In my opinion, Russia is number 1, because it was attacked by more than 35 countries and the economic embargo was still able to survive, in fact, many are interested in joining BRICS😅
Economic embargos aren't so destructive, also some products price in Russia grew by 150% by the embargo, also Russia is probably being secretly financed economicaly by China.
Number 1? Its taking them 2 years to take over Ukraine man.. What you even talking about.. Their army and technogical support is shite. I mean they been much better when USSR was existing.. Only power they gotta now is only them nukes, which I think most of them don't work anyway..
Türkiyenin akp ile nazik ..tünü dünya daha henüz görmedi test edilmedi bu, akpli kainat imaminin ülküsünden dolayi ! Gazze daha ilk 1.haftada bin tane 15 temmuz gördü hala ayakta iman o işte arabin en onurlusu filistinliler cünkü mescidi aksanin muhafizi. Türkiye bürokrasisi içinde olarak yani 15 temmuz destanın yarisi akp ile firildak 15 temmuzdan 250 şehit gazi kahramandan başka hiçbir umumî savaş cihad sinavi vermedi gözünü aç gözünü
What is the decisive criterion for the allocation of places on the list? How, for example, can Germany be behind Spain, even though all values are higher except for the navy?
@@notwho-uf4nt ВВП номинальный 1,5%.Против 24% у США.Это в 16 раз меньше чем у США в 2,5 раза меньше чем Англия при том что население Англии в 3 раза меньше.Это означает что средний англичанин живёт в 6 раз лучше среднего россеянца
top strongest 1 person with machine gun 2 person with m3 3 person with 2 45 pistol 4 person with 1 45 pistol 5 person with machete but does not count those who has will to fight
The Russian Armed Forces took first place in the updated ranking of U.S. magazine. News & World Report. The assessment is based on surveys of residents of 36 countries, a total of 17.2 thousand people were surveyed. She was nominated according to 73 criteria. Most of the respondents said that the Russian army is the strongest in the world. The Ukrainian Armed Forces took sixth place. The US, China, Israel and South Korea took second, third, fourth and fifth place respectively. At the end of the list are the armies of Estonia, Singapore and Luxembourg.
You don't determine who has the most powerful military force by conducting a survey. What do average citizens know about military strength, tech, economy, and warfare? US has the best military tech, most war experience, best economy, bases everywhere, allies everywhere, and all the best military companies - Lockheed Martin, Raytheon Technologies, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, etc. - are in USA. All that would come in full force if WW3 happened.
Soldiers are selected according to the principles: friendly, cold-blooded, non-confrontational, executive, able to work in one team. Aggressive, nervous, conflicted are rejected at the stage of formation of the unit. Commanders try to select representatives of different ethnic groups in one unit so that the general consciousness is not the same, because extreme situations are different. the principle of military brotherhood (historical address in the Russian army "brother") Video *"Soldiers of Great Russia",* one platoon: Russian soldiers in Ukraine (ethnic composition: ethnic Russians (Balto Slavs with Finno-Ugrians mixture), ethnic Ukrainians (Balto-Slavs with Turks mixture), Ethnic Tatars (Finno-Ugrians with Turks mixture), Ethnic Caucasians (Arabs with Turcs and Iranians mixture)) The song "Wait for me" *1QWCPhzSfm0* Soldier after the action, a slight injury */shorts/I31SIWZzeLo*
@@Deezhan Rankings and polls don't matter. I will describe why below. Publication of a military analyst in the UN research structure: “Counting the number of units of military equipment is the most senseless task in existence. So it is impossible to get an adequate assessment of the strength of the Army, because there are much more important factors than armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles, aircraft, and so on. This does not work. Many still believe that victory in the coming war will be for those who have more high technology. I hasten to disappoint - technology actually has an insignificant impact. Money is also considered one of the myths - whoever is richer can afford to almost buy every person inside the enemy country. Alas, this is not so. The main goal of any modern army is politics. Fulfillment of specific political tasks. There is no war for the sake of war, and victory is only politics. Therefore, any war is also politics, just using more radical means to achieve the task. Even when it comes to containing the aggressor country. Many now think that the Russians have surrendered in Syria. I do not think so. Their commander-in-chief clearly outlined two tasks. The first is to stabilize the legitimate government, the second is to create conditions to find a political compromise. Note that the goal of the complete destruction of the opposition was not pursued here. In political language, this is - and there is a victory. Both tasks were achieved and for this it was not necessary to completely destroy the forces of the second side. Although they could wipe out resistance from the face of the earth, using a small part of their nuclear potential. America is exactly the opposite. Of course, the United States has trained soldiers. There is also a technological advantage. Most likely, we are the first in the world in military technology. Hence, the military potential is greater than that of any other country in the world. Everything would be fine, but it doesn't matter. In reality, things are completely different. Consider World War II, where the US military literally did nothing. They won only the most shameful of victories, and those with very, very great difficulty. Take the same Panama - there they simply did not see any resistance. And is this a win? Go ahead. If I was ever asked to choose a military intervention, I would be reluctant to name Desert Storm. The Iraqis were then expelled from Kuwait, however, they had to pay too high a price for this. So what kind of assessment of the armed forces can we talk about? Yes, the Americans have the most advanced weapons, but comparing this with the real combat potential of Russia is simply pointless. All these years they carried out combat missions with the least losses. What about the Americans? Achieved only a few political goals, keeping quiet about the rest. Expensive and technologically advanced is not equal to victory. It is unlikely that even the Russians themselves will argue that for 10 years in Afghanistan, especially at the start of hostilities, they had absolutely no equipment. But the Americans were already allocating $20 billion annually for the military operation. But who actually turned out to be the most effective? Soviet troops managed to take control of the entire country during the day, and at night - the Afghans themselves. No fighters. What happened to the US then? Kabul, control over which was weakening every now and then? At the same time, the Soviet people built many hospitals, dams, airports, roads there - they made people happier. This is where I propose to stop. I think that many adequate people are now able to independently draw a parallel between the real military potential and the availability of modern technologies, huge budgets. You can argue all you want, but I consider Russia the most powerful country on the planet. Although their forces are not the largest, most technologically advanced, they are the most combat-ready."
