1951 Chrysler Imperial Crown 2017 Barrett Jackson auto appraisal Jason Phillips

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 вер 2024
  • In Scottsdale Arizona certified auto appraiser Jason Phillips magnet tested and evaluated this beautiful past senior winning Imperial Crown. Listed by Barret Jackson as an Imperial, I believe it had all the trim and options found on the Imperial Crown, like power windows and steering. The tell tale difference between the two, besides the crown emblems on the decklid and hubcaps was the two piece rear quarter trim, separated by a gap between the stone splash and the horizontal bar. Either way, this very nice example was 1 of about 650 Imperials made in 1951, and it hammered at an impressive $52,000. That's $22,000 OVER Hagerty's classic guide high value! Looks like it will be time to adjust the Imperial's value column waay UP!
    Do YOU need expert car inspection or auto appraisal service like this? Details below, www.autoapprais... 800-301-3886
    Auto Appraise Inc. has 310 nationwide inspectors that go out and photo, magnet test, underbody inspect, test drive and report objectively on classic cars all over the country. We'll give you over 100 still photos, sometimes 200+ including underbody shots, a well written report that documents all important aspects about the car, all reviewed by the companie's owner Jason Phillips that shot this video. A Michigan based corp., Jason travels the country inspecting and documenting and authenticating classic cars. Only he primarily records these videos that summarize the results of his 3 or 4 hour long inspections. Certified as a mechanic in 1981, he worked over 9 years as a classic car adjuster for Hagerty Collector Car Insurance and J.C. Taylor Insurance. He's restored many cars and been qualified as an automotive expert multiple times, including jury trials. He's personally available on short notice to bid any job or collection, when sending one of his regional inspectors just won't do.
    SELLING A NICE CLASSIC CAR?
    Let Auto Appraise Assist. We can inspect, report, and give you the proper tools to get the job done, or consign the whole project from you and deal with the selling process from start to finish. We are hired daily by purchasers seeking to spend their money on their dream car. Contact us to discuss. Thank you, and be sure to click "SUBSCRIBE" !! 810-694-2008 OR email cars@autoappraise.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 75

  • @nukemanmd
    @nukemanmd 6 років тому +30

    Apparently, this unit sold for $53,900 at the Scottsdale B-J auction in Jan 2017. This is what a car looked like the year I was born. If only my body could be rehab'd the way this car was.

  • @alanstrong3295
    @alanstrong3295 3 роки тому +6

    Luxury at its finest. Must be one smooth ride.

  • @josephconsoli4128
    @josephconsoli4128 2 роки тому +4

    The car just exudes dignified elegance. The color combo is very complimentary for the car. You were doing well driving this in the day!

  • @ckryses3962
    @ckryses3962 3 роки тому +4

    I used to think that 55 Chrysler Imperial is super gorgeous but nope 51 took the lead!! The more early years of Chrysler we will head toward the more gorgeous we will ring!! I loved the dash!! Dash is so........... ornamental!

    • @WitchKing-Of-Angmar
      @WitchKing-Of-Angmar 2 роки тому +2

      Most early 1950's automobiles are always better than the middle and later, people don't realize because they never look past 1955, or the name Chevrolet 1955. In other words most people on earth think there was basically 3 companies that made automobiles and they only look at a 1955-56-57 chevrolet, or a Cadillac 1959, and a Hudson Hornet 1952. And never look past that to actually care and learn history about the 1950's. I hardly bet anyone realizes that these are period stock tires either.

    • @ckryses3962
      @ckryses3962 2 роки тому

      @@WitchKing-Of-Angmar lolol then we are lucky to have those types of people around, less attention mean less costly, readily available maybe nearby in backyard barn who knows and you went there..bought it cheap and voilla...i say people should always think chevy, caddys are best and dont look anywhere else..

    • @TheDejael
      @TheDejael 8 місяців тому

      @@WitchKing-Of-Angmar Personally, I prefer the Exner Forward Look cars of Chrysler Corp. 1955-1962 from a purely design standpoint, but the early 1950s Chrysler cars, which were short on beauty of design but high in quality and engineering, are very interesting also. However, there are few cars as ugly as a 1951-52 Plymouth.

