Debate: We Were Right to Brexit

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 чер 2022
  • Brexit - the decision of the United Kingdom to leave the European Union. It's defenders say it made the country more independent it's detractors say it made the country less rich and powerful. Who's right? Join the debate.
    Featuring Daniel Hannan, Robert Tombs, Dominic Grieve, Stella Creasy and Jonny Dymond.
    --
    It was always going to be a disaster. Queues of HGVs stretching miles from Dover. The Good Friday Agreement threatened by the controversial Northern Ireland Protocol. Increased support for Scottish Independence. The promised lands of lucrative new trading partnerships exposed as nothing but carbon copies of pre-existing EU deals (with Australia the only exception). The livelihoods of fishermen, farmers, and small business owners threatened by extra costs and paperwork. All this, and we have yet to feel the long-term economic damage of leaving the EU, which the Office of Budget Responsibility predicts will cause a 4 per cent reduction to GDP. A recent poll shows that a majority of British people believe we are worse off having left the EU. Clearly, Brexit was a mistake.
    That’s the argument of the doomsters in this debate. But others claim that while short-term damage is inevitable - there is always blowback from a jilted partner - Brexit is a long-term project, one that is tied to the fundamental principle of sovereignty. The Referendum result was not just a reflection of disgruntlement with out-of-touch elites or the falsehoods of the Leave campaign, but a direct consequence of the EU’s failings. Instead of unaccountable bureaucrats in Brussels, we should put our faith in the idea of the nation state - the best vehicle for democracy. Granted, our trade with our neighbours is reduced, but that was a political choice, and the bulk of Britain’s economic activity is domestic. There are plenty of opportunities for success outside the shackles of EU regulation - what better indicator than the speed of the vaccine roll-out, which far outstripped that of other EU countries? If we sit tight and play to our strengths as a country, we will reap the rewards.
    Which side is right?

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,1 тис.

  • @Intelligence-Squared
    @Intelligence-Squared  2 роки тому +35

    What do you think - the right decision or a historic mistake? Leave your thoughts below..

    • @SkyTechLover
      @SkyTechLover 2 роки тому +114

      Huge mistake. I think the facts are clear. If Boris had decided to be with the Remain campaine now UK could easily be in EU.

    • @PEdulis
      @PEdulis 2 роки тому +2

      The biggest mistake the UK ever did, based on lies and lies put up by a shameless elite claiming to speak for the poor and dividing the country by blaming "foreigners" for everything the government messed up through austerity and corruption.

    • @themincingninjapoofsawayli898
      @themincingninjapoofsawayli898 2 роки тому +39

      @@SkyTechLover And what about the result of the vote? Does democracy only count when you get the result you like?

    • @SkyTechLover
      @SkyTechLover 2 роки тому +2

      @@themincingninjapoofsawayli898 The leave campaign was based on lies and endless propaganda. This is clear to everyone now. The majority of Brexiteeres didn't know what they were voting.
      Also the vote doesn't mean that we should be doomed forever because of one vote. That's why we call it democracy. If after few years a vote didn't achieve a positive outcome. Need to be challenged and a vote to be taken again.
      Welcome to true democracy. And not to your distopia.

    • @Jack.K96
      @Jack.K96 2 роки тому +14

      Both but mainly mistake.
      I stick to the view of David Cameron.
      Economically one-way mistake.
      Maybe securely security wise and immigration subjects were mostly benefited.
      Still.. economically has the major impact here.. can't deny it.
      As a conservative mainly in the aspects of defence/security and a bit more pro capitalism a bit more capitalism than socialism depends on the country.
      Right Wing Security Defence
      Both balanced capitalism and socialism economically
      Left Wing socially society.
      As a moderate-conservative more conservative and a bit labour, I think 3 historic stages in history damaged UK as the former British Empire which from my belief still exists culturally but not economically as it used to be.
      1. WWII 40s
      2. 80s The disastrous result of Margaret Thatcher's privatizing which went wrong "Done like a butcher instead of a surgeon".
      Unemployment rose and UK lost Jobs and the country's treasure lost too from the attempt of saving cash as unemployment rate rose and the unemployment checks with them and less incomes.
      Companies closed.
      Car companies.. sold or disappeared lost.
      3. 10s 2016 Brexit
      I try to look at the good side and the benefits from Brexit and being optimistic but unfortunately the drawbacks or disadvantages number and impact and their consequences outnumbered the benefits and advantages in whole in the bigger picture.
      P.s
      Many ppl didn't vote back then and it's mainly relatively old and young ppl who had the time to vote and so.. there might have been more voters with outdated thinking and views and more ignorant and more anxious and cautious about nationality preservation and security which I can understand the aspect of security mainly and also nationality but it can blind about the economic impacts and their consequences.
      So I believe that the people who could vote this day were mostly elderly and young generation perhaps but mainly the elderly and less the middle ages and so the results even by slight advantage for leaving the EU were caused by the lack of diversed voters and the availability of more outdated thinking voters that were mostly anxious and worried and cautious about nationality preservation and security and less of the economy and the economy implications too and mainly also complacency from the remain voters that were sure that the vote will result in a big advantage to remain and win the vote to remain so less voters showed up too from the remain voters who pro to remain in the EU.
      So.. I believe that a second vote to assure the realism and reliability of the result truely reflects most of the people opinion.
      Anyway.. these days.. covid did get more media attention and the public and the ppl attention than Brexit and the coming economic crisis recession and mainly what worries me, the direction of the world's security.
      Biden, Putin, Iran, China all of them worries me.
      Tough times ahead of us.
      Jack, 26
      EEE Student 2nd year
      Holds Practical Engineer H.n.d in Electronics Diploma
      Ultra-Anglophile fan of British Culture Sitcoms Comedy Music and Education and much more stuff, from Israel.
      Feel culturally more British. =D

  • @sic_transit_gloria_mundi
    @sic_transit_gloria_mundi Рік тому +83

    The most hilarious thing is that the panelists pretend that most Britons actually knew what the EU was about when they went to vote...

    • @rogerbeesley-lo5tj
      @rogerbeesley-lo5tj Рік тому

      EU membership was almost invisible on the minds of most voters. That "LEAVE" won is a testament to the power of propaganda put out by dishonest politicians and the absolutely amoral mass media.

  • @Tdot6
    @Tdot6 Рік тому +115

    I look at Brexit as the classic example of 'you don't know what you got until it's gone'

    • @peterclarke7240
      @peterclarke7240 Рік тому +20

      It's like having a nice partner who genuinely likes you, who asks you to do things like put the bins out and contribute to the household upkeep,... But you focus on how unfair it is that you have to put your playstation controller down and put out the bins, so you leave them, and end up selling your playstation for beer money and sleeping in your car and getting more and more bitter unti you eventually end up in the drunk tank trying to work out where it all went wrong.

    • @rogerbeesley-lo5tj
      @rogerbeesley-lo5tj Рік тому +10

      Britain was indulged by the EU with numerous "opt-outs", rebates, etc. The damage Brexit has done to the UK is irreparable. The future for England particularly is very grim.

    • @VIVA_CPTPP
      @VIVA_CPTPP Рік тому +2

      You can hear the bitter hatred in Greive's twaddle.
      He's repeating the wrl

    • @matsalvatore9074
      @matsalvatore9074 11 місяців тому +4

      Not at all. It's just a matter of proper policy.
      Enjoy ur independence, and believe me I know how much Europeans enjoy being ruled over n told how to live n giving up half their earnings in taxation, but you guys should really appreciate governing yourselves

    • @DavidEdwards-uf5lg
      @DavidEdwards-uf5lg 9 місяців тому

      I know what we had, and it wasn't much, lmfao, why do remainiacs keep rolling out failed politicians like Dominic Greaves? A has been, get in the trash bin where you belong.

  • @richardwillford2418
    @richardwillford2418 Рік тому +98

    As a European, I frequently bought British products on-line before Brexit came into effect. Now, seeing a £-sign is enough to steer me away to other on-line options. Buying from the UK is simply too expensive. Simple as that.

    • @aacmove
      @aacmove Рік тому +3

      100%

    • @parasitelights3158
      @parasitelights3158 Рік тому +6

      I only buy music online from abroad. The situation is that most of the bands/labels I'm a fan of are British and accordingly the best deals, new or second hand, were to buy them directly from them. All this ended in the summer of 2021 when the regulations came into force and my next order from the UK was delayed for almost a month and a half, after which I had to go to clear it from customs and finally I had to pay more than 60% extra. At the moment, the main criteria when choosing my orders is that they are not from UK, even if the price is higher, in the end they come out cheaper, arrive much faster and on top of everything I save myself a lot of headaches.

    • @HelenLemink
      @HelenLemink 10 місяців тому +6

      Same here, i used to buy a lot of expensive electronics to UK online shops but now i buy in Germany, because the delivery delays are uncertain, I need extra paperwork and have no time for that, I'm not sure about the VAT and extra custom cost ( or changes), not sure that the 2 years warranty made by the EU laws will always remain, not sure how to send back products if any problem, etc.. Even if the german shop was more expensive ( wich is not), I will not buy UK anymore. It's not that I don't like UK at all, I've always been very satisfied by the quality of your products, it's just that you are not reliable anymore. I also have customers to satisfy and can't sell them incertitudes.

    • @flitsertheo
      @flitsertheo 10 місяців тому +1

      I had a collection of Lledo/Corgi "Vanguard" miniature cars. Most of these were purchased in their country of origin, the UK. As it actually was the only country where you could find those miniatures, and at good prices.
      Today I have sold most of the collection as it is no longer possible to expand the collection.

    • @khipksy1888
      @khipksy1888 9 місяців тому +2

      Well quite a number of small sellers and small bussinesses in UK have closed down because of the loss of EU clients. For eg previously i used to see alot of products from UK on ebay and amazon here in Germany, and I used to buy alot of stuff from them. In my opinion the number of these small businesses that got closed down from brexit should be in 1000s, but thats ok I guess since instead 10 big businesses posted growth because of it, and thats what matters right?? Profits margin of big businesses who wanted to get rid of EU consumer and employee friendly regulations to make it more like USA. USA .. USA ...!

  • @saddoncarrs6963
    @saddoncarrs6963 Рік тому +43

    England, once the seat of a strong union and a mighty empire, has been on a long slow bumpy downward spiral since WW1. Brexit is all part of that decline. I'd say the country has a ways to go yet but, by all accounts, there is no reverse gear and the nation appears to be heading inextricably towards a rather rocky bottom - with people like Daniel Hannan and Robert Tombs leading the way. There is no empire left, and soon no union.

    • @jasonkingshott2971
      @jasonkingshott2971 Рік тому +1

      The European Union had many opportunities to change their ways, they didn't and we all know what happened next.

    • @saddoncarrs6963
      @saddoncarrs6963 Рік тому +5

      @@jasonkingshott2971 Yes, the EU goes from strength to strength and the UK is on the verge of splitting into its constituent parts.

    • @jasonkingshott2971
      @jasonkingshott2971 Рік тому +1

      @@saddoncarrs6963 Hey ho, that's democracy, I don't suppose it's allowed in your country, like Ireland when they voted for no further EU integration, then told to vote again until they got the 'correct result'

    • @saddoncarrs6963
      @saddoncarrs6963 Рік тому +5

      @@jasonkingshott2971 Actually, there is restricted democracy in my country. In 2014 the Scottish electorate voted to stay in the UK. In 2016 they voted to stay in the EU. They were then TOLD that they couldn't have both - and furthermore, they were TOLD that they didn't have a choice. In 2019, the tories lost more than half their seats in Scotland and the following year a tory PM imposed a hard brexit on the country against its will. So, yes, there is something of a democratic deficit in my country.
      With regard to the Irish - Ireland is an independent country within the EU. They're free to hold as many referendums as they like. So they can't be "told" to vote again, they can only be asked. If the Irish electorate came up with the "correct result" for the EU, it's only because the Irish electorate wanted it that way.