@@Deezhan The crew of the Sarmat strategic missile system with heavy intercontinental ballistic missiles has taken up combat duty. The head of Roscosmos, Yuri Borisov, spoke about this during the Share Your Knowledge marathon on September 1. The bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki are nothing compared to the size and destructive power of the Sarmat missile, which is approximately two thousand times greater than the shells used to carry out the bombings mentioned. The Russian missile is capable of wiping out large areas (more than 551 thousand square kilometers), roughly equivalent to the area of France, which this missile can reach in just three minutes. One Sarmat missile is guaranteed to destroy a state like Texas, and ten are guaranteed to destroy the United States entirely. The deployment of the Sarmat missile system marked a new milestone: nowhere in the world is there an analogue of this weapon in terms of combat and operational characteristics. These are also units that fly at hypersonic speed and are capable of bypassing American missile defense positions. At the same time, not a single supercomputer is capable of calculating the trajectory for American kinetic missile defense missiles so that they are capable of shooting down at least one Russian maneuvering warhead. One of the most important features of this complex is its ability to strike through the North and South Poles, and travel at ultra-low altitude. It has a highly modernized radar and missile defense penetration mechanism. This means that after passing over South America, the warheads will enter the territory of the United States from the southern side, and then American air defense systems will be powerless to resist the Russian devil. A special feature of the terrifying rocket is its rather short stage (booster stage). That is, from the moment it is launched from the silo until it enters space, the rocket spends a minimum of time in the atmosphere, which makes it difficult for it to be intercepted by American and European missile defense systems, especially those located in Poland and Romania. Thanks to the adoption of this missile system, Russia has significantly surpassed the United States in military potential. “The adoption of the Sarmat has further widened the gap between Russia and the United States in the capabilities of their ground-based strategic missile forces, with the US ICBM arsenal currently the oldest and least sophisticated in the world, consisting of 1970-1970-era Minuteman III missiles. 's, which have undergone relatively few updates to their capabilities,” the observer notes. "Sarmat" is a three-stage intercontinental rocket with liquid engines with a flight range of up to 18 thousand kilometers and a launch weight of 208 tons. Sarmat can carry up to ten large and 16 small warheads. The RS-28 Sarmat ICBM is capable of delivering a multiple warhead weighing up to 10 tons to any point in the world, both through the North and South Poles. The RS-28 Sarmat ICBM will replace the world's most powerful silo-based strategic missile, the RS-20V Voevoda. Earlier, on April 27, 2022, the head of the Roscosmos state corporation, Dmitry Rogozin, reported that Roscosmos was mass producing Sarmat intercontinental missiles; a total of 46 complexes were planned to be delivered to the troops. The appearance of Sarmat in service shows Russia's ability to expand its nuclear arsenal even against the backdrop of imposed sanctions. The United States has failed to develop weapons that Russia has long had. For the second year in a row, the Pentagon has missed the target date for fielding its first operational hypersonic weapon. Meanwhile, China and Russia have already deployed their new hypersonic systems capable of flying fast and at low altitude. The Air Force also missed a major deadline last year, failing to field the new B-52-launched hypersonic ARRW missile by the end of fiscal year 2022 due to poor test results. Three failed tests of the ARRW launch vehicle under development derailed plans to start production of the rocket last year. On September 6, the United States canceled the key test due to problems discovered during pre-flight inspection. The West is shocked by the growth rate of shell production in Russia, writes Do Rzeczy. And all this costs the Russians many times less. According to the Western press, Russia, despite the sanctions, not only increased the production of shells, but also exceeded its level until 2022. In terms of ammunition production, Moscow is 7 times greater than the West. Estonian Defense Ministry spokesman Kusti Salma recently said that Russian ammunition production volumes are seven times greater than in the West, and production is cheaper for the Russians. According to him, while in a NATO country one 155 mm artillery shell costs 5-6 thousand dollars, Russia spends only 600 dollars on its production.
How did you calculate? According to your data, Morocco 61, Belarus 60 and Bulgaria 59 should be placed in reverse order. And this is not the only mistake
Ровно такая же ошибка, как и русня до сих пор остается в топ 3. После полного разгрома регулярной армии нацистской рашки, уничтожения сотни тысяч мобилизированных и постоянном призыве зэков на войне (а это я молчу про зависимость от КНДР и КНР) - рашка точно не может быть на 2 месте до сих пор
@@goldknightshaka7621 Colômbia vive em guerra com os cartéis de droga e com vários problemas na fronteira com a Venezuela.Brasil só a polícia da conta do crime embora alguns governantes sejam convíctos com a criminalidade.E Brasil não tem problemas com nenhum vizinho,mantem na ativa só o necessario e com uma reserva de quase 3 milhões de reservistas,quase 3 vezes mais do que o triplo de toda américa do sul juntas...A Força do Brasil é descomunal...
@@alanalansatos2114 ele é só um civil, não está a par da situação, e também você esqueceu de mencionar que quando a Argentina acionou o acordo com os EUA para defender as maldivas os EUA cagaram e deixaram eles lutarem sozinhos, o Brasil que segurou alguns caças dos britânicos mas isso porque invadiram nosso espaço aéreo.
@@wordmonster448 расскажи статистику боевикам Хамас)твоя Сша не может пол года победить,а афганистан выгнал Сша))на украине Сша 3 года ничего не может сделать)просит оружие у Эквадора))😄😄😄
@@defintity_9951завоеваны?Бравые американские парни сидели на укреплённых базах и охраняли только себя.А потом их пинком под сраку отправили восвояси.Повторили "подвиг" своих дедов во Вьетнаме.А те,в свою очередь,"победу" в Арденнах. Давай уже будем объективны по отношению к американской армии.Война-это не то,что показывает Голливуд.На самом деле все страшнее и прозаичнее и англосаксы в этом смысле "жидковаты" будут.
How did they come up with these rankings? The defense budgets aren’t ranked in order, and nothing troop numbers are in order. I always think the lowest ones are the coolest who cares about the best they are always best by default. This has Iceland
These rankings are of global firepower index which ranks all the 145 countries in military strength according to manpower, landpower, airpower, naval power, financials, labour force strength and geography and logistics and you can't say anything according to their ranking like this only first get information about it
@@user-lu7np8ss5e Turquia, Coreia do Sul e Itália são mesmo mais fortes que o Brasil. Porém o Brasil não tem nenhum inimigo externo. E está no continente mais pacífico do mundo. Não tem necessidade de se armar mais do que já está.
