The not mentioned interesting thing is that it was discovered by the Gaia satellite which is an amazing piece of technology. Everybody speaks about the JWST but Gaia is also incredible powerful!
Is this the same Gaia Project Tscope that mapped the star field as observed from Earth, perhaps more importantly establishing pulsar locations and timing in pursuit of gravitational wave measurements.
I always wish they talked about the volume of black holes whenever they bring up hpw massive they are. Obvioisly we know they are massive, I am more interested in their density 🤣
These are Soul escape holes.... for those who die and do not want to return to this Hell Hole Crack Rock! I'm going straight into one.... no second thoughts!
@@melissa3079ayalaif you don't care, then just don't comment, this comment is for people who don't know and would like to know, if you don't care, then just leave it
@@melissa3079ayala Of course everyone is going to be smarter than you when you have an attitude like yours to learning new things. You'll grow up one day though. 👌
@@michaelpettersson4919 Or they could just point at a star "in" Taurus and draw a line to where the location is. That's like saying the North Star is around the Big Dipper.
Worse, it’s not even the correct constellation. That black hole is in Ophiuchus. Probably just giving out wrong information to get more comments to boost the algorithm
@@acart5388 That's like saying police officers in the usa work for the president. I mean... ya.. technically? In a round about way, I guess? But how many police officers are going to meet the president and get sucked... into their field of influence?
@@wanderlustislamabad8082 - Well, we all are subject to something mightier. But, Sagittarius A is 25,000 lightyears away. The entire Milky Way Galaxy orbits it. Has been for more than 13 billion years. Unless your star system is up close (and personal) with it, there's not any peril from it or, influence, much at all.
These facts makes me wonder everytime. How tiny we are on earth! We can't even imagine what is really out there beyond the human discovered universe. What a suspenseful reality. So amazing 😇
@@aeroprakash87 more amazing the fact that a lot of things that NASA is descovering are mentioned in the Holy Quran before one thousand and five hundreds years ago including black holes and their functions, the expansion of the universe , the spiral movement of the sun and other blankets , the knocking stars which confirm that This book is sent from the creature of the earth and the space . Thanks God for being muslim
My understanding is that a black hole is just a star who in its lifetime became so dense causing its gravitational pull to be so strong as to prevent light from escaping it and so you can’t see it and they call it black. It appears to be a hole but actually at the bottom there is an extremely dense mass that is distorting the space around it. some people speculate that it is truly a hole as an entry into another universe but that’s pure speculation and we’ll probably never know
Watch Kurzgesagt’s three videos on them. In particular, “Black Holes 2” goes into the most absurd implications of their existence, i.e. the information paradox and the holographic principle. And if you haven’t, look up what it took for the EHT to actually get a _photograph_ of one of these monstrosities - 100 years, at last, after Einstein first proposed their hypothetical existence using mathematics alone.
As I commented before, I recommend a couple from NOVA, a PBS channel that is on UA-cam and one of them actually shows that they do exist by a sound that took millions of years to reach the Earth and scientists made a device that recorded it. Comment if you know the one I’m talking about.
You would not be able to observe it with a regular telescope. If we could, we would've found it sooner. The truth is, even if black holes were visible in any way (they're not, that's why they're called black holes) and at stellar mass, this thing would actually be tiny. While it is more massive than any object we could immediately compare it to, it would actually not even be as large as the earth. You definitely can't see a planet sized object from that far.
I think you missed the mark on all of that, schniitz. You can certainly "see" the effects of the black hole on the star that orbits it and you can see the swirling mass of material the hole is heating up, through friction, as it ingests what it pulls off of its companion. TMYK, pal...
@@vikramsinghchauhan9083 - Well, first.....You're gonna need an expensive telescope..... Then, locate the star that's circling nothing in the middle. But, even if you find it, it's not much to look at..... Because there's no accretion disc.
Pretty cool ey, now you don't need to get a telescope. The real thing probably doesn't look as impressive anyway... Might as well draw a black circle on a picture of a galaxy in Photoshop and you get more or less the same thing. Warp the edges a bit, tada
It's kinda scary to think there are just completely dark rogue black holes with no accretion disks just roaming in space. We would have literally no idea even if one came right towards us. Same thing as sudden gamma ray bursts, we would have no idea until one hit us because it's moving at the speed of light.
@@Litepaw we would just get pulled into its orbit we been flying around in space this long without clashing with black holes why would it happen in your life time 🤷🏽♂️
Black holes don't "travel" around the universe tho. It would be the other way around where an object (spaceship, asteroid, etc that moves) would get too close to the black hole. The black hole is just sitting there
When I say "object" that moves, it also includes photons (light) because it's moving and that photon wouldn't be able to escape the black hole (hence the name black hole where even light can't escape)
@OhAncientOne I get what you mean but imagine being an astronaut and your tether broke and that's you left floating towards some mad planet like Jupiter or something or getting turned into human spaghetti by a backhole lol if it was totally safe id be fine with it but I gotta agree with the first persons comment especially after that experimental submarine imploded
Well by the same logic, everyone sees atoms, quarks and even electrons all the time - even when the eyes are closed, cus eyelids are made of matter too
That was not sun . Sun is the name of the star that is in our solar system, .we named the star in our solar system sun. Every star in space is not sun.
It's not located in Taurus constellation but Opiuchus constellation. And you can't see it from your telescope easily. It's called black hole for a reason as not even light escapes from it. Given its size, it's accretion disk would be smaller than a supermassive black hole.
BUT, since the star orbits around the black hole, perhaps you can time it so that you can see the dimming of said star signifying the presence of a black hole
Need to be more specific. You cannot see the black hole. You can see only the star of the binary system. Gaia BH 1 is the name of the binary system, not the black hole.
Yeah I think there some missing information here. We can only see the effects that blackholes have on the things around it. Not the actual blackhole, hence the term "blackhole". But they are saying that it can be observed with a simple telescope? But there's no accretion disc or mass transfer..so no super heated material around it..and the star itself would only be a tiny pinpoint light. This isn't making sense how we can "see it for ourselves".
It is seeing the star that orbits the blackhole that's *inferred* when the narrator says that you can spot the blackhole with a simple telescope..... because you're effectively looking right at the blackhole since its a binary system (close enough together that the tiny point of light is virtually the same location as the blackhole given both the distance between the two objects, and the distance between us and the system).
@@shamlotbestrhapsever7437 The narrator doesn't say you can 'spot' the black hole he says you can see the black hole. Also as I've said before is not the name of the black hole it's the name of the binary system. If we want to talk science, we can't talk slop like that. He's demonstrating he doesn't have a clear concept of what is going on, and he's projecting that inaccuracy upon anyone who may buy into what he's saying.
@@MIN0RITY-REP0RT IT WAS *INFERRED* - anyone with the slightest knowledge of blackholes knows you can't see one directly. He even acknowledges a lack of accretion disc or mass transfer effectively making the blackhole *unseeable.* Perhaps his choice of words weren't ideal (and definitely click-baity) but I'd argue this narrator's "slop" is less egregious than someone's inability to comprehend basic inference. In other words, if you read the narrator's comments 100% literally (i.e. "see the blackhole"), you probably shouldn't be watching Blackhole clips to in the first place -- and better to start with actual Channels that provide a more substantive introduction versus a video that's 1minute long.
@@shamlotbestrhapsever7437 Your's is the lamest vanity reply I've ever read. He, and you, are products of the dumbed-down educational system in America - and the best you can do is double-down on defending that which cannot be rationally defended. I don't need to stop watching UA-cam shorts, I need to stop communicating with Internet deadweight such as yourself. You are blocked. :-)
I remember when I was in high-school science and black holes, were still only thought to exist. Our textbooks had maybe 1 or 2 sentences on the subject, saying black holes, may or my not exist.
