This is one of the very best spotting scope appraisals I have seen on UA-cam. 99% of these reviews or appraisals leave out important info and are often technically incorrect. Optics is a difficult subject, at a fundamental level it is all math. This is the reason most reviewers get the important stuff wrong as they don't understand it. If you are not an optical designer, even those that work in the industry all their lives never really understand optics properly. Nearly all optical jingo is pure marketing, and it is refreshing to hear someone avoid the pitfalls and explain properly to their market consumers using "normal" language. One thing I am glad you didn't talk about is the dreaded "Twilight factor", a term often used in the hunting and birding market. It is mathematical nonsense even though it has been used by top manufacturers for many decades. Good to hear you suggesting that even in lower light, a good quality optic can show lots of detail at higher magnifications. For many decades this point has always been refuted, that's because (as you hinted) all it takes is a high quality optic, and the performance makes a mockery of the marketing used for cheaper poorer scopes. Well done. Many years ago, I used to supply and build instruments, including Optolyth. I would be interested to hear whether you have looked at their draw-tube scopes and how they compare to the fixed length more popular models. I haven't seen a modern Optolyth draw scope, not since the 90s. Well done, you are a very good presenter.
excellent information, I did experience many of the problems he mentioned. After watching the whole video I understood why I was having all these issues with my current scope. I returned my latest purchased scope and decided to purchase the little Celestron Hummingbird 9-27 x 56mm he recommended. I returned a 22 - 60x times scope, nowI am very happy with his recommendation. Thank you very much Sir!
Excellent video on spotting scopes. Just some wisdom, buy the best you can afford. Meaning, save for the best. I use vortex razor HD and they are excellent. Love them! Would I like Swarovski? Heck yes! But for me razor HDs are the perfect price for how much I hunt but one day I can decide to trade up. There is value in higher end optics. Diamondbacks are purpose-full but trade up value will be lost. Save your money and get the best. There is a line to where trade in value is lost. Leupold’s highest end, vortex razors, zeiss’s higher end line…etc. If you can’t afford Swarovski get zeiss, can’t afford zeiss get vortex or Leupold, and so on. Do some research. I recently bought a zeiss rifle scope and the quality is above vortex or Leupold; but the all out warranty isn’t the same. Zeiss will fix the scope and there is a value there. Not all brands are gonna come with a full guarantee advertised but I can guarantee if you damage your Swarovski; they are going to fix it in some form or fashion. Just the cost of doing business. See the value it that. 10x42 or something similar size is perfect for chest binos. Plus, they are even better glassing on a tripod. Much more stability equals more clear picture. Spotting scope vs larger binoculars: spotting scopes are tough to glass out of for a long time. I suggest using 15x56 binoculars or something similar size. Much more relaxing to long glassing sessions. Plus, spend the extra money on a great tripod. Vortex, Leupold, and other manufacturers make excellent tripods with excellent fluid heads to compliment your glass. The system makes for a great glassing experience which in turn finds you more game in the field. 👍🏻😃 just my opinion. That’s the way I wish I would have done it before spending all the monies.
This is the first video of yours I've ever watched and I'm subscribing based solely on this. Nice to hear someone that knows his stuff and avoids all the theatrics in his videos. Everyone's different, but yours has just enough humor in it to suit me. Nice job!
I second Herb's opinion! Thank you so very much for your straight, honest thoughts. You have at least 2 new subscribers now. Can't wait to binge watch the rest of ur videos. Keep up the great work!
i shoot a lot of surf photos and video using a scope(digiscoping). Because it involves moving targets/action ,it is critical to use a straight scope , mounted to a good tripod, so that you can track the surfer on the smart phone screen as he moves along the wave . They make a variety of good adaptors that securely attach the smart phone to the end of the scope. You will be amazed at the quality of the photos using this system . The cameras that are being incorporated into the current crop of smart phones are really high quality. I use a 12x 55mm monoscope when shooting distances of 80 yards or less and a 20-60 60mm spotting scope to shoot from greater distances.
I hear you Ron! The last time I made a mistake was when I thought I’d made one! But that darned cape keeps giving me away as it flaps in the breezes in the field.
Ron, This is an excellent treatment on spotting scopes. And, this is from a scientist who knows his optics. You are right. The killer to sharp images is color fringing. That is why low dispersion glass is vital. Next, the larger the objective lens, the sharper the image should be, if the optics is high quality. A higher magnification on a small diameter objective will just magnify a fuzzy image. A larger objective helps with the exit pupil as well. You should think about a video on just the tripod itself. And a treatment of steadying a scope without a tripod (more than you did here). Here, a sturdy sock with polypropylene pellets (find at a fabric store) as a bean bag is useful. That can also be used to steady the rifle too. Most good tripods can change out the head. Consider a ball joint head; very fast to set up. Also, people may consider buying more than one spotting scope, to fit their needs. Say, one for the range, and one for the backpack. Again, excellent work. I like your dog.
