This is Cubic Spline with Natural Cubic Splines. This spline type includes the stipulation that the second derivative be equal to zero at the endpoints. That is Mo = Mn = 0.
Check your Answer for i=2 u have a wrong value for M sub i+1... otherwise thanks so much. Very very very good job. But the formula it's too wide...though better to be used
How do i find h if the difference between numbers isn't the same?
very good explanation. Thank you
In the second iteration
you wrote the M2 in second part and it should me M3
Btw Nice Solving
Very good explanation! Excellent. Can you also explain Neville's Method?
thanks u so much you have a good way to explaining
Glad it helped!
Is the formula shown in 4:01 correct?....some other channels are doing with some other formula. Are there any other formula?
Mam in that i= 2 section after 1/6(x3-x)³M2+ 1/6(x-x2)³M3.... ,mam u have taken M2, so the equation is wrong mam
Well explained👏👏
How to get the value of h if you don't have equal difference between your the points. Thanks
Good explanation 👏
Thank you… :)
Easy to understand 😇
Excellent explaining ❤ Bravo!!!
Thank you…
Very good
What about the convergence of the estimator cubique spline, do you have any idea or reference!
Natural cubic spline also mean the same ?
thanks 💗💗
But thank you mam for clearing my concept
Thank you madam 😊
Glad it was helpful…
👌👌👌👍👍👍
Hope you will do it in ms excel maam❤❤❤
Thank u may be give Example show using in partial differntial Equation
How find M (4)=0
you have a nice voice and explaination could be have been better
what if x date is not increase by 1 !
you take example h=1
what if the different between x- date is not same iteration !
Thanks
You are welcome!!
thank you
Glad it was helpful…
You sound like an alien LOL
why Mo= 0 and M4=0
This is Cubic Spline with Natural Cubic Splines. This spline type includes the stipulation that the second derivative be equal to zero at the endpoints. That is Mo = Mn = 0.
Check your Answer for i=2 u have a wrong value for M sub i+1... otherwise thanks so much. Very very very good job. But the formula it's too wide...though better to be used
Kiu slow batarahey tum hamare time loss hogaya hey 😏