    • @WitchKing-Of-Angmar
      @WitchKing-Of-Angmar 8 місяців тому

      @@TheDejael Personally, I prefer vehicles from 1915-1936, so because i appreciate earlier vehicles, I don't see early 1950s automobiles as old at all. Win win.

    • @TheDejael
      @TheDejael 8 місяців тому

      @@WitchKing-Of-Angmar The late 1940s-early 1950s Chrysler Corp. cars of 1946-1954 are so old fashioned.

  • @califdad4
    @califdad4 3 роки тому +3

    This was from the days when a imperial was a deluxe Chrysler, it didn't become just a imperial till 1955

  • @johndunbar7504
    @johndunbar7504 7 років тому +20

    I own a 1953 Imperial which is my `daily' driver (twice a week) and fully appreciate what differentiates quality automobiles like this from the hideous, modern junk made by robots from re-cycled pop cans. It ALWAYS starts on the second turn , no matter how cold, and NEVER BREAKS DOWN ! there are not even any body rattles which is hardly surprising as these were the last of the Briggs bodies made for Chrysler. GLORY BE TO THE GREAT DAYS OF AMERICAN AUTOMOBILES.

    • @simonjenkins4481
      @simonjenkins4481 6 років тому +1

      I'm looking 1951-1954...hardtop

    • @Thekoryosmenstribepodcast
      @Thekoryosmenstribepodcast 5 років тому +2

      Yeah now its Prius and junk. I wish I could go back in time.

    • @34Packardphaeton
      @34Packardphaeton 5 років тому

      John,.. Does your '53 Imperial have a twelve-volt electrical system?

    • @justenough730
      @justenough730 5 років тому +2

      @@34Packardphaeton 6 volt.

    • @andydanko7074
      @andydanko7074 3 роки тому

      I wish my daily job was "twice a week"😁😁

  • @stevenquinn4641
    @stevenquinn4641 6 років тому +7

    Power windows in the front, and hand cranked in the rear, I also saw this on an old Packed convertible when I was a kid Very interesting beautiful car

    • @autobug2
      @autobug2 4 роки тому

      `52 was the Imperial's last convertible until `57. By `53 Chrysler's power windows operated all 4; not just the fronts.

    • @shartingfish5761
      @shartingfish5761 4 роки тому +2

      Early fox body mustangs did the same thing

  • @alanstrong3295
    @alanstrong3295 4 роки тому +3

    Must be one roomy and comfy ride. Imperial Crown was a legendary car.

  • @PeBoVision
    @PeBoVision 3 роки тому +3

    Such a beautiful car! Thanks for sharing your appraisal.
    Great camera work too. Too many UA-cam vintage car videos feature camera movements that make it difficult to look at the car...zooming in/out repeatedly and moving to/fro at breakneck speeds. This video was far more enjoyable for not falling into these traps. Well done.

  • @michaelbenardo5695
    @michaelbenardo5695 2 роки тому +2

    The Imperial Crown came out in 57, the Crown Imperial was a limousine-sized car. The "crown" emblems simply meant royally prestigeous.

    • @TheDejael
      @TheDejael 8 місяців тому

      The Imperial Crown made its debut as a 1950 model, but they were so exclusive, they sold in such limited numbers and now are super rare so that they are nearly extinct as a species from 1950 to 1954. There were none built 1955-56, so when the 1957 models came out, they seemed like a new model making their debut, which was a good selling point for Chrysler's all-new Imperial line as a separate make.

  • @TheDejael
    @TheDejael 8 місяців тому +1

    This entire car was designed by Bill Robinson of Briggs Auto Body Company of Chicago, for Chrysler Corp. Very rare car! Before Exner became involved in the production cars. Exner was a part time design consultant for Chrysler at that time, reporting to Chrysler CEO K.T, Keller, so he was only minimally involved, and was still working at Studebaker via the Raymond Loewy Studio.

    • @AutoAppraise
      @AutoAppraise  7 місяців тому

      Thank you for the informative input!

  • @tompastian3447
    @tompastian3447 Рік тому +1

    Love the bumpers on this car. Not over done, but very elegant and stylish, what great looking bumpers should look like on a luxury car like this. Really a lot of great detail all around. Only draw back to this car that I see is the placement of the spare. It appears to block out quite a lot of trunk space on the right fender. Perhaps mounting the tire over the rear trunk shelf would have given the trunk more room.