@@LargadoBSB mais forte do que brasil? Hermano En que? Te apuesto que solo mi pais colombia puede reventar korea del sur en dos semanas , pues en 1950 los defendimos de korea del norte en la chamada "guerra de korea". Ahora brasil fue la que invadio italia en 1943 creo yo y eliminaron a Mussolini. No podeos desprestigiar nuestras naciones. Tenemos que unirnos en contra de estas ""potencias""
Hey bro in your video of countries with most mosque's when the new Afghanistan flag came it didn't have the shahadat in it just the plain white flag please add it ❤
Совершенно необъективно, считать по бюджету, ну все мы знаем как воруют в США именно на обороне, тратят триллионы на самолёты которые не летаю, корабли которые не плавают. Армия США раздута, но когда они воевали ? Совершенно не понятно как тут считали, но понял одно, автор канала очень любит Америку.
I am really proud of you my country and this is only in 2023 and in 2024 we will be among the 20 or 15 most powerful countries in the world I love you my country🇩🇿🇩🇿🇩🇿❤️
@@A_l_e_x_UKR Чему завидовать? Тому, что и Россия, и Украина нищие?😂 Если думал, что я русский, то не обижайся, но я в этой войне хоть и не за Россию, но точно так же не за Украину...Меня бесит то, что моя страна тоже вам помогла отправив более 100к тонн нефти, абсолютно бесплатно, в то время когда народ нуждается в высокой зарплате. А Украина ни хрена не сделала, когда мы воевали
Yes, Ukraine is trash, Russia will destroy them, don't worry, I'm glad most Americans disagree with this sending aid to Ukraine, and I'm not even American.
Defense budget doesn't mean power. For example a very large part of US's defense budget goes on maintaining the military bases. Also building military aircraft and tanks and arms is more expensive in US and UK compared to Russia or China.
@@wiyiwiyiwiyiwiyiwwiyiwiyiw1274, а зачем России воевать с государством за океаном с помощью наземной техники? Ты настолько глуп ? То есть ты считаешь что с 50ых прошлого века годов русские и амеры пугали друг друга ЯО, а в 21 веке в штыковую пойдут? Наркоман шоле ? Конфликт с полосатым матрасом это ядерная война, удары ракетами и запуски посейдонов с подлодок, ну, а проецировать силу в небольшие страны которые находятся на другом конце земли как это делают пиндосы России не нужно.
When u have the bombe u should be before anyone else country And when you have it, it's not possible to value any country who have it For exemple with her nuke Pakistan is able as hé wish to smash down india but also china or even usa The nuke change all the references about number Time money or else than Can use to help an army in a War
Pas compris le système de classement. Je vois : en 51 la Finlande avec - 166 avions, - 5368 véhicules, - 24 000 soldats, - 246 bateaux. Et en 50 le Danemark avec - 115 avions, - 4024 véhicules, - 16 000 soldats, - 74 bateaux. Pas très logique ça...
La 5ème place du Royaume-Uni semble exagérée, de même que la nôtre, 9ème place ?? En termes militaire, diplomatique, maritime et nucléaire, en effet, nous sommes juste devant eux. Donc, il convient de rectifier : France : 5ème and UK : 6ème.
Украина до сих пор считается суверенным государством или это формальность? Откуда бы там 17-ое место при отсутствии даже собственного плохенького государственного бюджета. Могло бы быть образование государства, если бы власть не захватили "евроинтеграторы" (воры-коррупционеры). Теперь до Сувалковского коридора- одна Россия. Остальные формальности- позже. В России и армии-то толком не было до последнего времени из-за наличия более пяти тысяч ядерных боеголовок. Пришлось создавать по ходу конфликта воинские подразделения, но это никакого отношения к "мощности" не имеет. Вся "мощность" России была, есть и будет в том, что главные провокаторы конфликтов в мире (США и Англия) точно знают о своём гарантированом уничтожении в случае прямого конфликта с Россией. И...можно хоть зубы стереть до основания.
Ты хоть внимательней смотри. Украина не17, а 15. И бюджет есть. И суверенитет и независимость. Ты бреда понаписывал какого то. Россия за три дня Киев берёт уже полтора года, медленно, но уверенно теряя то, что захватила внезапно своим блицкригом. Украина же не минировала всё всплошную как рашка.
@@segaost про три дня как раз сказал Американский генерал три раза переслушал в оригенале звали его Милли, так что первоисточник этого американец, а то что вам там в уши делают это сугубо ваши личные проблемы. кстати рекомендую найти его полную цитату.
@@thetruthinthemiddle почему нам вливают? Это русским вливают пропагандоны типа соловьёва и скабеевой. Ведь если то, что ты говоришь, правда, то почему они это повторяли не однократно по российским передачам.
2:51 Defence budget of Armenia 🇦🇲 1,5 billion dollars $ dont 632 million. Soldiers of Armenia 55000 + 25000(Soldiers of Nagorno-Karabakh)=75000 active personnel ✊🏿🇦🇲
7:50 legends waiting for India 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
😌
Germany is way stronger. If they had the right to make crazy investments.
@@erjonhashanii3542there is no if ...
You guys are living the past India has the highest economy and therefore the highest spending budget and is therefore stronger
India😂😂😂 make some good roads and infrastructure you look bad.......then spend on military@@qe3boo-rz3zk
In my opinion, Russia is number 1, because it was attacked by more than 35 countries and the economic embargo was still able to survive, in fact, many are interested in joining BRICS😅
Economic embargos aren't so destructive, also some products price in Russia grew by 150% by the embargo, also Russia is probably being secretly financed economicaly by China.
느금마
It think it’s because of Russias cold territory.
Number 1? Its taking them 2 years to take over Ukraine man.. What you even talking about.. Their army and technogical support is shite. I mean they been much better when USSR was existing.. Only power they gotta now is only them nukes, which I think most of them don't work anyway..
Anyone can survive, but Russia is not thriving
Nagyon szepen koszonom. A josagotokat,kivanok az eletben .jo egeszseget boldog sikeres eletet nektek!!!❤❤❤❤
Gücün sahada ispatlanması gerektiği gün, gücün kimde olduğunu görürler.