You have a great way of presenting the information. My favorite tip (there were MANY), but my favorite was the beanbag on the open car window trick! Thanks for putting this out there Ron.
Ron Spomer name has always been synonymous with the outdoors. Recently discovered Ron Spomer's excellent UA-cam videos. Very informative. Well spoken. Better than Netflix !
I purchased this a few years ago: Pentax 20-60x80mm PF-80ED Angle ED Spotting Scope, Waterproof, works as well as any other spotting scope with the large primary objective. The 100ED is better but much heaver.
That's a very informative briefing. Learned more on the subject in these few minutes than to sum total of what I knew about spotting scopes, or lenses in general, for that matter. Much obliged! Like Like Like!
For bright sunny days, you can friction fit circular polar lens filter (for cameras) into the rubber armor on a scope. When you squeeze a polarizer filter into the front of the scope it'll cut down on the amount of light passing through the glass. It's good for viewing into the sky, when you're tracking a bird in the sky.
Thank you! I love seeing well spoken outdoor enthusiasts, that isn't all "tacticool" "'merica" types. Those guys don't bother me, I lean that way some times. But that looks bad tot those nonhunter types. Great information, very through, without being overly technical.
Very well presented and explained. I’m no expert but I’ve always said regarding all optical equipment as a rule of thumb ‘Buy cheap,buy low magnification with large objective lens diameter - Buy expensive and the worlds your oyster’ Remember though like all things it’s [arguably] a case of diminishing returns ie. a scope costing double may be twice as good but one ten times the price probably isn’t ten times as good. Lastly to quote Scotty from Star Trek “You canae change the laws of physics”
Great video. I love spotting scopes. Anything that brings the stars and planets closer gives me a spiritual feeling I can't put into words, and keeps me in this crazy world.😁
If anybody is looking at that Celestron Hummingbird be careful, there are 2 versions of it Micro and ED. ED is more expensive but remember first point from this video about ED glass.
The Viper HD 10x42 bins at £475 are at the fringe of the mid way before you jump into the £1000 range. The glassware is great, and the super sharp image is like viewing your object in 3D. It cuts it out!
Ron, This is probably the most informative tutorial on spotting scopes I have seen. Your explanation on going over 40 power is spot on(no pun intended). And your advice on how much to spend. I have a Leupold 20-40 that is crystal clear$$$. I have a Vanguard that is sup par$. P.S. - Love the comment on anti hunting !!!
HD is High Dispersion glass, and ED is Extra Dispersion glass. Fluorite optics are even more expensive than HD or ED. Another issue is purging and gas charging -- typically Argon -- which prevents any fogging of the internal surfaces. For rugged use like banging around on the rocks, the seals can be compromised and the gas charge lost. Be sure to get padded protection to protect the scopes!
Despite the lame jokes--this was the best, most useful video I've found to date. Thank you for the information that other videos, particularly those put out by optic manufacturers, never bothered to include.
RE: protect the objective with a polarizing filter I would also recommend, if your scope comes with a filter thread on the objective, to buy a 'polarizing filter'. This filter protects the way more expensive objective lens and improves the viewing. On my Leica Televid 82 it means that the sun cap can't be extended anymore ... but I don't miss it at all and am way more confident viewing in all weather conditions and in vegetation ... nothing will be able to damage the primary lens. Also great for viewing stuff under water since it removes glare. The image is like watching through a polaroid sunglasses but less severe. It has no disadvantages in my experience.
Thanks for the tip, Tim. The disadvantage with a polarizing filter is 1 to 2 stops of light lost. Another option for protecting the scope's objective lens that does not reduce light "throughput" is a simple UV Haze filter. As suggested, it reduces Ultraviolet haze in the atmosphere to increase color saturation.
Thanks for explaining.I am Dutch, now in Tuscany, and I had a german friend here, who in the war and later lived and worked in East Germany ad administrator/bookkeeper for Leica. I had a M3 for a long time. = he explained how working 7 days a week, every day he had to take all the handwritten notes from 1 of the 7 "bosses" of more than a 100 technicians (1000 total) , who had to cut slices of a big natural Christal of 2 x 1 x 0,5 meters, that they cut out of the mountain in the west of germany (1 every 3 years). = They needed according the fractional light passing through decide how to cut it and make lenses out of it. = Leica, who else! alex = I did not ask about the income of those poor people ...