    • @jasonkingshott2971
      @jasonkingshott2971 Рік тому

      @@saddoncarrs6963 When and who told Scotland 'that they didn't have a choice' and where is it documented? in Hansard?
      The 2016 referendum was a United Kingdom referendum (the clue is in the name) the terms and conditions were set out at Westminster and agreed by all representatives of the UK.
      You need to come out of that cave you seem to be living in 'The referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon held on 12 June 2008 was rejected by the Irish electorate, by a margin of 53.4% to 46.6%, with a turnout of 53%'

  • @htlein
    @htlein 2 роки тому +200

    Europe is becoming less important? So how come ALL manufacturing companies are opting for the EU (CE) code when producing their goods for world-wide sale? How come the EU trading block is the largest in the world?

    • @jrobs1133
      @jrobs1133 2 роки тому +17

      Still thinking the EU is a trading block. Bless you

    • @htlein
      @htlein Рік тому +31

      @@jrobs1133 problem with that "question/statement is that you do not bring forward any example as to how the EU is NOT simply a trading block. Any examples where the EU parliament has proposed a LAW that could not be ignored by any given member state? Obviously not - so all the proposals coming from Brussels have to do directly or indirectly with the interaction of goods and/or services between member states and third countries - give me an example where this is not so. PS I do not need blessings since I do not have worship

    • @jrobs1133
      @jrobs1133 Рік тому +1

      @@htlein A "trading bloc" that proposes laws, has a parliament, and a president, is not simply a trading bloc. Sounds more like a country. So that is how it's not simply a trading bloc. NAFTA doesn't propose laws from a central parliament or have a president does it. God bless you, you ignorant fool.

    • @andrew300169
      @andrew300169 Рік тому +5

      @@htlein 3 weeks and still waiting for a reply I see.

    • @htlein
      @htlein Рік тому

      @@andrew300169 nope - no idea what that means

  • @rebeccagunn1946
    @rebeccagunn1946 2 роки тому +26

    Daniel Hannans presentation is pretty pathetic

    • @NikoHL
      @NikoHL Рік тому +5

      I couldn't listen to Hannon's drivel..

    • @philjames6206
      @philjames6206 Рік тому +4

      After 6 years it was the best he could come up with.

  • @TheMatthooks
    @TheMatthooks Рік тому +127

    Most debates start with a question, not a statement.
    Of course we weren't. We've royally screwed the economy and the people for generations to come.
    I'm still waiting for a brexiteer to tell me exactly what they've gained from Brexit...

    • @thomasherrin6798
      @thomasherrin6798 Рік тому

      Freedom from the useless E.U., not that we have to justify it to you or anybody, my vote, my choice we won, remoaners tried every trick in the book to block it, but at the end of the cold light of day, out we went, get over it! Note also the economy is not doing so well due to, in part, global circumstances and government errors which can be corrected with the right policies just got to vote smarter, however, compared to say Germany which has enjoyed cheap energy from you know who and paying them a fortune to fund the war and is supposedly sanctioning you know who but not that you'd notice, I much rather be British, not to mention the COVID 19 vaccine debacle where the E.U. wanted to take our vaccines, then spread misinformation about the Astra Zenica vaccine etc. I could go on, enough said!?!

    • @TheMatthooks
      @TheMatthooks Рік тому +14

      @Simon John first off, have you ever read the proposed changes? Because nothing in them could or would have forced us to give up the right to our own army or defence.

    • @dopeheaddude9651
      @dopeheaddude9651 Рік тому

      @Simon John all been debunked 5 years ago. The only reason we was given the vote was to save there tax loopholes

    • @foundationgamer9771
      @foundationgamer9771 Рік тому

      You understand that the positive effects are supposed to show after around 20 years? You left-wing pro-EU people are deliberately judging it too early.

    • @TheMatthooks
      @TheMatthooks Рік тому

      @@foundationgamer9771 ahhhhh. So it's OK to screw an entire generation of people on the off chance that it might make a difference in two or three decades. Gotcha.

  • @Nunyabusinesss887
    @Nunyabusinesss887 Рік тому +90

    Listening to this 7 months after it was posted with the benefit of hindsight, it's actually incredible how much the Remain speakers are correct, and how much the speakers for Leave have been proven wrong.

    • @jasonkingshott2971
      @jasonkingshott2971 Рік тому

      What do you mean, 'correct'?

    • @Nunyabusinesss887
      @Nunyabusinesss887 Рік тому +7

      @Invictus Ok Boomer

    • @Nunyabusinesss887
      @Nunyabusinesss887 Рік тому +6

      @@jasonkingshott2971 That the events of the last 7 months, and the new economic information we have, have proved everything that Remain side said here was true, and embarrassed the Leave side as everything they said has been proved false

    • @jasonkingshott2971
      @jasonkingshott2971 Рік тому

      @@Nunyabusinesss887 The UK democrats who voted out are not 'embarrassed', they are delighted they are out of that cesspit.

    • @Nunyabusinesss887
      @Nunyabusinesss887 Рік тому

      @@jasonkingshott2971 I know many Brexiteers are celebrating the destruction of the UK, yes.

  • @whocares264
    @whocares264 Рік тому +20

    I wonder why countries are queuing to join the EU...

    • @12presspart
      @12presspart Рік тому

      yes Serbia.Bosnia/hersagovinia.Albania.Montanegro.North macerdonia.Georgia Turkey was a candadate but withdrew.

    • @greentoby26
      @greentoby26 9 місяців тому +1

      What's wrong with those countries?

    • @whocares264
      @whocares264 9 місяців тому +2

      @@greentoby26 they have looked at how -ucked the uk is outside

    • @reellezahl
      @reellezahl 6 місяців тому +1

      @@12presspartoh look, the racist xenophobe has come out of the woodwork

  • @lecturesfromleeds614
    @lecturesfromleeds614 Рік тому +208

    The irony is that Boris Johnson not enforcing reciprocal checks on EU goods, it gives EU producers a competitive advantage over UK producers, which they wouldn't have in a level playing field, which being in the single market would have provided

    • @Pantifaximile
      @Pantifaximile Рік тому +10

      That would have just fucked us twice.

    • @stuartbrown3070
      @stuartbrown3070 Рік тому +4

      What total bollocks!

    • @uingaeoc3905
      @uingaeoc3905 Рік тому +2

      Not really, EU imports to UK have fallen and UK exports to EU have not changed.

    • @tcritt
      @tcritt Рік тому +39

      ​@@uingaeoc3905 That's not true though.

    • @uingaeoc3905
      @uingaeoc3905 Рік тому +1

      @@tcritt It is true - go to the ONS for the proof. In fact UK exports to the EU are at an historic high.

  • @abelnicolae
    @abelnicolae Рік тому +198

    To sum up this debate, for all of you who don't want to lose their time: If you repeat a lie many, many times, it ends up becoming true... in your head. And since it's in your head, nobody can take that away from you. Cheers. :)

    • @ryuhayabusa5609
      @ryuhayabusa5609 Рік тому +7

      thank you for saving my time

    • @jim_herd
      @jim_herd Рік тому +9

      The lie being that the EU was a good thing and it was worth being a member. Naturally.

    • @SimUKReviews
      @SimUKReviews Рік тому +1

      The lie about immediate recession and job losses IF we voted leave....agreed.
      Total BS and proven as fear mongering, which caused many more people to not vote to leave (fear).
      Actually that fear mongering helped me vote out, anyone using threats to convince you they are right is 100% WRONG.

    • @jim_herd
      @jim_herd Рік тому

      @@SimUKReviews They’re still trying to screw Brexit up. There’s a name for people who try to do things like that to their own country.

    • @complexaltruist
      @complexaltruist Рік тому +13

      @@jim_herd no

  • @Ben-ej1xp
    @Ben-ej1xp 2 роки тому +130

    Leavers like these 2 are going to eventually run out of people to blame. Slow disintegration of the U.K.

    • @LambsyLamb
      @LambsyLamb 2 роки тому

      The Professor of nationalism seems to forget the British BREXIT cheerleaders are as corrupt as the Europeans if not more so!

    • @sararichardson737
      @sararichardson737 2 роки тому +2

      I’m not fit enough for this. I’m feeling nauseous.

    • @evolassunglasses4673
      @evolassunglasses4673 2 роки тому

      The West is going under to Globalisation.

    • @yellowgreen5229
      @yellowgreen5229 2 роки тому

      They NEVER run out of scape goats and dead cats, this is why they are pushing fascist policies which is the next stage of capitalism for the UK or what is left of it, as it quickly disintegrates.

    • @mogznwaz
      @mogznwaz 2 роки тому +2

      Why on earth do you consider it such a bad thing for a country to be sovereign and not to consolidate more and more power into fewer and fewer hands? What’s wrong with you??

  • @ryans756
    @ryans756 Рік тому +40

    Absolutely delighted that Pierluigi Collina managed to find work after leaving Italian football :)

  • @GThu1
    @GThu1 Рік тому +20

    I liked the argument: "Look we have more visa requests since the brexit!" Of course you have, since many people has to request now who hadn't before. That only means the burocracy is stronger now.

  • @ems7623
    @ems7623 Рік тому +208

    It's a little too early to see the full consequences of Brexit. However, so far we have a potential trade war with the EU, a renewed crisis in Northern Ireland, rising costs, and an emboldened Putin who long ago considered distancing the UK from the EU an essential goal of Russia's foreign diplomacy. It has even weakened the special relationship with the US who does not wish to take sides in UK-EU disputes and is frustrated with the perpetual tantrums Westminster has been having with Brussels.

    • @ominousparallel3854
      @ominousparallel3854 Рік тому +11

      It would have been wiser to keep it to the first sentence.

    • @colinstephenson5386
      @colinstephenson5386 Рік тому +41

      @@ominousparallel3854 why do you think it would’ve been wiser ? Is telling the truth unwise ? Or maybe telling it as it is won’t get a great deal of appreciation from the Hard Of Thinking ?

    • @ominousparallel3854
      @ominousparallel3854 Рік тому +11

      @@colinstephenson5386 relating ‘emboldened Putin’ or ‘rising costs’ on Brexit is, to put it politely, absolute nonsense.

    • @geoffallibone4026
      @geoffallibone4026 Рік тому +29

      @@ominousparallel3854 O mighty speaker of wisdom! Can you sell me some of what you are smoking?

    • @rugbykiwi9
      @rugbykiwi9 Рік тому

      You mean the full benefits of Brexit. Why would you just look at consequences?

  • @jayb9779
    @jayb9779 2 роки тому +12

    Daniel Hannan is such a snake oil salesman

    • @philjames6206
      @philjames6206 Рік тому +1

      You do a disservice to snake oil salesmen.

  • @htlein
    @htlein 2 роки тому +104

    David Frost negotiated the TCA and NOW he is surprised - what does that tell you about his level of competence as a negotiator?

    • @mikefish8226
      @mikefish8226 2 роки тому +4

      It tells me you don't have a clue.

    • @mogznwaz
      @mogznwaz 2 роки тому

      His hands were tied behind his back thanks to EU intransigence and UK remainer treachery

    • @htlein
      @htlein 2 роки тому +3

      @@mogznwaz "His hands were tied behind his back thanks to EU intransigence and UK remainer treachery" not sure what this refers to who is "he"

    • @Frohicky1
      @Frohicky1 2 роки тому

      I don't think that's quite right. The EU worked against the interests of it's own population in punishing the UK for leaving. This is surprising if one thinks the EU is a club for mutual benefit. It isn't if one realises it's a cabal to exact propitiations from some portions of its own population in order to further the political and cultural preferences of some others of its members.

    • @hannofranz7973
      @hannofranz7973 2 роки тому +13

      @@htlein The same old blame game as always. It was your Brexit decision. The EU has enough reason not to care about the eternal troublemakers. It's wise not to negotiate anything with them.

  • @SaniyaKhan-ru5dr
    @SaniyaKhan-ru5dr Рік тому +81

    I'm an American, and I can see a lot of dysfunction in the EU, issues with sovereignty, but the UK offered a referendum on the most dramatic issue the country has faced in possibly centuries, with absolutely *_No Fu**ing Plan!_* Was Brexit about staying in the single market and customs union, either, or neither? What was going to happen with Northern Ireland? What was the plan for supply chains? How were they going to keep London, Europe's only global financial hub, competative with New York, Tokyo, or Shanghai? What were they looking for in global trade? Except for Australia, the UK has carried over the same global trade deals as the EU with minor changes, and after leaving its biggest local market, is now scrabling to join trading blocks in Asia-Pacific, and N. America, it's like they've never heard of the gravity model of international trade, trade with the biggest closest neighbors is more important than little, far away, Australia. Jesus.