Savunma sanayi müsteşarı
İsmail Demir 🇹🇷
Terrorism is bad
Türkiyenin akp ile nazik ..tünü dünya daha henüz görmedi test edilmedi bu, akpli kainat imaminin ülküsünden dolayi ! Gazze daha ilk 1.haftada bin tane 15 temmuz gördü hala ayakta iman o işte arabin en onurlusu filistinliler cünkü mescidi aksanin muhafizi. Türkiye bürokrasisi içinde olarak yani 15 temmuz destanın yarisi akp ile firildak 15 temmuzdan 250 şehit gazi kahramandan başka hiçbir umumî savaş cihad sinavi vermedi gözünü aç gözünü
sadece 2 3 sene sonra....patlayan fışkıran bir güç doğuyor...
🇹🇷 TÜRKIYE 🇹🇷
What is the decisive criterion for the allocation of places on the list? How, for example, can Germany be behind Spain, even though all values are higher except for the navy?
Скорее всего по финансовым затратам Но это никак к силе не относится
Bro what app editing you please reply
What software do you use to make videos? tell me please
- 2. Russia
- 15. Ukraine
- 57. Azerbaijan
- 60.Belarus
- 62. Uzbekistan
- 63. Kazakhstan
- 82. Turkmenistan
- 85. Georgia
- 93. Lithuania
- 94. Armenia
- 95. Latvia
- 104. Estonia
- 107. Kyrgyzstan
- 120. Tajikistan
- 143. Moldova
Russia more likely to be 5TH.
@@Germany_officiaI He is 5th with the budget
@@igroman9466 They*
@@igroman9466 Also what do you mean?
@@Germany_officiaI I didn't get it. What do you want to know?
I watch this video everytime while I been waiting for your next upload video... watching here in the Philippines..
Pls next countries by number of Temples
Indonesia 🔥🔥🔥🇮🇩🇮🇩
❤❤❤❤
From this it's obvious that if there were no need for a defense budget there'd be a 80% cut in income tax! And we'd all have enough to eat.
Certain countries have more food than others
I love my india Jai shree ram
Bharat Mata Ki Jai 💪🏻🧡🔥🇮🇳🚩🙏🏻
It feels bad if our friend is at the last place, but it feels worse when one of our friends is at the top! 😕
Brasil tem ainda muitos projetos para a defesa da amazonia e territorios brasileiro.🇧🇷
Os outros também
@@macaconotelefone9694 Brasil está criando laços com a Rússia e China . Você acha porque? Kkkk
Porque o presidente Maduro da Venezuela conversou com Putin presidente da Rússia. Resposta Estados Unidos! Kkkk
@@vanderleibraga4225 os projetos do Brasil são fica si humilhando pros outros que grande progeto
@@vanderleibraga4225 na lista ai são os países mais fortes independentes não alianças mais poderosas e cada um por si
Россия ❤ одна из самых сильных стран
Самая
Самая немощная
@@edwardskywalker4001 почему
@@edwardskywalker4001 Завидуйте молча
@@notwho-uf4nt ВВП номинальный 1,5%.Против 24% у США.Это в 16 раз меньше чем у США в 2,5 раза меньше чем Англия при том что население Англии в 3 раза меньше.Это означает что средний англичанин живёт в 6 раз лучше среднего россеянца
Are pilots/tank crew counted into the personnel figure or are those added into vehicle count?
7:53 ❤ my second home
Niceee. Love the both. Greetings from Brazil ❤🇧🇷
@@patriabrasilis 🇺🇸🇮🇳❤️🇧🇷
Забери меня в Штаты😂
@@user-zf4pc6yp8jsure I will
@@patriabrasilisYour have instagram sent id..i want followers..
Power full people come from power full places 🇮🇳 🔥 🔥 🔥
Pakistan 😂
@@yousefcham indian: are ye pakisthann ka bap ham he.. 😂👋🏻
@@user-vg1ni9kv6mMuslims Rule India For 800 Years You Indians Are Our Ghulam ..In Reality We Are Your DAD
The only reason your even on the list is because you have a ton of people. Besides that you lack anything the other major powers have.
🇺🇸🇷🇺🇨🇳🇮🇳😂👀💀
top strongest
1 person with machine gun
2 person with m3
3 person with 2 45 pistol
4 person with 1 45 pistol
5 person with machete
but does not count those who has will to fight
Does anyone know with which program he makes these drawings?
Do 50 popular Spotify artists
Men's and women football winners top 4
i love my india ❤❤❤❤❤❤
Wow 😊❤🇺🇸🇮🇳
YASHA O‘ZBEKISTONIM!!!🇺🇿🇺🇿🇺🇿
Yiban
Nice video we expect more video like this from you❤
Some countries are overvalued, others - undervalued.
The Russian Armed Forces took first place in the updated ranking of U.S. magazine. News & World Report.
The assessment is based on surveys of residents of 36 countries, a total of 17.2 thousand people were surveyed. She was nominated according to 73 criteria. Most of the respondents said that the Russian army is the strongest in the world.
The Ukrainian Armed Forces took sixth place. The US, China, Israel and South Korea took second, third, fourth and fifth place respectively. At the end of the list are the armies of Estonia, Singapore and Luxembourg.
US is the most powerful military power period.
You don't determine who has the most powerful military force by conducting a survey. What do average citizens know about military strength, tech, economy, and warfare? US has the best military tech, most war experience, best economy, bases everywhere, allies everywhere, and all the best military companies - Lockheed Martin, Raytheon Technologies, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, etc. - are in USA. All that would come in full force if WW3 happened.
Soldiers are selected according to the principles: friendly, cold-blooded, non-confrontational, executive, able to work in one team. Aggressive, nervous, conflicted are rejected at the stage of formation of the unit. Commanders try to select representatives of different ethnic groups in one unit so that the general consciousness is not the same, because extreme situations are different. the principle of military brotherhood (historical address in the Russian army "brother")
Video *"Soldiers of Great Russia",* one platoon: Russian soldiers in Ukraine (ethnic composition: ethnic Russians (Balto Slavs with Finno-Ugrians mixture), ethnic Ukrainians (Balto-Slavs with Turks mixture), Ethnic Tatars (Finno-Ugrians with Turks mixture), Ethnic Caucasians (Arabs with Turcs and Iranians mixture)) The song "Wait for me" *1QWCPhzSfm0*
Soldier after the action, a slight injury */shorts/I31SIWZzeLo*
@@Deezhan Rankings and polls don't matter. I will describe why below.