One thing that you didn't go into is the advantages of having a spotting scope that incudes a MOA or MilDot reticle. A great advantage to range your target with the bigger scope or if you are shooting with a spotter, they can help you by calling wind and corrections after your shots.
Thank you for your video. Love ur corny humor.....buying a used spotting scope to go look at the cranes in Nebraska.....you've brought up several really good points that I didn't think of......
Awesome video, Ron, I am searching for a optic to obverse target for long distance rifle shooting, was debating on getting an binocular or spotting scope. This video teaches me a lot of information. Thanks again.
What I found useful is to buy a cell phone camera adapter mount that clamp on to the eye piece. There are plenty of them on amazon. I use a dedicated cellphone attached to the mount ant the scope. The pros are: - The phone will focus automatically, so there is some tolerance on non-accurate focus. - Adapt to environment, esp for dawn and low light situation. - You can zoom further on your phone to get 100x+ power. - Good for me since I have frame glass. No need to hunt for the pupil. - Wide viewing angle. Can share the view with others. - If you want, you can take pictures or videos. I use it for my target spotting. Cons: - Tricky to setup. Lots of moving parts if you get a universal mount. That is why I used a dedicated phone. Set and not taking off. - Need a battery pack if you want to spot for extended amount of time. - light from the phone screen might not be good for hunting or night situation.
Great video! I sell high end optics for a living, so I’m very invested in this world. I know you touched on it at the end, but it can’t be stressed enough how important quality is. A Swaro ATX 65 will mop the floor with most 80-100mm scopes out there. I use car analogies a lot. Just because two engines have the same displacement, doesn’t mean they perform the same. On that same note, a high displacement engine from forty years ago doesn’t have the efficiency of an engine with a quarter of its displacement made today. You get a lot more “Horsepower/cubic inch”. As much as I love old American Muscle Cars...the fact remains that an AWD Subaru made today will outperform almost any vintage car in almost every way...save for aesthetic (which itself is subjective). What’s not subjective is the fact that higher quality and enhanced technology will get more of it’s available horsepower to the ground, i.e. light to the eye. Thanks for the excellent video on a subject near and dear!
Actors look like the know what they're doing, though most don't. Maybe don't judge a book by it's cover.... In this instance, Ron provided an excellent tutorial.
Sir..that was some great must know very useful info on SS when buying one..especially if someone like me who will buy this once in lifetime and can't invest again or upgrade..by the way u have great way of explaining things..and those u have recommended are really desirable !
Very well thought out and presented. Did not know abt changing the eye piece. Like your straight forward, lots of detail, style. Very easy and enjoyable to watch. Thanks.
well i have been around long time . And all my maybe ones turned into gifts . So i have all Swarovski 8x32 15x50 and ATS 20x60 . they are all i need the 15x50 gets the most use
First, Ron did an excellent job explaining the key components and what to look for. I do think Ron needs 10 Things to Consider, though. The most important consideration isn't the scope itself, it's the intended use. Spending $3500 on a Swarovski 20-60 x 80 is likely not your best choice if you're thru hiking or backpack hunting for days/miles, for most people. A small, lightweight scope may not be the best choice for someone who only cares about long range target shooting. IMHO, your primary application is the 1st Consideration. Everything else....follows. Seems obvious, but unfortunately, I've seen way too many buy the wrong scope because they skip this step. Once you've thought about your intended use, then research with the knowledge Ron has clearly provided.
Good video. Thanks Ron. Biggest issues with prismatic telescopes, going back to 1854 when Ignazio Porro started making and selling his telescopes in Paris, are: Short eye relief and a small eye box. Ilya Koshkin, aka Dark Lord of Optics, recently advised that spotting telescopes with mirrors instead of prisms have longer eye relief and larger eye boxes. The potential problem for most of us is that he was looking through a Hensoldt optic and I have yet to find any useful reviews of the cheaper products offered by Bushnell, etc. NB If you are going to buy one of those modular spotting telescopes, check that the manufacturer coats the internal sidewalls with a special charged coating to attract any dust that gets inside the optic (in order to keep it off the optical elements). Companies like Schmidt and Bender introduced such coatings on their sighting telescopes because dust specks can easily get caught on glass reticles (which is one reason why wire reticles are still popular on second focal plane scopes).