    • @thecheesefactor
      @thecheesefactor Рік тому +19

      As a Canadian in the UK I saw little effort here to answer such questions. Many were put under the heading 'project fear'. It has been like watching a train wreck in slow motion. Slowly, people are starting to wake up to how big a mistake this was. The pandemic and the war in Ukraine have been useful for those trying to hide the damage, but now we are seeing the economies in Western Europe recover at a significantly faster rate than we are.

    • @stuartbrown3070
      @stuartbrown3070 Рік тому

      Your view (that there was no plan) is basically a lie put about by EU supporting media, commentators and politicos. The truth is far more murky.

    • @uingaeoc3905
      @uingaeoc3905 Рік тому

      @@thecheesefactor These questions were addressed successfully during the Referendum, and the only argument that the EuroFanatics had was 'Project Fear'; they made NO positive statements about the EU and it is these arguments that won over the biggest vote for anything in UK Electoral History. That was after 42 years membership and the previous referendum was a 2 to 1 majority in favour of joining. Strange how the practical reality broker through the propaganda, The whole of the Western economies are in crisis because of Lockdown dislocations and money printing and an Eco-Lunacy of energy crises and so stagflation.
      Is Brexit responsible for this in the US and EU and Australia and New Zealand?
      What damage has been caused by Brexit EXACTLY?

    • @uingaeoc3905
      @uingaeoc3905 Рік тому

      Utter tosh. There was a plan - to Leave the EU its institutions and arrangements. None of this was allowed to happen. the majority of MPs and the Establishment especially civil service are pro-EU because it puts them beyond responsibility and accountability. The NIP was a device to halt even the minimal withdrawal from the EU by using NI as a ratchet.
      Supply chains were disrupted by the World Wide Lockdowns. There has been no direct dislocation caused by Brexit as the trading patterns with the EU are the same, but UK has started to take advantage of alternative supplies of EU imports because these have fallen. That was the point of the T&CA.
      Your ignorance in regard to financial services is astounding - London's position was being threatened by the EU imposing a Tobin tax - so EU membership was a threat to that.
      What on earth do you mean by 'biggest local market' ? this is arrant nonsense the UK's biggest market is the non-EU rest of the World. The EU never bought stuff from the UK because were were in the EU. The Single Market was never an advantage tothe UK. It is not even a 'market' as it is not a place for consumer preferences but supplier price fixing.
      The bi-lateral trade 'roll overs' were added to and refined to give mutual advantages between the UK and other party, something the EU's non-trade 'deals' did not do. There is NO 'scrabbling' to join trading blocs, these associations have aske the UK, uniquely in Europe' to join them. They are not 'blocs' at all, this is your EU mind set. The UK traded successfully on WTO terms compared to the non-advantages of the EU system. There is no reality to the 'gravity model' of trade and has not been since the exploration and colonial era - certainly not today - ask the Japanese and Chinese. The UK traded at a surplus with rest of world in bigger volumes and values than with the EU (six nations and 21 tadpoles) which in our 42 years membership was always in deficit.
      Your self delusion is palpable.

    • @thecheesefactor
      @thecheesefactor Рік тому +12

      @@uingaeoc3905 It's impossible to 100% leave the EU and its institutions and arrangements, because they are the largest trading partner and continue to be. Now, we just don't get to vote on them any more as a non-EU member. Most in the know are pro-EU because they know about basic Economics, and to vote trade restrictions onto oneself is stupid. There are gains from trade. The freer trade is, the more those gains are realised.
      There are those in the establishment who wish to see tax havens preserved, and promotion of the Brexit cause shares an uncomfortable parallel with the EU ramping up its efforts to regulate tax havens. We are talking about the top 1% of incomes here, and various dodgy companies including Russian oligarchs who donate to the Tory party.
      We're now the worst performing economy in the G7 except for Russia. This is due to Brexit. The worldwide lockdowns have caused problems everywhere but the UK has it worse - because Brexit makes everything worse.
      "The EU never bought stuff from the UK because were were in the EU"? Nonsense, UK exporters are continuing to lose market share. Your arrogance is matched only by your lack of knowledge of the actual statistics, and wallowing in pro-leave propaganda.
      You can deny the relevance of the gravity model of trade all you like, but the reality is the EU remains the UK’s largest trading partner. However, for the first time since comparable records began in 1997, the UK now spends more importing goods from the rest of the world than it does from the EU. Can you tell me who is absorbing those extra transport costs? Hmm?

  • @VeeSeven700
    @VeeSeven700 Рік тому +83

    We're moderately worse off than we otherwise would have been in the EU. As expected, really. The idea that we could leave the biggest economic market on earth and become better off really was always laughable.
    And the real zinger for me is the massive increase in illegal immigration as a result of Brexit. The irony is stunning in that one. Who'd have thought that distancing ourselves from our closest neighbours would lead to them being less willing to help us deal with our problems. Did anyone honestly think we could walk away and France would just volunteer to continue to essentially have our border on French soil? Dear me.

    • @geoffallibone4026
      @geoffallibone4026 Рік тому +5

      I have a bridge for sale. It's a beauty. I think you should buy it.

    • @Callie1981
      @Callie1981 Рік тому +9

      "moderately worse off" I needed a laugh today

    • @orbazel
      @orbazel Рік тому +2

      Spoken as if dinghies crossing the channel only started in January 2021.

    • @VeeSeven700
      @VeeSeven700 Рік тому +6

      @@orbazel Ever since we've negotiated our exit from the EU the number of crossings has skyrocketed. What a surprise! 😅

    • @orbazel
      @orbazel Рік тому +2

      @@VeeSeven700 no denying that, but you’ve got to realise that what is causing these illegal crossings in the first place is a) an open door immigration policy that allows inter-member state travel. B) an unwillingness by the EU and it’s member states to stop illegal immigration entering the EU in the first place. At the end of the day, by UK, EU and French standards, the crossings are illegal and for remainers including yourself to champion the idea that if we’d stayed then the French would actually do what they’re supposed to but because we’ve left then they’re wilfully encouraging illegal activity is a pretty piss poor excuse to want to stay. A ‘you’d better vote remain or else we’ll drop our own standards, forget our own laws and allow illegal activities against you’ is precisely the type of mentality we should all be speaking out against. Some of us however seem to revel in it.

  • @edgardebruin5539
    @edgardebruin5539 2 роки тому +77

    brexit is a total disaster

    • @SirAntoniousBlock
      @SirAntoniousBlock 2 роки тому +22

      Not really, soon Scotland will be independent and Ireland reunited so not a total disaster. 😎

    • @jamesscottvideos
      @jamesscottvideos 2 роки тому

      Yes, a disaster for the EU, now that they can't keep taking our money, and can't afford their bloated burocracy.

    • @klausschumacher7126
      @klausschumacher7126 2 роки тому +2

      Not really...no more discussions within the EU about leaving.....

    • @nicholasnunhofer8501
      @nicholasnunhofer8501 2 роки тому +1

      Rubbish

    • @evolassunglasses4673
      @evolassunglasses4673 2 роки тому

      The disaster for the West is debt based economic systems run by central Bankers.

  • @htlein
    @htlein 2 роки тому +47

    the Eu has exploited ;" the Ireland Situation" (presumably he means NI although he does not say so!) How could the EU exploit a "situation" that the UK government forced the UK to accept (and THAT without any discussion or vote in our Parliament!

    • @tobymaltby6036
      @tobymaltby6036 Рік тому +7

      Iknowrite ?? All those EU bureaucrats meddling around at the Boyne in July 1690 ...

    • @greentoby26
      @greentoby26 9 місяців тому

      The EU can exploit what it wants and does what it can to put itself in the best possible position, as every sovereignty does. What's the UK going to do, embargo them?

  • @richardsimms251
    @richardsimms251 Рік тому +63

    What an excellent debate. I have benefited from listening to both sides. But in general, my personal and emotional feeling is that the world is a happier place when geographically close countries do everything to live in harmony ( especially considering Europe’s awful history of endless warring ). RS. Canada

    • @flitsertheo
      @flitsertheo Рік тому +7

      And that's the goal of the EU, preventing war between its members by closer cooperation.

    • @dynamo1796
      @dynamo1796 Рік тому +5

      I heard it put best by a great economics lecturer and researcher, Anand Menon. Where in the history of the world has a nation done best by neglecting trade with an economic powerhouse on its doorstep? The US trade closely with Mexico and Canada, the Russians, the Indians and the Chinese and the South Americas. It simply makes no sense to trade only across the globe at a competitive disadvantage when the worlds major economy sits mere miles from your coast. That will never ever be sensible economic policy.

    • @objectsmith
      @objectsmith Рік тому +1

      @Dynamo Though non of those countries you mentioned has a political union, like them we already have a trade and cooperation agreement with the EU and I don't believe that trading with them has come to a halt either although the massive trade deficit we had has come down in our favour and we no longer have to pay for it. There are pros and cons to Brexit it's time we stopped obsessing about the cons and got on with it.

    • @flashgordon6670
      @flashgordon6670 Рік тому +2

      If you listen until the end, you will learn that the fundamental point, is about democracy and the right to self determination.
      - The Leave party closed by saying, “I would rather live, in a free democratic country, than in a multinational Empire.” (For better or worse) by implication.
      - This is a very tough issue. Bc there’s pros and cons, with both sides of it.
      - Personally, I didn’t vote in the referendum. Bc I don’t know, what the correct choice is. As I have no understanding, of the inner mechanisms and consequences of Brexit and I could see fallacies, employed by both camps, in the pre Brexit debate.
      - Everything that Remain said, would be lost by leaving and gained by remaining, could be accomplished after leaving and visa versa.
      - So what it all really boils down to, is which flag you prefer and which group of corrupt bureaucrats you prefer.
      - At least with Leave the EU, there’s only one group, rather than two, controlling the country.
      - But on the other hand, Great Britain is a group of countries, so there’s a fallacy in the logic of the Leave’s closing statement as well.
      - The problem with asking the people to decide the matter, was that the vast majority, as I. Have absolutely no idea, of what the mechanisms and consequences are.
      They may as well have asked us, how to build a space rocket. It’s a complete fallacy and a sham that they deferred to the people to make the decision.
      It’s like if a family with 5 children all go to the garage when the car is being repaired and they all vote on what to do with the car. It makes no sense whatsoever.
      - So, what I’ve recently deduced, from this fact. Is that they were always going to implement Brexit and they just wanted to use the people, as a scapegoat, for the blame afterwards. So when things go wrong they will say, ‘It was the people’s choice.’ Thus clearing themselves of any guilt. - The very fact a referendum was even held at all, says that things are going to go wrong, after Brexit is implemented.
      - They knew this all along, those crafty, pesky politicians and they’ve just been stringing everyone along, as they always do.
      - Creating the Corona pandemic was just a way of distracting from Brexit and deferring the blame for the post Brexit recession. It’s also “The wall” that Donald Trump promised to build.
      - The other reason that I didn’t vote in the referendum and more importantly. Is bc I put my trust in God, to guide the nations and Brexit was a part of his divine will. If the prophecy in Ezekiel 37, Daniel and other parts in the Bible. About the two opposing coalitions at Armageddon is to come true. The EU will be on Russia’s side with Persia, Libya and Ethiopia and Great Britain will be in opposition, “with all the young lions thereof.”
      - There is a YT video called Brexit and the Bible What next? That explains briefly about that.
      - At the time I bet on Leave @9/2 and later I bet on Donald Trump @9/2 as well. Bc of his policies that fitted with Brexit and the Bible’s prophecy. Also bc I saw him on The Apprentice USA in 2005 and I knew then that he had the potential to become president.
      Unfortunately I lost in 2018 on Trump, bc of the rigging. But I believe that he will return as President in 2024. Bc there’s no real credible opponent. Again it’s 9/2, I’ve already put my last £840 on it and I’m going to do more.
      I rest my case and I hope this helps.