How does the Kozai-Lidov mechanism influence the orbital dynamics of a trans-Neptunian object within a three-body system involving a distant stellar companion? To provide an answer I’ll have to break this up into 12 points. 1. Introduction to the Kozai-Lidov Mechanism: • The Kozai-Lidov mechanism describes oscillations in the orbit of a celestial body due to gravitational perturbations from a distant, inclined companion. It was first identified by Yoshihide Kozai and Michel Lidov independently in the 1960s. 2. Three-Body System: • The system consists of a primary body (the Sun), a secondary body (a trans-Neptunian object, TNO), and a tertiary body (a distant stellar companion). The tertiary body exerts a periodic gravitational influence on the TNO. 3. Initial Conditions: • The TNO orbits the Sun, and the distant stellar companion has an orbit inclined relative to the TNO’s orbital plane. This inclination is crucial for the Kozai-Lidov mechanism to take effect. 4. Perturbations and Oscillations: • The distant stellar companion’s gravitational influence causes periodic perturbations in the TNO’s orbit. These perturbations lead to coupled oscillations in the TNO’s orbital eccentricity (how elongated the orbit is) and inclination (the tilt of the orbit relative to the plane of the solar system). 5. Eccentricity and Inclination Exchange: • Over time, the TNO’s eccentricity and inclination undergo periodic exchanges. When the TNO’s eccentricity increases (making the orbit more elongated), its inclination decreases, and vice versa. This exchange happens in a predictable cycle known as Kozai cycles. 6. Effect on Orbital Parameters: • The Kozai-Lidov mechanism can drive the TNO into highly eccentric orbits, bringing it closer to the Sun at perihelion (closest approach) and farther at aphelion (farthest point). These changes can lead to significant variations in the TNO’s orbital parameters over time. 7. Secular Timescales: • The timescales for these oscillations are secular, meaning they occur over long periods (thousands to millions of years), as opposed to short-term perturbations from planets within the solar system. 8. Role of Tertiary Body’s Mass and Distance: • The effectiveness of the Kozai-Lidov mechanism depends on the mass and distance of the distant stellar companion. A more massive or closer companion will exert stronger perturbations, leading to more pronounced oscillations in the TNO’s orbit. 9. Impact on TNO Population: • The Kozai-Lidov mechanism can influence the distribution and evolution of the TNO population. Some TNOs may be driven into highly eccentric orbits, potentially becoming short-period comets or being ejected from the solar system. 10. Observational Evidence: • Observations of TNOs with unusual orbital parameters can provide evidence for the Kozai-Lidov mechanism at work. The detection of distant stellar companions (e.g., wide binary stars) can further support the theory. 11. Theoretical Models and Simulations: • Astronomers use theoretical models and computer simulations to study the Kozai-Lidov mechanism’s impact on TNOs. These models help predict how TNO orbits evolve over time and the likelihood of specific orbital configurations. 12. Broader Implications: • Understanding the Kozai-Lidov mechanism has broader implications for studying the dynamics of other multi-body systems, such as exoplanetary systems, multiple star systems, and the formation and evolution of planetary systems. In summary, the Kozai-Lidov mechanism is a critical process in celestial mechanics that explains how distant gravitational perturbations can lead to significant, long-term changes in the orbits of trans-Neptunian objects and other celestial bodies within three-body systems.
It has a magnitude (brightness level) of 13.5 so it’s almost impossible to see with a telescope and it’s a black hole so that makes it even tougher to find since no light can be emitted. Note that the nearest galaxy Andromeda, has a magnitude of 3.44 and is hard to find in suburbs too
@@Shaquille0atmeal2028 If you stay in Kruger Park, they have the best night safaris. One of them was an astronomy night. You can see so many stars in Kruger, it's just not funny. If you get the chance, go. You'll love it.
Magnitude 13.5 can be resolved - just barely - by most medium size amateur telescopes on a night with very good seeing. That said, you won't have much to look at if you do.
In case you're wondering: an astronomical unit is the average distance from the centre of the earth to the centre of the sun. Roughly 150 million kilometres.
@@12carbon If someone is interested in space, they have to learn about these matters at some point in time, do they not? I mean, at the moment they show an interest, that piece of knowledge does not spontaneously become known to them. Be honest, you're simply trying to have a flex by stating "I'm smart because I already know what an AU is."
If you stay under a black hole Let's say with a spaceship with advanced technology or something. Then time would feel normal, but if you would go back to earth time has changed and your children could be dead a long time ago because they aged years when you were sitting under that black hole for a few hours. But for time itself I think a black hole absorbs it and fricking no one knows what's on the other side or if there even is an end. Some astronomers speculate that for every black hole, there could be a white hole where everything comes back out but it's just a speculation and nothing has been proved. Yet. My English is not the best sorry about that. But I hope I made black holes even more interesting now if you didn't know those things.
Gaia BH1 is located just 1,560 light-years away from Earth in the direction of the constellation Ophiuchus, while Gaia BH2 lies 3,800 light-years away in the constellation Centaurus.
The answer to life is in the center of a blackhole. The dimensions that exist in the past and the future is thought. It is the answer to the question that has not been asked yet. It is the fabric of the universe that makes matter and energy move together. Using math to solve what blackholes are in physics would work but you first need to have all the information which we can not observe completely with our limited senses.
If it's only a stellar mass black hole, within range of a few times the mass of our star, it's most likely a ballet, a binary system in which they orbit each other and the dilation would be similar to that of the star alone that orbits the black hole. Only when the gravitational forces reach critical levels approaching the horizon would you see any kind of measurable differences in space time.
Time is an abstract concept not a physical phenomenon. To go faster or slower in response to real phenomena like gravity it would have to exist in reality but it doesn't. Space is the same.
One of my absolute fascinations in life that if I could dedicate my time and not work would be Black Holes, Tornadoes, Hurricanes and Dreams. I just love learning about them and for Black Holes and Dreams developing my own theories.
Data from the European Space Agency's (ESA) Gaia mission revealed the closest known - and second closest - black holes in 2022, Gaia BH1 and Gaia BH2, which are 1,560 light-years and 3,800 light-years from Earth respectively.
Scientists believe there's a dark object they cannot perceive near the sun. Some say maybe a big, dark planet, but what if it's a black hole instead o.o Not that I know enough to know if that's even possible, just a thought xO
@@eonwe3559 Possibly. They have found a planet (Kepler-1b) that reflects only 1% of the light that hits it. That's pretty dark. And there are naturally occurring elements that do get darker, not to mention the possibility of undiscovered elements and materials
It wouldn't be even remotely scary. Mass is mass and gravity is gravity. A black hole doesn't suddenly swallow stuff up, and one close enough to matter would be wildly detectable. Literally asteroids are scarier, we could be wiped out at ANY MOMENT from a rock coming at us from any number of directions, but mainly one originating from an angle where the sun's glare blocks any ability to see it. We've had them fly-by us dangerously close and not seen them until they passed us because only then were they visible to our instruments. Theres literally nothing to fear from black holes, if one is detected in our backyard coming straight for us it will still be centuries before it matters, and you'll be gone. The only way it could kindof sneak up is from a preposterously elliptical orbit that just grazes the supermassive at the center of our galaxy, picks up damn-near intergalactic slingshot speed and comes at us from a patch of sky where there are literally 0 stars. Its not happening.
Most of the universe is rapidly expanding away from us. Except for everything in the milky way and Andromeda galaxy. Everything in those two galaxies gets closer to collision. That black hole is in our galaxy
What if black holes are a visual manifestation of where time had been throughout space and these blackholes are the folds between these dimensions of space and time. Not a different univesrse but the same one at a different point of existence all packed and unpacked between these gateways like little living snapshots/or snowglobes.