I was looking for a spotter; I already owned Vortex Razor 22-28x65mm. It did okay the first 1.5 years of ownership but with aging eyes (69). I needed something with better glass, so was TRACT Optics spotter 27-55x80mm. I already own a TRACT Toric rifle scope 4-20x50mm30mmtube. I knew about the quality of Tract optics having the company's rifle scope.
The Swarovski spotting scopes are not really proprietary, they should have an Arca-Swiss compatible mounting foot (and their tripod heads are also Arca-Swiss compatible). At least the newer ones do have that feature. So you should be able to mount any Arca-Swiss plates/heads to their equipment.
A problem I've encountered with spotting scopes is the (generally) very short eye relief. To use most scopes, I have to remove my headphones and eyeglasses, then get close enough to the eyepiece that I often touch it and move the scope.....effectively eliminating any convenience or functionality. Why can't the eye relief be inches, as in rifle scopes, rather than just a few millimeters?
Great job Ron. Your common sense approach is always refreshing. I also like, and believe as well, buy once, cry once. Buy the best you can afford, then get a little bit better. Let's just cut to the chase though, BUY THE SWAROVSKI ! Period. End of discussion.
This is one of the very best spotting scope appraisals I have seen on UA-cam. 99% of these reviews or appraisals leave out important info and are often technically incorrect. Optics is a difficult subject, at a fundamental level it is all math. This is the reason most reviewers get the important stuff wrong as they don't understand it. If you are not an optical designer, even those that work in the industry all their lives never really understand optics properly. Nearly all optical jingo is pure marketing, and it is refreshing to hear someone avoid the pitfalls and explain properly to their market consumers using "normal" language. One thing I am glad you didn't talk about is the dreaded "Twilight factor", a term often used in the hunting and birding market. It is mathematical nonsense even though it has been used by top manufacturers for many decades. Good to hear you suggesting that even in lower light, a good quality optic can show lots of detail at higher magnifications. For many decades this point has always been refuted, that's because (as you hinted) all it takes is a high quality optic, and the performance makes a mockery of the marketing used for cheaper poorer scopes. Well done. Many years ago, I used to supply and build instruments, including Optolyth. I would be interested to hear whether you have looked at their draw-tube scopes and how they compare to the fixed length more popular models. I haven't seen a modern Optolyth draw scope, not since the 90s. Well done, you are a very good presenter.
This is by far the Best Tutorial on spotting scopes, thanks Ron!
Thank you Johannes.
That has to be the best tutorial for any optical equipment, and explained in a very easy to understand way.
@@RonSpomerOutdoors the Nipon 25x125x92 is a awesome scope too for the money powerful nitrogen purged
Although I’m a fairly successful salesman…
Ron kicks my azzzz !!!
@@RonSpomerOutdoors The Alaskan Guide Guy and this Optics data are your 2 best Videos
This is like a masterclass in spotting scopes. I like the science you are teaching about this.
excellent information, I did experience many of the problems he mentioned. After watching the whole video I understood why I was having all these issues with my current scope. I returned my latest purchased scope and decided to purchase the little Celestron Hummingbird 9-27 x 56mm he recommended. I returned a 22 - 60x times scope, nowI am very happy with his recommendation. Thank you very much Sir!
Excellent video on spotting scopes. Just some wisdom, buy the best you can afford. Meaning, save for the best. I use vortex razor HD and they are excellent. Love them! Would I like Swarovski? Heck yes! But for me razor HDs are the perfect price for how much I hunt but one day I can decide to trade up. There is value in higher end optics. Diamondbacks are purpose-full but trade up value will be lost. Save your money and get the best. There is a line to where trade in value is lost. Leupold’s highest end, vortex razors, zeiss’s higher end line…etc. If you can’t afford Swarovski get zeiss, can’t afford zeiss get vortex or Leupold, and so on. Do some research. I recently bought a zeiss rifle scope and the quality is above vortex or Leupold; but the all out warranty isn’t the same. Zeiss will fix the scope and there is a value there. Not all brands are gonna come with a full guarantee advertised but I can guarantee if you damage your Swarovski; they are going to fix it in some form or fashion. Just the cost of doing business. See the value it that. 10x42 or something similar size is perfect for chest binos. Plus, they are even better glassing on a tripod. Much more stability equals more clear picture.
Spotting scope vs larger binoculars: spotting scopes are tough to glass out of for a long time. I suggest using 15x56 binoculars or something similar size. Much more relaxing to long glassing sessions. Plus, spend the extra money on a great tripod. Vortex, Leupold, and other manufacturers make excellent tripods with excellent fluid heads to compliment your glass. The system makes for a great glassing experience which in turn finds you more game in the field. 👍🏻😃 just my opinion. That’s the way I wish I would have done it before spending all the monies.