  • @alanstrong3295
    @alanstrong3295 3 роки тому +3

    The yellow lights at the rear must be the backup lights.

  • @jamesfox2579
    @jamesfox2579 3 роки тому +4

    Beautiful Beauuuutiful Car!❤️

  • @tomfrazier1103
    @tomfrazier1103 Рік тому

    I had a '68 Newport wagon, with front disc brakes. There was a '53 Imperial sedan on the next block, as a kid in 1980s California. I had my first car I never got running, a '50 DeSoto sedan.

  • @alanstrong55
    @alanstrong55 Рік тому

    The backup lights on this car are seemingly yellow. That is actually good. Impy gave Caddy and Lincy a run for its money. YES!

  • @kurtbrueske
    @kurtbrueske 2 місяці тому

    Gorgeous...manufactured to a higher standard than vehicles today.

  • @seed_drill7135
    @seed_drill7135 6 років тому +6

    They aren't reproducing those bullseye headlights. Getting quite hard to find.

  • @adoreslaurel
    @adoreslaurel 4 роки тому +3

    Beautiful car but where could you park it day to day without it getting knifed and maybe stolen?

    • @brustar5152
      @brustar5152 4 роки тому +3

      My front yard would do nicely.

    • @adoreslaurel
      @adoreslaurel 4 роки тому +4

      @@brustar5152 What a damn shame that the Chrysler name has been soiled by the association with Fiat, Chrysler made great cars, even my old 225 Torqueflyte was a great old car.Transmission was indestructible,

  • @jamesh7571
    @jamesh7571 4 роки тому +3

    Very Nice Indeed!!

  • @seed_drill7135
    @seed_drill7135 6 років тому +6

    Wouldn't that car have had the Presto-matic transmission, rather than the regular fluid drive? I know Dodge was offering both the standard fluid drive and the more advanced Gyro-matic in that year, but don't know about Chrysler.

    • @lawrencerubinson2707
      @lawrencerubinson2707 5 років тому +1

      The Prestomatic trans was standard on the Imperial.the transmission quadrant on the steering column shows that this is Prestomatic

  • @genegarbis8746
    @genegarbis8746 2 роки тому +1

    I owned a 53 Nuport Custom Imperial ,, for years,, only 823 made
    Sorry I lost it ,,,,a stunning beautiful car , quite fast , John Osborne , Rolls Roys and. Cadillac dealer in
    Long Beach CA , once compared it to a Rolls Corniece ,,,, The Imp had alot more class. 18 mpg freeway ,,
    Horrible Brakes dangerous ,,

  • @tomsirois5668
    @tomsirois5668 Рік тому +1

    Worth every penny

  • @hanschenk2708
    @hanschenk2708 7 років тому +11

    BEAUTIFUL CAR EXCELLENT VIDEO TO

  • @jimburig7064
    @jimburig7064 5 років тому +3

    The door gaps are pretty big at the rear on both sides.

  • @billolsen4360
    @billolsen4360 4 роки тому +2

    Are the amber lamps on the rear end back-up lights?

  • @greglogan7050
    @greglogan7050 6 років тому +5

    Could be wrong but I think that on these years the crown would be the 8 passenger limo.

    • @billolsen4360
      @billolsen4360 4 роки тому +3

      Had a buddy in high school whose dad was a Chrysler dealer...an Imperial Crown was a sedan or a Coupe. A Crown Imperial was the stretch limousine that Chrysler had built on special order by Ghia in Italy. Mamie Eisenhower's last White House car was a 1960 Crown Imperial and it was later used to transport Jacqueline Kennedy.

  • @ufoengines
    @ufoengines 5 років тому +4

    So Cool!

  • @goldenboy5500
    @goldenboy5500 7 років тому +6

    I wonder why they put power windows in the front and not in the back

    • @goldenboy5500
      @goldenboy5500 7 років тому

      why do you think that's a stupid question,

    • @Thekoryosmenstribepodcast
      @Thekoryosmenstribepodcast 5 років тому +2

      Probably cause the motors for the windows was too big to fit behind the paneling.

  • @bobmarker6812
    @bobmarker6812 5 років тому +3

    I believe this was the first year for electric windows versus hydraulic ones.