    • @matsalvatore9074
      @matsalvatore9074 11 місяців тому

      @@flitsertheo ha... no

  • @colinstephenson5386
    @colinstephenson5386 Рік тому +46

    Hannan says we can do things different, the EU has said all new devices requiring USB power connections have to be universal, Mr Johnson said the UK won’t follow the EU , the manufacturers will make all their new products comply , why ? , because 600 m EU potential customers trumps Johnson’s 64 m customers,

    • @stevenrogers5506
      @stevenrogers5506 Рік тому +2

      So Johnson has said he won't force UK companies to comply, they have the freedom to decide for themselves, which they have now done?

    • @davidwarburton-burley9967
      @davidwarburton-burley9967 Рік тому +20

      @@stevenrogers5506 The point is Brexit achieved nothing because the UK remains within the EU's sphere of influence. The UK just lost any say in EU the decisions that affect it

    • @stevenrogers5506
      @stevenrogers5506 Рік тому +3

      Brexit achieved nothing because British companies have had the freedom to choose to whether or not they follow EU rules? Interesting logic there.

    • @AppleSauceGamingChannel
      @AppleSauceGamingChannel Рік тому +7

      @@stevenrogers5506 British companies have that choice whether the UK is part of the EU or not. If they don't comply with EU regulations they cannot sell there.
      The main difference is that the UK has no say on what regulations are implemented in the EU now.

    • @stevenrogers5506
      @stevenrogers5506 Рік тому +2

      @applesauce British companies dont choose if the UK is in the EU or not, they have chosen to comply with EU regulation so they can sell to EU customers. But UK companies dont have to make products according to EU regulation. Say a new company sets up in the UK to sell goods or services to Japan or South Korea, or China, in the future, that company is not constrained by EU legislation to make the product in a certain way. The company is free to make a product which suits its intended market. Savvy?

  • @daraorourke5798
    @daraorourke5798 Рік тому +8

    Nobody is talking about leaving the Single Market - Daniel Hannan.

  • @ArtyFactual_Intelligence
    @ArtyFactual_Intelligence Рік тому +10

    The supreme act of British Self Harm.

  • @7rob27
    @7rob27 Рік тому +11

    Dan: Delusional and dishonest.

  • @JohnDoe-bq9tq
    @JohnDoe-bq9tq 2 роки тому +51

    It seemed like there was a lot of disagreement on what the actual facts were.

    • @DrCruel
      @DrCruel 2 роки тому +1

      It also seems that this "debate" was something of a set-up.

    • @mikefish8226
      @mikefish8226 2 роки тому +10

      I suspect the disagreement on facts is largely due to the difficulty of deconvolving COVID from BREXIT, cherrying picking on both sides and the relatively short time period since BREXIT actually happened due to politicians spending significant time trying to not undertake the task given to them by the British public.

    • @gomperhooblet
      @gomperhooblet 2 роки тому +2

      @@mikefish8226 Well said, Mike.

    • @VelcroKittie
      @VelcroKittie Рік тому +7

      @@mikefish8226 You mean the British electorate. The "British Public" is a little vague in my opinion and gives the impression that a majority of the British wanted Brexit...which is obviously untrue.

    • @mikefish8226
      @mikefish8226 Рік тому +4

      @@VelcroKittie By the same token, you could say the majority of the British public didn't want to stay in the EU. It's a slippery slope to say that because the majority of all human beings with a state didn't vote for a particular action it is illegitimate. If you didn't vote you probably didn't care either way, abstention isn't a vote against.

  • @benjio77
    @benjio77 2 роки тому +32

    Despite 6 years to think about it, the brexiteers couldn't think of a single brexit benefit- so the haunted pencil, Jacob Reese-Mogg, polled Express 'readers' for ideas. 2000 were rejected for being ridiculous, unworkable or plain illegal. The top two ideas? More fracking and less efficient vacuum cleaners.

  • @johnBSadro
    @johnBSadro 2 роки тому +28

    If I run a shop and I decide to stop trading with the vast majority of my clients - never mind that I insult them in the process - what do you think will happen to my business?

    • @bh5037
      @bh5037 2 роки тому

      if you ask a brexshiteer you simply have to trade elsewhere or to work harder ! or leave for the EU ! happy with such an answer ???

    • @ZER0--
      @ZER0-- 2 роки тому +5

      When your business fails you will blame your clients of course (if you were a Brexiteer.)

    • @jrobs1133
      @jrobs1133 2 роки тому +1

      When did we stop trading?

    • @Malky24
      @Malky24 Рік тому +1

      If I'm on the board of a supermarket and decide to leave that job to set up a shop next door to the supermarket how well do you think I'm going to do?

    • @jrobs1133
      @jrobs1133 Рік тому +2

      @@Malky24 Goods exports to the EU reached £16.4bn in April 2022, their highest level in current prices since the series began in 1997. So, you'd do that well.

  • @S-u-p-a
    @S-u-p-a Рік тому +51

    And that ladies and gentlemen is exactly why:
    1. Russian involvement was there to cause Brexit but had no effect.
    2. The DUP published adverts supporting Brexit twisting the argument but had no impact.
    3. The figure on the bus 🤣 was lies. But no impact.
    4. Since Brexit 4 years back we have already made a loss exceeding ALL the membership fees paid but ofcourse no impact.
    5. Bojo was getting a bojo leading Brexit.
    UK is at the brink of breaking up. But we were right to leave on lies. It's all good.

  • @billpugh58
    @billpugh58 2 роки тому +63

    Slowest growth in the G20 bar Russia. Why is Johnson still spouting the fastest growth lie?

    • @23bit76
      @23bit76 2 роки тому

      He's explaining tory donors erections

    • @oneeyedgirl617
      @oneeyedgirl617 2 роки тому +6

      Because it will all unravel if he (they) started admitting the truth...its unravelling anyway, just slower.

    • @Mercs_Beamers
      @Mercs_Beamers 2 роки тому

      Because he thinks that we were studied enough to believe blatant and obvious lies from the vote leave campaign so we’ll believe anything but people getting poorer and poorer over time and they’ll start to see the truth

    • @Mercs_Beamers
      @Mercs_Beamers 2 роки тому +5

      @Leroy Jenkins the economy contracted the last few months!
      Go on blame covid
      I actually can’t believe your argument!
      There wasn’t a recession when we voted leave, never mind the recession that’s just about to happen when we did actually leave.

  • @Bayerberg
    @Bayerberg 2 роки тому +62

    Heres an idea - publish all source data on subjects included in your statements. Things will become clear to anyone willing to spend the time to dig through the facts. Take a guess which side bends the truth and which blatantly lies.

    • @user-mg3xr9tz7m
      @user-mg3xr9tz7m 2 роки тому

      The problem is that people are not educated to do critical analysis and on a Country where the media is 98% controlled directly or indirectly (including the BBC) by the Tories then its a recipe for disaster

    • @vulgoalias4050
      @vulgoalias4050 2 роки тому +3

      Well, both of them. They just lie in different ways about different things.

    • @engineeringvision9507
      @engineeringvision9507 Рік тому +9

      You can't because they are debating current reality against a hypothetical alternative history where the UK was still in the EU. It's almost impossible to remove the massive inflationary effects of the printed relief money, the worldwide production shortages, the war in Ukraine and the pandemic itself from the model as those are such impactful economic events. Even if you could it wouldn't actually matter because leave is generally regarded to give the best economic prospects in the medium to longer term, and remain in the short to medium term. So if you're 85 then Brexit doesn't make much sense but if you're 25 then it does even though those groups effectively voted for each others best interests!

    • @damianbylightning6823
      @damianbylightning6823 Рік тому

      @@engineeringvision9507 Best joke is that Plaid Cymru lark about making it an offence for a politician to tell lies - we're seriously wasting parliamentary time and resources on this. Why do we have people like Liz Saville Roberts (PC) elected to Parliament?

    • @TW-mp8zx
      @TW-mp8zx Рік тому

      Our language is as bent as the minds that navigate it... everything is loopholed into a bendable subject able nothingness... we can say and do anything and get away with it if we know how to, so i take it we can walk away from this subject now?

  • @AndereAlbert
    @AndereAlbert Рік тому +8

    The rest of the world is laughing at (Brexit) Britain.

    • @AndereAlbert
      @AndereAlbert Рік тому +2

      But from the Netherlands, we would love to have you back.

    • @xyleblack2545
      @xyleblack2545 Рік тому +1

      ​@@AndereAlbert Same here from a German.
      But, you can laugh at the insane decision while simultaneously wanting the UK to reconsider it's course.

  • @margaretbagnall4729
    @margaretbagnall4729 Рік тому +12

    Why is it all the right wing parties in the Europe are no longer stating that they want to leave the EU because they have looks at what is going on in the UK and actually now see the benefits of being in the EU and single market and Customs Union

    • @greentoby26
      @greentoby26 9 місяців тому

      It's not as much a right- or left-wing issue, it's one of such basic decency that even the most deranged populists, no matter if right or left wing, avoid it.

    • @bryanutility9609
      @bryanutility9609 6 місяців тому

      @@greentoby26The issue is mass 3rd world invasion. Nothing else matters.

  • @airdog1829
    @airdog1829 Рік тому +27

    'When you're wrong, own up to what you didn't do right. That's how you learn and earn respect'. 🤗

    • @EzraMerr
      @EzraMerr Рік тому

      Exactly direct that to EU and their policies as well as Prime Ministers like Wilson who turned UK into the socialist shithole it is for over 70 years now whilst brainwashed students blame the problems caused by socialism (fascism) on ( non existent) capitalism

    • @allsearpw3829
      @allsearpw3829 Рік тому +1

      What a nice way to live ones life . IF ONLY .😉

    • @Aldo_Regozzani
      @Aldo_Regozzani Рік тому +2

      England lost all respect, so it has to learn a LOT!

    • @EzraMerr
      @EzraMerr Рік тому +1

      @@Aldo_Regozzani EU too

    • @Aldo_Regozzani
      @Aldo_Regozzani Рік тому +1

      @@EzraMerr YEP!

  • @ianparker1456
    @ianparker1456 2 роки тому +15

    People sitting in the house of Lords talking about lack of democracy

    • @whocares264
      @whocares264 Рік тому +1

      never mind we will have an unelected pm soon ...

  • @Milo-wl2if
    @Milo-wl2if Рік тому +36

    The Uk's Consumer Price Inflation was 9.0% in May 2022 according to the ONS, not 6.7% as claimed by Hannan.

    • @uingaeoc3905
      @uingaeoc3905 Рік тому +3

      Look at the date he was dealing with.

    • @susansantapola
      @susansantapola Рік тому

      He is massaging the figure to suit his narrative.

    • @Milo-wl2if
      @Milo-wl2if Рік тому

      @Simon John no, the reason energy costs are so high is because of lack of investment in new supply and idiot Governments legislating against fossil fuel exploration and production and trying to retire nuclear energy. Covid lockdowns and the Ukraine war are distractions from a decade of terrible policy making.

    • @Milo-wl2if
      @Milo-wl2if Рік тому

      @Simon John add in money creation during a decade of QE, climate change devastating food production and stupid decisions to create trade friction due to a xenophobic ideology means more than a decade of high inflation to look forward to. All the while Rupert Murdoch and his ilk will tell you to blame anyone and anything that suits his nihilistic agenda.

    • @PDVism
      @PDVism Рік тому +1

      @Simon John hmm..... strange tho' that even while the EU countries had to deal with the pandemic as well that they seem to do a whole lot better economically. I wonder why that would be.
      Of course it can't have anything to do with Brexit, surely not, could it, perhaps?

  • @andomikel1
    @andomikel1 Рік тому +20

    Since this debate two big news have entered the debate :
    1 The Scottish official demand for a new referendum.
    2 the current account deficit number for the first semester of this year , which is 8.3 %…………..