Publication of a military analyst in the UN research structure:
“Counting the number of units of military equipment is the most senseless task in existence.
So it is impossible to get an adequate assessment of the strength of the Army, because there are much more important factors than armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles, aircraft, and so on. This does not work.
Many still believe that victory in the coming war will be for those who have more high technology.
I hasten to disappoint - technology actually has an insignificant impact.
Money is also considered one of the myths - whoever is richer can afford to almost buy every person inside the enemy country. Alas, this is not so.
The main goal of any modern army is politics. Fulfillment of specific political tasks. There is no war for the sake of war, and victory is only politics.
Therefore, any war is also politics, just using more radical means to achieve the task.
Even when it comes to containing the aggressor country.
Many now think that the Russians have surrendered in Syria. I do not think so. Their commander-in-chief clearly outlined two tasks.
The first is to stabilize the legitimate government, the second is to create conditions to find a political compromise.
Note that the goal of the complete destruction of the opposition was not pursued here. In political language, this is - and there is a victory.
Both tasks were achieved and for this it was not necessary to completely destroy the forces of the second side.
Although they could wipe out resistance from the face of the earth, using a small part of their nuclear potential.
America is exactly the opposite. Of course, the United States has trained soldiers. There is also a technological advantage. Most likely, we are the first in the world in military technology.
Hence, the military potential is greater than that of any other country in the world. Everything would be fine, but it doesn't matter. In reality, things are completely different.
Consider World War II, where the US military literally did nothing. They won only the most shameful of victories, and those with very, very great difficulty.
Take the same Panama - there they simply did not see any resistance. And is this a win?
Go ahead. If I was ever asked to choose a military intervention, I would be reluctant to name Desert Storm.
The Iraqis were then expelled from Kuwait, however, they had to pay too high a price for this.
So what kind of assessment of the armed forces can we talk about? Yes, the Americans have the most advanced weapons, but comparing this with the real combat potential of Russia is simply pointless.
All these years they carried out combat missions with the least losses. What about the Americans? Achieved only a few political goals, keeping quiet about the rest. Expensive and technologically advanced is not equal to victory.
It is unlikely that even the Russians themselves will argue that for 10 years in Afghanistan, especially at the start of hostilities, they had absolutely no equipment.
But the Americans were already allocating $20 billion annually for the military operation.
But who actually turned out to be the most effective? Soviet troops managed to take control of the entire country during the day, and at night - the Afghans themselves. No fighters.
What happened to the US then? Kabul, control over which was weakening every now and then? At the same time, the Soviet people built many hospitals, dams, airports, roads there - they made people happier.
This is where I propose to stop.
I think that many adequate people are now able to independently draw a parallel between the real military potential and the availability of modern technologies, huge budgets.
You can argue all you want, but I consider Russia the most powerful country on the planet. Although their forces are not the largest, most technologically advanced, they are the most combat-ready."
@@Deezhan The crew of the Sarmat strategic missile system with heavy intercontinental ballistic missiles has taken up combat duty. The head of Roscosmos, Yuri Borisov, spoke about this during the Share Your Knowledge marathon on September 1.
The bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki are nothing compared to the size and destructive power of the Sarmat missile, which is approximately two thousand times greater than the shells used to carry out the bombings mentioned. The Russian missile is capable of wiping out large areas (more than 551 thousand square kilometers), roughly equivalent to the area of France, which this missile can reach in just three minutes. One Sarmat missile is guaranteed to destroy a state like Texas, and ten are guaranteed to destroy the United States entirely.
The deployment of the Sarmat missile system marked a new milestone: nowhere in the world is there an analogue of this weapon in terms of combat and operational characteristics.
These are also units that fly at hypersonic speed and are capable of bypassing American missile defense positions. At the same time, not a single supercomputer is capable of calculating the trajectory for American kinetic missile defense missiles so that they are capable of shooting down at least one Russian maneuvering warhead.
One of the most important features of this complex is its ability to strike through the North and South Poles, and travel at ultra-low altitude. It has a highly modernized radar and missile defense penetration mechanism. This means that after passing over South America, the warheads will enter the territory of the United States from the southern side, and then American air defense systems will be powerless to resist the Russian devil. A special feature of the terrifying rocket is its rather short stage (booster stage). That is, from the moment it is launched from the silo until it enters space, the rocket spends a minimum of time in the atmosphere, which makes it difficult for it to be intercepted by American and European missile defense systems, especially those located in Poland and Romania.
Thanks to the adoption of this missile system, Russia has significantly surpassed the United States in military potential.
“The adoption of the Sarmat has further widened the gap between Russia and the United States in the capabilities of their ground-based strategic missile forces, with the US ICBM arsenal currently the oldest and least sophisticated in the world, consisting of 1970-1970-era Minuteman III missiles. 's, which have undergone relatively few updates to their capabilities,” the observer notes.
"Sarmat" is a three-stage intercontinental rocket with liquid engines with a flight range of up to 18 thousand kilometers and a launch weight of 208 tons. Sarmat can carry up to ten large and 16 small warheads. The RS-28 Sarmat ICBM is capable of delivering a multiple warhead weighing up to 10 tons to any point in the world, both through the North and South Poles.
The RS-28 Sarmat ICBM will replace the world's most powerful silo-based strategic missile, the RS-20V Voevoda.
Earlier, on April 27, 2022, the head of the Roscosmos state corporation, Dmitry Rogozin, reported that Roscosmos was mass producing Sarmat intercontinental missiles; a total of 46 complexes were planned to be delivered to the troops.
The appearance of Sarmat in service shows Russia's ability to expand its nuclear arsenal even against the backdrop of imposed sanctions.
The United States has failed to develop weapons that Russia has long had. For the second year in a row, the Pentagon has missed the target date for fielding its first operational hypersonic weapon. Meanwhile, China and Russia have already deployed their new hypersonic systems capable of flying fast and at low altitude.
The Air Force also missed a major deadline last year, failing to field the new B-52-launched hypersonic ARRW missile by the end of fiscal year 2022 due to poor test results. Three failed tests of the ARRW launch vehicle under development derailed plans to start production of the rocket last year. On September 6, the United States canceled the key test due to problems discovered during pre-flight inspection.