This is the first video of yours I've ever watched and I'm subscribing based solely on this. Nice to hear someone that knows his stuff and avoids all the theatrics in his videos. Everyone's different, but yours has just enough humor in it to suit me. Nice job!
Thank you Herb.
I second Herb's opinion! Thank you so very much for your straight, honest thoughts. You have at least 2 new subscribers now. Can't wait to binge watch the rest of ur videos. Keep up the great work!
Ditto, this guy really knows his stuff.
Learned more in 20m than days browsing UA-cam for scope reviews. You Sir earned a new subscriber.
i shoot a lot of surf photos and video using a scope(digiscoping). Because it involves moving targets/action ,it is critical to use a straight scope , mounted to a good tripod, so that you can track the surfer on the smart phone screen as he moves along the wave . They make a variety of good adaptors that securely attach the smart phone to the end of the scope. You will be amazed at the quality of the photos using this system . The cameras that are being incorporated into the current crop of smart phones are really high quality. I use a 12x 55mm monoscope when shooting distances of 80 yards or less and a 20-60 60mm spotting scope to shoot from greater distances.
I hear you Ron! The last time I made a mistake was when I thought I’d made one! But that darned cape keeps giving me away as it flaps in the breezes in the field.
ua-cam.com/channels/rKJ5aVast8tXtS-qRGL51w.html
choose binoculars
i love the way you made all the spotting scope mumbo jumbo so simple and interesting to understand!
Ron, This is an excellent treatment on spotting scopes. And, this is from a scientist who knows his optics.
You are right. The killer to sharp images is color fringing. That is why low dispersion glass is vital.
Next, the larger the objective lens, the sharper the image should be, if the optics is high quality. A higher magnification on a small diameter objective will just magnify a fuzzy image. A larger objective helps with the exit pupil as well.
You should think about a video on just the tripod itself. And a treatment of steadying a scope without a tripod (more than you did here). Here, a sturdy sock with polypropylene pellets (find at a fabric store) as a bean bag is useful. That can also be used to steady the rifle too. Most good tripods can change out the head. Consider a ball joint head; very fast to set up.
Also, people may consider buying more than one spotting scope, to fit their needs. Say, one for the range, and one for the backpack.
Again, excellent work. I like your dog.
Thanks for the confirmation, John, and the additional info. I did not know one could buy polypro pellets at fabric stores!
Thanks, straight talking no nonsense advise, much appreciated
You have a great way of presenting the information. My favorite tip (there were MANY), but my favorite was the beanbag on the open car window trick! Thanks for putting this out there Ron.
Ron Spomer name has always been synonymous with the outdoors. Recently discovered Ron Spomer's excellent UA-cam videos. Very informative. Well spoken. Better than Netflix !
Always enjoy your videos Mr Spomer. You say it like it is and in plain language we can all understand. Keep up the great work.
I purchased this a few years ago: Pentax 20-60x80mm PF-80ED Angle ED Spotting Scope, Waterproof, works as well as any other spotting scope with the large primary objective. The 100ED is better but much heaver.
Videos don't get much better than that. Great job! Thanks!
Thank you, Bowhunt 99.
That's a very informative briefing. Learned more on the subject in these few minutes than to sum total of what I knew about spotting scopes, or lenses in general, for that matter. Much obliged! Like Like Like!
Thank you Jean.
For bright sunny days, you can friction fit circular polar lens filter (for cameras) into the rubber armor on a scope. When you squeeze a polarizer filter into the front of the scope it'll cut down on the amount of light passing through the glass. It's good for viewing into the sky, when you're tracking a bird in the sky.
Thank you! I love seeing well spoken outdoor enthusiasts, that isn't all "tacticool" "'merica" types. Those guys don't bother me, I lean that way some times. But that looks bad tot those nonhunter types.
Great information, very through, without being overly technical.
Very well presented and explained.
I’m no expert but I’ve always said regarding all optical equipment as a rule of thumb ‘Buy cheap,buy low magnification with large objective lens diameter - Buy expensive and the worlds your oyster’
Remember though like all things it’s [arguably] a case of diminishing returns ie. a scope costing double may be twice as good but one ten times the price probably isn’t ten times as good.
Lastly to quote Scotty from Star Trek “You canae change the laws of physics”
Very clear (excuse the pun) and comprehensive breakdown of the technical and practical aspects of a spotting scope. And what a lovely hound!