    • @UkSapyy
      @UkSapyy Рік тому

      Predicted to rise to 13%. Brexiters claim stuff like we had the fastest vaccine roll out however we also wasted 37bn on a track and trace system that did not work. Then we went and spent our annual foreign aid budget just on Ukraine because the government once again wants to portray the UK as strong. Our government spent so much just trying to be the first and now the government expects us to pay for their pantomime show.
      What's worse is the public has become complacent to political corruption as we watch populist right-wing Brexit hopefuls kick away the future of young Britons. I'm centrist and pragmatic in most of my views and it makes me angry seeing we have no one to oppose this madness.

    • @drunkensailor112
      @drunkensailor112 Рік тому +4

      And the UK economy is the only economy whose gdp in 2022 is still lower than in 2019. Yeah that's right even countries like Romania have recovered gdp past Corona.

    • @stitch77100
      @stitch77100 Рік тому +1

      @@drunkensailor112 and at the beginning of 2023 too... (I believe Romania has though, good for them)

  • @paulgilson2347
    @paulgilson2347 Рік тому +33

    I genuinely can't think of one way it will benefit us, but can think of plenty it has hurt us.

    • @EnglishroG
      @EnglishroG Рік тому +1

      The only thing I can think of is it gets the UK out of the ludicrous Common Agricultural Policy, a notorious and extremely expensive EU scheme that used to produce "wine lakes" and "butter mountains" and more recently has paid farmers for leaving their land uncultivated.

    • @borderfox2
      @borderfox2 Рік тому +4

      @@EnglishroG but where is the evidence of this ?

    • @remcovanek2
      @remcovanek2 Рік тому +3

      @@borderfox2 there is none because it is untrue.

    • @getoverit123
      @getoverit123 Рік тому

      Escaping the left

    • @paulgilson2347
      @paulgilson2347 Рік тому

      @@getoverit123 what? You do know we have a left wing party in this country yeah?

  • @alanh2179
    @alanh2179 2 роки тому +66

    Now there is a man still expecting his unicorn.

    • @davidgreen6490
      @davidgreen6490 2 роки тому +2

      As soon as you use the unicorn argument you are labelled a James O"Brienist and rightly ignored.

    • @simonbilling2796
      @simonbilling2796 2 роки тому +3

      Green and boring jog on you won some much needed poverty?

    • @robtyman4281
      @robtyman4281 2 роки тому +8

      ​@@davidgreen6490 we need more James O'Briens to keep taking the government to task...... because Labour aren't doing this for reasons only they know.

    • @gloin10
      @gloin10 2 роки тому +1

      @@davidgreen6490
      "As soon as you use the unicorn argument you are labelled a James O"Brienist and rightly ignored"?
      Really?
      Are you then?
      And when this fact free claim become an accepted rule of public debate in the UK?
      Outside your strange little universette, that is?

    • @htlein
      @htlein 2 роки тому +1

      @@davidgreen6490 best go on his program and lend your views directly. - whether you label the gaffs in one way or another - if you are suggesting by the comment "As soon as you use the unicorn argument you are labelled a James O"Brienist and rightly ignored" that the labelling of a subject or attitude has to be judged by its nomenclature - you are quite missing the point!

  • @hoegild1
    @hoegild1 Рік тому +18

    Amazing! 10 seconds in, and the Brexiteer manages to insult the audience AND declare, that they are against him! Done in a debate, where he tries to persuaded them that he is a good guy, doing the right things! Dont they teach rhetorics in posh English schools?

    • @Mightypi
      @Mightypi Рік тому

      He did have a very good go at it.

    • @ShankarSivarajan
      @ShankarSivarajan Рік тому +1

      He was right: they were 2 to 1 against him.

    • @johngalt227
      @johngalt227 Місяць тому

      He's just an extremist in a suit

  • @anapombeiro2411
    @anapombeiro2411 Рік тому +13

    Where has this first speaker been living since 2016? The dooms day didn't happen but neither did the unicorns arrive, wait until border checks for goods coming from the EU are imposed as per WTO rules. Thank you DG for bringing some sanity to the floor.

    • @flitsertheo
      @flitsertheo 10 місяців тому

      Death by a thousand cuts. That is what awaits the UK with every new Third Country rule being applied by the EU.

  • @JamesKerLindsay
    @JamesKerLindsay 2 роки тому +7

    The argument that the EU is undemocratic, the point made by Professor Tombs, is absolutely and demonstrable false. In almost every way, it is in fact far more democratic than Britain. The idea that it is run by unelected bureaucrats is rubbish and shows a profound lack of understanding about how the EU is structured. The problem is that because many British can’t be bothered to understand the EU, and believe that Britain’s system must be superior, they think it must be undemocratic. And the supreme irony is that he sitting next to Hannan, an appointed British law maker for life.

    • @susannehartl3067
      @susannehartl3067 2 роки тому +1

      Thanks Professor! It is unbelievable that it is still necessary to explain the EU's democratic constitution and the legislative process. Will they ever learn?

  • @TribalmonkeyS
    @TribalmonkeyS 2 роки тому +60

    Dominic Grieve very good
    overwhelmed here with objections to the first guys assertions. what a load of misinformation that I think he actually believes.
    1. scotland didn't increase support for union straight after the vote
    2. trade deals are terrible and were so quick as we gave them everything they wanted.
    3. the negative predictions I heard are all happening now
    4. the balance of pros and cons are not even slightly balanced as its all negatives
    5. we are less globally influential now . more little England

    • @TAHeap
      @TAHeap 2 роки тому +8

      "overwhelmed here with objections to the first guys assertions. what a load of misinformation that I think he actually believes.
      "1. scotland didn't increase support for union straight after the vote "
      Yes, it's Hannan. He's happy to just make stuff up with no actual relationship to reality.
      A classic example is an article he wrote for the 'Telegraph' (November 12th, 2008, now deleted!) explaining that because the EU had changed its "rules specifying the maximum permitted curvature of bananas" that meant that everything the Eurosceptics claimed was true. Perhaps he is just too thick to understand the difference between having standards for classification of different grades of wholesale produce in order to make markets function more smoothly and "rules" specifying what is allowed to be sold or not, but that really isn't the point, here.
      The *point* is that -in spite of these changes being reported in the 'Telegraph' a few weeks earlier- no changes to the standards in question had actually taken place! None of the stuff that he wrote about actually happened in reality!
      The *point* is that Hannan was an MEP - the person actually *paid to represent the interests of the UK* in the EU and to vote on legislative proposals in the Parliament on behalf of his constituents. And yet, here he is in the 'Telegraph' writing made-up polemic in support of his own obsessions about completely non-existent content from regulations upon which *he* was the person supposed to have voted on our behalf. One could hardly ask for a clearer demonstration of being completely unfit for public office and abusing his position.
      And the bananas, etc.? You don't hear so much about those things, these days...
      We still buy bananas (and other produce) following exactly the same classifications as before and will continue to do so indefinitely. There is no prospect of any change whatsoever and, even if the UK wanted to change them (and there is no reason nor demand to do so in reality) it would be impossible.
      Why? Because pretty much the entire world produces to the standards and classifications specified by the 'Codex Alimentarius' so that's what is available! In short, these things are no longer regulated by the EU but by a global body ... whose rules are pretty much word-for-word identical to the former EU standards. What Brexit has changed is that the UK standing now has far less influence or control over those standards than it did as an EU member.

    • @mariaescosura3972
      @mariaescosura3972 2 роки тому

      @@TAHeap Hannan is the master manipulator behind the whole concept of UK being better off alone. He fed false truths, like the bananas example, into people's minds so they came to believe that they could have ' our country back'. Where did the country went? What he meant by 'to get back control' is to get the empire back. Allowing immigrants from India so the curry houses can survive and thrive in numbers is legitimate. So there you have it folks- curry houses are to solve all the country's staff shortages🙃

  • @TheMatthooks
    @TheMatthooks Рік тому +45

    We've given more visas because we've had to. Because the large numbers of seasonal workers from the euro zone have been stopped, we now need to administer huge numbers of expensive and bureaucratic visas. Are the people coming from different places? Of course not. It's just made getting people more difficult and expensive. Increasing the cost of food to the customer.

    • @m3r810
      @m3r810 Рік тому

      Europeans are not coming anymore ,if u would go in real world jobs you ll see alot of pakistans ,nigerians and indians (difference they are entirely diffrent uneducated ,lazy and diffrent way of living in general )

    • @Happin3ess
      @Happin3ess Рік тому

      Why do so many brits still travel to Europe? If they hate Europe so much?

    • @S-u-p-a
      @S-u-p-a Рік тому +1

      Yeah but Bojo was happy

  • @shaunh5316
    @shaunh5316 Рік тому +10

    Interesting how the two journalists in the audience (BBC and The Express) were unable to articulate questions in a Q&A session and just made lengthy statements outlining their personal experiences / worldview.

  • @sailor67duilio27
    @sailor67duilio27 2 роки тому +4

    Prof, the UK is out of the EU, just deal with it. Being a 3rd country sucks.

  • @SkyTechLover
    @SkyTechLover 2 роки тому +64

    The first speaker said all the time that Brexit is not soooo bad. I thought Brexit was to be Great not to be not soooo bad.

    • @simonclare100
      @simonclare100 2 роки тому +4

      You'll never know as brexit hasn't happened fully, one foot in and one foot out is not brexit

    • @SkyTechLover
      @SkyTechLover 2 роки тому

      @@simonclare100 ​ @Simon Clare Uk can't move to the Pacific Ocean, So Uk is and always will be here. In Europe. Your fairyland is just a fairyland. As soon your head understands that the UK cannot move and it is not an Empire Anymore better for your head.
      Brexit is done, BOJO is the most extreme Brexiteer. If you want something else will never come. Because the something else you are looking for will be a devastation for the UK so will be a devastation for you and your family.

    • @SkyTechLover
      @SkyTechLover 2 роки тому

      @@simonclare100 Also I know very well that Brexit now has become a cult a religion. So your head is hard to change from it. It doesn't matter the facts the numbers. You will always find something to say that BREXIT is not done and blah blah blah.

    • @simonclare100
      @simonclare100 2 роки тому

      @@SkyTechLover unfortunately you don'

    • @simonclare100
      @simonclare100 2 роки тому

      You don't understand very much

  • @Milo-wl2if
    @Milo-wl2if Рік тому +12

    Daniel Hannan is the most disingenous Brexit whisperer.

    • @dogwithwigwamz.7320
      @dogwithwigwamz.7320 Місяць тому

      I wouldn`t put it quite like that. Take BoJo. He`s not a Brexiter. Very shortly before he decided that he was a Brexiter he was talking about how ludicrous it would be to turn one`s back on the buisness that lies on our doorstep in favour of lands half way across the world and further...
      No ! He saw that the price of his Premiership was the cost of selling the country. There was a never a time in that entitled lad`s head where the country would come first.

  • @andimcgaw
    @andimcgaw Рік тому +5

    Daniel Hannan doesn't like facts and can't handle the truth. He even went after the host. That's what happens when you know you've lost

  • @matteomagurno3068
    @matteomagurno3068 2 роки тому +17

    Hi Intelligence Squared, could you please make subtitles available for this video? I’m sure many others need subtitles too. Much appreciated.

    • @kfhroe8262
      @kfhroe8262 2 роки тому +2

      UA-cam will add them, with time.

    • @matteomagurno3068
      @matteomagurno3068 2 роки тому

      @@kfhroe8262 I wasn’t aware of that, thank you. I was wondering too if they could take the time to put the subtitles themselves.

    • @kfhroe8262
      @kfhroe8262 2 роки тому

      @@matteomagurno3068 It is expensive...

    • @RobVespa
      @RobVespa 2 роки тому +2

      @@kfhroe8262 - No, it isn't. It can be automatically done via technology. Even if it were done by hand, which isn't necessary, it's not that large of a task. Granted, you can pay a lot for any service. That's true.

    • @CrazyInsanelikeafox
      @CrazyInsanelikeafox 2 роки тому +1

      It now has subtitles.

  • @rocarolan2003
    @rocarolan2003 2 роки тому +5

    How many lies can you put in 9 minutes Danial Hannan. Jesus they learnt Notting.

  • @miakeogh6844
    @miakeogh6844 Рік тому +4

    The EU were delighted to see the back of the English because they are not and never were team players and spent most of their time in the the democraticly elected parliament decisions are made by the 27 EU counties together a word the English hav great difficulty with

  • @tomscottjet
    @tomscottjet 2 роки тому +70

    Disappointed to see yet another discussion of the B word where both proponent and opponent treat Northern Ireland as a footnote of the debate.