The West is shocked by the growth rate of shell production in Russia, writes Do Rzeczy. And all this costs the Russians many times less. According to the Western press, Russia, despite the sanctions, not only increased the production of shells, but also exceeded its level until 2022. In terms of ammunition production, Moscow is 7 times greater than the West.
Estonian Defense Ministry spokesman Kusti Salma recently said that Russian ammunition production volumes are seven times greater than in the West, and production is cheaper for the Russians. According to him, while in a NATO country one 155 mm artillery shell costs 5-6 thousand dollars, Russia spends only 600 dollars on its production.
Wow Indonesia Top 13
BEST INDONESIA🇮🇩❤😊
Mantab...
Aneh Indonesia, Kalah sama Negara yang lebih kecil.
Menunggu UU hukum mati koruptor bsa 5 terkuat
@@uncle_sam077 emang knp aneh apa lu kurg otk
Russia aja banyak negara besar lain yg kalah sama negara kecil
@@Efaputri1hahaha wong tolol lapo diewangi iku 😂 seng penting isine kan gak perlu covere 🤣
Savaşta çoğu zaman az olanlar çok olanlara galip gelir. Bunu Müslüman Türkün karşısında çoğu düşman tattı. Selam olsun bütün Müslüman Turklere 🇹🇷☝️☝️
Here we go true Patriots turkey ko to the chat
Aleyküm selam 🇹🇷🐺
Разве бывают турки - христиане?
@@alexeyshelkoplyasov9901evet var
@@alexeyshelkoplyasov9901yes
Sangat keren videonya, menarik sekali 🇮🇩
How did you calculate? According to your data, Morocco 61, Belarus 60 and Bulgaria 59 should be placed in reverse order. And this is not the only mistake
Ровно такая же ошибка, как и русня до сих пор остается в топ 3. После полного разгрома регулярной армии нацистской рашки, уничтожения сотни тысяч мобилизированных и постоянном призыве зэков на войне (а это я молчу про зависимость от КНДР и КНР) - рашка точно не может быть на 2 месте до сих пор
Love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩
You also have love from the USA, Washington state, we are your friends forever 😊
Meu Brasil em 12 nada mal o segundo mais forte das Américas
🇧🇷💪
Brazil is unbreakable ❤🎉
We are friends 🇺🇲
Mas com o mesmo numero de soldados que a Colombia que tem uma populacao infinitamente menor do que a populacao do Brasil, isso eh vergonha.
@@goldknightshaka7621 Colômbia vive em guerra com os cartéis de droga e com vários problemas na fronteira com a Venezuela.Brasil só a polícia da conta do crime embora alguns governantes sejam convíctos com a criminalidade.E Brasil não tem problemas com nenhum vizinho,mantem na ativa só o necessario e com uma reserva de quase 3 milhões de reservistas,quase 3 vezes mais do que o triplo de toda américa do sul juntas...A Força do Brasil é descomunal...
@@isurasachinthanaNão. Não samos amigos vocês já passaram a perna na gente várias vezes e ainda financiaram ditaditaduras.
@@alanalansatos2114 ele é só um civil, não está a par da situação, e também você esqueceu de mencionar que quando a Argentina acionou o acordo com os EUA para defender as maldivas os EUA cagaram e deixaram eles lutarem sozinhos, o Brasil que segurou alguns caças dos britânicos mas isso porque invadiram nosso espaço aéreo.
Indonesia is the number one in Southeast Asia.
1. Beautiful country🇮🇩🇮🇩
2. Strong Country🇮🇩🇮🇩
3. And the 4th strong economic country 2045🇮🇩🇮🇩
Lol no
Also the worst Asian country for woman. Muslim country, has terrorists. And woman has fewer rights than elsewhere
إندونيسيا اقوى دوله إسلامية
@@user-hu8lp7qz8flari ke agama owalla kotak
Cuma rakyatnya aja rada lelet 8:19 dan males😂
love from Bangladesh ❤
I love Indonesia. no 13❤️
@@Roadrage62 pleeeerrrr😂
@@Roadrage62😂
@@Roadrage62Terserah anda, kami tidak peduli
🇹🇷 Ekonomi iyi olsa ilk 5’e girebilirdi Türkiye
Not contesting your opinions bcz I think you did a great job but I still feel like you over rated the USA ......
Well the statistics say US 😜 just cry in the river
@@wordmonster448 расскажи статистику боевикам Хамас)твоя Сша не может пол года победить,а афганистан выгнал Сша))на украине Сша 3 года ничего не может сделать)просит оружие у Эквадора))😄😄😄
@@MAD_BEAR2090You do realize that both Afghanistan and Iraq were conquered in just a month?
@@defintity_9951завоеваны?Бравые американские парни сидели на укреплённых базах и охраняли только себя.А потом их пинком под сраку отправили восвояси.Повторили "подвиг" своих дедов во Вьетнаме.А те,в свою очередь,"победу" в Арденнах.
Давай уже будем объективны по отношению к американской армии.Война-это не то,что показывает Голливуд.На самом деле все страшнее и прозаичнее и англосаксы в этом смысле "жидковаты" будут.
INDONESIA...❤
How did they come up with these rankings? The defense budgets aren’t ranked in order, and nothing troop numbers are in order. I always think the lowest ones are the coolest who cares about the best they are always best by default. This has Iceland
These rankings are of global firepower index which ranks all the 145 countries in military strength according to manpower, landpower, airpower, naval power, financials, labour force strength and geography and logistics and you can't say anything according to their ranking like this only first get information about it
@@shalinikumari297ahhhh that’s why Canada isn’t #1 They don’t know what isn’t reported
What bro??check properly,, they don't know less than you.
@@zayeemsavage6488 Well Iceland was no defense budget
Одна Россия противостоит вам всем
INDONESIA🇮🇩❤❤
Indo Bãi phân🦴
@@changngoc4855hahaha...Negara kamu teringgal dari Indonesia,lalu kau marah,kamu lucu😂
name of music? please
India 🇮🇳 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Brasil 🇧🇷 sempre surpreendendo!
No puedo creer que turkia, italia, sur korea, argentina sean mas fuertes que brasil México y colombia ?😂😂😂
Negativamente né ?
