Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Carleton College Convocation with Professor Francis Fukuyama | January 26, 2024

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 січ 2024
  • The Global Challenge of 2024. The world has seen major setbacks to liberal democracy and the outbreak of two large wars. What are possible global outcomes that will emerge in the year 2024?
    Francis Fukuyama is the Olivier Nomellini Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies (FSI), and a faculty member of FSI’s Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CDDRL). He is also Director of Stanford’s Ford Dorsey Master’s in International Policy, and a professor (by courtesy) of Political Science.
    Dr. Fukuyama has written widely on issues in development and international politics. His 1992 book, The End of History and the Last Man, has appeared in over twenty foreign editions. His most recent book, Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment, was published in Sept. 2018. His latest book, Liberalism and Its Discontents, was published in May 2022.
    Francis Fukuyama received his B.A. from Cornell University in classics, and his Ph.D. from Harvard in Political Science. He was a member of the Political Science Department of the RAND Corporation, and of the Policy Planning Staff of the US Department of State. From 1996-2000 he was Omer L. and Nancy Hirst Professor of Public Policy at the School of Public Policy at George Mason University, and from 2001-2010 he was Bernard L. Schwartz Professor of International Political Economy at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University. He served as a member of the President’s Council on Bioethics from 2001-2004.
    Dr. Fukuyama holds honorary doctorates from Connecticut College, Doane College, Doshisha University (Japan), Kansai University (Japan), Aarhus University (Denmark), and the Pardee Rand Graduate School. He is a non-resident fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and at the Center for Global Development. He is also a member of the Board of Trustees of the Rand Corporation, the Board of Governors of the Pardee Rand Graduate School and the Volcker Alliance, and a member of the American Political Science Association and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dr. Fukuyama is married to Laura Holmgren and has three children.
    Carleton.edu: www.carleton.edu/
    UA-cam: / carletoncollege
    Instagram: / carletoncollege
    Facebook: / carletoncollege
    Twitter/X: / carletoncollege
    Threads: www.threads.ne...
    TikTok: / carletoncollege
    LinkedIn: / carleton-college
    Carleton College is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,000 students in Northfield, Minnesota. The nation’s top college for undergraduate teaching, Carleton is known for its academic rigor, intellectual curiosity, and sense of humor.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @MattRoed
    @MattRoed 6 місяців тому +1

    What is up with the weird echo with the audio? Super distracting from the amazing content. Carleton is awesome and I am very grateful that I am granted access to these discussions as they have greatly expanded my understanding. Students asking challenging questions is in my opinion the best aspect of these meetings as Carleton College is known for excellence.

  • @Vickielindstrander
    @Vickielindstrander 5 місяців тому +3

    Very few of his predictions have come true.

    • @user-uj6pc7bc5t
      @user-uj6pc7bc5t 4 місяці тому +1

      This is exactly the reason why Francis Fukuyama is the leading economist among those still living. Few wrong all the time, and most "professors" don't even capable of giving any comprehensible predictions at all.

    • @ruiy-br6ry
      @ruiy-br6ry 4 місяці тому

      Do you really understand him, he opposed Fukuyama

  • @Kafkaesque786
    @Kafkaesque786 3 місяці тому

    My distrust for hidden agendas and ideologies like neoconservatism nudges me into tilting towards more realistic interpretations of the world around me. Refer to Mearsheimer and Geoffery Sachs for more realistic and humane views respectively please.

    • @paulmaartin
      @paulmaartin Місяць тому +1

      There's nothing humanistic about mearsheimer.

    • @Kafkaesque786
      @Kafkaesque786 Місяць тому

      @@paulmaartin Mearsheimer=realistic.

    • @shanshui1991
      @shanshui1991 10 днів тому

      Sachs' views aren't humane - just anti-Western. Mearsheimer on the other hand is a so-calles "realist" but much of what he predicted wasn't very realisitic. Fukuyama on the other hand, is NOT a neo-conservative, esp. today.