    • @lfcgero35
      @lfcgero35 Рік тому +1

      Exactly considering where we are at today but lets be honest the tories couldnt careless about northern ireland. Remember boris promising the unionist businessmen there would be no sea border that work out well. All the people boris made promises to are all coming back to haunt him now. He has put the uk in a position that even ex colonies can come looking for their pound of flesh.

    • @stuartbrown3070
      @stuartbrown3070 Рік тому +5

      It is a footnote. It'd be like centring the debate on Jersey or Guernsey.

    • @tomboyle4312
      @tomboyle4312 Рік тому

      @@stuartbrown3070 Or farmers...

    • @uingaeoc3905
      @uingaeoc3905 Рік тому

      But you do not put the blame squarely on the May Remainer Parliament 2017-19 not to allow a No Deal Exit without the 'Back Stop' or NIP.
      The result would be that the UK would still be in the EU as members today and the democratic decision ignored.

    • @tomscottjet
      @tomscottjet Рік тому +2

      @@uingaeoc3905 there's blame to be shared in a plethora of places: the politicians who dismissed concerns as "project fear", the Remain campaigners who didn't get the message home of the impact it would have on NI, the charlatans who continue to espouse that the GFA and Brexit process are compatible, May's confidence and supply with the DUP (a party not representative of a majority of the people of NI on this issue), and the criminal in Downing St who promised "no border on the Irish Sea" with no intention of keeping that promise. And the English political establishment who are unionist in name but only in action when it is politically expedient.

  • @maxwild1212
    @maxwild1212 2 роки тому +76

    “Absolutely nobody is talking about threatening our place in the Single Market”
    - Daniel Hannan MEP, 2015

    • @p.g.u.d
      @p.g.u.d 2 роки тому +2

      Daniel knew his position was not the default one. He said this before the referendum.
      It became very clear that we could not stay inside the SM. SM membership is part of the EU treaties, and leaving the EU means ending the treaties. This is set out in article 50.
      you can keep whining about this but it makes no difference. It's just sour grapes.

    • @maxwild1212
      @maxwild1212 2 роки тому +13

      @@p.g.u.d When did he say this? Could you provide a source?
      "It became very clear that we could not stay inside the SM."
      Nope, not correct. We could quite easily have stayed inside the SM. The EU offered as much.

    • @p.g.u.d
      @p.g.u.d 2 роки тому

      @@maxwild1212 Watch this very video and listen to what he SAYS.
      He explains it.

    • @p.g.u.d
      @p.g.u.d 2 роки тому

      @@maxwild1212
      I am not interested in getting into any dispute and I have NO INTEREST in acceding to the EU.
      So DO NOT ATTEMPT TO DRAW ME ON IT.
      I will ignore ALL such attempts.

    • @davidpryle3935
      @davidpryle3935 2 роки тому +5

      @@maxwild1212 The U.K. had to leave the single market to stop free movement of labour. It’s why the working class voted to leave. It’s not that difficult to understand. There are more opinions than Daniel Hannan’s.

  • @Garcwyn
    @Garcwyn 2 роки тому +13

    How come Daniel Hannan is invited to these things is beyond belief

    • @achapmaninhk
      @achapmaninhk 2 роки тому +1

      Why?

    • @nicholasnunhofer8501
      @nicholasnunhofer8501 2 роки тому +1

      Why??

    • @gianlucacorona6585
      @gianlucacorona6585 2 роки тому +3

      @@nicholasnunhofer8501 "No one is talking about leaving the single market". Lol.

    • @Garcwyn
      @Garcwyn 2 роки тому

      @@gianlucacorona6585 exactly. Should have been abundantly clear that the credibility of this guy is non-existent

  • @Simon-dg2rx
    @Simon-dg2rx Рік тому +6

    How stupid we were to leave the union. We shot ourselves in the foot.

  • @danellis-jones1591
    @danellis-jones1591 Рік тому +8

    Economically the biggest mistake ever.

    • @ominousparallel3854
      @ominousparallel3854 Рік тому

      How so?
      Given the chronic low growth in the EU and the biblical energy crisis they’re about to experience, I seriously doubt leaving would be a long term blow.

    • @danellis-jones1591
      @danellis-jones1591 Рік тому +1

      @@ominousparallel3854 Because we are cut off from frictionless trade with the richest trading bloc in the world. Because we're now in a desperate place to get trade deals signed, and every country in the world knows it, so we're likely (and already have) to sign trade deals where we get screwed. That sets up systemic economic pain for decades. The independent OFR has said brexit will cost the UK over 4% of GDP.
      There are many other reasons people voted to leave (none I agree with, some I have sympathy for), but purely economically it's a disaster

    • @ominousparallel3854
      @ominousparallel3854 Рік тому

      @@danellis-jones1591 this is such a bizarre statement, bordering panic with no empirical ground.
      Italy’s growth has been a disaster since it joined the Euro. So have been Spai and Greece.
      On the other hand Switzerland is doing very fine outside the EU.
      Based on these I am not sure why being member on the EU correlates with economic success.
      In which part of which trade deal have we been ‘screwed’?

    • @danellis-jones1591
      @danellis-jones1591 Рік тому +1

      @@ominousparallel3854 The Australian trade deal is great for Australia. Crap for the UK. This is because tgecUK is in a position of weakness when negotiating these deals. Also we have no expertise. The Australian trade negotiators have decades of tough negotiating experience.
      Using today's economic data for Europe is not very clever. Firstly all of Europe has rebounded from covid much better than the UK. And all Western countries are in the same boat atm. But as time goes in we'll see that the UK fundamentally poorer because it's sold itself to various countries via these bad trade deals, and our trade with the EU has dropped off a cliff. Which it already has

    • @ominousparallel3854
      @ominousparallel3854 Рік тому

      @@danellis-jones1591 speculation, hear say, and bogus reasoning. What is ‘crap’ in the Australian trade deal exactly? Can we be precise?
      Italy had very low growth over last 25 years. Facts. Switzerland doing very well. Facts. Not just looking the last few years, bu much longer than that.
      Evidence evidence and more evidence please.

  • @thepenguinmafia
    @thepenguinmafia Рік тому +4

    Does Daniel not know that we... didn't leave the EU in 2016? Since actually leaving Kent *has* become a car park, growth *has* been far lower than comparable EU nations. It just happened in 20/21 rather than 16/17.

  • @htlein
    @htlein 2 роки тому +16

    third speaker again - the EU is secretive? And how can one be secretive when ALL is open - he obviously has NO idea how elections are held, what the difference is between first past the post and gerrymandering as opposed to proportional representation. Rules and then even laws are subject to scrutiny in the EU parliament and even then individual member states take those rules into their own laws as they wish (the UK refused to enact 57 of such rules when we were inside the EU!

  • @sailor67duilio27
    @sailor67duilio27 2 роки тому +4

    Question how many ukrainian refugees are in the EU and how many are in the UK, that will answer a lot about the uk

    • @tobymaltby6036
      @tobymaltby6036 Рік тому

      ...several people I know are still awaiting their Ukranian Refugees they agreed to take in to their homes months ago...

  • @MrJhoskarson
    @MrJhoskarson Рік тому +38

    If we ( 🇬🇧) are the best model of democracy comparing to EU, let’s then allow Northern Irland and Scottish to choose their destiny …SCOTLAND INDEPENDENCE AND PROTECTION OF NI PROTOCOL THAT WESTMINSTER WANT TO SCRAP UNILATERALLY

    • @paul1979uk2000
      @paul1979uk2000 Рік тому +9

      As a Brit, I actually consider the UK and US democracy to be some of the weakest in the western world with its first past the post, mainly two party system and regional groupings which tends to ignore a lot of our votes.
      The EU isn't perfect but I have more faith in them then I do in the UK government with everything they've been going on the last 5 or so years.
      As for Scotland and Northern Ireland, a true democracy wouldn't have any issues with them having a voice on if they want to stay or leave and in fact should be able to have a voice at their choosing, clearly thought, we've got Westminster trying to dictate terms and block a referendum in Scotland and you have to wonder how would the Brexiteers react to that if the EU did the same to the UK on the Brexit referendum, I think they would go ape, but then the EU is a lot smarter than this current UK government.

    • @MrJhoskarson
      @MrJhoskarson Рік тому +3

      @@paul1979uk2000 spot on 👍🏽

    • @UkSapyy
      @UkSapyy Рік тому

      @@paul1979uk2000 The UK government started this by being the most democratic nation in the Western world. They put a vote to the public. The EU doesn't allow the general public anywhere near their final decision-making processes.

    • @williamstewart888
      @williamstewart888 Рік тому

      YEP, and, as to the guy with the "yorkie" wife??? say it in good auld plain AngloSaxon!!! you know, inglish German!! like George!!! (German) Scotland was and IS right!!! ps(are we now in the UQ?????? tell me someone, just what is , e, (United) about this, er, (Upside down now) UQ??????????

  • @spiritualanarchist8162
    @spiritualanarchist8162 2 роки тому +15

    That third speaker is saying he was surprised that 'The E.U was such fierce negotiater because Britain is their 'main protector. ' . That doesn't make any sense. By leaving the E.U, Britain became the economical competition of the E.U .So offcourse they negotiated hard.

    • @christopherchessum7439
      @christopherchessum7439 2 роки тому +1

      He didn't actually say that. Listen again. Moreover, economies compete even within the EU.

  • @htlein
    @htlein 2 роки тому +34

    Which polls are we talking about in France? Wo commissioned the polls? No mention of other polls which show French citizens will never leave the Eu and see continued participation as an advantage - even le Penn does not advocate leaving the EU now!

    • @johnjeanb
      @johnjeanb 2 роки тому +18

      Frenchman here: Brexit demonstrated to all Europe it was a disaster to leave the EU. Le Pen (and others) advocated that all troubles came from the EU (sounds familiar?) but now, they ALL have second thoughts. Thank you Britain, it is one rare time recently when you enlighten the world. Yes, the EU is not perfect but look at the UK and its lack of democracy one chamber is not elected, the PM is elected by buddies, no written constitution. In fact, today, Johnson has all the powers to do what he wants. You could call this a dictature of a few over the vast majority of Britons.

    • @ellied.violet7372
      @ellied.violet7372 2 роки тому +1

      @@johnjeanb Bon soir jjb! Probably carrying coals to Newcastle but nevertheless: do vote tomorrow! Every vote counts.
      Greetings from Paris (today)

    • @jugbywellington1134
      @jugbywellington1134 2 роки тому

      @@johnjeanb Brexit has demonstrated no such thing, but my friends in the EU say the media have done their best to portray it as such. Sorry to burst your bubble, but if, for example, we in the UK believed the BBC/Guardian, we would believe our future is very dark. There's a very good reason why both these biased sources of "news" are struggling to survive. It sounds as though you take your mainstream media at face value. I suggest you investigate the work of Joseph P Farrell, an American, and broaden your perspective. The EU is controlled by Germany and does not promise you the bright future you appear to imagine. Before you say it; no, I don't hate Germany, but it appears the "losers" of WW2 have actually won and, even better, have some of you in their subjected nations as their most ardent supporters.

    • @johnjeanb
      @johnjeanb 2 роки тому +4

      @@jugbywellington1134 So everything is fine for you in the UK? Perfect. Here in France we don't have big problems i reassure you in case you were worrying. That old "divide and conqueer British approach to things is funny (nothing beats teasing a French about Germany?) Your clock is 70 years behind. I live in France, I have lived in Germany and all this is BS. Yes we have problems, gas is getting expensive, inflation is now 5% and will reduce by the end of the year. Without any doubt I prefer living here than in little England. So all is well.

    • @jugbywellington1134
      @jugbywellington1134 2 роки тому +1

      @@johnjeanb I'm happy to hear it, but don't say nobody warned you. Some of us also keep an eye on the future.

  • @dreampedaller2113
    @dreampedaller2113 2 роки тому +14

    Leavers still arguing using lies....