  • @alanblanes2876
    @alanblanes2876 6 років тому +5

    Is this one of the disc brake Imperials of that era?

  • @KCCardCo
    @KCCardCo Місяць тому

    When it was young it definitely parked in a lot VIP parking lots.

  • @steventhorson4487
    @steventhorson4487 Рік тому

    Absolutely ❤️ 💯 👌 awesome!!

  • @ronaldgoff7499
    @ronaldgoff7499 5 років тому +2

    wish i had it be great my father had 51 windsor it was great car 51 to 59 when fluid drive went out sad got 58 plymouth peace of rusting shit no park em brake failed sad day for chryler co

    • @TheDejael
      @TheDejael 8 місяців тому

      Chrysler's Fluid Drive was a hybrid manual-to-automatic transmission available on their cars from 1941 to 1953, when they introduced Hy-Drive for 1953-54, their first automatic transmission, which was replaced mid-year 1954 by the much improved Powerflite.

  • @drycool4783
    @drycool4783 5 років тому +2

    very cool! 😁👍

  • @gcgar1951
    @gcgar1951 6 років тому +2

    Then, I guess my statement is CORRECT from 1955 on. :-)

  • @nathanlester9985
    @nathanlester9985 4 роки тому +1

    Don't quote me, but I believe an interesting fact with this car is it's the first commercially available passenger car with power steering

    • @billolsen4360
      @billolsen4360 4 роки тому

      That's Chrysler engineering for you back in the 50's...always a bit ahead of the competition

    • @WitchKing-Of-Angmar
      @WitchKing-Of-Angmar 3 роки тому

      DeSoto 1931

  • @RedC73
    @RedC73 7 років тому +14

    The narrator has no idea what a "Crown" Imperial is as well as what was standard and optional on a 1951 Imperial. Much of what he says is not accurate. I give him credit for trying, but he is not informed about 1951 Imperials.

    •  5 років тому

      The gas cap looks odd on this car.

    • @richardfeibel3154
      @richardfeibel3154 5 років тому +3

      ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, THE 1951''' CROWN''' IMPERIALS WERE ALL 8 PASSENGER LIMOS .THE'' IMPERIAL'' ONLY BADGE WAS WORN BY SEDAN 4DR; COUPE 2DR; HARDTOP 2DR; AND CONV. IN 1952 THEY ADDED A 4DR IMPERIAL TO THE CROWN LINEUP .BUT HE WAS CORRECT THAT THEY MADE 650 CONV.IN 1951

    • @larryhawkins3294
      @larryhawkins3294 5 років тому +2

      I sure as he'll wouldn't know either. I was born in 1952. I can tell you what was standard starting with 62 Imperial Crowns. The Crowns were well appointed base models that competed with Cadillac DeVilles. In 67 an Imperial post sedan was introduced below the Crown. It was a nice car that competed with the Cadillac Calais. They had base prices without options of about $5100.

  • @gcgar1951
    @gcgar1951 6 років тому +6

    IMPERIAL by Chrysler, NOT a Chrysler Imperial.

    • @TheItsmegp46
      @TheItsmegp46 6 років тому +4

      Gary G. Reese wrong. Chrysler spun off Imperial as its own division starting with the 1955 model year. Before that Imperial was just a step up from New Yorker. But unlike say Cadillac, Imperial was never sold in its own dealership. They were sold right next to Chrysler’s price leader Windsor. So the buying public never made the disconnect and still referred to the car as a Chrysler Imperial.

    • @TheItsmegp46
      @TheItsmegp46 5 років тому

      Neil Anderson For 1951? I don’t think so.

    • @34Packardphaeton
      @34Packardphaeton 5 років тому +2

      ... not until the '55 model year.

    • @RADIUMGLASS
      @RADIUMGLASS 4 роки тому +1

      This one is a Chrysler Imperial

    • @billolsen4360
      @billolsen4360 4 роки тому +2

      @@TheItsmegp46 Exactly right Very few people remember the Imperial becoming it's own division.

  • @user-kg1vj2nr8f
    @user-kg1vj2nr8f Рік тому

    You left a big greasy finger print on that chrome.

  • @anastassiosperakis2869
    @anastassiosperakis2869 2 місяці тому

    fugly, crude design.