@@user-lu7np8ss5e Turquia, Coreia do Sul e Itália são mesmo mais fortes que o Brasil. Porém o Brasil não tem nenhum inimigo externo. E está no continente mais pacífico do mundo. Não tem necessidade de se armar mais do que já está.
@@Cortex606 pues entonces salte de tu brasil por que eres anti patriota hermano.
@@LargadoBSB mais forte do que brasil? Hermano En que? Te apuesto que solo mi pais colombia puede reventar korea del sur en dos semanas , pues en 1950 los defendimos de korea del norte en la chamada "guerra de korea". Ahora brasil fue la que invadio italia en 1943 creo yo y eliminaron a Mussolini. No podeos desprestigiar nuestras naciones. Tenemos que unirnos en contra de estas ""potencias""
Hey bro in your video of countries with most mosque's when the new Afghanistan flag came it didn't have the shahadat in it just the plain white flag please add it ❤
indias defence budget is 80.1 billion
❤ my Bangladesh 🇧🇩
Совершенно необъективно, считать по бюджету, ну все мы знаем как воруют в США именно на обороне, тратят триллионы на самолёты которые не летаю, корабли которые не плавают. Армия США раздута, но когда они воевали ? Совершенно не понятно как тут считали, но понял одно, автор канала очень любит Америку.
Least salty Ruski:
How long is it?
India 🇮🇳🇮🇳
Indonesia❤🇲🇨
Indonesia 🇮🇩💞💞💞💞
I am really proud of you my country and this is only in 2023 and in 2024 we will be among the 20 or 15 most powerful countries in the world I love you my country🇩🇿🇩🇿🇩🇿❤️
ага, придурки верили, но доктор прописал....
30 billion for Ukraine? Seriously, is not their money, USA and Europe just gave to them🤦♂️
Завидуй молча
@@A_l_e_x_UKR Чему завидовать? Тому, что и Россия, и Украина нищие?😂
Если думал, что я русский, то не обижайся, но я в этой войне хоть и не за Россию, но точно так же не за Украину...Меня бесит то, что моя страна тоже вам помогла отправив более 100к тонн нефти, абсолютно бесплатно, в то время когда народ нуждается в высокой зарплате.
А Украина ни хрена не сделала, когда мы воевали
@@A_l_e_x_UKR Неблагодарные вы, вот и все
Yes, Ukraine is trash, Russia will destroy them, don't worry, I'm glad most Americans disagree with this sending aid to Ukraine, and I'm not even American.
@@igroman9466 в чём то ты прав
Горжусь с КЫРГЫЗСТАНОМ.🇰🇬
И чем же тут гордиться😂😂😂
что у вас армия на 107 месте???
@@user-dv4fj3jn5v это за 2 года мы 107 месте... пройдёт 5 или 10 лет, тоже будем 40 или 50 месте.
монголи алга😅
@@user-ee7lr2lk1isaya mendoakan yang terbaik untuk negara kalian(Kyrgyzstan) salam hangat dari Indonesia☺
Defense budget doesn't mean power.
For example a very large part of US's defense budget goes on maintaining the military bases.
Also building military aircraft and tanks and arms is more expensive in US and UK compared to Russia or China.
UD have more aircraft than Russia and China combined anyway
А у России танков больше
@@user-jf5is3hw7v очень бы хотел посмотреть как Россия будет воевать на танках с государством за океаном у которого лучше авиация и флот
@@wiyiwiyiwiyiwiyiwwiyiwiyiw1274"Посейдон" в помощь
@@wiyiwiyiwiyiwiyiwwiyiwiyiw1274, а зачем России воевать с государством за океаном с помощью наземной техники? Ты настолько глуп ? То есть ты считаешь что с 50ых прошлого века годов русские и амеры пугали друг друга ЯО, а в 21 веке в штыковую пойдут? Наркоман шоле ? Конфликт с полосатым матрасом это ядерная война, удары ракетами и запуски посейдонов с подлодок, ну, а проецировать силу в небольшие страны которые находятся на другом конце земли как это делают пиндосы России не нужно.
When u have the bombe u should be before anyone else country
And when you have it, it's not possible to value any country who have it
For exemple with her nuke Pakistan is able as hé wish to smash down india but also china or even usa
The nuke change all the references about number Time money or else than Can use to help an army in a War
3:50اليمن 🇾🇪🇾🇪🇾🇪🇾🇪
India proud🇮🇳🇮🇳
In fact, war proves who is stronger, not numbers
Nice cover
Pas compris le système de classement. Je vois :
en 51 la Finlande avec
- 166 avions,
- 5368 véhicules,
- 24 000 soldats,
- 246 bateaux.
Et en 50 le Danemark avec
- 115 avions,
- 4024 véhicules,
- 16 000 soldats,
- 74 bateaux.
Pas très logique ça...
아시아 일본, 중국, 러시아.. 강국사이에 껴있는 우리나라 대한민국.. 어느 지표를 봐도 그 강력한 국가들 사이에 껴서 너무 힘들다
그래서 우린 일본과 협력해야됨
바로 위에선 북한이 개지랄
@@user-sw3ie3no4jㅇㅇ
장학생??@@user-sw3ie3no4j
하하하하하하하하
BRASIL AINDA VAI ESTA NO TOP 10 ❤
Verdade espero que ele contínua avançado.
Давно ждал такого видео
4) India 🇮🇳❤️💕💖
Dirgahayu Republik Indonesia
Que orgulho tenho do meu país. Obrigada Deus, por ter nascido no Brasil!
I love Indonesia ❤
Indaneziya 99% musulmon
لو پڭۇ ۇەبن ۇڭۇيىىى ەرلق
we love indonesia to from Egypt
نم aisenodni 🇲🇨
Дпъопефда
Proud to be human ❤❤❤❤❤
😂😂😂😂😂😂
These brain dead comments…
Your ranking is awful 😀
Qatar army more powerful than Cuba, Ireland, Austria, Jordan and Belgium armies
My God how much they’re paying you to say that
Egypt 🇪🇬 🇪🇬 🇪🇬 🇪🇬
Why do you like to not add Malawi but u put all other countries 😣😓😢😭
Top 12 in the world and top 1 in Latin America 🥵🇧🇷
🇮🇳 top 4th💪🚩
@@U0_Alive Greetings from Brazil to India 🇧🇷🤝🇮🇳
7th in world 1st in islamic countries🇵🇰❤️
@@hamdan1003 Omg I really like Pakistan and I'm a big fan of islamics countries. Hope to visit it soon 😃
@@patriabrasilis most welcome❤️❤️must visit Islamabad and northern areas✨
❤❤❤
Рейтинг, как я понимаю во главу угла ставит размер бюджета.