  • @nonamenameless5495
    @nonamenameless5495 Рік тому +42

    In my book at least, Stella Creasy totally mopped the floor with a very concise, hard hitting speech followed up by great direct answers to the questions - outstanding! I m not a Brit, never heard her name before so I genuinely don t know about her track record but her speech and answers were of the kind that I d qualify as impressive, fact based, straight to the point without beating around the bush.

    • @anindyamajumdar4088
      @anindyamajumdar4088 Рік тому +1

      Ah yezzz!
      Reciprocal checks on EU goods is the a brilliant move !
      TO ESCALATE A TRADE WAR WITH THE EU .
      Are three lectures from Leads specialize in comedy???!

    • @LeDoctorBones
      @LeDoctorBones Рік тому +2

      @MulhorandPrince Playing the "Hitler card" is actually a known rhetorical trick I learned from public speaking. We specifically learned to never do it, since it signifies you've lost the debate since you have no actually valid arguments left.

  • @minivaughan1
    @minivaughan1 Рік тому +14

    Terrible argument at 7:59. "Immigration hasn't been discouraged because the number of visa applications have increased."
    Uh, yeah, because now Europeans need visas to get in? I can't believe that when you end freedom of movement, more people apply for visas. But I'll wager the rise in visa applications is far, far less than the amount of people from the EU who would have entered the UK, but were put off by the barriers we erected. Whether that's a good or a bad thing is up to you, but it's certainly a shoddy argument.

  • @Michiel_de_Jong
    @Michiel_de_Jong 2 роки тому +64

    Short Brexit summary;
    Daniel had to defend it by stating: "It isn't as bad as some has claimed it would be."
    Robert had to defend it by stating lies, insinuations and unsubstantiated allegations.

    • @jamesscottvideos
      @jamesscottvideos 2 роки тому +3

      Politicians are always lying. Where was the big economic shock after voting to leave?

    • @Michiel_de_Jong
      @Michiel_de_Jong 2 роки тому +26

      @@jamesscottvideos | The value of the pound dropped with 7% in the two days that followed and never recovered from it. The following years the investments decreased by about 20%. A number of companies and institutes left the UK. Than Brexit happened after 4 years. It caused trade to go down by about 15%, import as well as export. Prices in the UK for food went up. Currently concerning inflation the UK is among the highest, economic growth among the lowest, and relative to comparable nations (Germany, France, Benelux, US, Canada) the UK is estimated to have lost about 5,2% of its GDP. That's 142B/year.
      It wasn't a bang,.. it is a train crash in slow motion.

    • @jamesscottvideos
      @jamesscottvideos 2 роки тому +3

      @@Michiel_de_Jong The value of the pound vs the Euro went up in 2016 and has stayed up. I don't accept your figures.

    • @jamesscottvideos
      @jamesscottvideos 2 роки тому +2

      @btwgrfqfeqfew To suggest the pandemic was not the actual cause, despite the directly measurable costs of lockdown, mass testing & vaccination, is just the dumbest thing. The shock from Brexit was supposed to come immediately after the vote. It didn't, and now you blame the cost of pandemic on Brexit. What a joke!

    • @Michiel_de_Jong
      @Michiel_de_Jong 2 роки тому +11

      @@jamesscottvideos | That's what the Daily Express told you. In the real world the Pound lost 10% in value after the Referendum and *never* recovered.

  • @alexvince461
    @alexvince461 2 роки тому +8

    Never give a serious decision to a gammon

  • @MrG.42
    @MrG.42 Рік тому +4

    Will Self was correct when he said "Not everyone who voted for Brexit was a racist, but everyone who was a racist, voted for Brexit!"

    • @jedjones9047
      @jedjones9047 Рік тому

      Will self is a raccist of the worst kind.

  • @fuchiaimperfect2093
    @fuchiaimperfect2093 Рік тому +1

    A lot of grandiose statements being made, but the crucial test is 'Has leaving benefitted ordinary people?' And the answer is 'NO' - not one bit. It was a confidence trick. Con artists are well-known for their persuasive speech. Hannan was a master at that, but he didn't fool me.

  • @brianmacadam4793
    @brianmacadam4793 2 роки тому +25

    The UK economy had outgrown the EU zone is a statement that requires CONTEXT ! A large portion of that growth was to "stock up" for the upcoming trade break-up. Further, while there wasn't a huge "crash"; there has indeed been an enormous cost to the UK both in lost GDP, lost investment, the loss of entire industries, and the loss of Financial influence in the City of London. TRILLIONS of financial investment has been shifted to the EU and that will erode the City in the long run.

    • @netteundgut
      @netteundgut 2 роки тому

      That's my point too, Brian you are a person with normal and full brain. Ask me what the other brain is. It is An empty brain that is full with noise, and as German would call it Märchen or Story.

    • @fredatlas4396
      @fredatlas4396 2 роки тому +3

      The UK economy hasn't really gone anywhere since the 2010 election

    • @accountreality1988
      @accountreality1988 2 роки тому +1

      @@fredatlas4396 i feel no less richer or poorer since the late 2000s when i started working.

    • @fredatlas4396
      @fredatlas4396 2 роки тому +2

      @@accountreality1988 lucky you. Do you live with your parents and not have to pay any bills

    • @mogznwaz
      @mogznwaz 2 роки тому +2

      Wrong. The City is doing just fine and attempts by the EU to force traders to move have failed . I also noted that the EU is attempting to refuse equivalence to the UK which it has granted to the Americans . Surely this is a. A violation of fair competition law b. Indicative of the EUs malevolence c. indicative of the EUs fear of competition

  • @laverite6427
    @laverite6427 Рік тому +26

    Ask the fishermen who are in a very precarious economic situation and according to an internet documentary they say they were visited and deceived by Boris Johnson. Now, to maintain the fishing quota, fish are imported from Iceland and Norway at a very high cost.

    • @colinmcclymont
      @colinmcclymont Рік тому +3

      Farmers [oo

    • @engineeringvision9507
      @engineeringvision9507 Рік тому +3

      Ah yes, a documentary by the Guardian with a sample size of 3. Very science. Such impartial!

    • @alexiskiri9693
      @alexiskiri9693 Рік тому +7

      @@engineeringvision9507 glad to here how wonderful Brexit is going for you. What do you do? Smuggling or money laundering?

  • @joeduffy3309
    @joeduffy3309 9 місяців тому +2

    The fact you are still debating it 7 years later answers the question.

  • @jorrittimmers8066
    @jorrittimmers8066 Рік тому +9

    I feel it is brave of all panelists to participate in the debate. It is so important to have this debate in our living rooms as well

    • @dopeheaddude9651
      @dopeheaddude9651 Рік тому

      @Simon John to save the tax havens and tax loophole......there was no EU army debunked

  • @MH7919
    @MH7919 2 роки тому +9

    No one on this panel understands the economy. Just a look at the £ will tell you how bad it is. You have to live in a parallel universe not to see the harm of this to most ordinary people and that is just the beginning.

    • @MH7919
      @MH7919 Рік тому

      @@sirhumphreyappleby6498 I like your power of analysis Sir

  • @gordonlam60
    @gordonlam60 2 роки тому +8

    If being independent is such a great thing, would Boris grant Scotland and Northern Island the rights to decide their own fates?

    • @christopherchessum7439
      @christopherchessum7439 2 роки тому +1

      They've already been given that chance. They decided to stay.

    • @gordonlam60
      @gordonlam60 2 роки тому

      @@christopherchessum7439 they now regret and want to have another chance.

    • @kevt3318
      @kevt3318 2 роки тому

      Scotland argued that a hard border in N.I would be bad if we left the EU.
      Scotland would have the same issue.

    • @kevt3318
      @kevt3318 2 роки тому

      ​@@gordonlam60 I'm Scottish, no Scotland doesn't regret it, the SNP does.

    • @gordonlam60
      @gordonlam60 2 роки тому

      @@kevt3318 is SNP Scottish?

  • @DekkardBryon
    @DekkardBryon Рік тому +4

    Amazing, a Lord criticising the Eu over a lack of democracy.

  • @williamfence566
    @williamfence566 2 роки тому +9

    Irrespective of your politics I always thought division / hate and isolation is a poor substitute to communication / compromise and inclusion in all aspects of life. We had a voice and an influence in the decision making of a important part of the global market place and threw it away. Generations will never understand.

    • @deanunio
      @deanunio 2 роки тому +1

      Australia, Canada, New Zealand all do fine not in a block. Can still compromise and communicate if you choose to

  • @7jonny77
    @7jonny77 2 роки тому +41

    He said in the opening statement "go back to our very damp and beautiful Island"
    NI is not on that Island - remember. That speaks a thousand words

    • @SirAntoniousBlock
      @SirAntoniousBlock 2 роки тому +9

      The simple fact is Britain cannot leave the EU completely while it continues to occupy part of a country that is still in it.

    • @Oluinneachain
      @Oluinneachain 2 роки тому +4

      Ah but it is Brexit not UKexit!

    • @888Caz
      @888Caz 2 роки тому

      @@Oluinneachain May I ask, wouldn't that mean that Britain was never in the EUROPA UNION CORPORATION from the beginning? Only the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION?

    • @Oluinneachain
      @Oluinneachain 2 роки тому +2

      @@888Caz ?

    • @Oluinneachain
      @Oluinneachain 2 роки тому

      @@888CazBritain is a geographic entity. UK is a polity.

  • @htlein
    @htlein 2 роки тому +11

    what has the opinion of how the covid epidemic was handled to do with the FACT that we are now about 14 on the roll-out list? That our government wasted tens of billions on useless PPE and track and trace? That the governance of epidemic was in accordance with existing EU regulations (as admitted by our own chief medical person!). The Eu has 27 partners involved in the Ukraine problem - each county however is acting as it will wish to - and THAT has NOTHING to do with the EU! The UK has been left out of most strategic talks because we are not trusted!

    • @joeyfotofr
      @joeyfotofr 2 роки тому

      Money spent on PPE is not wasted. It is not a magic bullet as is the highly effective MRNA vaccine, which appeared more quickly & more powerfully beyond anyone's ability predict it. PPE saved lives, especially among the more vulnerable.

    • @htlein
      @htlein 2 роки тому

      @@joeyfotofr "Money spent on PPE is not wasted" Perhaps you did not bother to investigate the people who were given contracts by the government who admitted they knew nothing of PPE and simply used the internet to buy overpriced and low grade equipment? The BILLIONS that were wasted due to tory cronyism was never investigated by any select committee because Johnson used "special powers" to grant such contracts to tory supporters and friends. You are absurdly naive if you believe hat the NHS could not have done far better

    • @joeyfotofr
      @joeyfotofr 2 роки тому

      No money misspent on the incompetent production of sub-standard PPE was certainly wasted. My response to your sentence was as a career public health person, and not to your intention. Of course i agree with that, but isn't that what UK gets for electing a gang of entitled schoolmates - good talkers who underperform. Since Labor is braindead so to actually roll back the grand old crock of Thatcherism is out of the question; can't UK find a few competent but less colorful middle managers to, at least, keep the ball moving. I mean, Boris is a laugh a minute ( and even though I don't live there i come from the nation that elected Trump) really does governance need to be this unsatisfactory?

  • @oaesan
    @oaesan Рік тому +11

    "I was told if I don't stop smoking, I won't live up to 30, now I'm 40, so I was right to continue smoking." Just because the worse case scenarios of Brexit did not materialise immediately doesn't mean they were wrong. It only meant the can could be kicked down the road.

  • @whocares264
    @whocares264 Рік тому +30

    Now we have less people in work
    Now we have High inflation
    Now we have a pound worth 20% less
    Now we have food wastage
    Now we have travel restrictions
    Now we have shortages
    Now we must trade with countries 10000 miles away
    Now we have worker shortages

    • @monza10184
      @monza10184 Рік тому

      it was a lie by Johnson to get elected FULL STOP thats all

    • @rugbykiwi9
      @rugbykiwi9 Рік тому +1

      unemployment is at the lowest it has ever been in 50 years you fool. Get your facts before commenting. So how can you say we have less people in work?

    • @whocares264
      @whocares264 Рік тому +11

      @@rugbykiwi9 unemployment is low, BUT there are less people in work, oh dear i am going to have to explain , people have taken early retirement , this is unsustainable , this is like talking to children.....