The interesting thing about blackholes is that they dont suck everything up, its just that, once you get too close you cant get out, as blanets exist, (planets orbiting a blackhole) however, blanetary life, would be interesting
@@valentinaapostol507 pretty sure there is no afterlife Once our body d!es which causes our brain to stop functioning, our consciousness is de@d. Just like how we sleep and skip 7-8 hours, once we d!e, we would skip everything, similar to how we skipped everything before we were born :(
@@fly463 you cant say bc theres literally zero indicator to know for sure whether or not there's an afterlife like reincarnation or heaven/hell but i think it's nice to believe one exists
Some people would be scared about this black hole stuff but since that’s the nearest black hole from earth it’s actually very very very very very very far away for only 1560 light years (1 light year converted to earth year is actually 6 trillion miles/ 9 trillion km) it’s actually really fascinating to research about too
In my own stupid opinion if a real blackhole near our solar system appears it means that our solar system is numbered. Hahaha But dont worry after rumbling, banging and melting all human stupidity in a wormhole a new bigbang will appear and a new solar system system will be born so as a new Earth. Like a God's way of renewing the world. Like i said it's only my stupid thinking
@@ritchiedalisay-ve4uv Maybe, but that's only theorized. If true, there likely would not be an exact copy of Earth and the Sun in there, unless you mean metaphorically
I like gaia not only because its so close but because it disguised itself, as it was orbiting a star, but what gave gaia bh1 away was its energetic beam 😊😊❤
We'll be looking out for that black hole. It's amazing how this black hole didn't take any source from the blue star orbiting it. Well done on finding it. Keep up the good work.
@@lostforwar5619 Yeah, you're probably right. We mean, the black hole can easily camouflage itself in space. They do know where it is, they just can't see it. We have a trick, though. If you are looking for a black hole through a telescope (a normal one), the light from the stars and planets would, in fact, distort. If you see something like this, you might have seen a black hole. We do wonder if scientists have ever tried this theory. It would make things a whole lot easier for them. But, yes. A black hole is not easily spotted in space. So, thank you. We'll keep it in mind.
@@FourBrothers-s3f they do but it really only helps with a good parallax background in order to have highly moving light sources, and those tend to lie closer to our plane of rotation or orbit
Please correct me if I am mistaken but I was under the assumption that black holes are unobservable due to the thought of them being so powerful that they suck in absolutely everything near it- even light- which you need in order to "see"... Therefore no black holes are able to be photographed or recorded in any visual way .?
@@sarabinladen2122 well, just like you can see light, you can also observe the absence of it. That is why it’s a „black“ hole. Additionally, black holes form an accretion disk around it, which is matter that has not reached its event horizon yet, which is also visible.
@@ollymounara605 Not one photo of a black hole. It's the first ever photograph. It's not like the ones in CGI, it looks small and blurry and is this orange and red circle. Look up "first photo of a black hole" it should be the first image that pops up with NASA Science (.gov)
Good question. Why can't they even show us a photograph/image capture? If someone actually saw this object "Lens" the neighbor star then this would be published on the front cover of all major publications, no? CGI hype is pathetic clickbait.
You won't but you can see the star orbiting around the black hole. You won't see the black hole directly but if you take pictures of the orbiting star at regular intervals over its whole period, you could reproduce the orbit and then deduce the position of the black hole within that region of the sky!!!
Well since a black holes gravity is so immense, it warps the fabric of time and space around it. So when scientists look up into the night sky and see a cluster of the sky and stars being warped tremendously, they know it's a black hole and it's gravitational effects
none of what they said is true truth is they use these "holes" to stargate and travel from one part of earth back down to another part quickly. The movie stargate was not about traveling in time but traveling to a far away land on earth through a star gate portal black hole using the stars
Our galaxy probably contains 100 to 400 billion stars, and is about 100,000 light-years across. So if 1560 light years is the distance, that black hole is inside our Milky Way galaxy 😂
The distance is how long the light takes to reach us. Most of the stars we see with our naked eyes are 1,000 light years away, so yeah, a simple telescope would see it.
@@mrsheabutter You are talking about normal cameras/telescopes able to capture/see images in same resolution as the eye while the instruments used to find these star systems are different and much more complex machinery so it wouldn't be able to capture those images
Yeah, but black holes aren't anything super special. They're just like every other celestial object. A lot of mass with gravity. Possibilities of one coming towards us is the same as a star doing that. The closest star system is Alpha Centauri, but no one is afraid.
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeepblack holes dont radiate by default, there might be a radiation spike when it has an active feeding phase, but if they are dormant there is nothing except maybe hawking radiation. IF hawking radiation turns out to be real. Any stellar mass black hole would not even produce enough radiation during an active phase to matter to us. You are thinking about quasars, super massive black holes in galactic centers. those can sterilise their entire host galaxy if they are strong enough, but those are not anywhere near us. we are talking about regular stellar mass Black holes, which are not dangerous at all
The reason its likely not tearing the star could be the mass of the blackhole due to the roche limit. It is also has alot more mass than the star even if it is the same size as the star due to density
It would be really hard to observe since it would have a very low magnitude (which black holes have) and I don’t think a basic telescope will have the ability to see it.
The black holes, Gaia BH1 and Gaia BH2, are respectively located just 1560 light-years away from us in the direction of the constellation Ophiuchus and 3800 light-years away in the constellation Centaurus. In galactic terms, these black holes reside in our cosmic backyard. Not Taurus. 😂🎉
none of what they said is true truth is they use these "holes" to stargate and travel from one part of earth back down to another part quickly. The movie stargate was not about traveling in time but traveling to a far away land on earth through a star gate portal black hole using the stars
what do you expect from all these stupid clickbait channels with clickbait content.. WOW JWST found this and that, humans have discovered the multiverse, Hubble found Thanos on Titan polishing his gauntlet.. i always report all these videos for child nudity or s3xual content, hopefully someday they'll filter out
none of what they said is true truth is they use these "holes" to stargate and travel from one part of earth back down to another part quickly. The movie stargate was not about traveling in time but traveling to a far away land on earth through a star gate portal black hole using the stars
@@christopherfrazier85It's 1560 lightyears away. That's only "close" because space is so mind-bogglingly big that even light is slow to travel through it. In absolute terms, it's farther away than a human can understand, by several orders of magnitude.
@richiejohnson how do you know what we asked 50k years ago?? Lol but obviously it's super interesting, but acting as we know for a fact what anything out there really is, is nonsense. We are making assumptions based what we observe immediately around us, nothing more, nothing less. Just think it's funny we say things about light years away as if we are certain that's the case, but can't even tell someone for certain about everything that lives at our very own ocean floor.
Imagine a civilization that lived on a plant 1.4 au from it's star that did black hole experiments. One of the experiments goes too far and the black hole swallows them, their planet, and their solar system and then their star orbits a point where they used to exist.
A black hole really cant swallow a solar system. Sure, once youre in its vicinty you're toast, but if your black hole is the same mass as your star nothing will change for that solar system gravity wise.
The behaviour of the black hole at a distance would actually make no difference as to orbiting a star. It's just gravity. Yeah the sky would look weird when it's up there. But if life does evolve on the planet close to it, then it will be pretty lucky to have that view.
@@cpK054L Because if the sun was replaced by an object with the same mass and movement and gravitational pull then why would the gravity change at all? There's no reason for anything to change on that front if those three statistics stay the same
Oh yeah technically everything in the milky way galaxy is orbiting a supermassive black hole ad the very center of the galaxy. Without it there wouldn't even be a milky way xd
@@zaingamingtv2242 That's false. Removing the Milky Way's central black hole would yield minimal change. The combined mass/gravity of all matter in the Milky Way is what keeps it together, not the central black hole. There's also the role of dark matter which must be considered
One cannot really "look" at a black hole cuz all the photons required for your eyes to look at it are being sucked up into it. Black holes are the most shy objects ever.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Epoch J2000 Equinox J2000
Constellation Ophiuchus
[1]Right Ascension 17h 28m 41.09661s
[2]Declination−00° 34′ 51.5234″
Pin this crap !!! Thank you for commenting this 🙇♂️
Yeah cause i understood that
@@EJugglyI'm sorry but if you don't know what declination and RA are then you shouldn't even be interested in locating the damn thing lmfao
@@beachchaos1863 You have no right to tell someone what they should or shouldn't be interested in.
