsthetic7239 3 роки тому +7

    Great explanation video. Its clear, consice and explained in a way that is accessible to a wide range of audience. Not to difficult to understand for people with limited knowledge on these advanced subjects and scientific theorys. But also not boring for the experts out there that have seen the movie a dozen times and watched a couple of videos on Entropy. Lol. Anyway good job as always. I will definitely keep sharing your videos with friends and family.

  • @hampatties4859
    @hampatties4859 3 роки тому +11

    Watched this video in reverse 🤜🤛

  • @arthurrelke
    @arthurrelke 3 роки тому +2

    Entropy is beautiful

  • @dezt4903
    @dezt4903 3 роки тому +2

    This movie was very well put together. I saw it in theaters twice because I enjoyed it that much.

  • @halildogan7075
    @halildogan7075 2 роки тому +4

    These are not dislikes, these are inverted likes

  • @lunacouer
    @lunacouer 2 роки тому +9

    "Nolan suggests that the greater good for the world sits somewhere between the poles of knowledge and feeling for prosperity".
    Thank you. I needed that context before I go back in to rewatch it.
    I noticed that while blue and red in the film signify which direction they're going, Kat it wearing both colors during her last time with Sator. And I could not for the life of me understand why.
    But maybe if blue, from present to future, is doing your best to feel out what to do next (the color she's wearing when we first meet her) and red, from future to past, is having all the knowledge of how that played out, her wearing both is feeling that anger she needed to kill him, while also knowing that killing him before the flare was still ok (she saw herself diving off the boat already, so it must've worked out).

  • @GordonFlash1983
    @GordonFlash1983 8 місяців тому

    Memento, Inception was intriguing and mind bending. But Tenet is 'Whoah', Nolan has taken it to a new level. Underrated, will always be underrated, it took me 5 viewing plus loads of UA-cam explanations to get my head round the subject matter.

  • @generaldvw
    @generaldvw 2 роки тому

    This was helpful…best assessment I have seen so far.

  • @elilastnamington9808
    @elilastnamington9808 3 роки тому +3

    If you’re fighting someone moving in the other direction, you either win in the very beginning, or you lose, so after first contact you’re always best off running away so they don’t have a chance to win in their beginning.

  • @LilKittyKat-C
    @LilKittyKat-C 3 роки тому +4

    Some scenes of this movie were made in Estonia, love it when some great films have scenes made in my home country.

  • @bonoki3870
    @bonoki3870 3 роки тому +1

    i. love. this. film. i also love any UA-cam channel that goes into the deeper workings of the film. thanks for this.

  • @j.a.velarde5901
    @j.a.velarde5901 11 місяців тому

    I subscribed thanks to you and your teams efforts here. Thank you and good work.

  • @freeklee3053
    @freeklee3053 3 роки тому +8

    This video just cleared my mind after watching it more than 7 times. Really love it

  • @peedub0322
    @peedub0322 3 роки тому +4

    Wow! Legit just watched this movie Friday night and one of my fav explainer of things makes the video I needed to appear... AND on my day off. I think he is a time traveler. He read this comment in the future and so he released this video today so I could see it.

  • @roberthipolito1351
    @roberthipolito1351 3 роки тому +2

    This is the best explanation channel

  • @GRBandog
    @GRBandog Рік тому

    Astonishing work ! @FilmComicsExplained

  • @interstaffing
    @interstaffing 3 роки тому +7

    6:03 "..he goes back on his commitment to those in the future.."
    My understanding was that the future *wanted* the algorithym to be activated.
    What'd I miss?
    Genuinely Curious
    cheers

  • @Heliumjoker
    @Heliumjoker 3 роки тому +21

    So neil was wearing an oxygen tank for how many years? 🤣

    • @Masenken
      @Masenken 3 роки тому +4

      Looked like they had plenty of environments where they had buildings setup to accommodate anyone going back. While Neil definitely played the long game, you have to remember, as a group, they were operating at all times, so he had plenty of ways to "live" his reversed life.
      I would also go so far ss to say he didn't go straight back, but did it in jumps, going forward when necessary to keep the protagonist on his path or stopping whatever action was necessary before resuming again and finally meeting his end at the beginning.
      All said, the dude was a fuggin boss on par with the protagonist to the last... Beginning.

    • @Masenken
      @Masenken 3 роки тому

      @@darthvader1793 I'm easily entertained 🤣

    • @daviesugo7641
      @daviesugo7641 2 роки тому

      @@Masenken so how old was he when joint tenet then. Cause he had to wait to get his PhD then join tenet then go back in time, that must have taken a long time

    • @Masenken
      @Masenken 2 роки тому +1

      @@daviesugo7641 assuming he kept a decent relationship with his mom, he might've known since as early as his early teens and with events unfolding in exactly the way the Protagonist spelled it out, it probably didn't take much convincing to get him to join the cause. Even resort as he likely looked up to him like a best friend and father figure.

  • @gustavorosas4065
    @gustavorosas4065 3 роки тому +1

    I’m glad this channel made an explanation video for this film! I personally enjoyed this film in theaters but not everyone were pleased with this film. Perhaps they ought to give this film another chance as it is a very complicated film that takes time to process

  • @eddytytan
    @eddytytan 3 роки тому

    Best explanation on UA-cam so far!