Поэтому КНДР, которая может разбомбить в пыль Японию, тут как бы не участвует.
6:37 so proud of 🇩🇿 🥲❤️
🇵🇰❤️🇩🇿
Orgulho enorme do meu Brasil
Не пойму сильные в чем
Если по финансовым затратам то согласен но никак не по силе
По силе Россия на 1 месте, а Беларусь на 10. Вроде как раз 6 месяцев назад были опубликованы данные)
I love my india ❤❤❤
🤢🤢🤮
Tu país no me cae bien INDIO PIRIBOO
😂😂😂👉👌
@@lokidoli3766🤢🤢🤮🫵🫵
Frindafan 😂😂😂
America #1 like always, greatest country in the history of the world. We’ll become a lot stronger this November.🇺🇸
1:42 Laos 🇱🇦🇱🇦🇱🇦 to even army Laos will have small size but I Well proud
Algérie 🇩🇿🇩🇿✌️✌️❣️
La 5ème place du Royaume-Uni semble exagérée, de même que la nôtre, 9ème place ?? En termes militaire, diplomatique, maritime et nucléaire, en effet, nous sommes juste devant eux. Donc, il convient de rectifier : France : 5ème and UK : 6ème.
The most powerful in the world number 4 India , now we are very strong 💪💪💪
وأنا أفتخر بالسعودية 🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦٠
🇹🇷Turkey
⚜️🇺🇿♥️🇹🇷 | 🇦🇿🇰🇿🇹🇲🇰🇬🇹🇯⚜️ YASHASIN TURKIY TILLI MAMLAKATLAR!!!
🇺🇿Uzbekistan
الله اكبر!!!
peace at home peace in the world - MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK
TÜRKİYE
Очень странное ранжирование. Некоторые государства расположены в рейтинге совершенно неверно, КНДР например.
Kyrgyzstan ❤1 Alga
Azerbaijan❤
👎👎👎🇦🇿🐑🇦🇿🐑🇦🇿🐑🇦🇿🐑🇦🇿🐑🤣🤣🤣😝😝😝 .
Artsakh ( Karabakh ) In Armenia 🇦🇲☦️🇦🇲
@@a.s.944😂😂 Karabakh is Azerbaijan 🇦🇿.!
@@cavadzhadehезжай туда жить. Если сможешь
@@user-yj7lw5wx5x Я уже живу там.
In my opinion, the USA is in first place and Israel is in second place, followed by China, Great Britain, India and then Russia
Там атомное оружие считали, если по флоту считать, то скоро 1th China
😂😂😂сказочник
2:29 'mongolia ranks higher than cameroon' because it has MORE TANKS. While mongolia has FEWER armies,jets n 'if thats ship'. n also defence budget
Украина до сих пор считается суверенным государством или это формальность?
Откуда бы там 17-ое место при отсутствии даже собственного плохенького государственного бюджета.
Могло бы быть образование государства, если бы власть не захватили "евроинтеграторы" (воры-коррупционеры).
Теперь до Сувалковского коридора- одна Россия. Остальные формальности- позже.
В России и армии-то толком не было до последнего времени из-за наличия более пяти тысяч ядерных боеголовок. Пришлось создавать по ходу конфликта воинские подразделения, но это никакого отношения к "мощности" не имеет.
Вся "мощность" России была, есть и будет в том, что главные провокаторы конфликтов в мире (США и Англия) точно знают о своём гарантированом уничтожении в случае прямого конфликта с Россией.
И...можно хоть зубы стереть до основания.
Ты хоть внимательней смотри. Украина не17, а 15. И бюджет есть. И суверенитет и независимость. Ты бреда понаписывал какого то. Россия за три дня Киев берёт уже полтора года, медленно, но уверенно теряя то, что захватила внезапно своим блицкригом. Украина же не минировала всё всплошную как рашка.
@@segaost про три дня как раз сказал Американский генерал три раза переслушал в оригенале звали его Милли, так что первоисточник этого американец, а то что вам там в уши делают это сугубо ваши личные проблемы. кстати рекомендую найти его полную цитату.
🇷🇺👉💩
@@thetruthinthemiddle почему нам вливают? Это русским вливают пропагандоны типа соловьёва и скабеевой. Ведь если то, что ты говоришь, правда, то почему они это повторяли не однократно по российским передачам.
Без помощи Запада украина за три дня Гитлер и Бендера капут
Proud to be an American! 🇺🇸… Even Death Will Not Do Us Part because the God of Abraham Isaac Jacob and Yeshua!!!
Clown 🤡🤡🤡
Советую тебе посмотреть обновление статистики,Гугл тебе в помощь пендос
You probably think Jesus spoke English 😂
@@erjonhashanii3542 Aramaic get your facts right buddy
@itisfixable3919 What's the word for God in aramaic?
One thing is for sure... if any alien invades, they're going to find 145 countries literally armed to their teeth.
Tapi semua itu gak ada apa-apanya tanpa pertolongan dari Alloh Subhannahu wa Taala
2:51 Defence budget of Armenia 🇦🇲 1,5 billion dollars $ dont 632 million. Soldiers of Armenia 55000 + 25000(Soldiers of Nagorno-Karabakh)=75000 active personnel ✊🏿🇦🇲
Оно помогло?
🇦🇿 ❤🇵🇰
@@arandomguy007 🇦🇲🇮🇳>🇵🇰🇦🇿
Bro, Serbia has no sea💀
It has Danube, bro
Самые сильные страны Китай Россия.
@@user-wy6wf3kx5s😅😅😅😅
내륙국가라 해도 해군이 있기도 합니다. 예를 들어 볼리비아.
다시 과거의 해양국가로 언젠가 갈 수있을것이라는 희망으로 또 그 작은 군함은 호수에 정박해 언젠가 사용할 날을 꿈꾸고 있기도 하죠.
So . .? Wats your problem dude if NO sea .?…. This video isn’t about the seas ….. it’s about powerful COUNTRIES dude , so shut tfu