@@NiftyyR6 goofy ass
The not mentioned interesting thing is that it was discovered by the Gaia satellite which is an amazing piece of technology.
Everybody speaks about the JWST but Gaia is also incredible powerful!
I was also noticing this 👍
It insists upon itself.
I didn't know about this !! Thank you
Is this the same Gaia Project Tscope that mapped the star field as observed from Earth, perhaps more importantly establishing pulsar locations and timing in pursuit of gravitational wave measurements.
@@patriciathomas8752 I believe it is
I love how black holes are always shown as huge but they’re actually pretty small compared to stars (although obviously massive).
Actually, they can be smaller than most start but they can also be larger than several solar systems put together.
I always wish they talked about the volume of black holes whenever they bring up hpw massive they are. Obvioisly we know they are massive, I am more interested in their density 🤣
@@Luis-Torres their density is infinite. infinite density is what makes a black hole, a black hole
These are Soul escape holes.... for those who die and do not want to return to this Hell Hole Crack Rock! I'm going straight into one.... no second thoughts!
Perhaps most videos show the event horizon instead of the actual black hole.
For those who don’t know, an astronomical unit is the distance between the Earth and Sun which is roughly 150 million kilometers
Really don't care. Just like the video
Thank you! I love learning more about this stuff. ❤ My kids do too
@@melissa3079ayala ok
@@melissa3079ayalaif you don't care, then just don't comment, this comment is for people who don't know and would like to know, if you don't care, then just leave it
@@melissa3079ayala Of course everyone is going to be smarter than you when you have an attitude like yours to learning new things. You'll grow up one day though. 👌
Love how the location directions are "It's around Taurus, figure it out."
Still more accurate than GPS.
@@silentrampage4063 lmao
That is enough information to look for further details in databases.
@@michaelpettersson4919 Or they could just point at a star "in" Taurus and draw a line to where the location is. That's like saying the North Star is around the Big Dipper.
Worse, it’s not even the correct constellation. That black hole is in Ophiuchus. Probably just giving out wrong information to get more comments to boost the algorithm
Most stars: "You circle around me. I'm the boss."
That poor star: "Heeeeeeelp meeeeeeee."
Most stars orbit a black hole. The sun is orbiting around a massive black hole at the center of the milky way
@@acart5388 - Well.....
That is not exactly the same.
@@acart5388 That's like saying police officers in the usa work for the president. I mean... ya.. technically? In a round about way, I guess? But how many police officers are going to meet the president and get sucked... into their field of influence?
@@achaille9110well it’s relative… as an earthling I like to think the sun is subjected to something mightier 😊
@@wanderlustislamabad8082 - Well, we all are subject to something mightier. But, Sagittarius A is 25,000 lightyears away. The entire Milky Way Galaxy orbits it. Has been for more than 13 billion years.
Unless your star system is up close (and personal) with it, there's not any peril from it or, influence, much at all.
*"You can actually find this black hole with a telescope ehhh somewhere around Taurus- gtg k bye."*
😭😭😭
hhhhhhh
😭😭🤣🤣
"simple telescope" 😂😂😂
Cringe
These facts makes me wonder everytime. How tiny we are on earth! We can't even imagine what is really out there beyond the human discovered universe. What a suspenseful reality. So amazing 😇
@@aeroprakash87 more amazing all is without a creator ! , as nobody cares about to mention
@@aeroprakash87 more amazing the fact that a lot of things that NASA is descovering are mentioned in the Holy Quran before one thousand and five hundreds years ago including black holes and their functions, the expansion of the universe , the spiral movement of the sun and other blankets , the knocking stars which confirm that This book is sent from the creature of the earth and the space . Thanks God for being muslim
@@zahidayyub290 "No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has imagined what God has prepared for those who love Him."
the nearest black hole is my wallet lol
True
So the other you has all your money
😂😂😂😂
wait what why?
And that black hole will steel ur money
I’m no astrophysicist, but I watched documentaries about black holes and the whole existence of them is fascinating beyond belief.
Do you have any favourites that stand out? I would love to watch them too! 🌌
My understanding is that a black hole is just a star who in its lifetime became so dense causing its gravitational pull to be so strong as to prevent light from escaping it and so you can’t see it and they call it black. It appears to be a hole but actually at the bottom there is an extremely dense mass that is distorting the space around it. some people speculate that it is truly a hole as an entry into another universe but that’s pure speculation and we’ll probably never know
Same here bud, give us some recommendations
Watch Kurzgesagt’s three videos on them. In particular, “Black Holes 2” goes into the most absurd implications of their existence, i.e. the information paradox and the holographic principle.
And if you haven’t, look up what it took for the EHT to actually get a _photograph_ of one of these monstrosities - 100 years, at last, after Einstein first proposed their hypothetical existence using mathematics alone.
As I commented before, I recommend a couple from NOVA, a PBS channel that is on UA-cam and one of them actually shows that they do exist by a sound that took millions of years to reach the Earth and scientists made a device that recorded it. Comment if you know the one I’m talking about.
He made it sound so easy that i can just look outside and see a black hole
Well it is black...🤷
While showing nothing but CGI.
Star maps app. C'mon dumb dumbs.
@@JFK-ir7yzWhat are they gonna do, film a real black hole?
No of course not. Film a “real” black hole haha. Thats not possible. Exactly
This is an amazing discovery. Please keep finding facts about our universe ❤🌹
You would not be able to observe it with a regular telescope. If we could, we would've found it sooner. The truth is, even if black holes were visible in any way (they're not, that's why they're called black holes) and at stellar mass, this thing would actually be tiny. While it is more massive than any object we could immediately compare it to, it would actually not even be as large as the earth. You definitely can't see a planet sized object from that far.
could it be because it is only observable by watching the star that orbits it pass behind it.
You can only see black holes affects on things around it not the hole itself
I think you missed the mark on all of that, schniitz. You can certainly "see" the effects of the black hole on the star that orbits it and you can see the swirling mass of material the hole is heating up, through friction, as it ingests what it pulls off of its companion.
TMYK, pal...
@@TheInvisibleOrange26wait until you find out what an event horizon is
also the orbits probably decades long so the average stronomer wouldnt be able to notice any movement in the star
Okay, I've found Taurus. Now, what?
Leaving a comment here, incase someone finds an answer, I will be notified.😅
@@neerajkale- Me too 😊
Now pack it at it horns.
How the hell can someone look for it if it doesn't have an accretion disc. This guy didn't even explain it.
@@vikramsinghchauhan9083 - Well, first.....You're gonna need an expensive telescope.....
Then, locate the star that's circling nothing in the middle.
But, even if you find it, it's not much to look at.....
Because there's no accretion disc.
"You can see it with a telescope." Proceeds to show black hole from the movie Interstellar.
Rofl, heliocentric system is demoniac
😂
Which is cgi. So in effect not showing you anything at all.
Pretty cool ey, now you don't need to get a telescope. The real thing probably doesn't look as impressive anyway... Might as well draw a black circle on a picture of a galaxy in Photoshop and you get more or less the same thing. Warp the edges a bit, tada
😂😂😂😂
I saw this one when I played Space Engine earlier today, it truly is a beautiful behemoth
“Thanks for watching, and keep looking up”
Me: **looks at my ceiling**
This AI thinks it's NDT.
😅
@@ShikuroAkane think they're talking about the voice
@@ShikuroAkanelmao did they just assume your existence? 😂
🕷️ ...🤔 what's that? ☝️😌 that's a spider 🕸️
Right. 😮
Black hole: stop moving and let me eat you.