The best summary of optics performance I have ever seen.
Great video. I love spotting scopes. Anything that brings the stars and planets closer gives me a spiritual feeling I can't put into words, and keeps me in this crazy world.😁
What a fantastic, clear, to the point video, from someone who uses them in the field - thank you.
You are most welcome.
If anybody is looking at that Celestron Hummingbird be careful, there are 2 versions of it Micro and ED.
ED is more expensive but remember first point from this video about ED glass.
Very well done . Down to earth and very easy to under stand and relate to . This will help many people who are looking for info
ua-cam.com/channels/rKJ5aVast8tXtS-qRGL51w.html
choose binoculars
The Viper HD 10x42 bins at £475 are at the fringe of the mid way before you jump into the £1000 range. The glassware is great, and the super sharp image is like viewing your object in 3D. It cuts it out!
Not to mention one of the best warranties in the market.
I just ordered the viper 20-60x85 hd I was hoping to hear or see somewhere it was good quality glass.
Ron, This is probably the most informative tutorial on spotting scopes I have seen. Your explanation on going over 40 power is spot on(no pun intended). And your advice on how much to spend. I have a Leupold 20-40 that is crystal clear$$$. I have a Vanguard that is sup par$. P.S. - Love the comment on anti hunting !!!
Thanks Idaho! Good pun, too.
The dad I never had, such an informative wise man with knowledge and common sense! Thank you for your advice/opinion!
"KEEP ON KEEPIN ON"!
A real master seminar on spotting scopes, and no admission fee. Thank you sir!
Most welcome, Rod!
ua-cam.com/channels/rKJ5aVast8tXtS-qRGL51w.html
choose binoculars
What a wonderfully clear and informative introduction to previously confusing features and measurements. Bravo!
Excellent presentation of the different features regarding spotting scopes. Thanks for the great information.
Great video! You're very knowledgeable and did a great job describing all of this stuff.
Such a good primer regarding spotting scopes!
Wow. What a great vid. Shot in 4K too! Thanks for all the useful info Ron.
Great subject and well said Ron, thanks very much for your work in producing this video.
HD is High Dispersion glass, and ED is Extra Dispersion glass. Fluorite optics are even more expensive than HD or ED. Another issue is purging and gas charging -- typically Argon -- which prevents any fogging of the internal surfaces. For rugged use like banging around on the rocks, the seals can be compromised and the gas charge lost. Be sure to get padded protection to protect the scopes!
ua-cam.com/channels/rKJ5aVast8tXtS-qRGL51w.html
choose binoculars
You are the most comfortable casual older man on UA-cam I have seen... I like it! Great videos!!!
Why thank you, Stable. I can't remember ever being called comfortable and casual before. I'll take it!
@@RonSpomerOutdoors but I take it that you have bee called “older.” Personally, I would have to refer to you as younger.
This could really be a university lecture for optical scopes. Great explanation and an awesome video.
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you. This is the most helpful video on spotting scopes that I have seen.
Great Video Ron.
Also I like your Dog.
Thanks Ed!
My go to channel for any questions and expert explanations on outdoor products.
Despite the lame jokes--this was the best, most useful video I've found to date. Thank you for the information that other videos, particularly those put out by optic manufacturers, never bothered to include.
Fantastic explanations and I understood finally. Thanks and well done!
Such a pleasure listening and learning from you, thank you!
Excellent video. A true professional.
RE: protect the objective with a polarizing filter
I would also recommend, if your scope comes with a filter thread on the objective, to buy a 'polarizing filter'.
This filter protects the way more expensive objective lens and improves the viewing.
On my Leica Televid 82 it means that the sun cap can't be extended anymore ... but I don't miss it at all and am way more confident viewing in all weather conditions and in vegetation ... nothing will be able to damage the primary lens.
Also great for viewing stuff under water since it removes glare.
The image is like watching through a polaroid sunglasses but less severe. It has no disadvantages in my experience.
Thanks for the tip, Tim. The disadvantage with a polarizing filter is 1 to 2 stops of light lost. Another option for protecting the scope's objective lens that does not reduce light "throughput" is a simple UV Haze filter. As suggested, it reduces Ultraviolet haze in the atmosphere to increase color saturation.
