What is Existentialism? | Jean Paul Sartre Existentialism is a Humanism

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лют 2025
  • For those looking to start reading non-fiction existentialist philosophy, Jean-Paul Sartre’s lecture, “Existentialism is a Humanism,” is a great place to start. In this short and accessible text, Sartre outlines some of the basic principles of existentialism while defending it against accusations of “quietism and despair.”

    One prominent principle of existentialism is that existence precedes essence. Some philosophies and many religions ascribe an essence to a human being with a specific purpose in mind. This is similar to a manufacturer determining the purpose of a hammer before creating that hammer. For humans, however, Sartre believes that there is no essence that precedes the existence of humans. Humans are thrown into this world without an essence and create their essence through the great responsibility of choice.

    Another point of the essay is to clarify that existentialism posits that humans not only choose for themselves but choose for others through that choice. This clarification defends against the critiques of quietism laid against this philosophy.
    #philosophy #existentialism #sartre
    Music by HoobeZa
    Business Inquiries: amygdalavids@gmail.com
    Instagram: philosophytoonsyt
    ko-fi: ko-fi.com/phil...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 35

  • @Existentialist-earthling52
    @Existentialist-earthling52 8 місяців тому +5

    This lecture is so magnificent that it is both a good introduction and still worth studying on an advanced level.

    • @God-T
      @God-T Місяць тому

      If u wanna be a smart guy mix Existentialism with pragmatism it dose wonders for ur brain.🤓

  • @Stephen88553
    @Stephen88553 2 роки тому +11

    Hey dude it's my first video I watched on this channel, just wanted to say your content is really great and informative your channel will blow up in the algorithim one day.Keep up the great content :]

  • @gazrater1820
    @gazrater1820 2 роки тому +5

    A good book and worth the hour or two in my humble opinion even if Sartre isn’t your favourite existentialist. Great work Paul, thank you.

    • @PhilosophyToons
      @PhilosophyToons  2 роки тому

      Definitely a valuable book for those new to existentialism.

  • @doorbella1357
    @doorbella1357 Рік тому

    This was one of the best philosophy vids I've seen so far. Keep going!

  • @philosophemes
    @philosophemes 11 місяців тому

    Thanks for putting this together! Heidegger's Letter on Humanism is, of course, a response to Sartre. Heidegger thought Sartre's "existentialism" was not very good. My What Is Existentialism? book explains what I think is still salvageable from Sartre. Cheers!

  • @realjamiegardiner
    @realjamiegardiner 2 роки тому +3

    Loving the new graphics 👌

  • @sonicrevic4928
    @sonicrevic4928 2 роки тому +1

    I really enjoy your videos. Your channel should be way bigger.

  • @olv4703
    @olv4703 2 роки тому +1

    Great as always!

  • @PhilPhysics
    @PhilPhysics 2 роки тому +3

    There is a readers guide by Joseph Catalano for Being and Nothingness that really explains Sartre's calculus in a clear way.

    • @PhilPhysics
      @PhilPhysics 2 роки тому

      Also see Nietzsche, Genealogy, Second Essay, RE: 6:45.

    • @PhilosophyToons
      @PhilosophyToons  2 роки тому

      Thanks, I'll check it out if I ever decide to tackle that behemoth

    • @PhilPhysics
      @PhilPhysics 2 роки тому

      @@PhilosophyToons to be specific, sections 1-4ish talks of this "responsibility" you spoke of.

  • @jthewei
    @jthewei 2 роки тому

    relatable beginning

  • @gookimomor2460
    @gookimomor2460 2 роки тому

    at what point does the video start to explain existentialism ? I got tired of waiting at 2:07

  • @franciscocorrea5052
    @franciscocorrea5052 2 роки тому

    Will read it Paul, promise. :)

  • @lobomarin5459
    @lobomarin5459 2 роки тому +1

    I've bought existencial is a humanism so many times but I always end up giving it away

    • @PhilosophyToons
      @PhilosophyToons  2 роки тому

      Should be online for free I think

    • @lobomarin5459
      @lobomarin5459 2 роки тому

      @@PhilosophyToons oh it is bro, still want my hard copy tho lol

  • @maxlancaster6685
    @maxlancaster6685 2 роки тому

    love the videos, I'm curious though. Do you use subliminal messages in your videos

  • @PhilPhysics
    @PhilPhysics 2 роки тому +3

    Bahahahaha lolololol awesome that THAT text worked. XD

  • @Jacob-yb3hz
    @Jacob-yb3hz 2 роки тому +3

    "Less than 40 pages" *puts a symbol of greater than 40 pages* What

  • @eeronat
    @eeronat 6 місяців тому

    People who needs to be cajoled to have them read a book have a decision to make: Is this how you want to be? Is this how you'd have us be?

    • @Taheem-o4k
      @Taheem-o4k 5 місяців тому

      I wonder of Sartre smoked weed

  • @katherinebarnes4091
    @katherinebarnes4091 2 місяці тому

    But purpose, decisions, and responsibility are not God's doing by the doctrine of Christianity. It is your doing to discover your own purpose. And to take responsibility for your own actions. That is why you are given free will. There is no contradiction in philosophies there. Living rightly as an example to other humans to follow is also consistent with the Christian doctrine. I think where they differ is that Sartre believes that the universe comes into existence before its essence or purpose can be gleaned. And its existence just is and always was. Existence precedes essence. In the Christian doctrine, there is a creator that divines the universe and organizes it to allow for conscience imbued with observational data to derive its essence. And the Christian doctrine says that there is a spiritual realm beyond that which we can directly observe. An existentialist does not believe in any other realm beyond that which is directly observable.

  • @jayyyen
    @jayyyen 2 роки тому

    Tandoori Chicken

  • @lobomarin5459
    @lobomarin5459 2 роки тому +1

    First lol

  • @Kryt0n2X4B
    @Kryt0n2X4B Рік тому +1

    8min and first 2 have nothing to do with the book. extremely annoying

    • @ArthurIAHamm
      @ArthurIAHamm Рік тому

      Go watch his video of perspectivism