Star: I thought we were playing tag.
i cackled at this gg
Ye
Eventually it will get eaten
@@TimeFadesMemoryLastsif it already hasn’t
“Just look for the constellation Taurus”
Me after 50 years of scanning around Taurus with my normal telescope looking for a black hole
💀
It's about the friends we made along the way..? 🫠
Well, it is black...
You attempt to perceive a hole in a void.
watch, I bet it occurs on that one day where the whole sky is filled with clouds and it's -1 degrees out
It's actually in the Ophiucus constellation, not Taurus.
It's kinda scary to think there are just completely dark rogue black holes with no accretion disks just roaming in space. We would have literally no idea even if one came right towards us.
Same thing as sudden gamma ray bursts, we would have no idea until one hit us because it's moving at the speed of light.
@@Litepaw we would just get pulled into its orbit we been flying around in space this long without clashing with black holes why would it happen in your life time 🤷🏽♂️
Black holes don't "travel" around the universe tho. It would be the other way around where an object (spaceship, asteroid, etc that moves) would get too close to the black hole. The black hole is just sitting there
When I say "object" that moves, it also includes photons (light) because it's moving and that photon wouldn't be able to escape the black hole (hence the name black hole where even light can't escape)
When I said "Object" it included photons of light as photons move and wouldn't be able to escape the black hole
Actually, there is a Laser Interferometer Gravitational wave Observatory (LIGO) that can detect gravitational waves and gamma ray bursts.
this just made me realize that galaxies are just tons of solar systems orbiting a black hole.
Tons is an understatement
yh so this is not the closest one, ours is
@@lauramaria8880pretty sure we're closer to the one in the video than the one theorized to be in the center of the galaxy
@@angelTechnician64 ur right acc, I didn’t know there were random black wholes within the galaxy as well..
@@lauramaria8880 interesting stuff 🤔
Instructions unclear...
Been staring at my ceiling for hours...
Tripping balls
High how are you now right?
Stare in your pocket and wallet 😅😅
@@Eternal1nstant how high are you?
I stopped talking acid in 1972. 😂
This guy when asked for directions to the nearest gas station: "Okay, take the second street right and then it will be in the next state .... bye"
And there are only 4 streets to the left and then a dead end
If you have a normal telescope and look in the Taurus direction, you'll find it 😂
@@Sonsaiyon it's not even in taurus 😅
@@Limelaz23 omfg... this guy knew sh*t 😂
I mean, you may get a really good explanation of the cosmic importance of the gas station, if that's what you were headed there for lol
This has to be my favorite video yet! 😍 What an amazing concept!
Hearing about space is always so fascinating yet terrifying at the Same time
Just like the ocean
@@christopherfrazier85Except, it's infinitely bigger.
Why be terrified?
It's just amazing 🥳
🧙♂️ Earth is a great place to be!
@@christopherfrazier85 aye mate the ocean it truly a scary place worst is there's still shut down there we don't even know about
@OhAncientOne I get what you mean but imagine being an astronaut and your tether broke and that's you left floating towards some mad planet like Jupiter or something or getting turned into human spaghetti by a backhole lol if it was totally safe id be fine with it but I gotta agree with the first persons comment especially after that experimental submarine imploded
Chances are, you see millions of black holes just looking at any part of the sky. You can be very proud of your eyesight
Well by the same logic, everyone sees atoms, quarks and even electrons all the time - even when the eyes are closed, cus eyelids are made of matter too
@@bigsmall246 Well that is correct so I don't get your point here
😂Alright who has the Acid
I’ll have what y’all having…
You are right you just need to squint a little to look further
@@spooky9030 Which one of "Dam" all is the More appropiate to *Follow Up Closely* during the whole Journey of the Galaxy of *AR-Quick_Made$*
Black hole: are you my planet?
Sun: mabye
@@magiesantos4415 caseoh sized coversation
👁️🫦👁️❤️
this is a Caseoh sized conversation
👁️🫦👁️❤️
@@magiesantos4415 i like your humor.
@@Xmarkthingsnot caseoh dawg😭
That was not sun . Sun is the name of the star that is in our solar system, .we named the star in our solar system sun. Every star in space is not sun.
I learned so much from this❤❤❤
It's not located in Taurus constellation but Opiuchus constellation. And you can't see it from your telescope easily. It's called black hole for a reason as not even light escapes from it. Given its size, it's accretion disk would be smaller than a supermassive black hole.
BUT, since the star orbits around the black hole, perhaps you can time it so that you can see the dimming of said star signifying the presence of a black hole
@@quinnbeasley94 True!
And he said star orbit blackhole 1.4 astronomycal UNit of I mean it's not possible
Didn't the narrator say that there was no accretion disc ?
@@jamesbarbour8400 yes, but he just mentions it once in the beginning I think, easy to miss.
"Just look for Taurus!"
"Ok, found Taurus."
"Tada! It's there somewhere! How's that?"
"Anticlimactic."
Need to be more specific. You cannot see the black hole. You can see only the star of the binary system. Gaia BH 1 is the name of the binary system, not the black hole.
Yeah I think there some missing information here. We can only see the effects that blackholes have on the things around it. Not the actual blackhole, hence the term "blackhole". But they are saying that it can be observed with a simple telescope? But there's no accretion disc or mass transfer..so no super heated material around it..and the star itself would only be a tiny pinpoint light. This isn't making sense how we can "see it for ourselves".
It is seeing the star that orbits the blackhole that's *inferred* when the narrator says that you can spot the blackhole with a simple telescope..... because you're effectively looking right at the blackhole since its a binary system (close enough together that the tiny point of light is virtually the same location as the blackhole given both the distance between the two objects, and the distance between us and the system).
@@shamlotbestrhapsever7437 The narrator doesn't say you can 'spot' the black hole he says you can see the black hole. Also as I've said before is not the name of the black hole it's the name of the binary system. If we want to talk science, we can't talk slop like that. He's demonstrating he doesn't have a clear concept of what is going on, and he's projecting that inaccuracy upon anyone who may buy into what he's saying.
@@MIN0RITY-REP0RT IT WAS *INFERRED* - anyone with the slightest knowledge of blackholes knows you can't see one directly. He even acknowledges a lack of accretion disc or mass transfer effectively making the blackhole *unseeable.*
Perhaps his choice of words weren't ideal (and definitely click-baity) but I'd argue this narrator's "slop" is less egregious than someone's inability to comprehend basic inference.
In other words, if you read the narrator's comments 100% literally (i.e. "see the blackhole"), you probably shouldn't be watching Blackhole clips to in the first place -- and better to start with actual Channels that provide a more substantive introduction versus a video that's 1minute long.
@@shamlotbestrhapsever7437 Your's is the lamest vanity reply I've ever read. He, and you, are products of the dumbed-down educational system in America - and the best you can do is double-down on defending that which cannot be rationally defended. I don't need to stop watching UA-cam shorts, I need to stop communicating with Internet deadweight such as yourself. You are blocked. :-)
Finally a good short. Space is so god damn cool.
Instructions unclear, my Taurus friend did not like me staring at them
😂😂
😂😂😂❤
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Is this comment what made you choose that name?
@@arcade_frog nah I’ve had this since usernames were introduced on yt
I remember when I was in high-school science and black holes, were still only thought to exist. Our textbooks had maybe 1 or 2 sentences on the subject, saying black holes, may or my not exist.
Wow... you must be old.... like.....40 or 45.
@@kevenc4843 Not bad! I'm going to be 45 this year. That's not that old. lol
You must be ancient, im 32 and they were known as fact when i was a kid, lots of info about them too. Damn.
@@ToGTheDestroyer you both are ancient im just 18 hehehe
Are we gonna die from the black hole?
"You can see it with a telescope"
"It's 1560 light years away from us"
1560 Light years is in our neighborhood.
How does the Kozai-Lidov mechanism influence the orbital dynamics of a trans-Neptunian object within a three-body system involving a distant stellar companion?
