I once read that this was the profile Sigurd Savonius settled on as the most efficient towards the end of his life. The helix shape is a wonderful improvement. How does its efficientsy compare with your other design that has the two small "canard" vanes feeding into the hemispherical blades? They both must have good torque. I wish you great success.
Basically, the efficiency of Savonius is quite low at approx. 15 % in relation to the projected wind area. However, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages in cities, because this wind power is a restless rotor and therefore works almost noiselessly. So it's all a question of perspective.
Hello all, it depends on what you expect. The prediction of the energy yield is overly dependent on the frequency of good wind strengths. The form of the energy yield multiplies the formula v for the wind speed and a three in the exponent. That means if you double the wind, the output increases eightfold. This makes it clear that if you live on a coastside or in the mountains and have a free field in front of you from the main wind direction, I recommend that you call us immediately 🙂
The design was good but the place where it stands is not. Obviously, the place is not windy. The best place where to put it should be near the shoreline.
unfortunately not. in savonius' design, you have to guide the built-up wind around the central shaft in order to blow it onto the back of the counter-rotating sash. this only works with two sashes. with three, the shaft is obstructed.
Thats nonsensical. VAWTs obviously work and are being adopted more and more because of the low maintenance, low cost and low complexity compared to HAWTs. Hawts are a dying breed, a grotesque invention that kills more wildlife than any other power generator.. VAWTS can be installed anywhere, on side of building, on rooftops, on land, at sea. HAWTs are limited by their footprint and complexity.
![[UA] NAVI vs MOUZ | BO5 | IEM Rio 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CMBYk0cbGoA/mqdefault.jpg)
it is the future, congrulatations from PERU
Nice wind turbine ! :)
I have seen it spin and have not seen it generate electricity.
Beautiful wind turbine, who manufacture this turbine, what capacity turbine is this
I once read that this was the profile Sigurd Savonius settled on as the most efficient towards the end of his life. The helix shape is a wonderful improvement. How does its efficientsy compare with your other design that has the two small "canard" vanes feeding into the hemispherical blades? They both must have good torque. I wish you great success.
Basically, the efficiency of Savonius is quite low at approx. 15 % in relation to the projected wind area. However, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages in cities, because this wind power is a restless rotor and therefore works almost noiselessly. So it's all a question of perspective.
All Verticals fail all of the time for the same reason jet fighters don't use paddle wheels for engines.✈️
How much does the entire system cost including delivery?
This has to be the most unique green power for sure. I am wondering what is the price of this item ?? Nice work everyone involved.
Good morning,
What is the minimum speed to operate the vertical wind turbine ?
Regard
3 or 4 blades maybe good solution to get more wind power
Good morning,
after two yearsd
question
would you recommend me this vertical wind turbine to create current for use in the home?
Regard
Hello all,
it depends on what you expect. The prediction of the energy yield is overly dependent on the frequency of good wind strengths. The form of the energy yield multiplies the formula v for the wind speed and a three in the exponent. That means if you double the wind, the output increases eightfold. This makes it clear that if you live on a coastside or in the mountains and have a free field in front of you from the main wind direction, I recommend that you call us immediately 🙂
Hi we are going to buy this system. pl, guide and give more data about it. thanks
Amazing !
The helix shape is a new and trendy design, different from those regular parallel shape, is this turbine using the rated 1000w generator?
Dear Zoe, Thanks for your message. in thise turbin we use a Generator with 3 kW nominal power and a max. power of 5 kW.
hay uno botella enterrada y produce agua del ambiente
what is the mass of the turbine blades ? excluding the support shaft and all
250 kg
The design was good but the place where it stands is not. Obviously, the place is not windy. The best place where to put it should be near the shoreline.
para instalar en desierto de. Sonora y produzca. Agua
A study case, please.
100 Mrd in das Projekt gesteckt um dann beim Video keine 5 € für gute Musik auszugeben
Wow
You will get better output using 3 blades instead of 2 blades
ther is three
unfortunately not. in savonius' design, you have to guide the built-up wind around the central shaft in order to blow it onto the back of the counter-rotating sash. this only works with two sashes. with three, the shaft is obstructed.
3 kw at 16ms or 57kmh wind speed seems not enough for project cost and size IMHO.
seems pretty sorry
There are lies.I don't answer the phone. and email.
All Verticals fail all of the time for the same reason jet fighters don't use paddle wheels for engines.✈️
Thats nonsensical. VAWTs obviously work and are being adopted more and more because of the low maintenance, low cost and low complexity compared to HAWTs. Hawts are a dying breed, a grotesque invention that kills more wildlife than any other power generator.. VAWTS can be installed anywhere, on side of building, on rooftops, on land, at sea. HAWTs are limited by their footprint and complexity.
First turkey made.byby
Anyone from india has intrest in manufacturing vawt
More Fake Junk
unfortunately a dubious comment which shows that the net offers room for everyone. also for ignorant people towards innovative solutions.
@@luvside8531 сколько стоит ?