    • @rugbykiwi9
      @rugbykiwi9 Рік тому

      @@whocares264 please enlighten us on why employment is the lowest it has been in 50 years but less are working. Has there been a huge population decrease that no one knows about?

    • @rugbykiwi9
      @rugbykiwi9 Рік тому

      And let me talk about inflation. What about 1975, inflation was extremely high and uk had just joined the eu? In fact the inflation between 1975 and 1990 was on average higher than after we left the eu. You are embarrassing yourself here, please stop trying and go back to school.

  • @abdiumar8641
    @abdiumar8641 2 роки тому +15

    Fellow going on and on about democracy? Does he mean Netherlands, Denmark, France, have no democracy? If democracy only works at a small national level, what of Scotland and Ireland ... are they not then in a dictatorship of UK?

    • @robatkinson8746
      @robatkinson8746 2 роки тому +2

      No, they are in a parliamentary democracy rather than an autocratic union that is run by an executive that meets in secret.

    • @mogznwaz
      @mogznwaz 2 роки тому

      The UK is one nation moron, it’s more similar to German federalism. EU law overrides national laws so in effect France etc have no real say in their laws anymore - the peoples wishes no longer matter

    • @yvesclinquart6031
      @yvesclinquart6031 2 роки тому

      Just for your information, all changes in the constitution in eu countries need 2/3 of votes. In uk only 50% of the parlement is need.

    • @tobymaltby6036
      @tobymaltby6036 Рік тому

      I note that you say "the Netherlands" and not Holland.
      Most Brits wouldn't get the significance, sadly....

    • @ominousparallel3854
      @ominousparallel3854 Рік тому

      Netherlands and France voted no to the constitutional treaty and got it anyway labelled as the Lisbon treaty with minor differences. So yes the way the EU behaved is highly questionable on the democratic front.

  • @philodonoghue3062
    @philodonoghue3062 2 роки тому +10

    See what a difference a knowledgeable, competent and fair chairman of a debate makes.

    • @SciFiGrinch
      @SciFiGrinch 2 роки тому +1

      I take it that comment is sarcastic. Just measured in time of answers the anti-brexit side had a clear advantage which was allowed by the moderator.

    • @1972hermanoben
      @1972hermanoben Рік тому

      @@SciFiGrinch I wouldn’t have thought so. Possibly, the Pro side felt they’d said all that needed saying in less time, brevity being the soul of wit etc. In any case, the Pro side won the swing of votes by a factor of 10% of the voters - I don’t see anything for the Pro side to be unhappy about, other than that the audience comprised a higher proportion of Anti voters, who appear not to have adjusted their opinions as a consequence of hearing both sides’ arguments. You won - get over it.

    • @SciFiGrinch
      @SciFiGrinch Рік тому

      @@1972hermanoben Nothing to get over, I was just making an observation on the moderation of the debate.

    • @maralynmitchell8261
      @maralynmitchell8261 Рік тому +2

      @@SciFiGrinch Moderation with Dominic and Stella intow ? Hysterical remainers why don't they live in the Blessed Europe ? And leave us in peace. !!

    • @xyleblack2545
      @xyleblack2545 Рік тому

      @@maralynmitchell8261 I would assume because they have a connection with their home country and it's culture. Seeing it harming itself in such a destructive way is probably a good reason for them attempting to inform people about the consequences.

  • @ralph_1802
    @ralph_1802 Рік тому +13

    My in-laws voted for Brexit and the main reason was to many foreigners. Which is very strange as they live in a village in the middle of Wiltshire and have seldom contact with these people. But are complaining that it takes for ever to be seen at the local Hospital. Funny that.

    • @alanjones4622
      @alanjones4622 Рік тому +8

      It probably now takes longer at the local hospital because all those "foreigners" doing the nursing jobs have said sod this for a game of soldiers and left the country.

    • @Malky24
      @Malky24 Рік тому

      @@alanjones4622 I think that's the point he was making.

    • @danielbtwd
      @danielbtwd Рік тому +3

      Same in France , the most nationalist elements come from upper middle class areas that never see foreigners except as workers.

    • @drunkensailor112
      @drunkensailor112 Рік тому +3

      @@danielbtwd racism and conservatism always thrives in rural areas and never in cities. It's pure xenophobia and stupidity which is why urbanism is such positive trend

  • @geraldaird9390
    @geraldaird9390 Рік тому +5

    Daniel wasn't shoved into a den of lions, it was a den of liars. I noticed he has not mentioned his previous claim that it would be madness to leave the single market.

  • @martycrow
    @martycrow 2 роки тому +39

    *A small reality check* - I am a Brit in SEAsia trying to promote trade links in certain key areas that are less capital intensive reflecting 80% of UK's economy - soft skills/soft power - such as education, training, standards, systems, IT regulation etc. Since Brexit (both the vote and the actual), UK Govt support for this type of work (organised, focussed and specific) has been declining. The local market has become sceptical of the UK - despite the market having a number of Commonwealth countries who were previously natural partners. More embarrasingly, Brits are now the butt of jokes and derision even at business-social events, while the EU reps are in confident display. Perhaps people in the UK are unaware of this and the diplomatic missions and trade delegations only feed back the good news, but frankly, it is grim.

    • @susannehartl3067
      @susannehartl3067 2 роки тому +14

      Of course they are unaware of it. Nobody reports it.

    • @mogznwaz
      @mogznwaz 2 роки тому +1

      That’s called propaganda

    • @sumguy835
      @sumguy835 2 роки тому

      หยุดแตะต้องสาวประเภทสอง จะหยุดหัวเราะ เราตระหนักดีมากกว่าที่คุณคิด งี่เง่า

    • @williamjohnston4666
      @williamjohnston4666 2 роки тому +1

      Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    • @uingaeoc3905
      @uingaeoc3905 Рік тому +2

      I see - so you are not doing your bit then? This business of being the but of jokes - strange that the European destination of choice from the FE in the things you mention is the UK.

  • @brianmacadam4793
    @brianmacadam4793 2 роки тому +19

    So the UK leaves the EU and expects "a freindly ... . Say what ? A member quits the club and then expects the perks of membership ? A spouse leaves the marriage and wants conjugal benefits ?

  • @glps6167
    @glps6167 Рік тому +3

    None of the defenders of Brexit brought up what for the 350 million Pounds not paid to Brussels were spent.

  • @jayb9779
    @jayb9779 2 роки тому +7

    Stella Creesey would be a wonderful PM of the UK. Sharp, Educated and provided DIRECT ANSWERS. Come on UK. Champion Stella Creesey for Labour leadership. Tanya Plibersek of Labour in Australia is similar to Stella Creesey. And we all know the wonderful PM of New Zealand - Jacinda Ardern. People need to wake up. Women are much more measured and talented than men when it comes to politics.

    • @tobymaltby6036
      @tobymaltby6036 Рік тому +1

      Priti Patel: exist.
      ...how does your arguement look now eh ??

  • @thomasjamison2050
    @thomasjamison2050 Рік тому +25

    Brexit will exist in economic textbooks for many decades into the future as one of the most asinine economic decisions ever made.

    • @jasonkingshott2971
      @jasonkingshott2971 Рік тому

      The EU had many opportunities to change it's ways, it wouldn't and we all know what happened next.

    • @Rejoin_2023
      @Rejoin_2023 Рік тому +3

      @@jasonkingshott2971 Yes we do, they said screw you UK and they're doing very nicely without us.

    • @jasonkingshott2971
      @jasonkingshott2971 Рік тому

      @@Rejoin_2023 You mean EU countries can make their own trading laws?

    • @thomasjamison2050
      @thomasjamison2050 Рік тому +2

      @@jasonkingshott2971 Correct. They wisely chose not to let some small jerkwater island nation push them around and then let that same nation get out of the EU so it couldn't cause anymore stupid problems for the more advanced nations of the continent.

    • @jasonkingshott2971
      @jasonkingshott2971 Рік тому

      @@thomasjamison2050 ..and the consequence played out to the delighted democrats in the UK, everyone's a winner.

  • @Luna-nj9zd
    @Luna-nj9zd Рік тому +3

    So lucky to be living i the EU where EVERYTHING is oodles better than in the UK.

  • @larryleker6366
    @larryleker6366 Рік тому +10

    If you have to publicize that you were right to do something despite all evidence to the contrary, there's a word for that: DENIAL. And you will suffer the consequences whether you like it or not.

  • @davidharbison5722
    @davidharbison5722 Рік тому +18

    As a real world person in the real world, I know many friends in business who have lost contracts with the EU, one in fact whose turnover collapsed by over 50%; it is a hidden disaster which will come home to roost in a very short time, I have spent hours today on an order to Northern Ireland which was liking sending orders to manchester prior , the order has been held up for four days. A total disaster and I voted leave

    • @geoffallibone4026
      @geoffallibone4026 Рік тому

      Yeah, but those sunlit uplands and how beautiful shagging a flag in the early morning sun.

    • @neighbourhoodmusician
      @neighbourhoodmusician Рік тому +5

      I myself have experienced it. I used to make good money selling music gear into and out of the EU and the UK. That's all disappeared. Customs cost/complexity, VAT cost, third country import duties - all of it has priced me out of the EU market and massively reduced my customer pool, hugely so.

    • @ssrmy1782
      @ssrmy1782 Рік тому +2

      The problem with people like you is that you think your personal Mercantilism supercedes other people's interest in sovereignty & self-determination. It doesn't.

    • @neighbourhoodmusician
      @neighbourhoodmusician Рік тому +8

      @@ssrmy1782 I'll enjoy all that sovereignty in my ever shrinking bank account then. I love me some ethereal self-determination for breakfast.
      The problem with people like you is that you view cooperation as capitulation. When I see some real benefit to my and my friend's and family's lives, then I'll support Brexit.

    • @williamvorkosigan5151
      @williamvorkosigan5151 Рік тому +3

      @@neighbourhoodmusician The only thing stopping a comprehensive free trade agreement between the UK and EU is the lovely, delightful, EU.

  • @ajmalsarwar2939
    @ajmalsarwar2939 2 роки тому +114

    Great to see these debates back in public in front of an audience.

    • @davidwarburton-burley9967
      @davidwarburton-burley9967 Рік тому

      It's not really a debate
      Just a continuation of Brexiters lying and misleading

    • @Arltratlo
      @Arltratlo Рік тому

      and change nothing about the xenophobic mess you call Brexshit!

    • @nikolaucznaum4312
      @nikolaucznaum4312 Рік тому

      The London bubble again🙄 Have you been to Labour-controlled Oldham? The tumbleweed town was formally the center of the industrial revolution, Manchester hanging on its coat tails. No significant EU investment there!!..

    • @davidwarburton-burley9967
      @davidwarburton-burley9967 Рік тому

      @@nikolaucznaum4312 Liverpool?

    • @nikolaucznaum4312
      @nikolaucznaum4312 Рік тому

      @@davidwarburton-burley9967 200 cotton mills in Oldham when it was in its pomp, How do think we were able to by-pass Liverpool docks with the ship canal and relegate Liverpool to 2nd division status??..🙂

  • @jamesdunn7564
    @jamesdunn7564 Рік тому +11

    Just pointing out that Robert Tombs did a sneaky tactic of lying about Ursula von der Leyen in the middle of the other 2 accusations.

    • @paullambert8183
      @paullambert8183 Рік тому +2

      What lie? At least you should say what e lie is of you are going to comment

    • @oldishandwoke-ish1181
      @oldishandwoke-ish1181 Рік тому +5

      Lying seems to be a bit of a theme with Leave diehards.

    • @jamesdunn7564
      @jamesdunn7564 Рік тому +3

      @@paullambert8183 she was cleared of plagiarism. Just had a (very) poorly written dissertation.

  • @adamgrimsley2900
    @adamgrimsley2900 Рік тому +5

    Lord Hannan...for what? It's incredible, then again Sir Gavin Williamson

  • @stemill1569
    @stemill1569 Рік тому +3

    "I'm rather be in a democratic country than in a multinational empire"
    ...isn't it Britain who is the wannabe empire?