To provide an answer I’ll have to break this up into 12 points.
1. Introduction to the Kozai-Lidov Mechanism:
• The Kozai-Lidov mechanism describes oscillations in the orbit of a celestial body due to gravitational perturbations from a distant, inclined companion. It was first identified by Yoshihide Kozai and Michel Lidov independently in the 1960s.
2. Three-Body System:
• The system consists of a primary body (the Sun), a secondary body (a trans-Neptunian object, TNO), and a tertiary body (a distant stellar companion). The tertiary body exerts a periodic gravitational influence on the TNO.
3. Initial Conditions:
• The TNO orbits the Sun, and the distant stellar companion has an orbit inclined relative to the TNO’s orbital plane. This inclination is crucial for the Kozai-Lidov mechanism to take effect.
4. Perturbations and Oscillations:
• The distant stellar companion’s gravitational influence causes periodic perturbations in the TNO’s orbit. These perturbations lead to coupled oscillations in the TNO’s orbital eccentricity (how elongated the orbit is) and inclination (the tilt of the orbit relative to the plane of the solar system).
5. Eccentricity and Inclination Exchange:
• Over time, the TNO’s eccentricity and inclination undergo periodic exchanges. When the TNO’s eccentricity increases (making the orbit more elongated), its inclination decreases, and vice versa. This exchange happens in a predictable cycle known as Kozai cycles.
6. Effect on Orbital Parameters:
• The Kozai-Lidov mechanism can drive the TNO into highly eccentric orbits, bringing it closer to the Sun at perihelion (closest approach) and farther at aphelion (farthest point). These changes can lead to significant variations in the TNO’s orbital parameters over time.
7. Secular Timescales:
• The timescales for these oscillations are secular, meaning they occur over long periods (thousands to millions of years), as opposed to short-term perturbations from planets within the solar system.
8. Role of Tertiary Body’s Mass and Distance:
• The effectiveness of the Kozai-Lidov mechanism depends on the mass and distance of the distant stellar companion. A more massive or closer companion will exert stronger perturbations, leading to more pronounced oscillations in the TNO’s orbit.
9. Impact on TNO Population:
• The Kozai-Lidov mechanism can influence the distribution and evolution of the TNO population. Some TNOs may be driven into highly eccentric orbits, potentially becoming short-period comets or being ejected from the solar system.
10. Observational Evidence:
• Observations of TNOs with unusual orbital parameters can provide evidence for the Kozai-Lidov mechanism at work. The detection of distant stellar companions (e.g., wide binary stars) can further support the theory.
11. Theoretical Models and Simulations:
• Astronomers use theoretical models and computer simulations to study the Kozai-Lidov mechanism’s impact on TNOs. These models help predict how TNO orbits evolve over time and the likelihood of specific orbital configurations.
12. Broader Implications:
• Understanding the Kozai-Lidov mechanism has broader implications for studying the dynamics of other multi-body systems, such as exoplanetary systems, multiple star systems, and the formation and evolution of planetary systems.
In summary, the Kozai-Lidov mechanism is a critical process in celestial mechanics that explains how distant gravitational perturbations can lead to significant, long-term changes in the orbits of trans-Neptunian objects and other celestial bodies within three-body systems.
It has a magnitude (brightness level) of 13.5 so it’s almost impossible to see with a telescope and it’s a black hole so that makes it even tougher to find since no light can be emitted. Note that the nearest galaxy Andromeda, has a magnitude of 3.44 and is hard to find in suburbs too
Thanks for saving everyone who was gonna try finding it
I've seen Andromeda with the naked eye, but I was in Kruger National Park, zero light pollution.
@@simonharris4873 Cool! I’ve always wanted to see it but it’s tough as I live in a polluted area
@@Shaquille0atmeal2028 If you stay in Kruger Park, they have the best night safaris. One of them was an astronomy night. You can see so many stars in Kruger, it's just not funny. If you get the chance, go. You'll love it.
Magnitude 13.5 can be resolved - just barely - by most medium size amateur telescopes on a night with very good seeing. That said, you won't have much to look at if you do.
In case you're wondering: an astronomical unit is the average distance from the centre of the earth to the centre of the sun. Roughly 150 million kilometres.
Thanks, I did not knownthis
I wonder why would someone even watch videos like this one of they don't know what an AU is.
@@12carbon Maybe to learn something new? I'm assuming you don't know everything, so why do you watch UA-cam videos or read a book?
@@castleanthrax1833 It is expected from a person that is interested in space to know about one of the most basic terms used in astronomy.
@@12carbon If someone is interested in space, they have to learn about these matters at some point in time, do they not? I mean, at the moment they show an interest, that piece of knowledge does not spontaneously become known to them.
Be honest, you're simply trying to have a flex by stating "I'm smart because I already know what an AU is."
Black holes are so cool, to stop time or speed it up is crazy.
If you stay under a black hole Let's say with a spaceship with advanced technology or something. Then time would feel normal, but if you would go back to earth time has changed and your children could be dead a long time ago because they aged years when you were sitting under that black hole for a few hours.
But for time itself I think a black hole absorbs it and fricking no one knows what's on the other side or if there even is an end.
Some astronomers speculate that for every black hole, there could be a white hole where everything comes back out but it's just a speculation and nothing has been proved.
Yet.
My English is not the best sorry about that. But I hope I made black holes even more interesting now if you didn't know those things.
1516
they are so scary, man
Is that a jojo reference?
Time stops after I eat taco bell
1560 light years away... bro makes it sound like a walk in the park
Gaia BH1 is located just 1,560 light-years away from Earth in the direction of the constellation Ophiuchus, while Gaia BH2 lies 3,800 light-years away in the constellation Centaurus.
Thank you. I thought it said it was 15-16 light years away.
@@WayneMcDougall😂
@@WayneMcDougall we would be in deep shit if that were the case I think
@@Ssonelol it would really depend on the size of he black hole and how much matter it was gobbling (hence radiation).
@@Ssonelol A black hole of that size and rate of consumption wouldn't pose that much of a threat even at that distance
These things are beyond our imagination, so beautiful...
PLS DONT EAT EARTH BRO
the universe is a scary place
It's all cgi generated.
@@ollymounara605 i know. Their properties are enough to call them "awesome"
I loved the way he described the nearest black hole as interesting and amazing. And not scary and dangerous 😅😅
It's not a danger to us at least
The answer to life is in the center of a blackhole. The dimensions that exist in the past and the future is thought. It is the answer to the question that has not been asked yet. It is the fabric of the universe that makes matter and energy move together. Using math to solve what blackholes are in physics would work but you first need to have all the information which we can not observe completely with our limited senses.
Ever since i saw this video, i have been researching about the universe for days
"So how do I get to the room 974A?"
"Well, just look at the floor 9."
Very excited and interested to know the time dilation in this star because of its close proximity to the black hole😊
Was going to say the same thing.
If it's only a stellar mass black hole, within range of a few times the mass of our star, it's most likely a ballet, a binary system in which they orbit each other and the dilation would be similar to that of the star alone that orbits the black hole. Only when the gravitational forces reach critical levels approaching the horizon would you see any kind of measurable differences in space time.
It's CGI. A HOAX.
Time is an abstract concept not a physical phenomenon. To go faster or slower in response to real phenomena like gravity it would have to exist in reality but it doesn't. Space is the same.
Nice
One of my absolute fascinations in life that if I could dedicate my time and not work would be Black Holes, Tornadoes, Hurricanes and Dreams. I just love learning about them and for Black Holes and Dreams developing my own theories.
People including myself can't truly comprehend how insane the nature of space/the universe is. And we're all a part of it.
Data from the European Space Agency's (ESA) Gaia mission revealed the closest known - and second closest - black holes in 2022, Gaia BH1 and Gaia BH2, which are 1,560 light-years and 3,800 light-years from Earth respectively.
Man that star is built different.