Great display. Articulate and informative
Thanks for explaining.I am Dutch, now in Tuscany, and I had a german friend here, who in the war and later lived and worked in East Germany ad administrator/bookkeeper for Leica. I had a M3 for a long time. = he explained how working 7 days a week, every day he had to take all the handwritten notes from 1 of the 7 "bosses" of more than a 100 technicians (1000 total) , who had to cut slices of a big natural Christal of 2 x 1 x 0,5 meters, that they cut out of the mountain in the west of germany (1 every 3 years). = They needed according the fractional light passing through decide how to cut it and make lenses out of it. = Leica, who else! alex = I did not ask about the income of those poor people ...
One thing that you didn't go into is the advantages of having a spotting scope that incudes a MOA or MilDot reticle. A great advantage to range your target with the bigger scope or if you are shooting with a spotter, they can help you by calling wind and corrections after your shots.
Good point, Falcon. Thanks!
@@RonSpomerOutdoors Enjoy your work. Keep them coming while they are still allowed.
Really useful and well-organized content from an expert. Stright to the point!
Glad it was helpful!
Excellent video Mr Spomer. Love the English setter in the background, looks a beauty . He kind of stole the show. Regards
Thanks Jon. Covey is one of my better assets!
Thank you for your video. Love ur corny humor.....buying a used spotting scope to go look at the cranes in Nebraska.....you've brought up several really good points that I didn't think of......
Thanks 👍 I was photographing cranes near North Platte a week ago.
You are such a Pro! 100%
ua-cam.com/channels/rKJ5aVast8tXtS-qRGL51w.html
choose binoculars
Brilliant , Thank you for imformation well presented
Awesome video, Ron, I am searching for a optic to obverse target for long distance rifle shooting, was debating on getting an binocular or spotting scope. This video teaches me a lot of information. Thanks again.
ua-cam.com/channels/rKJ5aVast8tXtS-qRGL51w.html
choose binoculars
What I found useful is to buy a cell phone camera adapter mount that clamp on to the eye piece. There are plenty of them on amazon.
I use a dedicated cellphone attached to the mount ant the scope. The pros are:
- The phone will focus automatically, so there is some tolerance on non-accurate focus.
- Adapt to environment, esp for dawn and low light situation.
- You can zoom further on your phone to get 100x+ power.
- Good for me since I have frame glass. No need to hunt for the pupil.
- Wide viewing angle. Can share the view with others.
- If you want, you can take pictures or videos. I use it for my target spotting.
Cons:
- Tricky to setup. Lots of moving parts if you get a universal mount. That is why I used a dedicated phone. Set and not taking off.
- Need a battery pack if you want to spot for extended amount of time.
- light from the phone screen might not be good for hunting or night situation.
With swarovski you can use their camera lens adapter and slide your camera on the back of your spotter.
Brilliant and informative video thank you for taking the time to share.
Great Review...I bought a Nightforce TS-82 this summer. Fantastic
Yeah, super good video and the instructional was clear and informative. Thank you for sharing!
I’ve never heard it broke down like this.. very educational.. thanks Ron love your channel 👍😊
You are welcome, Steven. Glad you got something out of it.
Great video! I sell high end optics for a living, so I’m very invested in this world. I know you touched on it at the end, but it can’t be stressed enough how important quality is. A Swaro ATX 65 will mop the floor with most 80-100mm scopes out there. I use car analogies a lot. Just because two engines have the same displacement, doesn’t mean they perform the same. On that same note, a high displacement engine from forty years ago doesn’t have the efficiency of an engine with a quarter of its displacement made today. You get a lot more “Horsepower/cubic inch”. As much as I love old American Muscle Cars...the fact remains that an AWD Subaru made today will outperform almost any vintage car in almost every way...save for aesthetic (which itself is subjective). What’s not subjective is the fact that higher quality and enhanced technology will get more of it’s available horsepower to the ground, i.e. light to the eye. Thanks for the excellent video on a subject near and dear!
Great review Ron! Thank you so much.
Really great video Ron - thanks for sharing your experience!
14:17 "if there's suddenly a goat up there"🤣🤣🤣
Edit: Good stuff though.. best tutorial out her mahn.
I like how this guy looks like he knows what he’s doing
Actors look like the know what they're doing, though most don't. Maybe don't judge a book by it's cover.... In this instance, Ron provided an excellent tutorial.
I know this guy and he indeed knows what he's doing. He's a true pro and everything he does exudes excellence of the highest degree!
After watching this vid I bought a Roxant Blackbird. It's the best quality in its class and then some!
Incredible. Thank you.
Thank you for sharing your knowledge and experience! Very helpful video for a noob.
Thank you so much for your response. Much appreciated.
Jeffrey
Great info. Looking for one now!
Sir..that was some great must know very useful info on SS when buying one..especially if someone like me who will buy this once in lifetime and can't invest again or upgrade..by the way u have great way of explaining things..and those u have recommended are really desirable !