Whooooo .My pleasure 🙏 Alhamdulillah,
An amazing video 🇦🇪🕌🙏💪 shukran 🇦🇪
The scary part is that there are probably black holes a lot closer than this that we just don't know about
Scientists believe there's a dark object they cannot perceive near the sun. Some say maybe a big, dark planet, but what if it's a black hole instead o.o
Not that I know enough to know if that's even possible, just a thought xO
@@AkiraS.A.Zmaybe some kind of camouflage planet?
@@eonwe3559 Possibly. They have found a planet (Kepler-1b) that reflects only 1% of the light that hits it. That's pretty dark. And there are naturally occurring elements that do get darker, not to mention the possibility of undiscovered elements and materials
@@AkiraS.A.Z*Citation needed..............
It wouldn't be even remotely scary. Mass is mass and gravity is gravity. A black hole doesn't suddenly swallow stuff up, and one close enough to matter would be wildly detectable.
Literally asteroids are scarier, we could be wiped out at ANY MOMENT from a rock coming at us from any number of directions, but mainly one originating from an angle where the sun's glare blocks any ability to see it.
We've had them fly-by us dangerously close and not seen them until they passed us because only then were they visible to our instruments.
Theres literally nothing to fear from black holes, if one is detected in our backyard coming straight for us it will still be centuries before it matters, and you'll be gone.
The only way it could kindof sneak up is from a preposterously elliptical orbit that just grazes the supermassive at the center of our galaxy, picks up damn-near intergalactic slingshot speed and comes at us from a patch of sky where there are literally 0 stars. Its not happening.
Space is one of the most interesting thing, I have ever heard of
Yeah well it is the final frontier ✨
Your comment is the funniest thing I have ever seen!
Space contains quite literally everything you have ever heard of
the good thing is...
*its 1560 light years away*
On a cosmic scale that is actually very VERY close...
is that all ???????
Most of the universe is rapidly expanding away from us. Except for everything in the milky way and Andromeda galaxy. Everything in those two galaxies gets closer to collision. That black hole is in our galaxy
@@abbagailmarie9874yeah and?
Wow...the damn thing started grabbing my pants leg when I was walking by it earlier...damn them stray BLACKHOLES....no it's not a porno jjezzzzzzz
What if black holes are a visual manifestation of where time had been throughout space and these blackholes are the folds between these dimensions of space and time. Not a different univesrse but the same one at a different point of existence all packed and unpacked between these gateways like little living snapshots/or snowglobes.
The interesting thing about blackholes is that they dont suck everything up, its just that, once you get too close you cant get out, as blanets exist, (planets orbiting a blackhole) however, blanetary life, would be interesting
@@valentinaapostol507 dunno bro,
@@valentinaapostol507 pretty sure there is no afterlife
Once our body d!es which causes our brain to stop functioning, our consciousness is de@d.
Just like how we sleep and skip 7-8 hours, once we d!e, we would skip everything, similar to how we skipped everything before we were born :(
@@fly463 very hard to know for sure is the thing.
@@fly463 you cant say bc theres literally zero indicator to know for sure whether or not there's an afterlife like reincarnation or heaven/hell but i think it's nice to believe one exists
@@helloeverynyanz it is delusion of our humanity but there is no way to prove or disprove it so let people do whatever they want
Some people would be scared about this black hole stuff but since that’s the nearest black hole from earth it’s actually very very very very very very far away for only 1560 light years (1 light year converted to earth year is actually 6 trillion miles/ 9 trillion km) it’s actually really fascinating to research about too
In my own stupid opinion if a real blackhole near our solar system appears it means that our solar system is numbered. Hahaha
But dont worry after rumbling, banging and melting all human stupidity in a wormhole a new bigbang will appear and a new solar system system will be born so as a new Earth.
Like a God's way of renewing the world.
Like i said it's only my stupid thinking
@@ritchiedalisay-ve4uv
Inteligentă abordare!
Este posibil ceea ce spuneți !👍
@@ritchiedalisay-ve4uv Maybe, but that's only theorized. If true, there likely would not be an exact copy of Earth and the Sun in there, unless you mean metaphorically
Other black holes : yo guys . Prepare your last words .
Gaiya BH1 : Yo Guys . Let’s hang out .
I like gaia not only because its so close but because it disguised itself, as it was orbiting a star, but what gave gaia bh1 away was its energetic beam 😊😊❤
We'll be looking out for that black hole. It's amazing how this black hole didn't take any source from the blue star orbiting it. Well done on finding it. Keep up the good work.
"scientists just discovered" he did not find it 💀
@@lostforwar5619 Yeah, you're probably right. We mean, the black hole can easily camouflage itself in space. They do know where it is, they just can't see it. We have a trick, though. If you are looking for a black hole through a telescope (a normal one), the light from the stars and planets would, in fact, distort. If you see something like this, you might have seen a black hole. We do wonder if scientists have ever tried this theory. It would make things a whole lot easier for them. But, yes. A black hole is not easily spotted in space. So, thank you. We'll keep it in mind.
@@FourBrothers-s3f they do but it really only helps with a good parallax background in order to have highly moving light sources, and those tend to lie closer to our plane of rotation or orbit
@@FourBrothers-s3f ?
@@FourBrothers-s3f There's also observed gravitational effects on nearby objects that indicate the presence of black holes
Please correct me if I am mistaken but I was under the assumption that black holes are unobservable due to the thought of them being so powerful that they suck in absolutely everything near it- even light- which you need in order to "see"... Therefore no black holes are able to be photographed or recorded in any visual way .?
@@sarabinladen2122 well, just like you can see light, you can also observe the absence of it. That is why it’s a „black“ hole. Additionally, black holes form an accretion disk around it, which is matter that has not reached its event horizon yet, which is also visible.
@@sarabinladen2122 if your theory was right, we wouldn't be alive rn
There is a photograph of a black hole, the first one ever. It is possible
@@Jellzy_Daniella_Animationsit is all CGI.
@@ollymounara605 Not one photo of a black hole. It's the first ever photograph. It's not like the ones in CGI, it looks small and blurry and is this orange and red circle. Look up "first photo of a black hole" it should be the first image that pops up with NASA Science (.gov)
“It’s first the blackhole to not have mass transfer or an accretion disk”
Well, THEN HOW ARE WE GOING TO SEE IT WITH IT A SIMPLE TELESCOPE???
Good question. Why can't they even show us a photograph/image capture? If someone actually saw this object "Lens" the neighbor star then this would be published on the front cover of all major publications, no? CGI hype is pathetic clickbait.
I was wondering the same thing
You must use your *insert spongeboba voice* your I m a g I n a t I o n
You won't but you can see the star orbiting around the black hole. You won't see the black hole directly but if you take pictures of the orbiting star at regular intervals over its whole period, you could reproduce the orbit and then deduce the position of the black hole within that region of the sky!!!
Well since a black holes gravity is so immense, it warps the fabric of time and space around it. So when scientists look up into the night sky and see a cluster of the sky and stars being warped tremendously, they know it's a black hole and it's gravitational effects
Beautifull creation of our Father God. Amen
Space goes hard af 🔥 😮
How high were you when you wrote this 😂
@@flooodo VERY 🥴😂
@juancruz-yx3dg 😮💨😤🪐👽
@@Wizardofedits75This shit was not funny‼️‼️💯
Never make a joke again‼️
none of what they said is true
truth is they use these "holes" to stargate and travel from one part of earth back down to another part quickly. The movie stargate was not about traveling in time but traveling to a far away land on earth through a star gate portal black hole using the stars
"You can find this black hole yourself with a SIMPLE telescope, it is 1560 light years away." 💀
Our galaxy probably contains 100 to 400 billion stars, and is about 100,000 light-years across. So if 1560 light years is the distance, that black hole is inside our Milky Way galaxy 😂
Yea, just look for Taurus
The distance is how long the light takes to reach us. Most of the stars we see with our naked eyes are 1,000 light years away, so yeah, a simple telescope would see it.