Happy to help
Excellent Sir ! Thank You so much for your knowledge and insight.
Extremely informative. Thank you.
Great information. Pretty comprehensive. I learned a lot. Thanks Ron.
Excellent!!! Thank you.
Very well thought out and presented. Did not know abt changing the eye piece. Like your straight forward, lots of detail, style. Very easy and enjoyable to watch. Thanks.
well i have been around long time . And all my maybe ones turned into gifts . So i have all Swarovski 8x32 15x50 and ATS 20x60 . they are all i need the 15x50 gets the most use
Thanks alot for this very informative video, regards from Germany.
First, Ron did an excellent job explaining the key components and what to look for. I do think Ron needs 10 Things to Consider, though. The most important consideration isn't the scope itself, it's the intended use. Spending $3500 on a Swarovski 20-60 x 80 is likely not your best choice if you're thru hiking or backpack hunting for days/miles, for most people. A small, lightweight scope may not be the best choice for someone who only cares about long range target shooting. IMHO, your primary application is the 1st Consideration. Everything else....follows. Seems obvious, but unfortunately, I've seen way too many buy the wrong scope because they skip this step. Once you've thought about your intended use, then research with the knowledge Ron has clearly provided.
Good video. Thanks Ron. Biggest issues with prismatic telescopes, going back to 1854 when Ignazio Porro started making and selling his telescopes in Paris, are:
Short eye relief and a small eye box.
Ilya Koshkin, aka Dark Lord of Optics, recently advised that spotting telescopes with mirrors instead of prisms have longer eye relief and larger eye boxes. The potential problem for most of us is that he was looking through a Hensoldt optic and I have yet to find any useful reviews of the cheaper products offered by Bushnell, etc.
NB If you are going to buy one of those modular spotting telescopes, check that the manufacturer coats the internal sidewalls with a special charged coating to attract any dust that gets inside the optic (in order to keep it off the optical elements). Companies like Schmidt and Bender introduced such coatings on their sighting telescopes because dust specks can easily get caught on glass reticles (which is one reason why wire reticles are still popular on second focal plane scopes).
This is a great scope, 3-9 is the perfect way to sight then aim.
Very useful video Mr Spomer! Thank you.
Good presentation and solid information
Great review. Thank you.
Bought a Landove 20x60 very reasonable. Excellent scope for far less than big name brands.
I appreciate the video . . . getting into long range shooting and need a spotting scope. Thanks.
Very informative! Thanks!
Another exceptional video!
ua-cam.com/channels/rKJ5aVast8tXtS-qRGL51w.html
choose binoculars
Excellent presentation, as always Ron. I’m currently looking for a scope, thanks!
I was looking for a spotter; I already owned Vortex Razor 22-28x65mm. It did okay the first 1.5 years of ownership but with aging eyes (69). I needed something with better glass, so was TRACT Optics spotter 27-55x80mm. I already own a TRACT Toric rifle scope 4-20x50mm30mmtube. I knew about the quality of Tract optics having the company's rifle scope.
Good stuff. I'm in the market now for the right one for me
ua-cam.com/channels/rKJ5aVast8tXtS-qRGL51w.html
choose binoculars
thanks man, i probably can never afford one, thanks for the 2nd hand excitement lol
We ben looking for a spotting scope. So this really helped out . Thank you.
A lot of great and, more importantly, accurate information here. Thanks!
Glad it was helpful!
The Swarovski spotting scopes are not really proprietary, they should have an Arca-Swiss compatible mounting foot (and their tripod heads are also Arca-Swiss compatible). At least the newer ones do have that feature.
So you should be able to mount any Arca-Swiss plates/heads to their equipment.
thanks for your help!
I have the same 65mm ATM/(ATS) as you. the foot fits perfectly with Manfrotto Quick Release heads.
ua-cam.com/channels/rKJ5aVast8tXtS-qRGL51w.html
choose binoculars
A problem I've encountered with spotting scopes is the (generally) very short eye relief. To use most scopes, I have to remove my headphones and eyeglasses, then get close enough to the eyepiece that I often touch it and move the scope.....effectively eliminating any convenience or functionality. Why can't the eye relief be inches, as in rifle scopes, rather than just a few millimeters?
Great job Ron. Your common sense approach is always refreshing. I also like, and believe as well, buy once, cry once. Buy the best you can afford, then get a little bit better. Let's just cut to the chase though, BUY THE SWAROVSKI ! Period. End of discussion.