A simple telescope could not see this, it is utterly tiny, youd have to spend damn near millions.
You can't even see the black hole tbf, video is misleading
When our instruments get better, we will likely find out that black holes are in fact much closer to us than we think.
Or zoom onto the moon surface and see the dune buggy and American flag left behind, or NOT!
@@mrsheabutter You are talking about normal cameras/telescopes able to capture/see images in same resolution as the eye
while the instruments used to find these star systems are different and much more complex machinery so it wouldn't be able to capture those images
Do black holes move? Meaning travel like a comets ☄️
And the more interesting fact is that there may be black holes lurking much closer to Earth which were just not yet discovered
Yeah, but black holes aren't anything super special.
They're just like every other celestial object.
A lot of mass with gravity. Possibilities of one coming towards us is the same as a star doing that. The closest star system is Alpha Centauri, but no one is afraid.
@@johnnycripplestar5167 definetely, the a higher chance to get eaten by a shark than this happening in our lifetime lul
Can't be that close otherwise we'd not have life from all the radiation.
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeepblack holes dont radiate by default, there might be a radiation spike when it has an active feeding phase, but if they are dormant there is nothing except maybe hawking radiation. IF hawking radiation turns out to be real. Any stellar mass black hole would not even produce enough radiation during an active phase to matter to us. You are thinking about quasars, super massive black holes in galactic centers. those can sterilise their entire host galaxy if they are strong enough, but those are not anywhere near us. we are talking about regular stellar mass Black holes, which are not dangerous at all
@@MrMegaMetroid Ah ok good to know thank you for your detailed reply explaining the difference I really appreciate it.
The reason its likely not tearing the star could be the mass of the blackhole due to the roche limit. It is also has alot more mass than the star even if it is the same size as the star due to density
Thankyou for this educational fact ❤❤you just got a new subscriber 😊
It would be really hard to observe since it would have a very low magnitude (which black holes have) and I don’t think a basic telescope will have the ability to see it.
👍 Wonderful information about black hole you have given. Thank you very much for sharing.
“The best part is you can see it for yourself”
-No one…ever…
You forgot said....
Look outside on a dark night...it's small & very black.
@@creepingtod I said what I said, and I’ll say it again.
Cool graphics bud 👏👌
You can see it by looking for "the constellation of Taurus" except it's actually in Ophiuchus. ^Thanks for the help^
It is still terrifying no matter what!
The black holes, Gaia BH1 and Gaia BH2, are respectively located just 1560 light-years away from us in the direction of the constellation Ophiuchus and 3800 light-years away in the constellation Centaurus. In galactic terms, these black holes reside in our cosmic backyard. Not Taurus. 😂🎉
thank you you should be making the clips 💯🤔
you should be the one making these kind of vidz not a non-passionate in science person
Gaia BH1 is in Ophiuchus
They don't travel fast thankfully though large devastation. Snails on the garden's edges you could say.
none of what they said is true
truth is they use these "holes" to stargate and travel from one part of earth back down to another part quickly. The movie stargate was not about traveling in time but traveling to a far away land on earth through a star gate portal black hole using the stars
The fact that its star orbits the blackhole is so much special
There is absolutely no way you can look at it with a simple telescope.
Not sure but I think some of these shorts are made by AI
@@KingSlayer_.Yeah for sure, I really doubt this video is even real.
@@KingSlayer_. more like AS
Precise accurate description
The video is what is causing confusion
The video is what is causing confusion
what do you expect from all these stupid clickbait channels with clickbait content.. WOW JWST found this and that, humans have discovered the multiverse, Hubble found Thanos on Titan polishing his gauntlet.. i always report all these videos for child nudity or s3xual content, hopefully someday they'll filter out
@@TotalyKenyanbot
none of what they said is true
truth is they use these "holes" to stargate and travel from one part of earth back down to another part quickly. The movie stargate was not about traveling in time but traveling to a far away land on earth through a star gate portal black hole using the stars
Astrology❌️
Yt shorts about space sci✅️
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤wow thank you for this fine content 😊
NASA after discovering there’s a 0.000000002% chance of the black hole hitting our planet in 200 billion years:
It won’t be there anyway.
the chance is way way lower
Very cool n kind of scary.
Why scary? 😮
@@mohitbidhu3553it's Black hole
Because if it's close to earth 🌎 it cam move closer and devour the solar system
@@christopherfrazier85 Nah, it doesnt wortk like that.
@@christopherfrazier85It's 1560 lightyears away. That's only "close" because space is so mind-bogglingly big that even light is slow to travel through it. In absolute terms, it's farther away than a human can understand, by several orders of magnitude.
If we could observe it with a telescope then we would've had thousand pictures of it by now.
Yes thats bullshit
At least try to pay attention in class.
They are fascinating ,and I loved learning Einstein theory of realitivity
What a time to be alive!
@@billyhomeyer7414 no! This is one of the most exciting ages of discovery!
@@billyhomeyer7414 whatever 🥸
We still don't know anything😂😂 we can just see it differently cuz telescopes
@wallay793 Aren't you excited by the taste we've had of what might be? We know some of the answers to questions we asked 50,000 years ago!
@richiejohnson how do you know what we asked 50k years ago?? Lol but obviously it's super interesting, but acting as we know for a fact what anything out there really is, is nonsense. We are making assumptions based what we observe immediately around us, nothing more, nothing less. Just think it's funny we say things about light years away as if we are certain that's the case, but can't even tell someone for certain about everything that lives at our very own ocean floor.
Imagine a civilization that lived on a plant 1.4 au from it's star that did black hole experiments. One of the experiments goes too far and the black hole swallows them, their planet, and their solar system and then their star orbits a point where they used to exist.
A black hole really cant swallow a solar system. Sure, once youre in its vicinty you're toast, but if your black hole is the same mass as your star nothing will change for that solar system gravity wise.
@hajkie you would not know until you observe it
The behaviour of the black hole at a distance would actually make no difference as to orbiting a star. It's just gravity. Yeah the sky would look weird when it's up there. But if life does evolve on the planet close to it, then it will be pretty lucky to have that view.
A plant?
@@cpK054L Because if the sun was replaced by an object with the same mass and movement and gravitational pull then why would the gravity change at all? There's no reason for anything to change on that front if those three statistics stay the same
"We're not orbiting a black hole, nothing orbits a black hole"
Well, Doctor Who writers, don't you feel silly now?
Oh yeah technically everything in the milky way galaxy is orbiting a supermassive black hole ad the very center of the galaxy. Without it there wouldn't even be a milky way xd
they have been silly for some time now
@@zaingamingtv2242 That's false. Removing the Milky Way's central black hole would yield minimal change. The combined mass/gravity of all matter in the Milky Way is what keeps it together, not the central black hole. There's also the role of dark matter which must be considered
Seeing a black hole in plain sight is 😮
One cannot really "look" at a black hole cuz all the photons required for your eyes to look at it are being sucked up into it.
Black holes are the most shy objects ever.
I have a black cat. No problem seeing it.
@johnc3403 Your black cat ain't black enough.
Mine is
Good luck finding this black hole with a simple telescope. If it was that easy, we would already have seen pictures instead of animations.
Imagine if a habitable world was near the star as the star orbits a black hole.
Time dilation would be crazy.
Millers planet irl
It really good ls love eye 👀😊👍😘💕👁️
Observe a black hole without an accretion disc! Good luck with that!
*finds a black hole with gravitational lensing
@@macblink Exactly, the accretion disc comes from the star not the BH, redshift is how you locate a large gravitational "disturbance".
Nearest black hole is 1580 light years
Me: I can't see it 💀
How do u find info about things so far away
It's a beautiful video of the galaxy.😊😮🎉
I heard Cygnus is the closest and first black hole they discovered ….